The Constructionalization of Body Part Terms in Arabic

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Constructionalization of Body Part Terms in Arabic The constructionalization of body part terms in Arabic Dana Abdulrahim University of Bahrain Terms denoting human/animal body parts have cross-linguistically been noted to have extended functions that go beyond their basic referential uses. For instance, terms such as HEAD, FACE, EYE have grammaticalized in some languages into spatial markers, while terms such as BODY and FACE have developed into reflexive markers (Heine and Kuteva, 2002). Terms referring to HEART, LIVER, BILE are noted to participate in constructions and idiomatic expressions that associate with emotions. In addition, terms denoting EAR, EYE, TONGUE, HAND, FOOT – that refer to body parts responsible for perception, motion, speech and other functions – can emerge in idiomatic collocations or as verbs that refer to dynamic situations in which those body part terms are typically used (Heine, 2011), as in could you hand me that book? Body part terms in Arabic show a similar pattern in that they participate in idiomatic expressions and can also be used to mark spatial relations. More interestingly, however, the majority of body part terms in Arabic are considered morphologically simple lexical items, in that little to zero derivation is involved in the lexicalization of terms such as ʽayn ‘eye’, ra’s ‘head’, baṭn ‘stomach’, etc. As a Semitic language, a large part of the process of lexicalizing verbs (and other lexical categories) relies on fitting bi-/tri-/quadri-consonantal ‘roots’ within particular morpho-phonological ‘grids’. According to many Arabists, the resulting lexical items are “variants [that] have a central, related lexical meaning, but each verb form has a different semantic slant on that meaning.” (Ryding, 2005:434). Arabic body part terms lend themselves to this type of process and serve as roots that can be systematically incorporated into verb ‘forms’ or constructions. For instance, tara’assa ‘headed s.th.’, as in tara’assa al’eǧtimaʿ ‘headed the meeting’, is an instance of a verb construction resulting from combining ra’s ‘head’ with Verb Form V. It has been argued that the 10 verb forms in Arabic vary in their individual (abstracted) meanings, and in the semantic load which they bring into the verb construction. The least complex Verb Form I is argued to be the “unaugmented” form, which is closest to the basic meaning of the root (Holes, 2004), while the “augmented” Forms (II – X) vary in terms of voice, valency, and aspect. That is to say, these verb forms are supposed to add, for instance, a causative, reciprocal, mutual, reflexive, or passive meaning to the root (Holes, 2004; Ryding 2005; among others). Yet, there is still no consensus among Arabists as to what may be considered the most fundamental meaning of each verb form. The question that this paper attempts to answer is what counts as a non-referential, yet integral part of the meaning of a body part term in Arabic that can contribute to the lexicalization of a verb and the construal of an event. I will discuss my preliminary examination of verb constructions hosting body part terms and showing a variety of meaning extensions that build on metaphorical and metonymical associations to particular body parts, as exhibited in Classical Arabic dictionary entries and Modern Standard Arabic corpora. In general, the analysis shows that the meaning extensions of these verbs do not always include a (direct) typical use of the body part, such as SEEING for EYE, or SMELLING for NOSE. For instance, a couple of verbs derived with ‘anf ‘nose’ may involve a temporal reading: ‘i’tanafa and ‘ista’nafa ‘to nose s.th.’ (both meaning ‘to resume’). In addition, a number of body part-related verbs that are derived with the supposedly “unaugmented” Verb Form I indicate the meaning of affliction. For example, naḥara, ‘to upper chest s.o.’, is to cut someone’s throat. Clearly, meaning extensions of such verbs in are not necessarily predictable, neither by the body parts they associate with nor by the semantic information presumably residing in the different morpho-phonological patterns of the Arabic verb. The result is an abstraction of the basic meaning of the body part, as in the ‘nose’ example. In this paper, I will also discuss the fact that while certain verb constructions are no longer in use in Modern Standard Arabic, the ones that persisted may have acquired more specific meanings in current language use and would therefore appear in a more limited set of constructions in MSA than they did in Classical Arabic. References Heine, B. “The Human Body as a Template in the Evolution of Grammar”. Presentation at the Body in Language: Lexicon, Metaphor, Grammar, and Culture; University of Warsaw, Poland, 21-22 October 2011. Heine, B., & Kuteva, T. (2002). World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Holes, C. (2004). Modern Arabic, revised edition: Modern Arabic: Structures, functions, and varieties. Washington: Georgetown University Press. Ryding, K. C. (2005). A reference grammar of Modern Standard Arabic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Two kinds of cognitive pedagogical grammars Michel Achard Rice University Recent publications have illustrated the benefits of adopting the Cognitive Linguistics (CL) model to second language teaching. This presentation further highlights the model’s contributions by presenting two different views of grammatical instruction that both implement the CL’s most basic tenets. These two methods afford second language instructors the flexibility of addressing the pedagogical demands of specific grammatical constructions with the most appropriate tools to introduce them in their classroom. In the usage-based model (Langacker 2000), the form of grammar reflects the users’ expression of their conceptualizations in specific “usage events” (Langacker 2000: 10). Grammatical rules emerge from their multiple instances, and represent the conventionalized ways of construing the conceptualized scenes. In a second language, teaching grammar therefore consists in placing the learner in the best conditions to make the kinds of choices a native speaker would make in similar situations. Consequently, usage-based instruction will be inductive (since rules emerge out of usage), implicit (since syntax has no particular status in acquisition), and will include as few metalinguistic concepts as possible since the rules are merely more abstract than their instances. Cognitive Linguistics also places strong emphasis on the sociocultural dimensions of language learning because the child’s linguistic system is formed largely in relation to other users. For a second language learner, the classroom context provides the locus where instruction and development are drawn together “into an organic unity that arises in concrete practical activity.” (Negueruela and Lantolf 2006: 80). Since second language learners already possess a fully developed conceptual system, “[s]econd language instruction is a matter of not only learning new forms but also internalizing new or reorganizing already existing concepts.” (Negueruela and Lantolf 2006: 81). Consequently, “[c]oncept-based instruction supports explicit instruction in grammar to promote the learner’s awareness and control over specific conceptual categories as they are linked to formal properties of language” (Negueruela and Lantolf 2006: 82). In this view, new concepts are not only explicit, but also “talked through” with the help of didactic models such as charts and diagrams, in order to ensure successful incorporation into the learner’s cognitive system. The adoption of the CL model therefore seems to lead instructors along two seemingly opposite paths. On the one hand, teaching grammar as usage demands inductive, implicit, bottom-up instruction, while teaching grammar as concepts requires deductive, explicit, top-down introduction. This presentation shows that far from being problematic, this situation allows instructors to considerably extend the scope of their grammatical instruction because different constructions lend themselves better to different presentational strategies. Concept-based instruction is particularly efficient with “formal” categories, i.e. categories where a specific form is reliably associated with a specific meaning, while usage-based instruction is preferred to introduce grammatical categories whose meaning is not reflected by a single form. This is in particular the case for “functional” categories composed of different forms held together by common semantic functions and idioms or semi-constructed chunks. This presentation examines examples of both “formal” and “functional” categories to illustrate how usage-based and concept- based instructions combine to provide successful grammatical instruction in the communicative classroom. References Langacker, R. W. 2000. A dynamic usage-based model. In M. Barlow & S. Kemmer (eds.), Usage-Based Models of Language (pp.1-63). Stanford: CSLI. Negueruela, E. & J. Lantolf. 2006. Concept-based instruction and the acquisition of L2 Spanish. In R. Salaberry, & B. Lafford (eds.), The Art of Teaching Spanish (pp. 65-100). Georgetown: Georgetown University Press. The Agreement Construction Carlos Acuña-Fariña USC, Spain Construction Grammar has offered insightful accounts of a large set of both regular and idiosyncratic constructions, including idioms and all kinds of ‘prefabs’, as well as of variously productive constructions like the Time Away Construction, the What´s X doing Y Construction, and many others. An outstanding lacuna in this large set of studies
Recommended publications
  • UNIVERSITY of MALAYA Universitykuala LUMPUR of Malaya
    MIMETIC WORDS AND LEXICALIZATION PATTERNS IN A JAPANESE NOVEL AND ITS ENGLISH TRANSLATION NG KAR PEK FACULTY OF LANGUAGES AND LINGUISTICS UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA UniversityKUALA LUMPUR of Malaya 2017 i MIMETIC WORDS AND LEXICALIZATION PATTERNS IN A JAPANESE NOVEL AND ITS ENGLISH TRANSLATION NG KAR PEK DISSERTATION SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF LINGUISTICS FACULTY OF LANGUAGES AND LINGUISTICS UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR University of Malaya 2017 i UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA ORIGINAL LITERARY WORK DECLARATION Name of Candidate: NG KAR PEK Registration/Matric No.: TGC 120007 Name of Degree: MASTER OF LINGUISTICS Title of Dissertation (“this Work”): MIMETIC WORDS AND LEXICALIZATION PATTERNS IN A JAPANESE NOVEL AND ITS ENGLISH TRANSLATION Field of Study: COGNITIVE LINGUISTICS I do solemnly and sincerely declare that: (1) I am the sole author/writer of this Work; (2) This Work is original; (3) Any use of any work in which copyright exists was done by way of fair dealing and for permitted purposes and any excerpt or extract from, or reference to or reproduction of any copyright work has been disclosed expressly and sufficiently and the title of the Work and its authorship have been acknowledged in this Work; (4) I do not have any actual knowledge nor ought I reasonably to know that the making of this work constitutes an infringement of any copyright work; (5) I hereby assign all and every right in the copyright to this Work to the University of Malaya (“UM”), who henceforth shall be the owner of the copyright in this Work and that any reproduction or use in any form or by any means whatsoever is prohibited without the written consent of UM having been first had and obtained; (6) I am fully aware that if in the course of making this Work, I have infringed any copyright whether intentionally or otherwise, I may be subject to legal action or any other action as may be determined by UM.
    [Show full text]
  • Festschrift 2012.Pdf
    Das Forum Russische Kultur Gütersloh e. V. hat über zwei Jahr- zehnte Beziehungen zwischen Menschen in Deutschland und Russland her­gestellt, gepflegt und vermittelt und damit einen anerkannten Beitrag zur Verständigung beider Völker geleistet. Verantwortlich: Forum Russische Kultur Gütersloh e. V. Ignaz-Jaspers-Straße 30, 33332 Gütersloh Redaktion: Heinz Schaefer, Franz Kiesl (V.i.S.P.) Gestaltung: Günter Pohlschmidt Fotos: Forum-Archiv Druck: art + image, Dresdner Straße 4, 32423 Minden Auflage: 2000 Gütersloh 2011 Schutzgebühr 5,00 € Inhalt Zum Geleit 4 Grußworte Unsere Veranstaltungen Bürgermeisterin Maria Unger 5 Russische Kulturwochen in Gütersloh 91 Generalkonsul Jewgenij Schmagin 6 Lesungen und Vorträge 95 Dr. Ernst-Jörg von Studnitz 7 Vortrag des Generalkonsuls J. Schmagin 96 Ausstellungen 98 Der Anfang einer Erfolgsgeschichte Unsere Jubiläen 99 Franz Kiesl berichtet 9 Widmung von Lew Kopelew 10 Völkerfreundschaft mit Hilfe der Musik Musik verbindet junge Menschen Unsere Beziehungen über alle Grenzen 106 Beziehungen zu unseren 17 Partnern 12 Zusammenarbeit der Kreismusikschule Besuche in Susdal 47 mit den »Neuen Namen« 107 Besuche des sowjetischen Friedhofs Grundschulen sammeln Erfahrung in in Stukenbrock-Senne 54 Kultur und Völkerfreundschaft 109 Vergangene Partnerschaften 56 »Junge Sinfoniker« 113 Unsere Kooperationspartner Unsere Reisen Der Verein »Wasilissa« 67 Reisen in sechs russische Städte 117 Deutsch-Russische Gesellschaft Paderborn e. V. 68 Besuche in russischen Universitäten 154 Das Forum baut auf alten Traditionen
    [Show full text]
  • William Snyder the Compounding Parameter (TCP)
    To appear in Violeta Demonte and Louise McNally (eds.) Telicity, Change, and State . Oxford: OUP. 1 PARAMETER THEORY AND MOTION PREDICATES William Snyder The Compounding Parameter (TCP) of (Snyder 1995, 2001) has been linked to a number of the same points of cross-linguistic variation that Leonard Talmy (1985, 1991, 2000) addresses in his well-known verb-framed / satellite-framed typology. Talmy differentiates between languages in which path-of-motion is normally encoded in the main verb of a clause ("verb-framed" languages), and those in which path-of-motion is more commonly expressed outside the verb ("satellite-framed" languages). Both the English type of verb-particle construction (where the particle can be separated from the verb by a phrasal constituent, as in Mary pulled the lid off ) and the English adjectival resultative construction ( John wiped the table clean ) have been argued to depend on the positive setting of TCP (e.g. Snyder 2001, Sugisaki & Isobe 2000); and both are typical of Talmy's satellite-framed languages (e.g. Talmy 1985:68,104). Likewise, researchers have argued that a spatial PP (such as under the bridge ) can convert a pure manner-of-motion activity predicate (Sue swam for/*in 15 minutes ) into an accomplishment ( Sue swam under the bridge in 15 minutes ) only in [+ TCP] languages (Beck & Snyder 2001, Gehrke 2008), and only in satellite-framed languages (cf. Aske 1989:6-7). This chapter examines the precise role of TCP in the linguistic expression of motion events. One of my central claims will be that TCP should be understood as the availability, or unavailability, of a specific rule of semantic composition, which I term To appear in Violeta Demonte and Louise McNally (eds.) Telicity, Change, and State .
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Computational Typology and Multilingual NLP, Pages 1–9 June 10, 2021
    SIGTYP 2021 The 3rd Workshop on Research in Computational Typology and Multilingual NLP Proceedings of the Workshop June 10, 2021 ©2021 The Association for Computational Linguistics Order copies of this and other ACL proceedings from: Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) 209 N. Eighth Street Stroudsburg, PA 18360 USA Tel: +1-570-476-8006 Fax: +1-570-476-0860 [email protected] ISBN 978-1-954085-34-3 ii SIGTYP 2021 is the third edition of the workshop for typology-related research and its integration into multilingual Natural Language Processing (NLP). The workshop is co-located with the 2021 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (NAACL 2021), which takes place virtually this year. Our workshop includes a shared task on robust language identification from speech. The final program of SIGTYP contains 4 keynote talks, 3 shared task papers, 10 archival papers, and 14 extended abstracts. This workshop would not have been possible without the contribution of its program committee, to whom we would like to express our gratitude. We should also thank Claire Bowern, Miryam de Lhoneux, Johannes Bjerva, and David Yarowsky for kindly accepting our invitation as invited speakers. The workshop is generously sponsored by Google. Please find more details on the SIGTYP 2021 website: https://sigtyp.github.io/ws2021. html iii Organizing Committee: Ekaterina Vylomova, University of Melbourne Elizabeth Salesky, Johns Hopkins University Sabrina Mielke, Johns Hopkins University Gabriella Lapesa, University of Stuttgart Ritesh Kumar, Bhim Rao Ambedkar University Harald Hammarström, Uppsala University Ivan Vulic,´ University of Cambridge Anna Korhonen, University of Cambridge Roi Reichart, Technion – Israel Institute of Technology Edoardo M.
    [Show full text]
  • Revising Talmy's Typological Classification of Complex Events
    Revising Talmy’s typological classification of complex event constructions William Croft, University of New Mexico, USA, [email protected] Jóhanna Barðdal, University of Bergen, Norway, [email protected] Willem Hollmann, University of Lancaster, UK, [email protected] Violeta Sotirova, University of Nottingham, UK, [email protected] Chiaki Taoka, Kobe College, Japan, [email protected] 1. Introduction In this chapter, we critically examine Talmy’s typological classification of complex event constructions. Talmy first proposed a typological classification of motion event constructions over thirty years ago (Talmy 1972, 1974, 1985); he later extended his typological classification to event constructions in general, particularly, constructions expressing events with resulting states (Talmy 1991, 2000). Talmy’s extension of his typological classification reflects a parallel generalization of the analysis of resultative constructions to include constructions of motion events with a path to a destination (e.g. Goldberg 1995, Rappaport Hovav and Levin 2001). Talmy’s typological classification of complex event constructions has been extremely influential in linguistics and psycholinguistics. More recently, however, it has started to be modified, in order to account for languages that do not quite fit into the classification. New types have been proposed, by Talmy himself and by others. We developed a similar but more detailed typology independently of the analyses offered by other researchers. We propose two revisions to Talmy’s typological classification (a brief outline is found in Croft 2003:220-24). The first is given in (1): (1) Talmy’s typological classification of complex event constructions must be elaborated to include additional types.
    [Show full text]
  • A Look Into the Acquisition of English Motion Event Conflation by Native Speakers of Chinese and Japanese
    PACLIC 24 Proceedings 563 A Look into the Acquisition of English Motion Event Conflation by Native Speakers of Chinese and Japanese Ryan Spring Graduate School of International Cultural Studies, Tohoku University Aoba-ku Kawauchi 41, Sendai City, 980-8576, Japan [email protected] Abstract. Since Talmy (2000 a&b) introduced his linguistic typology based on event conflation, it has been the source of much debate and ongoing research. One area that can particularly benefit from such research is the field of Second Language Acquisition. Cadierno (2008), Inagaki (2002) and many others have attempted to unveil the differences and difficulties that occur when learning a second language that is of a different type than one's native language. However, the current research in this area has thus far only dealt with satellite-framed and verb-framed languages. According to Slobin (2004), Chen and Guo (2008) and others, languages such as Chinese can be considered to be of a third type, known as equipollently-framed languages. This paper presents research that has attempted to observe the differences and similarities in the acquisition of a satellite-framed language (English) by native speakers of a verb-framed language (Japanese) and an equipollently- framed language (Chinese). Keywords: Second Language Acquisition, Motion Events, Event Conflation, Cognitive Linguistics, Equipollently-framed Language 1 Introduction Talmy (2000 a&b) introduced the idea of complex events that he termed 'macro-events'. He said that such events can be conceptualized as being comprised of two simpler events and the relation between them. For example, (1a), shown below, can be conceptualized as one event, and thus expressed in one sentence or phrase, but is actually made up of the two events, shown in (1b) and (1c).
    [Show full text]
  • Reconstruction and Analysis of the Pupil Dilation Signal: Application to a Psychophysiological Affective Protocol
    2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC 2013) Osaka, Japan 3 – 7 July 2013 Pages 1-534 IEEE Catalog Number: CFP13EMB-POD ISBN: 978-1-4577-0215-0 1/12 Program in Chronological Order * Following Paper Title – Paper not Available Thursday, 4 July 2013 ThA01: 08:00-09:30 Conference Hall (12F) 1.1.1 Nonstationary Processing of Biomedical Signals I (Oral Session) Chair: Yoshida, Hisashi (Kinki Univ.) 08:00-08:15 ThA01.1 Estimation of Dynamic Neural Activity Including Informative Priors into a Kalman Filter Based Approach: A simulation study ........................................................................................................................................ N/A Martínez-Vargas, Juan David Universidad Nacional de Colombia; Castaño-Candamil, Juan Sebastián Universidad Nacional de Colombia; Castellanos-Dominguez, Germán Universidad Nacional de Colombia 08:15-08:30 ThA01.2 Reconstruction and Analysis of the Pupil Dilation Signal: Application to a Psychophysiological Affective Protocol ....................................................................................................................... 5-8 Onorati, Francesco Politecnico di Milano; Barbieri, Riccardo MGH-Harvard Medical School-MIT; Mauri, Maurizio IULM University of Milan; Russo, Vincenzo IULM University of Milan; Mainardi, Luca Politecnico di Milano 08:30-08:45 ThA01.3 Adaptive Sensing of ECG Signals Using R-R Interval Prediction ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Semantic Specificity of Perception Verbs in Maniq
    Semantic specificity of perception verbs in Maniq © Ewelina Wnuk 2016 Printed and bound by Ipskamp Drukkers Cover photo: A Maniq campsite, Satun province, Thailand, September 2011 Photograph by Krittanon Thotsagool Semantic specificity of perception verbs in Maniq Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen op gezag van de rector magnificus prof. dr. J.H.J.M. van Krieken, volgens besluit van het college van decanen in het openbaar te verdedigen op vrijdag 16 september 2016 om 10.30 uur precies door Ewelina Wnuk geboren op 28 juli 1984 te Leżajsk, Polen Promotoren Prof. dr. A. Majid Prof. dr. S.C. Levinson Copromotor Dr. N. Burenhult (Lund University, Zweden) Manuscriptcommissie Prof. dr. P.C. Muysken Prof. dr. N. Evans (Australian National University, Canberra, Australië) Dr. N. Kruspe (Lund University, Zweden) The research reported in this thesis was supported by the Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften, München, Germany. For my parents, Zofia and Stanisław Contents Acknowledgments ............................................................................................. i Abbreviations ................................................................................................ vii 1 General introduction ........................................................................................ 1 1.1 Aim and scope ................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Theoretical background to verbal semantic specificity
    [Show full text]
  • Verb Chains in Nizaa
    Verb chains in Nizaa Bjørghild Kjelsvik Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Cand. Philol. Department of Linguistics University of Oslo Oslo November 2002 II Verb chains in Nizaa Bjørghild Kjelsvik Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Cand. Philol. Department of Linguistics University of Oslo Oslo 5th November 2002 IV TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 3 1.1 THE NIZAA LANGUAGE 3 1.2 STRUCTURE OF THE THESIS: 3 1.2.1 THE MAIN POINTS OF THE THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK AND HOW IT IS USED: 3 1.3 THE CORPUS 4 1.3.1 THE FORMALISM OF THE EXAMPLES 5 1.3.2 OTHER FORMALISMS: 6 1.3.3 ABBREVIATIONS 7 1.4 ON THE TEXTS 7 2 A SHORT OVERVIEW OF NIZAA GRAMMAR 9 2.1 PHONOLOGY 9 2.1.1 SYLLABLE-STRUCTURE 9 2.1.2 VOWELS 9 2.1.3 CONSONANTS 10 2.1.4 MORPHOPHONOLOGY 11 2.1.5 TONES 12 2.2 WORD ORDER AND SENTENCE TYPES. 13 2.3 NOUNS 17 2.4 PRONOUNS 18 2.5 VERBS AND VERB MORPHOLOGY 18 2.5.1 VERBAL DERIVATIONS 18 2.5.2 INFLECTIONS: 20 3 MULTIPLE VERBS IN NIZAA CLAUSES 22 3.1 FORMAL CHARACTERISTICS 22 3.2 FREQUENCIES 23 3.2.1 COMMENTS ON THE TABLES: 26 3.3 DISTRIBUTION PATTERNS IN 2-VERB CHAINS 27 3.3.1 COMMENTS ON THE DISTRIBUTION PATTERN TABLES: 30 3.4 SERIAL VERBS 30 3.4.1 NIZAA CHAINS - SERIAL VERBS OR COMPOUNDS? 31 I TABLE OF CONTENTS 4 THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK OF THE THESIS 34 4.1 EVENT INTEGRATION 34 4.1.1 MACRO-EVENT, FRAMING EVENT AND CO-EVENT 35 4.1.2 THE FRAMING EVENT 36 4.1.3 THE CO-EVENT 39 4.2 FRAMING EVENTS IN A TYPOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE 41 4.2.1 SATELLITES 41 4.2.2 SATELLITE-FRAMED
    [Show full text]
  • EMPIRICAL STUDY Particle Placement in Learner Language
    Language Learning ISSN 0023-8333 EMPIRICAL STUDY Particle Placement in Learner Language Stefanie Wulff and Stefan Th. Gries University of Florida and University of California at Santa Barbara This study presents the first multifactorial corpus-based analysis of verb–particle con- structions in a data sample comprising spoken and written productions by intermediate- level learners of English as a second language from 17 language backgrounds. We annotated 4,911 attestations retrieved from native speaker and language learner corpora for 14 predictors, including syntactic complexity, rhythmic and segment alternation, and the verb framing of the speaker’s native language. A multifactorial prediction and deviation analysis using regression (Gries & Deshors, 2014), which stacks multiple regression analyses to compare native speaker and learner productions in identical con- texts, revealed a complex picture in which processing demands, input effects, and native language typology jointly shape the degree to which learners’ choices of constructions are nativelike or not. Keywords verb–particle construction; particle placement; learner corpus research; multifactorial regression; mixed-effects model; second language Introduction The acquisition of multiword units constitutes a challenging aspect of learning a language, be it a learner’s first language (L1) or second language (L2). One type of multiword unit in English is verb–particle constructions (VPCs; also called transitive phrasal verbs), that is, combinations of a verb and a particle such as pick up NP, take out NP, or throw away NP (where NP stands for a noun phrase). VPCs are particularly difficult to acquire for several reasons. For one, they, although ubiquitous in English, are not particularly frequent in non- Germanic languages, so many L2 learners of English do not benefit from having We are grateful to the three anonymous reviewers and to Associate Editor Scott Crossley for their helpful and insightful comments.
    [Show full text]
  • Reading, Amounting in Fact to a Theoretical Exegesis
    Law and Forensic Science Volume 10 2015 (2) Law and Forensic Science Available at lawforensics.org Published in 2015. Copyright © 2015 belongs to the authors All rights for this volume reserved. No part of this volume may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISSN: 2080-9670 General Editors JAKUB J. SZCZERBOWSKI, Ph.D – Chief editor KRZYSZTOF KRASSOWSKI, Ph.D. – Vice-chief editor BENEDYKT PUCZKOWSKI, Ph.D. – Statistical editor Editorial Board CARMEN ESTEVAN, Professor – University of Valencia, Spain – Commercial Law ANTONIO FERNÁNDEZ DE BUJÁN, Professor – Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain – Roman Law MARIUSZ JERZY GOLECKI, Professor – University of Lodz – Roman Law, Law and Economics EWA GRUZA, Professor – University of Warsaw, Poland – Forensic Science ALESSANDRO HIRATA, Professor – University of São Paulo, Brasil – Roman Law GABRIELE JUODKAITE-GRANSKIENE – Associated Professor, Vilnius University, Lithuania – Forensic Science EVA KLONOWSKI, Ph.D. – Iceland/Bosnia and Herzegovina – Forensic Anthropology LUZ MARTINEZ VELENCOSO, Professor – University of Valencia, Spain – Civil Law WITOLD PEPIŃSKI, Professor – Medical University of Bialystok, Poland – Forensic Genetics ALDO PETRUCCI, Professor – University of Pisa, Italy – Roman Law, Comparative Law BRONISŁAW SITEK, Professor – SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Poland – Roman Law, Comparative Law JUAN
    [Show full text]
  • Book of Abstracts NAMED 2019 on Fictive Motion in Language
    Book of Abstracts NAMED 2019 On fictive Motion in Language May 23rd-24th, 2019 – Paris, France 1 PROGRAM Thursday May 23 9:30-10:00 am Welcome 10:00-11:00 am Plenary talk Jean-Michel Fortis (HTL, CNRS & Université Paris Diderot, France) Motion and the cognitive perspective on language: historical and critical notes 11:00-11:30 am Coffee Break 11:30-12:00 am Fabien Capelli (CLLE-ERSS, CNRS & Université Toulouse Jean Jaurès, France) Some figures and grounds about fictive motion in French 12:00-12:30 am Daria Lapenkova (National Research University ‘Higher School of Economics’, Moscow, Russia) Motion verbs in Avar 12:30-2:00 pm Lunch Break 2:00-3:00 pm Plenary talk Tuomas Huumo (University of Turku | UTU · School of Languages and Translation Studies, Finland) Scalarity, scanning, and fictive motion: What degree modifiers reveal about the meaning of Finnish adpositions 3:00-3:30 pm Rusudan Gersamia (School of Arts and Sciences, Institute of Linguistic Studies, Ilia State University, Tbilisi, Georgia) Fictive Motion Construction in Megrelian (Road, Sun, Time) 3:30-4:00 pm Alexandre François (Lattice, CNRS-ENS PSL & Université Sorbonne Nouvelle) Literal and figurative motion in some Oceanic languages 4:00-4:30 pm Coffee Break 4:30-5:00 pm Anastasia Yakovleva (National Research University ‘Higher School of Economics’, Moscow, Russia) Cardinal points and fictive motion strategies: a diachronic perspective 5:00-5:30 pm Castrenze Nigrelli (Università degli Studi di Palermo (Palermo, Italy) – Dipartimento di Scienze Umanistiche) Aspectual features
    [Show full text]