Mary-Ann Ray
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Relationship Between Urbanization And
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN URBANIZATION AND POSITIVE SOCIAL BEHAVIOUR: A STUDY OF HELPFULNESS BETWEEN STRANGERS IN VARIOUS TYPE OF URBAN ENVIRONMENTS AS AN INDICATION OF QUALITY OF SOCIAL LIFE POSİTİF SOSYAL DAVRANIŞ VE ŞEHİRLEŞME ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ: ŞEHİRDE SOSYAL HAYAT KALİTESİNİN ANLAŞILMASI BAKIMINDAN BİRBİRİNİ TANIMAYAN İKİ FERT ARASINDAKİ YARDIMLAŞMANIN İNCELENMFSİ NAMIK AYVALIOĞLU Department of Psychology, University of istanbul A field study was carried out in Turkey in order to compare the level of helpfulness in town, cities, and urban squatter settle ments. Four different naturalistic measures of helpfulness were de- velopted and used: willingness to give change, willingness to coope rate with an interview, response to a small accident, and response to a lost postcard. The results generally showed significantly less helpfulness in Turkish cities than in towns and urban squatter settle ments, which showed equivalent levels of helpfulness. This supports the view that the squatters may in a pschological and social sense be «urban villagers». Consistent and considerable differences in helpful ness were also found between other typs of city districts. Some of these districts came close to the towns and squatter settle ments in their levels of helpfulness, suggesting that drawing distinc tions between environments in terms of their behavioral characte ristics is best done with the concept of a social-enviromental conti nuum rather than an urban-nonurban dichotomy. Also environmental input level as an explanation of urban social behaviour was tested in naturalistic environments, found to influence the level of help fulness for female subjects but not male subjects. Finally, a survey 106 NAMIK AYVALIOĞLU study was carried out in order to examine differences in attitudes of helpfulness between environements in the question. -
Urban Villages in China NIE, Zhi-Gang and WONG, Kwok-Chun
Urban Villages in China NIE, Zhi-Gang and WONG, Kwok-Chun Department of Real Estate and Construction University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong Email: [email protected] Abstract: There are two main types of land ownership in China – state owned land, and land owned by village communes. During the rapid urbanization of China in the past 30 years, state owned lands were sold and developed into high densities apartments. These apartments were built literally surrounding existing rural villages. Village lands were, however, not allowed to be developed because of its rural history. But when the villagers saw the profits of development, they simply build new apartments illegally at rates and densities even higher than those on state owned lands. By now, the political problems of these illegal developments are too large to be handled by local city governments. Hence, as we now see, there are high density apartments built by villagers right inside city centres. Very often these apartments are poorer in qualities. This paper traces the history of this development, and tries to induce property right implications on excessive land exploitation, in the absence of effective building regulation and control. Keywords: building regulation and control, property rights, state owned land, urban villages, village communes. 1 Historical background In mainland China, there was basically a feudal land system before the Chinese Revolution in 1911. After 1911, a system of private land ownership was still, by and large, enforced by the Chinese Nationalist Party. The Communist Land Reform started in 1946. Basically in this reform, land and other properties of landlords were expropriated and redistributed. -
Mary-Ann Ray STUDIO WORKS ARCHITECTS 1800 Industrial
Mary-Ann Ray STUDIO WORKS ARCHITECTS 1800 Industrial Street Los Angeles, CA 90021 213 623 7075 213 623 7335 fax UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN Alfred A. Taubman College of Architecture and Urban Planning Ann Arbor, MI BASE Beijing Beijing, P.R. CHINA [email protected] [email protected] www.studioworksarchitects.com www.basebeijing.cn www.basebeijing.tumblr.com Ms. Ray is the Taubman Centennial Professor of Practice at the University of Michigan’s Alfred A. Taubman College of Architecture and Urban Planning. She has also held numerous prestigious visiting chair positions at other institutions including the Saarinen Professor at Yale University and the Wortham Professor at Rice University. Ms. Ray was the Chair of Environmental Arts at Otis College of Art and Design from 1997 – 1999. Professionally, Mary-Ann Ray is a Principal of Studio Works Architects in Los Angeles and a Co- Founder and Director of BASE Beijing. Studio Works is a world renowned award winning design firm whose design work and research have been widely published. Mary-Ann Ray and her partner Robert Mangurian are architects, authors, and designers, and in 2001 they were awarded the prestigious Chrysler Design Award for Excellence and Innovation in an ongoing body of work in a design field. In 2008 they were awarded the Stirling Prize for the Memorial Lecture on the City by the Canadian Centre for Architecture and the London School of Economics. Among her published books are Pamphlet Architecture No. 20 Partly Underground Rooms and Buildings for Water, Ice and Midgets, Wrapper, and the recent Caochangdi: Beijing Inside Out. Ray is a Rome Prize recipient and Fellow of the American Academy in Rome. -
Comprehensive Plan Urban Village Indicators Monitoring Report Was Prepared by the Office of Planning and Community Development (OPCD), June 2018
Comprehensive Plan URBAN VILLAGE INDICATORS MONITORING REPORT 2018 Contacts & Acknowledgements The Comprehensive Plan Urban Village Indicators Monitoring Report was prepared by the Office of Planning and Community Development (OPCD), June 2018 CONTACTS: Diana Canzoneri, City Demographer, OPCD, [email protected], Michael Hubner, Comprehensive Planning Manager, OPCD, [email protected] Jason W. Kelly, Communications Director, OPCD, [email protected] ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: We appreciate the time, thought, and data that contributing organizations and individuals provided to make this first monitoring report happen. Office of Planning and Community Development (OPCD) Samuel Assefa Tom Hauger Diana Canzoneri Michael Hubner Patrice Carroll Jeanette Martin Ian Dapiaoen Claire Palay David Driskell Jennifer Pettyjohn Cayce James Bernardo Serna Jason W. Kelly Katie Sheehy Penelope Koven Nick Welch Geoffrey Gund Geoff Wentlandt Mayor’s Office Sara Maxana City Council Central Legislative Staff Lish Whitson Office of Housing (OH) Emily Alvarado Mike Kent Nathan Haugen Robin Koskey Laura Hewitt Walker Miriam Roskin Seattle Department of Construction and Inspections (SDCI) Moon Callison Seattle Department of Transportation (SDOT) Emily Burns Adam Parast Chad Lynch Rachel VerBoort Nico Martinucci Christopher Yake Seattle IT Patrick Morgan Rodney Young Seattle Parks and Recreation (SPR) Susanne Rockwell Seattle Planning Commission Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................ -
Rebel Cities: from the Right to the City to the Urban Revolution
REBEL CITIES REBEL CITIES From the Right to the City to the Urban Revolution David Harvey VERSO London • New York First published by Verso 20 12 © David Harvey All rights reserved 'Ihe moral rights of the author have been asserted 13579108642 Verso UK: 6 Meard Street, London WI F OEG US: 20 Jay Street, Suite 1010, Brooklyn, NY 1120 I www.versobooks.com Verso is the imprint of New Left Books eiSBN-13: 978-1-84467-904-1 British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Harvey, David, 1935- Rebel cities : from the right to the city to the urban revolution I David Harvey. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-84467-882-2 (alk. paper) -- ISBN 978-1-84467-904-1 I. Anti-globalization movement--Case studies. 2. Social justice--Case studies. 3. Capitalism--Case studies. I. Title. HN17.5.H355 2012 303.3'72--dc23 2011047924 Typeset in Minion by MJ Gavan, Cornwall Printed in the US by Maple Vail For Delfina and all other graduating students everywhere Contents Preface: Henri Lefebvre's Vision ix Section 1: The Right to the City The Right to the City 3 2 The Urban Roots of Capitalist Crises 27 3 The Creation of the Urban Commons 67 4 The Art of Rent 89 Section II: Rebel Cities 5 Reclaiming the City for Anti-Capitalist Struggle 115 6 London 201 1: Feral Capitalism Hits the Streets 155 7 #OWS: The Party of Wall Street Meets Its Nemesis 159 Acknowledgments 165 Notes 167 Index 181 PREFACE Henri Lefebvre's Vision ometime in the mid 1970s in Paris I came across a poster put out by S the Ecologistes, a radical neighborhood action movement dedicated to creating a more ecologically sensitive mode of city living, depicting an alternative vision for the city. -
Researching the Urban Dilemma: Urbanization, Poverty and Violence
Researching the Urban Dilemma: Urbanization, Poverty and Violence By Robert Muggah Copyright © IDRC, May 2012 Cover artwork designed by Scott Sigurdson, www.scottsigurdson.com Table of Contents Preface .................................................................................................................................................................... iii About the Author..................................................................................................................................................... v Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................ vi Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................. 1 Report Methodology ............................................................................................................................................... 4 Section 1: Research and Methods ........................................................................................................................... 7 Section 2: Concepts and Theories ......................................................................................................................... 13 i. Defining the “urban” ................................................................................................................................. 15 ii. Defining urban violence ............................................................................................................................ -
Bachelor of Architecture (B. Arch)
SCHOOL OF PLANNING, ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN EXCELLENCE BACHELOR OF ARCHITECTURE (B. ARCH) CHOICE BASED CREDIT SYSTEM (CBCS) CURRICULUM AND SYLLABUS EFFECTIVE FROM 2016-2017 HINDUSTAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY & SCIENCE SCHOOL OF PLANNING, ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN EXCELLENCE BACHELOR OF ARCHITECTURE (B.ARCH) (10 SEMESTER PROGRAMME) CURRICULUM EFFECTIVE FROM 2016-2017 (CBCS) SEMESTER I S. No. Code No. Subject Name L T P C TCH Theory 01. MAA112 Mathematics 3 0 0 3 3 02. ARB111 Visual Arts and Appreciation 2 0 2 3 4 03. ARB112 History of Architecture - I 3 0 0 3 3 Theory Cum Studio 04. ARB113 Materials and Construction I 2 0 2 3 4 05. ARB135 Computer Studio 1 0 4 3 5 06. ARB114 Architectural Graphics-I 1 0 4 3 5 Studio Architectural Design - I (Basic 07. ARB132 0 0 10 5 10 Design) TOTAL 12 0 22 23 34 SEMESTER II S. No. Code No. Subject Name L T P C TCH Theory 01. CEB121 Mechanics of Structures - I 3 0 0 3 3 02. ARB116 History of Architecture - II 3 0 0 3 3 03. ARB105 Theory of Architecture - I 2 0 0 2 2 Theory Cum Studio 04. ARB117 Materials and Construction - II 2 0 2 3 4 05. ARB118 Architectural Graphics - II 1 0 4 3 5 Studio 06. ARB134 Architectural Design – II 0 0 12 6 12 Workshop – Carpentry / Fabrication 07. ARB136 0 0 4 2 4 / Modelling TOTAL 11 0 22 22 33 1 SEMESTER III S.No. Code No. Subject Name L T P C TCH Theory 01. CEB221 Mechanics of Structures – II 3 0 0 3 3 02. -
School of Architecture 2016–2017 School of Architecture School Of
BULLETIN OF YALE UNIVERSITY BULLETIN OF YALE BULLETIN OF YALE UNIVERSITY Periodicals postage paid New Haven ct 06520-8227 New Haven, Connecticut School of Architecture 2016–2017 School of Architecture 2016 –2017 BULLETIN OF YALE UNIVERSITY Series 112 Number 4 June 30, 2016 BULLETIN OF YALE UNIVERSITY Series 112 Number 4 June 30, 2016 (USPS 078-500) The University is committed to basing judgments concerning the admission, education, is published seventeen times a year (one time in May and October; three times in June and employment of individuals upon their qualifications and abilities and a∞rmatively and September; four times in July; five times in August) by Yale University, 2 Whitney seeks to attract to its faculty, sta≠, and student body qualified persons of diverse back- Avenue, New Haven CT 0651o. Periodicals postage paid at New Haven, Connecticut. grounds. In accordance with this policy and as delineated by federal and Connecticut law, Yale does not discriminate in admissions, educational programs, or employment against Postmaster: Send address changes to Bulletin of Yale University, any individual on account of that individual’s sex, race, color, religion, age, disability, PO Box 208227, New Haven CT 06520-8227 status as a protected veteran, or national or ethnic origin; nor does Yale discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity or expression. Managing Editor: Kimberly M. Go≠-Crews University policy is committed to a∞rmative action under law in employment of Editor: Lesley K. Baier women, minority group members, individuals with disabilities, and protected veterans. PO Box 208230, New Haven CT 06520-8230 Inquiries concerning these policies may be referred to Valarie Stanley, Director of the O∞ce for Equal Opportunity Programs, 221 Whitney Avenue, 3rd Floor, 203.432.0849. -
ROZANA MONTIEL Mexico City [email protected]
ROZANA MONTIEL Mexico city www.rozanamontiel.com [email protected] Founder and director of the Mexico- based architectural firm ROZANA MONTIEL | ESTUDIO DE ARQUITECTURA specialized on architectural design, artistic re- conceptualizations of space, and the public domain. The studio works on a wide variety of projects in different scales and layers that range from the city to the book, the artefact and other objects. AWARDS - Winner of the “Most Outstanding Architectural Designs, Mexico 2020” in the Design and Build Awards organized by BUILD Magazine. (2020) - Finalist for the 2020 Oscar Niemeyer Award for the project “Housing in Ocuilan”. (2020) - Winner of the 2nd. place in the Corporate Interior Design category for the project “KTBO Headquarters” and 3rd. place in the category: Social Housing with the project “From the territory to the inhabitant” at the Noldi Schreck Awards organized by Glocal Design Magazine. _ Winner of th “National System of Art Creators Grant 2019” granted by FONCA (National Fund for Culture and the Arts). _ Winner of the The Sustainable Global Award for Architecture 2019 granted by Cité de l’Architecture & du Patrimoine, France. (2019) _Selected as national curator of Mexico for the Ibero-American Architecture and Urbanism Biennial: BIAU ( 2019 ). _ Winner of the Mies Crown Hall Americas Prize for Emerging Architecture MCHAP-Emerge for Common- Unity project, Chicago (2018). _Honorable mention for the “Fresnillo” project in the category “Open, recreational and landscape spaces” in the XV National and International Biennial of Mexican Architecture. (2018) _Nominated for the Swiss Architectural Award 2018, promoted by the Swiss Foundation for Architecture and the University of the Italian Switzerland. -
JANA REVEDIN Architect Phd Professor of Architecture and Urbanism
JANA REVEDIN Architect phd professor of architecture and urbanism WORKS ____ in the search for a new architectural and urban cal novel “Margherita” (Aufbau 2020) describes ethic and has given birth to a global collective the cultural and social revival of Venice during CURRICULUM (70 worldwide laureates between 2007 and 2021), the 1920ies and 1930ies. Her biographical Novel which is devoted to scientific and professional ex- about Jean-Michel Frank and his Muse Eugenia change and experimentation. Errázuriz is to appear (Aufbau 2021). VITAE In 2022 Jana Revedin is appointed the curator of Architectural Theory the first International Exposition at the Architec- Her theory of “radicant design” proposes the ture Biennale Versailles, France. collective transformation of the contemporary city on the basis of an “open-work” morphology Scientific Committees of participative experimental processes. “Radi- Jana Revedin is invited to deliver keynote lectures Born in Constance (Germany), Jana Revedin is an cant” urban renewal experiments and the related on sustainable architecture and urbanism and architect, theorist and writer. interdisciplinary pedagogy seek to demonstrate participatory design all around the world and sits The holder of a PhD in architectural and urban that the architectural and urban project, under- on the juries of numerous international prizes sciences and a full professor of architecture and stood as a collective process of co-programming, in the areas of architecture and urban develop- urbanism, studied architecture and urbanism in co-conception and co-production, is evolutionary, ment including: Europan France; Europan Swe- Buenos Aires, Princeton and Milan and taught incremental and capable of being modelled. Jana den; the Architecture Prize of the International at IUAV University in Venice as an assistant to Revedin teaches, works and writes in her mother Union of Architects (UIA); the Sustainable Urban Aldo Rossi. -
2016 by Bijoy Jain for Studio Mumbai
2016 BY BIJOY JAIN FOR STUDIO MUMBAI EDUCATION MPavilion is an annual initiative of the Naomi Milgrom Foundation that, since 2014, has brought leading architects GUIDE from Australia and around the world to Melbourne to design a temporary pavilion for the Queen Victoria Gardens. Each MPavilion hosts a diverse program of free talks, performances, workshops and educational activities and is open daily during its season. The ambition of MPavilion is to make architecture accessible as a field of design that is of central importance to the way we each experience the world. The architects invited to design each MPavilion are chosen because they are outstanding in their field and unique in their approach to architectural design. This selection criteria has resulted in each new MPavilion being very different from the last in form, materials and building technologies used. At the close of the season each MPavilion is relocated to a new home. You can visit previous MPavilions at locations across Victoria. The 2016 MPavilion by Bijoy Jain for Studio Mumbai can be visited at the Melbourne Zoo in Parkville, Melbourne. How to use this resource This resource introduces the MPavilion initiative and focuses upon the 2016 edition by Indian architect Bijoy Jain for the firm Studio Mumbai. It is aimed at students in levels/years 3-10 and its content is aligned with ictorianV and Australian curriculum descriptors. It is intended as a source of insight for educators to draw upon for use either in the classroom, or to help structure an excursion to MPavilion. Each MPavilon has its own dedicated resource and it is recommended that students visit more than one MPavilion to appreciate the contrasts between the designs of different years. -
Aerial Attunements and China's New Respiratory Publics
Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 6 (2020), 439-461 DOI:10.17351/ests2020.437 Breathless in Beijing: Aerial Attunements and China’s New Respiratory Publics VICTORIA NGUYEN1 UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO Abstract For all of its protean and ephemeral qualities, air exerts a remarkably muscular influence on urban form and contemporary life in China. In recent years, as the breakneck speed of China’s development has altered the very chemistry of the atmosphere, the boundaries between breathing subjects and their toxic environments have become increasingly blurred. In this climate, Beijing inhabitants have sought out various modes of respiratory refuge, reorganizing the city into new spaces of atmospheric fortification. As deadly air divides Beijing into a series of protected insides and precarious outsides, life is increasingly being reoriented toward the dangers and imperatives of breathing in the Chinese city. Yet alongside the growing stratification of breathing experiences in the capital, shared exposure is also reconfiguring public life and landscapes through new solidarities and entwined fates. Engaging Beijing’s emergent respiratory publics online, behind face masks, and inside conditioned air spaces, I explore how collective exposure is galvanizing new modes of atmospheric recognition in China. Specifically, I suggest that respiratory publics make invisible threats visible by mobilizing everyday objects, practices, and social life to render air both an object of concern and a site of intervention. Ultimately, by attending to how attunements to air pollution emerge through everyday practices and quotidian habits, this article expands upon a growing body of STS scholarship investigating how social life is increasingly constituted in and through atmospheric entanglements.