DOCSLIB.ORG

Amendment No. 1 to Registry Agreement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Amendment No. 1 to Registry Agreement Amendment No. 1 to Registry Agreement The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers and Sener Ingeniería y Sistemas, S.A. agree, effective as of _______________________________ (“Amendment No. 1 Effective Date”), that the modification set forth below is made to the 24 October 2014 .sener Registry Agreement between the parties (“Agreement”). The parties hereby agree to amend Exhibit A by deleting the following subsection under the section entitled “Internationalized Domain Names (IDNs)” in its entirety: 3.3. Registry Operator may offer registration of IDNs in the following languages/scripts (IDN Tables and IDN Registration Rules will be published by the Registry Operator as specified in the ICANN IDN Implementation Guidelines): 3.3.1. Polish language 3.3.2. Spanish language 3.3.3. French language” The parties hereby further agree to amend Exhibit A by replacing the deleted subsection above with new text as a new section 3.3: 3.3. Registry Operator may offer registration of IDNs in the following languages/scripts (IDN Tables and IDN Registration Rules will be published by the Registry Operator as specified in the ICANN IDN Implementation Guidelines): 3.3.1. Arabic script 3.3.2. Armenian script 3.3.3. Avestan script 3.3.4. Azerbaijani language 3.3.5. Balinese script 3.3.6. Bamum script 3.3.7. BataK script 3.3.8. Belarusian language 3.3.9. Bengali script 3.3.10. Bopomofo script 3.3.11. Brahmi script 3.3.12. Buginese script 3.3.13. Buhid script 3.3.14. Bulgarian language 3.3.15. Canadian Aboriginal script 3.3.16. Carian script 3.3.17. Cham script 3.3.18. Cherokee script 3.3.19. Chinese language 3.3.20. Coptic script 3.3.21. Croatian language 3.3.22. Cuneiform script 3.3.23. Cyrillic script 3.3.24. Devanagari script 3.3.25. Egyptian Hieroglyphs script 3.3.26. Ethiopic script 3.3.27. French language 3.3.28. Georgian script 3.3.29. Glagolitic script 3.3.30. GreeK script 3.3.31. GreeK, Modern language 3.3.32. Gujarati script 3.3.33. GurmuKhi script 3.3.34. Han script 3.3.35. Hangul script 3.3.36. Hanunoo script 3.3.37. Hebrew script 3.3.38. Hiragana script 3.3.39. Imperial Aramaic script 3.3.40. Inscriptional Pahlavi script 3.3.41. Inscriptional Parthian script 3.3.42. Japanese language 3.3.43. Javanese script 3.3.44. Kaithi script 3.3.45. Kannada script 3.3.46. KataKana script 3.3.47. Kayah Li script 3.3.48. Kharoshthi script 3.3.49. Khmer script 3.3.50. Korean language 3.3.51. Kurdish language 3.3.52. Lao script 3.3.53. Latin script 3.3.54. Lepcha script 3.3.55. Limbu script 3.3.56. Lisu script 3.3.57. Lycian script 3.3.58. Lydian script 3.3.59. Macedonian language 3.3.60. Malayalam script 3.3.61. Mandaic script 3.3.62. Meitei MayeK script 3.3.63. Moldavian language 3.3.64. Mongolian script 3.3.65. Myanmar script 3.3.66. New Tai Lue script 3.3.67. Nko script 3.3.68. Ogham script 3.3.69. Ol ChiKi script 3.3.70. Old Persian script 3.3.71. Old South Arabian script 3.3.72. Old TurKic script 3.3.73. Oriya script 3.3.74. Phags Pa script 3.3.75. Phoenician script 3.3.76. Polish language 3.3.77. Rejang script 3.3.78. Runic script 3.3.79. Russian language 3.3.80. Samaritan script 3.3.81. Saurashtra script 3.3.82. Serbian language 3.3.83. Sinhala script 3.3.84. Spanish language 3.3.85. Sundanese script 3.3.86. Swedish language 3.3.87. Syloti Nagri script 3.3.88. Syriac script 3.3.89. Tagalog script 3.3.90. Tagbanwa script 3.3.91. Tai Le script 3.3.92. Tai Tham script 3.3.93. Tai Viet script 3.3.94. Tamil script 3.3.95. Telugu script 3.3.96. Thaana script 3.3.97. Thai script 3.3.98. Tibetan script 3.3.99. Tifinagh script 3.3.100. Ukrainian language 3.3.101. Vai script 3.3.102. Yi script The parties agree that, except as set forth in this Amendment, the current terms and conditions of the Agreement will remain in full force and effect. All capitalized terms not defined will have the meaning given to them in the Agreement. ACCEPTED AND AGREED: INTERNET CORPORATION FOR ASSIGNED NAMES AND NUMBERS By: _____________________________ Akram Atallah President, Global Domains Division SENER INGENIERÍA Y SISTEMAS, S.A. By: _____________________________ Ignacio Guerra Gimeno Secretary .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Register in Eastern Cham: Phonological, Phonetic and Sociolinguistic Approaches
    REGISTER IN EASTERN CHAM: PHONOLOGICAL, PHONETIC AND SOCIOLINGUISTIC APPROACHES A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Marc Brunelle August 2005 © 2005 Marc Brunelle REGISTER IN EASTERN CHAM: PHONOLOGICAL, PHONETIC AND SOCIOLINGUISTIC APPROACHES Marc Brunelle, Ph.D. Cornell University, 2005 The Chamic language family is often cited as a test case for contact linguistics. Although Chamic languages are Austronesian, they are claimed to have converged with Mon-Khmer languages and adopted features from their closest neighbors. A good example of such a convergence is the realization of phonological register in Cham dialects. In many Southeast Asian languages, the loss of the voicing contrast in onsets has led to the development of two registers, bundles of features that initially included pitch, voice quality, vowel quality and durational differences and that are typically realized on rimes. While Cambodian Cham realizes register mainly through vowel quality, just like Khmer, the registers of the Cham dialect spoken in south- central Vietnam (Eastern Cham) are claimed to have evolved into tone, a property that plays a central role in Vietnamese phonology. This dissertation evaluates the hypothesis that contact with Vietnamese is responsible for the recent evolution of Eastern Cham register by exploring the nature of the sound system of Eastern Cham from phonetic, phonological and sociolinguistic perspectives. Proponents of the view that Eastern Cham has a complex tone system claim that tones arose from the phonemicization of register allophones conditioned by codas after the weakening or deletion of coda stops and laryngeals.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous Cultures of Southeast Asia: Language, Religion & Sociopolitical Issues
    Indigenous Cultures of Southeast Asia: Language, Religion & Sociopolitical Issues Eric Kendrick Georgia Perimeter College Indigenous vs. Minorities • Indigenous groups are minorities • Not all minorities are indigenous . e.g. Chinese in SE Asia Hmong, Hà Giang Province, Northeast Vietnam No Definitive Definition Exists • Historical ties to a particular territory • Cultural distinctiveness from other groups • Vulnerable to exploitation and marginalization by colonizers or dominant ethnic groups • The right to self-Identification Scope • 70+ countries • 300 - 350 million (6%) • 4,000 – 5,000 distinct peoples • Few dozen to several hundred thousand Some significantly exposed to colonizing or expansionary activities Others comparatively isolated from external or modern influence Post-Colonial Developments • Modern society has encroached on territory, diminishing languages & cultures • Many have become assimilated or urbanized Categories • Pastoralists – Herd animals for food, clothing, shelter, trade – Nomadic or Semi-nomadic – Common in Africa • Hunter-Gatherers – Game, fish, birds, insects, fruits – Medicine, stimulants, poison – Common in Amazon • Farmers – Small scale, nothing left for trade – Supplemented with hunting, fishing, gathering – Highlands of South America Commonly-known Examples • Native Americans (Canada – First Nations people) • Inuit (Eskimos) • Native Hawaiians • Maori (New Zealand) • Aborigines (Australia) Indigenous Peoples Southeast Asia Mainland SE Asia (Indochina) • Vietnam – 53 / 10 M (14%) • Cambodia – 24 / 197,000
    [Show full text]
  • (RSEP) Request October 16, 2017 Registry Operator INFIBEAM INCORPORATION LIMITED 9Th Floor
    Registry Services Evaluation Policy (RSEP) Request October 16, 2017 Registry Operator INFIBEAM INCORPORATION LIMITED 9th Floor, A-Wing Gopal Palace, NehruNagar Ahmedabad, Gujarat 380015 Request Details Case Number: 00874461 This service request should be used to submit a Registry Services Evaluation Policy (RSEP) request. An RSEP is required to add, modify or remove Registry Services for a TLD. More information about the process is available at https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/rsep-2014- 02-19-en Complete the information requested below. All answers marked with a red asterisk are required. Click the Save button to save your work and click the Submit button to submit to ICANN. PROPOSED SERVICE 1. Name of Proposed Service Removal of IDN Languages for .OOO 2. Technical description of Proposed Service. If additional information needs to be considered, attach one PDF file Infibeam Incorporation Limited (“infibeam”) the Registry Operator for the .OOO TLD, intends to change its Registry Service Provider for the .OOO TLD to CentralNic Limited. Accordingly, Infibeam seeks to remove the following IDN languages from Exhibit A of the .OOO New gTLD Registry Agreement: - Armenian script - Avestan script - Azerbaijani language - Balinese script - Bamum script - Batak script - Belarusian language - Bengali script - Bopomofo script - Brahmi script - Buginese script - Buhid script - Bulgarian language - Canadian Aboriginal script - Carian script - Cham script - Cherokee script - Coptic script - Croatian language - Cuneiform script - Devanagari script
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Hamptonese Using Hidden Markov Models
    An Analysis of Hamptonese Using Hidden Markov Models Ethan Le Dr. Mark Stamp Undergraduate Assistant Professor Department of Computer Science Department of Computer Science San Jose State University San Jose State University San Jose, CA, U.S.A. San Jose, CA, U.S.A. Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] An Analysis of Hamptonese Using Hidden Markov Models Le and Stamp Table of Contents Section Page 1. Introduction 5 of 54 1.1. James Hampton 5 of 54 2. Purpose 7 of 54 3. What is Hamptonese? 8 of 54 3.1. Description of Hamptonese Text 8 of 54 3.2. Transcription 9 of 54 3.3. Frequency Counts 14 of 54 4. Hidden Markov Models (HMMs) 14 of 54 4.1. Hidden Markov Models Applications 15 of 54 4.1.1. HMM in Speech Recognition Algorithms 15 of 54 4.1.2. Music-Information Retrieval and HMMs 16 of 54 4.1.3. English Alphabet Analysis Using HMMs 17 of 54 5. English Text Analysis Using Hidden Markov Models 17 of 54 6. Modeling the Hamptonese HMM 19 of 54 7. Hamptonese Analysis 19 of 54 7.1. Reading Techniques 19 of 54 7.2. HMM Parameters 20 of 54 8. Hamptonese HMM Results 21 of 54 8.1. Non-Grouped 21 of 54 8.2. Grouped 22 of 54 9. English Phonemes 27 of 54 9.1. English Phonemes and Hamptonese 29 of 54 10. Entropy, Redundancy, and Word Representation 29 of 54 10.1. Entropy 30 of 54 10.2. Redundancy 31 of 54 10.3.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM Public Disclosure Authorized Rural Energy 2 Project IPP87 Vol. 10 Feasibility Study Binh Dinh Province Public Disclosure Authorized Volume 3b Minority Public Disclosure Authorized Ethnic Development Plan hANQLlAtX§**s*t .NlH6NIi 1 ** Kilt] v[]C AIEN Ta '1 Revised Version Public Disclosure Authorized Power Company 3 December, Power Engineerlng & Consulting Center 2005 V SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM Rural Energy 2 Project Feasibility Study Binh Dinh Province Volume 3b Ethnic Minority Development Plan re d by Submitted by v & Cons m Rural Energy 7 ojects | ptT' - <Wl V*MtlN)g"* .kAtIHANH HUNG DINH NHAN / Director Director Datd............. IDated ,,L Power Company 3 .+, Power Engineering & Consulting Center Vietnam RE2 Project EIViDP Binh Dinh Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1-10 1. Introduction 11 1.1 The Project I1 1.2 Ethnic Minority Development Plan 12 1.2.1 Strategy for EM 12 1.2.2 Ethnic Minority in Vietnam 12 2. Ethnic Minorities in the Project Areas 13 2.1 The Bana 14 2.2 The H*e 17 2.3 The Cham 19 3. Socio-Economic Condition of EM in the Project Areas 22 3.1 The Ethnic Minorities Household Characteristics 23 3.2 Overall Household Characteristics of the EM Groups in the Project Areas 25 4. Land Use System of the Ethnic Minorities in the Project Areas 28 4.1 Land Holding of the EMs in the Project Areas 28 4.2 Land Use System of the EMs in the Project Areas 29 4.3 Farming System of the EMs in the Project Areas 30 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Cham Romanization Table Background
    1 Forward This proposal is for an international standard of romanization for Eastern (Akhar Thrah) and Western (Akhar Srak/Akhar Ka Kha) variants of the Indic Cham script. Cham language includes a variety of Chinese, Sanskrit, Arabic, Malay, highland, Khmer and Vietnamese loanwords. The term for the script Akhar meaning literature ‘letters’ can be found with variant pronunciations across the Sanskrit and Pali language worlds. There are an estimated 80,000 pages of yet unromanized manuscripts in Vietnam and Cambodia with more than 300 estimated titles. The target population includes 167,000 Cham in Vietnam and 400,000 to 500,000 Cham in Cambodia as well as 50,000 Cham in Malaysia. Even if only a small minority of these populations still use the script it is likely to continue to be the focus of cultural revival efforts amongst the many leaders in the Cham community. This system was first discussed at the CORMOSEA meeting in Philadelphia in 2014. Future work may include the mapping of Akhar Bani a variant of Arabic used in Vietnam onto these systems since there is currently an Akhar Bani revival underway as well.1 I. Justification of ALA-LC romanization The Cham language can be written best in either Arabic or Indic based script systems. The more popular ‘Cham script’ is from the Pallava-Grantha sub-family of the Brahmi Indic scripts, called ‘Akhar Thrah’ in Eastern Cham (Vietnam). Other scripts in this family are: Khmer, Thai, Lao, Burmese, Old Javanese, Balinese and Old Tagalog. There is no current ALA- LC romanization standard for Cham.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambodia - Cham
    Cambodia - Cham minorityrights.org/minorities/cham/ June 19, 2015 Profile Approximately 500,000 people (Ethnologue gives a figure of 220,000 based on 1992 Cambodian government sources; a 2004 Radio Free Asia report refers to as many as 700,000) concentrated around Kampong Cham, Kampot and Phnom Penh are ethnic Cham of Malay- Polynesian origins. Most are Muslims and speak the Cham language, which belongs to the Austronesian family. Another distinct group of Cham is sometimes called Chvea. They speak mainly Khmer and may have originated from Java. Both groups belong to the Shafi branch of Sunni Islam. A third group is known as the Jahed: also Sunni Muslims who speak Cham, they trace their ancestry to Cham refugees who fled the ancient Kingdom of Champa (primarily the principality of Panduranga) at the end of the seventeenth century, after their defeat by the Vietnamese. Large numbers of the aristocracy and members of the Cham royal family settled around Udong, and their descendants are still present in this region today. Though they are also Sunni Muslims, their version of Islam incorporates elements of Hinduism (they also do not pray five times a day and do not use Arabic as their religious language), and they also write in the Cham script (which other Chams no longer do). Today they number just over 20,000. In the countryside, Cham live in their own villages, often directly next to Cambodian villages. In the cities, Cham are clustered in their own neighbourhoods or suburbs. Cham maintain their distinctive style of dress: women have long hair and cover their heads with scarves; men wear skullcaps and often grow beards.
    [Show full text]
  • Prosody and Intonation of Western Cham (PDF)
    PROSODY AND INTONATION OF WESTERN CHAM A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI‘I AT MĀNOA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN LINGUISTICS MAY 2011 By Kaori Ueki Dissertation Committee: Victoria B. Anderson, Chairperson Barbara W. Andaya Patricia Donegan Amy J. Schafer Kenneth Rehg © Kaori Ueki 2011 ii ACKNOLWEDGMENTS No man is an island, as the saying goes. I have been fortunate to have the assistance, advice, and support from: My chair, Victoria Anderson and committee members Barbara Andaya, Amy Schafer, Patricia Donegan, and Ken Rehg; Department chair William O’Grady, Katie Drager; Graduate Student Organization Travel Award, which funded in part my 2009 field trip; Christine Kirk-Kuwaye; Osman Ysa, Ahmad Yousos, Ashnavi Ahmad, Abubakar, Emiko Stock, and Marc Brunelle for assistance with all things Cham; Vathany Say, Siti Keo, Hayden Brooks Lukas Wettstein for their hospitality while I was in Phnom Penh; Laurie Durand for copyediting; Diana Stojanovic, Hunter Hatfield, Tsz-Him Tsui, Kanjana Thepboriruk, Karen Huang, Jake Terrell, Toshiaki Furukawa, Yumiko Enyo for various linguistic discussions; Hieu Nguyen and Gina Ho for their hospitality in the last year of the writing, and Hieu for help on Vietnamese place names; Martin Bernstein and Daniel Scher for long distance support; Parents Hiroshi and Yukiko Ueki, and Iori Ueki. iii ABSTRACT This dissertation investigates the prosodic and intonational characteristics of Western Cham (three letter code for International Organization for Standardization’s ISO 639-3 code: [iso=cja]), an Austronesian language in the Chamic sub-group. I examine acoustic variables of prominence at word and postlexical levels: syllable duration, pitch excursion, and mean intensity.
    [Show full text]
  • N3398 - Roadmap Snapshot
    JTC 1/SC 2/WG 2 N3398 - Roadmap Snapshot INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARDIZATION ORGANISATION INTERNATIONALE DE NORMALISATION ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 2/WG 2 Universal Multiple-Octet Coded Character Set (UCS) ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 2/WG 2 N3398 2008-04-05 Title: Snapshot of Pictorial view of Roadmaps to BMP, SMP, SIP and SSP Ad hoc group on Roadmaps (Michael Everson, Rick McGowan, and Ken Whistler) Source: Adapted by: V.S. Umamaheswaran Status: For review and adoption by WG 2 at its meeting M52 Distribution: ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 2/WG 2, ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 2 and Liaison Organizations Replaces: JTC 1/SC 2/ WG 2/ N3306 Summary This document is the latest snapshot of the roadmap documents that has been presented to and adopted by WG 2 (ISO/ IEC JTC1/SC2/WG 2). Included in this document are four tables containing the roadmaps to ● the Basic Multilingual Plane (BMP - Plane 0) (version bmp-5-1-0, 2008-04-04) ● the Supplementary Multilingual Plane (SMP - Plane 1) (version smp-5-1-0, 2008-04-04) ● the Supplementary Ideographic Plane (SIP - Plane 2) (version sip-5-1-0, 2008-04-04, and ● the Supplementary Special-purpose Plane (SSP - Plane 14) (version ssp-5-1-0, 2008-04-04). The Roadmap ad hoc group maintains and updates the roadmaps as a service to the UTC (Unicode Technical Committee) and to WG 2 (ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 2/WG 2). The latest working version of the roadmaps can be found at http://www.unicode.org/roadmaps.
    [Show full text]
  • Convergence and Divergence in Eastern Cham Language Contact Kenneth Baclawski Jr
    Convergence and divergence in Eastern Cham language contact Kenneth Baclawski Jr. [email protected] University of California, Berkeley NWAV-AP5, Brisbane, Australia Claims • Eastern Cham ‘monosyllabization’ involves multiple processes • Some do not seem to be due to language contact • Others may have arisen as follows: • Eastern Cham and Vietnamese have convergent phonetic processes: a) In the environment of a sonorant: Unstressed syllable > homorganic sonorant b) In the environment of an obstruent: Unstressed syllable > homorganic nasal • Eastern Cham phonologizes these processes, resulting in phonological divergence • Contrastive sonorant length • Novel consonant clusters: nasal+stop Slide 2 of 41 Outline 1. Previous literature • What is monosyllabization, and is it a contact effect? 2. Descriptive account of Eastern Cham monosyllabization • Results of a sociolinguistic survey (n=28) 3. Monosyllabization as language contact • Closer look at Vietnamese phonotactics 4. Nasalization as the phonologization of phonetic processes Slide 3 of 41 1. What is monosyllabization? • Eastern Cham (Austronesian: Vietnam) is spoken by about 120,000 people in south-central Vietnam • Likely every speaker is bilingual with Vietnamese, the dominant sociopolitical language (Brunelle 2008) • Eastern Cham is in a quasi-diglossic situation: (Brunelle 2005, 2009a; Brunelle & Phú forthcoming) • H (formal): largely preserves classical Cham script from several centuries ago disyllabic roots • L (colloquial): casual speech, subsequent sound changes monosyllabic roots Proto-Chamic Cham script H L (Thurgood 1999) (Akhăr Thrah) (formal) (colloquial) *măta ‘eye’ ꨠꨓ <ma-ta> măta pta ~ mta ~ nta Slide 4 of 41 1. What is monosyllabization? • Eastern Cham is an SVO language with no bound morphology in the L (colloquial) variety • Historically, many roots were sesquisyllabic: • Presyllable: minor, unstressed, reduced syllable mă.ta • Main syllable: major, stressed, full length syllable • ‘Monosyllabization’: Deletion or reduction of presyllables Slide 5 of 41 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Telu L2/20-105 TO: UTC FROM
    telu L2/20-105 TO: UTC FROM: Deborah Anderson, Ken Whistler, Roozbeh Pournader, Lisa Moore, Peter Constable, and Liang Hai1 SUBJECT: Recommendations to UTC #163 April-May 2020 on Script Proposals DATE: April 20, 2020 The Script Ad Hoc group met on February 21, March 20, and April 17, 2020 in order to review proposals. The following represents feedback on proposals that were available when the group met. A table of contents is provided below. page I. EUROPE Latin 1 II. AFRICA Egyptian Hieroglyphs 4 III. MIDDLE EAST Arabic 5 IV. SOUTH AND CENTRAL ASIA Ahom 11 Brahmi 11 Gurmukhi 12 Mongolian 13 Tangsa 15 Telugu 16 Wancho 19 V. SOUTHEAST ASIA, INDONESIA, AND OCEANIA Javanese 20 Western Cham 21 VI. EAST ASIA Nushu 21 VII. SYMBOLS AND NUMERICAL NOTATION SYSTEMS Kaktovik numerals 22 Quikscript 22 Unicode Symbols representing Disasters 23 VIII. PUBLIC REVIEW FEEDBACK ON SCRIPTS Gurmukhi, W. Cham, Legacy Computing, Old Chinese Iteration Marks, Devanagari 24 I. EUROPE 1. Latin 1a. Extended IPA and VoQS Document: L2/20-116 Expansion of the extIPA and VoQS – Miller and Ball 1 Also participating were Ben Yang, Craig Cornelius, Michel Suignard, Manish Goregaokar, Ned Holbrook, Andrew Glass, Marek Jeziorek, Norbert Lindenberg, Steven Loomis, Patrick Chew, Sesh Sadisivam, Markus Scherer, and Lorna Evans. 1 Comments: We reviewed this proposal for 22 characters used to represent disordered speech. This proposal includes a set of 21 IPA extension characters and one Voice Quality Symbol (VoQS). The proposal combines characters from proposals seen at the January 2020 UTC (L2/20-038 and L2/20-039), with the addition of MODIFIER LETTER SMALL FENG DIGRAPH.
    [Show full text]
  • Amendment No. 1 to Registry Agreement
    Amendment No. 1 to Registry Agreement The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers and Kerry Trading Co. Limited agree, effective as of _______________________________ (“Amendment No. 1 Effective Date”), that the modification set forth below is made to the 30 April 2015 xn--w4r85el8fhu5dnra Registry Agreement between the parties (“Agreement”). The parties hereby agree to amend Exhibit A by deleting the following subsection under the section entitled “Internationalized Domain Names (IDNs)” in its entirety: 3.3. Registry Operator may offer registration of IDNs in the following languages/scripts (IDN Tables and IDN Registration Rules will be published by the Registry Operator as specified in the ICANN IDN Implementation Guidelines): 3.3.1. Han script The parties hereby further agree to amend Exhibit A by replacing the deleted subsection above with new text as a new section 3.3: 3.3. Registry Operator may offer registration of IDNs in the following languages/scripts (IDN Tables and IDN Registration Rules will be published by the Registry Operator as specified in the ICANN IDN Implementation Guidelines): 3.3.1. Arabic script 3.3.2. Armenian script 3.3.3. Avestan script 3.3.4. Azerbaijani language 3.3.5. Balinese script 3.3.6. Bamum script 3.3.7. Batak script 3.3.8. Belarusian language 3.3.9. Bengali script 3.3.10. Bopomofo script 3.3.11. Brahmi script 3.3.12. Buginese script 3.3.13. Buhid script 3.3.14. Bulgarian language 3.3.15. Canadian Aboriginal script 3.3.16. Carian script 3.3.17. Cham script 3.3.18.
    [Show full text]