DOCSLIB.ORG

Town of Hooksett 2020-2030 Master Plan Update

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Town of Hooksett 2020-2030 Master Plan Update Town of Hooksett 2020-2030 Master Plan Update TOWN OF HOOKSETT, NEW HAMPSHIRE 2020-2030 MASTER PLAN Community Development Department Town Offices 35 Main Street Hooksett, NH 03106 Phone: 603-268-0279 Fax: 603-485-4423 Staff: Nicholas Williams, Town Planner This document may be viewed on the Town of Hooksett Website at www.hooksett.org HOOKSETT PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Dick Marshall – Chairman _______________________________________ Tom Walsh – Vice-Chairman _______________________________________ David Boutin – Member _______________________________________ Brett Scott – Member _______________________________________ Paul Scarpetti – Member _______________________________________ Matt Reed – Member _______________________________________ Chris Stelmach – Member _______________________________________ Rob Duhaime – Town Council Representative _______________________________________ MASTER PLAN UPDATE STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERS Dick Marshall Paul Scarpetti Desnise Grafton Matt Reed CONSULTANTS Southern New Hampshire Planning Commission Sylvia von Aulock Cameron Prolman Zachary Swick Madeline DiIonno Adam Hlasny Adoption Signatures Certification of Master Plan Adoption HOOKSETT PLANNING BOARD Hooksett, New Hampshire In accordance with New Hampshire RSA 674:4, Master Plan Adoption and Amendment, and New Hampshire RSA 675:6, Method Of Adoption, the Hooksett Planning Board, having held three (3) duly authorized public hearings on the 2020 Hooksett Master Plan on the following dates: ________, 2020; ______, 2020; and ______, 2020; the Board hereby certifies that the 2020 Hooksett Master Plan was duly adopted by a majority vote of the Board's members on _____________, 2020. _________________________________ ________________________________ Chair Vice-Chair Date of Signature by Planning Board Town Clerk Date Filed with Town Clerk Table of Contents 1. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES……………………………………………………………………………………………………… Introduction and the History of Planning in Hooksett……………………………………………………………. The Value of Citizen Participation and Volunteer Groups……………………………………………………….. About the 2020 Update…………………………………………………………………………………………… 2020 Master Plan Update Process…….………………………………………………………………………… 2020 Master Plan Update Subareas……………………………………………………………………………….. Town of Hooksett Vision Statement………………………………………………………………………………. General Planning and Development Goals………………………………………………………………………… Housing Goals……………………………………………………………………………………………………… Economic Development Goals…………………………………………………………………………………….. Conservation and Cultural Resources Goals………………………………………………………………………. Transportation Goals………………………………………………………………………………………………. Community Facilities and Recreation Goals……………………………………………………………………… 2. DEMOGRAPHIC AND REGIONAL ANALYSIS………………………………………………. Hooksett’s Regional Setting………………………………………………………………………………………. Population Statistics and Projections……………………………………………………………………………. 3. HOUSING ANALYSIS……………………………………………………………………………… Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Types of Housing…………………………………………………………………………………………………... Residential Development Considerations………………………………………………………………………….. Conclusions………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 4. Existing Land Use……………………………………………………………………………………. General Overview………………………………………………………………………………………………….. Transportation Corridors…………………………………………………………………………………………… Existing Land Use and Current Zoning………………………………………………………………………….. Land Use Issues……………………………………………………………………………………………………. 5. COMMUNITY FACILITIES, SERVICES, AND RECREATION……………………………… Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………………………….. Local Government Facilities and Services………………………………………………………………………. Public Utilities…………………………………………………………………………………………………….. Parks and Recreation Facilities…………………………………………………………………………………… Public School Facilities…………………………………………………………………………………………… 6. TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS………………………………………………………………… Existing Transportation Systems…………………………………………………………………………………. Federal and State Roadway Classifications……………………………………………………………………… Functional Classifications………………………………………………………………………………………… Traffic Congestion Mitigation Focus Areas……………………………………………………………………… Alternative Modes of Transportation…………………………………………………………………………….. 7. ECONOMIC ANALYSIS…………………………………………………………………………. Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………………………. National and Regional Market Conditions……………………………………………………………………….. Employment Sectors and Hooksett Businesses………………………………………………………………….. Economic Development Tools………………………………………………………………………………… 8. CONSERVATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES…………………………………………… Conservation Lands and Environmental Protections……………………………………………………………. Preserving the Historic Built Environment……………………………………………………………………… The Village………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 9. FUTURE LAND USE PLAN SWOT Analysis. …………………………………………………………………………………………………. Future Land Use Plan…………………………………………………………………………………………….. 10. PLAN OBJECTIVES AND IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX……………………………………. Public Policy and Administrative Action…………………………………………………………………………. Information and Education………………………………………………………………………………………… Zoning Tools………………………………………………………………………………………………………. Financial Strategy……………………………………………………………………………………………………. 1. GOALS AND OJECTIVES 1.1 Introduction and the History of Planning in Hooksett In the mid-1960s, the Town of Hooksett participated in the development of the Metropolitan Manchester Planning Study. In the late 1960s, the Town prepared its own sewerage facilities study; the first Hooksett Comprehensive Plan1 was developed in 1971, prepared by Medcalf-Eddy, under the 701 HUD program. In 1989, the Southern New Hampshire Planning Commission (SNHPC) wrote a new master plan for our community. These efforts have been complemented over the years by activities of the Hooksett Central and the Hooksett Village water precincts, by Manchester Water Works, by the Hooksett Sewer Commission, by the School Administrative Union (SAU) #15, and by SNHPC, the regional planning agency that serves Hooksett and twelve other communities in the area. The 1989 Master Plan was followed by a 2004 document, which has served as the Town’s Master Plan until the current initiative – the 2020 Hooksett Master Plan Update. 1.2 The Value of Citizen Participation and Volunteer Groups In May of 2000, the Town hired its first Town Planner. Among the high priorities that the Planning Board desired to accomplish was the updating of the then eleven-year-old master plan. The Board requested that the University of New Hampshire (UNH) Cooperative Extension Service act as facilitator for a community meeting to begin encouraging citizen input to the updating process. UNH designed a two-day meeting that commenced on the first weekend in November 2001. The effort was called a “Community Profile” and approximately 150 people from the community attended the Friday evening and Saturday sessions. There was a report prepared describing the results of the Profile that is available in the Hooksett Community Development Department. Out of the Profile effort, a Master Plan Update Committee (MPUC) was established and a steering committee formed. This group organized a “kick-off” event at the Memorial School in May 2002, which approximately 50 people attended. From this gathering, groups of volunteer citizens came forward to take on the work of “visioning”. Initial research was done, facts and figures assembled, and a set of goals and objectives were developed—in short, the first draft of each master plan chapter was compiled and written by these volunteers. In the fall of 2002, the steering committee developed a working relationship with the School of Community Economic Development at Southern New Hampshire University (SNHU). Several professors and graduate students assisted with the presentations during the five monthly public information forums during the first quarter of 2003 that were held at SNHU. The attendance at these Saturday forums ranged from 30 to 50 people. Although these meetings energized the citizens and provided 1 ample opportunities for citizen and business input to the master plan process, the Planning Board was disappointed in the level of public involvement. During 2003 and through the summer of that year, volunteers further refined the twelve chapters. By the fall of 2003, the Executive Summary was written and mailed to Hooksett citizens and the full text of the Plan was made available for review. An Informational Meeting was held on November 29, 2003, and a Public Hearing on December 4. After a 60-day comment period, the Board held a March 2004 workshop with the various chapter authors and staff. Changes were made to the text and maps. The Board proposed a second Public Hearing for June 2005. 1.3 About the 2020 Update Much has occurred since the 2004 Master Plan was originally adopted. The housing bubble and subsequent economic recession of 2008-2009 greatly impacted the development of housing and largely stifled commercial development within our community for several years. Other national, statewide, and regional factors have also had an impact. Shifting statewide trends in median age, housing affordability, and the potential I-93 North expansion project all affect the way Hooksett will develop in the future. Shifts away from brick and mortar commerce to e-commerce have reduced the financial viability of retail development, and the ongoing worldwide COVID-19 pandemic has forced us to adapt to a world in which business is conducted virtually rather than face to face. These factors, among various others, necessitate a need to update the 2004 Master
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Trinity Lutheran Church History 1882 - 1987 Our History
    Trinity Lutheran Church History 1882 - 1987 Our History Trinity Lutheran Church Chelmsford, Massachusetts 1882 – 1987 Compiled by: Priscilla Mason ©2009, Trinity Lutheran Church, Chelmsford, MA, USA 1 Table of contents Founding ...............................................................................................................................4 Events of 1888 ......................................................................................................................7 Events of 1889 ......................................................................................................................7 Events of 1891 ......................................................................................................................8 Events of 1892 ......................................................................................................................8 Events of 1893 ......................................................................................................................8 Events of 1894 ......................................................................................................................9 Events of 1895 & 1896 .........................................................................................................9 Events of 1897 ......................................................................................................................9 Events of 1898 & 1899 .......................................................................................................10 Events
    [Show full text]
  • Partnership Opportunities for Lake-Friendly Living Service Providers NH LAKES Lakesmart Program
    Partnership Opportunities for Lake-Friendly Living Service Providers NH LAKES LakeSmart Program Only with YOUR help will New Hampshire’s lakes remain clean and healthy, now and in the future. The health of our lakes, and our enjoyment of these irreplaceable natural resources, is at risk. Polluted runoff water from the landscape is washing into our lakes, causing toxic algal blooms that make swimming in lakes unsafe. Failing septic systems and animal waste washed off the land are contributing bacteria to our lakes that can make people and pets who swim in the water sick. Toxic products used in the home, on lawns, and on roadways and driveways are also reaching our lakes, poisoning the water in some areas to the point where fish and other aquatic life cannot survive. NH LAKES has found that most property owners don’t know how their actions affect the health of lakes. We’ve also found that property owners want to do the right thing to help keep the lakes they enjoy clean and healthy and that they often need help of professional service providers like YOU! What is LakeSmart? The LakeSmart program is an education, evaluation, and recognition program that inspires property owners to live in a lake- friendly way, keeping our lakes clean and healthy. The program is free, voluntary, and non-regulatory. Through a confidential evaluation process, property owners receive tailored recommendations about how to implement lake-friendly living practices year-round in their home, on their property, and along and on the lake. Property owners have access to a directory of lake- friendly living service providers to help them adopt lake-friendly living practices.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation and Community and Systems Preservation Study
    TRANSPORTATION AND COMMUNITY AND SYSTEMS PRESERVATION STUDY AMHERST, NEW HAMPSHIRE July, 2006 Prepared by the Nashua Regional Planning Commission Transportation and Community and Systems Preservation Study for Amherst, New Hampshire July, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER I: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................I-1 A. THE ISSUES ................................................................................................................................. I-1 B. STRATEGIES ................................................................................................................................ I-1 C. NEXT STEPS ................................................................................................................................ I-2 CHAPTER II: INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................II-1 A. ORIGIN OF THE TCSP STUDY.................................................................................................... II-1 B. NRPC ROLE.............................................................................................................................. II-2 C. STUDY PROCESS ........................................................................................................................ II-2 D. REPORT OVERVIEW ................................................................................................................... II-2 CHAPTER III: TRAFFIC
    [Show full text]
  • THE ESTTYICS of the NEW ENGLAND TOWN COMMON By
    THE ESTTYICS OF THE NEW ENGLAND TOWN COMMON By Alfred Howe Todd B.S. Lehigh University (1947) Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master in City Planning at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY (1950) Signature of Author City Planning Dept. May 19, 1950 Certified by Thesis Supervisor Chairman, Departmental Cohaittee on Graduate Students V, The Graduate House Mass. Inst. of Tech. Cambridge, Mass. May 19, 1950 Professor Frederick J. Adams Department of City and Regional Planning Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, Massachusetts Dear Professor Adams: In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master in City Planning, I submit this thesis entitled "The Esthetics of the New England Town Common". Respectfully, Howe Todd ACKNO LEDGENTS The author wishes to express his gratitude to Dean Wurster, Prof. Kevin Lynch, and Prof. Gygorgy Kepes for their inspiration and assistance in the accomplishment of this thesis, and to Dr. Sigfried Giedion for his persistant emphasis upon the social values of the Civic Center. He also wishes to thank Mrs. Louise A. Kent, author of "Village Greens in New England", and Mr. B. A. Benjamin, of the Massachusetts State Planning Board, for their suggestions as to the best towns to visit on the survey tour. The generousity of George Nez in lending the author valuable camera equipment for the aerial photographs is also deeply appreciated. TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE Introduction 1 I The To*sn Common 3 II The Esthetic Experience 6 III Procedure 10 IV Conclusions 13 Appendix A. 24 Washington Connecticut 25 Grafton Massachusetts 29 Framingham " 34 Shirley Center " 39 Longmeadow " 44 Boston " 48 Bedford New Hampshire 52 Waltham Massachusetts 55 Upton " 60 Leominster " 64 Appendix B.
    [Show full text]
  • Advantage MANCHESTER, NEW HAMPSHIRE 2014 REGIONAL GUIDEBOOK
    ManchesterAdvantage MANCHESTER, NEW HAMPSHIRE 2014 REGIONAL GUIDEBOOK A New Day for Elm Street The enterprising women leading Manchester’s downtown renaissance Miniature Caring Manchester for Kids The College on An Ideal Dining Commercial Street Experience www.manchester-chamber.org SMALL BUSINESS POWERS THE UNITED STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Since 1926, we’ve been proud to partner with the small businesses that drive New Hampshire’s economy. We know you’re here for the long haul. And so are we. To learn more, visit www.psnh.com. It wasn’t her lucky break, but lucky for you CMC’s Urgent Care offers unscheduled walk-in care for minor illnesses and injuries when you need it most. Urgent Care Quick, convenient, quality care Full team of board certified MD’s, NP’s and PA’s Open 7 days a week, including evenings & weekends On-site laboratory and x-ray specialists Accepted by all insurance providers Just off Interstate 293 in Bedford, NH (5 Washington Place—just north of Macy’s on South River Road) 603.314.4567 CatholicMedicalCenter.org Bellwether Community Credit Union Where Easy Adds Up. Where Easy Adds Up.TM Bellwether Community Credit Union makes it easy for you to get the most out of life and your money with smart options, superior value, and true convenience. Whether it’s depositing a check or closing a loan from home, getting a great rate on your loan, or having access to more than 30,000 free ATMs, choose Bellwether— Where Easy Adds Up. Your savings federally insured to at least $250,000 and backed by the full faith and credit of the United States Government Open to anyone living or working in New Hampshire For more information, visit us at bccu.org.
    [Show full text]
  • The Long-Ago Squadrons of Cambridge
    The Long-ago Squadrons of Cambridge Michael Kenney Cambridge Historical Commission January 2017 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This project was triggered by noting a curious description of early land divisions in Cambridge — “squadrons” — while reading an early draft of Building Old Cambridge. Co-author Charles M. Sullivan suggested that I investigate the use of that term in colonial Massachusetts. The results of that investigation are presented in this paper. Thanks are due to Sullivan, and also to his British colleague Roger Thompson. Others who aided my research with their comments included Christopher J. Lenney and Brian Donahue whose contributions are noted in the text. The reconstructed map appears in Building Old Cambridge. Sara Kenney gave a careful reading and many helpful suggestions. “Squadrons” is a curious term that shows up in the early records of Cambridge and a number of other towns in Middlesex County and eastern Worcester County. Its curiousness comes from the fact that not only is it a term that had disappeared from use by the late 1700s and apparently appears nowhere else, but also that its origin is obscure. In Cambridge it was used in 1683, 1707 and 1724 to describe divisions of land. Recent research in other town histories finds that “squadron” was used either for that purpose or to describe what soon became known as school districts. In only three of the towns studied so far did it have the military significance which it has today, and which it had in England as early as 1562. Left unanswered is the question of why this term appeared in New England by 1636 (in Watertown) and had disappeared by 1794 (in Chelmsford) — and why it was apparently used only in Middlesex County and nearby Worcester County, as well as one very early use in New Haven, Connecticut.
    [Show full text]
  • Hazard Mitigation Plan 2012
    TOWN OF AUBURN, NEW HAMPSHIRE Town of Auburn, New Hampshire, Town Offices HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 TOWN OF AUBURN NEW HAMPSHIRE HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN January 30, 2012 Prepared by the Southern New Hampshire Planning Commission The preparation of this document has been financed in part by a grant from the State of New Hampshire Department of Safety, Divison of Homeland Security and Emergency Management. Acknowledgements Appreciation is extended to the following people for contributing their time and effort to complete the Auburn Hazard Mitigation Plan : 2011-2012 Auburn Hazard Mitigation Committee Members Carrie Rouleau-Cote - Building Inspector, Town of Auburn, Chair Bill Herman - Town Administrator, Town of Auburn Kate Skoglund - Administrative Assistant, Auburn Board of Selectmen Bruce Phillips - Fire Chief/LEDC, Town of Auburn Denise Royce - Planning Board/ZBA Mike Dross - Road Agent Thanks also to: • The New Hampshire Department of Safety, Homeland Security and Emergency Management (NH HSEM), which developed the New Hampshire Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan ; • The Southwest Region Planning Commission, which developed Hazard Mitigation Planning for New Hampshire Communities ; and • The Bedford, Derry, Goffstown, Hooksett, Manchester, and New Boston Hazard Mitigation Committees and their respective Hazard Mitigation Plans. All the above publications served as models for this plan. "We will of course be there to help after disaster strikes, but as you all know, there’s no substitute for mitigation before it does.... As a poet once
    [Show full text]
  • The Forests of Presettlement New England, USA: Spatial and Compositional Patterns Based on Town Proprietor Surveys Charles V
    Journal of Biogeography, 29, 1279–1304 The forests of presettlement New England, USA: spatial and compositional patterns based on town proprietor surveys Charles V. Cogbill1*, John Burk2 and G. Motzkin2182 Walker Lane, Plainfield, VT, USA and 2Harvard Forest, Harvard University, Petersham, MA, USA Abstract Aim This study uses the combination of presettlement tree surveys and spatial analysis to produce an empirical reconstruction of tree species abundance and vegetation units at different scales in the original landscape. Location The New England study area extends across eight physiographic sections, from the Appalachian Mountains to the Atlantic Coastal Plain. The data are drawn from 389 original towns in what are now seven states in the north-eastern United States. These towns have early land division records which document the witness trees growing in the town before European settlement (c. seventeenth to eighteenth century AD). Methods Records of witness trees from presettlement surveys were collated from towns throughout the study area (1.3 · 105 km2). Tree abundance was averaged over town- wide samples of multiple forest types, integrating proportions of taxa at a local scale (102 km2). These data were summarized into genus groups over the sample towns, which were then mapped [geographical information system (GIS)], classified (Cluster Analysis) and ordinated [detrended correspondence analysis (DCA)]. Modern climatic and topo- graphic variables were also derived from GIS analyses for each town and all town attributes were quantitatively compared. Distributions of both individual species and vegetation units were analysed and displayed for spatial analysis of vegetation structure. Results The tally of 153,932 individual tree citations show a dominant latitudinal trend in the vegetation.
    [Show full text]
  • New England Town Government: a Model for Popular Assembly in Two-Tier Metropolitan Government
    NEW ENGLAND TOWN GOVERNMENT: A MODEL FOR POPULAR ASSEMBLY IN TWO-TIER METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT By Moshe ben Asher, Ph.D. Since the founding of New England towns nearly comparable to the New England model. Many are not four centuries ago, many political scientists have com- directly democratic but representative. mented on them. This examination of town govern- While the lineage of New England towns has been ment, as an organizational model for urban social infra- traced to settlements in ancient “Germania,” the form of structure, is a selective survey of those historical com- political institutions in the colonies was due less to his- mentaries. For convenience and because of the availa- torical precedents than to local economic conditions, bility of relevant literature, many examples are drawn direct experience in public life, and the land system and from the history of Massachusetts. We begin with an church government that were expedient. In any event, overview of the origins and general characteristics of the geography of New England promoted coastal and open town government, proceed to the viewpoints of river-based settlements of population clusters, and un- Jefferson, Ralph Waldo Emerson, Tocqueville, and like colonies in the South where public authority was James Bryce, then to the municipal reformers of the more centralized and monopolized by the upper class, early 1900s, and lastly, to present-day political scien- in New England the control of public affairs was seized tists. very early by the general citizenry. In these historical perspectives there are shifting The penchant for direct self-government must have styles of political science: from a non-theoretical, action stemmed in part from necessity.
    [Show full text]
  • 2002 NH Route 101 Corridor Plan
    New Hampshire Route 101 Corridor Plan Amherst, Milford, Wilton Final Report September 2002 Bedford Amherst Wilton Milford Prepared for the Nashua Regional Planning Comission (NRPC) by: Wallace Floyd Design Group Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. RKG Associates, Inc. New Hampshire Route 101 Corridor Plan 1 Table of Contents 1.0 Executive Summary 4 2.0 Introduction 9 3.0 Inventory and Analysis 11 3.1 Traffic Volumes 11 3.2 Pedestrian and Bicycle Transportation 29 3.3 Economic Development Profile 31 3.4 Land Use and Development Regulation 40 3.5 Conservation Land 55 3.6 Utilities 55 3.7 Corridor Visual Analysis 57 3.8 Natural Systems 67 3.9 Historic and Cultural Resources 73 3.10 Summary of Issues and Opportunities 75 4.0 Vision for the Future 77 5.0 Strategy and Evaluation of Corridor Improvement Concepts 79 5.1 Strategy 79 5.2 Evaluation Criteria 80 5.3 Traffic Operations Analysis 82 New Hampshire Route 101 Corridor Plan 2 6.0 Proposed Roadway Improvements 88 6.1 Amherst East of the Bypass 88 6.2 Bypass in Milford and Amherst 90 6.3 Transition from Western Milford to Wilton 93 6.4 Improvements in Wilton 95 6.5 Pedestrian and Bicycle Improvements 96 6.6 Corridor Aesthetics 97 6.7 Development Guidance and Review 102 7.0 Implementation 106 7.1 Priorities and Cost 106 7.2 Implementation Process 106 8.0 Acknowledgements 110 Appendix A - Public Meeting Notes Appendix B - Design Guidelines for Milford Industrial Area (BROX) Appendix C - RKG Market Study of the BROX Property New Hampshire Route 101 Corridor Plan 3 Executive Summary 1.1 The Problem Route 101 gets a little worse every year: congestion, accidents, traffic that should be on the highway is cutting through residential neighborhoods.
    [Show full text]
  • FY 2017 – FY 2040 Regional Transportation Plan
    FY 2017 – FY 2040 Regional Transportation Plan For the Southern New Hampshire Planning Commission Auburn Deerfield Manchester Bedford Francestown New Boston Candia Goffstown Weare Chester Hooksett Windham Derry Londonderry Adopted January 24, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER I ................................................................................................................................................................ 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Southern New Hampshire Planning Commission Region ............................................................................ 1 1.2 Transportation .......................................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Authority for the Plan................................................................................................................................. 4 1.4 Scope of the Plan ....................................................................................................................................... 4 1.5 Technical Approach ................................................................................................................................... 6 CHAPTER II .............................................................................................................................................................. 8 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Auburn, New Hampshire Hazard Mitigation Plan Executive Summary
    TOWN OF AUBURN, NEW HAMPSHIRE Town of Auburn, New Hampshire, Town Offices HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2018 TOWN OF AUBURN NEW HAMPSHIRE HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN October 2018 Prepared for the Town of Auburn, NH, NH Homeland Security & Emergency Management (NHHSEM) and Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) by The Southern New Hampshire Planning Commission with assistance from the Auburn Hazard Mitigation Committee October, 2018 October 22, 2018 Public Hearing Date October 22, 2018 Adoption Date Final Plan Acknowledgements Southern NH Planning Commission and the Town of Auburn wish to thank the following individuals for serving on the Town’s Hazard Mitigation Committee and for their assistance in the development of this Plan: Acknowledgements Appreciation is extended to the following people for contributing their time and effort to complete the Auburn Hazard Mitigation Plan: 2016-2018 Auburn Hazard Mitigation Committee Members Edward Gannon Fire Chief/Emergency Director, Town of Auburn, Chair Lori Collins Principal, Auburn Village School Lillian Deeb Police, Town of Auburn Mike Dross Road Agent, Town of Auburn Bill Herman Town Administrator, Town of Auburn Ray Pelton Police Chief, Town of Auburn Carrie Rouleau-Cote Building Inspector, Town of Auburn Denise Royce Planning/Land Use Administrator, Town of Auburn Jim Scalnier Fire Inspector, Town of Auburn Madeline DiIonno Southern New Hampshire Planning Commission Cameron Prolman Southern New Hampshire Planning Commission Derek Shooster Southern New Hampshire Planning Commission Zachary Swick
    [Show full text]