Hardening Steel Using Different Quenching Media

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Hardening Steel Using Different Quenching Media German – Jordanian University (GJU) Material Science Laboratory IE 2210 Summer Semester 2008‐2009 i i Experiment 8 Hardening Steel Using Different Quenching Media Mahmood Hisham Shubbak Title Mark Objective /10 Introduction /15 Method /15 Result /30 Discussion and Conclusion /20 Report Neatness /10 Total Mark /100 1 Objective: 1. Heating steel to appropriate temperature, and then quenching it using different quenching media. 2. Measuring the hardness after quenching by different media. 3. Study the changes in hardness of steel due to the changes of the quenching media. Introduction: Plain carbon steels and alloy steels are among relatively few engineering materials, which can be usefully heat‐treated in order to vary their mechanical properties. Steels are heat treated, because of the structural changes that can take place within solid iron carbon alloys. The various heat‐treatment process appropriate to plain carbon steels are: 1. Full annealing. 2. Normalizing. 3. Process annealing. 4. Hardening. 5. Tempering. In all above process the steel is heated slowly to the appropriate temperature according to its carbon content and then cooled. It is the rate of cooling which determines the ultimate structure and properties that the steel will have at the end of each of the pre‐mentioned heat treatment process. 2 The process of hardening involves rapidly quenching the steel from appropriate temperature into quenching media. Hypereutectoid steels are heated up to 30‐50˚ C above their upper critical temperature prior to quenching. There is no particular advantage in heating hyper‐eutectoid steels above their Acm when hardening them, and in practice; the hardening temperature normally used is just 30‐50˚ C above their lower critical temperature. Quenching hypereutectoid steels from this lower temperature helps to prevent cracking and distortion. If the steel is cooled quickly, there will be no transformation into Pearlite and ferrite or Pearlite and Cementite, but into a new harder, but less ductile structure called Martensite. This is due to the allotropic transformation of the face‐centered Austenite. The most commonly used quenching media are: a. Compressed air blast. b. Oil. c. Water. d. 10% Brine (water + 10% salt). In this Experiment we studied the effect of heat treatment on the properties of carbon steel especially its hardness. We used three quenching media which are air, water and inside the furnace. Method: 1. Specimen Heating: a) Bring three specimens with similar dimensions from steel containing more than 0.3% C bars. b) Heat the furnace to the hardening temperature of the specimen (until they become totally austenite), the hardening temperature usually depends on the percentage of carbon of the steel bar used. Then put the three specimens close to each other inside the heated furnace. In order to protect them from oxidization, it is recommended to cover them with sand inside a steel cast iron container. c) Leave the specimens inside the furnace for 30– 60 minutes. 2. Quenching in different Media: a) Leave one specimen inside the furnace for a long time (6 hours or more); in order to cool it with small cooling rate. b) Take the second specimen out from the furnace using nickel tongs, and quench it in the air (larger cooling rate). c) Take the third specimen out, and quench it using the water media with stirring until it becomes cold. (the largest cooling rate). 3 3. Hardness Measuring: a) Grind the surface of each specimen properly to prepare it for the hardness test. b) Measure the hardness for each one of the specimens using the Vickers testing machine, do 3 trials for each specimen. c) Compare between the results, and discuss the effect of each quenching medium on the hardness of the specimen. Results: Applying the experiment method we got the following results: The Specimens Hardness: 1. The 1st Specimen: 9 Quenching Media: Inside the furnace (slow cooling) 9 Vickers Hardness: d1 d2 HV 1st trial 0.5388 0.5270 195.8 2nd trial 0.5471 0.5583 182.1 3rd trial 0.5546 0.5416 187.9 188.6 HV 2. The 2nd Specimen: 9 Quenching Media: air (medium cooling rate) 9 Vickers Hardness: d1 d2 HV 1st trial 0.4754 0.4456 262.3 2nd trial 0.4565 0.4518 269.9 3rd trial 0.4518 0.4628 266.0 266.1 HV 3. The 3rd Specimen: 9 Quenching Media: water (rapid cooling) 9 Vickers Hardness: d1 d2 HV 1st trial 0.3908 0.3938 361.4 2nd trial 0.4124 0.4009 336.3 3rd trial 0.4077 0.4064 341.0 346.2 HV Discussion and Conclusion: In this experiment we learned about Hardening Steel using different quenching media. 4 Heat treatment is very effective method to hardening carbon steel; the idea behind all the heat treatments is to change the structure of the alloy material in order to change its properties. In all heat treatment processes we heat the specimen to some high temperature then we cool it with some cooling rate. From the results we got in this experiment we can notice that the larger cooling rate we applied, the harder steel we got. When we use the water media (the most rapid cooling) we got very hard and brittle steel. (something like Martensite) While using the furnace cooling media, we got steel with least hardness and most ductility. (something like Pearlite) And using the air media, the output we got was something like Bainite with medium hardness and ductility (almost highest toughness). The heat treatment process (or the quenching media we used) depends always on the final product we need and its applications; for example we can use the rapid cooling process to get very hard iron and use it in gears or other high hardness needed applications. 5 .
Recommended publications
  • Effects of Carburization Time and Temperature on the Mechanical Properties of Carburized Mild Steel, Using Activated Carbon As Carburizer
    Materials Research, Vol. 12, No. 4, 483-487, 2009 © 2009 Effects of Carburization Time and Temperature on the Mechanical Properties of Carburized Mild Steel, Using Activated Carbon as Carburizer Fatai Olufemi Aramidea,*, Simeon Ademola Ibitoyeb, Isiaka Oluwole Oladelea, Joseph Olatunde Borodea aMetallurgical and Materials Engineering Department, Federal University of Technology, Akure, Ondo State, Nigeria bMaterials Science and Engineering Department, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Osun State, Nigeria Received: July 31, 2009; Revised: September 25, 2009 Due to the complexity of controlling parameters in carburization, there has been relatively little work on process variables during the surface hardening process. This work focuses on the effects of the carburizing temperature and time on the mechanical properties of mild steel carburized with activated carbon, at 850, 900 and 950 °C, soaked at the carburizing temperature for 15 and 30 minutes, quenched in oil, tempered at 550 °C and held for 60 minutes. Prior carburization process, standard test samples were prepared from the as received specimen for tensile and impact tests. After carburization process, the test samples were subjected to the standard test and from the data obtained, ultimate tensile strength, engineering strain, impact strength, Youngs’ moduli were calculated. The case and core hardness of the carburized tempered samples were measured. It was observed that the mechanical properties of mild steels were found to be strongly influenced by the process of carburization, carburizing temperature and soaking time at carburizing temperature. It was concluded that the optimum combination of mechanical properties is achieved at the carburizing temperature of 900 °C followed by oil quenching and tempering at 550 °C.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Hardening of Steel : Science and Technology J
    HISTORY OF THE HARDENING OF STEEL : SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY J. Vanpaemel To cite this version: J. Vanpaemel. HISTORY OF THE HARDENING OF STEEL : SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY. Journal de Physique Colloques, 1982, 43 (C4), pp.C4-847-C4-854. 10.1051/jphyscol:19824139. jpa- 00222126 HAL Id: jpa-00222126 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00222126 Submitted on 1 Jan 1982 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE Colloque C4, suppZ4ment au no 12, Tome 43, de'cembre 1982 page C4-847 HISTORY OF THE HARDENING OF STEEL : SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 3. Vanpaemel Center for historical and socio-economical studies on science and technology Teer EZstZaan 41, 3030 Leuven, SeZgim (Accepted 3 November 1982) Abstract. - The knowledge of the hardening phenomenon was achieved through a very cumulative process without any dis- continuity or 'scientific crisis' . The history of the hardening shows a definite interrelationship between techno- logical approach (or the application-side) and academic science . The hardening of steel appears to have been an operation in common use among the early Greeks The Greek and Roman smiths knew, from experience, how to control the.
    [Show full text]
  • The Stainless Steel Family
    The Stainless Steel Family A short description of the various grades of stainless steel and how they fit into distinct metallurgical families. It has been written primarily from a European perspective and may not fully reflect the practice in other regions. Stainless steel is the term used to describe an extremely versatile family of engineering materials, which are selected primarily for their corrosion and heat resistant properties. All stainless steels contain principally iron and a minimum of 10.5% chromium. At this level, chromium reacts with oxygen and moisture in the environment to form a protective, adherent and coherent, oxide film that envelops the entire surface of the material. This oxide film (known as the passive or boundary layer) is very thin (2-3 namometres). [1nanometre = 10-9 m]. The passive layer on stainless steels exhibits a truly remarkable property: when damaged (e.g. abraded), it self-repairs as chromium in the steel reacts rapidly with oxygen and moisture in the environment to reform the oxide layer. Increasing the chromium content beyond the minimum of 10.5% confers still greater corrosion resistance. Corrosion resistance may be further improved, and a wide range of properties provided, by the addition of 8% or more nickel. The addition of molybdenum further increases corrosion resistance (in particular, resistance to pitting corrosion), while nitrogen increases mechanical strength and enhances resistance to pitting. Categories of Stainless Steels The stainless steel family tree has several branches, which may be differentiated in a variety of ways e.g. in terms of their areas of application, by the alloying elements used in their production, or, perhaps the most accurate way, by the metallurgical phases present in their microscopic structures: .
    [Show full text]
  • Case Hardening Steel–Aisi 8620
    CASE HARDENING STEEL–AISI 8620 AISI 8620 Nickel–Chrome–Moly TYPICAL CHEMICAL ANALYSIS Carburising Steel, generally supplied Carbon 0.20% as rolled to HB 255max. Carburised Silicon 0.25% and heat treated it develops a hard Manganese 0.80% wear resistant case to HRC 60-63 and Chromium 0.50% Nickel 0.55% a tough strong core with a typical Molybdenum 0.20% tensile strength range of 700-1100 MPa, in small to medium sized sections. RELATED SPECIFICATIONS: AS 1444-1996 8620 or 8620H TYPICAL APPLICATIONS: 1.6523 20NiCrMo2-2 or Arbors, pinions, bushes, camshafts, kingpins, EN10084-1998 ratchets, gears, splined shafts etc. Or can be 1.6523H 20NiCrMo2-2H used for high tensile applications uncarburised but JIS G 4103 SNCM 220 or through hardened and tempered. JIS G 4052 SNCM 220H UNS G86200 or H86200 . Through hardening properties fair with good toughness due to the low carbon and medium alloy content, also suitable for Nitriding. TYPICAL MECHANICAL PROPERTIES – Quenched and Tempered at 200°C Section Yield Strength Tensile Strength Elongation Impact Izod Hardness mm MPa MPa % J HB 25 690 925 17 46 275 100 493 740 20 50 220 Typical Mechanical Properties for guidance only HARDENABILITY LIMITS – FOR AS1444 – 8620H GRADE Distance from quenched end – mm Hardness values max - min – HRC (values under 20 not specified) mm 1.5 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 20 25 30 35 40 HRC 48 47 43 39 35 32 30 29 26 24 23 23 23 HRC 41 37 31 25 21 - - - - - - - - CASE HARDENING STEEL – AISI 8620 - continued WELDING: Welding procedure: Readily welded in the as rolled condition with the The use of low hydrogen electrodes correct procedure, but welding in the case recommended.
    [Show full text]
  • Furnace Atmospheres No 1: Gas Carburising and Carbonitriding
    → Expert edition Furnace atmospheres no. 1. Gas carburising and carbonitriding. 02 Gas carburising and carbonitriding Preface. This expert edition is part of a series on process application technology and know-how available from Linde Gas. It describes findings in development and research as well as extensive process knowledge gained through numerous customer installations around the world. The focus is on the use and control of furnace atmospheres; however a brief introduction is also provided for each process. 1. Gas carburising and carbonitriding 2. Neutral hardening and annealing 3. Gas nitriding and nitrocarburising 4. Brazing of metals 5. Low pressure carburising and high pressure gas quenching 6. Sintering of steels Gas carburising and carbonitriding 03 Passion for innovation. Linde Gas Research Centre Unterschleissheim, Germany. With R&D centres in Europe, North America and China, Linde Gas is More Information? Contact Us! leading the way in the development of state-of-the-art application Linde AG, Gases Division, technologies. In these R&D centres, Linde's much valued experts Carl-von-Linde-Strasse 25, 85716 Unterschleissheim, Germany are working closely together with great access to a broad spectrum of technology platforms in order to provide the next generation of [email protected], www.heattreatment.linde.com, atmosphere supply and control functionality for furnaces in heat www.linde.com, www.linde-gas.com treatment processes. As Linde is a trusted partner to many companies in the heat treatment industry, our research and development goals and activities are inspired by market and customer insights and industry trends and challenges. The expert editions on various heat treatment processes reflect the latest developments.
    [Show full text]
  • Precipitation Hardening of Metal Alloys
    Precipitation Hardening of Metal Alloys Precipitation hardening, or age hardening, provides to look; following Merica, new age-hardening alloys one of the most widely used mechanisms for the came in a flood.” strengthening of metal alloys. The fundamental under- The importance of the theoretical suggestion for the standing and basis for this technique was established in development of new alloys is clear from the historical early work at the U. S. Bureau of Standards on an alloy record [5]. At the end of the 19th century, cast iron was known as Duralumin [1,2]. Duralumin is an aluminum the only important commercial alloy not already known alloy containing copper and magnesium with small to western technology at the time of the Romans. When amounts of iron and silicon. In an attempt to understand age hardening of aluminum was discovered accidentally the dramatic strengthening of this alloy, Paul D. Merica by Wilm [6], during the years 1903-1911, it quickly and his coworkers studied both the effect of various heat became an important commercial alloy under the trade treatments on the hardness of the alloy and the influence name Duralumin. of chemical composition on the hardness. Among the The two NBS studies published in 1919 explored both most significant of their findings was the observation the application of phase diagrams to the phenomenon that the solubility of CuAl2 in aluminum increased with and the consequences of various heat treatments on the increasing temperature. Although the specific phases subsequent time evolution of mechanical properties. responsible for the hardening turned out to be too small The latter study tentatively concluded that age harden- to be observed directly, optical examination of the ing of aluminum was a room-temperature precipitation microstructures provided an identification of several of phenomenon and suggested that it should be possible for the other phases that were present.
    [Show full text]
  • Hardening of Powder Metallurgy Parts
    Hardening of Powder Metallurgy Parts 101 Definitions and hardening methods used with powder metallurgy are described to provide a basic understanding of the nuances associated with the process. By Richard H. Slattery Powder metallurgy (PM) is unique in that one has the ability to create a process system (alloy, process steps, and secondary operations) specific to the requirements of a given application. The following is a brief overview of the key terminology associated with the harden- ing of PM parts. DEFINITIONS PParticle Hardness Versus Apparent Hardness Any hardened PM part will have both an apparent and particle hardness. The apparent or macrohardness is a composite value with the key Figure 1: MPIF FLNC 4408, sinter hard microstructure, 75 to 80 percent martensitic influences being part density and particle hardness. This is best described as a measure of yield strength. Case Versus Core Hardness The particle or microhardness is the measure of hardness, at a micro Often with case-hardened parts, there will be separate hardness speci- level, in the hard phase (martensitic region) of the microstructure. fications for both the case and the core of the component. These are This is best described as a measure of wear resistance. Note: Particle typically particle hardness specifications, but this should always be hardness is unaffected by density. confirmed with the customer. The case region is the outer “skin” of 26 | Thermal Processing TP-2017-0506.indb 26 4/25/17 10:09 AM (a) (b) Figure 2: (a) Case, sharp acicular martensite needles; (b) Outer core, lath martensite Figure 3: MPIF FLN2 4405, carburized microstructure, through-hardened, fully martensitic with nickel-rich regions the part and is typically about 0.010-0.015 hardness.
    [Show full text]
  • Plate MTD® and Tool Steels: for Mold, Tool and Die Applications
    ArcelorMittal USA Plate MTD® and Tool Steels: for Mold, Tool and Die Applications Introduction ArcelorMittal USA MTD® Steels ArcelorMittal USA Tool Steels ArcelorMittal USA MTD steels com- ArcelorMittal USA produces the tool steels A2, A8 Mod., O1, S5, and prise a family of five pre-hardened S7** for use in applications where an air-hardening, oil-hardening alloy plate steels developed for a or shock-resisting tool steel is required. These steels are available variety of mold, tool and die ap- from ArcelorMittal USA in full-sized, annealed plates suitable for plications. These steels have been saw cutting and/or finishing. Parts can subsequently be machined available for over 20 years and pos- and heat treated to a range of hardness requirements. For improved sess the flexibility of the AISI 41XX internal cleanliness, all ArcelorMittal USA tool steels are produced steels. They are available in the with maximum sulfur levels of 0.010%, using Fineline® processing. 262-321 Brinell range* (unless otherwise noted) for optimum bal- These steels are also available as ArcelorMittal USA Finishline™, a ance between machinability and hardness. The use of pre-hardened prefinished plate product with decarb-free top and bottom surfaces MTD® steels eliminates the need for and risk associated with heat ground to a maximum 125 RMS. treating molds, holder blocks and other parts after machining. MTD * Brinell hardness (HB) readings are taken from standard test locations on the plate plates are routinely saw cut. surface after the decarburization layer is removed. This range of HB converts to 27-34 Rockwell “C”. ArcelorMittal USA uses HB measurement as its official test.
    [Show full text]
  • Specifics of Induction Hardening of Powder Metallurgy (P/M) Components
    INDUCTION THOUGHTS INDUCTIONINDUCTION THOUGHTSTHOUGHTS Dr. Valery Rudnev, known as “Professor Induction”, discusses in the heat processing diffe- rent aspects of induction heating, novel theoretical and practical knowledge related to dif- ferent heat treating technologies accumulated in the North America and around the globe. Specifics of induction hardening of powder metallurgy (P/M) components uring the last decade, the use of advanced powder metallurgy type of heat treatment. However, differences in electromagnetic D(P/M) materials in several industries has been expanded at properties are specific for processing those materials applying an impressive pace further penetrating markets of demanding electromagnetic induction. Table 1 summarizes the effect of applications; however, the biggest market for ferrous P/M com- density reduction and porosity increase on IH. ponents remains to be the transportation industry, particularly The relative magnetic permeability μr of P/M materials is consid- the automotive and agricultural sectors. An ability to manufacture erably lower than the μr of the corresponding wrought steels, while net-shape complex geometries offering competitive performance their electrical resistivities ρ are greater to some extent. Both factors at an economical cost is an attractive feature of P/M parts (e. g. gears, lead to noticeably larger current penetration depth (δ) during the timing sprockets, cams, splined hubs, shafts, shock absorbers etc.) heating cycle, affecting not only heat generation and temperature [1]. Density and porosity in the sintered compact are major factors profiles but also the magnitude and distribution of transient and affecting strength and hardenability of ferrous P/M materials; both residual stresses as well as coil electrical parameters.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Hardening Basics: Nitrocarburizing Vs. Carbonitriding
    Case Hardening Basics: Nitrocarburizing vs. Carbonitriding The terms sound alike and often cause confusion, but nitrocarburizing and carbonitriding are distinct heat-treating processes that have their advantages depending on the material used and the intended finished quality of a part. By Rob Simons Confusion surrounding the case-hardening benefits that result from their uses, includ- triding both make a workpiece surface harder techniques of nitrocarburizing and carbo- ing cutting down on the confusion to help by imparting carbon, or carbon and nitrogen, nitriding prove the point that it’s easy to manufacturers better understand what goes to its surface. get lost in the nomenclature behind heat- on in the heat treater’s furnaces. Metallurgist Adolph Machlet developed treating processes. nitriding by accident in 1906. That year, he That comes with the territory. Metallurgy CASE HARDENING applied for a patent that called for replacing is complicated. Case hardening2 refers to the “case” that atmosphere air in a furnace with ammonia But there’s value to explaining the dif- develops around a part subjected to a harden- to avoid oxidation of steel parts. Shortly C 1 ferences between these techniques and the ing treatment. Nitrocarburizing and carboni- after he sent the patent application off, he 30 | Thermal Processing CARBONITRIDING (It’s done between 975 and 1,125 degrees During carbonitriding, parts are heated in a Fahrenheit.) Within that temperature range, sealed chamber well into the austenitic range nitrogen atoms are soluble in iron, but the — about 1,600 degrees Fahrenheit — before risk of distortion is decreased. Due to their nitrogen and carbon are added.
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Hardening of Steels: Understanding the Basics (#06952G)
    © 2002 ASM International. All Rights Reserved. www.asminternational.org Surface Hardening of Steels: Understanding the Basics (#06952G) Surface Hardening of Steels Understanding the Basics Edited by J.R. Davis Davis & Associates ASM International Materials Park, OH 44073-0002 www.asminternational.org © 2002 ASM International. All Rights Reserved. www.asminternational.org Surface Hardening of Steels: Understanding the Basics (#06952G) Copyright © 2002 by ASM International® All rights reserved No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the writ- ten permission of the copyright owner. First printing, November 2002 Great care is taken in the compilation and production of this book, but it should be made clear that NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, ARE GIVEN IN CONNECTION WITH THIS PUBLICATION. Although this information is believed to be accurate by ASM, ASM cannot guarantee that favorable results will be obtained from the use of this publication alone. This publication is intended for use by persons having tech- nical skill, at their sole discretion and risk. Since the conditions of product or material use are out- side of ASM's control, ASM assumes no liability or obligation in connection with any use of this information. No claim of any kind, whether as to products or information in this publication, and whether or not based on negligence, shall be greater in amount than the purchase price of this product or publication in respect of which damages are claimed.
    [Show full text]
  • International Steel Group Inc. ISG the Future of American Steel
    International Steel Group Inc. ISG The Future of American Steel 2003 ANNUAL REPORT This Is ISG Although many perceive the challenges that face today’s steel industry to be great, we think these are exciting times full of opportunity. Our strength lies in individuals that commit themselves to providing a quality product at a competitive cost with a focus on our customer’s needs. Our newly forged relationship with the USWA is a partnership reinforcing ISG’s commitment to the resurgence of the steel industry. We look forward to shaping the future with you. Our employees are what distinguishes ISG‘‘ from the competition. By empowering our employees, ISG has built a new operating culture emphasizing individual performance and accountability. TO OUR SHAREHOLDERS: ‘‘ 2003 was a very successful year for ISG and our prospects for the future are exciting. It is gratifying that in less than two years of operation, our Company already is a widely recog- nized leader in the steel industry as a result of our rapid growth and financial performance. The reason for our excitement is that we believe we have developed the right formula for success. Our philosophy is to acquire assets with minimum liabilities and strong potential value, forge strong and productive relationships with labor, operate efficiently and provide high-quality, value-added products to the marketplace. The success of this formula allows us to say with confidence that ISG represents the future of American steel. Our acquisition of Bethlehem Steel in May and our initial public offering in December were two major steps in our effort to build a strong and profitable company for the long Rodney B.
    [Show full text]