Annual Report the Voice of European Railways 2017 CER Annual Report 2017
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Fourth Report to the Council and the European Parliament on Monitoring Development in the Rail Market
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 13.6.2014 COM(2014) 353 final PART 1/2 REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT Fourth report on monitoring development of the rail market {SWD(2014) 186 final} EN EN REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT Fourth report on monitoring development of the rail market TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Evolution of internal market in rail services................................................................ 4 1.1. The objectives of the White Paper on Transport (2011).............................................. 4 1.2. The passenger rail market today .................................................................................. 5 1.3. Evolution of the passenger rail market......................................................................... 8 1.4. The rail freight market today........................................................................................ 9 1.5. Evolution of the rail freight market.............................................................................. 9 2. Evolution of the internal market in services to be supplied to railway undertakings 11 2.1. Stations....................................................................................................................... 11 2.1.1. Stations across the European Union........................................................................... 11 2.1.2. Ownership and management...................................................................................... 12 2.1.3. Access -
Georgia Transport Sector Assessment, Strategy, and Road Map
Georgia Transport Sector Assessment, Strategy, and Road Map The Asian Development Bank (ADB) is preparing sector assessments and road maps to help align future ADB support with the needs and strategies of developing member countries and other development partners. The transport sector assessment of Georgia is a working document that helps inform the development of country partnership strategy. It highlights the development issues, needs and strategic assistance priorities of the transport sector in Georgia. The knowledge product serves as a basis for further dialogue on how ADB and the government can work together to tackle the challenges of managing transport sector development in Georgia in the coming years. About the Asian Development Bank ADB’s vision is an Asia and Pacific region free of poverty. Its mission is to help its developing member countries reduce poverty and improve the quality of life of their people. Despite the region’s many successes, it remains home to two-thirds of the world’s poor: 1.7 billion people who live on less than $2 a day, with 828 million struggling on less than $1.25 a day. Georgia Transport Sector ADB is committed to reducing poverty through inclusive economic growth, environmentally sustainable growth, and regional integration. Based in Manila, ADB is owned by 67 members, including 48 from the region. Its main Assessment, Strategy, instruments for helping its developing member countries are policy dialogue, loans, equity investments, guarantees, grants, and technical assistance. and Road Map TRANSPORT AND COMMUNICATIONS. Georgia. 2014 Asian Development Bank 6 ADB Avenue, Mandaluyong City 1550 Metro Manila, Philippines www.adb.org Printed in the Philippines Georgia Transport Sector Assessment, Strategy, and Road Map © 2014 Asian Development Bank All rights reserved. -
Bibliography
Cover Page The handle http://hdl.handle.net/1887/41440 holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation Author: Said-Zammit, G.A. Title: The development of domestic space in the Maltese Islands from the Late Middle Ages to the second half of the Twentieth Century Issue Date: 2016-06-30 BIBLIOGRAPHY Aalen F.H.A. 1984, ‘Vernacular Buildings in Cephalonia, Ionian Islands’, Journal of Cultural Geography 4/2, 56-72. Abela G.F. 1647, Della descrittione di Malta. Malta, Paolo Bonacota. Abela J. 1997, Marsaxlokk a hundred Years Ago: On the Occasion of the Erection of Marsaxlokk as an Independent Parish. Malta, Kumitat Festi Ċentinarji. Abela J. 1999, Marsaskala, Wied il-Għajn. Malta, Marsascala Local Council. Abela J. 2006, The Parish of Żejtun Through the Ages. Malta, Wirt iż-Żejtun. Abhijit P. 2011, ‘Axial Analysis: A Syntactic Approach to Movement Network Modeling’, Institute of Town Planners India Journal 8/1, 29-40. Abler R., Adams J. and Gould P. 1971, Spatial Organization. New Jersey, Prentice- Hall. Abrams P. and Wrigley E.A. (eds.) 1978, Towns in Societies: Essays in Economic History and Historical Sociology. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Abulafia D. 1981, ‘Southern Italy and the Florentine Economy, 1265-1370’, The Economic History Review 34/3, 377-88. Abulafia D. 1983, ‘The Crown and the Economy under Roger II and His Successors’, Dumbarton Oaks Papers 37, 1-14. Abulafia D. 1986, ‘The Merchants of Messina: Levant Trade and Domestic Economy’, Papers of the British School at Rome 54, 196-212. Abulafia D. 2007, ‘The Last Muslims in Italy’, Annual Report of the Dante Society 125, 271-87. -
REVENUE Revenue Use from Transport Pricing Deliverable 3
REVENUE Revenue Use from Transport Pricing Contract: GMA2-2001-52011 Funded by European Commission – DG TREN Fifth Framework Programme Competitive and Sustainable Growth Programme Key Action 2 – Sustainable Mobility and Intermodality Deliverable 3 Case Studies Specification Version 2.0 Date: 9th March 2005 Authors: S. Suter and U. Springer (ECOPLAN), A. de Palma and R. Lindsey (adpC), S. van der Loo (KULeuven), A. Ricci and P. Fagiani (ISIS), P. Moilanen (STRAFICA), M. van der Hoofd and M. Carmona (TIS), J. Baker (TTR) with contributions from partners Project co-ordinator: ISIS (Italy) Partners: ISIS (It), ADPC (Be), CERAS (Fr), DIW (De), ECOPLAN (Ch), INFRAS (Ch), ITS (UK), IWW (De), KULeuven (Be), LETS (Fr), NEA (Nl), PW (Pl), STRAFICA (Fi), TIS (Pt), TOI (No), TTR (UK) REVENUE D3 CASE STUDIES SPECIFICATION Revenue Use from Transport Pricing Deliverable 3: Case Studies Specification Date: 9th March 2005 Authors: S. Suter and U. Springer (ECOPLAN), A. de Palma and R. Lindsey (adpC), S. van der Loo (KULeuven), A. Ricci and P. Fagiani (ISIS), P. Moilanen (STRAFICA), M. van der Hoofd and M. Carmona (TIS), J. Baker (TTR) This document should be referenced as: S. Suter, U. Springer, A. de Palma, R. Lindsey, S. van der Loo, A. Ricci, P. Fagiani, P. Moilanen, M. van der Hoofd, M. Carmona and J. Baker, (2004), Case Studies Specification, REVENUE Project Deliverable 3. Funded by 5th Framework RTD Programme, ISIS, Rome, 9th March 2005 PROJECT INFORMATION Contract: GMA2-2001-52011 Website: http://www.revenue-eu.org/ Commissioned by: European Commission -
Russian Hybrid Tactics in Georgia
Russian Hybrid Tactics in Georgia Niklas Nilsson SILK ROAD PAPER January 2018 Russian Hybrid Tactics in Georgia Niklas Nilsson © Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program – A Joint Transatlantic Research and Policy Center American Foreign Policy Council, 509 C St NE, Washington D.C. Institute for Security and Development Policy, V. Finnbodavägen 2, Stockholm-Nacka, Sweden www.silkroadstudies.org “Russian Hybrid Tactics in Georgia” is a Silk Road Paper published by the Central Asia- Caucasus Institute and Silk Road Studies Program, Joint Center. The Silk Road Papers Series is the Occasional Paper series of the Joint Center, and addresses topical and timely subjects. The Joint Center is a transatlantic independent and non-profit research and policy center. It has offices in Washington and Stockholm and is affiliated with the American Foreign Policy Council and the Institute for Security and Development Policy. It is the first institution of its kind in Europe and North America, and is firmly established as a leading research and policy center, serving a large and diverse community of analysts, scholars, policy-watchers, business leaders, and journalists. The Joint Center is at the forefront of research on issues of conflict, security, and development in the region. Through its applied research, publications, research cooperation, public lectures, and seminars, it functions as a focal point for academic, policy, and public discussion regarding the region. The opinions and conclusions expressed in this study are those of -
Opening Your Horizons
VINCI RAILWAYS – 2018 ATLAS HORIZONS OPENING YOUR ATLAS Contents Editorial 1 The year at a glance 2 Interview with the CEO 4 An integrated operator model 6 Tours- 8 Bordeaux Operating the line 10 A large-scale commitment 16 Ensuring traffic safety 22 Looking to the future 28 34 Lyon Rhônexpress reaches the 10 million passenger milestone 36 Innovating to enhance the passenger experience 42 Mainland 48 France Managing and maintaining railway telecommunications 50 56 Martinique Caraibus, daily transport 58 Editorial VINCI Railways played a major role in French rail transport in 2018, enabling business and leisure passengers alike to travel at high speed between Tours and Bordeaux and reach Lyon’s airport from its city centre in record time and the utmost comfort. VINCI Railways currently operates across France; through the SYNERAIL subsidiary, it manages the GSM-Rail telecommunications system on the high-speed and regional express rail networks, covering a total of 16,000 km of track across the country. VINCI Railways also maintains reserved lane public transport on a daily basis in Martinique. Everywhere, we commit to meticulously and sustainably managing public infrastructure and participating in the development of the regions where we operate. Read on to find out more about our projects. 1 The year at a glance For VINCI Railways, 2018 was a year of consolidation – including that of the South Europe Atlantic High-Speed Line (SEA HSL) between Tours and Bordeaux, whose commercial success enabled us to finalise one of the largest refinancing operations in Europe. The entire 16,000-km GSM-Rail network, managed by SYNERAIL, is operational and, in Martinique, passengers have started using the island’s first bus rapid transit (BRT) system. -
Study on Border Crossing Practices in International Railway Transport
STUDY ON BORDER CROSSING PRACTICES IN INTERNATIONAL RAILWAY TRANSPORT Bangkok, 2018 This study was prepared by Transport Division ESCAP. The draft of the study was prepared by Mr. Goran Andreev, Consultant, under the supervision of Mr. Sandeep Raj Jain, Economic Affairs Officer, Transport Facilitation and Logistics Section (TFLS), Transport Division. Overall guidance was provided by Mr. Li Yuwei, Director, Transport Division. The study extensively benefited from the visits made by the ESCAP study team to several border crossings (in chronological order): Sukhbaatar (Mongolia), Dong Dang (Viet Nam), Padang Besar (Malaysia), Sarkhas (Islamic Republic of Iran), Rezekne (Latvia). The assistance provided by the railways, customs and other authorities at these border crossings, their officers and staff for the study is duly appreciated. Acknowledgments are also extended to the representatives of Intergovernmental Organisation for International Carriage by Rail (OTIF) and Organisation for Co- operation between Railways (OSJD), for their constructive comments on the draft Study and the contribution in providing valuable inputs on the publication. The views expressed in this guide are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations Secretariat. The opinions, figures and estimates set forth in this guide are the responsibility of the authors, and should not necessarily be considered as reflecting the views or carrying the endorsement of the United Nations. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this study do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. -
Traffic Connectivity in Croatia in the Past: the Dubrovnik Region Case
Athens Journal of History - Volume 1, Issue 3 – Pages 195-204 Traffic Connectivity in Croatia in the Past: The Dubrovnik Region Case By Marija Benić Penava This paper analyses the development of traffic routes in the far south of Croatia during the 19th and 20th century. Poor traffic connectivity was the consequence of traffic policy which was subordinated to the interests of Vienna in the Austro- Hungarian Monarchy, and after World War I, to Belgrade. Since the Dubrovnik region was oriented towards the sea, and since traditionally it had strong entrepreneurship and sea traffic that enabled great economic prosperity of Dubrovnik in the past centuries. Ships flying the flag of Sveti Vlaho (Saint Blaise, the patron saint of the city) were present in the Mediterranean and the world’s oceans, yet the service industry which Dubrovnik provided was completed by tourism only in the Kingdom of Yugoslavia. The perception of Dubrovnik as a world tourist destination was established in the first half of the 20th century and that could only be maintained by quality traffic routes. Therefore it was extremely important for the prosperity of the far south of Croatia to have and retain the best connectivity by railway as well as sea, land and air traffic. Introduction The transition from the eighteenth to the nineteenth century was a period of great economic change in Europe. The discovery of the Watt’s steam engine (1764) enabled mechanical transport, which neither the working animals nor the natural power, on which transportation was dependent previously, could not contest. The steam engine passed the milestone in the field of transport connection. -
Rise and Fall of the Malta Railway After
40 I FEBRUARY 28, 2021 THE SUNDAY TIMES OF MALTA THE SUNDAY TIMES OF MALTA FEBRUARY 28, 2021 I 41 LIFEANDWELLBEING HISTORY Map of the route of It hap~ened in February the Malta Railway /Via/ta Rise and fall Of the VALLETTA Malta Railway after • • • Employees of the Malta Railway pose for a group photograph at its ~naugurat1ons f'famrun Station in 1924. Bombes) on to Hamrun Sta the Attard-Mdina road through Because of debts, calculated to have been in the region of THE MALTA RAILWAY CO. LTD. .in 1883' and 1892 tion. At Hamrun, there was a a 25-yard-long tunnel and then double track w.ith two plat up the final steep climb to £80,000, the line closed down LOCOMOTIVES - SOME TECHNICAL DATA servic.e in Valletta. Plans were The Malta Railways Co. Ltd in forms and side lines leading to Rabat which was the last termi on Tuesday, April 1, 1890, but JOSEPH F. submitted by J. Scott Tucker in augurated its service at 3pm on the workshops which, by 1900, nus till 1900. In that year, the government reopened it on GRIMA 1870, Major Hutchinson in Wednesday, February 28, 1883, were capable of major mainte line was extended via a half Thursday, February 25, 1892. No. Type CyUnders Onches) Builder Worlm No. Data 1873, Architect Edward Rosen amid great enthusiasm. That af nance and engineering work. mile tunnel beneath Mdina to During the closure period, 1. 0-6-0T, 10Yz x 18, Manning Wardle 842, 1882 Retired casual bush in 1873 and George Fer ternoon, the guests were taken Formerly, repairs and renova the Museum Station just below works on buildings were car 2. -
NETWORK STATEMENT of the NATIONAL RAIL NETWORK 2017 Timetable Version 12 of 08 September 2017
NETWORK STATEMENT OF THE NATIONAL RAIL NETWORK 2017 Timetable Version 12 of 08 September 2017 VERSION CONTROL The different versions of this document and their publication date are given below: Version 1 of 30 July 2015 (subject to consultation) Version 2 of 24 September 2015 (subject to consultation) Version 3 of 8 December 2015 (first publication) Version 4 of 18 December 2015 (publication with Stations Statement part A) Version 5 of 29 March 2016 (publication notably with modifications to Line Reference Document) Version 6 of 11 July 2016 (post-consultation ad hoc) Version 7 of 9 September 2016 (minimum services rates) Version 8 of 13 September 2016 (subject to consultation) Version 9 of 9 December 2016 (modified version of publication) Version 10 of 22 May 2017 (publication post-opinion of ARAFER – excluding charging and pricing of service facilities and electricity) Version 11 of 26 July 2017 (publication post-opinion of ARAFER – Stations Statement and Line Reference Document) Version 12 of 08 September 2017 (publication post-opinion of ARAFER – freight yards) The amendments are listed in the table in Appendix 1. SIMPLIFIED VERSION CONTROL CHAPTER 1. GENERAL INFORMATION CHAPTER 2. NATIONAL RAIL NETWORK ACCESS CONDITIONS CHAPTER 3. INFRASTRUCTURE CHAPTER 4. CAPACITY ALLOCATION CHAPTER 5. SERVICES CHAPTER 6. CHARGING 2017 Network Statement – Version of 08 September 2017 SNCF RÉSEAU | 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of appendices List of abbreviations and definitions CHAPTER 1. GENERAL INFORMATION ................................................................ -
Manual on Border Controls Along the Danube and Its Navigable Tributaries
EU Strategy for the Danube Region Priority Area 1a – To improve mobility and multimodality: Inland waterways Practical manual on border controls along the Danube and its navigable tributaries Author(s): Milica Gvozdic (viadonau) Simon Hartl (viadonau) Katja Rosner (viadonau) Version (date): 31.08.2015 1 General information .................................................................................................................. 4 2 How to use this manual? .......................................................................................................... 5 3 Geographic scope .................................................................................................................... 5 4 Hungary ................................................................................................................................... 7 4.1 General information on border controls ................................................................................... 7 4.1.1 Control process ................................................................................................................... 8 4.1.2 Control forms ..................................................................................................................... 10 4.1.3 Additional information ....................................................................................................... 21 4.2 Information on specific border control points ......................................................................... 22 4.2.1 Mohács ............................................................................................................................. -
Bulgaria Railways Policy Note
Agenda – July 19, 2013 at 10:45 – 12:00 a.m. Opening Remarks by H.E. Siniša Hajdaš-Dončić, Minister of Maritime Affairs, Transport and Infrastructure Opening Remarks by Mr. Hongjoo Hahm, Croatia Country Manager, World Bank Presentation of the Croatia Railway Policy Note by Mr. Jean- Francois Marteau, Transport Specialist, World Bank Questions and Answers World Bank 1 Republic of Croatia Railway Policy Note The World Bank July 19, 2013 Zagreb, Croatia World Bank 2 Railway Network Croatia World Bank 3 Croatian Railway Sector Underwent Profound Transformation to Meet the EU Accession Criteria Railway sector came a long way over the past decade: Legal and institutional framework harmonized with the EU Acquis Communautaire Independent regulatory institutions in place Croatian Railways restructured and reorganized towards customer- oriented and competitive business State financial support to railway sector started to decrease As of July 1, 2013 Croatia became integral part of the European transport market, which requires the sustainability of implemented reforms in the railway transport sector and the versatility of railway companies to adapt to market changes World Bank 4 Strong Challenges and Opportunities linked to EU Integration CHALLENGES OPPORTUNITIES •Macro-economic instability and •Sector rationalization and fiscal consolidation – Risk on VS. structural reforms, business Demand opportunities in a liberalized context • Infrastructure modernization •EU Funds availability and EU • Implementation of HŽ priority for Rail Restructuring