Kiss Me Deadly: Communism, Motherhood, and Cold War Movies Author(S): Michael Rogin Source: Representations, No

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Kiss Me Deadly: Communism, Motherhood, and Cold War Movies Author(S): Michael Rogin Source: Representations, No Kiss Me Deadly: Communism, Motherhood, and Cold War Movies Author(s): Michael Rogin Source: Representations, No. 6 (Spring, 1984), pp. 1-36 Published by: University of California Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2928536 Accessed: 04-03-2015 22:18 UTC Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. University of California Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Representations. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 169.234.53.127 on Wed, 04 Mar 2015 22:18:06 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions MICHAEL ROGIN Kiss Me Deadly: Communism,Motherhood, and Cold War Movies* I THE HISTORY of demonologyin Americanpolitics comprises three major moments.The firstis racial. "Historybegins for us withmurder and enslavement,not with discovery," wrote William Carlos Williams.' He wascalling attentionto thehistorical origins of theUnited States in violenceagainst peoples of color.The expropriationof Indianland and exploitationof blacklabor lie at theroot not only of America's economic development, but of its political conflicts and culturalidentity as well.A distinctiveAmerican political tradition, fearful of primitivism,disorder, and conspiracy,developed in responseto peoplesof color. That traditiondraws its energy from alien threatsto the Americanway of life, and sanctionsviolent and exclusionaryresponses to them.2 Classand ethnicconflict define the second demonological moment. The tar- getsof countersubversionmoved from the reds and blacksof frontier,agrarian Americato theworking-class "savages" and alien"reds" of urban,industrializing America.The defenseof civilization against savagery still derived from repressive conditionsof laboron theone handand frominternal, imperial expansion against autonomouscommunities on the other.But the termsof the struggleshifted fromracial conflict to ethnocentricclass war. The cold war introducesthe thirdmoment in Americandemonology. The SovietUnion replaced the immigrant working class as thesource of anxiety,and thecombat between workers and capitalists,immigrants and natives,was replaced byone betweenMoscow's agents (intellectuals, government employees, students and middle-classactivists) on theone hand,and a statenational security appa- ratuson theother. The classand ethnicred scare defined American politics from the 1870sto theNew Deal. The thirdmoment has had itsvicissitudes, its surges and declines;we stilllive within it. Each red (or red and black)scare has revolvedaround a differentcore: first individualfreedom, then class conflict, finally mass society and thestate. At each momentthe free man has bothdepended on and definedhimself in opposition REPRESENTATIONS 6 * Spring 1984 ? THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA This content downloaded from 169.234.53.127 on Wed, 04 Mar 2015 22:18:06 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions to his subversivetwin. The discourse of expansion and slaveryacknowledged that dependence, for proslaveryapologists made black slaverya condition for white freedom, free labor ideology counterposed itselfto slavery,and the free man created himselfin Western,Indian combat. Capitalistsdepended on work- ers,just as free men needed Indians and slaves. But the persistenceof freelabor ideology and the influxof immigrantsburied that dependence, shiftinga class opposition into an ethnicone thatpitted Americans against aliens. Defenders of the national securitystate invoked their Soviet counterpart,thus returningto antebellum America's clarityabout the source of doubleness, muddied in the industrializingage. Now, however,countersubversive doubling justified not the freeman but a centralized,secretive, inquisitorial state. Although liberals blamed McCarthyism,the rise of a security-orientedstate bureaucracy was the most importantnew factorin the modern historyof countersubversion. American historyin each countersubversivemoment has constituteditself in binaryopposition to the subversiveforce thatthreatened it. Demonology begins as a rigidinsistence on difference.That insistencehas strategicpropaganda pur- poses, but it also derives from fears of and forbidden desires for identitywith the excluded object. In countersubversivediscourse, therefore,the opposition breaks down. Its cultural and political productions register the collapse of demonological polarization in a return of the politicallyand psychologically repressed. The subversivein all three stages has threatenedthe family,property, and personal and national identity.But subversivesmelted into their surroundings as the racial and cultural differenceswhich stigmatizedthem disappeared, and the imagined danger shiftedfrom the body to the mind. Instead of representing only loss of restraintand disorder,the subversivesignified control by a sophis- ticated,alien order. That danger was met in two new ways,each of which mir- rored the enemyarrayed against it. One was the rise of the nationalsecurity state. The other was the production and surveillanceof public opinion in the media of mass society. This paper examines the representationsof American demonology in the filmsof the cold war. It analyzes movies made between 1943 and 1964, the years surroundingthe cold war consensus. These movieshelped produce thatconsen- sus. It fragmentedafter the Kennedy assassination,as we shall see, but by then it had done itswork. The 1960s antiwarmovement challenged cold war practices but did not do awaywith them. The 1980s presidentwho, as we shall see, moved frommovies to politicsin cold war Hollywood has revivedthe demonologywhich gave him politicalbirth. Cold war cinema will give us access, at its founding,to the cold war discourse withinwhich we continue to speak. As conscious anti- Communistpropaganda, and as unintentionalregister of anxiety,these movies reflected,shaped, and expessed the buried dynamics of a repressive political 2 REPRESENTATIONS This content downloaded from 169.234.53.127 on Wed, 04 Mar 2015 22:18:06 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions consciousness.They display both the cumulativehistory of American demonol- ogy,and the specifichistorical circumstances of the 1950s which placed the ob- sessions of that historyunder pressure. Like other productionsof American demonology,cold war movies sharply distinguishedsubversives from countersubversives.But the movies also made visible three developments which threatened to collapse that distinction.The firstdevelopment was the rise of the national securitystate, which counteracted Sovietinfluence by imitatingSoviet surveillance.The second, whichwe willintro- duce in part II of this essay,arose fromthe simultaneousglorification and fear of maternalinfluence within the family.The thirdwas the emergence of a mass societywhich seemed to homogenize all differenceand make subversivesdifficult to spot. Before Americaentered WorldWar I, WoodrowWilson had attacked"citizens of the United States ... born under other flags... who have poured the poison of disloyaltyinto the very arteriesof our national life."After the war those for- eigners were blamed for the great strikewave of 1919 and the radical agitation surroundingit. AttorneyGeneral A. MitchellPalmer and his youngsubordinate, J. Edgar Hoover, rounded up thousands of Americans born abroad for depor- tation.Palmer describedthe targetsof his raids as "alien filth"with "sly and crafty eyes ... lopsided faces,sloping brows,and misshapen features."3"Communists," agreed Harry Truman's attorneygeneral, J. Howard McGrath,thirty years later, "are everywhere-in factories,offices, butcher shops, on streetcorners, in pri- vatebusiness, and each carriesin himselfthe germsof death forsociety."4 McGrath was echoing Wilsonand Palmer.But invisibleinternal Soviet agents had replaced the alien workingclass as the targetof cold war countersubversion.When Pal- mer's aliens returnedfrom outer space, in the science fictionmovies of the cold war,they looked like everyoneelse. The invisibilityof Communistinfluence distinguished the CommunistParty fromlegitimate opposition groups. But just because Communistsmasqueraded as ordinary citizens,it was necessary to insist they were not. Truman and his liberal anti-Communistsupporters contrasted mundane politicalconflicts to the struggleagainst Communism.The CommunistParty, they argued, was a secret, internationalconspiracy to overthrowAmerican government; the Party took orders froma foreignpower, and its memberscommitted espionage. The transformationof political dissent into criminal disloyaltywas fed by sensational accusations of espionage in the late 1940s and early 1950s against Alger Hiss, Judith Coplon, and Ethel and Julius Rosenberg. Hiss, accused of transmittingconfidential State Departmentdocuments, was convictedof perjury. The Rosenbergs were executed for,in Judge Irving Kaufman'swords, "putting into the hands of the Russians the A-bomb."Judge Kaufman accused the Rosen- bergsof responsibilityfor Communist aggression and Americandeaths in Korea. KissMe Deadly:Communism, Motherhood, and Cold WarMovies 3 This content downloaded from 169.234.53.127 on Wed, 04 Mar 2015
Recommended publications
  • ORIGIN 37 March 2021
    ORIGIN 37 March 2021 Publication of the National Fantasy Fan Federation History and Research Bureau Published by the National Fantasy Fan Federation (N3F). To join or renew, use the membership form at http://n3f.org/join/membership-form/ to provide your name and whichever address you use to receive zines. Memberships with The National Fantasy Fan (TNFF) via paper mail are $18; memberships with TNFF via email are $6. Zines other than TNFF are email only. Additional memberships at the address of a current dues-paying member are $4. Public memberships are free. Send payments to Kevin Trainor, PO Box 143, Tonopah, Nevada 89049. Pay online at N3F.org . Our PayPal contact is [email protected] . Editor of Origin and Bureau Head of the History and Research Bureau is John Thiel. STAFF Judy Carroll, 975 East 120 S, Spanish Fork, Utah 84660, [email protected] Jeffrey Redmond, 1335 Beechwood NE, Grand Rapids, MI 49505-3830, [email protected] Jon Swartz, 12115 Missel Thrush Court, Austin, Texas 78750, [email protected] Origin is published monthly at the midmonth and is circulated to all members with email addresses. Cover by Alan White Contents: Editorial, “Why Feud? What’s the Matter?” by John Thiel, page three. Genre Paperbacks in the Armed Services editions, by Jon Swartz, page five. The Gunn Center for the Study of Science Fiction, by Jeffrey Redmond, page eleven. Getting Along by Judy Carroll, page seventeen. Personal Considerations on SF and Fantasy by Will Mayo, page nineteen. EDITORIAL Why Feud? What’s the Matter?—The Modern Fight Culture There’s a lot of reason to see an upturn in the science fiction culture, but there remains a lot of feuding going on here and there in fandom, now becoming more and more visible on Facebook.
    [Show full text]
  • 31 Days of Oscar® 2010 Schedule
    31 DAYS OF OSCAR® 2010 SCHEDULE Monday, February 1 6:00 AM Only When I Laugh (’81) (Kevin Bacon, James Coco) 8:15 AM Man of La Mancha (’72) (James Coco, Harry Andrews) 10:30 AM 55 Days at Peking (’63) (Harry Andrews, Flora Robson) 1:30 PM Saratoga Trunk (’45) (Flora Robson, Jerry Austin) 4:00 PM The Adventures of Don Juan (’48) (Jerry Austin, Viveca Lindfors) 6:00 PM The Way We Were (’73) (Viveca Lindfors, Barbra Streisand) 8:00 PM Funny Girl (’68) (Barbra Streisand, Omar Sharif) 11:00 PM Lawrence of Arabia (’62) (Omar Sharif, Peter O’Toole) 3:00 AM Becket (’64) (Peter O’Toole, Martita Hunt) 5:30 AM Great Expectations (’46) (Martita Hunt, John Mills) Tuesday, February 2 7:30 AM Tunes of Glory (’60) (John Mills, John Fraser) 9:30 AM The Dam Busters (’55) (John Fraser, Laurence Naismith) 11:30 AM Mogambo (’53) (Laurence Naismith, Clark Gable) 1:30 PM Test Pilot (’38) (Clark Gable, Mary Howard) 3:30 PM Billy the Kid (’41) (Mary Howard, Henry O’Neill) 5:15 PM Mr. Dodd Takes the Air (’37) (Henry O’Neill, Frank McHugh) 6:45 PM One Way Passage (’32) (Frank McHugh, William Powell) 8:00 PM The Thin Man (’34) (William Powell, Myrna Loy) 10:00 PM The Best Years of Our Lives (’46) (Myrna Loy, Fredric March) 1:00 AM Inherit the Wind (’60) (Fredric March, Noah Beery, Jr.) 3:15 AM Sergeant York (’41) (Noah Beery, Jr., Walter Brennan) 5:30 AM These Three (’36) (Walter Brennan, Marcia Mae Jones) Wednesday, February 3 7:15 AM The Champ (’31) (Marcia Mae Jones, Walter Beery) 8:45 AM Viva Villa! (’34) (Walter Beery, Donald Cook) 10:45 AM The Pubic Enemy
    [Show full text]
  • Howard Hughes
    Howard Hughes Howard Hughes September 24, 1905 Born Houston, Texas, USA April 5, 1976 (aged 70) Died Houston, Texas, USA Chairman, Hughes Aircraft; Occupation industrialist; aviator; engineer; film producer Net worth US$12.8 bn (1958 Forbes 400) Ella Rice (1925-1929) Spouse Terry Moore (1949-1976) Jean Peters (1957-1971) For the Welsh murderer, see Howard Hughes (murderer). Howard Robard Hughes, Jr. (September 24, 1905 – April 5, 1976) was, in his time, an aviator, engineer, industrialist, film producer and director, a palgrave, a playboy, an eccentric, and one of the wealthiest people in the world. He is famous for setting multiple, world air-speed records, building the Hughes H-1 Racer and H-4 Hercules airplanes, producing the movies Hell's Angels and The Outlaw, owning and expanding TWA, his enormous intellect[1], and for his debilitating eccentric behavior in later life. Early years Hughes was born in Houston, Texas, on 24 September or 24 December 1905. Hughes claimed his birthday was Christmas Eve, although some biographers debate his exact birth date, (according to NNDB.com, it was most likely "the more mundane date of September 24"[2] ). His parents were Allene Stone Gano Hughes (a descendant of Catherine of Valois, Dowager Queen of England, by second husband Owen Tudor) [3][4] and Howard R. Hughes, Sr., who patented the tri-cone roller bit, which 1 allowed rotary drilling for oil in previously inaccessible places. Howard R. Hughes, Sr. founded Hughes Tool Company in 1909 to commercialize this invention. Hughes grew up under the strong influence of his mother, who was obsessed with protecting her son from all germs and diseases.
    [Show full text]
  • Pocket Edition!
    Matthew Brannon matthew brannon As the literary form of the new bourgeoisie, the biography is a sign of escape, or, to be more precise, of evasion. In order not to expose themselves through insights that question the very existence of the bourgeoisie, writers of biographies remain, as if up against a wall, at the threshold to which they have been pushed by world events. - SIGFRIED KRACAUER, The Biography as an Art Form of the New Bourgeoisie, 1930 in The Mass Ornament: Weimar Essays, Oxford University Press, 2002 Call yourself an actor? You’re not even a bad actor. You can’t act at all, you fucking stupid hopeless sniveling little cunt-faced cunty fucking shit-faced arse-hole… - LAURENCE OLIVIER to Laurence Havery from Robert Stephen’s Knight Errant: Memoirs of a Vagabond Actor, Hodder and Stoughton, 1995 In show business, it’s folly to talk about what the future holds. Things change so fast. Today’s project so easily becomes tomorrow’s disappointment… The world of the film star is an obstacle race against time. The pitfalls and wrong turnings you can make are devastating. Often I fear for the sanity of some of my friends… The dice are loaded against you. There’s so much bitchery around, you really have to fight hard to survive. Everybody is against you… you have to fight for… success, sell your soul for it even. And when one finally achieved success, it was resented. Not by the great stars like Frank Sinatra, but by the little, frustrated people. They’re the ones to look out for, because brother, they’re gunning for you.
    [Show full text]
  • September 6, 2011 (XXIII:2) Anthony Asquith and Leslie Howard, PYGMALION (1938, 96 Min)
    September 6, 2011 (XXIII:2) Anthony Asquith and Leslie Howard, PYGMALION (1938, 96 min) Directed by Anthony Asquith and Leslie Howard Written by George Bernard Shaw (play, scenario & dialogue), W.P. Lipscomb, Cecil Lewis, Ian Dalrymple (uncredited), Anatole de Grunwald (uncredited), Kay Walsh (uncredited) Produced by Gabriel Pascal Original Music by Arthur Honegger Cinematography by Harry Stradling Edited by David Lean Art Direction by John Bryan Costume Design by Ladislaw Czettel (as Professor L. Czettel), Schiaparelli (uncredited), Worth (uncredited) Music composed by William Axt Music conducted by Louis Levy Leslie Howard...Professor Henry Higgins Wendy Hiller...Eliza Doolittle Wilfrid Lawson...Alfred Doolittle Marie Lohr...Mrs. Higgins Scott Sunderland...Colonel George Pickering GEORGE BERNARD SHAW [from Wikipedia](26 July 1856 – 2 Jean Cadell...Mrs. Pearce November 1950) was an Irish playwright and a co-founder of the David Tree...Freddy Eynsford-Hill London School of Economics. Although his first profitable writing Everley Gregg...Mrs. Eynsford-Hill was music and literary criticism, in which capacity he wrote many Leueen MacGrath...Clara Eynsford Hill highly articulate pieces of journalism, his main talent was for Esme Percy...Count Aristid Karpathy drama, and he wrote more than 60 plays. Nearly all his writings address prevailing social problems, but have a vein of comedy Academy Award – 1939 – Best Screenplay which makes their stark themes more palatable. Shaw examined George Bernard Shaw, W.P. Lipscomb, Cecil Lewis, Ian Dalrymple education, marriage, religion, government, health care, and class privilege. ANTHONY ASQUITH (November 9, 1902, London, England, UK – He was most angered by what he perceived as the February 20, 1968, Marylebone, London, England, UK) directed 43 exploitation of the working class.
    [Show full text]
  • January 27, 2009 (XVIII:3) Samuel Fuller PICKUP on SOUTH STREET (1953, 80 Min)
    January 27, 2009 (XVIII:3) Samuel Fuller PICKUP ON SOUTH STREET (1953, 80 min) Directed and written by Samuel Fuller Based on a story by Dwight Taylor Produced by Jules Schermer Original Music by Leigh Harline Cinematography by Joseph MacDonald Richard Widmark...Skip McCoy Jean Peters...Candy Thelma Ritter...Moe Williams Murvyn Vye...Captain Dan Tiger Richard Kiley...Joey Willis Bouchey...Zara Milburn Stone...Detective Winoki Parley Baer...Headquarters Communist in chair SAMUEL FULLER (August 12, 1912, Worcester, Massachusetts— October 30, 1997, Hollywood, California) has 53 writing credits and 32 directing credits. Some of the films and tv episodes he directed were Street of No Return (1989), Les Voleurs de la nuit/Thieves After Dark (1984), White Dog (1982), The Big Red One (1980), "The Iron Horse" (1966-1967), The Naked Kiss True Story of Jesse James (1957), Hilda Crane (1956), The View (1964), Shock Corridor (1963), "The Virginian" (1962), "The from Pompey's Head (1955), Broken Lance (1954), Hell and High Dick Powell Show" (1962), Merrill's Marauders (1962), Water (1954), How to Marry a Millionaire (1953), Pickup on Underworld U.S.A. (1961), The Crimson Kimono (1959), South Street (1953), Titanic (1953), Niagara (1953), What Price Verboten! (1959), Forty Guns (1957), Run of the Arrow (1957), Glory (1952), O. Henry's Full House (1952), Viva Zapata! (1952), China Gate (1957), House of Bamboo (1955), Hell and High Panic in the Streets (1950), Pinky (1949), It Happens Every Water (1954), Pickup on South Street (1953), Park Row (1952), Spring (1949), Down to the Sea in Ships (1949), Yellow Sky Fixed Bayonets! (1951), The Steel Helmet (1951), The Baron of (1948), The Street with No Name (1948), Call Northside 777 Arizona (1950), and I Shot Jesse James (1949).
    [Show full text]
  • The Creative Process
    The Creative Process THE SEARCH FOR AN AUDIO-VISUAL LANGUAGE AND STRUCTURE SECOND EDITION by John Howard Lawson Preface by Jay Leyda dol HILL AND WANG • NEW YORK www.johnhowardlawson.com Copyright © 1964, 1967 by John Howard Lawson All rights reserved Library of Congress catalog card number: 67-26852 Manufactured in the United States of America First edition September 1964 Second edition November 1967 www.johnhowardlawson.com To the Association of Film Makers of the U.S.S.R. and all its members, whose proud traditions and present achievements have been an inspiration in the preparation of this book www.johnhowardlawson.com Preface The masters of cinema moved at a leisurely pace, enjoyed giving generalized instruction, and loved to abandon themselves to reminis­ cence. They made it clear that they possessed certain magical secrets of their profession, but they mentioned them evasively. Now and then they made lofty artistic pronouncements, but they showed a more sincere interest in anecdotes about scenarios that were written on a cuff during a gay supper.... This might well be a description of Hollywood during any period of its cultivated silence on the matter of film-making. Actually, it is Leningrad in 1924, described by Grigori Kozintsev in his memoirs.1 It is so seldom that we are allowed to study the disclosures of a Hollywood film-maker about his medium that I cannot recall the last instance that preceded John Howard Lawson's book. There is no dearth of books about Hollywood, but when did any other book come from there that takes such articulate pride in the art that is-or was-made there? I have never understood exactly why the makers of American films felt it necessary to hide their methods and aims under blankets of coyness and anecdotes, the one as impenetrable as the other.
    [Show full text]
  • It's a Conspiracy
    IT’S A CONSPIRACY! As a Cautionary Remembrance of the JFK Assassination—A Survey of Films With A Paranoid Edge Dan Akira Nishimura with Don Malcolm The only culture to enlist the imagination and change the charac- der. As it snows, he walks the streets of the town that will be forever ter of Americans was the one we had been given by the movies… changed. The banker Mr. Potter (Lionel Barrymore), a scrooge-like No movie star had the mind, courage or force to be national character, practically owns Bedford Falls. As he prepares to reshape leader… So the President nominated himself. He would fill the it in his own image, Potter doesn’t act alone. There’s also a board void. He would be the movie star come to life as President. of directors with identities shielded from the public (think MPAA). Who are these people? And what’s so wonderful about them? —Norman Mailer 3. Ace in the Hole (1951) resident John F. Kennedy was a movie fan. Ironically, one A former big city reporter of his favorites was The Manchurian Candidate (1962), lands a job for an Albu- directed by John Frankenheimer. With the president’s per- querque daily. Chuck Tatum mission, Frankenheimer was able to shoot scenes from (Kirk Douglas) is looking for Seven Days in May (1964) at the White House. Due to a ticket back to “the Apple.” Pthe events of November 1963, both films seem prescient. He thinks he’s found it when Was Lee Harvey Oswald a sleeper agent, a “Manchurian candidate?” Leo Mimosa (Richard Bene- Or was it a military coup as in the latter film? Or both? dict) is trapped in a cave Over the years, many films have dealt with political conspira- collapse.
    [Show full text]
  • Marilyn Monroe and Niagara
    Icons are all around us, and often we don’t even question it. So ingrained is their power their image becomes synonymous with what they represent. The Statue of Liberty, a gift from the French, has come to represent a cultural welcome, freedom from oppression. After thousands of immigrants arrivals and generations of hardship, the sighting of the Statue in New York harbor has become iconic. Fifteen minutes of fame does not an icon make. An icon requires survival of a multistep process, which pushes the image to its limits. Firstly, an icon needs to have common roots, at least one foot among the masses. This is what allows the spectator to take ownership and feel connected and makes them a viable icon. An icon cannot be a representative of a group if it is not one of what it stands for. Secondly, the icon while remaining at its base “common”, must have an exceptional, unique qualtiy whic makes it the best example of something. It is the fastest, the highest, or the furthest. After it gains popularity because of these two first qualities, it then must stand a rigorous litany of deconstruction, digestion, and interrogation, before it can reach the fourth phase of being praised, lauded and embraced as the quintessential one of its kind. The irony is that once it claims icon status, all that made it so interesting to begin with has been stripped away. It has been so contorted, manipulated as to be simplified for the masses that only that one outstanding unique quality remains, and everything else is ignored.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalogue 147: Science Fiction
    And God said: DELETE lines One to Aleph. LOAD. RUN. And the Universe ceased to exist. Then he pondered for a few aeons, sighed, and added: ERASE. It never had existed. For David Catalogue 147: Science Fiction Bromer Booksellers 607 Boylston Street, at Copley Square Boston, MA 02116 P: 617-247-2818 F: 617-247-2975 E: [email protected] Visit our website at www.bromer.com n the Introduction to Catalogue 123, which contained the bulk of a In his fifty years as a bookman, David naturally recognized the signifi- science fiction collection he had assembled, David Bromer noted cance of the early rarities, the books that laid the groundwork for the that “science fiction is a robust genre of literature, not allowing authors of the modern era. He was pleased to discover, when cata- one to ever complete a collection.” The progressive nature of sci- loguing Cyrano de Bergerac’s The Comical History of the States and enceI and the social fabric that it impacts means that the genre itself Empires of the Worlds of the Moon and the Sun, that its author de- has to be fluid, never quite getting pinned down like a specimen under scribed a personal music player–anticipating in the year 1687 the cre- glass. ation of the Walkman and iPod three centuries later. In this regard, it is entirely fitting that David has been drawn to science Ultimately, science fiction primed the human imagination to accom- fiction as a reader, and as a collector. He is a scientist by training, hav- plish what is perhaps its greatest achievement: the exploration of ing earned a PhD in Metallurgy from MIT and worked in research fields space and the mission to the moon in 1969.
    [Show full text]
  • RESISTANCE MADE in HOLLYWOOD: American Movies on Nazi Germany, 1939-1945
    1 RESISTANCE MADE IN HOLLYWOOD: American Movies on Nazi Germany, 1939-1945 Mercer Brady Senior Honors Thesis in History University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Department of History Advisor: Prof. Karen Hagemann Co-Reader: Prof. Fitz Brundage Date: March 16, 2020 2 Acknowledgements I want to thank Dr. Karen Hagemann. I had not worked with Dr. Hagemann before this process; she took a chance on me by becoming my advisor. I thought that I would be unable to pursue an honors thesis. By being my advisor, she made this experience possible. Her interest and dedication to my work exceeded my expectations. My thesis greatly benefited from her input. Thank you, Dr. Hagemann, for your generosity with your time and genuine interest in this thesis and its success. Thank you to Dr. Fitz Brundage for his helpful comments and willingness to be my second reader. I would also like to thank Dr. Michelle King for her valuable suggestions and support throughout this process. I am very grateful for Dr. Hagemann and Dr. King. Thank you both for keeping me motivated and believing in my work. Thank you to my roommates, Julia Wunder, Waverly Leonard, and Jamie Antinori, for being so supportive. They understood when I could not be social and continued to be there for me. They saw more of the actual writing of this thesis than anyone else. Thank you for being great listeners and wonderful friends. Thank you also to my parents, Joe and Krista Brady, for their unwavering encouragement and trust in my judgment. I would also like to thank my sister, Mahlon Brady, for being willing to hear about subjects that are out of her sphere of interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Lawyers and the Law in Three Novels
    The Catholic Lawyer Volume 37 Number 1 Volume 37, Number 1 Article 4 Children Into Men: Lawyers and the Law in Three Novels Gregory J. Sullivan Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.stjohns.edu/tcl Part of the Law and Society Commons This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at St. John's Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Catholic Lawyer by an authorized editor of St. John's Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CHILDREN INTO MEN: LAWYERS AND THE LAW IN THREE NOVELS GREGORY J. SULLIVAN* It is a contradiction in terms to attempt a sinless Literatureof sinful man.' The interdisciplinary law-and-literature movement has bur- geoned in recent years. Numerous books and articles have ap- peared within the past decade or so and many law schools now regularly offer courses on the subject. This essay, however, will not address the movement itself; indeed, I believe it is replete with sundry limitations.2 Nevertheless, one facet of the growing area of law-and-literature-and the connections between the two fields-that is salutary is the renewed interest in, and explica- tion of, works of literature that have legal themes or involve characters who are lawyers. This area is one in which lawyers can provide insights into the novels that a reader untrained in the law would perhaps overlook or misunderstand. Associate, Hartsough & Kenny, New Jersey. B.A., cum laude, Trenton State College, 1985; M.A., Villanova University, 1987; J.D., Seton Hall University School of Law, 1992.
    [Show full text]