DOCSLIB.ORG

LONDON BOROUGH of HAMMERSMITH and FULHAM UPDATED SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 47065080 April 2015 I

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
LONDON BOROUGH of HAMMERSMITH and FULHAM UPDATED SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 47065080 April 2015 I London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham Updated Surface Water Management Plan April 2015 UNITED KINGDOM & IRELAND Prepared for: 47065080 REVISION SCHEDULE Rev Date Details Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by 1 December Draft for client comment Danielle Skilton Emily Craven Jon Robinson 2013 Flood Risk Principal Operations Consultant Consultant Director 2 January Final Draft Danielle Skilton Emily Craven Jon Robinson 2014 Flood Risk Principal Operations Consultant Consultant Director 3 May 2014 Final Danielle Skilton Emily Craven Jon Robinson Flood Risk Principal Operations Consultant Consultant Director 4 June 2014 Final Revision Danielle Skilton Jon Robinson Jon Robinson Flood Risk Operations Operations Consultant Director Director 5 April 2015 Updated with revised Sarah Littlewood Matthew Ince Michael Timmins modelling for client comment Consultant Principal Flood Technical Director Risk Consultant URS Infrastructure & Environment UK Ltd. 6-8 Greencoat Place London SW1P 1PL United Kingdom Telephone: +44(0)20 7798 5000 Fax: +44(0)20 7798 5001 LONDON BOROUGH OF HAMMERSMITH AND FULHAM UPDATED SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 47065080 April 2015 i Limitations Please note that, as of October 2014, AECOM and URS have joined together as one company. Whilst AECOM and URS have become one company, contracting entities (all of which are now wholly owned by AECOM) and lines of communication currently remain the same unless specifically agreed or communicated otherwise. Capita and URS Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited (“Capita URS”) has prepared this Report for the sole use of the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea and the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham (“Client”) in accordance with the Agreement under which our services were performed (September 2012). No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice included in this Report or any other services provided by URS. This Report is confidential and may not be disclosed by the Client nor relied upon by any other party without the prior and express written agreement of URS. The conclusions and recommendations contained in this Report are based upon information provided by others and upon the assumption that all relevant information has been provided by those parties from whom it has been requested and that such information is accurate. Information obtained by URS has not been independently verified by URS, unless otherwise stated in the Report. The methodology adopted and the sources of information used by URS in providing its services are outlined in this Report. The work described in this Report was undertaken between December 2012 and April 2015 and is based on the conditions encountered and the information available during the said period of time. The scope of this Report and the services are accordingly factually limited by these circumstances. Where assessments of works or costs identified in this Report are made, such assessments are based upon the information available at the time and where appropriate are subject to further investigations or information which may become available. URS disclaim any undertaking or obligation to advise any person of any change in any matter affecting the Report, which may come or be brought to URS’ attention after the date of the Report. Certain statements made in the Report that are not historical facts may constitute estimates, projections or other forward- looking statements and even though they are based on reasonable assumptions as of the date of the Report, such forward-looking statements by their nature involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results predicted. URS specifically does not guarantee or warrant any estimate or projections contained in this Report. LONDON BOROUGH OF HAMMERSMITH AND FULHAM UPDATED SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 47065080 April 2015 ii Executive Summary EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This document forms the updated Surface Water Management Plan (SWMP) for the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham (LBHF). This document is a plan which outlines the preferred surface water management strategy for the Borough including consideration of flooding from sewers, drains, groundwater, and runoff from land, small watercourses and ditches that occurs as a result of heavy rainfall. The SWMP builds upon previous work undertaken at part of the Drain London Tier 1 and Tier 2 packages of work and has been undertaken following a four phase approach (as outlined in the Defra SWMP Technical Guidance, March 2010); Phase 1 – Preparation; Phase 2 – Risk Assessment; Phase 3 – Options; and Phase 4 – Implementation and Review. Phase 1 Preparation Phase 1 builds upon work formerly undertaken during Tier 1 and Tier 2 of the Drain London Project to collect and review surface water flood risk data from key stakeholders and build partnerships between stakeholders responsible for local flood risk management. Phase 2 Risk Assessment As part of Phase 2 Risk Assessment, direct rainfall modelling has been undertaken across the entire Borough for eight specified return periods. The results of this modelling have been used to identify flooding hotspots where flooding affects houses, businesses and/or infrastructure. The methodology for defining flooding hotspots specifically in LBHF is defined in Section 3.3. In order to enable a more focused assessment of the surface water flood risk across the Borough, analysis of the modelling results and the number of properties at risk has been undertaken based on the 16 wards within the Borough, as identified in Figure 1. Figure 1 – Maximum surface water flood depth (1% AEP) and ward boundaries The chief mechanisms for flooding in the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham (LBHF) can be broadly divided into the following categories: Runoff from higher topography - The areas of greatest flood depths tend to be at the base of the steeper land to the north of the Borough. Localised surface water runoff – Within the central and southern parts of the borough, surface water flooding tends to be a result of localised ponding of surface water. Sewer Flooding – areas where extensive and deep surface water flooding is likely to be influenced by sewer flooding. Where the sewer network has reached capacity and surcharged, this will exacerbate the flood risk in these areas. Low Lying Areas - areas such as underpasses, subways and lowered roads beneath railway lines are more susceptible to surface water flooding; Railway Cuttings - four stretches of mainline railway track (in cuttings) are susceptible to surface water flooding and, if flooded, will impact services that pass across the Borough; Railway Embankments - discrete surface water flooding locations along the up-stream side of the raised network rail embankments where water flows are interrupted and ponding can occur. LONDON BOROUGH OF HAMMERSMITH AND FULHAM UPDATED SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 47065080 April 2015 i Executive Summary Analysis of the number of properties predicted to be at risk of surface water flooding has been undertaken for the rainfall event with a 1 in 100 probability of occurrence in any given year (1% Annual Exceedance Probability, AEP). A review of the results identifies that 7,059 residential properties and 889 non-residential properties in the LBHF could be at risk of surface water flooding of greater than 0.1m depth during a 1% AEP rainfall event. Of those, 845 residential properties and 64 non-residential properties could be at risk of flooding to a depth of greater than 0.5m during the same rainfall event. Table 1 provides the rank order of the Wards, based upon the number of properties at risk and the number of Council records of flooding within each Ward. Wards have been given ranked from most at risk (1) to least at risk (16). Table 1 Analysis of surface water risk across LBHF Wards (1% AEP) Ward Ward ID Rank Askew (4) 1 Hammersmith Broadway (6) 2 Addison (7) 3 Town (14) 4 Ravenscourt Park (5) 5 Shepherd’s Bush Green (3) 6 Parsons Green and Walham (15) 7 Munster (12) 8 Wormholt and White City (2) 9 North End (10) 9 Fulham Broadway (13) 11 Fulham Reach (9) 12 Sands End (16) 13 Avonmore and Brook Green (8) 14 College Park and Old Oak (1) 15 Palace Riverside (11) 16 Analysis of this information by Ward indicates that flood risk is greatest in the western central part of the borough, including Askew, Wormholt and White City, Hammersmith Broadway and Addison. There is also a notable risk further south in the Town and Parsons Green and Walham. The Council records of flooding support the findings of the surface water modelling, with significant number of records being reported in Askew, Parsons Green and Walham, Hammersmith Broadway and the Town. Flooding in Wormholt and White City and Askew is influenced by overland flows from the London Borough of Ealing. It is therefore important that the Council work in partnership to manage flood risk at a catchment level in this area. LONDON BOROUGH OF HAMMERSMITH AND FULHAM UPDATED SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 47065080 April 2015 ii Executive Summary Phase 3 Options Assessment There are a number of opportunities for flood risk management measures to be implemented across the Borough to tackle surface water flood risk. In addition, opportunities to raise community awareness of the risks and responsibilities for residents should be sought, and LBHF may wish to consider the implementation of a Communication Plan to assist with this. Throughout the Borough there are opportunities for generic measures to be implemented through the establishment of a policy position on issues including the widespread use of SuDS and water conservation measures such as water butts and rainwater harvesting technology. In addition, there are Borough-wide opportunities to raise community awareness and improve resilience to flooding. For each of the Wards, site-specific measures have been identified that could be considered to help manage surface water runoff across the Borough. Four options were shortlisted to be incorporated into the baseline modelling.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Uncovering the Underground's Role in the Formation of Modern London, 1855-1945
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Theses and Dissertations--History History 2016 Minding the Gap: Uncovering the Underground's Role in the Formation of Modern London, 1855-1945 Danielle K. Dodson University of Kentucky, [email protected] Digital Object Identifier: http://dx.doi.org/10.13023/ETD.2016.339 Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Dodson, Danielle K., "Minding the Gap: Uncovering the Underground's Role in the Formation of Modern London, 1855-1945" (2016). Theses and Dissertations--History. 40. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/history_etds/40 This Doctoral Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the History at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations--History by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STUDENT AGREEMENT: I represent that my thesis or dissertation and abstract are my original work. Proper attribution has been given to all outside sources. I understand that I am solely responsible for obtaining any needed copyright permissions. I have obtained needed written permission statement(s) from the owner(s) of each third-party copyrighted matter to be included in my work, allowing electronic distribution (if such use is not permitted by the fair use doctrine) which will be submitted to UKnowledge as Additional File. I hereby grant to The University of Kentucky and its agents the irrevocable, non-exclusive, and royalty-free license to archive and make accessible my work in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known.
    [Show full text]
  • Thames Tideway Tunnel Interim Measures to Reduce Infraction Fines
    Thames Tideway Tunnel Interim measures to reduce infraction fines. Working draft 5th February 2013 Report By Professor Chris Binnie MA, DIC, HonDEng, FREng, FICE, FCIWEM 2013 Brockwell, Wootton Courtenay, Minehead Somerset TA24 8RN Tideway tunnel interim scheme 28 8 12 1 Executive summary Any long term solution to the Thames Tideway CSO problems would take many years to implement, so I propose interim measures to much improve the Tideway within two to three years. The European Commission has taken out infraction proceedings against the UK for slow implementation of the UWWTD. The European Court of Justice has found against the UK on the Thames Tideway. Thus it is likely that infraction fines will be imposed. My information is that these could be substantial, based on the current tunnel completion date of 2023 as high as Euros 2.0 bn. I am advised that they would be based partly on the “Environmental impact of non-compliance “. A reduction of one point out of five points on the “environmental impact of non-compliance” or “member state conduct”might save as much as Euro 200 million, about £160m. Standards for ecology, aesthetics, and health impact have been set for the Tideway. The current STW improvements, and the Lee Tunnel would reduce the spill volume from 39Mm3/year to about 18Mm3/years, a long way to achieving the dissolved oxygen standards. However the Thames Tideway Tunnel will not be operational until about 2023. Thus interim measures could be implemented to reduce “the environmental impact of non-compliance” until the tunnel is operational. The object of these interim measures would not be to meet the standards set for the Tideway but to mitigate the environmental impact to the extent that the substantial fines would be reduced.
    [Show full text]
  • The Year's Music
    This is a reproduction of a library book that was digitized by Google as part of an ongoing effort to preserve the information in books and make it universally accessible. https://books.google.com fti E Y LAKS MV5IC 1896 juu> S-q. SV- THE YEAR'S MUSIC. PIANOS FOR HIRE Cramer FOR HARVARD COLLEGE LIBRARY Pianos BY All THE BEQUEST OF EVERT JANSEN WENDELL (CLASS OF 1882) OF NEW YORK Makers. 1918 THIS^BQQKJS FOR USE 1 WITHIN THE LIBRARY ONLY 207 & 209, REGENT STREET, REST, E.C. A D VERTISEMENTS. A NOVEL PROGRAMME for a BALLAD CONCERT, OR A Complete Oratorio, Opera Recital, Opera and Operetta in Costume, and Ballad Concert Party. MADAME FANNY MOODY AND MR. CHARLES MANNERS, Prima Donna Soprano and Principal Bass of Royal Italian Opera, Covent Garden, London ; also of 5UI the principal ©ratorio, dJrtlustra, artii Sgmphoiu) Cxmctria of ©wat Jfvitain, Jtmmca anb Canaba, With their Full Party, comprising altogether Five Vocalists and Three Instrumentalists, Are now Booking Engagements for the Coming Season. Suggested Programme for Ballad and Opera (in Costume) Concert. Part I. could consist of Ballads, Scenas, Duets, Violin Solos, &c. Lasting for about an hour and a quarter. Part II. Opera or Operetta in Costume. To play an hour or an hour and a half. Suggested Programme for a Choral Society. Part I. A Small Oratorio work with Chorus. Part II. An Operetta in Costume; or the whole party can be engaged for a whole work (Oratorio or Opera), or Opera in Costume, or Recital. REPERTOIRE. Faust (Gounod), Philemon and Baucis {Gounod) (by arrangement with Sir Augustus Harris), Maritana (Wallace), Bohemian Girl (Balfe), and most of the usual Oratorios, &c.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Right Assertion a Thesis Submitted to Middlesex University In
    Enclosure Resistance in Middlesex, 1656 - 1889: A Study of Common Right Assertion A thesis submitted to Middlesex University in partial fulfilment of the requirementsfor the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Paul Carter School of Humanities and Cultural Studies August 1998 BEST COPY AVAILABLE Variable print quality I ABSTRACT This study provides a detailed examination of resistance to enclosure in Middlesex from the closing stagesof the English Republic to the late Victorian period. The evidence presentedin the following chapters establishesthat resistancewas widely spread both over time, (before, during and after any individual enclosure) and geographical location within the county. The study itself is divided into four general sections. The first section is divided into two chapters each having a separatefunction in setting the sceneprior to examining any of the Middlesex evidence. The first chaptersets out both the terminologyused by contemporariesand later by historiansto describe farming practice in general and the enclosure process in particular. Contemporaries, whether agriculturists or commentators on rural life, and historians have a myriad of terms and conventions to explain the way in which life was organised in the countryside of the past. This introduction to the terminology is necessary. Although I am primarily concerned with labour, and the transition from a rural community with access to the material benefits of common rights to one of exclusive wage dependence, it is still required that we are able to understand the description of agricultural practices as this transition progresses. The second chapter is an examination of previous historians' analysis of enclosure, and their accounts of the responsesof commoners to enclosure and the threat of enclosure.
    [Show full text]
  • The Park Keeper
    The Park Keeper 1 ‘Most of us remember the park keeper of the past. More often than not a man, uniformed, close to retirement age, and – in the mind’s eye at least – carrying a pointed stick for collecting litter. It is almost impossible to find such an individual ...over the last twenty years or so, these individuals have disappeared from our parks and in many circumstances their role has not been replaced.’ [Nick Burton1] CONTENTS training as key factors in any parks rebirth. Despite a consensus that the old-fashioned park keeper and his Overview 2 authoritarian ‘keep off the grass’ image were out of place A note on nomenclature 4 in the 21st century, the matter of his disappearance crept back constantly in discussions.The press have published The work of the park keeper 5 articles4, 5, 6 highlighting the need for safer public open Park keepers and gardening skills 6 spaces, and in particular for a rebirth of the park keeper’s role. The provision of park-keeping services 7 English Heritage, as the government’s advisor on the Uniforms 8 historic environment, has joined forces with other agencies Wages and status 9 to research the skills shortage in public parks.These efforts Staffing levels at London parks 10 have contributed to the government’s ‘Cleaner, Safer, Greener’ agenda,7 with its emphasis on tackling crime and The park keeper and the community 12 safety, vandalism and graffiti, litter, dog fouling and related issues, and on broader targets such as the enhancement of children’s access to culture and sport in our parks The demise of the park keeper 13 and green spaces.
    [Show full text]
  • Network Closures Weekend of 29/30 March
    Transport for London Network closures weekend of 29/30 March Chesham Watford Junction Epping Chalfont & Latimer Watford High Street Theydon Bois Watford High Barnet Cockfosters Debden Amersham Bushey Totteridge & Whetstone Oakwood Chorleywood Croxley Loughton Carpenders Park Rickmansworth Moor Park Woodside Park Southgate Buckhurst Hill Roding Grange Hatch End Valley Hill Northwood Mill Hill East West Finchley Arnos Grove West Ruislip Headstone Lane Edgware Chigwell Northwood Hills Stanmore Bounds Green Hillingdon Ruislip Harrow & Hainault Ruislip Manor Burnt Oak Finchley Central Pinner Wealdstone Canons Park Wood Green Woodford Uxbridge Ickenham Colindale Fairlop Eastcote North Harrow East Finchley Harringay Kenton Queensbury Turnpike Lane South Woodford Green Lanes Barkingside Harrow- Hendon Central Northwick Preston Highgate South Tottenham Snaresbrook on-the-Hill Park Road Kingsbury Rayners Lane Manor House Newbury Park Ruislip Gardens Brent Cross Blackhorse Gospel Archway Crouch Hill Seven Sisters Road West South Kenton Redbridge Harrow Golders Green Oak Hampstead Upper Holloway North Wembley Neasden Heath Tottenham Walthamstow South Ruislip South Harrow Hampstead Tufnell Park Wanstead Gants Wembley Hale Central Hill Upminster Wembley Central Park Dollis Hill Arsenal Finsbury Park Leytonstone Finchley Road Walthamstow Upminster Bridge Stonebridge Park Willesden Green & Frognal Kentish Kentish Leyton Leytonstone Town West Holloway Road Queen’s Road Midland Road High Road Northolt Sudbury Hill Belsize Park Town Hornchurch Harlesden Kilburn Kensal Brondesbury Caledonian Road Highbury & Chalk Farm Leyton Willesden Junction Rise Park West Hampstead Islington Dalston Camden Stratford Elm Park Road Kingsland International Greenford Wanstead Park Sudbury Town Brondesbury Finchley Road Camden Town Caledonian Dagenham East Kensal Green Road & Canonbury Swiss Cottage Barnsbury Homerton Dagenham Heathway Queen’s Park Kilburn South Mornington Dalston Junction Stratford High Road Hampstead St.
    [Show full text]
  • TO LET Second Floor Offices 8,400 Sq Ft (780.3 Sq M)
    23 Eyot Gardens Stamford Brook W6 9TR Second floor offices 8,400 sq ft (780.3 sq m) TO LET LOCATION STAMFORD A219 BROOK The building is prominently located on the A4 at its junction with Eyot Gardens. It is RAVENSCOURT approximately 7 minutes walk from TURNHAM PARK GREEN Stamford Brook(District Line Station) .It is A315 well situated for the nearby pubs by the 5 river – The Black Lion and The Old Ship. The 1 2 14 HAMMERSMITH Cross Keys and Carpenters Arms 3 13 4 Restaurants are also nearby in Black Lion 12 KI RD 6 NG STREET 16 A315 H Lane. King Street is a 5 minute walk, where CHISWICK HIGH 7 A sandwich shops, banks and other restaurants are available. The A4/M4 HAMMERSMITH provides access to central London and the 8 West of England. A4 A316 B A219 C 10 11 9 DIRECTORY 15 EATING & DRINKING: 1 Artisan Coffee THAMES RIVER A306 2 Tosa Japanese Restaurant 3 Azou Restaurant FULHAM 4 Michael Nandras 5 Polti Indian Restaurant 6 The Hampshire Hog 7 The Carpenters Arms PALACE R 8 The Cross Keys 9 The Black Lion Chiswick 10 The Old Ship Eyot 11 The Dove A316 OAD SUPERMARKETS & AMENITIES: 12 Sainsbury’s Local 13 Tesco Metro 14 Post Office ENTERTAINMENT: 15 The Eventim Apollo 16 Lyric Theatre LOCAL BUSINESSES: B Kelly Hoppen A Lifschutz Davidson Sandilands (Architects) Legendary (Film Company) Frost Meadowcroft (Property Consultants) C British Grove Recording Studios 2nd floor DESCR IPTION Eyot Gardens House is a four story building, the available space is situated on the second floor.
    [Show full text]
  • Moore Park Road £1,500,000
    Moore Park Road £1,500,000 T E E R T S S TON GARDEN H DRAY K L G A I W H CRESSWELL PLACE Y R NS LK Y GD RK WA O RLE PA N I HA R P O AD T O R D STON GIL TON STREET A G S LIMER O R N T I AD O N FFE R I O S L C D NS RED O M T N T THE L A A BO E L E E K D L A O W R R R T D U K O T M S A Y R R SE SHALCOMB ST E O A R D C U R H E R E T T Maisonette T ONS A TLE BOLT N IT R E L N LANGT TH C OAD ON ST R E U D 2 double bedrooms OO R W G G LY OL ETHERTON GROVE E H N 2 bathrooms O R SLAIDBURN STREET CE T D A Open plan living space TARR M OURT A E HARC E Bespoke kitchen R O A R T U Separate W.C S R C Q M S Utility area U E S I N N F E D D F R I A D Patio/garden G ROAD A O FERNSHAW L E F T LIF A S C C T D Private entranceRE O D R P E S R Gated private parking T L TADEMA M ROAD C O D L ESTGATE TER.Chelsea borders A E O W O K COLEHERNE ROAD R I GH D R Approx 1367U sq ft (127 sq m) N RO R UVERDALE RD O O B NE MEWS B R H HE D COLE IN T F D D A A R D O LD R UPCEME RD IE Y IF E L O B V A A R R O N U TETCOT R T RD O B U M R B against a slate clad feature A A H EARL’S H wall.
    [Show full text]
  • 2. Borough Transport Objectives
    Chapter Two Objectives 2. Borough Transport Objectives 2.1 Introduction This chapter sets out Hammersmith & Fulham’s Borough Transport Objectives for the period 2011 - 2014 and beyond, reflecting the timeframe of the revised MTS. The structure is as follows: • Sections 2.2 and 2.5 describe the local context firstly providing an overview of the borough characteristics and its transport geography, and then summarising the London- wide, sub-regional and local policy influences which have informed the preparation of this LIP. • Section 2.6 sets out Hammersmith & Fulham’s problems, challenges and opportunities in the context of the Mayor’s transport goals and challenges for London, and looks at the main issues which need to be addressed within the borough in order to deliver the revised MTS goals. • Finally section 2.7 sets out our Borough Transport Objectives for this LIP, which have been created by the issues identified in Sections 2.2 to 2.6. 2.2 About Hammersmith & Fulham The borough of Hammersmith & Fulham is situated on the western edge of inner London in a strategic location on the transport routes between central London and Heathrow airport. The orientation of the borough is north to south, with most major transport links, both road and rail, carrying through-traffic from east to west across the borough. Some of the busiest road junctions in London are located in the borough at Hammersmith Broadway, Shepherds Bush Green and Savoy Circus and the borough suffers disproportionately from the effects of through-traffic. North-south transport links in the borough are not as good as east-west links.
    [Show full text]
  • London and Its Main Drainage, 1847-1865: a Study of One Aspect of the Public Health Movement in Victorian England
    University of Nebraska at Omaha DigitalCommons@UNO Student Work 6-1-1971 London and its main drainage, 1847-1865: A study of one aspect of the public health movement in Victorian England Lester J. Palmquist University of Nebraska at Omaha Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/studentwork Recommended Citation Palmquist, Lester J., "London and its main drainage, 1847-1865: A study of one aspect of the public health movement in Victorian England" (1971). Student Work. 395. https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/studentwork/395 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UNO. It has been accepted for inclusion in Student Work by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LONDON .ML' ITS MAIN DRAINAGE, 1847-1865: A STUDY OF ONE ASPECT OP TEE PUBLIC HEALTH MOVEMENT IN VICTORIAN ENGLAND A Thesis Presented to the Department of History and the Faculty of the Graduate College University of Nebraska at Omaha In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts by Lester J. Palmquist June 1971 UMI Number: EP73033 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI EP73033 Published by ProQuest LLC (2015). Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC.
    [Show full text]
  • Buses from Sherpherd's Bush
    UXBRIDGE HARLESDEN WILLESDEN CRICKLEWOOD HAYES LADBROKE GROVE EAST ACTON EALING ACTON TURNHAM GREEN Buses from Shepherd’s Bush HOUNSLOW BARNES 607 N207 Isleworth Brentford Gunnersbury Uxbridge UXBRIDGE Busch Corner Half Acre 316 Key Uxbridge Civic Centre Uxbridge Park Road Cricklewood 49 Day buses in black Bus Garage WILLESDEN CRICKLEWOOD N207 Night buses in blue HARLESDEN O Connections with London Underground Hillingdon Road The Greenway Harlesden Willesden Cricklewood — Central Middlesex Hospital Jubilee Clock Bus Garage Broadway ChildÕs Hill o Connections with London Overground 260 Hillingdon Lees Road HAYES Craven Park Willesden Cricklewood Golders R Connections with National Rail 228 Harlesden Green Kilburn Green B Connections with river boats South College Park Hayes End M Greenford South Early mornings and evenings only Willesden Junction Brondesbury Perivale Hampstead Chalk Farm G Daytimes only when Wetlands Centre is open Uxbridge 24 hour 31 24 hour 220 service County Court Greenford Park Royal 72 service 283 Swiss Cottage Camden Town L Not served weekday morning and evening peak hours Red Lion Hanger East Acton Lane ASDA Kilburn or Saturday shopping hours ROEHAMPTON Hayes Grapes Industrial Estate Scrubs Lane High Road DormerÕs Mitre Bridge N Limited stop Wells Lane Southall Ruislip Kilburn Park Trinity Road Lady Margaret Park Road s Road Royal Old Oak Common Lane QueenÕs Park The Fairway LADBROKE 95 Scrubs Lane 207 Southall Town Hall North Acton Mitre Way/Wormwood Scrubs 228 Southall Gypsy Corner GROVE Chippenham Road Police
    [Show full text]
  • Helicopter Noise in London – Written Evidence
    Helicopter Noise in London – Written Evidence Index Page Ref No. Person / Organisation Page HN/001 Royal borough of Kensington & Chelsea 1 HN/002 Greenwich Society 1 HN/003 Isle of Dogs Resident - Mrs Rosemary Houlston 2 HN/004 HACAN ClearSkies 2 - 4 HN/005 UK Noise Association 5 - 6 HN/006 Greenwich Resident - Kenneth May 7 – 9 HN/007 Enfield Council 9 HN/008 Imperial Wharf (East) Residents’ Association 10 – 12 HN/009 London Borough of Hackney 13 HN/010 London Borough of Brent 14 HN/011 London Borough of Hillingdon 14 - 15 HN/012 British Helicopter Advisory Board 15 – 18 HN/013 Metropolitan Police Service Air Support Unit 19 HN/014 The Advertising Agency 20 – 23 HN/015 London Borough of Croydon 23 HN/016 DEFRA 23 HN/017 London Borough of Ealing - Liza Ctori 24 HN/018 London Borough of Hounslow 24 – 25 HN/019 Wild and Wetland Trust – London Wetland Centre 25 HN/020 Royal Aeronautical Society 25 – 27 HN/021 Principal Policy Officer – Noise, Greater London Authority 27 - 28 HN/022 Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea – Rebecca Brown 28 – 29 HN/023 Weston Aviation Limited 30 – 31 HN/024 London Borough of Lewisham 31 HN/025 National Air Traffic Services 32 – 33 HN/026 Westminster City Council 33 – 38 HN/027 Blackheath Society 39 – 40 HN/028 Southwark Resident – Pauline Bennington 40 – 41 HN/029 London Borough of Wandsworth 41- 44 HN/030 Holborn Resident – Michael Southwell 44 HN/031 British Aviation Authority 44 – 45 HN/032 Soho Resident - Phillipa Suarez 45 HN/033 Big Issue Seller, Bow Street – Alex Albion 46 HN/034 Flying TV Ltd 47 Ref No Person / Organisation Page HN/035 Southwark Resident – Guy Mannes Abbott 48 HN/036 Battersea Resident – Jonathan Harris 48 – 49 HN/037 Harmondsworth and Sipson Residents Association 50 HN/038 Hampstead Resident – Simon Norton 51 HN/039 London City Airport 52 – 53 HN/040 Fulham Resident – Richard Hale 53 HN/041 WC2 Residents - Margaret & David Chandler 54 HN/042 Hither Green Resident – P.
    [Show full text]