DOCSLIB.ORG

Nomina Insecta Nearctica Alternative Family Names

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Nomina Insecta Nearctica Alternative Family Names 257 NOMINA INSECTA NEARCTICA Eurymelidae (see Cicadellidae) ALTERNATIVE FAMILY NAMES Euscelidae (see Cicadellidae) Evacanthidae (see Cicadellidae) The purpose of this section is to list some alternative Flatidae family names the user might encounter in the Fulgoridae Homoptera. This list is not an exhaustive list of family (Gengidae not NA) Greenideidae (see Aphididae) group names, but is only included for the convenience Gyponidae (see Cicadellidae) of the users of the check list. The abbreviation (not (Halimococcidae not NA) NA) stand for not North American, ie. the family is not Hecalidae (see Cicadellidae) found in the Nearctic region north of the US-Mexico Homotomidae Hoplophoridae (see Membracidae) border. Hormaphididae (see Aphididae) Hylicidae (see Cicadellidae) (Hypochthonellidae not NA) (Acanaloniidae not NA) Iassidae (see Cicadellidae) Acanthococcidae (see Eriococcidae) Idioceridae (see Cicadellidae) Achilidae Issidae (Achilixiidae not NA) Jascopidae (see Cicadellidae) Aclerdidae Jassidae (see Cicadellidae) Adelgidae Kermesidae Aetalionidae Kermococcidae (see Kermesidae) Agalliidae (see Cicadellidae) Kerriidae (see Tachardiidae) Aleyrodidae Kinnaridae Anoeciidae (see Aphididae) Krisnidae (see Cicadellidae) Aphalaridae Lacciferidae (see Tachardiidae) Aphididae Lachnidae (see Aphididae) Aphrodidae (see Cicadellidae) Laternariidae (see Fulgoridae) Aphrophoridae (see Cercopidae) Lecaniidae (see Coccidae) Apiomorphidae (see Eriococcidae) Lecanodiaspididae Araeopidae (see Delphacidae) Ledridae (see Cicadellidae) Asiracidae (see Delphacidae) Lepidosaphidae (see Diaspididae) Asterolecaniidae (Lophopidae not NA) Balcluthidae (see Cicadellidae) Lystridae (see Fulgoridae) (Beesoniidae not NA) (Machaerotidae not NA) (Biturritiidae not NA) Macropsidae (see Cicadellidae) Brachyscelidae (see Eriococcidae) Macrostelidae (see Cicadellidae) Bythoscopidae (see (Cicadellidae) Margarodidae Calophyidae (Meenoplidae not NA) Canceraspididae (see Eriococcidae) Membracidae (Carayonemidae not NA) (Micrococcidae not NA) (Carsidaridae not NA) Mindaridae (see Aphididae) Centrotidae (see Membracidae) Monophlebidae (see Margarodidae) Cercopidae (Nicomiidae not NA) Cerococcidae Nirvanidae (see Cicadellidae Cicadellidae (Nogodinidae not NA) Cicadidae Ortheziidae Cixiidae Paropidae (see Cicadellidae) Clastopteridae (see Cercopidae) Pemphigidae (see Aphididae) Coccidae (Phacopteronidae not NA) Coelidiidae (see Cicadellidae) (Phenacoleachidae not NA) Conchaspididae Phloeomyzidae (see Aphididae) Cryptococcidae (see Eriococcidae) Phoenicococcidae Cylindrococcidae (see Eriococcidae) Phylloxeridae Dactylopiidae Platypediidae (see Cicadidae) Darnidae (see Membracidae) Plautillidae (see Cicadidae) Delphacidae Porphyrophoridae (see Margarodidae) Deltocephalidae (see Cicadellidae) Proconiidae (see Cicadellidae) Derbidae Pseudococcidae Diaspididae Pseudophanidae (see Dictyopharidae) Dictyopharidae Psyllidae Drabescidae (see Cicadellidae) Putoidae (see Pseudococcidae) Drepanosiphidae (see Aphididae) (Ricaniidae not NA) Eriococcidae Smiliidae (see Membracidae) Errhomenellidae (see Cicadellidae) Tachardiidae Eufulgoridae (see Fulgoridae) Tartessidae (see Cicadellidae) Eupterygidae (see Cicadellidae) (Eurybrachidae not NA) HOMOPTERA: ALTERNATIVE FAMILY NAMES 258 NOMINA INSECTA NEARCTICA Termitococcidae (see Margarodidae) Tettigadidae (see Cicadidae) (Tettigarctidae not NA) Tettigellidae (see Cicadellidae) (Tettigometridae not NA) Thelaxidae (see Aphididae) Tibicinidae (see Cicadidae) Triozidae Tropiduchidae Typhlocybidae (see Cicadellidae) Ulopidae (see Cicadellidae) Xestocephalidae (see Cicadellidae) Xylococcidae (see Margarodidae) STATISTICS Family # Names # Valid Achilidae 57 53 Aclerdidae 14 14 Adelgidae 33 21 Aetalionidae 12 7 Aleyrodidae 156 98 Aphalaridae 114 94 Aphididae 1920 1368 Asterolecaniidae 27 16 Calophyidae 15 12 Cercopidae 194 66 Cerococcidae 6 5 Cicadellidae 4264 3195 Cicadidae 251 178 Cixiidae 234 186 Coccidae 317 105 Conchaspididae 5 2 Dactylopiidae 8 4 Delphacidae 413 302 Derbidae 80 70 Diaspididae 592 310 Dictyopharidae 83 63 Eriococcidae 105 81 Flatidae 47 35 Fulgoridae 21 18 Homotomidae 1 1 Issidae 188 154 Kermesidae 37 33 Kinnaridae 7 7 Lecanodiaspididae 9 9 Margarodidae 47 45 Membracidae 495 257 Ortheziidae 37 31 Phoenicococcidae 2 1 Pseudococcidae 471 323 Phylloxeridae 53 45 Psyllidae 172 131 Tachardiidae 10 7 Triozidae 115 69 Tropiduchidae 5 4 Total 10619 7422 HOMOPTERA: ALTERNATIVE FAMILY NAMES, STATISTICS .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Morphology and Adaptation of Immature Stages of Hemipteran Insects
    © 2019 JETIR January 2019, Volume 6, Issue 1 www.jetir.org (ISSN-2349-5162) Morphology and Adaptation of Immature Stages of Hemipteran Insects Devina Seram and Yendrembam K Devi Assistant Professor, School of Agriculture, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab Introduction Insect Adaptations An adaptation is an environmental change so an insect can better fit in and have a better chance of living. Insects are modified in many ways according to their environment. Insects can have adapted legs, mouthparts, body shapes, etc. which makes them easier to survive in the environment that they live in and these adaptations also help them get away from predators and other natural enemies. Here are some adaptations in the immature stages of important families of Hemiptera. Hemiptera are hemimetabolous exopterygotes with only egg and nymphal immature stages and are divided into two sub-orders, homoptera and heteroptera. The immature stages of homopteran families include Delphacidae, Fulgoridae, Cercopidae, Cicadidae, Membracidae, Cicadellidae, Psyllidae, Aleyrodidae, Aphididae, Phylloxeridae, Coccidae, Pseudococcidae, Diaspididae and heteropteran families Notonectidae, Corixidae, Belastomatidae, Nepidae, Hydrometridae, Gerridae, Veliidae, Cimicidae, Reduviidae, Pentatomidae, Lygaeidae, Coreidae, Tingitidae, Miridae will be discussed. Homopteran families 1. Delphacidae – Eg. plant hoppers They comprise the largest family of plant hoppers and are characterized by the presence of large, flattened spurs at the apex of their hind tibiae. Eggs are deposited inside plant tissues, elliptical in shape, colourless to whitish. Nymphs are similar in appearance to adults except for size, colour, under- developed wing pads and genitalia. 2. Fulgoridae – Eg. lantern bugs They can be recognized with their antennae inserted on the sides & beneath the eyes.
    [Show full text]
  • Based on Comparative Morphological Data AF Emel'yanov Transactions of T
    The phylogeny of the Cicadina (Homoptera, Cicadina) based on comparative morphological data A.F. Emel’yanov Transactions of the All-Union Entomological Society Morphological principles of insect phylogeny The phylogenetic relationships of the principal groups of cicadine* insects have been considered on more than one occasion, commencing with Osborn (1895). Some phylogenetic schemes have been based only on data relating to contemporary cicadines, i.e. predominantly on comparative morphological data (Kirkaldy, 1910; Pruthi, 1925; Spooner, 1939; Kramer, 1950; Evans, 1963; Qadri, 1967; Hamilton, 1981; Savinov, 1984a), while others have been constructed with consideration given to paleontological material (Handlirsch, 1908; Tillyard, 1919; Shcherbakov, 1984). As the most primitive group of the cicadines have been considered either the Fulgoroidea (Kirkaldy, 1910; Evans, 1963), mainly because they possess a small clypeus, or the cicadas (Osborn, 1895; Savinov, 1984), mainly because they do not jump. In some schemes even the monophyletism of the cicadines has been denied (Handlirsch, 1908; Pruthi, 1925; Spooner, 1939; Hamilton, 1981), or more precisely in these schemes the Sternorrhyncha were entirely or partially depicted between the Fulgoroidea and the other cicadines. In such schemes in which the Fulgoroidea were accepted as an independent group, among the remaining cicadines the cicadas were depicted as branching out first (Kirkaldy, 1910; Hamilton, 1981; Savinov, 1984a), while the Cercopoidea and Cicadelloidea separated out last, and in the most widely acknowledged systematic scheme of Evans (1946b**) the last two superfamilies, as the Cicadellomorpha, were contrasted to the Cicadomorpha and the Fulgoromorpha. At the present time, however, the view affirming the equivalence of the four contemporary superfamilies and the absence of a closer relationship between the Cercopoidea and Cicadelloidea (Evans, 1963; Emel’yanov, 1977) is gaining ground.
    [Show full text]
  • <I>Tibraca Limbativentris</I> (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae)
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Publications: Department of Entomology Entomology, Department of 2018 Resistance in Rice to Tibraca limbativentris (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) Influenced yb Plant Silicon Content Lincoln Luis França University of Goias State, Unidade Universitária de Ipameri, [email protected] Cássio Antonio Dierings Federal Goiano Institute, Campus Urutaí, Rodovia, [email protected] André Cirilo de Sousa Almeida Federal Goiano Institute, Campus Urutaí, Rodovia, [email protected] Marcio da Silva Araújo University of Goias State, Unidade Universitária de Ipameri Elvis Arden Heinrichs University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologyfacpub Part of the Agriculture Commons, and the Entomology Commons França, Lincoln Luis; Dierings, Cássio Antonio; de Sousa Almeida, André Cirilo; Araújo, Marcio da Silva; Heinrichs, Elvis Arden; da Silva, Anderson Rodrigo; Freitas Barrigossi, José Alexandre; and de Jesus, Flávio Gonçalves, "Resistance in Rice to Tibraca limbativentris (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) Influenced yb Plant Silicon Content" (2018). Faculty Publications: Department of Entomology. 900. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologyfacpub/900 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Entomology, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications:
    [Show full text]
  • Zootaxa,Phylogeny and Higher Classification of the Scale Insects
    Zootaxa 1668: 413–425 (2007) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2007 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Phylogeny and higher classification of the scale insects (Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha: Coccoidea)* P.J. GULLAN1 AND L.G. COOK2 1Department of Entomology, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected] 2School of Integrative Biology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia. Email: [email protected] *In: Zhang, Z.-Q. & Shear, W.A. (Eds) (2007) Linnaeus Tercentenary: Progress in Invertebrate Taxonomy. Zootaxa, 1668, 1–766. Table of contents Abstract . .413 Introduction . .413 A review of archaeococcoid classification and relationships . 416 A review of neococcoid classification and relationships . .420 Future directions . .421 Acknowledgements . .422 References . .422 Abstract The superfamily Coccoidea contains nearly 8000 species of plant-feeding hemipterans comprising up to 32 families divided traditionally into two informal groups, the archaeococcoids and the neococcoids. The neococcoids form a mono- phyletic group supported by both morphological and genetic data. In contrast, the monophyly of the archaeococcoids is uncertain and the higher level ranks within it have been controversial, particularly since the late Professor Jan Koteja introduced his multi-family classification for scale insects in 1974. Recent phylogenetic studies using molecular and morphological data support the recognition of up to 15 extant families of archaeococcoids, including 11 families for the former Margarodidae sensu lato, vindicating Koteja’s views. Archaeococcoids are represented better in the fossil record than neococcoids, and have an adequate record through the Tertiary and Cretaceous but almost no putative coccoid fos- sils are known from earlier.
    [Show full text]
  • Author Index to USDA Technical Bulletins
    USD Index to USDA United States Department of Agriculture Technical Bulletins Compiled in March 2003 by: ARS Ellen Kay Miller Agricultural D.C. Reference Center Research Service National Agricultural Library Agricultural Research Service U.S. Department of Agriculture NAL Updated November 2003 National Agricultural Library National Agricultural Library Cataloging Record: Miller, Ellen K. Index to USDA Technical Bulletins 1. United States. Dept. of Agriculture--Periodicals, Indexes. I. Title. aZ5073.I52-1993 Contents USDA Technical Bulletins by Title USDA Technical Bulletins by Number - 1-1906 Subject Index (with links to Bulletin Title) Author Index (with links to Bulletin Title) The National Agricultural Library call number of each Agriculture Information Bulletin is (1--Ag84Te-no.xxx), where xxx is the series document number of the publication. Titles held by the National Agricultural Library can be verified in the Library's AGRICOLA database. To obtain copies of these documents, contact your local or state libraries, including public libraries, land-grant university libraries, or other large research libraries. Note: An older edition of this document was published in 1993: Index to USDA Technical Bulletins, Numbers 1-1802. The current edition is an Internet-based document, and includes links to full-text USDA Technical Bulletins on the Internet. Technical Bulletins by Title Skip Navigation Bar | By Title | By Number | Subject Index | Author Index Go to: A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | A Accounting for the environment in agriculture. Hrubovcak, James; LeBlanc, Michael, and Eakin, B.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Imidacloprid and Horticultural Oil on Nonâ•Fitarget
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 8-2007 Impact of Imidacloprid and Horticultural Oil on Non–target Phytophagous and Transient Canopy Insects Associated with Eastern Hemlock, Tsuga canadensis (L.) Carrieré, in the Southern Appalachians Carla Irene Dilling University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Dilling, Carla Irene, "Impact of Imidacloprid and Horticultural Oil on Non–target Phytophagous and Transient Canopy Insects Associated with Eastern Hemlock, Tsuga canadensis (L.) Carrieré, in the Southern Appalachians. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2007. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/120 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Carla Irene Dilling entitled "Impact of Imidacloprid and Horticultural Oil on Non–target Phytophagous and Transient Canopy Insects Associated with Eastern Hemlock, Tsuga canadensis (L.) Carrieré, in the Southern Appalachians." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Entomology and Plant Pathology. Paris L. Lambdin, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Jerome Grant, Nathan Sanders, James Rhea, Nicole Labbé Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Prairie Restoration on Hemiptera
    CAN THE ONE TRUE BUG BE THE ONE TRUE ANSWER? THE INFLUENCE OF PRAIRIE RESTORATION ON HEMIPTERA COMPOSITION Thesis Submitted to The College of Arts and Sciences of the UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree of Master of Science in Biology By Stephanie Kay Gunter, B.A. Dayton, Ohio August 2021 CAN THE ONE TRUE BUG BE THE ONE TRUE ANSWER? THE INFLUENCE OF PRAIRIE RESTORATION ON HEMIPTERA COMPOSITION Name: Gunter, Stephanie Kay APPROVED BY: Chelse M. Prather, Ph.D. Faculty Advisor Associate Professor Department of Biology Ryan W. McEwan, Ph.D. Committee Member Associate Professor Department of Biology Mark G. Nielsen Ph.D. Committee Member Associate Professor Department of Biology ii © Copyright by Stephanie Kay Gunter All rights reserved 2021 iii ABSTRACT CAN THE ONE TRUE BUG BE THE ONE TRUE ANSWER? THE INFLUENCE OF PRAIRIE RESTORATION ON HEMIPTERA COMPOSITION Name: Gunter, Stephanie Kay University of Dayton Advisor: Dr. Chelse M. Prather Ohio historically hosted a patchwork of tallgrass prairies, which provided habitat for native species and prevented erosion. As these vulnerable habitats have declined in the last 200 years due to increased human land use, restorations of these ecosystems have increased, and it is important to evaluate their success. The Hemiptera (true bugs) are an abundant and varied order of insects including leafhoppers, aphids, cicadas, stink bugs, and more. They play important roles in grassland ecosystems, feeding on plant sap and providing prey to predators. Hemipteran abundance and composition can respond to grassland restorations, age of restoration, and size and isolation of habitat.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Old World Climbing Fern (Lygodium Microphyllum (Cav.) R
    THE EFFECT OF OLD WORLD CLIMBING FERN (LYGODIUM MICROPHYLLUM (CAV.) R. BROWN) ON SOUTH FLORIDA CYPRESS (TAXODIUM DISTICHUM (L.) RICH.) SWAMP PLANT AND INSECT COMMUNITY STRUCTURE By DANIEL WAYNE CLARK A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2002 Copyright 2002 by Daniel Wayne Clark This thesis is respectfully dedicated to my grandparents, Richard and Elizabeth McKenna and Charles and Agnes Clark for their years of selfless love and unwavering support. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to express my sincere appreciation to Dr. Randall Stocker, who chaired my graduate supervisory committee, directed my research program, and provided me with personal guidance and friendship throughout my graduate program. He was truly a mentor and continues to impress me with his ability to adapt publicly to any audience and end up being the focal individual for relevant information, professionalism and leadership. These people skills combined with his academic expertise continue to make him sought after at local, national and international levels professionally. Dr. Alison Fox served as an Agronomy Department representative to my supervisory committee. She provided much needed technical support, critical review and focus during the scholastic, research and writing phases of my project. I also thank her for her personal friendship and professional guidance. She selflessly made time for unscheduled meetings and was always available for consultation. Her energetic and personable nature facilitated numerous stimulating discussions and empowered me to increase my own scientific and critical thought. Dr. Katie Sieving, an external representative of my committee from the Wildlife Ecology and Conservation Department, imparted to me the sheer fun of being academic.
    [Show full text]
  • Insects & Spiders of Kanha Tiger Reserve
    Some Insects & Spiders of Kanha Tiger Reserve Some by Aniruddha Dhamorikar Insects & Spiders of Kanha Tiger Reserve Aniruddha Dhamorikar 1 2 Study of some Insect orders (Insecta) and Spiders (Arachnida: Araneae) of Kanha Tiger Reserve by The Corbett Foundation Project investigator Aniruddha Dhamorikar Expert advisors Kedar Gore Dr Amol Patwardhan Dr Ashish Tiple Declaration This report is submitted in the fulfillment of the project initiated by The Corbett Foundation under the permission received from the PCCF (Wildlife), Madhya Pradesh, Bhopal, communication code क्रम 車क/ तकनीकी-I / 386 dated January 20, 2014. Kanha Office Admin office Village Baherakhar, P.O. Nikkum 81-88, Atlanta, 8th Floor, 209, Dist Balaghat, Nariman Point, Mumbai, Madhya Pradesh 481116 Maharashtra 400021 Tel.: +91 7636290300 Tel.: +91 22 614666400 [email protected] www.corbettfoundation.org 3 Some Insects and Spiders of Kanha Tiger Reserve by Aniruddha Dhamorikar © The Corbett Foundation. 2015. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be used, reproduced, or transmitted in any form (electronic and in print) for commercial purposes. This book is meant for educational purposes only, and can be reproduced or transmitted electronically or in print with due credit to the author and the publisher. All images are © Aniruddha Dhamorikar unless otherwise mentioned. Image credits (used under Creative Commons): Amol Patwardhan: Mottled emigrant (plate 1.l) Dinesh Valke: Whirligig beetle (plate 10.h) Jeffrey W. Lotz: Kerria lacca (plate 14.o) Piotr Naskrecki, Bud bug (plate 17.e) Beatriz Moisset: Sweat bee (plate 26.h) Lindsay Condon: Mole cricket (plate 28.l) Ashish Tiple: Common hooktail (plate 29.d) Ashish Tiple: Common clubtail (plate 29.e) Aleksandr: Lacewing larva (plate 34.c) Jeff Holman: Flea (plate 35.j) Kosta Mumcuoglu: Louse (plate 35.m) Erturac: Flea (plate 35.n) Cover: Amyciaea forticeps preying on Oecophylla smargdina, with a kleptoparasitic Phorid fly sharing in the meal.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Entomologist Published by the Florida Entomological Society Volume 99, Number 3 — September 2016
    Florida Entomologist Published by the Florida Entomological Society Volume 99, Number 3 — September 2016 Research Papers Romo-Asunción, Diana, Marco Antonio Ávila-Calderón, Miguel Angel Ramos-López, Juan Esteban Barranco-Florido, Silvia Rodríguez-Navarro, Sergio Romero-Gomez, Eugenia Josefina Aldeco-Pérez, Juan Ramiro Pacheco-Aguilar, and Miguel Angel Rico-Rodríguez—Juvenomimetic and insecticidal activitiesSenecio of salignus (Asteraceae) and Salvia microphylla (Lamiaceae) on Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) . 345-351 Barroso-Aké, Hanzel J., Juan Cibrián-Tovar, Obdulia L. Segura-León, and Ausencio Azuara-Domínguez—Pre-courtship behavior and the effect of age on its duration in Diatraea magnifactella (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) . 352-354 Sisson, Melissa S., Carlos A. Santamaria, Autumn J. Smith-Herron, Tamara J. Cook, and Jerry L. Cook—Geographical color pattern of Argia apicalis (Odonata: Coenagrionidae) in the absence of molecular variation . 355-362 Tillman, P. Glynn and Ted E. Cottrell—Stink bugs (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) in pheromone-baited traps near crop field edges in Georgia, USA . 363-370 Song, YueHua, ZiZhong Li, and RenHuai Dai—A remarkable new genus and species of Erythroneurini (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Typhlocybinae) from China . 371-375 Hernández-Baz, Fernando, Helena Romo, Jorge M. González, María de Jesús Martínez Hernández, and Roberto Gámez Pastrana—Maximum entropy niche-based modeling (Maxent) of potential geographical distribution of Coreura albicosta (Lepidoptera: Erebidae: Ctenuchina) in Mexico . 376-380 Bortoli, Lígia Caroline, Ruben Machota Jr., Flávio Roberto Mello Garcia, and Marcos Botton—Evaluation of food lures for fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) captured in a citrus orchard of the Serra Gaúcha . 381-384 Zheng, Min-Lin, Cornelis van Achterberg, and Jia-Hua Chen—A new species of the genus Proantrusa Tobias (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Alysiinae) from northwestern China .
    [Show full text]
  • A New Pupillarial Scale Insect (Hemiptera: Coccoidea: Eriococcidae) from Angophora in Coastal New South Wales, Australia
    Zootaxa 4117 (1): 085–100 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2016 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4117.1.4 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5C240849-6842-44B0-AD9F-DFB25038B675 A new pupillarial scale insect (Hemiptera: Coccoidea: Eriococcidae) from Angophora in coastal New South Wales, Australia PENNY J. GULLAN1,3 & DOUGLAS J. WILLIAMS2 1Division of Evolution, Ecology & Genetics, Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, Acton, Canberra, A.C.T. 2601, Australia 2The Natural History Museum, Department of Life Sciences (Entomology), London SW7 5BD, UK 3Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract A new scale insect, Aolacoccus angophorae gen. nov. and sp. nov. (Eriococcidae), is described from the bark of Ango- phora (Myrtaceae) growing in the Sydney area of New South Wales, Australia. These insects do not produce honeydew, are not ant-tended and probably feed on cortical parenchyma. The adult female is pupillarial as it is retained within the cuticle of the penultimate (second) instar. The crawlers (mobile first-instar nymphs) emerge via a flap or operculum at the posterior end of the abdomen of the second-instar exuviae. The adult and second-instar females, second-instar male and first-instar nymph, as well as salient features of the apterous adult male, are described and illustrated. The adult female of this new taxon has some morphological similarities to females of the non-pupillarial palm scale Phoenicococcus marlatti Cockerell (Phoenicococcidae), the pupillarial palm scales (Halimococcidae) and some pupillarial genera of armoured scales (Diaspididae), but is related to other Australian Myrtaceae-feeding eriococcids.
    [Show full text]
  • The Planthopper Genus <I>Acanalonia </I>In the United
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Insecta Mundi Florida September 1995 The planthopper genus Acanalonia in the United States (Homoptera: Issidae): male and female genitalic morphology Rebecca Freund University of South Dakota, Vermillion, SD Stephen W. Wilson Central Missouri State University, Warrensburg, MO Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi Part of the Entomology Commons Freund, Rebecca and Wilson, Stephen W., "The planthopper genus Acanalonia in the United States (Homoptera: Issidae): male and female genitalic morphology" (1995). Insecta Mundi. 133. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi/133 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Florida at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Insecta Mundi by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. INSECTA MUNDI, Vol. 9, No. 3-4, September - December, 1995 195 The planthopper genus Acanalonia in the United States (Homoptera: Issidae): male and female genitalic morphology Rebecca Freund Department of Biology, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, SD 57069 and Stephen W. Wilson Department of Biology, Central Missouri State University, Warrensburg, MO 64093 Abstract: The issidplanthopper genus Acanalonia is reviewed anda key to the 18 speciesprovided. Detailed descriptions and illustrationsof the complete external morphology ofA. conica (Say), anddescriptionsandillustrationsof the male and female external genitalia ofthe species ofunited States Acanalonia are given. The principal genitalic features usedto separate species included: male - shape andlength ofthe aedeagalcaudal andlateralprocesses, and presence ofcaudalextensions; female -shape ofthe 8th abdominal segment and the number of teeth on the gonapophysis ofthe 8th segment.
    [Show full text]