DOCSLIB.ORG

Indicative Map of the Pan-European Ecological Network for Central and Eastern Europe

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Indicative Map of the Pan-European Ecological Network for Central and Eastern Europe INDICATIVE MAP OF THE PAN-EUROPEAN ECOLOGICAL NETWORK FOR CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE TECHNICAL BACKGROUND DOCUMENT Editors: I.M.Bouwma, R.H.G. Jongman & R.O. Butovsky Prepared under the co-ordination of ECNC in co-operation with Alterra Published by: ECNC, Tilburg, the Netherlands Prepared by: European Centre for Nature Conservation, Tilburg, The Netherlands Copyright: © 2002 European Centre for Nature Conservation No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, for resale or other commercial purposes without the prior written permission of ECNC. Citation: I.M.Bouwma, R.H.G. Jongman & R.O. Butovsky (eds) (2002). The Indicative Map of Pan-European Ecological Network - technical background document. (ECNC Technical report series). ECNC, Tilburg, The Netherlands/Budapest Hungary. 101 pp + annexes ISBN: 90-76762-13-9 Printed by: Tilburg University Drukkerij, Tilburg, The Netherlands Cover design: Project V, Tilburg, The Netherlands Cover photo: River Pechora (Russia), B. Pedroli Cartography: Ms. C. de Kramer, Th. Jacobs & J. Onderstal Available from: European Centre for Nature Conservation (ECNC) Headquarters – Tilburg PO Box 1352 5004 BJ Tilburg The Netherlands Tel: +31 13 466 32 40 / Fax: +31 13 466 32 50 Email: [email protected] http://www.ecnc.nl Disclaimer: The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the funders or reviewers. Geographical names and administrative borders are based on information provided by Environmental Systems Research Institute inc. (ESRI). The designations of geographical entities in this report and on the indicative map, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of ECNC concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. 2 Editors I.M. Bouwma, R.H.G. Jongman & R.O. Butovsky Project co-ordinators I.M. Bouwma (ECNC) & J.A. Klijn (Alterra) Members of the project team (in alphabetical order) I.M. Bouwma (European Centre for Nature Conservation) R. Butovsky (All-Russian Research Institute for Nature Protection) A. Dyduch-Falniowska (Institute of Nature Conservation-Polish Academy of Science) R.P.B. Foppen (Alterra) R.H.G. Jongman (Wageningen University) J.A. Klijn (Alterra) I. Lysenko (UNEP-World Conservation Monitoring Centre) Ü. Mander (University of Tartu) S. Mücher (Alterra) A. Pickaver (EUCC - The Coastal Union) R. Reijnen (Alterra) K. Remm (University of Tartu) S. Tworek (Institute of Nature Conservation - Polish Academy of Science) M. Vegh (European Centre for Nature Conservation). Observer for the Dutch Ministry of Agriculture, Nature Management and Fisheries A.J.F.M. van Opstal (National Reference Centre for Agriculture, Nature Management and Fisheries). Funders The project was financially supported by the Dutch Ministry of Agriculture, Nature Management and Fisheries and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MATRA Fund – Programme International Nature Management); the Dutch DWK-fund; the Swiss Agency for Environment, Forests and Landscape, Ministry of the Walloon region of Belgium, the Council of Europe and the European Centre for Nature Conservation. The project was undertaken under the auspices of the Committee of Experts for the development of the Pan-European Ecological Network. 3 Table of Contents Preface.................................................................................................................................. 8 Acknowledgements............................................................................................................. 9 Executive Summary .......................................................................................................... 10 Résumé exécutif ................................................................................................................ 12 Резюме............................................................................................................................... 14 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................. 17 2. Theoretical background and experiences with designing ecological networks 21 2.1 Theoretical background........................................................................................................... 21 2.1.1 Migration and dispersal............................................................................................................ 22 2.1.2 Connectivity ............................................................................................................................. 23 2.2 The Pan-European Ecological Network................................................................................... 24 2.2.1 Definition.................................................................................................................................. 24 2.2.2 Core areas of Pan-European importance ................................................................................ 25 2.2.3 Ecological Corridors................................................................................................................. 27 2.2.4 Buffer zones............................................................................................................................ 28 2.2.5 Nature restoration areas.......................................................................................................... 29 2.3 Data used in the project........................................................................................................... 30 2.3.1 Data availability....................................................................................................................... 30 2.3.2 Marine and Coastal Areas ....................................................................................................... 31 3. Methodology to prepare the Indicative Map of the Pan-European Ecological Network ..................................................................................................................... 35 3.1 Phases in the design process.................................................................................................. 35 3.2 Concept development, definitions, specification of reasoning ................................................. 36 3.3 Analysis of data, development of guidelines for the map design............................................. 39 3.4 Validation and consultation phase ........................................................................................... 41 4. Data collection and processing .............................................................................. 43 4.1 The Pan-European Ecological Network habitat map ............................................................... 43 4.1.1 Compilation of land cover map ................................................................................................ 43 4.1.2 Identification of priority habitat types ....................................................................................... 49 4.2 Identification of core areas based on species distribution data ............................................... 53 4.2.1 Introduction.............................................................................................................................. 53 4.2.2 Selection of priority species..................................................................................................... 53 4 4.2.3 Identification of important areas based on distribution data of species ....................................55 4.3 Identification of core areas based on estimated area demands of species..............................58 4.4 Identification of core areas based on internationally designated sites .....................................61 4.4.1 Site status: assumptions for site selection. ..............................................................................61 4.4.2 Data compilation and assumptions for sites selection for application in the indicative map development: site area, size, and location versus map scale/resolution..................................63 4.5 (Pan) European Corridors........................................................................................................64 4.5.1 Introduction ..............................................................................................................................64 4.5.2 Bird migration corridors ............................................................................................................64 4.5.3 Terrestrial dispersal corridors...................................................................................................65 4.5.4 River corridors..........................................................................................................................66 5. The indicative map and its use................................................................................69 5.1 General ....................................................................................................................................69 5.2 What is meant by ‘indicative’? ..................................................................................................70 5.3 What does the indicative map show and what not? .................................................................71
Load more

Recommended publications
  • IN BOSNIA and HERZEGOVINA June 2008
    RESULTS FROM THE EU BIODIVERSITY STANDARDS SCIENTIFIC COORDINATION GROUP (HD WG) IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA June 2008 RESULTS FROM THE EU BIODIVERSITY STANDARDS SCIENTIFIC COORDINATION GROUP (HD WG) IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 30th June 2008 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 4 2 BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON BIH.................................................................. 5 3 IDENTIFIED SOURCES OF INFORMATION ............................................................. 8 3-a Relevant institutions.......................................................................................................................................8 3-b Experts.............................................................................................................................................................9 3-c Relevant scientific publications ...................................................................................................................10 3-c-i) Birds...........................................................................................................................................................10 3-c-ii) Fish ........................................................................................................................................................12 3-c-iii) Mammals ...............................................................................................................................................12 3-c-iv)
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Covenants
    Law Commission Consultation Paper No 211 CONSERVATION COVENANTS A Consultation Paper ii THE LAW COMMISSION – HOW WE CONSULT About the Law Commission: The Law Commission was set up by section 1 of the Law Commissions Act 1965 for the purpose of promoting the reform of the law. The Law Commissioners are: The Rt Hon Lord Justice Lloyd Jones, Chairman, Professor Elizabeth Cooke, David Hertzell, Professor David Ormerod QC and Frances Patterson QC. The Chief Executive is Elaine Lorimer. Topic of this consultation: This Consultation Paper examines the case for introducing “conservation covenants” into the law of England and Wales, and considers how a scheme of conservation covenants might be framed. A conservation covenant is a private agreement made by a landowner, for the purposes of conservation. We discuss the current law and set out a number of provisional proposals and options for reform on which we invite consultees’ views. Geographical scope: The Consultation Paper applies to the law of England and Wales. Impact assessment: In Chapter 9 of this Consultation Paper, consultees are asked also to comment on the likely costs and benefits of any changes provisionally proposed. Consultees’ responses will inform our final recommendations and a formal impact assessment document that will be published with our Report. Availability of materials: This Consultation is available on our website at: http://lawcommission.justice.gov.uk/consultations/conservation-covenants.htm. Duration of the consultation: We invite responses from 28 March 2013 to 21 June 2013. Comments may be sent: By email to: [email protected] or By post to: Luke Campbell, Law Commission, Steel House, 11 Tothill Street, London SW1H 9LJ Tel: 020 3334 0200 / Fax: 020 3334 0201 If you send your comments by post, it would be helpful if, whenever possible, you could send them to us electronically as well (for example, on CD or by email to the above address, in any commonly used format).
    [Show full text]
  • Land Use Element of the General Plan
    General Plan Land Use Element Adopted December 15, 1993 Amended November 9, 2011 Amended July 22, 2015 Amended July 26, 2016 Amended April 26, 2017 Amended September 26, 2017 Amended December 13, 2017 Amended December 17, 2019 Amended October 6, 2020 County of Sacramento Office of Planning and Environmental Review . This page is blank County of Sacramento General Plan Land Use Element Amended October 6, 2020 Table of Contents SECTION I ..................................................................................................................................... 1 ELEMENT INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 1 Required Contents of the Land Use Element .............................................................................. 1 Concepts of the Land Use Element ............................................................................................. 1 Relationship to Other Elements .................................................................................................. 2 Relationship to Other County Planning Tools ............................................................................ 3 Relationship to Regional Planning Efforts ................................................................................. 6 THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DIAGRAM ......................................................................... 7 How to Use the Land Use Diagram ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • An Investment Primer for Reforestation CARBON REMOVAL, ENVIRONMENTAL and SOCIAL IMPACTS, and FINANCIAL POTENTIAL
    1 An Investment Primer for Reforestation CARBON REMOVAL, ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACTS, AND FINANCIAL POTENTIAL JANUARY 2020 1 CONTENTS Contents About CREO 2 Terms 3 Executive Summary 4 Background Forestry for Climate 6 Reforestation Investment Potential 9 - Investment Avenues 9 - Costs and Returns 10 Carbon Markets Regulatory Compliance 14 Voluntary 15 Corporate Offsetting 15 Summary 16 Timber and Non-Timber Forest Products Timber 18 Agroforestry 19 Summary 20 Restoration and Conservation Initiatives Direct Revenue Creation 22 Blended Finance 23 Catalytic Capital 24 Summary 24 Moving Forward 25 Appendix A: CREO Modelling Assumptions 26 Appendix B: Carbon Markets 27 Citations 28 2 ABOUT CREO About CREO The CREO Syndicate (“CREO”) is a 501c3 public charity founded by wealth owners and family offices with a mission to address the most pressing environmental challenges of our time affecting communities across the globe—climate change and resource scarcity. By catalyzing private capital and scaling innovative solutions, CREO is contributing to protecting and preserving the environment and accelerating the transition to a sustainable economy for the benefit of the public. CREO works closely with a broad set of global stakeholders, including Members (wealth owners, family offices, and family-owned enterprises), Friends (aligned investors such as pension funds), and Partners (government, not-for-profit organizations and academia), who collaboratively develop and invest in solutions across sectors, asset classes and geographies. CREO’s primary activities include 1) knowledge building; 2) relationship building among like-minded, values-aligned, long-term investors; 3) conducting select research to support the advancement of its mission; and 4) deal origination. 3 TERMS Terms Afforestation (AF): Planting and/or deliberate seeding on land not forested over the last 50 years.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impacts of Urbanisation on the Ecology and Evolution of Dragonflies and Damselflies (Insecta: Odonata)
    The impacts of urbanisation on the ecology and evolution of dragonflies and damselflies (Insecta: Odonata) Giovanna de Jesús Villalobos Jiménez Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) The University of Leeds School of Biology September 2017 The candidate confirms that the work submitted is her own, except where work which has formed part of jointly-authored publications has been included. The contribution of the candidate and the other authors to this work has been explicitly indicated below. The candidate confirms that appropriate credit has been given within the thesis where reference has been made to the work of others. The work in Chapter 1 of the thesis has appeared in publication as follows: Villalobos-Jiménez, G., Dunn, A.M. & Hassall, C., 2016. Dragonflies and damselflies (Odonata) in urban ecosystems: a review. Eur J Entomol, 113(1): 217–232. I was responsible for the collection and analysis of the data with advice from co- authors, and was solely responsible for the literature review, interpretation of the results, and for writing the manuscript. All co-authors provided comments on draft manuscripts. The work in Chapter 2 of the thesis has appeared in publication as follows: Villalobos-Jiménez, G. & Hassall, C., 2017. Effects of the urban heat island on the phenology of Odonata in London, UK. International Journal of Biometeorology, 61(7): 1337–1346. I was responsible for the data analysis, interpretation of results, and for writing and structuring the manuscript. Data was provided by the British Dragonfly Society (BDS). The co-author provided advice on the data analysis, and also provided comments on draft manuscripts.
    [Show full text]
  • Swaegers Etal 2014
    doi: 10.1111/jeb.12481 Ecological and evolutionary drivers of range size in Coenagrion damselflies J. SWAEGERS*, S. B. JANSSENS†,S.FERREIRA‡§¶,P.C.WATTS¶**, J. MERGEAY††, M. A. MC PEEK‡‡ &R.STOKS* *Laboratory of Aquatic Ecology, Evolution and Conservation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium †Botanic Garden Meise, Meise, Belgium ‡CIBIO/InBIO – Centro de Investigacßao~ em Biodiversidade e Recursos Geneticos da Universidade do Porto, Vairao,~ Portugal §Departamento de Biologia da Faculdade de Ci^encias da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal ¶Institute of Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK **Department of Biology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland ††Research Institute for Nature and Forest, Geraardsbergen, Belgium ‡‡Department of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA Keywords: Abstract Bergmann’s rule; Geographic range size is a key ecological and evolutionary characteristic of a dispersal capacity; species, yet the causal basis of variation in range size among species remains latitudinal patterns; largely unresolved. One major reason for this is that several ecological and phylogeny; evolutionary traits may jointly shape species’ differences in range size. We range size; here present an integrated study of the contribution of ecological (dispersal Rapoport’s rule. capacity, body size and latitudinal position) and macroevolutionary (species’ age) traits in shaping variation in species’ range size in Coenagrion damsel- flies. We reconstructed the phylogenetic tree of this genus to account for evolutionary history when assessing the contribution of the ecological traits and to evaluate the role of the macroevolutionary trait (species’ age). The genus invaded the Nearctic twice independently from the Palearctic, yet this was not associated with the evolution of larger range sizes or dispersal capacity.
    [Show full text]
  • Pollination Ecology, Breeding System, and Conservation of Caldesia Grandis (Alismataceae), an Endangered Marsh Plant in China
    GituruBot. Bull. et al.Acad. ReproductiveSin. (2002) 43: biology 231-240 of Caldesia grandis 231 Pollination ecology, breeding system, and conservation of Caldesia grandis (Alismataceae), an endangered marsh plant in China Wahiti Robert Gituru, Qing-.eng Wang*, Yong Wang, and You-Hao Guo College of Life Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, P.R. China (Received November 12, 2001; Accepted March 27, 2002) Abstract. Caldesia grandis Samuelsson is an endangered wetland herb on the brink of extinction in the vast area of Mainland China, which holds close to one eighth of the worlds vascular plant species. The pollination ecology and breeding system of C. grandis were investigated from three natural populations occurring in two wetlands near the top of Mangshan Mountain in Hunan Province, central China. The species is in flower from early July to late Sep- tember with a peak in August. The process of flower anthesis in C. grandis begins at about 10.00 am and lasts about four-and-one-quarter h. The flowers lasted ca. 5.5 h. Caldesia grandis is self-compatible; however, autogamy re- sulted in lower seed set than geitonogamy and xenogamy as well as free pollination. Both pollen viability and the seed set in open-pollinated controls at the same site were typically high (65.44% and 71.78% respectively). Mean pollen: ovule ratios in the three populations ranged from 901.75 to 931.354. No seed germination was observed, either in the field or in laboratory experiments. Propagation is achieved through turions, which commonly occur in the inflorescences. .lies (Insecta; Diptera) were the most frequent visitors to the flowers of C.
    [Show full text]
  • Schutz Des Naturhaushaltes Vor Den Auswirkungen Der Anwendung Von Pflanzenschutzmitteln Aus Der Luft in Wäldern Und Im Weinbau
    TEXTE 21/2017 Umweltforschungsplan des Bundesministeriums für Umwelt, Naturschutz, Bau und Reaktorsicherheit Forschungskennzahl 3714 67 406 0 UBA-FB 002461 Schutz des Naturhaushaltes vor den Auswirkungen der Anwendung von Pflanzenschutzmitteln aus der Luft in Wäldern und im Weinbau von Dr. Ingo Brunk, Thomas Sobczyk, Dr. Jörg Lorenz Technische Universität Dresden, Fakultät für Umweltwissenschaften, Institut für Forstbotanik und Forstzoologie, Tharandt Im Auftrag des Umweltbundesamtes Impressum Herausgeber: Umweltbundesamt Wörlitzer Platz 1 06844 Dessau-Roßlau Tel: +49 340-2103-0 Fax: +49 340-2103-2285 [email protected] Internet: www.umweltbundesamt.de /umweltbundesamt.de /umweltbundesamt Durchführung der Studie: Technische Universität Dresden, Fakultät für Umweltwissenschaften, Institut für Forstbotanik und Forstzoologie, Professur für Forstzoologie, Prof. Dr. Mechthild Roth Pienner Straße 7 (Cotta-Bau), 01737 Tharandt Abschlussdatum: Januar 2017 Redaktion: Fachgebiet IV 1.3 Pflanzenschutz Dr. Mareike Güth, Dr. Daniela Felsmann Publikationen als pdf: http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/publikationen ISSN 1862-4359 Dessau-Roßlau, März 2017 Das diesem Bericht zu Grunde liegende Vorhaben wurde mit Mitteln des Bundesministeriums für Umwelt, Naturschutz, Bau und Reaktorsicherheit unter der Forschungskennzahl 3714 67 406 0 gefördert. Die Verantwortung für den Inhalt dieser Veröffentlichung liegt bei den Autorinnen und Autoren. UBA Texte Entwicklung geeigneter Risikominimierungsansätze für die Luftausbringung von PSM Kurzbeschreibung Die Bekämpfung
    [Show full text]
  • RSPB CENTRE for CONSERVATION SCIENCE RSPB CENTRE for CONSERVATION SCIENCE Where Science Comes to Life
    RSPB CENTRE FOR CONSERVATION SCIENCE RSPB CENTRE FOR CONSERVATION SCIENCE Where science comes to life Contents Knowing 2 Introducing the RSPB Centre for Conservation Science and an explanation of how and why the RSPB does science. A decade of science at the RSPB 9 A selection of ten case studies of great science from the RSPB over the last decade: 01 Species monitoring and the State of Nature 02 Farmland biodiversity and wildlife-friendly farming schemes 03 Conservation science in the uplands 04 Pinewood ecology and management 05 Predation and lowland breeding wading birds 06 Persecution of raptors 07 Seabird tracking 08 Saving the critically endangered sociable lapwing 09 Saving South Asia's vultures from extinction 10 RSPB science supports global site-based conservation Spotlight on our experts 51 Meet some of the team and find out what it is like to be a conservation scientist at the RSPB. Funding and partnerships 63 List of funders, partners and PhD students whom we have worked with over the last decade. Chris Gomersall (rspb-images.com) Conservation rooted in know ledge Introduction from Dr David W. Gibbons Welcome to the RSPB Centre for Conservation The Centre does not have a single, physical Head of RSPB Centre for Conservation Science Science. This new initiative, launched in location. Our scientists will continue to work from February 2014, will showcase, promote and a range of RSPB’s addresses, be that at our UK build the RSPB’s scientific programme, helping HQ in Sandy, at RSPB Scotland’s HQ in Edinburgh, us to discover solutions to 21st century or at a range of other addresses in the UK and conservation problems.
    [Show full text]
  • The Radiation of Satyrini Butterflies (Nymphalidae: Satyrinae): A
    Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2011, 161, 64–87. With 8 figures The radiation of Satyrini butterflies (Nymphalidae: Satyrinae): a challenge for phylogenetic methods CARLOS PEÑA1,2*, SÖREN NYLIN1 and NIKLAS WAHLBERG1,3 1Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden 2Museo de Historia Natural, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Av. Arenales 1256, Apartado 14-0434, Lima-14, Peru 3Laboratory of Genetics, Department of Biology, University of Turku, 20014 Turku, Finland Received 24 February 2009; accepted for publication 1 September 2009 We have inferred the most comprehensive phylogenetic hypothesis to date of butterflies in the tribe Satyrini. In order to obtain a hypothesis of relationships, we used maximum parsimony and model-based methods with 4435 bp of DNA sequences from mitochondrial and nuclear genes for 179 taxa (130 genera and eight out-groups). We estimated dates of origin and diversification for major clades, and performed a biogeographic analysis using a dispersal–vicariance framework, in order to infer a scenario of the biogeographical history of the group. We found long-branch taxa that affected the accuracy of all three methods. Moreover, different methods produced incongruent phylogenies. We found that Satyrini appeared around 42 Mya in either the Neotropical or the Eastern Palaearctic, Oriental, and/or Indo-Australian regions, and underwent a quick radiation between 32 and 24 Mya, during which time most of its component subtribes originated. Several factors might have been important for the diversification of Satyrini: the ability to feed on grasses; early habitat shift into open, non-forest habitats; and geographic bridges, which permitted dispersal over marine barriers, enabling the geographic expansions of ancestors to new environ- ments that provided opportunities for geographic differentiation, and diversification.
    [Show full text]
  • Corel Ventura
    Ruthenica, 2005, 15(2): 119-124. ©Ruthenica, 2005 New data on the species of the genus Cochlicopa (Gastropoda, Pulmonata) Alexey L. MAMATKULOV A. N. Severtzov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninskyi Prospect 33, Moscow 119071, RUSSIA ABSTRACT. Structural peculiarities of male repro- evidence was presented that self-fertilization is the ductive tract of Cochlicopa lubrica (Müller, 1704) main but not a single breeding mode of Cochlicopa enable to assume that reproduction takes place all over [Ambruster, Schlegel, 1994]. It was unknown whet- the warm period. The male genitalia condition referred her these species possess spermatophores. to as lubrica-type is a spermatogenesis (male) phase. The purpose of the present study was to find out Spermatophore of Cochlicopa lubrica is described. what are lubrica-type male genitalia; whether a sper- Anatomical investigation confirms that C. repentina is matophore exists and what is the duration of repro- a synonym of C. lubrica. duction period. The investigation was carried out in Tula region, Central Russia. During the investigation about 320 specimens of the two Cochlicopa species Introduction have been dissected. According to the last guide to Pupillina molluscs Material [Schileyko, 1984], three Cochlicopa species occur in Eastern Europe: Cochlicopa lubrica (Müller, Cochlicopa lubrica (Müller, 1774) 1774), C. lubricella (Porro, 1838) and C. nitens 292 specimens of Cochlicopa lubrica from 26 localities (Gallenstein, 1852). The species can be easily dis- were examined. They were collected as follows: 12 spe- tinguished by shell size. Genital organs of the genus, cimens from Belousov Park, Tula, on April 12, 2001; as in most Pupillina, are characterized by the pre- 11 specimens from Michurino Settlement: 3 on April 15, sence of a peculiar appendix in the male tract.
    [Show full text]
  • Three New Species of Alburnoides (Teleostei: Cyprinidae) from Euphrates River, Eastern Anatolia, Turkey
    Zootaxa 3754 (2): 101–116 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2014 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3754.2.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:33DCB673-BC7C-4DB2-84CE-5AC5C6AD2052 Three new species of Alburnoides (Teleostei: Cyprinidae) from Euphrates River, Eastern Anatolia, Turkey DAVUT TURAN1,3, CÜNEYT KAYA1, F. GÜLER EKMEKÇİ2 & ESRA DOĞAN1 1Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University, Faculty of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 53100 Rize, Turkey. E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] 2Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Hacettepe University, Beytepe Campus, 06800 Ankara, Turkey. E-mail: [email protected] 3Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Three new species of Alburnoides, Alburnoides emineae sp. n., Alburnoides velioglui sp. n., Alburnoides recepi sp. n., are described from the Euphrates River drainages (Persian Gulf basin) in eastern Anatolia, Turkey. Alburnoides emineae, from Beyazsu Stream (south-eastern Euphrates River drainage), is distinguished from all species of Alburnoides in Turkey and adjacent regions by a combination of the following characters (none unique to the species): a well developed ventral keel between pelvic and anal fins, commonly scaleless or very rarely 1–2 scales covering the anterior portion of the keel; a deep body (depth at dorsal-fin origin 31–36% SL); 37–43 + 1–2 lateral-line scales, 13½–15½ branched anal-fin rays; number of total vertebrae 41–42, modally 41, comprising 20–21 abdominal and 20–21 caudal vertebrae. Alburnoides velioglui, from Sırlı, Karasu, Divriği and Sultansuyu streams (northern and northeastern Euphrates River drainages), is distinguished by a poorly developed ventral keel, completely scaled; a moderately deep body (depth at dorsal-fin origin 24–29% SL); 45–53 + 1–2 lateral-line scales, 11½ –13½ branched anal-fin rays; number of total vertebrae 41–42, modally 42, comprising 20–22 abdominal and 20–21 caudal vertebrae.
    [Show full text]