DOCSLIB.ORG

The JAMES RIVER DAVENPORT SEARCH, Including LANCELOT, PRINCE GEORGE, and WILLIAMSBURG DAVENPORT Appearances in Various Records

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The JAMES RIVER DAVENPORT SEARCH, Including LANCELOT, PRINCE GEORGE, and WILLIAMSBURG DAVENPORT Appearances in Various Records A Working Paper Towards an Identification, but a Speculative Investigation at Present The JAMES RIVER DAVENPORT SEARCH, including LANCELOT, PRINCE GEORGE, and WILLIAMSBURG DAVENPORT Appearances in Various Records An Inquiry into Colonial Virginia Beginnings Lead Investigator: John Scott Davenport, Ph.D., New Jersey Data Entry and Annotation Current to Wednesday, May 02, 2007 SMALL CAPS, Italics, and Color are used for emphasis, do not appear in sources. © 2007 ▼ Davenport Settlement on Waters of The James THE WORKING HYPOTHESIS The CHRONICLES that follow are compiled on the hypothesis that the James River Davenports were all related, and were, in succession: (1) Lancelot Davenport, who arrived at Jamestown from England on the Ship Duty in 1620; (2) John Davenport, who arrived from England just in time to be killed in the Good Friday Massacre of 1622; (3) Oliver Davenport, a transportee cited in 1673; (4) George Davenport, who came into evidence in 1702 and again in 1713; (5) Joseph Davenport, writing master at William & Mary College for many years, by 1722; (6) Bedford Davenport, who joined brother Joseph in 1737 in transcribing Colonel William Byrd’s notes for the survey of the boundary line between Virginia and North Carolina; (7) Henry Davenport, who was a settler in early Lunenburg County, then went on to North Carolina, then allegedly on to frontier Georgia;(8) Ambrose Davenport, who began in Norfolk, then moved to Sussex, and then to Williamsburg where he was both a dry goods merchant and a tavern operator; (9) a younger Ambrose Davenport, who enlisted in the United States Army in 1792 and 2 finished his days as an Indian trader at Mackinac Island, Michigan; and (10) Thomas, George, Edward, David, Matthew, Daniel, and James Davenport of Prince George County, who began appearing in 1739, and who, in part, moved westward in Virginia and south to North Carolina after the Revolution. The hypothesis includes an assumption of a relatively close family relationship among all the Davenports cited. The inclusion is intentionally comprehensive and is totally speculative at the outset. The research method will be systematic, resulting in a sorting out based on primary and secondary sources within historical reality in investigative analysis, and circumstantial deduction where appropriate. The degree to which the hypothesis has validity will be determined as our investigation proceeds and these Chronicles are compiled. The possibility of more than one family line is real. A Concentrated Geographical Presence With the exception of Lancelot, whose 50-acre patent of 1639 was located eight-to- ten miles to the East in later Surry County, and John Davenport who was killed by Indians almost as soon as he stepped off the ship from England in 1622, both Davenport appearances on the James River prior to 1700 (and all thereafter until Joseph’s appearance in Williamsburg in 1722), were centered within a roughly inverted, triangular area, 12 miles at the base (top), 13 miles on each side, roughly 69 square miles. Since 1702, all of this small territory has been a part of Prince George County, being the easternmost portion of the County above Main Blackwater Swamp. Davenport beginnings appear to have been predominantly in or near the eastern half of that easternmost portion of Prince George, namely in Martin’s Brandon Parish adjoining the Surry County line. Our focus of land interest has received scholarly attention in past years: “Sea captains were especially active in the great tracts at [Martin’s] Brandon and acquisition of land through the transportation Merchants Hope, held by them or their heirs of settlers, and they not infrequently acted for nearly a century.” Robert Armistead conjointly with London merchants. An Stewart, Ph.D., in “Introduction” to Nell instance in point is the case of William Barker, Marion Nugent’s Cavaliers and Pioneers: who, in association with Richard Quiney, Abstracts of Virginia Land Patents and citizen and grocer of London (brother of Grants, Volume One, 1623-1626 (Baltimore: Shakespeare’s son-in-law, Thomas Quiney), Generalogical Publishing Company, 1974. and John Sadler (brother-in-law of John Reprint. Originally published Richmond, Harvard, founder of Harvard College), patented 1934), xxv, Stewart apparently missed the fact that Quiney was also John Sadler’s son-in-law, married to John’s daughter Ellen. Both Stewart and W.G. Stanard, early scholars of Virginia land matters, missed the fact that John Westrope, another London merchant, with substantial acreage near Sadler and Quiney venture on the south side of the James, apparently was Sadler’s illegitimate son. We say “apparently” only because Westrope said 3 it was so and backed up the assertion with four cows, while Sadler’s viewpoint went unrecorded. The land grants that Dr. Stewart singled out in his commentary are precisely those that are at the center of the James River Davenport hypothesis. There likely exists earlier research focused on Merchants Hope and Martin’s Brandon plantations to facilitate our investigation. Keep the names of William Barker, John Sadler and Richard Quiney in mind, for Barker was high profile for the first fifteen years (1634-1649) and his associates Sadler and Quiney, their heirs and assigns, appeared often in records from 1634 until 1720, possibly longer. Be forewarned that ultimately both Merchants Hope and Martin’s Brandon were bought by Nathaniel Harrison, Gentleman, who operated Merchant’s Hope plantation as it was, but divided Martin’s Brandon into two plantations: Upper Brandon and Lower Brandon. A later Harrison combined them into Brandon. “Brandon Plantation is located on the buildings, placed as though they were south side of the James River in Prince intended to be wings of a great house…The George County, Virginia. It is one of the present mansion at Martin’s Brandon was most magnificent and perhaps the oldest built after 1765 by a Nathaniel Harrison. estate on the James River. The garden that Thomas Jefferson designed the main house extends from the house down to the river was as it stands today, using the two and one-half established over three hundred years ago, as story houses built in the 1600s as the north can be proved by the size of ancient dwarf and south wings and joining them to the boxwoods, trees, huge wisteria vine and other center structure.” [Edna Harris Busnell, plantings. The two end wings of the great Terry Records of Virginia (Birmingham, Ala- mansion were built in the 1600s and were bama: Author, 1980)] two four-room, one and one-half story brick Mrs. Bushnell cited the publication Brandon Plantation in Virginia, A National Historical Landmark, but gave no publisher and no date. This investigation has determined that Captain John Martin did not remain at Martin’s Brandon long after the Good Friday Massacre on 1622, but sold his rights to the land. By 1642 it was patented by a syndicate of London merchants, which originally included William Barker, Simon Turges, John Sadler, William Quiney, and Joseph Johnson. Barker, a sea captain, apparently acted as agent for the others, dropped out of the syndicate by 1642, but patented land of his own near The Merchants Land, and became a planter. Barkers heirs subsequently appeared in Charles City/Prince George and Surry records. Later, Captain Joseph Johnson, the only member of the original syndicate who resided in Virginia for any length of time (he arrived in 1618, but was of London, and a Merchant, in 1642), went to Court and obtained an Order giving him his pro-rata share of the venture, namely one-fourth of the syndicate’s Virginia land. That left Simon Turges, John Sadler, and William Quiney as owners. Sometime between 1642, when Johnson took his share and left, and 1713 when John Sadler, Jr., by then a very old man, and Quiney heirs resurveyed and re-patented the Martin’s Brandon tract, which had grown substantially, Simon Turges had dropped out, by conveyance to the remaining principals, and the land became solely Sadler’s and Quiney’s heirs. The Merchants Hope tract was resurveyed and re-patented at the same time. 4 Prior to 1720 when the Quiney share or moiety was sold to Nathaniel Harrison, one Henry Tooke was apparently the Factor and Agent for Ye Merchants Land. Tooke was charged with the tract in the Prince George County Quit Rents of 1704 as well as for a few acres in his own name. However, Tooke’s own manor plantation was on the east side of Upper Chippokes Creek, the divide between Prince George and Surry, and was listed as owing Quit Rents there. In Surry, Tooke was the ranking Magistrate, being No. 1 on the Commission of the Peace, and was Major, second in command, of the Surry Militia. Tooke is buried in the churchyard of old Martin’s Brannon Chapel, now long extinct, in Prince George County on Brandon. The Nathaniel Harrison who acquired the plantations from the surviving Ye Merchants of London died within a decade or so after acquiring the plantations, was not the Nathaniel Harrison who built the landmark plantation house. All of the Brandon plantations of the Harrisons were showplaces. On the opposite side of James were two other Harrison showplaces, namely Berkeley and Weyanoake plantations. Considering the wealth of the Harrisons and the later Presidential connection, a number of secondary resources are surely available for determining the nature of a Davenport-Harrison association, if any. Ambrose Davenport, the colorful Indian trader of Mackinac Island, Michigan Territory, claimed to have been brought up on Harrison plantations on both sides of the James River, and to have been a boyhood chum of William Henry Harrison, subsequently President of the United States.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Jamestown Timeline
    A Jamestown Timeline Christopher Columbus never reached the shores of the North American Continent, but European explorers learned three things from him: there was someplace to go, there was a way to get there, and most importantly, there was a way to get back. Thus began the European exploration of what they referred to as the “New World”. The following timeline details important events in the establishment of the first permanent English settlement in America – Jamestown, Virginia. Preliminary Events 1570s Spanish Jesuits set up an Indian mission on the York River in Virginia. They were killed by the Indians, and the mission was abandoned. Wahunsonacock (Chief Powhatan) inherited a chiefdom of six tribes on the upper James and middle York Rivers. By 1607, he had conquered about 25 other tribes. 1585-1590 Three separate voyages sent English settlers to Roanoke, Virginia (now North Carolina). On the last voyage, John White could not locate the “lost” settlers. 1602 Captain Bartholomew Gosnold explored New England, naming some areas near and including Martha’s Vineyard. 1603 Queen Elizabeth I died; James VI of Scotland became James I of England. Early Settlement Years 1606, April James I of England granted a charter to the Virginia Company to establish colonies in Virginia. The charter named two branches of the Company, the Virginia Company of London and the Virginia Company of Plymouth. 1606, December 20 Three ships – Susan Constant, Godspeed, and Discovery - left London with 105 men and boys to establish a colony in Virginia between 34 and 41 degrees latitude. 1607, April 26 The three ships sighted the land of Virginia, landed at Cape Henry (present day Virginia Beach) and were attacked by Indians.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of the Jamestown Colony: Seventeenth-Century and Modern Interpretations
    The History of the Jamestown Colony: Seventeenth-Century and Modern Interpretations A Senior Honors Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for graduation with research distinction in History in the undergraduate colleges of the Ohio State University By Sarah McBee The Ohio State University at Mansfield June 2009 Project Advisor: Professor Heather Tanner, Department of History Introduction Reevaluating Jamestown On an unexceptional day in December about four hundred years ago, three small ships embarked from an English dock and began the long and treacherous voyage across the Atlantic. The passengers on board envisioned their goals – wealth and discovery, glory and destiny. The promise of a new life hung tantalizingly ahead of them. When they arrived in their new world in May of the next year, they did not know that they were to begin the journey of a nation that would eventually become the United States of America. This summary sounds almost ridiculously idealistic – dream-driven achievers setting out to start over and build for themselves a better world. To the average American citizen, this story appears to be the classic description of the Pilgrims coming to the new world in 1620 seeking religious freedom. But what would the same average American citizen say to the fact that this deceptively idealistic story actually took place almost fourteen years earlier at Jamestown, Virginia? The unfortunate truth is that most people do not know the story of the Jamestown colony, established in 1607.1 Even when people have heard of Jamestown, often it is with a negative connotation. Common knowledge marginally recognizes Jamestown as the colony that predates the Separatists in New England by more than a dozen years, and as the first permanent English settlement in America.
    [Show full text]
  • A Jamestown Timeline
    A Jamestown Timeline Christopher Columbus never reached the shores of the North American Continent, but European explorers learned three things from him: there was someplace to go, there was a way to get there, and most importantly, there was a way to get back. Thus began the European exploration of what they referred to as the “New World”. The following timeline details important events in the establishment of the fi rst permanent English settlement in America – Jamestown, Virginia. PRELIMINARY EVENTS 1570s Spanish Jesuits set up an Indian mission on the York River in Virginia. They were killed by the Indians, and the mission was abandoned. Wahunsonacock (Chief Powhatan) inherited a chiefdom of six tribes on the upper James and middle York Rivers. By 1607, he had conquered about 25 other tribes. 1585-1590 Three separate voyages sent English settlers to Roanoke, Virginia (now North Carolina). On the last voyage, John White could not locate the “lost” settlers. 1602 Captain Bartholomew Gosnold explored New England, naming some areas near and including Martha’s Vineyard. 1603 Queen Elizabeth I died; James VI of Scotland became James I of England. EARLY SETTLEMENT YEARS 1606, April James I of England granted a charter to the Virginia Company to establish colonies in Virginia. The charter named two branches of the Company, the Virginia Company of London and the Virginia Company of Plymouth. 1606, December 20 Three ships – Susan Constant, Godspeed, and Discovery – left London with 105 men and boys to establish a colony in Virginia between 34 and 41 degrees latitude. 1607, April 26 The three ships sighted the land of Virginia, landed at Cape Henry (present day Virginia Beach) and were attacked by Indians.
    [Show full text]
  • Collections of the Virginia Historical Society, in Which Are Also Many Other MSS
    Ml: Gc 975.5 V823C V.7 1219029 GENEALOGY COLLECTION ALLEN COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY 3 1833 00826 8341 COLLECTIONS Virginia Historical Society. New Series. VOL. VII. WM. ELLIS JONES, PRINTER, RICHMOND, VA. ABSTRACT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE VirginiaCompany of London, I 6 I 9— I 624, PREPARED FROM THE RECORDS IN THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS BY CONWAY ROBINSON, AND EDITED WITH AN INTRODUCTION AND NOTES BY R. A. BROCK, Corresponding Secretary and Librarian of the Society. VOL. I. Richmond, Virginia. PUBLISHED BY THE SOCIETY. MDCCCLXXXVIII. /^^ .H 1219029 INTRODUCTION. The essential value of the Proceedings of the Virginia Com- pany of London, towards a due knowledge of the planting of the first of the American Commonwealths, is patent. Although highly useful excerpts from them have been presented by the zealous and indefatigable investigator, Rev. Edward D. Neill, D. D., in his publications illustrative of the early history of Virginia, it is believed that the abstracts now offered will prove an acceptable aggrandizement of his labors, and inasmuch as they were prepared by a scholar of singular discernment— the late eminent jurist, Conway Robinson, whose professional works are held in prime authority and as of enduring worth— it may be hoped, with confidence, that they are comprehensive as to all desirable details. The Virginia Historical Society is greatly indebted to Mr. Robinson for a signal devotion to its interests, which only ceased with his life. He was one of its founders, on December 29th, his removal to Wash- 1831 ; its first treasurer; from 1835 until ington, D. C, in 1869, a member of its " Standing," or Executive Committee, serving for a greater portion of the period as chair- man, and subsequently and continuously as vice-president of the Society.
    [Show full text]
  • Foundingof Thecolonyout Ofwhichamerica Has Grown. By
    Exposition Exposition Edition SftrSRmi* Edition .TIIH DISPATCH FOUNDBD 1850. \yxx\JXJJil rilJlUlJ.lilX HfMO. RICHMOND, VA., SATURDAY, APtflL 27,1907. PRICE TWO CENTS. MAP OF VIRGINIA IN THE EARLY DAYS OF THE COLONY, MADE BY CAPTAIN JOHN SMITH. WoVAVltG IN Ift>mBVLA #ffMri»aa{*#»*fe4w^^ By WALTER of the Out of Which America Has Grown. EDWARD HARRIS. Founding were to seek (o defond Ihoniselvos the who had not- Colony so and "Tho camel hls nose into the American tent fixed purpose, that it has become familiar to ail Americans, employment under tho virgin Queen, they eage'r possible against Indians, Anglo-Saxon got been in the least cordial in their thus far. When tha . nt Jamestown on tho 13th day of May, 1(507," as [ heard Senator although' tho. story of Plymouth Rock, instead of Jamestown, cxcitement in the wilds of America. reception Danlel express lt some years ago. The camel was iwo eenturies for a long time claimed greater space in American histories. Bartholomew Gosnold, a man of rank aud intelligonce, tried party landed at Old Point. thoy opened the box in which were tha gettlng the whole tent to himself. llis final success was but tho I cannot hope to tell anything new. in this story, nor to do for several years to interest capltallsts in his proposed venture in papers naming the councll to rulo the colony. Tho ruling councll culmination of the entrance of his nose when the Engllsh adven- lhore than set down salient facts of the old story. But it is a Virginia. Finally he attractcd the attentlon and excited the was composed of Barfholomew Gosnold, John Smith, Edward turers founded their town on thu James and established in the good time for all Virglnlans and all Americans to refresh tho interest of Captain John Smith.
    [Show full text]
  • Founder Burial Sites in Virginia
    Founder Burial Sites In Virginia Forward This book is presented by the Virginia Society of the Order of Founders and Patriots of America. Virginia burials of male person who resided in Virginia prior to 13 May 1657. Some individuals do not qualify as Founders under the rules of the Order of Founders and Patriots of America. We decided to include their names because they contributed to the history of the Commonwealth of Virginia before 13 May 1657. This document is a work in progress as names will be removed and added as additional references become available. Some names might not even have references but are being inserted as they are being worked on. This project started in 2007 by Mike Lyman as he discovered Founders' Burial Sites in Virginia. Most of the men identified meet the Order of The Founders and Patriots of America requirement to be considered a Founder. All were in the Colonies, specifically Virginia before May 13, 1657. Consequently, many of the references are specifically to prove the arrival or presence before May 13, 1657. This work has been edited/data entry by Past Virginia Governor Jerry Hubbard. Corrections or additions may be mailed to: Donnel J. Hubbard, 200 Elmwood Drive, Culpeper, VA 22701-4028 or emailed to [email protected]. SURNAME: Alymer GIVEN NAME: Justinian BIRTH YEAR: by 1624 BIRTH PLACE: England DEATH DATE: c1667 CEMETERY: 1st Church Kichotan CEMETERY LOCATION: LaSalle & Kenmore Street COUNTY/CITY: Hampton STONE: no SPOUSE: SPOUSE DATES: REMARKS: Reverend of First Church Elizabeth Parish of Hampton, 1644-1667 NOTES: SOURCE: Cavaliers & Pioneers, Patent Books ,No.
    [Show full text]
  • Article 4 Contact 1607 to 1614 Final
    Article 4 The Contact Period – Arrival of first colonists thru the starving time The Powhatan Tribes had been inhabiting the shores of the James River for several centuries when the sun rose on May 13, 1607. On this day the lives of these Indians and many others changed forever. This is the day that 104 English colonists landed at Jamestown Island with the intent of creating a permanent settlement in the New World. This article will provide the reader with insights into the establishment of Jamestown and a brief window into the precarious nature of its existence for its first several years. There were four primary reasons that King James I of England chartered the Virginia Company to go forth and explore the New World. The Crown and the Company investors hoped to find the elusive all-water route to the Orient and all of its treasures; to convert the indigenous population of the New World to Christianity; to find gold for England’s treasury; and finally to export raw and manufactured goods for investor profit. None of these goals were ever really met as the Indians resisted proselytizing, manufacturing projects were clearly not lucrative, and there was no gold for the taking. The Virginia Company charter of 1606 granted the investors an area of 100 miles along the coastline and 100 miles inland. This area included what we now know as Governor’s Land at the mouth of the Chickahominy River. The charter was revised in 1609 giving the Virginia Company 200 miles of coastline north and south of the mouth of the James River and all the land east and west from sea to sea.
    [Show full text]
  • Larry Minard Scott County Supervisor Scott County 175Th Anniversary
    38 Years of Rotary Service They profit most who serve the best ROTARY CLUB OF NORTH SCOTT - BULLETIN Vol. 40 No. 9 www.northscottrotary.org e-mail [email protected] March 7, 2012 FRIDAY—AT THE STEEPLEGATE Larry Minard Scott County Supervisor Scott County 175th Anniversary When Scott County was established in 1837, the area that is now Iowa was part of the Wisconsin Territory. Iowa hadn’t become a state yet and neither had Wisconsin. The first towns in the county were Buffalo, Davenport and Rockingham. When it came time to choose a county seat by election, both Davenport and Rockingham were in the running. Davenport won in the first go-round, but Rockingham Larry Minard has served continuously on the Scott cried fraud and a new election was called. That time, County Board of Supervisors since first being elected in Rockingham carried the day and it was Davenport 2000. He was Chair of the Board in 2005 and 2006. residents who cried fraud. Supervisor Minard came to Davenport in 1968 as a The third time around, there was another competitor, teacher and as Head of the Language Arts Department at Central High School, continuing in that position until his Winfield, at the mouth of Duck Creek. retirement from teaching in 1999. Then, according to “An Early History of Scott County,” In the 1980's, Minard was elected to five terms to the taken from the 1902 Scott County Atlas, “a strange sort of Davenport City Council. He also served for 11 years on race took place.” the Scott County Landfill Commission, two years on (As though what had happened previously wasn’t Davenport's Zoning Board of Adjustment, and for two years on the committee that distributes Community strange.) Development Block Grant monies.
    [Show full text]
  • With So Many Sick, John Smith Became the Lead Trade Negotiator
    John Smith and Jamestown: A Different Interpretation--Part II Written by Mr. Schloeder Taken from Marooned : Jamestown, ​ Shipwreck and a New History of America’s Origin by Joseph Kelly and ​ "Abundance of Blood Shed on Both Sides": England's First Indian War, 1609-1614 by J. Frederick Fausz ​ ​ With so many sick, John Smith became the lead trade negotiator for the colony -- his title was the “cape merchant.” Smith revels in his writing of all the success he has trading. What is left out by Smith and the other Gentlemen is that the only reason the Indians traded with Jamestown was because their newest tribesmen (the former colonists) asked Wahunsonacock and informed him that Jamestown had many valuable items to trade for food. Smith’s success angered the Gentlemen and fractions amongst the colonists arose. Ratcliffe and Archer wanted to sail the pinnace back to England. Smith and John Martin wanted the pinnace to trade further up river. Goerge Kendall, a follower of Smith, was accused of being a Spanish spy and executed. John Smith leaves Jamestown to trade and is kidnapped. It is here that the legend of Pocahontas was born. In fact, it was another character from Blood on the River that Wahunsonacock turned to for ​ advice as to what to do with Smith and the Jamestown colony. Namontack, although a teenager, was trusted by Wahunsonacock because of his loyalty as if he were family. Namontack was intelligent, subtle and circumspect and Wahunsonacock schooled him on the diplomacy of being an important member of the Powhatan nation. It is not an accident that Namontack appears in Jamestown frequently and travels to England twice in his lifetime.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Factors Affecting the Establishment and Growth of Richard Bland College of the College of William and Mary in Virginia 1958-1972
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 1981 Political factors affecting the establishment and growth of Richard Bland College of the College of William and Mary in Virginia 1958-1972 James B. McNeer College of William & Mary - School of Education Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the Higher Education Commons Recommended Citation McNeer, James B., "Political factors affecting the establishment and growth of Richard Bland College of the College of William and Mary in Virginia 1958-1972" (1981). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539618656. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.25774/w4-k8e1-wf63 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This was produced from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or "target” for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)”. If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting through an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure you of complete continuity.
    [Show full text]
  • Choctaw Code Talkers of WWI and WWII
    They Served They Sacrificed Telephone Warriors Choctaw Code Talkers Soldiers who used their native language as a weapon against the enemy, making a marked difference in the outcome of World War I Telephone Warriors - beginning the weapon of words Among the Choctaw warriors of WWI were fifteen members of the 142nd Infantry Regiment, a member of the 143rd and two members of the 141st Infantry Regiment who are now heralded as “WWI Choctaw Code Talkers.” All Regiments were part of the 36th Division. The Code Talkers from the 142nd were: Solomon Bond Lewis; Mitchell Bobb; Robert Taylor; Calvin Wilson; Pete Maytubby; James M. Edwards; Jeff Nelson; Tobias William Frazier; Benjamin W. Hampton; Albert Billy; Walter Veach; Joseph Davenport; George Davenport; Noel Johnson; and Ben Colbert. The member of the 143rd was Victor Brown and the Choctaw Code Talkers in the 141st were Ben Carterby and Joseph Okla- hombi. Otis Leader served in the 1sr Division, 16th Infantry. All of these soldiers came together in WWI in France in October and November of 1918 to fight as a unified force against the enemy. On October 1, 1917, the 142nd was organized as regular infantry and given training at Camp Bowie near Fort Worth as part of the 36th Division. Transferred to France for action, the first unit of the division arrived in France, May 31, 1918, and the last August 12, 1918. The 36th Division moved to the western front on October 6, 1918. Although the American forces were late in entering the war that had begun in 1914, their participation provided the margin of victory as the war came to the end.
    [Show full text]
  • English Settlements in Virginia (1584 - 1699)
    English Settlements in Virginia (1584 - 1699) Student Name: _______________________________________ Date: ____________________ For each of the following slides/questions, fill-in-the-blanks: Question# Statement(s) 1. The period of English settlements covered in this presentation is from 1584 to __________. 2. Sir Walter __________________ put together the first English exploration and voyage to the environs of Old Virginia in 1584. 3. The first English settlement in Old Virginia was called the ___________ Colony because its settlers disappeared when the colony was visited by Sir Walter Raleigh’s men in 1590. 4. Meat in the diet of Roanoke Indians was most probably ______________ (beef, birds, fish, or sheep). 5. Because of the warm climate at Roanoke, Indians wore _______________ (lots or little) clothing. 6. Roanoke Indian celebrations included ____________________ (dancing, swimming, fishing, hunting). 7.. Jamestown was the 1st ____________________ English settlement in the New World. 8. Jamestown was named after King __________________ of England who chartered entrepreneurs called the Virginia Company. 9 The 1st Jamestown landing occurred on _______________ , ______. 10. The Virginia Company charter encouraged that its entrepreneurs “take great care not to offend the _______________”. 11. The James River channel at Jamestown was __________________ (deep or shallow) so that ships could be tied easily to the shore. 12. England’s arch enemy at the time of Jamestown’s settlement was ________________ (France, Italy, Portugal, Spain). 13. Fort James was a __________________(square, round, triangular) fort. English Settlements in Virginia (1584 - 1699) Response sheet page 2 of 4 Question# Statement(s) 14 The ________________________ (laborers, leaders, or gentlemen) were unprepared for life in the wilderness.
    [Show full text]