Perception Financial Services Cyber Threat Briefing Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Perception Financial Services Cyber Threat Briefing Report PERCEPTION FINANCIAL SERVICES CYBER THREAT BRIEFING REPORT Q1 2019 1 Notable Cyber Activity within Financial Services Contents January 2019 October 2018 A security researcher discovered that The State Bank of India Between the 4th and 14th October 2018 HSBC reported a number Table of Contents . 1 (SBI), India’s largest bank, had failed to secure a server which of US online bank accounts were accessed by unauthorized users, Welcome . 1 was part of their text-messaging platform. The researcher was with potential access to personal information about the account able to read all messages sent and received by the bank’s ‘SBI holder. HSBC told the BBC this affected fewer than 1% of its 1 Notable Cyber Activity within Financial Services . 2 quick’ enquiry service which contained information on balances, American clients and has not released further information on 2 Threat Actor Profile: The Carbanak Organized Crime Gang . 4 phone numbers and recent transactions. This information could how the unauthorized access occurred. have been used to profile high net worth individuals, or aid social 3 Benefits and challenges of deploying TLS 1.3 . 5 engineering attacks which are one of the most common types of It is likely that this was an example of a credential-stuffing attack, 4 Ethereum Classic (ETC) 51% Attack . 9 financial fraud in India.1 where attackers attempt to authenticate with vast quantities 5 Authoritative DNS Security . 10 of username and password combinations obtained from other December 2018 compromised sites, hoping to find users who have re-used their Kaspersky published a detailed examination of intrusions into credentials elsewhere. This highlights the importance of deploying at least eight banks across Eastern Europe in a campaign they two-factor authentication for sensitive logons and/or detection have dubbed ‘Dark Vishnya’. In each case the attackers used an techniques to block anomalous access.5,6 unknown device connected to the company’s local network with remote access through a mobile network connection. Once in August 2018 the network, the attackers carried out reconnaissance and lateral On the 14th of August 2018 the Cosmos Bank, India’s second movement to reach machines used for making payments.2 oldest and more importantly India’s second largest bank was compromised by a two-stage attack. The first stage of the attack November 2018 saw 11.5 million USD stolen. The second stage of the attack The Bank of England hosted a one-day exercise to test the happened on the same day as the first however this time nearly sector’s resilience to a major disruption arising from a cyber- 2 million USD was withdrawn through debit card transactions incident. Around forty organizations took part along with located in India. Reports at the time stated that malware was used the Treasury, Financial Conduct Authority and UK Finance. to infect the bank’s ATM server to steal credit card information as Concerns were raised by some that a pre-arranged event may well as stealing SWIFT codes required for transactions. not adequately stress-test organizations’ preparedness, but Cosmos Bank stated that the cyber-attack was launched nevertheless the event highlights the importance of holding from 22 different geographical locations. Research conducted regular war-gaming exercises alongside practical tests of by Securonix attributed the attacks to North Korea pointing security controls. The bank is expected to publish some of the specifically at the APT group known as The Lazarus Group.7,8 lessons learned at a later date, although it has said that due to Brexit preparations it will delay the introduction of cyber-related impact tolerances on the sector.3,4 Welcome to the latest edition of PERCEPTION the cyber threat intelligence briefing for the financial services sector from Nettitude and edited by Dr Graham Shaw. The briefing report contains informative, relevant and timely information about the cyber threat landscape, current threat actors and recent activities. The report is designed to help you address the cyber risks faced by your organization. Nettitude provides a wide range of cyber threat and assurance services including red team simulation testing, threat modeling, attack surface analysis and tracking on threat actors, their methods and techniques. Please contact [email protected] to inquire further. We hope you enjoy reading this edition of PERCEPTION. Yours sincerely, Ben Densham Chief Technology Officer 1 https://techcrunch.com/2019/01/30/state-bank-india-data-leak/ 2 https://securelist.com/darkvishnya/89169/ 3 https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/news/2018/november/sector-resilience-exercise. 4 https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-boe-cyber/bank-of-england-says-will-delay-work-on-cyber-stress-tests-for-banks-idUKKBN1O40ZL 5 https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/Res%20102923%20PIB%20MAIN%20v3_1.pdf 1 6 https://threatpost.com/hsbc-data-breach-hits-online-banking-customers/138856/ 2 7 https://www.pcrisk.com/internet-threat-news/13425-how-hackers-stole-135-million-usd 8 https://www.securonix.com/securonix-threat-research-cosmos-bank-swift-atm-us13-5-million-cyber-attack-detection-using-security-analytics/ 2 Threat Actor Profile: The Carbanak Organised Crime Gang June 2018 March 2018 In June the Ukrainian Cyber Police Chief spoke out and stated In March of 2018 information outlined by McAfee pointed The Carbanak Group, (aka Fin7) is an organized cyber-criminal What is clear about the Carbanak group are their TTPs (Tactics, that hackers back by Russia were infecting Ukrainian companies to the North Korean linked threat actor The Lazarus Group gang which was first discovered in 2014 by Kaspersky Labs. techniques and procedures). To compromise their victim, they with malicious software. He outlined the Ukrainian assessment conducting campaigns against Turkish financial organizations. When they were first discovered Kaspersky outlined how they utilize spear-phishing with malicious attachments and links. Once that the malicious software was being used to create back-doors This campaign saw a resurgence of the Bankshot malware. This had been targeting banks with malware that was introduced to a victim is compromised, they move through the bank’s internal into large companies for potentially damaging future coordinated malware along with other TTPs conducted in the attack bore its target via phishing emails. The Carbanak Group appears to network infecting servers and controlling ATMs. Their preferred attacks against them. Of the companies being targeted the main similarities to previous attacks against the Turkish government be almost entirely financially motivated with the majority of their criminal acts are then to transfer money to foreign bank accounts, focus was critical infrastructure and banking organizations which have been linked to North Korea. attacks focused on the financial sector. It is unclear how much inflate bank account balances for money-mules to withdraw and the group has stolen from banks in total, but reports vary from command ATM machines to spit out money which the money- Although Russia has denied the accusations, this is another The Bankshot malware is capable of wiping files and content $900 million to well over a billion. mules collect. Further actions tend to see the stolen money example of rising geo-political tensions affecting the private while staying hidden on the victim’s system. This malware converted into one of several cryptocurrencies to help obfuscate sector. Relations between Ukraine and Russia continue to be which also goes by the name Trojan Manuscript is also capable its final destination. difficult, in 2014 following the annexation of Crimea, Ukraine of searching for and connecting to the SWIFT global banking 11 accused Russia of orchestrating a large scale cyber-attack and network. have remained vigilant since. 9 March 2018 April 2018 In March of 2018 the United States of America accused Iran In May the head of the Mexican Central Bank reported that of stealing intellectual property from over 300 universities in Mexican banks had been targeted in an attack which was America, Europe and East Asia. They were also accused of similar to previous attacks against the Bangladesh banking stealing intellectual property from financial services companies sector in 2016. It has been reported that around $15.4 million and government agencies. The US attorney for the southern was obtained although it’s not clear how much was extracted district of New York called it “one of the largest state-sponsored as cash. In response the Mexican central bank is now creating a hacking campaigns ever prosecuted by the DOJ (Department cyber-security unit which will provide advice and guidance to of Justice)”. the county’s banking sector. 10 This hack is believed to have started in 2013 and continued for four years. The US government stated that it was the Mabna Institute which started the attacks, which the US now calls “a Hacker network”. 9 https://www.reuters.com/article/us-ukraine-cyber-exclusive/exclusive-ukraine-says-russian-hackers-preparing-massive-strike-idUSKBN1JM225 10 https://www.reuters.com/article/us-mexico-cyber/mexico-central-bank-to-create-cyber-security-unit-after-hack-idUSKCN1IG3AB 11 https://www.ibtimes.com/north-koreas-hidden-cobra-hackers-target-turkey-bankshot-malware-2662019 Figure 1: Carbanak, a global threat 12 On the 26th March 2018 the suspected leader of the notorious The distinction between what has been named the Carbonak cyber-crime gang “Carbanak”, named only as ‘Denis K’, was group and others named by other organizations as Cobalt or FIN7 arrested in Alicante, Spain. This arrest was part of an international is sometimes unclear, with shared techniques and tools being police cooperation between Europol and the Joint Cybercrime used. It has therefore been suspected that Carbonak may not Action Taskforce. It was also the first time that the EBF (European be one group but several groups utilizing and sharing the same Banking Federation) had actively cooperated with Europol on a TTPs.
Recommended publications
  • SSL/TLS Implementation CIO-IT Security-14-69
    DocuSign Envelope ID: BE043513-5C38-4412-A2D5-93679CF7A69A IT Security Procedural Guide: SSL/TLS Implementation CIO-IT Security-14-69 Revision 6 April 6, 2021 Office of the Chief Information Security Officer DocuSign Envelope ID: BE043513-5C38-4412-A2D5-93679CF7A69A CIO-IT Security-14-69, Revision 6 SSL/TLS Implementation VERSION HISTORY/CHANGE RECORD Person Page Change Posting Change Reason for Change Number of Number Change Change Initial Version – December 24, 2014 N/A ISE New guide created Revision 1 – March 15, 2016 1 Salamon Administrative updates to Clarify relationship between this 2-4 align/reference to the current guide and CIO-IT Security-09-43 version of the GSA IT Security Policy and to CIO-IT Security-09-43, IT Security Procedural Guide: Key Management 2 Berlas / Updated recommendation for Clarification of requirements 7 Salamon obtaining and using certificates 3 Salamon Integrated with OMB M-15-13 and New OMB Policy 9 related TLS implementation guidance 4 Berlas / Updates to clarify TLS protocol Clarification of guidance 11-12 Salamon recommendations 5 Berlas / Updated based on stakeholder Stakeholder review / input Throughout Salamon review / input 6 Klemens/ Formatting, editing, review revisions Update to current format and Throughout Cozart- style Ramos Revision 2 – October 11, 2016 1 Berlas / Allow use of TLS 1.0 for certain Clarification of guidance Throughout Salamon server through June 2018 Revision 3 – April 30, 2018 1 Berlas / Remove RSA ciphers from approved ROBOT vulnerability affected 4-6 Salamon cipher stack
    [Show full text]
  • Configuring SSL for Services and Servers
    Barracuda Web Application Firewall Configuring SSL for Services and Servers https://campus.barracuda.com/doc/4259877/ Configuring SSL for SSL Enabled Services You can configure SSL encryption for data transmitted between the client and the service. In the BASIC > Services page, click Edit next to a listed service and configure the following fields: Status – Set to On to enable SSL on your service. Status defaults to On for a newly created SSL enabled service. Certificate – Select a certificate presented to the browser when accessing the service. Note that only RSA certificates are listed here. If you have not created the certificate, select Generate Certificate from the drop-down list to generate a self-signed certificate. For more information on how to create self- signed certificates, see Creating a Client Certificate. If you want to upload a self-signed certificate, select Upload Certificate from the drop- down list. Provide the details about the certificate in the Upload Certificate dialog box. For information on how to upload a certificate, see Adding an SSL Certificate. Select ECDSA Certificate – Select an ECDSA certificate presented to the browser when accessing the service. SSL/TLS Quick Settings - Select an option to automatically configure the SSL/TLS protocols and ciphers. Use Configured Values - This option allows you to use the previously saved values. If the values are not saved, the Factory Preset option can be used. Factory Preset - This option allows you to enable TLS 1.1, TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3 protocols without configuring override ciphers. Mozilla Intermediate Compatibility (Default, Recommended) - This configuration is a recommended configuration when you want to enable TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3 and configure override ciphers for the same.
    [Show full text]
  • Hosting Multiple Certs on One IP
    Hosting multiple SSL Certicates on a single IP S Solving the IPv4 shortage dilemma FULL COMPATIBILITY When it comes to SSL security, hosting companies are increasingly facing In public environments, using SNI alone would mean cutting access to a issues related to IP addresses scarcity. Today every digital certificate used large number of potential site visitors as around 15% of systems (as of to provide an SSL connection on a webserver needs a dedicated IP January 2013) are incompatible with SNI. address, making it difficult for hosting companies to respond to increas- ing demand for security. The true solution GlobalSign has developed a solution to address hosting companies’ operational limitations and to let them run multiple certificates on a By coupling the Server Name Indication technology with SSL Certificates single IP address, at no detriment to browser and operating system and a CloudSSL Certificate from GlobalSign, multiple certificates can compatibility. now be hosted on a single IP without losing potential visitors that might lack SNI support. Host Headers GlobalSign SSL Certificates can be installed on several name-based virtual hosts as per any SNI-based https website. Each website has its To address the current concern of shortage of IPv4 addresses, most own certificate, allowing for even the highest levels of security (such as websites have been configured as name-based virtual hosts for years. Extended Validation Certificates). When several websites share the same IP number, the server will select the website to display based on the name provided in the Host Header. GlobalSign will then provide a free fall-back CloudSSL certificate for legacy configurations, enabling the 15% of visitors that do not have SNI Unfortunately this doesn’t allow for SSL security as the SSL handshake compatibility to access the secure websites on that IP address.
    [Show full text]
  • The Trip to TLS Land Using the WSA Tobias Mayer, Consulting Systems Engineer BRKSEC-3006 Me…
    The Trip to TLS Land using the WSA Tobias Mayer, Consulting Systems Engineer BRKSEC-3006 Me… CCIE Security #14390, CISSP & Motorboat driving license… Working in Content Security & IPv6 Security tmayer{at}cisco.com Writing stuff at “blogs.cisco.com” Agenda • Introduction • Understanding TLS • Configuring Decryption on the WSA • Troubleshooting TLS • Thoughts about the Future • Conclusion For Your Reference • There are (many...) slides in your print-outs that will not be presented. • They are there “For your Reference” For Your Reference Microsoft and Google pushing encryption • Microsoft pushing TLS with PFS • Google, FB, Twitter encrypting all traffic • HTTPS usage influencing page ranking on google • Deprecate SHA1, only SHA2+ • Browser Vendors aggressively pushing https • Problems with older TLS versions leading to upgrade of servers to newer protocols and ciphers • Poodle, Freak, Beast, …. Google Search Engine • Google ranking influenced by using HTTPS • http://blog.searchmetrics.com/us/2015 /03/03/https-vs-http-website-ssl-tls- encryption-ranking-seo-secure- connection/ Understanding TLS TLS Versions • SSLv3, 1996 • TLS 1.0, 1999, RFC2246 • TLS 1.1, 2006, RFC4346 • Improved security • TLS 1.2, 2008, RFC5246 • Removed IDEA and DES ciphers • Stronger hashes • Supports authenticated encryption ciphers (AES-GCM) • TLS 1.3, currently Internet Draft Attacks… • POODLE • SSLv3 Problems with Padding, turn of SSLv3 • BEAST • Know issues in CBC mode, use TLS 1.1/1.2 with non-CBC mode ciphers (GCM) • CRIME/BREACH • Compression Data Leak, disable
    [Show full text]
  • How Organisations Can Properly Configure SSL Services to Ensure the Integrity and Confidentiality of Data in Transit”
    An NCC Group Publication “SS-Hell: the Devil is in the details” Or “How organisations can properly configure SSL services to ensure the integrity and confidentiality of data in transit” Prepared by: Will Alexander Jerome Smith © Copyright 2014 NCC Group Contents 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................... 3 2 Protocols ........................................................................................................................................................ 3 3 Cipher Suites ................................................................................................................................................. 4 4 Certificates ..................................................................................................................................................... 5 4.1 Self-Signed or Untrusted Certificates ................................................................................................... 5 4.2 Mismatched Hostnames ....................................................................................................................... 6 4.3 Wildcard Certificates ............................................................................................................................. 6 4.4 Extended Validation Certificates .......................................................................................................... 7 4.5 Certificate Validity Period ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Avocent® ACS 6000 Advanced Console Server Release Notes Version 3.1.0.8 UPDATE! July 24, 2015
    Avocent® ACS 6000 Advanced Console Server Release Notes Version 3.1.0.8 UPDATE! July 24, 2015 This document outlines: 1. Update Instructions 2. Appliance Firmware Version Information 3. Features/Enhancements 4. Bug Fixes =================================================================================== 1. Update Instructions =================================================================================== NOTE: Please refer to the ACS 6000 Installation/Administration/User Guide for detailed instructions on updating the ACS 6000 console server to version 3.1.0. IMPORTANT NOTE: This version should be upgraded from version 2.5.0-11 or newer. Appliances with earlier versions should be upgraded to version 2.5.0-11 or newer before the upgrade to version 3.1.0.8. In order to have all features listed in this release available through DSView™ management software, DSView™ software version 4.5.0.123 or later and ACS 6000 console server plug-in version 3.1.0.4 are required. After the ACS 6000 console server firmware has been upgraded to version 3.1.0, it is mandatory that the web browser cache of any system which intends to be connected to the ACS 6000 console server web interface is cleared. To do this, press Ctrl-F5 from the browser. ACS 6000 console server firmware version 3.1.0 provides an internal mechanism which preserves the existing configuration when upgrading from firmware version 3.0.0. However, it is strongly recommended that you back up the system configuration before the firmware version upgrade. =================================================================================== 2. Appliance Firmware Version Information =================================================================================== Appliance/Product Firmware Type Version Filename Avocent® ACS 6000 Opcode V_3.1.0.8 avoImage_avctacs-3.1.0-8.bin Console Server avoImage_avctacs-3.1.0-8.bin.md5 =================================================================================== 3.
    [Show full text]
  • SSL EVERYWHERE Application and Web Security, Many Websites Still Have Weak Best Practices for Improving Enterprise Security Implementations of SSL/TLS
    SOLUTION BRIEF CHALLENGES • Even with recent focus on SSL EVERYWHERE application and web security, many websites still have weak Best Practices for improving enterprise security implementations of SSL/TLS. without impacting performance • Main reasons for weak SSL Although increased attention has been focused on application and web security implementations include lack recently, many websites still have weak implementations of Secure Socket Layer of infrastructure and browser (SSL) / Transport Layer Security (TLS). Lack of infrastructure and browser support, support, performance penalty, and performance penalty, and implementation complexity have been the primary implementation complexity. reasons for the dearth of stronger SSL implementations. However, with recent • Legacy hardware load balancers advances in the SSL protocol, as well as significant performance improvements of cannot scale elastically, and are SSL on commodity x86 platforms, stronger SSL can be – and should be – everywhere. capped at speeds that are punitively Avi Networks Application Delivery Controller (ADC) natively supports these new tied to acquisition costs. capabilities to maximize application security without sacrificing performance. SOLUTION • The Avi Vantage Platform natively NEW ACRONYMS IN THE WORLD OF SSL implements server name indication Server Name Indication (SNI) (SNI) infrastructure, HTTP Strict Virtual hosting with SSL is a chicken-and-egg problem. The client sends an SSL Transport Security (HSTS), RSA and Hello, and the server must send back the SSL public key. If there are multiple Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) domain names attached to the same IP address, a client that supports Server Name certificates, and Perfect Forward Indication (SNI) sends the hello along with the requested domain name. The server Secrecy (PFS) with point-and-click can now send back the proper SSL response.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fundamentals of Http/2 the Fundamentals of Http/2
    Ali Jawad THE FUNDAMENTALS OF HTTP/2 THE FUNDAMENTALS OF HTTP/2 Ali Jawad Bachelor’s Thesis June 2016 Information Technology Oulu University of Applied Sciences ABSTRACT Oulu University of Applied Sciences Degree Programme, Option of Internet Services Author: Ali Jawad Title of the bachelor’s thesis: Fundamentals Of HTTP/2 Supervisor: Teemu Korpela Term and year of completion: June 2016 Number of pages: 31 The purpose of this Bachelor’s thesis was to research and study the new ver- sion of HTTP ”HTTP2.0”, which is considered to be the future of the web. Http/2 is drawing a great attention from the web industry. Most of the Http/2 features are inherited from SPDY. This thesis shows how HTTP/2 enables a more efficient use of network re- sources and a reduced perception of latency by introducing a header field com- pression and allowing multiple concurrent exchanges on the same connection ”multiplexing” and more other features. Also, it discusses the security of Http/2 and the new risks and dangerous at- tacks that resurfaces with the arrival of this new protocol version. The simulation results show how HTTP/2 influences the page load time compar- ing to the other previous versions of HTTP. Keywords: HTTP1, HTTP/2, SPDY, SNI, DOS, CRIME, Downgrade-attack. 3 PREFACE This thesis was written for Oulu University of Applied Sciences and done during 1 February – 23 May 2016. The role of the instructor was guiding the thesis from the requirements and bases of writing a thesis document through meet- ings. The role of the supervisor was instructing the thesis plan and its require- ments which were done by the author.
    [Show full text]
  • Check Ssl Certificate Issuer
    Check Ssl Certificate Issuer Far-seeing and cheerless Gabriele stratified her breadstuff antagonises amitotically or inswathed post, is Vladimir conventual? Which Whitney bedims so once that Remington hulls her eyelets? Egocentric Salomone pickax slovenly, he tweezes his Martyn very penetratively. You can then both connections from a chain as ssl certificate is considered If the user trusts the CA and officer verify the CA's signature before he often also property that in certain. How do verify openssl certification chain Support SUSE. Get your certificate chain brake As all know certificates are. Cross-certificates are CA certificates in clamp the issuer and subject across different. The steps to rope the certificate information depend how the browser For handsome in Google Chrome click because the lock icon in the address bar men to vault the Connection tab and bang on Certificate Information Search is the issuer organization name. Ansible receives a local. Additional bulk information, and to your organization validated ssl checkers that signed by sending data travels securely over https settings, this is to code. When installing an SSL Certificate the following message may appear. As usual database for minimum and issuer information to threads and more extensive database infrastructure for any section. Troubleshooting Certificate Verification Failures Forcepoint. How Do they View an SSL Certificate in Chrome and Firefox Chrome has made available simple machine any site visitor to get certificate information with just an few clicks Click the. Once in a host value of a system. A fake high school diploma will be pass the test Employers colleges the US military and government agencies always taking their background checks.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of the HTTPS Certificate Ecosystem
    Analysis of the HTTPS Certificate Ecosystem∗ Zakir Durumeric, James Kasten, Michael Bailey, J. Alex Halderman Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA {zakir, jdkasten, mibailey, jhalderm}@umich.edu ABSTRACT supporting public key infrastructure (PKI) composed of thousands We report the results of a large-scale measurement study of the of certificate authorities (CAs)—entities that are trusted by users’ HTTPS certificate ecosystem—the public-key infrastructure that un- browsers to vouch for the identity of web servers. CAs do this by derlies nearly all secure web communications. Using data collected signing digital certificates that associate a site’s public key with its by performing 110 Internet-wide scans over 14 months, we gain domain name. We place our full trust in each of these CAs—in detailed and temporally fine-grained visibility into this otherwise general, every CA has the ability to sign trusted certificates for any opaque area of security-critical infrastructure. We investigate the domain, and so the entire PKI is only as secure as the weakest CA. trust relationships among root authorities, intermediate authorities, Nevertheless, this complex distributed infrastructure is strikingly and the leaf certificates used by web servers, ultimately identify- opaque. There is no published list of signed website certificates ing and classifying more than 1,800 entities that are able to issue or even of the organizations that have trusted signing ability. In certificates vouching for the identity of any website. We uncover this work, we attempt to rectify this and shed light on the HTTPS practices that may put the security of the ecosystem at risk, and we certificate ecosystem.
    [Show full text]
  • Encrypted Traffic Analysis
    Encrypted Traffic Analysis The data privacy-preserving way to regain visibility into encrypted communication Whitepaper by Artur Kane, Tomas Vlach and Roman Luks Executive Summary Encryption is considered as security by design. It undoubtedly helps to avoid risks such as communication interception and misuse. Therefore it is natural that all responsible organizations adopt encryption as an im- portant way of protecting business critical applications and services. Ac- cording to Gartner 80 % of web traffic will be encrypted in 2019. Ironically, encryption as a security measure created a grey zone of traffic with unlimited space for attackers to hide their activity. And when the volume of encrypted traffic grows year by year, this is a challenge for security professionals to keep their assets secure. Unfortunately, traditional packet analysis based network measuring solu- tions for obvious reasons cannot understand what’s inside such traffic. Consequently, effective troubleshooting, security monitoring and compli- ance enforcement are paralyzed. Flowmon overcomes the inability of getting actionable network insights by introducing the concept of Encrypted Traffic Analysis, the only pri- vacy-preserving and ultimately scalable way of understanding modern encrypted communication. Given such functionality of the Flowmon solution to automatically filter genuinely relevant data, tremendously streamlines malware and data exfiltration detection, vulnerability assess- ment and troubleshooting. This approach is much less privacy invasive and more cost efficient than the legacy solution of using SSL proxies to decrypt traffic, analyse it and then encrypt again. 50% of all known cyber attacks use encryption to evade detection. In 2013 the number was below 5 %. 2/3 of organizations can’t detect malicious SSL traffic.
    [Show full text]
  • Digicert® Technical Certifications SSL/TLS Training Guide
    DigiCert Technical Certifications SSL/TLS Professional Training Guide Introduction This training guide is designed to help you prepare for the DigiCert Technical Certification: SSL/TLS Professional assessment exam. The exam will consist of 50 multiple-choice questions with a maximum time allowed of 1 hour. The intended audience for this assessment is anybody who works with SSL/TLS technology in a technical role (technical support, SSL/TLS administrator, etc). Objectives Before attempting the DigiCert Technical Certification: SSL/TLS Professional assessment exam, you should be able to do the following: • Describe the main purpose and • List common algorithms used in TLS for functions of SSL & TLS key agreement, encryption, digital • Describe the history and versions of SSL signatures, and hashing & TLS • Describe “Forward Secrecy” • Describe symmetric and asymmetric • List the benefits of Elliptic Curve encryption models Cryptography for TLS • Describe how digital signatures work • Explain the dangers of expired, • Describe the details of an SSL/TLS misconfigured, self-signed and “vendor” certificate, including extensions and file certificates formats • Identify common vulnerabilities of • Describe DV, OV, EV and private SSL outdated protocols (Heartbleed, etc) certificates • Describe how phishing websites work • Describe the benefits of EV certificates • Describe Server Name Indication (SNI) • Describe SAN and wildcard certificates • Describe Certificate Transparency (CT) • Describe domain control and • Describe Certificate Authority
    [Show full text]