DOCSLIB.ORG

Common Right Assertion a Thesis Submitted to Middlesex University In

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Common Right Assertion a Thesis Submitted to Middlesex University In Enclosure Resistance in Middlesex, 1656 - 1889: A Study of Common Right Assertion A thesis submitted to Middlesex University in partial fulfilment of the requirementsfor the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Paul Carter School of Humanities and Cultural Studies August 1998 BEST COPY AVAILABLE Variable print quality I ABSTRACT This study provides a detailed examination of resistance to enclosure in Middlesex from the closing stagesof the English Republic to the late Victorian period. The evidence presentedin the following chapters establishesthat resistancewas widely spread both over time, (before, during and after any individual enclosure) and geographical location within the county. The study itself is divided into four general sections. The first section is divided into two chapters each having a separatefunction in setting the sceneprior to examining any of the Middlesex evidence. The first chaptersets out both the terminologyused by contemporariesand later by historiansto describe farming practice in general and the enclosure process in particular. Contemporaries, whether agriculturists or commentators on rural life, and historians have a myriad of terms and conventions to explain the way in which life was organised in the countryside of the past. This introduction to the terminology is necessary. Although I am primarily concerned with labour, and the transition from a rural community with access to the material benefits of common rights to one of exclusive wage dependence, it is still required that we are able to understand the description of agricultural practices as this transition progresses. The second chapter is an examination of previous historians' analysis of enclosure, and their accounts of the responsesof commoners to enclosure and the threat of enclosure. The part played by this chapter is to summarisethe historical record regarding the commoner as an active player in history or a passive casualty of capitalist improvement. The second section concentrates on the Middlesex rural experience. This is divided into three dealing chapters each with a specific aspect of rural life and work, and acts as a background for 2 the later examination of enclosure resistance. The first of these chapters establishes the agricultural setting of Middlesex throughout the period and assessesthe landholding patterns within the county. The second examines how common rights operated locally from parish to parish and from manor to manor. The third chapter shows the use of rights of common in the community and what value was placed on those rights by the commoners themselves. This chapter also surveys the county in order to establish geographically how widespread common rights were in Middlesex. The three following chapters make up the third section and respectively examine the evidence for for is enclosure resistancebetween 1656 - 1765; 1766 - 1825 and 1826 - 1889. The reason this that each period represents a different era of enclosure. The first era is that of the pre-parliamentary period from 1656 up until 1765. By 'pre-parliamentary' I am referring to local experience. In the sixteenth century the Crown initiated a largely unsuccessful act for the enclosure of Hounslow Heath and this is further discussedin chapter seven. However it was not until 1766 that Middlesex landlords began to use parliament to enclosure their Middlesex estates. Enclosure by personal coercion was a popular device of Middlesex landlords in the seventeenth and eighteenth century and one which they were well prepared to use. Enclosure by act of parliament did not of course remove the coercive element in restricting or extinguishing common rights, however the process was different as was the role of the state; thus the period from 1766 to 1825 has a chapter to itself. This period ends with the 1825 enclosure act for Northolt; the last parliamentary enclosure act for the county. The third chapter deals with the period 1826 to 1889. This final period saw no further individual acts of enclosure although the common fields of several 3 parishes were enclosed under the general enclosure acts of 1836 and 1845, and other commons were enclosed through purchase. Although by this time common rights were severely diminished people were neverthelesswilling to fight to keep those rights which had been retained, as well as expressingtheir dissatisfaction at the loss of previous common rights. The fourth and final section is divided into two chapters. The first examineshow the way of life of the commoners was criminalised as the ruling class looked to enclosure as a means of extending their control into every aspect of the lives of those around, (or rather below) them. The purpose of this chapter is to examine how the physical commonfields and commons, and the ideas of common use right and access, interfered with the ability of the local ruling class and their representatives to control the English people. It charts how ideas of crime and anti-social behaviour were attached to the existence of commonlands and how the eradication of the latter lead would to the control of the former. The second chapter of this section examinesthe evidence in relation to the Marxist interpretation of class struggle and expropriation of the rural peasant. It is also within this chapter that I relate those struggles to the conclusions of earlier historians who have investigated the activity or passivity of the commoners to enclosure. Finally I argue that this struggle was vitally important to class formation, and establishesrural struggles as central to an understanding of class and class consciousnessin England during its time as an emerging and maturing capitalist economy. Such conclusions concur with the Marxist view regarding the social and economic condition of commoners and the position of the rural proletariat after enclosure. 4 CONTENTS Abstract I ........................................................................................................................ Contents Lists Appendices, Tables, Maps Illustrations 4 and of and .................................. Abbreviations 7 ........ ......................................................................................................... Preface 9 .................. ........................................................................................................ PART ONE CHAPTER 1. Enclosure: Terminology Conventions 20 and ....................................................... 2. Resistanceto debate 31 enclosure ......................................................................... PART TWO 3. Middlesex: The 51 rural setting...................................................................... 4. The 70 nature of common rights .................................................. 5. Practical 79 use and values ......................................................... PART THREE 6. Enclosure 1656 1765: The 88 resistance - pre parliamentary ....... period 103 7. Enclosure resistance 1766 - 1825: The parliamentary period... 128 8. Enclosure resistance1826 - 1889: Common remnants............ PART FOUR 9. Crime the 152 and commons ....................................................... Enclosure, formation 171 10. property and class ............................... 5 Appendices Chronology of parliamentary in Middlesex 1769-1862 234 enclosure ....... giving cumulative acreage enclosed 2. Petitions to bring in bills, 236 anti enclosure petitions, presentment of ..... bills, royal assent etc. Middlesex details from the house of Commons Journals 1766-1825 3. Thomas Gream's Hanwell: Middlesex 1803 245 survey of ........................ 4. John Claridge's Northolt: Middlesex 1806 246 survey of .......................... 5. Opening to'Association for Opposing the 249 page .................................. Barrow Inclosure c. 1802 6. Copy from tray the failed 250 a produced to commemorate attempt .......... at enclosure at Bedfont, 1801 7 Preamble to the Teddington Enclosure Bill: 1813 251 .............................. George Cruikshank's 'London Going Out Town The 252 8 of - or - ............. March of Bricks and Mortar', 1829 9. Poster: 'Public Meeting West London Central Anti 253 of the ................... Enclosure Association', 1847 10 'Britons to Arms', 1816 254 ...................................................................... Middlesex Population Figures 1801,1811,1821,1841 1881 255 and ....... 12. Middlesex Occupational Census 1801 (selected 260 parishes) ................... 13. Middlesex Occupational Census 1801 (by hundreds divisions) 263 and ..... 14 Middlesex Occupational Census 1831 (selected 264 parishes) ................... 6 15. Middlesex Occupational Census 1831 (by hundreds divisions) 268 and ..... Bibliography Note on 269 manuscript sources ................................................................ Manuscript 271 sources ............................................................................ Contemporary 279 periodicals, newspapersand publications of ................ criminal proceedings. Parliamentary 279 reports and papers ....................................................... Contemporary 281 published sources ........................................................ General 284 secondaryworks .................................................................... Local 296 secondaryworks ....................................................................... Tables in Text 1. Middlesex data. (Promotion 106 enclosure petitions/counter-petitions and ......... enclosure acts) 2. Nottingham data: 108
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Year's Music
    This is a reproduction of a library book that was digitized by Google as part of an ongoing effort to preserve the information in books and make it universally accessible. https://books.google.com fti E Y LAKS MV5IC 1896 juu> S-q. SV- THE YEAR'S MUSIC. PIANOS FOR HIRE Cramer FOR HARVARD COLLEGE LIBRARY Pianos BY All THE BEQUEST OF EVERT JANSEN WENDELL (CLASS OF 1882) OF NEW YORK Makers. 1918 THIS^BQQKJS FOR USE 1 WITHIN THE LIBRARY ONLY 207 & 209, REGENT STREET, REST, E.C. A D VERTISEMENTS. A NOVEL PROGRAMME for a BALLAD CONCERT, OR A Complete Oratorio, Opera Recital, Opera and Operetta in Costume, and Ballad Concert Party. MADAME FANNY MOODY AND MR. CHARLES MANNERS, Prima Donna Soprano and Principal Bass of Royal Italian Opera, Covent Garden, London ; also of 5UI the principal ©ratorio, dJrtlustra, artii Sgmphoiu) Cxmctria of ©wat Jfvitain, Jtmmca anb Canaba, With their Full Party, comprising altogether Five Vocalists and Three Instrumentalists, Are now Booking Engagements for the Coming Season. Suggested Programme for Ballad and Opera (in Costume) Concert. Part I. could consist of Ballads, Scenas, Duets, Violin Solos, &c. Lasting for about an hour and a quarter. Part II. Opera or Operetta in Costume. To play an hour or an hour and a half. Suggested Programme for a Choral Society. Part I. A Small Oratorio work with Chorus. Part II. An Operetta in Costume; or the whole party can be engaged for a whole work (Oratorio or Opera), or Opera in Costume, or Recital. REPERTOIRE. Faust (Gounod), Philemon and Baucis {Gounod) (by arrangement with Sir Augustus Harris), Maritana (Wallace), Bohemian Girl (Balfe), and most of the usual Oratorios, &c.
    [Show full text]
  • HNL Appraisal Package 2 Pinn and Cannon Brook Initial Assessment Plus Document
    FINAL HNL Appraisal Package 2 Pinn and Cannon Brook Initial Assessment Plus Document The Environment Agency March 2018 HNL Appraisal Package 2 Pinn and Cannon Brook IA plus document Quality information Prepared by Checked by Approved by Andy Mkandla Steve Edwards Fay Bull Engineer, Water Associate Director, Water Regional Director, Water Laura Irvine Graduate Engineer, Water Stacey Johnson Graduate Engineer, Water Revision History Revision Revision date Details Authorized Name Position Distribution List # Hard Copies PDF Required Association / Company Name Prepared for: The Environment Agency AECOM HNL Appraisal Package 2 Pinn and Cannon Brook IA plus document Prepared for: The Environment Agency Prepared by: Andy Mkandla Engineer E: [email protected] AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited Royal Court Basil Close Derbyshire Chesterfield S41 7SL UK T: +44 (1246) 209221 aecom.com © 2018 AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited (“AECOM”) for sole use of our client (the “Client”) in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. No third party may rely upon this document without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM. Prepared for: The Environment Agency AECOM HNL
    [Show full text]
  • The Park Keeper
    The Park Keeper 1 ‘Most of us remember the park keeper of the past. More often than not a man, uniformed, close to retirement age, and – in the mind’s eye at least – carrying a pointed stick for collecting litter. It is almost impossible to find such an individual ...over the last twenty years or so, these individuals have disappeared from our parks and in many circumstances their role has not been replaced.’ [Nick Burton1] CONTENTS training as key factors in any parks rebirth. Despite a consensus that the old-fashioned park keeper and his Overview 2 authoritarian ‘keep off the grass’ image were out of place A note on nomenclature 4 in the 21st century, the matter of his disappearance crept back constantly in discussions.The press have published The work of the park keeper 5 articles4, 5, 6 highlighting the need for safer public open Park keepers and gardening skills 6 spaces, and in particular for a rebirth of the park keeper’s role. The provision of park-keeping services 7 English Heritage, as the government’s advisor on the Uniforms 8 historic environment, has joined forces with other agencies Wages and status 9 to research the skills shortage in public parks.These efforts Staffing levels at London parks 10 have contributed to the government’s ‘Cleaner, Safer, Greener’ agenda,7 with its emphasis on tackling crime and The park keeper and the community 12 safety, vandalism and graffiti, litter, dog fouling and related issues, and on broader targets such as the enhancement of children’s access to culture and sport in our parks The demise of the park keeper 13 and green spaces.
    [Show full text]
  • Moore Park Road £1,500,000
    Moore Park Road £1,500,000 T E E R T S S TON GARDEN H DRAY K L G A I W H CRESSWELL PLACE Y R NS LK Y GD RK WA O RLE PA N I HA R P O AD T O R D STON GIL TON STREET A G S LIMER O R N T I AD O N FFE R I O S L C D NS RED O M T N T THE L A A BO E L E E K D L A O W R R R T D U K O T M S A Y R R SE SHALCOMB ST E O A R D C U R H E R E T T Maisonette T ONS A TLE BOLT N IT R E L N LANGT TH C OAD ON ST R E U D 2 double bedrooms OO R W G G LY OL ETHERTON GROVE E H N 2 bathrooms O R SLAIDBURN STREET CE T D A Open plan living space TARR M OURT A E HARC E Bespoke kitchen R O A R T U Separate W.C S R C Q M S Utility area U E S I N N F E D D F R I A D Patio/garden G ROAD A O FERNSHAW L E F T LIF A S C C T D Private entranceRE O D R P E S R Gated private parking T L TADEMA M ROAD C O D L ESTGATE TER.Chelsea borders A E O W O K COLEHERNE ROAD R I GH D R Approx 1367U sq ft (127 sq m) N RO R UVERDALE RD O O B NE MEWS B R H HE D COLE IN T F D D A A R D O LD R UPCEME RD IE Y IF E L O B V A A R R O N U TETCOT R T RD O B U M R B against a slate clad feature A A H EARL’S H wall.
    [Show full text]
  • LONDON BOROUGH of HAMMERSMITH and FULHAM UPDATED SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 47065080 April 2015 I
    London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham Updated Surface Water Management Plan April 2015 UNITED KINGDOM & IRELAND Prepared for: 47065080 REVISION SCHEDULE Rev Date Details Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by 1 December Draft for client comment Danielle Skilton Emily Craven Jon Robinson 2013 Flood Risk Principal Operations Consultant Consultant Director 2 January Final Draft Danielle Skilton Emily Craven Jon Robinson 2014 Flood Risk Principal Operations Consultant Consultant Director 3 May 2014 Final Danielle Skilton Emily Craven Jon Robinson Flood Risk Principal Operations Consultant Consultant Director 4 June 2014 Final Revision Danielle Skilton Jon Robinson Jon Robinson Flood Risk Operations Operations Consultant Director Director 5 April 2015 Updated with revised Sarah Littlewood Matthew Ince Michael Timmins modelling for client comment Consultant Principal Flood Technical Director Risk Consultant URS Infrastructure & Environment UK Ltd. 6-8 Greencoat Place London SW1P 1PL United Kingdom Telephone: +44(0)20 7798 5000 Fax: +44(0)20 7798 5001 LONDON BOROUGH OF HAMMERSMITH AND FULHAM UPDATED SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 47065080 April 2015 i Limitations Please note that, as of October 2014, AECOM and URS have joined together as one company. Whilst AECOM and URS have become one company, contracting entities (all of which are now wholly owned by AECOM) and lines of communication currently remain the same unless specifically agreed or communicated otherwise. Capita and URS Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited (“Capita URS”) has prepared this Report for the sole use of the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea and the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham (“Client”) in accordance with the Agreement under which our services were performed (September 2012).
    [Show full text]
  • Ickenham HCA FINAL 2018
    Ickenham Heritage and Character Assessment November 2018 Ickenham Heritage and Character Assessment Quality information Prepared by Checked by Approved by Sam Griffiths Richard Hammond Mary Kucharska Landscape Architect, AECOM Associate Landscape Architect, Senior Consultant, AECOM AECOM Joe Critchley Built Heritage Consultant, AECOM Revision History Revision Revision date Details Name Position A 03/10/18 Incorporation of Sam Griffiths Landscape Architect Ickenham Neighbourhood Group Comments B 15/11/18 Incorporation of Sam Griffiths Landscape Architect Locality’s comments Prepared for: Locality AECOM 2 Ickenham Heritage and Character Assessment Prepared for: Ickenham Neighbourhood Forum Prepared by: AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited 36 Storey's Way Cambridgeshire Cambridge CB3 0DT UK T: +44 1223 488 000 aecom.com © 2018 AECOM Limited. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by AECOM Limited (“AECOM”) in accordance with its contract with Locality (the “Client”) and in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. AECOM shall have no liability to any third party that makes use of or relies upon this document Prepared for: Locality AECOM 3 Ickenham Heritage and Character Assessment Table of Contents 1. Introduction ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Annex
    Crane Valley Partnership Strategy for the Crane Catchment 2018-2028 TECHNICAL ANNEX Final report, 9th March 2018 StrategyStrategy for for the the Crane Crane Valley Catchment, 2018-2028 2018-2028 Technical Annex Technical Annex This is the second part of the Strategy, prepared to guide the work of the Crane Valley Partnership over the period 2018-2028. It contains background material generated or collected during the preparation of the Strategy Contents Action tables for influencing and engaging to deliver the Strategy 1 Matrix of natural capital assets and ecosystem services 7 What’s important and why? - An assessment of the Crane 8 Valley’s natural capital assets Long list of projects identified in the ALGG Area Framework (No. 26 10) for the Crane Valley Agenda for the workshop held with Partners, 3rd October 2017 37 Summary of potential future governance models 39 Strategy prepared by Robert Deane and Louise Tricklebank of Rural Focus (UK) Ltd. Registered in England and Wales No. 9533053. www.rural-focus.co.uk Action tables for influencing and engaging to deliver the Strategy In order to achieve the priorities set out in Sections 6 to 8 of the main strategy report, the Partnership will need to engage with others, link in to existing policy, take advantage of funding opportunities and in-kind contributions and influence future decision making. The following tables provide a summary of the key organisations that the Partnership should prioritise working with. Thinking Spatially (Section 6 of the Strategy) Developers Engage with and influence developers to protect Funding opportunities are often available as part and enhance the central spine and look at of development proposals to deliver mutually opportunities to deliver elements of the All beneficial enhancements.
    [Show full text]
  • Helicopter Noise in London – Written Evidence
    Helicopter Noise in London – Written Evidence Index Page Ref No. Person / Organisation Page HN/001 Royal borough of Kensington & Chelsea 1 HN/002 Greenwich Society 1 HN/003 Isle of Dogs Resident - Mrs Rosemary Houlston 2 HN/004 HACAN ClearSkies 2 - 4 HN/005 UK Noise Association 5 - 6 HN/006 Greenwich Resident - Kenneth May 7 – 9 HN/007 Enfield Council 9 HN/008 Imperial Wharf (East) Residents’ Association 10 – 12 HN/009 London Borough of Hackney 13 HN/010 London Borough of Brent 14 HN/011 London Borough of Hillingdon 14 - 15 HN/012 British Helicopter Advisory Board 15 – 18 HN/013 Metropolitan Police Service Air Support Unit 19 HN/014 The Advertising Agency 20 – 23 HN/015 London Borough of Croydon 23 HN/016 DEFRA 23 HN/017 London Borough of Ealing - Liza Ctori 24 HN/018 London Borough of Hounslow 24 – 25 HN/019 Wild and Wetland Trust – London Wetland Centre 25 HN/020 Royal Aeronautical Society 25 – 27 HN/021 Principal Policy Officer – Noise, Greater London Authority 27 - 28 HN/022 Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea – Rebecca Brown 28 – 29 HN/023 Weston Aviation Limited 30 – 31 HN/024 London Borough of Lewisham 31 HN/025 National Air Traffic Services 32 – 33 HN/026 Westminster City Council 33 – 38 HN/027 Blackheath Society 39 – 40 HN/028 Southwark Resident – Pauline Bennington 40 – 41 HN/029 London Borough of Wandsworth 41- 44 HN/030 Holborn Resident – Michael Southwell 44 HN/031 British Aviation Authority 44 – 45 HN/032 Soho Resident - Phillipa Suarez 45 HN/033 Big Issue Seller, Bow Street – Alex Albion 46 HN/034 Flying TV Ltd 47 Ref No Person / Organisation Page HN/035 Southwark Resident – Guy Mannes Abbott 48 HN/036 Battersea Resident – Jonathan Harris 48 – 49 HN/037 Harmondsworth and Sipson Residents Association 50 HN/038 Hampstead Resident – Simon Norton 51 HN/039 London City Airport 52 – 53 HN/040 Fulham Resident – Richard Hale 53 HN/041 WC2 Residents - Margaret & David Chandler 54 HN/042 Hither Green Resident – P.
    [Show full text]
  • Note Book on the Parks, Gardens, Recreation Grounds, and Open
    ou c i f Jonbon gour d! g n . —0 N O T E BO O K O N T H E PARK GARDEN S, S, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE GROUNDS, S D N OF LON O . under the direction o L ieutmnt-C olonel S aab f y, C hief Oficor of the P arks D epartment . JA N U A R Y , 1 902. !T HI R D E mu ox .) m“. and S on Print ers S ufiolk Lane Jan. T ra , , , P R E F A C E . T h e P arks C ommittee h aving considered it desirable to pro vide in a c onci se formfor t h e info rmation of mm rs nd art ic ulars of , e be a oth ers, p t h e various ar s ardens recreation rounds and t h er o en s ac es p k , g , g , o p p under t h eir control a eneral d s ri ti n is h i v of h of suc h , g e c p o ere g en eac l l d p ac es. I t h as a so been eemed desirable to devot e spec ial ch apters t o t h e following subjcots Hoc key 58 Hurli ng 58 Lac rosse 58 Lawn-tennis 58 Q uoits 59 By-laws S h int y 59 i l S atin 59 C h aracterist cs, genera k g C it y C o rporation parks T ambourello 60 L d Pon 5 1 C onvenienc es .
    [Show full text]
  • Ickenham Park ICKENHAM
    Ickenham park ICKENHAM A LUXURY DEVELOPMENT OF 4 & 5 BEDROOM HOMES AND 2 BEDROOM Apartments Computer Generated Image – The Biltmore we care about the things you care about Positioning of property is Generous windows designed Crafted staircases to carefully considered to to maximise daylight in the enhance your hallway. maximise appeal. living areas Ickenham Park brings a welcoming sense of village life to a convenient urban setting. Nestling on the edge of Ickenham village in mature surroundings, this exciting new ICKENHAM PARK. CALA development ranges from spacious five everything you bedroom detached homes and four bedroom mews and townhouses, to luxury two bedroom look for in a home. apartments. Contemporary interiors are designed and a few features to offer light and space everywhere, with CALA’s you’d never expect. high specification and careful attention to detail in evidence throughout. Offering commuters excellent Local photography road, underground and rail links to London, SIMON COLLINS, cala PLANNING & DESIGN DIRECTOR Ickenham Park is clearly an idyllic urban village brimming with family life. Computer Generated Image - The Bellemeade The exterior of our homes are Sitting rooms/dining Bathrooms with gleaming all carefully designed to compliment areas designed with an white sanitaryware. the existing mature landscape accent on space and light. we care about the things you care about Sitting rooms and dining areas are Generous windows provide daylight designed with an accent on modern to the main living areas. family living. WE HAVE AN EYE FOR designed with gleaming white sanitaryware, while family spaces are eminently flexible and bedrooms are generously proportioned. From stylish yet unobtrusive interiors to EVERY LAST DETAIL.
    [Show full text]
  • Cemetery Eel Brook Common
    TAMWORTH ST ROAD HILDYARD RD ROAD Cemetery CATHCART RD ROAD R O A D PARK MICKLETHWAITE FAWCETT ST PL CRESCENT REDCLIFFE ROAD BROMPTON FARM FERNSHAW SLAIDBURN ST RD GUNTER ST MARKS LANE GROVE EDITH HORTENSIA GROVE BILLING RD EDITH TER GROVE RD WALHAMEXETER LANE Chelsea PL Football BILLING FARM BILLING RD Ground STREET Fulham PLACE R O A D THORNDIKE WANSDOWN CL Broadway PLACE HILARY CL PL TETCOTT FULHAM ROAD F U TADEMA BROADWAY L H A M HOLMEAD RDWANDON RD R O A D UVERDALE ROBERTS WATERFORD LORD BRITANNIA WALHAM GREEN BARCLAY UPCERNE MS ARGON MAX RUMBOLD RD LOTS ROAD REWELL TETCOTT HARWOOD CEDARNECOURT RD MS WELL SAND- RD FORD ST EFFIE ST EFFIECLOSE DAN PARK LENO RD WK HARWOOD BURNABY MEWS RD PLACE MOORE GRAN- CAMBRIAMAYNARD CL ROAD MUSG VILLE BURFORD WK ROAD ROAD CLOSE ROAD PLACE ST CLARE GWYN MWS ROAD WAY PL RD SOTHERON R National Rail AVE BRITANNIA KEMPSONRD K I NED G ' S ROAD ITH ROW Chelsea MICHAEL BLAKE GDS Eel CRES SANDS END LANE Brook TYRAWLEYRD CHELSEA TER AVALON RD BAGLEY'S ERIAL Common IMP SQ ST FAV HARWOOD CHERYLS HARBOUR RD ART PETER- CAMPANA BOROUGH EMDENST RD ROAD WANDSWORTH VILLAS CLOSE PARTHENIA IMPERIAL CL MELDON FORDRD CRES KEY ACFOLD LANE ELTHIRON RD ST Imperial BASUTO FUL- RD ROAD PLA ROAD RCH RD MEAD RD ST Wharf IRENE CE Road Closed CHU MALTINGS KEN MALTINGS PL ROAD Access only INGDON BAG PERRYM RD STO BOV RD RD BRIDGE PEA- LEY'S Physical Barrier RYECROFT R O A D BOWERDEAN ST RSCROFT EAD MOLES- CRONDACE CHIPS ST COURT DELVINO Emergency Barrier FORD SANDILANDS THE QUARRENDON TEAD PEARSCROFT STEPHENDALE LANE Coach Parking ST STREET ROAD ELBE CHID No left turn ROAD STREET BROUGHTON MARINEFIELD ELSWICK K I N G ' S RD APPROACH GILSTEAD STREET DINGSTONE No right turn BRADBOURNE BROU TYNEMOUTH ST STREET RD HAMMERSMITH & FULHAM PROJECT GHTON NOTES Date Rev Init COUNCIL LENSBURY AVENUE Environment Services CHELSEA FOOTBALL CLUB No left and right MAY'11 A CEP Town Hall Extension, King Street turns, and additional London W6 9JU STAMFORD BRIDGE barriers added.
    [Show full text]
  • Hurlingham Walk Penthouses
    THE PENTHOUSES HURLINGHAM WALK 01 TO THE PENTHOUSES AT HURLINGHAM WALK THE HEIGHT OF LUXURY LIVING IN LONDON'S FASHIONABLE FULHAM Just four elegant penthouses overlooking a beautiful private courtyard garden, with far-reaching views over the River Thames and the treetops of Hurlingham Park and South Park. Located on the fifth floor, each of the penthouses incorporates expansive terraces and living areas finished to an exceptional specification. A concierge service and dedicated gated underground car parking add to the appeal of these impressive penthouses. HURLINGHAM WALK 03 LUXURIOUS MANSION STYLE APARTMENTS AT HURLINGHAM WALK Computer-generated image is indicative only and subject to change. THE PENTHOUSES 05 CLASSICAL ELEGANCE A N D S O P H I S T I C A T E D PENTHOUSE LIVING Computer-generated image is indicative only and subject to change. 07 THE LOCATION Hurlingham Walk is perfectly placed to make the most of Fulham’s vibrant atmosphere and is well served by a wealth of shops, bars and restaurants in nearby Parsons Green and New King’s Road. Surrounded by pockets of leafy parkland and on the doorstep of Chelsea, Hurlingham Walk is less than five miles from the centre of London. CHELSEA HARBOUR CHELSEA WANDSWORTH BRIDGE SOUTH PARK WANDSWORTH TOWN PARSONS GREEN HURLINGHAM GATE THE HURLINGHAM CLUB ST JAMES FUTURE DEVELOPMENT PUTNEY CONNECTIONS 09 THE HEART OF LONDON ON YOUR DOORSTEP Walking from Carnwath Road, Fulham NEW KING'S ROAD 0.6 MILES PARSONS GREEN STATION 0.9 MILES IMPERIAL WHARF STATION 1.1 MILES FULHAM ROAD 1.4 MILES London Underground from Parsons Green PADDINGTON 16 MINS VICTORIA 16 MINS WATERLOO 26 MINS KING'S CROSS ST.
    [Show full text]