DOCSLIB.ORG

Kenai National Wildlife Refuge Species List, Version 2016-11-18

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kenai National Wildlife Refuge Species List, Version 2016-11-18 Kenai National Wildlife Refuge Species List, version 2016-11-18 Kenai National Wildlife Refuge biology staff November 18, 2016 2 Cover images represent changes to the checklist. Top left: Impatiens noli- tangere at Jims' Landing on August 15, 2016 (http://www.inaturalist. org/observations/3893699), Image CC BY Matt Bowser. Top right: Oryctolagus cuniculus observed at the Refuge's shop area on Ski Hill Road on August 26, 2016 (http://www.inaturalist.org/observations/ 3967164), Image CC BY Matt Bowser. Bottom left: Lycia rachelae ob- served at Headquarters Lake on April 7, 2016 (http://arctos.database. museum/guid/KNWR:Ento:10862), Image CC0 Matt Bowser. Bottom right: Onnia tomentosa observed near the Refuge's headquarters, August 10, 2016 (http://www.inaturalist.org/observations/3855184). Image CC BY Matt Bowser. Contents Contents 3 Introduction 5 Purpose............................................................ 5 About the list......................................................... 5 Acknowledgments....................................................... 5 Refuge checklist 7 Vertebrates .......................................................... 7 Phylum Chordata.................................................... 7 Invertebrates ......................................................... 12 Phylum Annelida.................................................... 12 Phylum Arthropoda .................................................. 13 Phylum Cnidaria.................................................... 31 Phylum Mollusca.................................................... 32 Phylum Platyhelminthes................................................ 32 Vascular Plants........................................................ 32 Division Tracheophyta................................................. 32 Bryophytes .......................................................... 45 Division Bryophyta................................................... 45 Fungi ............................................................. 49 Division Ascomycota.................................................. 49 Division Basidiomycota ................................................ 56 Division Chytridiomycota ............................................... 57 Division Myxomycota ................................................. 57 Unicellular Organisms.................................................... 57 Phylum Cercozoa.................................................... 57 Phylum Heterokonta.................................................. 57 Phylum Protozoa.................................................... 57 Extirpated species 59 Vertebrates .......................................................... 59 Phylum Chordata.................................................... 59 Vascular Plants........................................................ 59 Division Tracheophyta................................................. 59 Change log 61 References 63 Index 65 3 Introduction Purpose nasingham and Hebert, 2013). We have chosen not to fol- low the usual convention of italicizing genus and species A primary purpose for which the Kenai National Wildlife names because our current system does not enable us to Refuge was established in the Alaska National Interest handle accepted and provisional names separately. We want Lands Conservation Act of 1980 is, \to conserve fish and to avoid implying that any of the provisional names we wildlife populations and habitats in their natural diver- use are accepted by formatting them as proper scientific sity. ," where the term “fish and wildlife" is defined as names. Also, note that our database enforces lower case \any member of the animal kingdom, including without lim- letters in our specific epithets so that, for example, \Rab- itation any mammal, fish, bird. , amphibian, reptile, mol- dophaga sp. BOLD:ADA9342" becomes \Rabdophaga sp. lusk, crustacean, arthropod or other invertebrate." An obvi- bold:ada9342." ous first step toward accomplishing this purpose is to know In this draft we added handling of selected synonyms, what fish and wildlife, habitats, and natural diversity are to which are now included in the index. These synonymies do be conserved. This checklist is intended to be a frequently- not necessarily reflect our opinions and are not intended as updated document reflecting our current knowledge of which statements on correct taxonomy; we generally follow ITIS. living things call the Kenai National Wildlife Refuge home. Rather, synonymns are included in the index as an aid to the reader to help find taxa for which names may have changed. This list is dynamic and far from perfect with About the list many changes and corrections yet to be made. Please send comments and corrections to Matt Bowser at The present list includes a total of 1,952 species: 206 matt [email protected]. vertebrates, 681 invertebrates, 494 vascular plants, 181 bryophytes, 361 fungi, and 29 unicellular organisms. Of these, 1,861 are considered to be native, 87 species are con- Acknowledgments sidered to be non-native, and four species are represented by both native and non-native populations. In addition, 17 Many acknowledgments are due to many people who have non-native species are believed to have been extirpated from reviewed this list, provided identifications, and helped in the Refuge. other ways. The list below is by no means exhaustive. Since the last version of this list (Kenai National Wildlife Refuge biology staff, 2016) where 1,925 species were listed, James Bergdahl (Conservation Biology Center, Spokane, there has been a net change of 27 species added including Washington) reviewed and made helpful comments on the non-native species Oryctolagus cuniculus and Leontodon the Refuge's list of Carabidae. autumnalis. Two invertebrate phyla (Cnidaria and Platy- helminthes) have been added. See the change log (page 61) Peter Hovingh provided a list of leeches (Hirudinea) col- for details. lected on the Refuge. The list was produced from an in-house database using John Hudson (USFWS, Juneau, Alaska) provided lists of ITIS (http://www.itis.gov) for its taxonomic backbone. Odonata observed on the Refuge. Accordingly, names and hierarchies generally follow ITIS ex- cept where taxa are not represented in ITIS. Richard Payne (University of York, Heslington, UK) pro- Although accepted scientific names are used wherever vided a list of protists from Jigsaw Lake from Payne these are known, we have included provisional identifications et al.(2006). (for example, \Typhula sp.") where these represent the best information available. Species recognized only as molecu- David Wartinbee (retired from Kenai Peninsula College, lar operational taxonomic units are also included, mainly Soldotna, Alaska) shared a list of Chironomidae he had entities recognized by Barcode Index Numbers (BINs, Rat- collected on the Refuge. 5 Checklist of species occurring on the Kenai National Wildlife Refuge Vertebrates Common names: Dolly varden iNaturalist observations: 811997 Phylum Chordata Salvelinus namaycush Class Actinopterygii Common names: Lake trout Order Cypriniformes yThymallus arcticus Common names: Arctic grayling Family Catostomidae Order Scorpaeniformes Catostomus catostomus Common names: Longnose sucker Family Cottidae Literature records: Dean and Rickabough(2005), Friedersdorff Cottus aleuticus (1986), Friedersdorff and Jakubas(1984a), Friedersdorff and Jakubas Common names: Coastrange sculpin (1984b) Cottus cognatus Order Gasterosteiformes Common names: Slimy sculpin Family Gasterosteidae Class Amphibia Gasterosteus aculeatus Order Anura Common names: Threespine stickleback iNaturalist observations: 2138344 Family Ranidae Pungitius pungitius Lithobates sylvaticus : Tenspined stickleback Common names Synonyms: Rana sylvatica Common names: Wood frog Order Salmoniformes iNaturalist observations: 115158, 115166, 117220, 1816454 Family Salmonidae Class Aves Oncorhynchus gorbuscha Common names: Humpbacked salmon Order Accipitriformes Oncorhynchus keta Family Accipitridae Common names: Chum salmon Accipiter gentilis Oncorhynchus kisutch Common names: Northern goshawk Common names: Coho salmon or silver salmon iNaturalist observations: 114273 Oncorhynchus mykiss Accipiter striatus Common names: Steelhead Common names: Sharp-shinned hawk iNaturalist observations: 811982, 1814201 Aquila chrysaetos Oncorhynchus nerka Common names: Golden eagle Common names: Sockeye salmon or kokanee Buteo jamaicensis iNaturalist observations: 1021584 Common names: Red-tailed hawk Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Buteo lagopus Common names: Chinook salmon or king salmon Common names: Rough-legged hawk Prosopium cylindraceum Circus cyaneus Common names: Round whitefish Common names: Northern harrier Salvelinus alpinus Haliaeetus leucocephalus Common names: Arctic char Common names: Bald eagle Salvelinus malma iNaturalist observations: 353902, 2318743 7 8 REFUGE CHECKLIST Family Pandionidae Melanitta fusca Pandion haliaetus Common names: White-winged scoter Common names: Osprey Melanitta nigra iNaturalist observations: 17348 Common names: Black scoter Melanitta perspicillata Order Anseriformes Common names: Surf scoter Family Anatidae Mergus merganser Anas acuta Common names: Common merganser Common names: Northern pintail Mergus serrator Anas americana Common names: Red-breasted merganser iNaturalist observations: 1741201 Common names: American wigeon iNaturalist observations: 38971 Order Apodiformes Anas clypeata Common names: Northern shoveler Family Trochilidae Anas crecca Selasphorus rufus Common names: Green-winged
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Plant List Bristow Prairie & High Divide Trail
    *Non-native Bristow Prairie & High Divide Trail Plant List as of 7/12/2016 compiled by Tanya Harvey T24S.R3E.S33;T25S.R3E.S4 westerncascades.com FERNS & ALLIES Pseudotsuga menziesii Ribes lacustre Athyriaceae Tsuga heterophylla Ribes sanguineum Athyrium filix-femina Tsuga mertensiana Ribes viscosissimum Cystopteridaceae Taxaceae Rhamnaceae Cystopteris fragilis Taxus brevifolia Ceanothus velutinus Dennstaedtiaceae TREES & SHRUBS: DICOTS Rosaceae Pteridium aquilinum Adoxaceae Amelanchier alnifolia Dryopteridaceae Sambucus nigra ssp. caerulea Holodiscus discolor Polystichum imbricans (Sambucus mexicana, S. cerulea) Prunus emarginata (Polystichum munitum var. imbricans) Sambucus racemosa Rosa gymnocarpa Polystichum lonchitis Berberidaceae Rubus lasiococcus Polystichum munitum Berberis aquifolium (Mahonia aquifolium) Rubus leucodermis Equisetaceae Berberis nervosa Rubus nivalis Equisetum arvense (Mahonia nervosa) Rubus parviflorus Ophioglossaceae Betulaceae Botrychium simplex Rubus ursinus Alnus viridis ssp. sinuata Sceptridium multifidum (Alnus sinuata) Sorbus scopulina (Botrychium multifidum) Caprifoliaceae Spiraea douglasii Polypodiaceae Lonicera ciliosa Salicaceae Polypodium hesperium Lonicera conjugialis Populus tremuloides Pteridaceae Symphoricarpos albus Salix geyeriana Aspidotis densa Symphoricarpos mollis Salix scouleriana Cheilanthes gracillima (Symphoricarpos hesperius) Salix sitchensis Cryptogramma acrostichoides Celastraceae Salix sp. (Cryptogramma crispa) Paxistima myrsinites Sapindaceae Selaginellaceae (Pachystima myrsinites)
    [Show full text]
  • Fauna Lepidopterologica Volgo-Uralensis" 150 Years Later: Changes and Additions
    ©Ges. zur Förderung d. Erforschung von Insektenwanderungen e.V. München, download unter www.zobodat.at Atalanta (August 2000) 31 (1/2):327-367< Würzburg, ISSN 0171-0079 "Fauna lepidopterologica Volgo-Uralensis" 150 years later: changes and additions. Part 5. Noctuidae (Insecto, Lepidoptera) by Vasily V. A n ik in , Sergey A. Sachkov , Va d im V. Z o lo t u h in & A n drey V. Sv ir id o v received 24.II.2000 Summary: 630 species of the Noctuidae are listed for the modern Volgo-Ural fauna. 2 species [Mesapamea hedeni Graeser and Amphidrina amurensis Staudinger ) are noted from Europe for the first time and one more— Nycteola siculana Fuchs —from Russia. 3 species ( Catocala optata Godart , Helicoverpa obsoleta Fabricius , Pseudohadena minuta Pungeler ) are deleted from the list. Supposedly they were either erroneously determinated or incorrect noted from the region under consideration since Eversmann 's work. 289 species are recorded from the re­ gion in addition to Eversmann 's list. This paper is the fifth in a series of publications1 dealing with the composition of the pres­ ent-day fauna of noctuid-moths in the Middle Volga and the south-western Cisurals. This re­ gion comprises the administrative divisions of the Astrakhan, Volgograd, Saratov, Samara, Uljanovsk, Orenburg, Uralsk and Atyraus (= Gurjev) Districts, together with Tataria and Bash­ kiria. As was accepted in the first part of this series, only material reliably labelled, and cover­ ing the last 20 years was used for this study. The main collections are those of the authors: V. A n i k i n (Saratov and Volgograd Districts), S.
    [Show full text]
  • Translocation and Transport
    Glime, J. M. 2017. Nutrient Relations: Translocation and Transport. Chapt. 8-5. In: Glime, J. M. Bryophyte Ecology. Volume 1. 8-5-1 Physiological Ecology. Ebook sponsored by Michigan Technological University and the International Association of Bryologists. Last updated 17 July 2020 and available at <http://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/bryophyte-ecology/>. CHAPTER 8-5 NUTRIENT RELATIONS: TRANSLOCATION AND TRANSPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS Translocation and Transport ................................................................................................................................ 8-5-2 Movement from Older to Younger Tissues .................................................................................................. 8-5-6 Directional Differences ................................................................................................................................ 8-5-8 Species Differences ...................................................................................................................................... 8-5-8 Mechanisms of Transport .................................................................................................................................... 8-5-9 Source to Sink? ............................................................................................................................................ 8-5-9 Enrichment Effects ..................................................................................................................................... 8-5-10 Internal Transport
    [Show full text]
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • Insect Survey of Four Longleaf Pine Preserves
    A SURVEY OF THE MOTHS, BUTTERFLIES, AND GRASSHOPPERS OF FOUR NATURE CONSERVANCY PRESERVES IN SOUTHEASTERN NORTH CAROLINA Stephen P. Hall and Dale F. Schweitzer November 15, 1993 ABSTRACT Moths, butterflies, and grasshoppers were surveyed within four longleaf pine preserves owned by the North Carolina Nature Conservancy during the growing season of 1991 and 1992. Over 7,000 specimens (either collected or seen in the field) were identified, representing 512 different species and 28 families. Forty-one of these we consider to be distinctive of the two fire- maintained communities principally under investigation, the longleaf pine savannas and flatwoods. An additional 14 species we consider distinctive of the pocosins that occur in close association with the savannas and flatwoods. Twenty nine species appear to be rare enough to be included on the list of elements monitored by the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (eight others in this category have been reported from one of these sites, the Green Swamp, but were not observed in this study). Two of the moths collected, Spartiniphaga carterae and Agrotis buchholzi, are currently candidates for federal listing as Threatened or Endangered species. Another species, Hemipachnobia s. subporphyrea, appears to be endemic to North Carolina and should also be considered for federal candidate status. With few exceptions, even the species that seem to be most closely associated with savannas and flatwoods show few direct defenses against fire, the primary force responsible for maintaining these communities. Instead, the majority of these insects probably survive within this region due to their ability to rapidly re-colonize recently burned areas from small, well-dispersed refugia.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Common Native & Invasive Freshwater Plants in Alaska
    Introduction to Common Native & Potential Invasive Freshwater Plants in Alaska Cover photographs by (top to bottom, left to right): Tara Chestnut/Hannah E. Anderson, Jamie Fenneman, Vanessa Morgan, Dana Visalli, Jamie Fenneman, Lynda K. Moore and Denny Lassuy. Introduction to Common Native & Potential Invasive Freshwater Plants in Alaska This document is based on An Aquatic Plant Identification Manual for Washington’s Freshwater Plants, which was modified with permission from the Washington State Department of Ecology, by the Center for Lakes and Reservoirs at Portland State University for Alaska Department of Fish and Game US Fish & Wildlife Service - Coastal Program US Fish & Wildlife Service - Aquatic Invasive Species Program December 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments ............................................................................ x Introduction Overview ............................................................................. xvi How to Use This Manual .................................................... xvi Categories of Special Interest Imperiled, Rare and Uncommon Aquatic Species ..................... xx Indigenous Peoples Use of Aquatic Plants .............................. xxi Invasive Aquatic Plants Impacts ................................................................................. xxi Vectors ................................................................................. xxii Prevention Tips .................................................... xxii Early Detection and Reporting
    [Show full text]
  • 1307 Fungi Representing 1139 Infrageneric Taxa, 317 Genera and 66 Families ⇑ Jolanta Miadlikowska A, , Frank Kauff B,1, Filip Högnabba C, Jeffrey C
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 79 (2014) 132–168 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev A multigene phylogenetic synthesis for the class Lecanoromycetes (Ascomycota): 1307 fungi representing 1139 infrageneric taxa, 317 genera and 66 families ⇑ Jolanta Miadlikowska a, , Frank Kauff b,1, Filip Högnabba c, Jeffrey C. Oliver d,2, Katalin Molnár a,3, Emily Fraker a,4, Ester Gaya a,5, Josef Hafellner e, Valérie Hofstetter a,6, Cécile Gueidan a,7, Mónica A.G. Otálora a,8, Brendan Hodkinson a,9, Martin Kukwa f, Robert Lücking g, Curtis Björk h, Harrie J.M. Sipman i, Ana Rosa Burgaz j, Arne Thell k, Alfredo Passo l, Leena Myllys c, Trevor Goward h, Samantha Fernández-Brime m, Geir Hestmark n, James Lendemer o, H. Thorsten Lumbsch g, Michaela Schmull p, Conrad L. Schoch q, Emmanuël Sérusiaux r, David R. Maddison s, A. Elizabeth Arnold t, François Lutzoni a,10, Soili Stenroos c,10 a Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708-0338, USA b FB Biologie, Molecular Phylogenetics, 13/276, TU Kaiserslautern, Postfach 3049, 67653 Kaiserslautern, Germany c Botanical Museum, Finnish Museum of Natural History, FI-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland d Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, 358 ESC, 21 Sachem Street, New Haven, CT 06511, USA e Institut für Botanik, Karl-Franzens-Universität, Holteigasse 6, A-8010 Graz, Austria f Department of Plant Taxonomy and Nature Conservation, University of Gdan´sk, ul. Wita Stwosza 59, 80-308 Gdan´sk, Poland g Science and Education, The Field Museum, 1400 S.
    [Show full text]
  • Chlorantraniliprole: Reduced-Risk Insecticide for Controlling Insect Pests of Woody Ornamentals with Low Hazard to Bees
    242 Redmond and Potter: Acelepryn Control of Horticultural Pests Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 2017. 43(6):242–256 Chlorantraniliprole: Reduced-risk Insecticide for Controlling Insect Pests of Woody Ornamentals with Low Hazard to Bees Carl T. Redmond and Daniel A. Potter Abstract. Landscape professionals need target-selective insecticides for managing insect pests on flowering woody orna- mentals that may be visited by bees and other insect pollinators. Chlorantraniliprole, the first anthranilic diamide insec- ticide registered for use in urban landscapes, selectively targets the receptors that regulate the flow of calcium to control muscle contraction in caterpillars, plant-feeding beetles, and certain other phytophagous insects. Designated a reduced- risk pesticide by the United States Environmental Protection Agency, it has a favorable toxicological and environmental profile, including very low toxicity to bees and most types of predatory and parasitic insects that contribute to pest sup- pression. Chlorantraniliprole has become a mainstay for managing turfgrass pests, but little has been published concern- ing its performance against the pests of woody ornamentals. Researchers evaluated it against pests spanning five different orders: adult Japanese beetles, evergreen bagworm, eastern tent caterpillar, bristly roseslug sawfly, hawthorn lace bug, ole- ander aphid, boxwood psyllid, oak lecanium scale (crawlers), and boxwood leafminer, using real-world exposure scenarios. Chlorantraniliprole’s efficacy, speed of control, and residual activity as a foliar spray for the leaf-chewing pests was as good, or better, than provided by industry standards, but sprays were ineffective against the sucking pests (lace bugs, aphids, or scales). Basal soil drenches in autumn or spring failed to systemically control boxwood psyllids or leafminers, but autumn drenches did suppress roseslug damage and Japanese beetle feeding the following year.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hymenoptera of a Dry Meadow on Limestone
    POLISH JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY 47 1 29--47 1999 (Pol. J. Ecol.) W em er ULRICH Nicholas Copemicus University in Torun Department of Animal Ecology 87-100 Torun. Gagarina 9: Poland e-mail: ulrichw @ cc.uni.torun.pl 'I'HE HYMENOPTERA OF A DRY MEADOW ON LIMESTONE: SPECIES COMPOSITION, ABUNDANCE AND BIOMASS ABSTRACT: In 1986 and 1988 the hymenopterous fauna of a semixerophytic meadow on lime­ stone near Gottingen (FRG) was studied using ground-photo-eclectors. A total of 4982 specimens be­ longing to 475 different species \vere collected. Extrapolations from double-log functions revealed that there may be as many as 1330 parasitoid species present per year. 455 of the 475 species were parasito­ ids. 155 of them attack dipterans. 48 lepidopterans. 36 beetles. 23 wasps, 22 plant hoppers and 13 ap­ hids. 47 of the species are egg-parasitoids and parasitoids of miners. ectophytophages count for 44 of 2 the \V asp species. The abundance of the wasp fauna was rather high ( 1120 ± 53 in d. m- a- I ( 1986) and 2 1 335 ± 42 ind. m - a- ( 1988). Most abundant were the parasitoids of miners, gall-makers and the egg­ parasitoids. Compared \vith the high abundance the biomass was low. In 1986 the wasps weighed a total 2 1 2 1 of 194 ± 24 n1gDW m- a- and in 1988 only 69 ± 20 mgDW m- a- . The parasitoids of ectophytopha­ gous lepidopterans and coleopterans counted for n1ore than half of the whole biomass. KEY WORDS: Hymenoptera. parasitoids. faunal composition, density, biomass. species numbers, local extinction. 1. INTRODUCTION The insect order Hymenoptera is the species is very limited.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera of a Raised Bog and Adjacent Forest in Lithuania
    Eur. J. Entomol. 101: 63–67, 2004 ISSN 1210-5759 Lepidoptera of a raised bog and adjacent forest in Lithuania DALIUS DAPKUS Department of Zoology, Vilnius Pedagogical University, Studentų 39, LT–2004 Vilnius, Lithuania; e-mail: [email protected] Key words. Lepidoptera, tyrphobiontic and tyrphophilous species, communities, raised bog, wet forest, Lithuania Abstract. Studies on nocturnal Lepidoptera were carried out on the Laukėnai raised bog and the adjacent wet forest in 2001. Species composition and abundance were evaluated and compared. The species richness was much higher in the forest than at the bog. The core of each lepidopteran community was composed of 22 species with an abundance of higher than 1.0% of the total catch. Tyrpho- philous Hypenodes humidalis (22.0% of all individuals) and Nola aerugula (13.0%) were the dominant species in the raised bog community, while tyrphoneutral Pelosia muscerda (13.6%) and Eilema griseola (8.3%) were the most abundant species at the forest site. Five tyrphobiotic and nine tyrphophilous species made up 43.4% of the total catch on the bog, and three and seven species, respectively, at the forest site, where they made up 9.2% of all individuals. 59% of lepidopteran species recorded on the bog and 36% at the forest site were represented by less than five individuals. The species compositions of these communities showed a weak similarity. Habitat preferences of the tyrphobiontic and tyrphophilous species and dispersal of some of the species between the habi- tats are discussed. INTRODUCTION (1996). Ecological terminology is that of Mikkola & Spitzer (1983), Spitzer & Jaroš (1993), Spitzer (1994): tyrphobiontic The insect fauna of isolated raised bogs in Europe is species are species that are strongly associated with peat bogs, unique in having a considerable portion of relict boreal while tyrphophilous taxa are more abundant on bogs than in and subarctic species (Mikkola & Spitzer, 1983; Spitzer adjacent habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • DE TTK 1949 Taxonomy and Systematics of the Eurasian
    DE TTK 1949 Taxonomy and systematics of the Eurasian Craniophora Snellen, 1867 species (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae, Acronictinae) Az eurázsiai Craniophora Snellen, 1867 fajok taxonómiája és szisztematikája (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae, Acronictinae) PhD thesis Egyetemi doktori (PhD) értekezés Kiss Ádám Témavezető: Prof. Dr. Varga Zoltán DEBRECENI EGYETEM Természettudományi Doktori Tanács Juhász-Nagy Pál Doktori Iskola Debrecen, 2017. Ezen értekezést a Debreceni Egyetem Természettudományi Doktori Tanács Juhász-Nagy Pál Doktori Iskola Biodiverzitás programja keretében készítettem a Debreceni Egyetem természettudományi doktori (PhD) fokozatának elnyerése céljából. Debrecen, 2017. ………………………… Kiss Ádám Tanúsítom, hogy Kiss Ádám doktorjelölt 2011 – 2014. között a fent megnevezett Doktori Iskola Biodiverzitás programjának keretében irányításommal végezte munkáját. Az értekezésben foglalt eredményekhez a jelölt önálló alkotó tevékenységével meghatározóan hozzájárult. Az értekezés elfogadását javasolom. Debrecen, 2017. ………………………… Prof. Dr. Varga Zoltán A doktori értekezés betétlapja Taxonomy and systematics of the Eurasian Craniophora Snellen, 1867 species (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae, Acronictinae) Értekezés a doktori (Ph.D.) fokozat megszerzése érdekében a biológiai tudományágban Írta: Kiss Ádám okleveles biológus Készült a Debreceni Egyetem Juhász-Nagy Pál doktori iskolája (Biodiverzitás programja) keretében Témavezető: Prof. Dr. Varga Zoltán A doktori szigorlati bizottság: elnök: Prof. Dr. Dévai György tagok: Prof. Dr. Bakonyi Gábor Dr. Rácz István András
    [Show full text]
  • Nota Lepidopterologica
    ©Societas Europaea Lepidopterologica; download unter http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/ und www.zobodat.at Nota lepid. 14 (2) : 179-190 ; 30.IX.1991 ISSN 0342-7536 Some Japanese genera and species of the tribe Euliini (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae) Tosiro Yasuda* & Jözef Razowski** *College of Agriculture, University of Osaka Pref., 4-Cho Mozuumemachi, Sakai, Osaka, 591 Japan. **Institute of Systematics and Evolution of Animals, Polish Academy of Sciences, 17 Slawkowska, 31-016 Krakow, Poland. Summary Two Asiatic Euliini genera, Drachmobola Meyrick and Protopterna Meyrick are characterised, and two are described : Dicanticinta gen.n. (for Tortrix diticinctana Walsingham) and Minutargyrotoza gen.n. (for Capua minuta Walsingham). All their known species are discussed or mentioned, and one is described : Protopterna eremia sp.n. A preliminary note on the tribe Euliini and some data on its non-Palaearctic genera are given. Résumé Identification de deux genres asiatiques d'Euliini : Drachmobola Meyrick et Protopterna Meyrick, et description de deux genres nouveaux de cette tribu : Dicanticinta gen.n. (pour Tortrix diticinctana Walsingham) et Mi- nutargyrotoza gen.n. (pour Capua minuta Walsingham). Toutes les espèces connues de ces genres sont présentées ou mentionées, et une nouvelle espèces est décrite : Protopterna eremia sp.n. Note préliminaire sur la tribu Euliini, avec quelques renseignements sur ses genres non paléarctiques. Introduction Obraztsov (1965) placed the genera Drachmobola Meyrick and Protopterna Meyrick in the tribe Cnephasiini. Common (1963) included at least two Australian genera in that tribe and redescribed Drachmobola strigulata Meyrick. Diakonoff (1975) transferred Drachmobola to the Epitymbiini, describing in it one unrelated species. Kuznetsov & Stekolnikov (1977) erected in the Cochylini a new subtribe Euliina to comprise two genera, viz., Eulia Hübner and Pseudargyrotoza Obraztsov.
    [Show full text]