A Survey of Medicine Use in Children and Adolescents in Austria

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Survey of Medicine Use in Children and Adolescents in Austria A survey of medicine use in children and adolescents in Austria Doctoral thesis at the Medical University of Vienna for obtaining the academic degree Doctor of Medical Science Submitted by Mag. pharm. Elisabeth Rauch Supervisor: Univ. Prof. Dr. Christoph Male MSc Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine Waehringer Guertel 18-20 A-1090 Vienna Vienna, date of submission: 10/2016 DECLARATION This thesis project was realised at the Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Vienna. Study concept was prepared by Univ. Prof. Dr. Christoph Male MSc and Elisabeth Rauch. Data collection, analysis and interpretation as well as preparation of the original manuscript was done by Elisabeth Rauch under the supervision of Univ. Prof. Dr. Christoph Male MSc (Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Vienna) and the co-supervisors Univ. Prof. Dr. Harald Herkner (Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Vienna) and PD Dr. Florian Lagler (Paracelsus Medical University and Clinical Research Center Salzburg). Data amalgamating and statistical analysis was done with support of Ao. Univ. Prof. Mag. Dr. Walter Gall and his students at the Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics and Intelligent Systems (CeMSIIS), Section for Medical Information Management of the Medical University of Vienna. Further statistical support was given by Univ. Prof. Dr. Harald Herkner. The project was financially supported by the Austrian Paediatric Society. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................vi LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................vii ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................................ viii ZUSAMMENFASSUNG ........................................................................................................ix ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................................................xi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ....................................................................................................xii 1. GENERAL INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................13 1.1. Children as therapeutic orphans ..................................................................................13 1.2. Legal requirements and their impact on paediatric practice .........................................15 1.2.1. The EU Paediatric Regulation ...................................................................................15 1.2.2. Survey of all paediatric uses of medicinal products in Europe ...................................16 1.3. Evidence of medicine use in children ..........................................................................16 1.4. Status quo of paediatric medicine use in Austria .........................................................18 1.5. Rationale .....................................................................................................................18 2. OBJECTIVES OF THIS THESIS .................................................................................20 2.1. Primary objective .........................................................................................................20 2.2. Secondary objectives ..................................................................................................20 3. METHODS .......................................................................................................................21 3.1. ATC Coding.................................................................................................................21 3.2. Data sources ...............................................................................................................22 3.3. Paediatric medicine use in primary care setting ...........................................................22 3.3.1. Data collection ..........................................................................................................22 3.3.2. Data preparation and coding .....................................................................................24 3.3.3. Challenges and limitations ........................................................................................24 3.3.4. Data analysis ............................................................................................................24 3.4. Paediatric medicine use in hospital care setting ..........................................................25 3.4.1. Data collection ..........................................................................................................25 3.4.2. Data preparation and coding .....................................................................................26 3.4.3. Challenges and limitations ........................................................................................28 3.4.4. Data analysis ............................................................................................................28 3.5. Comparison of paediatric medicine use in primary versus hospital care setting ...........29 3.5.1. Data preparation and coding .....................................................................................29 3.5.2. Data analysis ............................................................................................................30 3.6. Evaluation of off-label use ...........................................................................................30 3.6.1. Definition of off label use ...........................................................................................31 3.6.2. Evaluation of off-label use (according to pre-defined criteria) ....................................32 3.7. Qualitative assessment of use .....................................................................................32 3.7.1. Interviews with selected primary care paediatricians in Vienna .................................32 iii 3.7.2. Analysis of qualitative prescription data regarding approval status ............................36 3.7.3. Analysis of qualitative prescription data in comparison to quantitative primary care data ......................................................................................................37 3.7.4. Variability of prescription habits .................................................................................37 4. RESULTS ........................................................................................................................38 4.1. Prescription frequency of medicines for children and adolescents in primary care setting .....................................................................................................38 4.1.1. Study population .......................................................................................................38 4.1.2. Prescription frequency on ATC level 1 (anatomical class) .........................................40 4.1.3. Prescription frequency on ATC level 2 (therapeutic class) ........................................45 4.1.4. Prescription frequency on ATC level 5 (chemical substance) ....................................49 4.1.5. Prescription frequency of anti-bacterials for systemic use in primary care .................54 4.2. Prescription frequency of medicines for children and adolescents in hospital care setting ....................................................................................................58 4.2.1. Study population / data coverage ..............................................................................58 4.2.2. Prescription frequency on ATC level 1 (anatomical class) .........................................59 4.2.3. Prescription frequency on ATC level 2 (therapeutic class) ........................................63 4.2.4. Prescription frequency on ATC level 5 (chemical substance) ....................................67 4.2.5. Prescription frequency of anti-bacterials for systemic use in hospital care ................71 4.3. Prescription frequency of medicines in primary care versus hospital care setting ........74 4.3.1. Comparison on ATC level 1 (anatomical class) .........................................................74 4.3.2. Comparison on ATC level 2 (therapeutic class) .........................................................76 4.3.3. Comparison on ATC level 5 (chemical substance) ....................................................79 4.3.4. Comparison of prescription frequency of anti-bacterials for systemic use..................80 4.4. Evaluation of licence status of medicines used in children and adolescents ................81 4.4.1. Off-label use in primary care setting ..........................................................................81 4.4.2. Off-label use in hospital care setting .........................................................................82 4.5. Qualitative assessment of medicine use in children and adolescents ..........................85 4.5.1. Qualitative assessment of prescription habits by interview ........................................85 4.5.2. Evaluation of off-label use (based on interviews) ......................................................88 4.5.3. Comparison of qualitative data based on interviews to quantitative data obtained from reimbursement institutions
Recommended publications
  • WO 2015/179249 Al 26 November 2015 (26.11.2015) P O P C T
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2015/179249 Al 26 November 2015 (26.11.2015) P O P C T (51) International Patent Classification: (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every C12N 15/11 (2006.01) A61K 38/08 (2006.01) kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, C12N 15/00 (2006.01) AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BN, BR, BW, BY, BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, (21) Number: International Application DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, PCT/US2015/031213 HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JP, KE, KG, KN, KP, KR, (22) International Filing Date: KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, MG, 15 May 2015 (15.05.2015) MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, OM, PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SA, SC, (25) Filing Language: English SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, (26) Publication Language: English TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW. (30) Priority Data: (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every 62/000,43 1 19 May 2014 (19.05.2014) US kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, 62/129,746 6 March 2015 (06.03.2015) US GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, RW, SD, SL, ST, SZ, TZ, UG, ZM, ZW), Eurasian (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, RU, (72) Inventors; and TJ, TM), European (AL, AT, BE, BG, CH, CY, CZ, DE, (71) Applicants : GELLER, Bruce, L.
    [Show full text]
  • Nature, Frequency and Determinants of Prescription Modifications in Dutch
    Nature, frequency and determinants of prescription modi®cations in Dutch community pharmacies Henk Buurma,1,3 Peter A. G. M. de Smet,2,5 Olga P. van den Hoff2 & Antoine C. G. Egberts3,4 1SIR Institute for Pharmacy Practice Research, Leiden, 2WINAp (Scienti®c Institute Dutch Pharmacists), The Hague, 3Department of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacotherapy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Utrecht, 4Hospital pharmacy `Midden-Brabant', TweeSteden Hospital and St Elisabeth Hospital, Tilburg and 5Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University Hospital Nijmegen, The Netherlands Aims To examine the nature, frequency and determinants of prescription modi®cations in Dutch community pharmacies. Methods A prospective case-control study comparing modi®ed prescriptions with nonmodi®ed prescriptions was carried out in 141 Dutch community pharmacies. 2014 modi®ed prescriptions (cases), collected in the selected pharmacies on a predetermined day in a speci®c period (25th February until 12th March 1999) and 2581 nonmodi®ed prescriptions (controls) randomly selected on the same day were studied. The nature and frequency of prescription modi®cations and patient, drug and prescriber related determinants for a modi®ed prescription were assessed. Results The overall incidence of prescription modi®cations was 4.3%, with a mean of 14.3 modi®cations per pharmacy per day. For prescription only medicines (POM) the incidence was 4.9%. The majority of POM modi®cations concerned a clari®cation (71.8%). In 22.2% a prescription could potentially have had clinical consequences when not altered; in more than half of the latter it concerned a dose error (13.7% of all cases). POM prescriptions of patients of 40±65 years had a signi®cantly lower chance of modi®cation compared with those of younger people (OR=0.74 [0.64±0.86]).
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmacokinetic Drug–Drug Interactions Among Antiepileptic Drugs, Including CBD, Drugs Used to Treat COVID-19 and Nutrients
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Pharmacokinetic Drug–Drug Interactions among Antiepileptic Drugs, Including CBD, Drugs Used to Treat COVID-19 and Nutrients Marta Kara´zniewicz-Łada 1 , Anna K. Główka 2 , Aniceta A. Mikulska 1 and Franciszek K. Główka 1,* 1 Department of Physical Pharmacy and Pharmacokinetics, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-781 Pozna´n,Poland; [email protected] (M.K.-Ł.); [email protected] (A.A.M.) 2 Department of Bromatology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-354 Pozna´n,Poland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +48-(0)61-854-64-37 Abstract: Anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) are an important group of drugs of several generations, rang- ing from the oldest phenobarbital (1912) to the most recent cenobamate (2019). Cannabidiol (CBD) is increasingly used to treat epilepsy. The outbreak of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in 2019 created new challenges in the effective treatment of epilepsy in COVID-19 patients. The purpose of this review is to present data from the last few years on drug–drug interactions among of AEDs, as well as AEDs with other drugs, nutrients and food. Literature data was collected mainly in PubMed, as well as google base. The most important pharmacokinetic parameters of the chosen 29 AEDs, mechanism of action and clinical application, as well as their biotransformation, are presented. We pay a special attention to the new potential interactions of the applied first-generation AEDs (carba- Citation: Kara´zniewicz-Łada,M.; mazepine, oxcarbazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital and primidone), on decreased concentration Główka, A.K.; Mikulska, A.A.; of some medications (atazanavir and remdesivir), or their compositions (darunavir/cobicistat and Główka, F.K.
    [Show full text]
  • B-Lactams: Chemical Structure, Mode of Action and Mechanisms of Resistance
    b-Lactams: chemical structure, mode of action and mechanisms of resistance Ru´ben Fernandes, Paula Amador and Cristina Prudeˆncio This synopsis summarizes the key chemical and bacteriological characteristics of b-lactams, penicillins, cephalosporins, carbanpenems, monobactams and others. Particular notice is given to first-generation to fifth-generation cephalosporins. This review also summarizes the main resistance mechanism to antibiotics, focusing particular attention to those conferring resistance to broad-spectrum cephalosporins by means of production of emerging cephalosporinases (extended-spectrum b-lactamases and AmpC b-lactamases), target alteration (penicillin-binding proteins from methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus) and membrane transporters that pump b-lactams out of the bacterial cell. Keywords: b-lactams, chemical structure, mechanisms of resistance, mode of action Historical perspective Alexander Fleming first noticed the antibacterial nature of penicillin in 1928. When working with Antimicrobials must be understood as any kind of agent another bacteriological problem, Fleming observed with inhibitory or killing properties to a microorganism. a contaminated culture of Staphylococcus aureus with Antibiotic is a more restrictive term, which implies the the mold Penicillium notatum. Fleming remarkably saw natural source of the antimicrobial agent. Similarly, under- the potential of this unfortunate event. He dis- lying the term chemotherapeutic is the artificial origin of continued the work that he was dealing with and was an antimicrobial agent by chemical synthesis [1]. Initially, able to describe the compound around the mold antibiotics were considered as small molecular weight and isolates it. He named it penicillin and published organic molecules or metabolites used in response of his findings along with some applications of penicillin some microorganisms against others that inhabit the same [4].
    [Show full text]
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2010/014.3507 A1 Gant Et Al
    US 2010.0143507A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2010/014.3507 A1 Gant et al. (43) Pub. Date: Jun. 10, 2010 (54) CARBOXYLIC ACID INHIBITORS OF Publication Classification HISTONE DEACETYLASE, GABA (51) Int. Cl. TRANSAMINASE AND SODIUM CHANNEL A633/00 (2006.01) A 6LX 3/553 (2006.01) A 6LX 3/553 (2006.01) (75) Inventors: Thomas G. Gant, Carlsbad, CA A63L/352 (2006.01) (US); Sepehr Sarshar, Cardiff by A6II 3/19 (2006.01) the Sea, CA (US) C07C 53/128 (2006.01) A6IP 25/06 (2006.01) A6IP 25/08 (2006.01) Correspondence Address: A6IP 25/18 (2006.01) GLOBAL PATENT GROUP - APX (52) U.S. Cl. .................... 424/722:514/211.13: 514/221; 10411 Clayton Road, Suite 304 514/456; 514/557; 562/512 ST. LOUIS, MO 63131 (US) (57) ABSTRACT Assignee: AUSPEX The present invention relates to new carboxylic acid inhibi (73) tors of histone deacetylase, GABA transaminase, and/or PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Sodium channel activity, pharmaceutical compositions Vista, CA (US) thereof, and methods of use thereof. (21) Appl. No.: 12/632,507 Formula I (22) Filed: Dec. 7, 2009 Related U.S. Application Data (60) Provisional application No. 61/121,024, filed on Dec. 9, 2008. US 2010/014.3507 A1 Jun. 10, 2010 CARBOXYLIC ACID INHIBITORS OF HISTONE DEACETYLASE, GABA TRANSAMNASE AND SODIUM CHANNEL 0001. This application claims the benefit of priority of Valproic acid U.S. provisional application No. 61/121,024, filed Dec. 9, 2008, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by ref 0004 Valproic acid is extensively metabolised via erence as if written herein in its entirety.
    [Show full text]
  • Penicillin Allergy Guidance Document
    Penicillin Allergy Guidance Document Key Points Background Careful evaluation of antibiotic allergy and prior tolerance history is essential to providing optimal treatment The true incidence of penicillin hypersensitivity amongst patients in the United States is less than 1% Alterations in antibiotic prescribing due to reported penicillin allergy has been shown to result in higher costs, increased risk of antibiotic resistance, and worse patient outcomes Cross-reactivity between truly penicillin allergic patients and later generation cephalosporins and/or carbapenems is rare Evaluation of Penicillin Allergy Obtain a detailed history of allergic reaction Classify the type and severity of the reaction paying particular attention to any IgE-mediated reactions (e.g., anaphylaxis, hives, angioedema, etc.) (Table 1) Evaluate prior tolerance of beta-lactam antibiotics utilizing patient interview or the electronic medical record Recommendations for Challenging Penicillin Allergic Patients See Figure 1 Follow-Up Document tolerance or intolerance in the patient’s allergy history Consider referring to allergy clinic for skin testing Created July 2017 by Macey Wolfe, PharmD; John Schoen, PharmD, BCPS; Scott Bergman, PharmD, BCPS; Sara May, MD; and Trevor Van Schooneveld, MD, FACP Disclaimer: This resource is intended for non-commercial educational and quality improvement purposes. Outside entities may utilize for these purposes, but must acknowledge the source. The guidance is intended to assist practitioners in managing a clinical situation but is not mandatory. The interprofessional group of authors have made considerable efforts to ensure the information upon which they are based is accurate and up to date. Any treatments have some inherent risk. Recommendations are meant to improve quality of patient care yet should not replace clinical judgment.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapport 2008
    rapport 2008 Reseptregisteret 2004-2007 The Norwegian Prescription Database 2004-2007 Marit Rønning Christian Lie Berg Kari Furu Irene Litleskare Solveig Sakshaug Hanne Strøm Rapport 2008 Nasjonalt folkehelseinstitutt/ The Norwegian Institute of Public Health Tittel/Title: Reseptregisteret 2004-2007 The Norwegian Prescription Database 2004-2007 Redaktør/Editor: Marit Rønning Forfattere/Authors: Christian Lie Berg Kari Furu Irene Litleskare Marit Rønning Solveig Sakshaug Hanne Strøm Publisert av/Published by: Nasjonalt folkehelseinstitutt Postboks 4404 Nydalen NO-0403 Norway Tel: + 47 21 07 70 00 E-mail: [email protected] www.fhi.no Design: Per Kristian Svendsen Layout: Grete Søimer Acknowledgement: Julie D.W. Johansen (English version) Forsideillustrasjon/Front page illustration: Colourbox.com Trykk/Print: Nordberg Trykk AS Opplag/ Number printed: 1200 Bestilling/Order: [email protected] Fax: +47-21 07 81 05 Tel: +47-21 07 82 00 ISSN: 0332-6535 ISBN: 978-82-8082-252-9 trykt utgave/printed version ISBN: 978-82-8082-253-6 elektronisk utgave/electronic version 2 Rapport 2008 • Folkehelseinstituttet Forord Bruken av legemidler i befolkningen er økende. En viktig målsetting for norsk legemiddelpolitikk er rasjonell legemiddelbruk. En forutsetning for arbeidet med å optimalisere legemiddelbruken i befolkningen er kunnskap om hvilke legemidler som brukes, hvem som bruker legemidlene og hvordan de brukes. For å få bedre kunnskap på dette området, vedtok Stortinget i desember 2002 å etablere et nasjonalt reseptbasert legemiddelregister (Reseptregisteret). Oppgaven med å etablere registeret ble gitt til Folkehelseinstituttet som fra 1. januar 2004 har mottatt månedlige opplysninger fra alle apotek om utlevering av legemidler til pasienter, leger og institusjoner. Denne rapporten er første utgave i en planlagt årlig statistikk fra Reseptregisteret.
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand Data Sheet 1 Avaxim Suspension for Injection 2 Qualitative and Quantitative Composition 3 Pharmaceutical Form 4 Clin
    NEW ZEALAND DATA SHEET 1 AVAXIM SUSPENSION FOR INJECTION Hepatitis A virus (inactivated, adsorbed) 2 QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE COMPOSITION Avaxim is a sterile suspension for injection containing formaldehyde-inactivated hepatitis A virus (GBM strain) adsorbed onto aluminium hydroxide. Each 0.5mL dose contains: Active ingredient: Hepatitis A virus* ………………………………………………160 antigen units** * GBM strain cultured on MRC-5 human diploid cells. MRC-5 is a cell line that was derived from human embryonic lung tissue in the 1960s. ** In the absence of an international standardised reference, the antigen content is expressed using an in-house reference. The manufacture of this product includes exposure to bovine derived materials. No evidence exists that any case of vCJD (considered to be the human form of bovine spongiform encephalopathy) has resulted from the administration of any vaccine product. Contains phenylalanine and residual neomycin. For the full list of excipients, see Section 6.1 List of excipients. 3 PHARMACEUTICAL FORM Suspension for injection Avaxim is a cloudy, whitish suspension. 4 CLINICAL PARTICULARS 4.1 THERAPEUTIC INDICATIONS Avaxim is indicated for active immunisation against hepatitis A infection in adults and children 2 years and over. Vaccination against viral hepatitis A is recommended for individuals who are or will be at increased risk of infection: • travellers to areas of moderate or high endemicity for hepatitis A Property of the Sanofi group - strictly confidential ava-ccdsv10-dsv5-24may21 Page 1 • visitors to rural and remote indigenous communities • child day-care and pre-school personnel • the intellectually disabled and their carers • health care providers • sewerage workers • men who have sex with men • injecting drug users • patients with chronic liver disease • haemophiliacs who may receive pooled plasma concentrates 4.2 DOSE AND METHOD OF ADMINISTRATION The dose is 0.5 mL for each injection.
    [Show full text]
  • Computational Antibiotics Book
    Andrew V DeLong, Jared C Harris, Brittany S Larcart, Chandler B Massey, Chelsie D Northcutt, Somuayiro N Nwokike, Oscar A Otieno, Harsh M Patel, Mehulkumar P Patel, Pratik Pravin Patel, Eugene I Rowell, Brandon M Rush, Marc-Edwin G Saint-Louis, Amy M Vardeman, Felicia N Woods, Giso Abadi, Thomas J. Manning Computational Antibiotics Valdosta State University is located in South Georgia. Computational Antibiotics Index • Computational Details and Website Access (p. 8) • Acknowledgements (p. 9) • Dedications (p. 11) • Antibiotic Historical Introduction (p. 13) Introduction to Antibiotic groups • Penicillin’s (p. 21) • Carbapenems (p. 22) • Oxazolidines (p. 23) • Rifamycin (p. 24) • Lincosamides (p. 25) • Quinolones (p. 26) • Polypeptides antibiotics (p. 27) • Glycopeptide Antibiotics (p. 28) • Sulfonamides (p. 29) • Lipoglycopeptides (p. 30) • First Generation Cephalosporins (p. 31) • Cephalosporin Third Generation (p. 32) • Fourth-Generation Cephalosporins (p. 33) • Fifth Generation Cephalosporin’s (p. 34) • Tetracycline antibiotics (p. 35) Computational Antibiotics Antibiotics Covered (in alphabetical order) Amikacin (p. 36) Cefempidone (p. 98) Ceftizoxime (p. 159) Amoxicillin (p. 38) Cefepime (p. 100) Ceftobiprole (p. 161) Ampicillin (p. 40) Cefetamet (p. 102) Ceftoxide (p. 163) Arsphenamine (p. 42) Cefetrizole (p. 104) Ceftriaxone (p. 165) Azithromycin (p.44) Cefivitril (p. 106) Cefuracetime (p. 167) Aziocillin (p. 46) Cefixime (p. 108) Cefuroxime (p. 169) Aztreonam (p.48) Cefmatilen ( p. 110) Cefuzonam (p. 171) Bacampicillin (p. 50) Cefmetazole (p. 112) Cefalexin (p. 173) Bacitracin (p. 52) Cefodizime (p. 114) Chloramphenicol (p.175) Balofloxacin (p. 54) Cefonicid (p. 116) Cilastatin (p. 177) Carbenicillin (p. 56) Cefoperazone (p. 118) Ciprofloxacin (p. 179) Cefacetrile (p. 58) Cefoselis (p. 120) Clarithromycin (p. 181) Cefaclor (p.
    [Show full text]
  • Elif Fatma Sen BW.Indd
    Use and Safety of Respiratory Medicines in Children E. F. Şen EEliflif FFatmaatma SSenen BBW.inddW.indd 1 003-01-113-01-11 115:175:17 The work presented in this thesis was conducted at the Department of Medical Informatics of the Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam. The research reported in thesis was funded by the European Community’s 6th Framework Programme. Project number LSHB-CT-2005-005216: TEDDY: Task force in Europe for Drug Development for the Young. The contributions of the participating primary care physicians in the IPCI, Pedianet and IMS-DA project are greatly acknowledged. Financial support for printing this thesis was kindly provided by the department of Medical Informatics – Integrated Primary Care Information (IPCI) project of the Erasmus University Medi- cal Center; and by the J.E. Jurriaanse Stichting in Rotterdam. Cover: Optima Grafi sche Communicatie Printed by: Optima Grafi sche Communicatie Elif Fatma Şen Use and Safety of Respiratory medicines in Children ISBN: 978-94-6169-003-6 © E.F. Şen, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, 2011. All rights reserved. No part of this thesis may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, without prior written permission of the holder of the copyright. EEliflif FFatmaatma SSenen BBW.inddW.indd 2 003-01-113-01-11 115:175:17 Use and Safety of Respiratory Medicines in Children Het gebruik en de bijwerkingen van respiratoire medicijnen in kinderen Proefschrift Ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam op gezag van de rector magnifi cus Prof.dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Safety and Efficacy of Antiviral Therapy for Prevention of Cytomegalovirus Reactivation in Immunocompetent Critically Ill Patien
    1 2 3 PROJECT TITLE 4 Anti-viral Prophylaxis for Prevention of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Reactivation in Immunocompetent 5 Patients in Critical Care 6 7 STUDY ACRONYM 8 Cytomegalovirus Control in Critical Care - CCCC 9 10 APPLICANTS 11 Dr Nicholas Cowley 12 Specialty Registrar Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Intensive Care Research Fellow 13 Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham 14 15 Professor Paul Moss 16 Professor of Haematology 17 Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham 18 19 Professor Julian Bion 20 Professor of Intensive Care Medicine 21 Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham 22 23 Trial Virologist Trial Statistician 24 Dr H Osman Dr P G Nightingale 25 Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham University of Birmingham CCCC CMV Protocol V1.7, 18th September 2013 1 Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ on 09/23/2021 26 CONTENTS 27 Substantial Amendment Sept 18th 2013 4 28 1 SUMMARY OF TRIAL DESIGN .......................................................................................................... 5 29 2 QEHB ICU Duration of Patient Stay ................................................................................................. 6 30 3 SCHEMA - QEHB PATIENT NUMBERS AVAILABLE FOR RECRUITMENT ........................................... 6 31 4 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 7 32 4.1 CMV latent infection is widespread ........................................................................................ 7 33 4.2 CMV Reactivation
    [Show full text]
  • Estonian Statistics on Medicines 2016 1/41
    Estonian Statistics on Medicines 2016 ATC code ATC group / Active substance (rout of admin.) Quantity sold Unit DDD Unit DDD/1000/ day A ALIMENTARY TRACT AND METABOLISM 167,8985 A01 STOMATOLOGICAL PREPARATIONS 0,0738 A01A STOMATOLOGICAL PREPARATIONS 0,0738 A01AB Antiinfectives and antiseptics for local oral treatment 0,0738 A01AB09 Miconazole (O) 7088 g 0,2 g 0,0738 A01AB12 Hexetidine (O) 1951200 ml A01AB81 Neomycin+ Benzocaine (dental) 30200 pieces A01AB82 Demeclocycline+ Triamcinolone (dental) 680 g A01AC Corticosteroids for local oral treatment A01AC81 Dexamethasone+ Thymol (dental) 3094 ml A01AD Other agents for local oral treatment A01AD80 Lidocaine+ Cetylpyridinium chloride (gingival) 227150 g A01AD81 Lidocaine+ Cetrimide (O) 30900 g A01AD82 Choline salicylate (O) 864720 pieces A01AD83 Lidocaine+ Chamomille extract (O) 370080 g A01AD90 Lidocaine+ Paraformaldehyde (dental) 405 g A02 DRUGS FOR ACID RELATED DISORDERS 47,1312 A02A ANTACIDS 1,0133 Combinations and complexes of aluminium, calcium and A02AD 1,0133 magnesium compounds A02AD81 Aluminium hydroxide+ Magnesium hydroxide (O) 811120 pieces 10 pieces 0,1689 A02AD81 Aluminium hydroxide+ Magnesium hydroxide (O) 3101974 ml 50 ml 0,1292 A02AD83 Calcium carbonate+ Magnesium carbonate (O) 3434232 pieces 10 pieces 0,7152 DRUGS FOR PEPTIC ULCER AND GASTRO- A02B 46,1179 OESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE (GORD) A02BA H2-receptor antagonists 2,3855 A02BA02 Ranitidine (O) 340327,5 g 0,3 g 2,3624 A02BA02 Ranitidine (P) 3318,25 g 0,3 g 0,0230 A02BC Proton pump inhibitors 43,7324 A02BC01 Omeprazole
    [Show full text]