India: New and Protracted Displacement Ongoing in Absence of Formalised Response

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

India: New and Protracted Displacement Ongoing in Absence of Formalised Response 22 December 2008 India: New and protracted displacement ongoing in absence of formalised response In 2007-2008, civilians in various parts of India continued to be displaced by internal armed conflict and separatist, ethnic or communal violence, as well as conflict stemming from the threat of development-induced displacement. Over one third of the country’s 608 districts were affected by insurgent movements in 2007. The armed movement by Maoist groups known as Naxalites was the most widespread insur- gency in the country and had displaced over 100,000 people of Chhattisgarh state. Clashes between a tribal group and immigrant settlers in Assam state caused the displacement of over 200,000 people, and communal violence in Orissa state displaced tens of thousands. In Nandigram region of West Bengal state, displacement followed conflict arising from the government’s plans to evict the local community and use the land for a development project. Some groups displaced for years continued to be trapped in relief camps or relief colonies. Over 30,000 ethnic Bru IDPs were living in deplorable conditions in camps in Tripura state while authorities in Mizoram state refuse to allow them to return home. India’s largest IDP group, the over 250,000 Kashmiri Pandits, were also unable to return after up to 18 years of displacement. More than 20,000 people in Gujarat who had fled their homes during communal violence in 2002 could not return to areas of origin for fear of further violence. The Government of India has no national policy to respond to conflict-induced displacement and the responsibility for protecting this population has generally been delegated to state governments. This has resulted in a wide discrepancy of responses from state to state, and between situations within one state. It is very difficult to estimate the total number of conflict-induced IDPs in India as there is no government monitoring agency and humanitarian and human rights agencies have lim- ited access to these IDPs. The displaced whose numbers are known are generally those liv- ing in camps and registered there, and so a conservative estimate of India’s current conflict-displaced population would be at least 500,000, but could be significantly higher. www.internal-displacement.org Map of India Source: University of Texas More maps are available on http://www.internal-displacement.org/ 2 India: New and protracted displacement ongoing 22 December 2008 in absence of formalised response Introduction clashes. Violence in Assam in 2007 against migrant labourers from other India has continued to experience a num- parts of India forced thousands of them to ber of situations of internal armed con- flee the state, and ethnic clashes in 2008 flict and separatist, ethnic, or communal led to the displacement of an estimated violence as well as violence originating 212,000 people who sought safety in re- from the threat of development-induced lief camps in the northern part of the displacement. These situations have gen- state. Between 20,000 and 50,000 people erated hundreds of thousands of inter- were displaced by communal violence in nally displaced people (IDPs) and Orissa state in 2008 and sought safety by prevented the return of many to their ar- hiding in jungles or moving to relief eas of origin. camps. While the majority of those in relief camps in Assam and Orissa had left At least 231 of the country’s 608 districts the camps by the end of 2008, it is un- were affected to varying extents by in- known how many of the IDPs have been surgent movements in 2007 (SATP, India able to return to areas of origin and Assessment 2007); the armed movement whether the return is sustainable. by Maoist groups known as Naxalites has overtaken all other insurgencies in the Communities living in situations of pro- country, at least from the perspective of tracted displacement in 2007 and 2008 geographical spread, with various levels included India’s largest IDP group, the of mobilisation and violence impacting over 250,000 Kashmiri Pandits who fled 18 of India’s 28 states as of August 2007 the Kashmir Valley from 1990 onwards. (Himal South Asian, 9 September 2008). Most of this group were continuing to The Naxalite conflict had by December live in camps in Jammu and Delhi, and 2007 led to the displacement of an esti- with separatist protests against Indian mated 114,000 largely indigenous people rule which had died down in recent years within Chhattisgarh state and from flaring up dramatically in 2008 following Chhattisgarh to the adjoining states of a land row, their return in large numbers Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra and Orissa. in the near future did not appear likely. This conflict, described by India’s Prime Minister as the “single biggest internal In Gujarat state, over 21,000 Muslim security challenge ever faced” by the IDPs remained afraid to return to their country, has the potential to lead to fur- areas of origin, six years after communal ther violence and displacement. riots had forced them from their homes. In Tripura state in the north-east, Bru Several new situations of internal dis- IDPs displaced from Mizoram state in placement emerged during 2007 and 1997 were languishing in deplorable 2008. In the Nandigram region of West conditions in relief camps and the Bengal state, conflict broke out over the Mizoram government continued to pre- designation of land as a Special Eco- vent this group from returning. nomic Zone (SEZ) that threatened to dis- place the local population. Thousands of It is very difficult to estimate the total people were estimated to have been number of conflict-induced IDPs in India forced from their homes in the ensuing as there is no central government agency 3 India: New and protracted displacement ongoing 22 December 2008 in absence of formalised response responsible for monitoring the numbers some of the most marginalised and vul- displaced and returning, and humanitar- nerable communities in the country, ian and human rights agencies have lim- which is leading to conflict and conflict- ited access to them. The displaced whose induced displacement. 33 million people numbers are known are generally those are estimated to be displaced by devel- living in camps and registered there. A opment projects in India, of whom a dis- conservative estimate of India’s conflict- proportionate 40-50 per cent are tribals displaced population, based largely on (PWESCR, May 2008, p.48). figures available for IDPs in camps in areas like Jammu, Delhi, Assam and In a large-scale effort to transform India’s Chhattisgarh or at identifiable relief colo- competitiveness in the global market, the nies as in Gujarat, would be over government enacted the SEZ Act in 2005 500,000. (EPW, 12 July 2008, p.25). As of No- vember 2008, 531 of these enclaves for Displaced people who have left camps new industry and infrastructure had been have not necessarily been able to return approved, comprising 67,680 hectares of to their areas of origin due to safety con- land (GOI, November 2008). Most of cerns and they may not have received those displaced by the zones so far have land and property compensation. For ex- not received either financial compensa- ample, many Christian families who left tion or alternate land and housing sites, the IDP camps in Orissa moved to cities and the policy of acquiring land for them rather than back to their areas of origin has sparked protests from local commu- after receiving threats from Hindus in nities fearful of being displaced and los- their villages. In Assam’s Kokrajhar dis- ing access to their means of livelihood. trict, displaced persons were “released” from IDP camps by authorities with a Jammu and Kashmir cash grant and without land compensa- tion, leading many families to start living Background as IDPs outside the camps. The Kashmir Valley is the most populous It is probable that many IDPs who have of the three provinces in the state of moved out of camps have not been able Jammu and Kashmir, and lies at the heart to find durable solutions to end their dis- of the dispute between India and Pakistan placement and should still be viewed as which has continued since both countries part of India’s IDP population. Taking became independent in 1947. The other into consideration the IDPs whose dis- two provinces are Jammu and Ladakh. placement has not ended after they have Predominantly Sunni Muslim, the Valley left relief camps, and the IDPs who were hosts minority communities of Hindus living outside relief camps who remain (the Kashmiri Pandits, who made up an uncounted, it can be assumed that signifi- estimated two to three per cent of the val- cantly more than 500,000 people are cur- ley’s population prior to their displace- rently displaced by India’s conflicts. ment), Sikhs and a small number of Christians. Jammu is roughly split be- Across India, development projects are tween Hindus and Muslims, with Hindus increasingly encroaching upon the land of in a majority. 4 India: New and protracted displacement ongoing 22 December 2008 in absence of formalised response In 1989, Kashmiri Muslims opposed to 2008). Whether the establishment of a Indian rule began an armed insurgency, new state government improves the tense leading to the increasing militarisation of situation in Jammu and Kashmir and cre- the state, widespread abuses of human ates conditions enabling the return of dis- rights and the deaths of tens of thousands placed people remains to be seen. of people (ICG, 21 November 2002, pp.1-2). Displacement of Kashmiri Pandits The past few years have seen some pro- Kashmiri Pandits were forced to flee their gress in Kashmir, particularly since state homes in the Valley from 1990 onwards.
Recommended publications
  • “Being Neutral Is Our Biggest Crime”
    India “Being Neutral HUMAN RIGHTS is Our Biggest Crime” WATCH Government, Vigilante, and Naxalite Abuses in India’s Chhattisgarh State “Being Neutral is Our Biggest Crime” Government, Vigilante, and Naxalite Abuses in India’s Chhattisgarh State Copyright © 2008 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 1-56432-356-0 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch 350 Fifth Avenue, 34th floor New York, NY 10118-3299 USA Tel: +1 212 290 4700, Fax: +1 212 736 1300 hrwnyc@hrw.org Poststraße 4-5 10178 Berlin, Germany Tel: +49 30 2593 06-10, Fax: +49 30 2593 0629 berlin@hrw.org Avenue des Gaulois, 7 1040 Brussels, Belgium Tel: + 32 (2) 732 2009, Fax: + 32 (2) 732 0471 hrwbe@hrw.org 64-66 Rue de Lausanne 1202 Geneva, Switzerland Tel: +41 22 738 0481, Fax: +41 22 738 1791 hrwgva@hrw.org 2-12 Pentonville Road, 2nd Floor London N1 9HF, UK Tel: +44 20 7713 1995, Fax: +44 20 7713 1800 hrwuk@hrw.org 27 Rue de Lisbonne 75008 Paris, France Tel: +33 (1)43 59 55 35, Fax: +33 (1) 43 59 55 22 paris@hrw.org 1630 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 500 Washington, DC 20009 USA Tel: +1 202 612 4321, Fax: +1 202 612 4333 hrwdc@hrw.org Web Site Address: http://www.hrw.org July 2008 1-56432-356-0 “Being Neutral is Our Biggest Crime” Government, Vigilante, and Naxalite Abuses in India’s Chhattisgarh State Maps........................................................................................................................ 1 Glossary/ Abbreviations ..........................................................................................3 I. Summary.............................................................................................................5 Government and Salwa Judum abuses ................................................................7 Abuses by Naxalites..........................................................................................10 Key Recommendations: The need for protection and accountability..................
    [Show full text]
  • Bastar, Maoism and Salwa Judum.” in Economic and Political Weekly, Vol XLI 29, July 22, 2006, Pp
    Bastar, Maoism and Salwa Judum.” In Economic and Political Weekly, Vol XLI 29, July 22, 2006, pp. 3187-3192 Bastar, Maoism and Salwa Judum Nandini Sundar1 Visitors to the official Bastar website (www.bastar.nic.in) will ‘discover’ that Gonds “have pro- fertility mentality”, that “marriages...between brothers and sisters are common,” and that “the Murias prefer 'Mahua' drinks rather than medicines for their ailments.” “The tribals of this area”, says the website, “is famous for their 'Ghotuls' where the prospective couples do the 'dating' and have free sex also.” As for the Abhuj Marias, “(t)hese people are not cleanly in their habits, and even when a Maria does bathe he does not wash his solitary garments but leaves it on the bank. When drinking from a stream they do not take up water in their hands but put their mouth down to it like cattle.” Some of the tribals are “leading a savage life”, we are told, “they do not like to come to the outer world and mingle with the modern civilisation.” Into this charming picture of ‘savages’ who ‘shoot down strangers with arrows’, one must unfortunately bring in a few uncomfortable facts. What used to be the former undivided district of Bastar (since 2001 carved into the districts of Dantewada, Bastar and Kanker) is currently a war zone. The main roads, in Dantewada in particular, but also in parts of Bastar and Kanker, are full of CRPF and other security personnel, out on combing operations.2 The Maoists control the jungles. In the frontlines of this battle are ordinary villagers who are being pitted against each other on a scale unparalleled in the history of Indian counterinsurgency.
    [Show full text]
  • India's Naxalite Insurgency: History, Trajectory, and Implications for U.S
    STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVES 22 India’s Naxalite Insurgency: History, Trajectory, and Implications for U.S.-India Security Cooperation on Domestic Counterinsurgency by Thomas F. Lynch III Center for Strategic Research Institute for National Strategic Studies National Defense University Institute for National Strategic Studies National Defense University The Institute for National Strategic Studies (INSS) is National Defense University’s (NDU’s) dedicated research arm. INSS includes the Center for Strategic Research, Center for Complex Operations, Center for the Study of Chinese Military Affairs, and Center for Technology and National Security Policy. The military and civilian analysts and staff who comprise INSS and its subcomponents execute their mission by conducting research and analysis, publishing, and participating in conferences, policy support, and outreach. The mission of INSS is to conduct strategic studies for the Secretary of Defense, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the unified combatant commands in support of the academic programs at NDU and to perform outreach to other U.S. Government agencies and the broader national security community. Cover: Hard-line communists, belonging to the political group Naxalite, pose with bows and arrows during protest rally in eastern Indian city of Calcutta December 15, 2004. More than 5,000 Naxalites from across the country, including the Maoist Communist Centre and the Peoples War, took part in a rally to protest against the government’s economic policies (REUTERS/Jayanta Shaw) India’s Naxalite Insurgency India’s Naxalite Insurgency: History, Trajectory, and Implications for U.S.-India Security Cooperation on Domestic Counterinsurgency By Thomas F. Lynch III Institute for National Strategic Studies Strategic Perspectives, No.
    [Show full text]
  • FEBRUARY 2017 Rs
    Vol. XXXVII, No. 2 ISSN-0970-8693 FEBRUARY 2017 Rs. 20 Editorial : Simultaneous Parliament and State Assembly Elections Simultaneous Parliament and State Not Possible and Against Federalism Assembly Elections - Rajindar Sachar (1) Rajindar Sachar ARTICLES, REPORTS & DOCUMENTS: Prime Minister Modi has for last 6 months kept a continuous refrain for Is the human rights protection regime in India crumbling? - Pushkar Raj (2); Analysis: holding simultaneously Lok Sabha and State Assembly polls and the Sachar Report Gathers Dust, Abolishing supposed advantages that would flow from it. As was to be expected Personal Laws can't Change Dark Realities - number of newspapers and persons are picking up this matter. It is Humra Quraishi (11); Resolution: (Adopted in unfortunate that Election Commission of India and Nite Aayog should the seminar on 'Justice Sachar Committee Report: A Review After 10 Years') (13); PUCL have gone along with this suggestion without even the minimum TN & Pud. State Report read out in the PUCL constitutional requirement of a public debate and Seminars – and more National Convention at Raipur: Appraisal unforgivably without discussions of the matter with other major political Report on the activities carried out during parties and the State governments. In order to have a worthwhile debate, 2014-16 (17). it is necessary to know the legal and factual situation at present. The present life of Lok Sabha expires in May 2019. Modis repeated PRESS STATEMENTS, LETTERS, AND NEWS: emphasis on simultaneous poll is actuated by the realization that the Press Release: NHRC finds 16 women prima mood of exhilaration that he was able to create in 2014 Parliamentary poll facie victims of rape, sexual and physical assault by police personnel in Chhattisgarh is diminishing very fast.
    [Show full text]
  • Insurgency, Counter-Insurgency, and Democracy in Central India
    CHAPTER 9 Insurgency, Counter-insurgency, and Democracy in Central India NANDINI SUNDAR The Naxalite movement began in India in the late 1960s as a peasant struggle (in Naxalbari, West Bengal, hence the name Naxalite). It represented the revolutionary stream of Indian Marxism which did not believe that parliamentary democracy would lead to the requisite systemic change and argued for armed struggle instead. While the Indian state managed to crush the movement in the 1970s, causing an already ideologically fractured movement to splinter further (currently 34 parties by official estimates),1 in 2004 two of the major parties, the Communist Party of India (CPI) (Marxist-Leninist) People’s War (formed out of the merger of the People’s War Group with Party Unity) and the Maoist Communist Center (MCC) of India, united to form the Communist Party of India (Maoist).2 The CPI (Maoist) is currently a significant political force across several states, especially in rural areas where state services have been inadequate or absent.3 Since about 2005-6, the Maoists have become the main target of the Indian state, with thousands of paramilitary forces being poured into the areas where they are strong, and the prime minister repeatedly referring to them as India’s biggest security threat. As a consequence, armed conflict is occurring across large parts of central India and is taking several hundred lives on an annual basis. In the state of Chhattisgarh, which is the epicentre of the war, sovereignty is contested over large parts of terrain. COMPETING PERSPECTIVES ON THE MAOIST ISSUE There are three main perspectives on the Maoist issue.
    [Show full text]
  • Does the Past Drive Marginalized Communities Towards Radicalization?
    Does The Past Drive Marginalized Communities Towards Radicalization? Women of the Gond tribe. (photographed by the author)Last month, the Indian Air Force announced that the MI-17 helicopters it has deployed in Bastar, a district in the southern part of the state of Chhattisgarh, will engage in retaliatory fire against members of the insurgent Naxalite movement so that troops can defend themselves while carrying out rescue operations. Such action can be seen as an extension of what the Indian media terms Operation Green Hunt, the aggressively offensive stance the government and paramilitary forces have taken have taken since 2009 to combat the growth of Left-Wing Extremism (LWE) across roughly five Central, Southern, and Eastern states – a region often referred to as the Red Corridor. The growth of LWE is considered one of the India’s most critical domestic issues and one that, in 2010, then Prime Minister Manmohan Singh declared as the country’s biggest internal security challenge. While the LWE movement itself is multifarious, consisting of numerous groups and coalitions across the entire country, the Naxalites, formally known as The Communist Party of India (Maoist), and particularly their factions based in Bastar, have received a great deal of media attention. This has increased significantly following a violent incident in 2013, when the outfit attacked a motorcade of politicians in Dharba Valley in Chhattisgarh. The assault killed at least 18 Indian National Congress members and party workers, including Mahendra Karma, founder of the Salwa Judum anti-insurgency militia. For several years the government has sought to mitigate conflict nationally vis-à-vis institution building and restorative justice; in 2006, the Indian Ministry of Home Affairs inaugurated its Division, which was tasked with initiating to improve education and medical infrastructure, and security procedures in remote areas of the country affected by the burgeoning Maoist movement.
    [Show full text]
  • INDIA'scontemporary Security Challenges
    Contemporary Security INDIA’S Challenges Edited by Michael Kugelman INDIa’s Contemporary SECURITY CHALLENGES Essays by: Bethany Danyluk Michael Kugelman Dinshaw Mistry Arun Prakash P.V. Ramana Siddharth Srivastava Nandini Sundar Andrew C. Winner Edited by: Michael Kugelman ©2011 Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Washington, D.C. www.wilsoncenter.org Available from : Asia Program Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars One Woodrow Wilson Plaza 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20004-3027 www.wilsoncenter.org ISBN 1-933549-79-3 The Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, es- tablished by Congress in 1968 and headquartered in Washington, D.C., is a living national memorial to President Wilson. The Center’s mis- sion is to commemorate the ideals and concerns of Woodrow Wilson by providing a link between the worlds of ideas and policy, while fostering research, study, discussion, and collaboration among a broad spectrum of individuals concerned with policy and scholarship in national and international affairs. Supported by public and private funds, the Center is a nonpartisan institution engaged in the study of national and world affairs. It establishes and maintains a neutral forum for free, open, and informed dialogue. Conclusions or opinions expressed in Center publi- cations and programs are those of the authors and speakers and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Center staff, fellows, trustees, advi- sory groups, or any individuals or organizations that provide financial support to the Center. The Center is the publisher of The Wilson Quarterly and home of Woodrow Wilson Center Press, dialogue radio and television, and the monthly news-letter “Centerpoint.” For more information about the Center’s activities and publications, please visit us on the web at www.wilsoncenter.org.
    [Show full text]
  • SALWA JUDUM Captured Naxalite Political Agents, Known As Sangam, for the Guardian to Interview
    his right hand Ajay Singh, and others like him are engaged in executing the work-plan issued from the office of the then IG MW Ansari. (It is thus only just, that Ajay Singh has since been wiped out for his heinous crimes against the tribals.) The Guardian has reported: “While the soldiers say villagers come seeking refuge from the violence, the tribals tell a different story. They claim that the camps are, in reality, prisons.The guards in Bhairamgarh camp brought out SALWA JUDUM captured Naxalite political agents, known as Sangam, for the Guardian to interview. Each told a story of state-backed terror. A mob of government supporters invaded their village backed by armed soldiers who opened fire on “Naxalite houses”. A battle ensued and the guerrillas, outgunned, fled. Once an area has been “cleansed”, the homes of those used by leftwing guerrillas are destroyed and “I was a Sangam. A People were getting shot and homes burnt every day. I had no choice but to come here,” said Buddram, who used to farm around Kotrapal. Clutching her baby to her chest, Jamli recounts how the Salva Judum ‘NEW FRONT’ militia kidnapped her and seven friends as they travelled to a market. “We were told we had to come to the police station. Once we reached OF there we were kept overnight and driven to this camp where we were told if you leave you will be killed,” she said. “I was alone until my husband arrived a week later and he is trapped here too. We are not ‘HIDDEN WAR’ Naxalites.
    [Show full text]
  • “Between Two Sets of Guns” Attacks on Civil Society Activists in India’S Maoist Conflict WATCH
    HUMAN RIGHTS “Between Two Sets of Guns” Attacks on Civil Society Activists in India’s Maoist Conflict WATCH “Between Two Sets of Guns” Attacks on Civil Society Activists in India’s Maoist Conflict Copyright © 2012 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 1-56432-920-8 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch is dedicated to protecting the human rights of people around the world. We stand with victims and activists to prevent discrimination, to uphold political freedom, to protect people from inhumane conduct in wartime, and to bring offenders to justice. We investigate and expose human rights violations and hold abusers accountable. We challenge governments and those who hold power to end abusive practices and respect international human rights law. We enlist the public and the international community to support the cause of human rights for all. Human Rights Watch is an international organization with staff in more than 40 countries, and offices in Amsterdam, Beirut, Berlin, Brussels, Chicago, Geneva, Goma, Johannesburg, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, Nairobi, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Tokyo, Toronto, Tunis, Washington DC, and Zurich. For more information, please visit our website: http://www.hrw.org JULY 2012 ISBN: 1-56432-920-8 “Between Two Sets of Guns” Attacks on Civil Society Activists in India’s Maoist Conflict Map of India ................................................................................................................................ ii Summary ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Paper by Anil Kambho
    NAXALITE INSURGENCY IN INDIA - CONTEMPORARY CHALLENGES Anil Kamboj Introduction The genesis of the naxalite insurgency in India is rooted in peasants’ movement and agrarian discontent. The movement began in March 1967 when a group of revolutionaries led by Charu Mazumdar and Kanu Sanyal launched a peasants uprising at Naxalbari after a tribal youth, who had a judicial order to plough his land, was attacked by the goons of local landlords. The tribals retaliated and refused to part with the land owner’s share of their produce and lifted the entire stock from his granary. It ignited a fire that spread in the state. This was brought down by use of force and simultaneously bringing in some land reforms by the state government and could be termed as phase one of the movement. Later on, the phase two of the Naxal movement spread to 9 states that is, Bihar, Jharkhand, West Bengal, Orissa, Chattisgarh, Madhya Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra and Uttar Pradesh; posing a challenge to the nation. In the pre- dominantly tribal areas, naxals hold Kangaroo courts; impose levis on contractors, mine owners, businessmen and even on government officials. The movement has thrown up leaders, a legion of workers and sympathisers who believed that guerrilla warfare tactic would liberate India. The ‘Red Corridor’ stretching from Nepal through some of the most backward regions of the country up to Andhra Pradesh and even up to Tamil Nadu, is the territory where the Naxalites take on the state might on a daily basis. But what do the Naxals want to achieve? Their first aim is to establish a base area inside the Dandakaranya forest, spanning Madhya Pradesh, Chattisgarh, Orrisa and part of Maharashtra.
    [Show full text]
  • Operation Green Hunt
    Operation Green Hunt -a perspective of political economy Anand Teltumbde Convention on Operation Green Hunt and Democratic Rights Mumbai 16 January 2010 is the single biggest internal “Naxalism security challenge” Singh,ever Primefaced Minister by our in 2006 country Manmohan - Dr. “Naxalism is the greatest internal security threat to India” … and to development” - Dr. Manmohan Singh, Prime Minister in 2009 - are nothing” but cold “Naxalites blooded murders -Advt. issued by the Home Ministry Threat to Internal Security of Rural India of Poor Peasants, INDIA Farmers, Landless labourers, Dalits, Adivasis…? ? Urban India of Slum and pavementWhich IndiaDwellers, Casual Workers, Contract Laboureres, … ? Middle India of swelling Middle Classes? Corporate India of Corporate Honchos? Globalizing India of Dollar Millionaires and Billionaires? Surely, it is a Threat to the India of handful Globalist Elites! Nothing but cold-blooded murderers… Human life is sacred No one can and should defend destruction of human life True, huge loss of life has taken place in Naxal conflict … both by Maoists and Security Personnel Statistics show comparable figures of Killings by both.. According to Chhattisgarh Police, In 2008, 212 people were killed.. 63 Sec. and 52 Naxals.. In 2007, 369 people were killed.. 124 Sec. and 64 Naxals… In 2006, 385 people were killed… 39 Sec. and 69 Naxals… Civilian casualty is far more and who did it is not known! Nothing but cold-blooded murderers…. What about Fake encounters? Custodial deaths? Extra-judicial killings? and Structural
    [Show full text]
  • The Maoist Attack in Chhattisgarh
    ISAS Insights No. 205 – 31 May 2013 469A Bukit Timah Road #07-01, Tower Block, Singapore 259770 Tel: 6516 6179 / 6516 4239 Fax: 6776 7505 / 6314 5447 Email: isassec@nus.edu.sg Website: www.isas.nus.edu.sg The Maoist Attack in Chhattisgarh Ronojoy Sen and Robin Jeffrey 1 The ambush of a convoy of cars returning from a political rally and the murder of 27 people on 25 May 2013 in Chhattisgarh state in central India brings together various threads that make up “the Maoist movement” that has been an intermittent feature of rural life for 50 years. The list of victims makes this clear. Among the dead were the leader of the Congress Party in Chhattisgarh state, Nand Kumar Patel, and Mahendra Karma. Karma was the architect of the Salwa Judum, a controversial and bloody movement of anti-Maoist vigilantes begun in 2005 and later declared illegal by the Indian Supreme Court. Not surprisingly, Karma was high on the Maoists’ hit list. Among the wounded is V C Shukla, 83, from an old Congress family and the reviled Minister of Information and Broadcasting during Prime Minister Indira Gandhi’s 1975-7 “emergency”. The Motive The Maoists in a statement on 28 May claimed that the primary aim behind the attack was to kill Karma. It also said the attack was “revenge” for the federal government’s ‘Operation Green Hunt’ targeting the Maoists. To the government of Chhattisgarh, however, the Salwa Judum was perfectly legal and performed an admirable public function. A former chief of the 1 Dr Ronojoy Sen is Visiting Senior Research Fellow at the Institute of South Asian Studies (ISAS), an autonomous research institute at the National University of Singapore.
    [Show full text]