DOCSLIB.ORG

Saitama Super Arena

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Saitama Super Arena Saitama Super Arena Basketball さいたまスーパーアリーナ バスケットボール / Basketball Super Arena de Saitama Women 女子 / Femmes WED 4 AUG 2021 Quarterfinal Start Time: 21:00 準々決勝 / Quart de finale Play by Play プレーバイプレー / Actions de jeux Game 44 ESP 64 vs 67 FRA (16-21, 14-15, 18-19, 16-12) Game Duration: 1:44 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Scoring by 5 min intervals: ESP 11 16 19 30 40 48 55 64 FRA 6 21 31 36 48 55 57 67 Quarter Starters: FIRST QUARTER ESP 5 OUVINA C 6 DOMINGUEZ S 7 TORRENS A 24 GIL L 45 NDOUR A FRA 5 MIYEM E 7 GRUDA S 10 MICHEL S 15 WILLIAMS G 39 DUCHET A Game ESP - Spain Score Diff. FRA - France Time 10:00 45 NDOUR A Jump ball won 7 GRUDA S Jump ball lost 5 OUVINA C 2PtsFG inside paint, Driving Layup missed, 5 9:46 OUVINA C Offensive rebound (1) 45 NDOUR A 2PtsFG inside paint, Layup made (2 Pts), 5 9:38 2-0 2 OUVINA C Assist (1) 10 MICHEL S 2PtsFG inside paint, Layup made (2 Pts), 39 9:18 2-2 0 DUCHET A Assist (1) 5 OUVINA C 2PtsFG outside paint, Pullup Jump Shot made (2 8:58 4-2 2 Pts), 24 GIL L Assist (1) 5 MIYEM E 2PtsFG outside paint, Jump Shot made (2 Pts), 10 8:33 4-4 0 MICHEL S Assist (1) 7 GRUDA S Blocked shot (1), 7 GRUDA S Defensive rebound 8:10 24 GIL L 2PtsFG inside paint, Layup blocked (1) 8:00 7 GRUDA S Turnover, Travelling (1) 7:41 7 TORRENS A 3PtsFG made (3 Pts), 24 GIL L Assist (2) 7-4 3 7:23 24 GIL L Defensive rebound (1) 39 DUCHET A 3PtsFG missed 7:17 10 MICHEL S Personal foul (P1,T1) 7:17 24 GIL L Foul drawn 7:03 5 MIYEM E Personal foul (P1,T2) 7:03 6 DOMINGUEZ S Foul drawn 6:58 7 TORRENS A 2PtsFG inside paint, Hook Shot missed 10 MICHEL S Defensive rebound (1) 6:50 5 OUVINA C Steal (1) 10 MICHEL S Turnover, Ball handling (1) 6 DOMINGUEZ S 2PtsFG fast break, Layup made (2 Pts), 7 6:45 9-4 5 TORRENS A Assist (1) 6:19 10 MICHEL S 2PtsFG inside paint, Driving Layup missed 6:18 Team Turnover, 24 seconds (1) 7 TORRENS A 2PtsFG inside paint, Floating Jump Shot 6:05 missed, 45 NDOUR A Offensive rebound (1) 6:02 45 NDOUR A 2PtsFG inside paint, Layup missed 10 MICHEL S Defensive rebound (2) 7 GRUDA S 2PtsFG inside paint, Layup made (2 Pts), 15 5:51 9-6 3 WILLIAMS G Assist (1) 5 OUVINA C 2PtsFG fast break, Pullup Jump Shot made (4 5:36 11-6 5 Pts) 5:21 10 MICHEL S Turnover, Travelling (2) 5:07 24 GIL L 2PtsFG outside paint, Jump Shot missed 5:05 Defensive Team rebound (1) 5:05 10 MICHEL S Substitute out, 23 JOHANNES M Substitute in 4:56 7 GRUDA S Offensive foul (P1,T3), Turnover (2) 4:56 6 DOMINGUEZ S Foul drawn 4:43 6 DOMINGUEZ S Turnover, Bad pass (1) 5 MIYEM E Steal (1) 15 WILLIAMS G 3PtsFG fast break made (3 Pts), 39 DUCHET 4:34 11-9 2 A Assist (2) 4:17 7 TORRENS A Turnover, Bad pass (1) 4:04 11-12 1 15 WILLIAMS G 3PtsFG made (6 Pts) 3:47 7 TORRENS A 3PtsFG made (6 Pts), 5 OUVINA C Assist (2) 14-12 2 3:36 7 TORRENS A Personal foul (P1,T1) 3:36 15 WILLIAMS G Foul drawn 3:30 7 TORRENS A Personal foul (P2,T2) BKBWTEAM5-------------QFNL000400--_69 5 Report Created WED 4 AUG 2021 22:49 Page 1/8 Saitama Super Arena Basketball さいたまスーパーアリーナ バスケットボール / Basketball Super Arena de Saitama Women 女子 / Femmes WED 4 AUG 2021 Quarterfinal Start Time: 21:00 準々決勝 / Quart de finale Play by Play プレーバイプレー / Actions de jeux Game 44 ESP 64 vs 67 FRA (16-21, 14-15, 18-19, 16-12) Game Duration: 1:44 Game ESP - Spain Score Diff. FRA - France Time 3:30 5 MIYEM E Foul drawn 3:30 7 TORRENS A Substitute out, 12 CAZORLA M Substitute in 3:25 45 NDOUR A Defensive rebound (2) 23 JOHANNES M 3PtsFG missed 3:15 7 GRUDA S Substitute out, 12 RUPERT I Substitute in 3:07 24 GIL L 2PtsFG inside paint, Layup missed 12 RUPERT I Defensive rebound (1) 15 WILLIAMS G 2PtsFG outside paint, Pullup Jump Shot 2:53 5 OUVINA C Defensive rebound (2) missed 2:51 12 RUPERT I Personal foul (P1,T4) 2:51 5 OUVINA C Foul drawn 2:51 5 MIYEM E Substitute out, 6 CHARTEREAU A Substitute in 2:36 12 CAZORLA M 3PtsFG missed 6 CHARTEREAU A Defensive rebound (1) 2:24 45 NDOUR A Defensive rebound (3) 15 WILLIAMS G 2PtsFG inside paint, Driving Layup missed 2:16 12 CAZORLA M 2PtsFG inside paint, Driving Layup missed 12 RUPERT I Defensive rebound (2) 39 DUCHET A 2PtsFG inside paint, Floating Jump Shot made 2:03 14-14 0 (2 Pts) 12 CAZORLA M 2PtsFG inside paint, Driving Layup made (2 1:45 16-14 2 Pts), 24 GIL L Assist (3) 23 JOHANNES M 2PtsFG outside paint, Floating Jump Shot 1:35 16-16 0 made (2 Pts), 39 DUCHET A Assist (3) 1:14 6 DOMINGUEZ S Turnover, Bad pass (2) 6 CHARTEREAU A Steal (1) 23 JOHANNES M 2PtsFG fast break, Layup made (4 Pts), 6 1:10 16-18 2 CHARTEREAU A Assist (1) 0:48 24 GIL L 2PtsFG inside paint, Layup missed 6 CHARTEREAU A Defensive rebound (2) 0:38 6 DOMINGUEZ S Personal foul (P1,T3) 0:38 39 DUCHET A Foul drawn 5 OUVINA C, 24 GIL L Substitute out, 14 CARRERA R, 18 0:38 CASAS Q Substitute in 15 WILLIAMS G, 39 DUCHET A Substitute out, 4 FAUTHOUX 0:38 M, 11 VUKOSAVLJEVIC V Substitute in 0:35 16-21 5 23 JOHANNES M 3PtsFG made (7 Pts) 0:13 6 DOMINGUEZ S Turnover, Ball handling (3) 4 FAUTHOUX M Steal (1) 0:00 23 JOHANNES M 3PtsFG missed Quarter Starters: SECOND QUARTER ESP 6 DOMINGUEZ S 12 CAZORLA M 14 CARRERA R 18 CASAS Q 45 NDOUR A FRA 4 FAUTHOUX M 6 CHARTEREAU A 11 VUKOSAVLJEVIC V 12 RUPERT I 23 JOHANNES M Game ESP - Spain Score Diff. FRA - France Time 10:00 Alternating Possession Gained 23 JOHANNES M 2PtsFG inside paint, Floating Jump Shot 9:52 missed, 11 VUKOSAVLJEVIC V Offensive rebound (1) 23 JOHANNES M 3PtsFG missed, 12 RUPERT I Offensive 9:47 rebound (3) 9:44 16-23 7 12 RUPERT I 2PtsFG inside paint, Layup made (2 Pts) 9:40 23 JOHANNES M Personal foul (P1,T1) 9:40 12 CAZORLA M Foul drawn 9:40 6 DOMINGUEZ S Substitute out, 5 OUVINA C Substitute in 9:33 12 CAZORLA M 3PtsFG missed 9:32 Offensive Team rebound (1) 9:32 Alternating Possession Gained 45 NDOUR A 3PtsFG missed, 18 CASAS Q Offensive 9:23 rebound (1) 5 OUVINA C 3PtsFG missed, 45 NDOUR A Offensive 9:09 rebound (4) BKBWTEAM5-------------QFNL000400--_69 5 Report Created WED 4 AUG 2021 22:49 Page 2/8 Saitama Super Arena Basketball さいたまスーパーアリーナ バスケットボール / Basketball Super Arena de Saitama Women 女子 / Femmes WED 4 AUG 2021 Quarterfinal Start Time: 21:00 準々決勝 / Quart de finale Play by Play プレーバイプレー / Actions de jeux Game 44 ESP 64 vs 67 FRA (16-21, 14-15, 18-19, 16-12) Game Duration: 1:44 Game ESP - Spain Score Diff. FRA - France Time 9:04 45 NDOUR A 2PtsFG inside paint, Layup made (4 Pts) 18-23 5 23 JOHANNES M 2PtsFG outside paint, Step Back Jump Shot 8:52 18-25 7 made (9 Pts) 8:31 5 OUVINA C 3PtsFG missed 11 VUKOSAVLJEVIC V Defensive rebound (2) 8:25 MONDELO L Timeout 8:25 45 NDOUR A Substitute out, 24 GIL L Substitute in 8:07 24 GIL L Steal (1) 6 CHARTEREAU A Turnover, Bad pass (1) 8:02 5 OUVINA C Turnover, Bad pass (1) 12 RUPERT I Steal (1) 11 VUKOSAVLJEVIC V 2PtsFG fast break, Layup made (2 7:58 18-27 9 Pts), 23 JOHANNES M Assist (1) 18 CASAS Q 2PtsFG outside paint, Pullup Jump Shot missed, 7:36 14 CARRERA R Offensive rebound (1) 7:34 12 RUPERT I Personal foul, 2 free throws awarded (P2,T2) 7:34 14 CARRERA R Foul drawn 7:34 12 CAZORLA M Substitute out, 7 TORRENS A Substitute in 7:34 12 RUPERT I Substitute out, 7 GRUDA S Substitute in 7:34 14 CARRERA R Free Throw made 1 of 2 (1 Pts) 19-27 8 7:34 14 CARRERA R Free Throw missed 2 of 2 7:34 Offensive Team rebound (2) 7:34 7 GRUDA S Personal foul (P2,T3) 7:34 24 GIL L Foul drawn 7 TORRENS A 3PtsFG missed, 24 GIL L Offensive rebound 7:29 (2) 7:14 14 CARRERA R Turnover, Bad pass (1) 4 FAUTHOUX M Steal (2) 6 CHARTEREAU A 2PtsFG outside paint, Jump Shot made (2 7:05 19-29 10 Pts), 23 JOHANNES M Assist (2) 6:48 5 OUVINA C 2PtsFG inside paint, Pullup Jump Shot missed 4 FAUTHOUX M Defensive rebound (1) 6:39 7 GRUDA S Turnover, Ball handling (3) 5 OUVINA C, 14 CARRERA R Substitute out, 6 DOMINGUEZ S, 6:39 12 CAZORLA M Substitute in 6:39 7 GRUDA S Substitute out, 5 MIYEM E Substitute in 18 CASAS Q 2PtsFG inside paint, Driving Layup missed, 24 6:23 GIL L Offensive rebound (3) 6:16 24 GIL L Turnover, Ball handling (1) 6 CHARTEREAU A Steal (2) 23 JOHANNES M 2PtsFG fast break, Layup made (11 Pts), 6 6:12 19-31 12 CHARTEREAU A Assist (2) 5:56 6 DOMINGUEZ S 3PtsFG missed 11 VUKOSAVLJEVIC V Defensive rebound (3) 5:53 12 CAZORLA M Substitute out, 45 NDOUR A Substitute in 5:31 23 JOHANNES M 3PtsFG missed 5:27 Team Turnover, 24 seconds (2) 5:10 45 NDOUR A 2PtsFG inside paint, Alley-oop missed 6 CHARTEREAU A Defensive rebound (3) 5:01 23 JOHANNES M Substitute out, 10 MICHEL S Substitute in 4:56 6 DOMINGUEZ S Defensive rebound (1) 11 VUKOSAVLJEVIC V 3PtsFG missed 4:43 11 VUKOSAVLJEVIC V Personal foul (P1,T4) 4:43 7 TORRENS A Foul drawn 4:43 6 CHARTEREAU A Substitute out, 8 CIAK H Substitute in 4:39 7 TORRENS A 3PtsFG missed 5 MIYEM E Defensive rebound (1) 4:29 7 TORRENS A Personal foul (P3,T1) 4:29 11 VUKOSAVLJEVIC V Foul drawn 4:29 18 CASAS Q Substitute out, 5 OUVINA C Substitute in 4:29 4 FAUTHOUX M Substitute out, 39 DUCHET A Substitute in 5 MIYEM E 2PtsFG outside paint, Pullup Jump Shot missed, 11 4:27 VUKOSAVLJEVIC V Offensive rebound (4) 11 VUKOSAVLJEVIC V 2PtsFG inside paint, Layup made (4 4:25 19-33 14 Pts) 4:09 5 MIYEM E Personal foul, 2 free throws awarded (P2,T5) BKBWTEAM5-------------QFNL000400--_69 5 Report Created WED 4 AUG 2021 22:49 Page 3/8 Saitama Super Arena Basketball さいたまスーパーアリーナ バスケットボール / Basketball Super Arena de Saitama Women 女子 / Femmes WED 4 AUG 2021 Quarterfinal Start Time: 21:00 準々決勝 / Quart de finale Play by Play プレーバイプレー / Actions de jeux Game 44 ESP 64 vs 67 FRA (16-21, 14-15, 18-19, 16-12) Game Duration: 1:44 Game ESP - Spain Score Diff.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Play by Play JPN 87 Vs 71 FRA FIRST QUARTER
    Saitama Super Arena Basketball さいたまスーパーアリーナ バスケットボール / Basketball Super Arena de Saitama Women 女子 / Femmes FRI 6 AUG 2021 Semifinal Start Time: 20:00 準決勝 / Demi-finale Play by Play プレーバイプレー / Actions de jeux Game 48 JPN 87 vs 71 FRA (14-22, 27-12, 27-16, 19-21) Game Duration: 1:31 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Scoring by 5 min intervals: JPN 9 14 28 41 56 68 78 87 FRA 11 22 27 34 44 50 57 71 Quarter Starters: FIRST QUARTER JPN 8 TAKADA M 13 MACHIDA R 27 HAYASHI S 52 MIYAZAWA Y 88 AKAHO H FRA 5 MIYEM E 7 GRUDA S 10 MICHEL S 15 WILLIAMS G 39 DUCHET A Game JPN - Japan Score Diff. FRA - France Time 10:00 8 TAKADA M Jump ball lost 7 GRUDA S Jump ball won 15 WILLIAMS G 2PtsFG inside paint, Driving Layup made (2 9:41 0-2 2 Pts) 8 TAKADA M 2PtsFG inside paint, Layup made (2 Pts), 13 9:19 2-2 0 MACHIDA R Assist (1) 9:00 52 MIYAZAWA Y Defensive rebound (1) 10 MICHEL S 2PtsFG inside paint, Driving Layup missed 52 MIYAZAWA Y 2PtsFG inside paint, Layup made (2 Pts), 13 8:40 4-2 2 MACHIDA R Assist (2) 8:40 10 MICHEL S Personal foul, 1 free throw awarded (P1,T1) 8:40 52 MIYAZAWA Y Foul drawn 8:40 52 MIYAZAWA Y Free Throw made 1 of 1 (3 Pts) 5-2 3 8:28 52 MIYAZAWA Y Defensive rebound (2) 10 MICHEL S 2PtsFG inside paint, Driving Layup missed 8:11 52 MIYAZAWA Y 3PtsFG missed 15 WILLIAMS G Defensive rebound (1) 8:03 5-4 1 15 WILLIAMS G 2PtsFG fast break, Driving Layup made (4 Pts) 88 AKAHO H 2PtsFG inside paint, Layup made (2 Pts), 13 7:53 7-4 3 MACHIDA R Assist (3) 7:36 39 DUCHET A 2PtsFG outside paint, Pullup Jump Shot missed 7:34 Defensive Team rebound (1) 7:14 13 MACHIDA
    [Show full text]
  • Coaches Handbook
    City of Buckeye COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT -Recreation Division- COACHES HANDBOOK Important dates Opening day: Saturday, June 16th Picture day: Tuesday, June 19th and Thursday, June 21st Last day: Saturday, July 28th Peter Piper pizza party nights: TBD Community Services Department’s Vision and Mission Statement Our Vision “Buckeye Is An Active, Engaged and Vibrant Community.” Our Mission We are dedicated to enriching quality of life, managing natural resources and creating memorable experiences for all generations. .We do this by: Developing quality parks, diverse programs and sustainable practices. Promoting volunteerism and lifelong learning. Cultivating community events, tourism and economic development. Preserving cultural, natural and historic resources. Offering programs that inspire personal growth, healthy lifestyles and sense of community. Dear Coach: Thank you for volunteering to coach with the City of Buckeye Youth Sports Program. The role of a youth sports coach can be very rewarding, but can be challenging at times as well. We have included helpful information in this handbook to assist in making this an enjoyable season for you and your team. Our youth sports philosophy is to provide our youth with a positive athletic experience in a safe environment where fun, skill development, teamwork, and sportsmanship lay its foundation. In addition, our youth sports programs is designed to encourage maximum participation by all team members; their development is far more important than the outcome of the game. Please be sure to remember you are dealing with children, in a child’s game, where the best motivation of all is enthusiasm, positive reinforcement and team success. If the experience is fun for you, it will also be fun for the kids on your team as well as their parents.
    [Show full text]
  • The Unseen Play the Game to Win 03/22/2017
    The Unseen Play the Game to Win 03/22/2017 Play the Game to Win What Rick Barry and the Atlanta Falcons can teach us about risk management “Something about the crowd transforms the way you think” – Malcolm Gladwell - Revisionist History With 4:45 remaining in Super Bowl LI, Matt Ryan, the Atlanta Falcons quarterback, threw a pass to Julio Jones who made an amazing catch. The play did not stand out because of the way the ball was thrown or the agility that Jones employed to make the catch, but due to the fact that the catch eas- ily put the Falcons in field goal range very late in the game. That reception should have been the play of the game, but it was not. Instead, Tom Brady walked off the field with the MVP trophy and the Patriots celebrated yet another Super Bowl victory. NBA basketball hall of famer Rick Barry shot close to 90% from the free throw line. What made him memorable was not just his free throw percentage or his hard fought play, but the way he shot the ball underhanded, “granny-style”, when taking free throws. Every basketball player, coach and fan clearly understands that the goal of a basketball game is to score the most points and win. Rick Bar- ry, however, was one of the very few that understood it does not matter how you win but most im- portantly if you win. The Atlanta Falcons crucial mistake and Rick Barry’s “granny” shooting style offer stark illustrations about how human beings guard their egos and at times do imprudent things in order to be viewed favorably by their peers and the public.
    [Show full text]
  • FIBA Official Interpretations 2019, JAN 2019
    2020 OFFICIAL BASKETBALL RULES OBRI – OFFICIAL INTERPRETATIONS Valid as of 1st January 2021 1 January 2021 version 2.0 Official Basketball Rules 2020 Official Interpretations Valid as of 1st January 2021 The colours demonstrate the content that was updated. (Yellow version) Page 2 of 112 OFFICIAL BASKETBALL RULES INTERPRETATIONS 1 January 2021 version 2.0 In case you find any inconsistency or error, please report the problem to: [email protected] 1 January 2021 version 2.0 OFFICIAL BASKETBALL RULES INTERPRETATIONS Page 3 of 112 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction . .......................................................................................................................................................... 5 Article 4 Teams ............................................................................................................................................... 6 Article 5 Players: Injury and assistance .................................................................................................... 7 Article 7 Head coach and first assistant coach: Duties and Powers ................................................. 10 Article 8 Playing time, tied score and overtime ...................................................................................... 12 Article 9 Beginning and end of a quarter, overtime or the game ........................................................ 14 Article 10 Status of the ball .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Official Basketball Statistics Rules Basic Interpretations
    Official Basketball Statistics Rules With Approved Rulings and Interpretations (Throughout this manual, Team A players have last names starting with “A” the shooter tries to control and shoot the ball in the and Team B players have last names starting with “B.”) same motion with not enough time to get into a nor- mal shooting position (squared up to the basket). Article 2. A field goal made (FGM) is credited to a play- Basic Interpretations er any time a FGA by the player results in the goal being (Indicated as “B.I.” references throughout manual.) counted or results in an awarded score of two (or three) points except when the field goal is the result of a defen- sive player tipping the ball in the offensive basket. 1. APPROVED RULING—Approved rulings (indicated as A.R.s) are designed to interpret the spirit of the applica- Related rules in the NCAA Men’s and Women’s Basketball tion of the Official Basketball Rules. A thorough under- Rules and Interpretations: standing of the rules is essential to understanding and (1) 4-33: Definition of “Goal” applying the statistics rules in this manual. (2) 4-49.2: Definition of “Penalty for Violation” (3) 4-69: Definition of “Try for Field Goal” and definition of 2. STATISTICIAN’S JOB—The statistician’s responsibility is “Act of Shooting” to judge only what has happened, not to speculate as (4) 4-73: Definition of “Violation” to what would have happened. The statistician should (5) 5-1: “Scoring” not decide who would have gotten the rebound if it had (6) 9-16: “Basket Interference and Goaltending” not been for the foul.
    [Show full text]
  • Ranking the Greatest NBA Players: an Analytics Analysis
    1 Ranking the Greatest NBA Players: An Analytics Analysis An Honors Thesis by Jeremy Mertz Thesis Advisor Dr. Lawrence Judge Ball State University Muncie, Indiana July 2015 Expected Date of Graduation May 2015 1-' ,II L II/du, t,- i II/em' /.. 2 ?t; q ·7t./ 2 (11 S Ranking the Greatest NBA Players: An Analytics Analysis . Iv/If 7 Abstract The purpose of this investigation was to present a statistical model to help rank top National Basketball Association (NBA) players of all time. As the sport of basketball evolves, the debate on who is the greatest player of all-time in the NBA never seems to reach consensus. This ongoing debate can sometimes become emotional and personal, leading to arguments and in extreme cases resulting in violence and subsequent arrest. Creating a statistical model to rank players may also help coaches determine important variables for player development and aid in future approaches to the game via key data-driven performance indicators. However, computing this type of model is extremely difficult due to the many individual player statistics and achievements to consider, as well as the impact of changes to the game over time on individual player performance analysis. This study used linear regression to create an accurate model for the top 150 player rankings. The variables computed included: points per game, rebounds per game, assists per game, win shares per 48 minutes, and number ofNBA championships won. The results revealed that points per game, rebounds per game, assists per game, and NBA championships were all necessary for an accurate model and win shares per 48 minutes were not significant.
    [Show full text]
  • YMCA Recreational Basketball Rules
    YMCA Recreational Basketball Rules All players must play at least half a game or receive equal playing time. Allowances may be made if practices are missed or for behavioral problems. Team rules should be in place by coaches and team members. Grades 2-4 Both Head Coaches will meet at mid-court socially distance prior to game with official(s) to discuss game procedure, special rules and odd/even number behind back for possession of ball (no center jump). Grades 5-8 Both Head Coaches will meet at mid-court socially distance prior to game to meet with official(s) to discuss game procedures. Tip off at center court to begin game. PLAYING RULES In general, the league will be governed by the Nebraska High School Basketball rules. 1. Bench Area Only the Head Coach can stand during game play (if bench/chairs present). Maximum of 2 coaches on bench. NO PARENTS IN BENCH AREA. 2. Time Limits Two 20 minute Halves. 3 minute break between halves. Grade 2 & 3: Score is not kept; clock will only stop on time-outs/injuries. Grades 4-8: Clock will only stop on time-outs/injuries and on all whistles in the final minute of the game, only if game is within 5 points. 3. Game Time Game may be started and played with 4 players (5th player, upon arrival, can sub in at dead ball). 4. Time-outs Each team is allowed one(1) full time-out and one(1) 30 second time-out per half. Time-outs DO NOT carry over to second half.
    [Show full text]
  • Floor Hockey Study Guide
    Floor Hockey Study Guide History Tom Harter, director of Civic Recreation in Battle Creek, Michigan, introduced the new game of floor hockey modified from the original game of ice hockey. Ice hockey began in Canada in the mid 1800’s. By 1900, it became the national sport of Canada. Since then, it has become more popular in many other countries, especially Russia, Sweden, and the United States. It is a fast paced game, and the only game allowing player substitutions during play. Now, over 1000 amateur players take part at the community, high school and college levels. Typically, hockey games are divided into 3-20 minute periods with 2 intermissions between them. The object is to score points by hitting the puck into the goal or net. Floor hockey is a modification of ice hockey with differences in rules and modifications and of course, no use of ice or skates. Balls can be used in replacement for pucks. Use of a ball makes stick handling easier and increases the pace of the game. Terms Assist ––– a pass from a teammate that leads to a goal. Blade ––– the curved end of the stick, front and back, used to hit the puck. Body or Shaft – the main part of the stick, used to hold and stickhandle. Butt or End – the end knob used for better grip, to keep the hand from sliding off the stick. Centering the puck ––– to pass to a spot (the point) in front of the opponents goal. Goalie Crease – the area where no player’s feet or stick, except for the goalie, is allowed during play.
    [Show full text]
  • Basketball Statistics Manual
    Basketball Statistics Manual FIBA Europe Statistics Manual Field Goals A field goal attempt (FGA) is charged to a player any time they shoot, throw or tap a live ball at their opponent’s basket in an attempt to score a goal unless the player is fouled in the act of shooting and the goal is missed or not counted. When a violation or foul is committed by the shooter or a player from either team, after the ball has been released for a shot, a FGA is credited because the shot would count if successful. A field goal attempt (FGA) is not charged to the shooter if the shot is nullified because of illegal interference with the ball (goal tending) by an offensive player. In this case the offensive player who commits the violation is charged with a turnover and a team rebound charged to the defensive team. A field goal made (FGM) is credited to a player any time a FGA by them results in a goal being scored or being awarded because of illegal interference with the ball (goal tending) by a defensive player. When a player is fouled in the act of shooting and the shot results in a FGM, then a FGA must also be credited. A FGA is not charged if the player shooting the ball, a teammate or a defensive player commits a violation or foul just prior to the ball being released. The official will call the violation or foul and signal that the score or play following the call is canceled. This indicates that the ball was not released for the shot prior to the infringement so no FGA is awarded.
    [Show full text]
  • Analyzing the Influence of Player Tracking Statistics on Winning Basketball Teams
    Analyzing the Influence of Player Tracking Statistics on Winning Basketball Teams Igor Stan čin * and Alan Jovi ć* * University of Zagreb Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing / Department of Electronics, Microelectronics, Computer and Intelligent Systems, Unska 3, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia [email protected], [email protected] Abstract - Basketball player tracking and hustle statistics year at the Olympic games, by winning a gold medal in the became available since 2013-2014 season from National majority of cases. Off the court, there are specialized Basketball Association (NBA), USA. These statistics provided personnel who try to improve each segment of the game, us with more detailed information about the played games. e.g. doctors, psychologists, basketball experts and scouts. In this paper, we analyze statistically significant differences One of the most interesting facts is that the teams in the in these recent statistical categories between winning and losing teams. The main goal is to identify the most significant league, and the league itself, have expert teams for data differences and thus obtain new insight about what it usually analysis that provide them with valuable information about may take to be a winner. The analysis is done on three every segment of the game. There are a few teams who different scales: marking a winner in each game as a winning make all of their decisions exclusively based on advanced team, marking teams with 50 or more wins at the end of the analysis of statistics. Few years ago, this part of season as a winning team, and marking teams with 50 or organization became even more important, because NBA more wins in a season, but considering only their winning invested into a computer vision system that collects games, as a winning team.
    [Show full text]
  • Briann January 5–8 • Guard Spokane, Wash
    Briann January 5–8 • Guard Spokane, Wash. Arizona State CAREER NOTES AT ASU • Nearly posted a double-double with 10 points, nine assists and two • 2008 & 2009 Pac-10 Defensive Player of the Year. steals in ASU’s first round NCAA win over Georgia. Seven of her 10 • 2008 (AP) and 2009 (AP and WBCA) Honorable Mention All-American. points (3-5 FGs) and six of her nine assists came in the second half. • 2009 All-Pac-10 First Team. • Overcame foul trouble and a sprained ankle in the second half to score • Arizona State’s all-time leader in assists (538) and free throw 11 points and dish out a team-high six assists in ASU’s 63-58 come-from- percentage (.830). behind win over Florida State. • Was also among ASU’s all-time leaders in steals (second, 265), free • Matched her scoring high in an NCAA Tournament game with 22 throws (second, 401), 3-point field goal percentage (fourth, .399), points (8-10 FGs, 6-6 FTs) to go along with five assists, two steals and 3-point field goals (fifth, 132) and scoring (seventh, 1,317 points). one block in ASU’s 84-69 win over Texas A&M in the Trenton Regional • In 2008-09 January set the school’s single-season record for 3-point semifinal (Mar. 29). field goals (65). She also tied the school’s single-game record with seven 3-pointers in ASU’s win at UC Davis on Dec. 3. 2007-08 • Is the only player in school history to lead the team in steals and • 2008 Associated Press Honorable Mention All-American.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020-21 Pac-12 Women's Basketball Conference Statistics All Games
    2020-21 Pac-12 Women's Basketball Page 1/6 Conference Statistics as of Apr 05, 2021 All games Scoring Offense Scoring Defense Team G W-L Pts Avg/G Team G Pts Avg/G 1. Stanford 33 31-2 2565 77.73 1. Stanford 33 1773 53.73 2. UCLA 23 17-6 1642 71.39 2. Arizona 27 1492 55.26 3. Oregon St. 20 12-8 1426 71.30 3. Arizona St. 24 1361 56.71 4. Oregon 24 15-9 1701 70.88 4. UCLA 23 1340 58.26 5. Arizona 27 21-6 1791 66.33 5. Oregon 24 1430 59.58 6. Colorado 23 12-11 1487 64.65 6. Colorado 23 1407 61.17 7. Southern California 23 11-12 1463 63.61 7. Washington St. 24 1522 63.42 8. Washington St. 24 12-12 1517 63.21 8. Washington 21 1363 64.90 9. Utah 21 5-16 1264 60.19 9. Oregon St. 20 1362 68.10 10. Washington 21 7-14 1234 58.76 10. Southern California 23 1584 68.87 11. Arizona St. 24 12-12 1296 54.00 11. California 17 1180 69.41 12. California 17 1-16 846 49.76 12. Utah 21 1489 70.90 Scoring Margin Free Throw Percentage Team G Off Def Margin Team G FTM FTA Pct. 1. Stanford 33 77.73 53.73 +24.00 1. Southern California 23 236 319 .740 2. UCLA 23 71.39 58.26 +13.13 2. Washington St. 24 239 326 .733 3. Oregon 24 70.88 59.58 +11.29 3.
    [Show full text]