OA ENR Hearing June 16
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Chapter 3. Ecosystem Profile
CHAPTER 3. ECOSYSTEM PROFILE 3.1 Introduction This ecosystem profile has been prepared to provide a basis for understanding how watershed processes affect the form and function of Mason County’s shorelines. This chapter provides an overview of the watershed conditions across the landscape and describes how ecosystem-wide processes affect the function of the County’s shorelines as required under shoreline guidelines outlined in WAC 173-26- 210(3)(d). This watershed-scale overview provides context for the reach-scale discussion provided in Chapters 4 through 9. The landscape analysis approach to understanding and analyzing watershed processes developed by Stanley et al. (2005) has been referenced to complete this section of the report. Terms used in this section are defined in the document entitled Protecting Aquatic Ecosystems: A Guide for Puget Sound Planners to Understand Watershed Processes (Stanley et al., 2005). The maps referenced in this chapter are provided in Appendix A (Map Folio). Mason County is located generally in the southwestern corner of the Puget Sound Basin in western Washington. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, Mason County has a total area of 1,051 square miles, of which 961 square miles is land and 90 square miles (8.6 percent) is water. Elevations in the County range from 6,400 feet above mean sea level (MSL) in the foothills of the Olympic Mountains, to sea level along the coastline of Puget Sound and Hood Canal. The County includes portions of five Water Resource Inventory Areas (WRIAs) as outlined below: • WRIA 14a: Kennedy Goldsborough; • WRIA 15: Kitsap; • WRIA 16/14b: Skokomish-Dosewallips and South Shore of Hood Canal; • WRIA 21: Queets-Quinault; and • WRIA 22: Lower Chehalis. -
HIKING Fall Is Prime Time to Hit NW Trails
WWW.MOUNTAINEERS.ORG SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER 2013 • VOLUME 107 • NO. 5 MountaineerE X P L O R E • L E A R N • C O N S E R V E HIKING Fall is prime time to hit NW trails INSIDE: 2013-14 Course Guide, pg. 13 Foraging camp cuisine, pg. 19 Bear-y season, pg. 21 Larches aglow, pg. 27 inside Sept/Oct 2013 » Volume 107 » Number 5 13 2013-14 Course Guide Enriching the community by helping people Scope out your outdooor course load explore, conserve, learn about, and enjoy the lands and waters of the Pacific Northwest and beyond. 19 Trails are ripe with food in the fall Foraging recipes for berries and shrooms 19 21 Fall can be a bear-y time of year Autumn is often when hiker and bear share the trail 24 Our ‘Secret Rainier’ Part III A conifer heaven: Crystal Peak 27 Fall is the right time for larches Destinations for these hardy, showy trees 37 A jewel in the Olympics 21 The High Divide is a challenge and delight 8 CONSERVATION CURRENTS Makng a case for the Wild Olympics 10 OUTDOOR ED Teens raising the bar in oudoor adventure 28 GLOBAL ADVENTURES European resorts: winter panaceas 29 WEATHERWISE 37 Indicators point to an uneventful fall and winter 31 MEMBERSHIP MATTERS October Board of Directors Elections 32 BRANCHING OUT See what’s going on from branch to branch 46 LAST WORD Innovation the Mountaineer uses . DISCOVER THE MOUNTAINEERS If you are thinking of joining—or have joined and aren’t sure where to start—why not set a date to meet The Mountaineers? Check the Branching Out section of the magazine (page 32) for times and locations of informational meetings at each of our seven branches. -
The Story of Three Olympic Peaks
THE STORY OF THREE OLYMPIC PEAKS The countless thousands who. from year to year. admire the three prominent peaks at the southeastern end of the Olympic Range would find themselves gazing at the wonderfully beautiful picture with even keener rapture if they but knew a part of the history interlocked with the names these peaks bear-Ellinor. The Brothers. and Constance. There are probably no other geographical features in the Pacific Northwest whose names involve a richer history. A beautiful and tender modesty screened the identity of the personalities behind those names. while a sin gle one of the four people survived. The last of the four was gathered to her fathers two years ago. and it is now possible to learn who were the people whose names have become so well known as geographical terms. In the first place let us see when and by whom the names were given to the mountains. The most accessible source is the Pacific Coast Pilot. which says: "When a vessel is going northward. and is clear of Vashon Island. the Jupiter Hills show over Blake Island. with Mount Constance to the southward. "1 A little further on the same work says; "Behind the Jupiter Hills is Mount Constance. 7777 feet elevation; Th~ Brothers. 6920 feet. and Mount Ellinor. estimated at 6500 feet. These great masses. rising so abruptly in wild, rocky peaks. are marks all over Admiralty Inlet and Puget Sound. but seem to overhang the main part of [Hood] Canal. The Brothers. a double peak. is less than seven miles from the water."2 Similar information is given in the reports made aI the time of the surveys. -
Lower Skokomish Vegetation Management Environmental
Lower Skokomish Vegetation Management United States Department of Agriculture Environmental Assessment Forest Hood Canal Ranger District, Olympic National Forest Service Mason County, Washington June 2016 USDA Non-Discrimination Policy Statement DR 4300.003 USDA Equal Opportunity Public Notification Policy (June 2, 2015) In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication fo r program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. -
Draft Mountain Goat Management Plan / Environmental Impact
Chapter 3: Affected Environment CHAPTER 3: AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT INTRODUCTION The “Affected Environment” describes existing conditions for those elements of the natural and cultural environments that could be affected by implementing the alternatives considered in this Mountain Goat Management Plan / Environmental Impact Statement (plan/EIS). These include (1) areas of Olympic National Park and Olympic National Forest on the Olympic Peninsula, from where mountain goats could be removed; and (2) areas in the North Cascades national forests, where mountain goats could be translocated. This Affected Environment chapter is therefore divided into two subsections addressing the affected environment of the Olympic Peninsula in Part One, followed by the North Cascades national forests in Part Two. On the Olympic Peninsula, mountain goat habitat comprises approximately 150,000 acres of high- elevation alpine and subalpine lands that are free of glacial ice and above 4,675 feet in elevation and within approximately 360 feet of steep rocky slopes (Jenkins et al. 2011a, 2016). Therefore, management activities associated with this plan/EIS would take place primarily above 4,000 feet, but some activity could take place in lower elevation areas during winter months. Management activities associated with alternatives B, C, and D would require multiple staging areas (as described in chapter 2) located strategically on both National Park Service (NPS) and National Forest System (NFS) lands. The discussion of the affected environment is limited to only those resources that may be affected by actions taken in identified mountain goat habitat and surrounding the staging areas (see figure 5 in chapter 2). The natural environment components addressed in this plan/EIS for the Olympic Peninsula include mountain goats, wilderness character, wildlife and wildlife habitat, vegetation, threatened or endangered species, acoustic environment, and soils. -
Mason County Regional Trails Plan for the Development of Countywide Trails, Bikeways and Water Trails
Mason County Regional Trails Plan For the Development of Countywide Trails, Bikeways and Water Trails Adopted March 18, 2008 Mason County Board of Commissioners Prepared by Mason County Department of Parks and Trails Mason County Regional Trails Committee and Mason County Department of Community Development Mason County Public Works March, 2008 2 MASON COUNTY REGIONAL TRAILS PLAN Mason County Commissioners Lynda Ring Erickson, Chair Tim Sheldon Ross Gallagher Mason County Department of Parks and Trails John Keates, Director Mason County Regional Trails Committee (2007) Tori Dulemba John Eaton Herb Gerhardt Sam Jarrett Mike Jensen John E. Johnson Thomas Kimball Dave O’Connell Anastasia Ruland Jesse Sims Jack Sisco Jim Tobey Dutch Van Elk Reed Waite Don Welander Ann Whitman Technical Assistance Sue Abbott, Community Planner National Park Service Rivers & Trails Program Susie Graham, Recreation Manager Hood Canal Ranger District (ONF), U.S. Forest Service TRAILS, BIKEWAYS AND WATER TRAILS MARCH, 2008 MASON COUNTY REGIONAL TRAILS PLAN 3 Mason County Trails Committee (2005) The 2005 Committee prepared the Mason County Master Trails Plan, “A Framework for Countywide Trail Development,” which provided the basis for this plan. Dave O’Connell, Chairman Jeff Carey, Vice Chairman Frank Benavente Maureen MacCracken Joetta Anderson Jean Bonzer Janet Shonk Carleen Coker Walt Hitchcock Paul Eveleth Bob Barnes Cheryl Weston Dana Tilton Steven Anderson Brad Carey John Johnson Tom Moran Mason County Planning and Public Works Support Staff Barbara A. Adkins, -
Appendix a Map Folio
APPENDIX A MAP FOLIO Map 1. Vicinity Map WRIA and Basins (Regional Context) Map 2a. Preliminary Shoreline Jurisdiction (including Shorelines of Statewide Significance Map 2b. Freshwater Reach Breaks (Poster) Map 2c. Marine Reach Breaks (Poster) Map 3. Transportation and Utilities Map 4. Hydrology (Streams, Wetland, CMZs) – Basin Scale Map 5. Geologic Formations (Geology) Map 6. Soil Hydrologic Classes (NRCS Soils) Map 7. Coastal Shoreform Types (PSNERP) Map 8. Fish and Wildlife Habitat Areas (WDFW) – Basin Scale Map 9. 2010 DOH Shellfish Growing Areas and Closure Zones Map 10. Frequest Flooded Areas Map 11. Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas Map 12. Landslide/Erosion Hazard Areas/Seismic Hazard Areas Map 13. Water Quality (2008 Ecology 303D Listings) Map 14. Parks, Open Space and Public Access Map 15. Land Cover (2009) Map 16. Shoreline Modifications and Impervious Surface Map 17. Overall Process Degradation (PSNERP) Map 18. Existing Land Use Map 19. Commercially Approved Aquaculture Leases on DNR Lands Map 20. Harbor Areas and Port Jurisdictions – MAP IN PROGRESS Map 21. Zoning Map 22. Current Shoreline Environment Designations Map 23. Restoration Opportunities – MAP IN PROGRESS Mason County Shoreline Inventory and Characterization Report - June 2011 Draft Appendix A Mason County Shoreline Master Program Map 1: Regional Context JEFFERSON KIT SAP GRAYS HARBOR PIERCE THURSTON WRIAs JEFFERSON Basins Queets- Quinault KITSAP Puget KING Sound WRIA Boundaries Hood Canal WRIA Boundaries Basins Basins (Mason County) Case Inlet Watershed Area Units (WAUs) Oakland Bay Waterbodies GRAYS HARBOR Satsop County Boundaries PIERCE WRIA 21 Totten Queets-Quinault WRIA 15 Little Kitsap Skookum Cities and Populated Places WRIA 16 â Place Names Skokomish- THURSTON Dosewallips Major Roads Indian Reservations WRIA 14b Shelton City Limits South Shore UGA RAC Hamlet Boundaries WRIA 14a WRIA 22 Kennedy-Goldsborough SMA Grant Agreement No. -
WA Template Final Draft 4-1-13.Indd
Skagit River. Cover Photo: Hoh River and Olympic Mountains. Letter from the President ivers are the great treasury of biological noted scientists and other experts reviewed the survey design, and diversity in the western United States. state-specifi c experts reviewed the results for each state. RAs evidence mounts that climate is The result is a state-by-state list of more than 250 of the West’s changing even faster than we feared, it outstanding streams, some protected, some still vulnerable. The becomes essential that we create sanctuaries Great Rivers of the West is a new type of inventory to serve the on our best, most natural rivers that will modern needs of river conservation—a list that Western Rivers harbor viable populations of at-risk species— Conservancy can use to strategically inform its work. not only charismatic species like salmon, but a broad range of aquatic and terrestrial This is one of 11 state chapters in the report. Also available are a species. summary of the entire report, as well as the full report text. That is what we do at Western Rivers Conservancy. We buy land With the right tools in hand, Western Rivers Conservancy is to create sanctuaries along the most outstanding rivers in the West seizing once-in-a-lifetime opportunities to acquire and protect – places where fi sh, wildlife and people can fl ourish. precious streamside lands on some of America’s fi nest rivers. With a talented team in place, combining more than 150 years This is a time when investment in conservation can yield huge of land acquisition experience and offi ces in Oregon, California, dividends for the future. -
Wild Olympics Wilderness and Wild and Scenic Rivers Act
116TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! 2d Session HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 116–388 WILD OLYMPICS WILDERNESS AND WILD AND SCENIC RIVERS ACT FEBRUARY 4, 2020.—Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed Mr. GRIJALVA, from the Committee on Natural Resources, submitted the following R E P O R T together with DISSENTING VIEWS [To accompany H.R. 2642] [Including cost estimate of the Congressional Budget Office] The Committee on Natural Resources, to whom was referred the bill (H.R. 2642) to designate and expand wilderness areas in Olym- pic National Forest in the State of Washington, and to designate certain rivers in Olympic National Forest and Olympic National Park as wild and scenic rivers, and for other purposes, having con- sidered the same, report favorably thereon with an amendment and recommend that the bill as amended do pass. The amendment is as follows: Strike all after the enacting clause and insert the following: SEC. 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Wild Olympics Wilderness and Wild and Scenic Riv- ers Act’’. SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF OLYMPIC NATIONAL FOREST WILDERNESS AREAS. (a) IN GENERAL.—In furtherance of the Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1131 et seq.), the following Federal land in the Olympic National Forest in the State of Wash- ington comprising approximately 126,554 acres, as generally depicted on the map entitled ‘‘Proposed Wild Olympics Wilderness and Wild and Scenic Rivers Act’’ and dated April 8, 2019 (referred to in this section as the ‘‘map’’), is designated as wil- derness and as components of the National Wilderness Preservation System: (1) LOST CREEK WILDERNESS.—Certain Federal land managed by the Forest Service, comprising approximately 7,159 acres, as generally depicted on the map, which shall be known as the ‘‘Lost Creek Wilderness’’. -
Mountain Goat Abundance and Population Trends in the Olympic Mountains, Northwestern Washington, 2016
Prepared in cooperation with the National Park Service Mountain Goat Abundance and Population Trends in the Olympic Mountains, Northwestern Washington, 2016 Open-File Report 2016–1185 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover: Photograph showing three mountain goats observed during aerial surveys in Olympic National Park, Washington, July 2016. Photograph by Patricia J. Happe, National Park Service. Mountain Goat Abundance and Population Trends in the Olympic Mountains, Northwestern Washington, 2016 By Kurt J. Jenkins, Patricia J. Happe, Katherine F. Beirne, and William T. Baccus Prepared in cooperation with the National Park Service Open-File Report 2016–1185 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2016 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit http://www.usgs.gov/ or call 1–888–ASK–USGS (1–888–275–8747). For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://store.usgs.gov/. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner. Suggested citation: Jenkins, K.J., Happe, P.J., Beime, K.F., and Baccus, W.T., 2016, Mountain goat abundance and population trends in the Olympic Mountains, northwestern Washington, 2016 : U.S. -
Mountain Goats in the Greater Yellowstone Area: Challenges for Management, Wildlife Society Bulletin, July 10, 2016
EXHIBIT INDEX BATES # DOCUMENT Ex001 - Robin J. Innes, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain 056 Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory, Oreamnos americanus, Fire Effects Information System (2011), Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/ (last visited August 8, 2017) Ex057 - Elizabeth Flesh et al., Range Expansion and Population Growth of Nonnative 066 Mountain Goats in the Greater Yellowstone Area: Challenges for Management, Wildlife Society Bulletin, July 10, 2016 Ex067 - Rolf Johnson, Washington Dept. of Game, Mountain Goats and Mountain Sheep 081 of Washington, January 1983 (excerpt) Ex082 - Clifford Rice & Don Gay, Effects of Mountain Goat Harvest on Historic and 100 Contemporary Populations, 91 Northwestern Naturalist 40 (2010) Ex101 - Bureau of Land Management, Status of the Science on Questions that Relate to 112 BLM Plan Amendment Decisions and Peninsular Ranges Bighorn Sheep (2001) Ex113 - Craig A. Stockwell & Gary C. Bateman, Conflicts in National Parks: A Case 124 Study of Helicopters and Bighorn Sheep Time Budgets at the Grand Canyon, 56 Biological Conservation 317 (1991) Ex125 - Steeve D. Cote, Mountain Goat Responses to Helicopter Disturbance, 24(4) 130 Wildlife Society Bulletin 681 (1996) Ex131 - Alexandre L. Rasiulis et al., The Effect of Radio-Collar Weight on Survival of 135 Migratory Caribou, 78(5) The Journal of Wildlife Management 953 (2014) Ex136 - Steven J. Cooke et al., Troubling issues at the frontier of animal tracking for 138 conservation and management, 00 Conservation Biology 0, 1 (2017) Ex139 - National Park Service, Olympic Nat’l Park, Draft Mountain Goat Management 166 Plan / Environmental Impact Statement (2017) (excerpt) Ex167 - National Park Service, Olympic Nat’l Park, Olympic National Park Minimum 192 Requirements Analysis, 2017 Ex193 - U.S. -
Water Resources
Chapter 4 Water Resources Section 1 A Precious Commodity By Christopher Dunagan Large pipes cany rushing -water fromthe impounded Skokomish Riverto thepowerhouse below Cushman Dam. TheNorth Fork of the Skokomish Cushman, the river rushes swiftly down a River begins its journey from a hillside of boulders. massive snowfield on the slopes In late May, the roaring waters are so of Mount Skokomish in Olympic fresh and clear that it is difficult to perceive National Park. As surrounding the swiftness of their flow. A ripple sparkles forests surrender their store of in the noonday sun, but is quickly gone, rain water — creek by creek, stream by rushing downstream in the blink of an eye, stream — the North Fork becomes a surging following the water's course toward Hood river, a force to be reckoned with. Canal. At Staircase Rapids, reached by hikers Experts measuring the flow in the along a picturesque trail above Lake North Fork say 7,000gallons pass this point •23* 24 • The Ecosystem in a single second. That's enough water to this indisputable fact have already begun to flush every toiletin Bremerton,then do so engage in a tug-of-war over its future use. again and again every 30seconds. Downstream from Staircase Rapids, a Water is so plentiful in this green land shaft of sunlight breaks through a heavy surrounding Hood Canal that it seems growth of fir and cedars. The sunbeam impossibleto ever run out. The wild and illuminates a deep pool of cold water, which free-flowing rivers provide what seemslike glows likea giant green emerald.