Rule 0.1 Preamble and Incorporation by Reference
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Feasibility Study in Doha, Qatar
Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems AERIAL ROPEWAY SYSTEM- FEASIBILITY STUDY IN DOHA, QATAR Journal: Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems Manuscript ID juvs-2020-0028.R2 Manuscript Type: Article Date Submitted by the 26-Jan-2021 Author: Complete List of Authors: Tahmasseby, Shahram; Qatar University College of Engineering, aerial ropeway system, ridership, capital cost, operation and Keyword: maintenance, revenue Is the invited manuscript for Draft consideration in a Special Not applicable (regular submission) Issue, Collection, or competition? : © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Page 1 of 30 Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems AERIAL ROPEWAY SYSTEM FEASIBILITY STUDY IN DOHA, QATAR Dr. Shahram TAHMASSEBY a Qatar Transportation and Traffic Center(QTTSC), College of Engineering-Qatar University, Doha, Qatar ABSTRACT Aerial ropeway systems, also called gondolas and aerial cable cars, are amongst driverless transportation modes, which are progressively drawing the attention in promoting tourism. Aerial ropeway systems have been operated in touristic spots e.g., over lakes, rivers, and hilly lands in several countries. Passengers can enjoy a view from the above and experience a stress-free and reliable trip. Furthermore, those systems can be exploited as a public transportation in urbanized and populated regions. The objective of this article is to investigate the viability of implementing a gondola line flying over Doha Bay in Qatar as a tourist attraction from the marketing, economic, and environmental point of view. In this study, the associated costs (capital, maintenance, and operating) of implementing a monocable detachable gondola technology(MDG) are estimatedDraft using international best practices in the world. The economic analysis outcome demonstrates that the revenues generated from the fares could counterweigh the required capital investment as well as operating and maintenance costs and hence the proposed gondola could be economically attractive for investors. -
Ski & Snowboard Courses
Ski & Snowboard Courses Icon Key ------------------------------------------------------ Welcome We have over a decade of experience running ski and snowboard courses. Knowing the ins and outs of the industry, we’ve chosen the best resorts and snow schools to give you confidence in our selection of courses. We are committed to keeping things simple and there are no hidden extras – each course clearly shows what is and isn’t included using the icon key. Aeroplane Flights Bus Transfers Hotel Accommodation Knife & Fork GUARANTEED Meals Gondola EXCELLENCE Lift Pass A training company owned and managed by Pen & Paper Exam fees snow-sports instructors, just for you. Check out our website for dates, prices and Info Visa/job advice complete course details. Wifi www.wintersportscompany.com Internet access 01736 763402 Skier Ski-in, ski-out resort Helicopter Heli-skiing/boarding Badge Membership of instructor organisation Weights Fitness programme Thumbs up Most popular courses 1 2 Course Qualifications Recommendations ------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------ All qualifications are recognised internationally, however employers usually Starting a Career require level 2 as a minimum. Complete Instructor Course 7 Career start-out on a budget United Kingdom Zero to Hero • BASI - British Association of Snowsports Instructors 8 Spend your first full season getting all the qualifications you need Canada BASI Instructor Course 11 • CSIA - Canadian Ski Instructors Alliance Includes real work experience as a level 1 instructor • CASI - Canadian Association of Snowboard Instructors Internship 13 Maximum work experience in 1 season New Zealand • NZSIA - New Zealand Snowsports Instructor Alliance Already Qualified? • SBINZ - Snowboard Instruction New Zealand Advanced Training Course 10 Dedicated level 2 & 3 training to boost your earning potential ISIA - International Ski Instructor Association Level 3 Internship The international governing body of snowsports instructors. -
Chair Lift Challenge" Explores How Engineers Develop Transportation Systems to Operate in Different and Sometimes Challenging Environments
IEEE Lesson Plan: C hair Lift Challenge Explore other TryEngineering lessons at www.tryengineering.org Lesson Focus Lesson focuses on unique challenges in transportation engineering, such as devising a method for skiers or hikers to get to the top of a mountain. Students work in teams to design a "chair lift" out of everyday items that can transport a ping pong ball in a chair of their own design from the bottom of a "valley" to the top of a "mountain" along a clothes line or wire without the ball falling out. Students design their chairlift and chair on paper, execute their design, test it, reflect on the challenge, and share their experiences with the class. Lesson Synopsis The "Chair Lift Challenge" explores how engineers develop transportation systems to operate in different and sometimes challenging environments. Students work in teams to design a chair lift made out of everyday materials that can carry a ping pong ball up a rope line and back down in a controlled manner so that the ball does not fall out of a chair the team has also designed. They sketch their plans, consider material selection, build their system, test it, reflect on the challenge, and present their experiences to their class. A g e L e v e l s 8-18. Objectives Learn about engineering design and redesign. Learn how engineering can help solve society's challenges. Learn about teamwork and problem solving. Anticipated Learner Outcomes As a result of this activity, students should develop an understanding of: civil engineering engineering design teamwork Lesson Activities Students explore how engineers work to provide safe transportation options in different environments and climates. -
Ropeways for Urban and Materials Transport
Ropeways for Urban and Materials Transport Eustace Mwarania Abstract:Ropeways also known as cable cars have traditionally been deployed to facilitate tourism in scenic locations, difficult to access by conventional means. Recent innovations involving faster speeds and larger cabins are transforming ropeways into the realm of urban environment. Ropeways are also providing creative materials transport solutions. This paper will begin by considering the use of ropeway systems to alleviate congested segments of our cities by providing an additional aerial transit mode. Examples will be given from cities that have already realized urban ropeways and an overview of such projects under development in Kenya. This will then be followed by discussion of ropeways solutions in mining and port operations. 1. Introduction A ropeway is a type of aerial lift which is supported and propelled by cables from above. It consists of a loop of steel cable that is strung between stations, over intermediate supporting towers. The cable is driven by a bull wheel in one terminal, which is typically connected to an engine or electric motor. The ropeway is the most typical and traditional mountain transportation but recently it has started being taken into serious consideration for use in urban transport and in amusement parks, to access panoramic viewing points and in general in all locations which are difficult to reach[1,2]. In addition, the ropeways are increasingly being applied to solve material transport problems[3]. This paper considers the use of ropeway systems in urban and materials transport. In part 2 ropeway technology is introduced. Part 3 explains the urban applications including the benefits and functions that ropeways perform.Part 4 explains the use of ropeways for materials transport and highlights potential applications in mining and cargo movement in ports. -
White Paper: Urban Application of Aerial Cableway Technology
WHITE PAPER: URBAN APPLICATION OF AERIAL CABLEWAY TECHNOLOGY WSP USA | June 2018 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY WSP USA is pleased to present the following white paper that summarizes the benefits and items for consideration of aerial cableway technology; outlines the project development process; and addresses advantages, costs and challenges associated with developing aerial cableway systems in urban environments. Urban applications of aerial cableway technology have been successfully integrated into transit networks in numerous cities around the globe, including the Portland Aerial Tram (Portland, Oregon) and Roosevelt Island Tram (New York, NY). Interest in aerial cableway technology has grown considerably in the United States in recent years, and initial feasibility studies have been completed in several U.S. cities, including San Diego, CA; Washington DC; and Brooklyn, NY. WSP is evaluating aerial cableway technology as an innovative first- and last-mile connection to regional transit in urban areas. Aerial cableway technology offers multiple benefits, including: relatively lower costs compared to other transportation modes, the ability to overcome significant changes in topography and other obstacles in natural and man-made environments, the ability to bypass congested roadways and transportation corridors, the ability to move high volumes of passengers: the equivalent of one city bus every minute, a streamlined design that fits into the urban environment, the potential to integrate transit-oriented development (TOD) near stations, and the ability to provide service between residential areas and key destinations. Many of these benefits have been realized in existing systems in La Paz, Bolivia, and Medellin, Colombia. Specifically, Medellin’s Line K transports more than 40,000 passengers per day between residential areas and the city center, reducing some commute times from more than an hour to approximately 10 minutes. -
Annual Report (PDF)
Andrew M. Cuomo Board of Directors Governor Darryl C. Towns, Chairperson Charlene M. Indelicato Fay Fryer Christian Dr. Katherine Teets Grimm President/Chief Executive Officer David Kraut Donald D. Lewis Robert L. Megna Vice President/General Counsel Roosevelt Island Operating Corporation of the State of New York Howard Polivy Steven Chironis 591 Main Street, Roosevelt Island, NY 10044 Michael Shinozaki Vice President/Chief Financial Officer T: (212) 832-4540 • F: (212) 832-4582 Margaret Smith http://rioc.ny.gov THE ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION Public Authority Annual Report Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2013 Background The Roosevelt Island Operating Corporation of the State of New York ("RIOC") is a public benefit corporation and a political subdivision of the State of New York. RIOC was created by the New York State legislature, in 1984, to take responsibility, pursuant to a General Development Plan (GDP), for the development and operation of the 147 acres comprising the former Welfare Island, located in New York City's East River. RIOC assumed the role of the New York State Urban Development Corporation as lessee under a 99-year Master Lease (running until 2068) from the City of New York. The GDP, which has been amended from time to time, provides for the development of housing, shops and community facilities for a mixed income, handicap accessible, residential neighborhood. As an island community, Roosevelt Island requires specialized operations and capital infrastructure maintenance such as an aerial tramway, comprehensive garbage compacting system and seawall improvements. RIOC supplements the very basic services provided by the City of New York, and provides specialized operations and capital improvements. -
Moving Individuality …
Moving Individuality … ... with inclined elevators 3 2 Going up since 1876. For special and individual elevator equipment New possibilities with inclined elevators solutions we at Hütter Aufzüge have been the right partner for over 130 years. We are a medium-sized Our expertise is in demand world-wide, in particular company and managed by what is already the with regard to innovative inclined elevators, which fourth generation of the founding family. We are 1876: Heinrich Hütter founds Maschinenfabrik H. Hütter Jr. 1989: Achim Hütter, the fourth generation, takes over often represent a more effective and economical specialised in the design, production and installation alternative to classical vertical elevators – or even Just a few years later the fi rst elevators were offered. management of the business. of complete special elevators and elevator open up completely new possibilities of mobility. In components, tailored exactly to the specifi cations in 1916: The second generation: Heinrich Hütter takes over 1994: Restruction of the company to H. Hütter Jr. this sector we are regarded as one of the leading terms of construction, planning, function and design. international suppliers. the company after the death of his father. Verwaltungs-KG, Hütter-Aufzüge GmbH and However unusual or demanding the project might 1943: The company premises are totally destroyed in the Hütter-Aufzüge Service GmbH. For example, inclined elevators enable train be: we have the experience and the know-how, to stations to be retrofi tted at comparatively little Second World War. 1999: Bernd Hütter enters the company as Managing Director. achieve impressive, superior quality, turnkey effort with access for disabled persons. -
Code of Colorado Regulations 1 and Lifts, Surface Lifts and Tows - Safety Requirements
DEPARTMENT OF REGULATORY AGENCIES Passenger Tramway Safety Board PASSENGER TRAMWAYS 3 CCR 718-1 [Editor’s Notes follow the text of the rules at the end of this CCR Document.] _______________________________________________________________________________ Rule 0.1 Preamble and incorporation by reference. Section 25-5-704(1)(a) of the Colorado Revised Statutes allows the Colorado Passenger Tramway Safety Board (“Board”) to “use as general guidelines the standards contained in the 'American Standard Safety Code for Aerial Passenger Tramways', as adopted by the American Standards Association, Incorporated, as amended from time to time.” Since 1965, when this provision was enacted, the American Standards Association, Inc., has been succeeded by the American National Standards Institute, Inc. and the American Standard Safety Code updated. The relevant publications are now known as the “American National Standard for Passenger Ropeways – Aerial Tramways, Aerial Lifts, Surface Lifts, Tows and Conveyors – Safety Requirements” (“ANSI B77.1-2011”) and the “American National Standard for Funiculars – Safety Requirements” (“ANSI B77.2-2004”). The Board adopts and incorporates by reference, with certain additions, revisions, and deletions, the ANSI standards as listed below: B77.1-1960 June 8, 1960 USA standard Safety Code for Aerial Passenger Tramways B77.1a-1963 July 1, 1963 Addenda to USA standard Safety Code for Aerial Passenger Tramways B77.1b-1965 July 26, 1965 Addenda to USA standard Safety Code for Aerial Passenger Tramways B77.1-1970 March -
Page 1 of 11 Glossary of Ski Terms by Skis.Com 9/6/2015
Glossary of Ski Terms by Skis.com Page 1 of 11 Home > Ski-O-Pedia > Glossary of Ski Terms Glossary of Ski Terms By Steve Kopitz 12/18/2012 Skiing and snowboarding are two of the greatest winter sports on the planet, and like anything else in this world the two sports have certain terms and jargon that can be confusing without a bit of definition. Below you will find a number of terms/phrases used in skiing and snowboarding to refer to products, clothing, and the sports of skiing and snowboarding in general. We have provided a brief definition to help clear up any confusion or questions you may have on these terms/phrases. A ABS Sidewall: Industry term for a type of edge construction on skis and snowboards using high quality ABS (Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene) plastic. All-Mountain Ski: A large percentage of Alpine skis fall into this category. All-Mountain skis are designed to perform in all types of snow conditions and at most speeds. Other names for this style of ski include Mid- Fat skis, All-Purpose skis, and the One-ski Quiver. Alpine Skiing: Downhill skiing, as opposed to Nordic Skiing. Après-Ski: The day’s over – time for drinks and swapping war stories from the slopes. Audio Helmet: A helmet wired with speakers that allows you to listen to music while skiing. Avalanche Beacon: A safety device worn by skiers, snowboarders, and others in case an avalanche traps them. The beacon transmits a signal (typically at the international standard frequency of 457khz) that rescuers can use to locate a buried person. -
Steering Committee Bonita to Bridgeport May 13, 2019 Bonita to Bridgeport Timeline
Steering Committee Bonita to Bridgeport May 13, 2019 Bonita to Bridgeport Timeline 2 2 Options Considered 1. Fewer business impacts Detailed traffic study by the end of 2019 will help partners collaborate on at-grade 2. Lower cost with fewer risks to project crossing design. schedule 3. Station at Upper Boones Ferry Road serves • Safety –follow industry best practices employment center • Transit reliability and travel time –make 4. Multiple potential designs for Bridgeport transit fast and easy Station, including option with no business • Traffic issue –motor vehicle queuing, level displacements of service, delay –meet 2035 “no-build” conditions (2045 at I-5 ramps) Comparison of Options LPA At-Grade, Refined Traffic Issues 7 7 Future Planned Projects 8 10 10 April 25th Open House • About 30 people; 10 comment cards • Many supported LPA elevated (for traffic and avoiding business impacts) • A few supported 74th Ave, refined (for station at 74th & Upper Boones) • A few supported LPA at-grade, refined • Many advocated for bike and pedestrian access to stations 11 Community Advisory Committee (CAC) feedback • Unanimous concurrence with staff findings • Additional Considerations: • Safety improvements for people walking and biking at Upper Boones crossing • Freight mobility at 72nd & Upper Boones • Interconnected signals • Robust support for relocated businesses 12 Staff Recommendation: LPA At-Grade, Refined 1. Fewer business impacts Detailed traffic study by the end of 2019 will help partners collaborate on at-grade crossing design. 2. Lower cost with fewer risks to project schedule 3. Station at Upper Boones Ferry Road serves • Safety –follow industry best practices employment center • Transit reliability and travel time –make 4. -
TCQSM Part 8
Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual—2nd Edition PART 8 GLOSSARY This part of the manual presents definitions for the various transit terms discussed and referenced in the manual. Other important terms related to transit planning and operations are included so that this glossary can serve as a readily accessible and easily updated resource for transit applications beyond the evaluation of transit capacity and quality of service. As a result, this glossary includes local definitions and local terminology, even when these may be inconsistent with formal usage in the manual. Many systems have their own specific, historically derived, terminology: a motorman and guard on one system can be an operator and conductor on another. Modal definitions can be confusing. What is clearly light rail by definition may be termed streetcar, semi-metro, or rapid transit in a specific city. It is recommended that in these cases local usage should prevail. AADT — annual average daily ATP — automatic train protection. AADT—accessibility, transit traffic; see traffic, annual average ATS — automatic train supervision; daily. automatic train stop system. AAR — Association of ATU — Amalgamated Transit Union; see American Railroads; see union, transit. Aorganizations, Association of American Railroads. AVL — automatic vehicle location system. AASHTO — American Association of State AW0, AW1, AW2, AW3 — see car, weight Highway and Transportation Officials; see designations. organizations, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. absolute block — see block, absolute. AAWDT — annual average weekday traffic; absolute permissive block — see block, see traffic, annual average weekday. absolute permissive. ABS — automatic block signal; see control acceleration — increase in velocity per unit system, automatic block signal. -
Chapter 405. Elevators and Other Lifting Devices
Ch. 405 ELEVATORS AND LIFTING DEVICES 34 CHAPTER 405. ELEVATORS AND OTHER LIFTING DEVICES GENERALLY Sec. 405.1. Scope. 405.2. Standards. 405.3. Permit application. 405.4. Approved designs, equipment and devices. 405.5. Acceptance inspection. 405.6. Certificate of operation. 405.7. Periodic inspections. 405.8. Periodic testing. 405.9. Periodic dynamic testing. 405.10. Major repairs, replacements and alterations. 405.11. Accident report. 405.12. Lumber elevators. STAGE, ORCHESTRA AND ORGAN CONSOLE ELEVATORS 405.31. Applicability. 405.32. Platforms. 405.33. Shaftway requirements. 405.34. Projections and recesses. 405.35. Landing doors. 405.36. Lifting capacity. 405.37. Operating speed. 405.38. Operating controls. 405.39. Switches. 405.40. Pit and pit access. 405.41. Single operator requirement. 405.42. Additional requirements. Authority The provisions of this Chapter 405 issued under sections 105(c) and 301 of the Pennsylvania Con- struction Code (35 P. S. §§ 7210.105(c) and 7210.301), unless otherwise noted. Source The provisions of this Chapter 405 adopted January 9, 2004, effective April 9, 2004, 34 Pa.B. 319, unless otherwise noted. Cross References This chapter cited in 34 Pa. Code § 403.22 (relating to health care facilities); 55 Pa. Code § 2600.97 (relating to elevators and stair glides); and 55 Pa. Code § 2800.97 (relating to elevators and stair glides). 405-1 (351243) No. 431 Oct. 10 34 § 405.1 UNIFORM CONSTRUCTION CODE Pt. XIV GENERALLY § 405.1. Scope. (a) Application of chapter. This chapter constitutes the Uniform Construction Code technical requirements for elevators and other lifting devices. This chapter applies to the construction, alteration, addition, repair, movement, equipment, removal, maintenance, use and change in use of every elevator and lifting device after April 9, 2004.