Amphibian Surveys Reveal No Instances of Batrachochytrium Dendrobatidis and Suggest Low Prevalence of Chytrid Fungus in Thailand

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Amphibian Surveys Reveal No Instances of Batrachochytrium Dendrobatidis and Suggest Low Prevalence of Chytrid Fungus in Thailand 290 AMPHIBIAN AND REPTILE DISEASES Herpetological Review, 2019, 50(2), 290–298. © 2019 by Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles Amphibian Surveys Reveal No Instances of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis and Suggest Low Prevalence of Chytrid Fungus in Thailand Chytridiomycosis, the amphibian infectious disease caused by the fungal organism Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd), occurs globally with high prevalence and has been implicated in the population declines of amphibians in Africa (Hopkins and Channing 2003), Australia (Berger et al. 1998), Central America (Berger et al. 1998), Europe (Bosch et al. 2001), North America (Vredenburg et al. 2010), and South America (de Queiroz Carnaval et al. 2006). However, studies on the prevalence of Bd in East Asian amphibians present a different story—surveys conducted in parts of China, Japan, and the Korean peninsula have found low prevalence of Bd and have observed few negative effects on individuals that have tested positive for Bd (e.g., Goka et al. 2009; Swei et al. 2011; Bai et al. 2012; Bataille et al. 2013). Additionally, when sequencing the Bd strains found in the region, high diversity of Bd haplotypes were detected across sampling localities, suggesting that Bd has been evolving in the region for an extended period (Bai et al. 2012; Bataille et al. 2013). Recently, whole-genome sequencing of 234 isolates of Bd revealed a hyperdiverse East Asian Bd lineage with the highest SNP diversity found in wild South Korean frogs (O’Hanlon et al. 2018). Based on subsequent demographic and diversification analyses, it is hypothesized that Bd originated in the Korean Peninsula and spread globally throughout the 20th century (O’Hanlon et al. 2018). Nevertheless, there remain several regions of the globe that have not been well tested for Bd presence; this lack of data hinders our understanding of the origin, direction, and timing of the pathogen’s global spread. Additionally, without Bd prevalence data, it is difficult to develop strategies for conservation and disease management of sensitive species or habitats. One of ELYSE S. FREITAS* Sam Noble Oklahoma Museum of Natural History, University of Oklahoma, 2401 Chautauqua Ave, Norman, Oklahoma 73072, USA; Department of Biology, University of Oklahoma, 730 Van Vleet Oval, Norman, Oklahoma 73019, USA ATTAPOL RUJIRAWAN NATEE AMPAI PIYAWAN PUANPRAPAI SIRIPORN YODTHONG KORKHWAN TERMPRAYOON Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, 50 Ngam Wong Wan Rd, Chatuchak, Bangkok, 10900 Thailand CAMERON D. SILER Sam Noble Oklahoma Museum of Natural History, University of Oklahoma, 2401 Chautauqua Ave, Norman, Oklahoma 73072, USA; Department of Biology, University of Oklahoma, 730 Van Vleet Oval, Norman, Oklahoma 73019, USA ANCHALEE AOWPHOL Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, FIG. 1. Map of Thailand showing locations where amphibians were 50 Ngam Wong Wan Rd, Chatuchak, Bangkok, 10900 Thailand sampled for Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (black circles show specific localities, orange regions show the sampled provinces). The *Corresponding author; e-mail: [email protected] inset map shows Southeast Asia with Thailand highlighted in pink. Herpetological Review 50(2), 2019 AMPHIBIAN AND REPTILE DISEASES 291 (241 species) in mainland Southeast Asia (AmphibiaWeb 2018). Therefore, understanding the prevalence of Bd in Thailand is critical for higher-level analyses of the pathogen’s prevalence and distribution across Southeast Asia. There have been three studies to date on the occurrence of Bd in Thailand: 1) McLeod et al. (2008) examined histological samples from 123 fluid-preserved historical museum specimens housed at the Natural History Museum of Chulalongkorn University in Bangkok, representing 28 species from localities across the country, and found no instances of Bd infection; 2) Vörös et al. (2012) tested skin swabs of six individuals of the toad Ingerophrynus parvus at the Prince of Songkla University Protected Area in southern Thailand and found one individual that was positive for Bd, suggesting an overall high prevalence of disease in that region, albeit with limited sampling; 3) Techangamsuwan et al. (2017) tested skin swabs of 259 wild- caught amphibians and 233 captive amphibians at zoos and parks across Thailand, including a zoo near Prince of Songkla University, and found Bd presence only in captive non-native species. Here, we present the first study investigating the prevalence of chytrid fungus on wild amphibians in non- protected areas in northern and southern Thailand using the most comprehensive spatial sampling effort to date. We conducted amphibian surveys in five provinces in northern Thailand in March 2017 and in three provinces in southern Thailand in June 2017 (Fig. 1). In general, sampling was opportunistic and occurred as part of biodiversity surveys targeting northern and southern Thailand amphibian species for vouchered phylogenetic analyses. All surveys were carried out after dark between 1900–2130 h, and temperature and humidity measurements were taken at the start of each sampling period with a Kestrel 2000 pocket weather meter (Kestrel Instruments, FIG. 2. Map of Thailand showing gradients in: A) annual mean Boothwyn, Pennsylvania, USA). For samples collected in temperature; B) annual temperature differential (difference between northern Thailand, the temperature and relative humidity for the maximum temperature and the minimum temperature; C) annual mean precipitation; and D) the mean precipitation of the each sampling locality ranged from 21.3–32.2°C and 27.4–70.1%, warmest month. Northern Thailand has an overall higher temperature respectively, and in southern Thailand measured 20.3–30.0°C differential and lower precipitation than southern Thailand. Data and 68.7–100%, respectively. Amphibians were captured by from WorldClim (2017). hand, placed into individual plastic bags to avoid potential cross-contamination of individuals, and euthanized the same these understudied regions is Southeast Asia. Despite comprising night of capture with an injection of MS-222 (Conroy et al. four major biodiversity hotspots (Myers et al. 2000), there is a 2009). After euthanization, each individual was rinsed briefly paucity of studies on Bd prevalence across the region (but see with tap water to remove any loose debris and mud on the body Diesmos et al. 2012 [Philippines]; Rowley et al. 2013 [Cambodia that may have interfered with our ability to detect Bd (i.e., PCR and Vietnam]; and LeBlanc et al. 2014 [Peninsular Malaysia], inhibitors). We acknowledge that this may have decreased our which suggested extremely low Bd prevalence; and Chong et al. ability to detect Bd in an individual with low loads of infection 2018 [Singapore], which suggested moderate Bd prevalence). (Brem et al. 2007). Individuals were swabbed with a sterile, The most thorough survey of Southeast Asia to date, conducted rayon-tipped swab (Medical Wire; Corsham, Wiltshire, England) by Swei et al. (2011), found that only 1.4% of more than 2,800 ten times each on the dorsum, venter, medial surface of the individuals tested positive for Bd, with positive samples found in left thigh, left foot webbing, throat, and mouth (juveniles and Indonesia (0.25% infection rate), Laos (0.73%), Malaysia (0.90%), adults) or ten times on the oral disc (tadpoles) (modified from and the Philippines (8.01%). Hyatt et al. 2007). A control swab was dipped and swirled in Despite the high numbers of samples collected throughout the tap water used for rinsing and tested for chytrid to ensure Southeast Asia by Swei et al. (2011), sampling was opportunistic that there was no contamination of individuals from the water and large areas of the region were missed, including Thailand. source—all control swabs tested negative for chytrid. Each swab The general paucity of countrywide data regarding Bd prevalence was then placed into individual 1.5-ml Eppendorf tubes and in Thailand is surprising given its unique and complex allowed to dry unsealed for an hour, before being stored after biogeography. Within Southeast Asia, Thailand represents a the completion of field surveys in a -20°C freezer until extracted. major biogeographic transition zone between Indochinese and We sexed each specimen via gonadal inspection and vouchered South Asian species in the north and Sunda Shelf species in the individuals at the Zoological Museum of Kasetsart University, south (Woodruff 2003; Parnell 2013), making it an important Bangkok, Thailand (ZMKU). Extractions of Bd DNA were done region for biodiversity. Currently, there are 145 species of at the Sam Noble Museum Genomics Core Facility (University amphibians recognized in the country, second only to Vietnam of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, USA) with PrepMan Ultra Herpetological Review 50(2), 2019 292 AMPHIBIAN AND REPTILE DISEASES TABLE 1. The number of amphibian individuals for each age class (tadpole, juvenile, adult) and sex (male, female) sampled for Batrachochy- trium dendrobatidis (Bd) at each locality in Thailand (coordinates; elevation). The localities are listed in the chronological order that they were sampled. The right column shows the calculated 95% confidence interval for the maximum potential Bd prevalence in each species for each locality, given the sample size, and for each locality, given the total number of individuals sampled. Locality Species Tadpole Juvenile Adult Adult Max. chytrid male female prevalence in population (%) 19 March 2017: Tak Province: Mae Sot Duttaphrynus melanostictus
Recommended publications
  • Journal of Social Science and Cultural P-ISSN: 2697-6269  4 1 ( 2563)
    วารสารสังคมศาสตรละวัฒนธรรม Journal of Social Science and Cultural P-ISSN: 2697-6269 4 ฉบับท 1 (ราคม - มิถุนา 2563) { วัตถุประสงค วารสารสังคมศาสตรละวัฒนธรรม เปวารสารวิช มีวัตถุประสงคพื่อสงเสริม การศึกษาคนควา และเพื่อเผยแพรบทความวิจัยและบทความวิชาการแกนักวิจัย นักวิชาการ คณาจารย นิสิตนักศึกษา และคณะคร ในมิติทางดนพระพุทธศาสน วัฒนธ สังคมศาสตร ศิลปศาสตร มนุษยศาสตร พัฒนาสังคม พัฒนาชุมชน และสหวิทยาการดานสังคมศาสตรและ วัฒนธ บทความที่ตีพิมพเผยแพรในวารสารไดผานการพิจารณาจากผูทรงคุณวุฒิ อยางนอย 2 ทาน เปดรับบทความทั้งภาษาไทยและภาษาอังกฤษ โดยรับพิจารณาตีพิมพตนฉบับของ บุคคลทั้งภายในและภายนอกโรงเรียน ผลงานที่สงมาจะตองไมเคยตีพิมพหรืออยูระหวางการ พิจารณาจากผูทรงคุณวุฒิเพื่อตีพิมพในวารสารอื่น ผูเขียนบทความจะตองปฏิบัติตาม หลักเกณฑการเสนอบทความวิชาการหรือบทความวิจัยเพื่อตีพิมพในวารสาร อยางเครงครั รวมทั้งระบบการองอิงตงเปไปตามหลักเกณฑของวารสาร ทัศนะและขอคิดเห็นที่ปรากฏในบทความวารสาร ถือเปนความรับผิดชอบของผูเขียน บทความนั้น มิใชความคิดของคณะผูจัดทำ และไมถือเปนทัศนะและความรับผิดชอบของกอง บรรณาธิก ทั้งนี้กองบรรณาธิการไมงวนลิขสิทธิ์ในการคัดลอ แตหงอิงแสดงที่มา กำหนดออกวารสารปะ 2 ( 6 เดือ) 1 เดือ มก – มิถุนายน 2 เดือ กรกฎาคม – ธันวาคม ข Journal of Social Science and Cultural Vol.4 No.1 (January - June 2020) { ง โรงเรียนพระปริยัติธรรมสามัญวัดสระเรียง 572 ถนนราชดำเนิน ตำบลในเมือ อำเภอเมือ จังหวัดนครศรีธรรมราช 80000 โ. 061-5262919 โทรสาร. 075-340-042 E-mail : [email protected] { ที่ปรึกษา พระเทพปญาสุธี รองอธิการบด มหาวิทยาลัยมหาจุฬาลงกรณราชวิทยาลัย วิทยาเขตนครศรีธรรมราช พระครูพรหมเขตคณารักษ, . เจอาวาสวัดวังตะวัน รักษาการเจคณะอำเภอเฉลิมพระเกียรติ ยการโรงเรียนพระปริยัติธรรมสามัญวัดสระเรียง
    [Show full text]
  • Reproductive Biology of the Assam Forest Frog, Hydrophylax Leptoglossa
    WWW.IRCF.ORG/REPTILESANDAMPHIBIANSJOURNALTABLE OF CONTENTS IRCF REPTILES & IRCFAMPHIBIANS REPTILES • VOL 15,& NAMPHIBIANSO 4 • DEC 2008 •189 25(2):139–141 • AUG 2018 IRCF REPTILES & AMPHIBIANS CONSERVATION AND NATURAL HISTORY TABLE OF CONTENTS FEATURE ARTICLES Reproductive. Chasing Bullsnakes (Pituophis catenifer Biology sayi) in Wisconsin: of the Assam Forest On the Road to Understanding the Ecology and Conservation of the Midwest’s Giant Serpent ...................... Joshua M. Kapfer 190 Frog,. The SharedHydrophylax History of Treeboas (Corallus grenadensis) and leptoglossaHumans on Grenada: (Cope 1868) A Hypothetical Excursion ............................................................................................................................Robert W. Henderson 198 RESEARCH(Anura: ARTICLES Ranidae), from Lawachara . The Texas Horned Lizard in Central and Western Texas ....................... Emily Henry, Jason Brewer, Krista Mougey, and Gad Perry 204 . The Knight Anole (Anolis equestris) in Florida .............................................NationalBrian J. Camposano, Park, Kenneth L. Krysko, Kevin Bangladesh M. Enge, Ellen M. Donlan, and Michael Granatosky 212 CONSERVATIONMd. Mokhlesur ALERT Rahman, Md. Fazle Rabbe, and Md. Mahabub Alam . World’s Mammals in Crisis ............................................................................................................................................................. 220 . More ThanDepartment Mammals of..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Contracted Garage
    Contracted Garage No Branch Province District Garage Name Truck Contact Number Address 035-615-990, 089- 140/2 Rama 3 Road, Bang Kho Laem Sub-district, Bang Kho Laem District, 1 Headquarters Ang Thong Mueang P Auto Image Co., Ltd. 921-2400 Bangkok, 10120 188 Soi 54 Yaek 4 Rama 2 Road, Samae Dam Sub-district, Bang Khun Thian 2 Headquarters Ang Thong Mueang Thawee Car Care Center Co., Ltd. 035-613-545 District, Bangkok, 10150 02-522-6166-8, 086- 3 Headquarters Bangkok Bang Khen Sathitpon Aotobody Co., Ltd. 102/8 Thung Khru Sub-district, Thung Khru District, Bangkok, 10140 359-7466 02-291-1544, 081- 4 Headquarters Bangkok Bang Kho Laem Au Supphalert Co., Ltd. 375 Phet kasem Road, Tha Phra Sub-district, Bangkok Yai District, Bangkok, 10600 359-2087 02-415-1577, 081- 109/26 Moo 6 Nawamin 74 Road Khlong Kum Sub-district Bueng Kum district 5 Headquarters Bangkok Bang Khun Thian Ch.thanabodyauto Co., Ltd. 428-5084 Bangkok, 10230 02-897-1123-8, 081- 307/201 Charansanitwong Road, Bang Khun Si Sub-district, Bangkok Noi District, 6 Headquarters Bangkok Bang Khun Thian Saharungroj Service (2545) Co., Ltd. 624-5461 Bangkok, 10700 02-896-2992-3, 02- 4/431-3 Moo 1, Soi Sakae Ngam 25, Rama 2 Road, Samae Dam 7 Headquarters Bangkok Bang Khun Thian Auychai Garage Co., Ltd. 451-3715 Sub-district, Bang Khun Thien District, Bangkok, 10150 02-451-6334, 8 Headquarters Bangkok Bang Khun Thian Car Circle and Service Co., Ltd. 495 Hathairat Road, Bang, Khlong Sam Wa District, Bangkok, 10510 02-451-6927-28 02-911-5001-3, 02- 9 Headquarters Bangkok Bang Sue Au Namchai TaoPoon Co., Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • SPECIAL EDITION Tim Halliday: Amphibian Ambassador
    Issue 120 (November 2018) ISSN: 1026-0269 eISSN: 1817-3934 Volume 26, number 1 www.amphibians.orgFrogLog Promoting Conservation, Research and Education for the World’s Amphibians SPECIAL EDITION Tim Halliday: Amphibian Ambassador Rediscovering Hope for the Longnose Harlequin Frog Why We Need More Amphibian-Focused Protected Areas Pseudophilautus hallidayi. Photo: Nayana Wijayathilaka. ... and so much more! FrogLog 26 (1), Number 120 (November 2018) | 1 FrogLog CONTENTS 3 Editorial TIM HALLIDAY: AMPHIBIAN AMBASSADOR 5 Reflections on the DAPTF 15 Leading by Example 7 Newt Scientist 16 Fish Became Newts… 8 Tim Halliday—The Red-Shoed Amphibian Professor 17 An International Ambassador for Amphibians 9 Bringing Worldwide Amphibian Declines into the Public 18 “I’m sorry I missed your talk…” Domain 19 Tim Halliday and AmphibiaWeb 10 Of Newts and Frogs 20 Tim Halliday and the Conservation of Italian Newts 12 Professor Tim Halliday: Amphibians’ Best Friend 21 Tim Halliday – Amphibian Champion 13 Tim Halliday’s Love of Amphibians 22 Singing hallidayi’s…! 14 “There once was a frog from Sri Lanka…” 23 A Voice of Encouragement – Thank you Tim! NEWS FROM THE ASA & ASG 24 Funding Metamorphoses Amphibian Red Listing: An 27 Business in Key Biodiversity Areas: Minimizing the Risk Update From the Amphibian RLA to Nature 25 Photographing Frogs and Other Amphibians” Ebook 28 Amphibians in Focus (ANFoCO): Brazilian Symposium 26 ASG Brazil Restructuring Process and Current Activities on Amphibian Conservation NEWS FROM THE AMPHIBIAN COMMUNITY 29 Queensland Lab
    [Show full text]
  • General Information of Nakhon Si Thammarat
    Appendix A: General information of Nakhon Si Thammarat (Source: Tourism information from Tourism Authority of Thailand, Nakhon Si Thammarat municipality) Nakhon Si Thammarat is the second largest province in Thailand’s southern region southern edging the Gulf of Thailand. The province encompasses an area of 6,214,064 rai or 9,942.502 square kilometers. It is divided into 21 districts (amphurs) and 2 sub-districts. The capital city of Nakhon Si Thammarat is 780 kilometers from south of Bangkok.The capital is know locally as “Muang Nakhon”’ and was the center of an ancient and highly sophisticated civilization Boundary The boundary to the north is Surat Thani and Gulf of Thailand, to the south are Phatthalung and Songkla. The east of Nakhon Si Thammarat consist of 225 kilometer long The Gulf of Thailand coast with beaches, while the west are Trang and Krabi. Distances from Nakhon Si Thammarat to nearby provinces: Surat Thani 134 kilometers Trang 123 kilometers 144 145 Phatthalung 112 kilometers Songkla 161 kilometers Krabi 233 kilometers Phuket 366 kilometers Climate There are two seasons in Nakhon Si Thammarat because of influencing from Southwest monsoon and northeast monsoon. Summer is from February to April. Rainy season is from May to January. Average temperature is 27-28 °c, and it is slightly cooler in rainy season. Historical background of Nakhon Si Thammarat Nakhon Si Thammarat is an ancient city with a large community that is at least 1,500 year old. The existence of the province has appeared in various documents and dispatches since the 6th-7th Buddhist century under different names such as Tambralinga, Tan Ma Ling, Lochac, Si Thammarat, Siri Tham Nakhon, Nakhon Ton Phra, and Ligor.
    [Show full text]
  • Red List of Bangladesh 2015
    Red List of Bangladesh Volume 1: Summary Chief National Technical Expert Mohammad Ali Reza Khan Technical Coordinator Mohammad Shahad Mahabub Chowdhury IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature Bangladesh Country Office 2015 i The designation of geographical entitles in this book and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature concerning the legal status of any country, territory, administration, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The biodiversity database and views expressed in this publication are not necessarily reflect those of IUCN, Bangladesh Forest Department and The World Bank. This publication has been made possible because of the funding received from The World Bank through Bangladesh Forest Department to implement the subproject entitled ‘Updating Species Red List of Bangladesh’ under the ‘Strengthening Regional Cooperation for Wildlife Protection (SRCWP)’ Project. Published by: IUCN Bangladesh Country Office Copyright: © 2015 Bangladesh Forest Department and IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holders, provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holders. Citation: Of this volume IUCN Bangladesh. 2015. Red List of Bangladesh Volume 1: Summary. IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature, Bangladesh Country Office, Dhaka, Bangladesh, pp. xvi+122. ISBN: 978-984-34-0733-7 Publication Assistant: Sheikh Asaduzzaman Design and Printed by: Progressive Printers Pvt.
    [Show full text]
  • Attheyella (Canthosella) Thailandica Sp. Nov. (Copepoda, Harpacticoida
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal Subterranean Biology 37: 57–73 (2021) doi: 10.3897/subtbiol.37.55376 RESEARCH ARTICLE Subterranean Published by https://subtbiol.pensoft.net The International Society Biology for Subterranean Biology Attheyella (Canthosella) thailandica sp. nov. (Copepoda, Harpacticoida, Canthocamptidae) from caves in Thailand Santi Watiroyram1 1 Division of Biology, Faculty of Science, Nakhon Phanom University, Nakhon Phanom 48000, Thailand Corresponding author: Santi Watiroyram ([email protected]) Academic editor: Sanda Iepure | Received 12 June 2020 | Accepted 16 November 2020 | Published 28 January 2021 http://zoobank.org/BFA1D6C0-BB58-4EFD-9E66-524BA6019073 Citation: Watiroyram S (2021) Attheyella (Canthosella) thailandica sp. nov. (Copepoda, Harpacticoida, Canthocamptidae) from caves in Thailand. Subterranean Biology 37: 57–73. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.37.55376 Abstract During this sampling campaign, the canthocamptid Attheyella (Canthosella) thailandica sp. nov. was col- lected from various caves in Thailand. The new species is widely distributed in the country and favours habitats, such as phytotelmata and wet soil. Attheyella (Canthosella) thailandica sp. nov. is the second member of the genus to be found in Thailand, after Attheyella (Canthosella) vietnamica Borutzky (1967), which is most similar to it. Amongst Asian species, both A. (C.) thailandica sp. nov. and A. (C.) vietnamica have identical setal formulae, with a greater number of armatures on the distal endopods of legs 2–4. However, A. (C.) thailandica sp. nov. markedly differs from A. (C.) vietnamica in the insertion point of the dorsal seta and the presence of inner spinules on the caudal ramus. Additionally, the leg 4 endopod is two-segmented in A.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    BIODIVERSITAS ISSN: 1412-033X Volume 20, Number 9, September 2019 E-ISSN: 2085-4722 Pages: 2718-2732 DOI: 10.13057/biodiv/d200937 Species diversity and prey items of amphibians in Yoddom Wildlife Sanctuary, northeastern Thailand PRAPAIPORN THONGPROH1,♥, PRATEEP DUENGKAE2,♥♥, PRAMOTE RATREE3,♥♥♥, EKACHAI PHETCHARAT4,♥♥♥♥, WASSANA KINGWONGSA5,♥♥♥♥♥, WEEYAWAT JAITRONG6,♥♥♥♥♥♥, YODCHAIY CHUAYNKERN1,♥♥♥♥♥♥♥, CHANTIP CHUAYNKERN1,♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ 1Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Khon Kaen University, Mueang Khon Kaen, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand. Tel.: +6643-202531, email: [email protected]; email: [email protected]; email: [email protected] 2Special Research Unit for Wildlife Genomics (SRUWG), Department of Forest Biology, Faculty of Forestry, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand. email: [email protected] 3Protected Areas Regional Office 9 Ubon Ratchathani, Mueang Ubon Ratchathani, Ubon Ratchathani, 34000, Thailand. email: [email protected] 4Royal Initiative Project for Developing Security in the Area of Dong Na Tam Forest, Sri Mueang Mai, Ubon Ratchathani, 34250, Thailand. email: [email protected] 5Center of Study Natural and Wildlife, Nam Yuen, Ubon Ratchathani, 34260, Thailand. email: [email protected] 6Thailand Natural History Museum, National Science Museum, Technopolis, Khlong 5, Khlong Luang, Pathum Thani, 12120, Thailand, email: [email protected] Manuscript received: 25 July 2019. Revision accepted: 28 August 2019. Abstract. Thongproh P, Duengkae P, Ratree P, Phetcharat E, Kingwongsa W, Jaitrong W, Chuaynkern Y, Chuaynkern C. 2019. Species diversity and prey items of amphibians in Yoddom Wildlife Sanctuary, northeastern Thailand. Biodiversitas 20: 2718-2732. Amphibian occurrence within Yoddom Wildlife Sanctuary, which is located along the border region among Thailand, Cambodia, and Laos, is poorly understood. To determine amphibian diversity within the sanctuary, we conducted daytime and nocturnal surveys from 2014 to 2017 within six management units.
    [Show full text]
  • Prey Items of Some Amphibians and Reptiles in Phu Khieo-Nam Nao Forest Complex, Northeastern Thailand
    BIODIVERSITAS ISSN: 1412-033X Volume 21, Number 9, September 2020 E-ISSN: 2085-4722 Pages: 4124-4130 DOI: 10.13057/biodiv/d210925 Prey items of some amphibians and reptiles in Phu Khieo-Nam Nao Forest Complex, northeastern Thailand PRAPAIPORN THONGPROH1,♥, JIDAPA CHUNSKUL1,♥♥, PEERASIT RONGCHAPHO1, CHANTIP CHUAYNKERN1,♥♥♥, YODCHAIY CHUAYNKERN1,♥♥♥♥, RUTTAPON SRISONCHAI1, CHIRAWUTH SAENGSRI2, PREEYA AONPIME3, RATCHATA PHOCHAYAVANICH3,♥♥♥♥♥, PERMSAK KANISHTHAJATA4, SAMRET PHUSAENSRI5, SUTHIN PROMPALAD6, SATAPHON TONGPUN7, JIRACHAI ARKAJAG7, PRATEEP DUENGKAE8,♥♥♥♥♥♥ 1Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Khon Kaen University. 123 Mittraparb Road, Nai-Meuang, Meuang, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand. Tel.: +66-43-202531, ♥email: [email protected]; ♥♥[email protected]; ♥♥♥[email protected]; ♥♥♥♥[email protected] 2Thairakpa Foundation. Vibhavadi Rangsit Rd., Thung Song Hong, Bangkok 10210, Thailand 3Faculty of Interdisciplinary Studies, Khon Kaen University Nongkhai Campus. Nong Khai 43000, Thailand. ♥♥♥♥♥ email: [email protected] 4Phu Luang Wildlife Sanctuary. Phu Rue, Loei 42160, Thailand 5Phu Wiang National Park. Wiang Kao, Khon Kaen 40150, Thailand 6Nam Nao National Park. Nam Nao, Phetchabun 67260, Thailand 7Phu Luang Wildlife Research Station. Phu Rue, Loei 42160, Thailand 8Department of Forest Biology, Faculty of Forestry, Kasetsart University. 50 Phahonyothin Rd, Lat Yao, Chatuchak, Bangkok 10900, Thailand. ♥♥♥♥♥♥email: [email protected] Manuscript received: 20 July 2020. Revision accepted: 14 August 2020. Abstract. Thongproh P, Chunskul J, Rongchapho P, Chuaynkern C, Chuaynkern Y, Srisonchai R, Saengsri C, Aonpime P, Phochayavanich R, Kanishthajata P, Phusaensri S, Prompalad S, Tongpun S, Arkajag J, Duengkae P. 2020. Prey items of some amphibians and reptiles in Phu Khieo-Nam Nao Forest Complex, Northeastern Thailand. Biodiversitas 21: 4124-4130.
    [Show full text]
  • Gekkotan Lizard Taxonomy
    3% 5% 2% 4% 3% 5% H 2% 4% A M A D R Y 3% 5% A GEKKOTAN LIZARD TAXONOMY 2% 4% D ARNOLD G. KLUGE V O 3% 5% L 2% 4% 26 NO.1 3% 5% 2% 4% 3% 5% 2% 4% J A 3% 5% N 2% 4% U A R Y 3% 5% 2 2% 4% 0 0 1 VOL. 26 NO. 1 JANUARY, 2001 3% 5% 2% 4% INSTRUCTIONS TO CONTRIBUTORS Hamadryad publishes original papers dealing with, but not necessarily restricted to, the herpetology of Asia. Re- views of books and major papers are also published. Manuscripts should be only in English and submitted in triplicate (one original and two copies, along with three cop- ies of all tables and figures), printed or typewritten on one side of the paper. Manuscripts can also be submitted as email file attachments. Papers previously published or submitted for publication elsewhere should not be submitted. Final submissions of accepted papers on disks (IBM-compatible only) are desirable. For general style, contributors are requested to examine the current issue of Hamadryad. Authors with access to publication funds are requested to pay US$ 5 or equivalent per printed page of their papers to help defray production costs. Reprints cost Rs. 2.00 or 10 US cents per page inclusive of postage charges, and should be ordered at the time the paper is accepted. Major papers exceeding four pages (double spaced typescript) should contain the following headings: Title, name and address of author (but not titles and affiliations), Abstract, Key Words (five to 10 words), Introduction, Material and Methods, Results, Discussion, Acknowledgements, Literature Cited (only the references cited in the paper).
    [Show full text]
  • Anura: Ranidae)
    Hamadryad Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 75 – 82 , 2000 Copyright 2000 Centre for Herpetology, Madras Crocodile Bank Trust MOLECULAR AND KARYOLOGICAL DATA ON THE SOUTH ASIAN RANID GENERA INDIRANA, NYCTIBATRACHUS AND NANNOPHRYS (ANURA: RANIDAE) Miguel Vences1,4, Stefan Wanke1, Gaetano Odierna2, Joachim Kosuch3 and Michael Veith3 1Zoologisches Forschungsinstitut und Museum Alexander Koenig, Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany. Email: [email protected] 2Dipartimento Biologia Evolutiva e Comparata, Universitá di Napoli “Federico II”, Via Mezzocannone 8, 80134 Napoli, Italy. Email: [email protected] 3Zoologisches Institut der Universität Mainz, Abteilung Ökologie, Saarstrasse 21, D55099 Mainz, Germany. Email: [email protected] 4Present address: Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Laboratoire des Reptiles et Amphibiens, 25 rue Cuvier, 75005 Paris, France. (with four text-figures) ABSTRACT.– Phylogenetic relationships of the endemic south Asian frogs of the genera Indirana, Nyctibatrachus and Nannophrys were studied using DNA sequences (a total of 880 bp) of the mitochondrial 16S and 12S rRNA genes. The topology of the obtained cladograms was largely unresolved, indicating a star-like radiation of the main ranid lineages. No molecular affinities were found between the south Asian taxa and Malagasy ranids. Nannophrys was positioned as sister group of Euphlyctis in all analyses. This grouping, which was supported by moderate to high bootstrap values, indicates that Nannophrys is an offshoot of Asian ranids, and not related to the South African cacosternines. Karyotypes were obtained for Nannophrys ceylonensis (2n = 26), N. marmorata (2n = 26), Indirana sp. (2n = 30) and I. cf. leptodactyla (2n = 24). The 2n = 30 karyotype of Indirana sp.
    [Show full text]
  • 1704632114.Full.Pdf
    Phylogenomics reveals rapid, simultaneous PNAS PLUS diversification of three major clades of Gondwanan frogs at the Cretaceous–Paleogene boundary Yan-Jie Fenga, David C. Blackburnb, Dan Lianga, David M. Hillisc, David B. Waked,1, David C. Cannatellac,1, and Peng Zhanga,1 aState Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, College of Ecology and Evolution, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510006, China; bDepartment of Natural History, Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611; cDepartment of Integrative Biology and Biodiversity Collections, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712; and dMuseum of Vertebrate Zoology and Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720 Contributed by David B. Wake, June 2, 2017 (sent for review March 22, 2017; reviewed by S. Blair Hedges and Jonathan B. Losos) Frogs (Anura) are one of the most diverse groups of vertebrates The poor resolution for many nodes in anuran phylogeny is and comprise nearly 90% of living amphibian species. Their world- likely a result of the small number of molecular markers tra- wide distribution and diverse biology make them well-suited for ditionally used for these analyses. Previous large-scale studies assessing fundamental questions in evolution, ecology, and conser- used 6 genes (∼4,700 nt) (4), 5 genes (∼3,800 nt) (5), 12 genes vation. However, despite their scientific importance, the evolutionary (6) with ∼12,000 nt of GenBank data (but with ∼80% missing history and tempo of frog diversification remain poorly understood. data), and whole mitochondrial genomes (∼11,000 nt) (7). In By using a molecular dataset of unprecedented size, including 88-kb the larger datasets (e.g., ref.
    [Show full text]