DOCSLIB.ORG

Wellington Shire Council Urban Biodiversity Plan Is

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Wellington Shire Council Urban Biodiversity Plan Is Wellington Shire Council URBAN BIODIVERSITY PLAN Page 1 INDEX Background What is Biodiversity? ......................................................... Page 3 Why is Biodiversity important? ................................................. 3 Local Government and Biodiversity ........................................... 3 Purpose ..................................................................................... 4 Objectives ................................................................................. 4 Links to Existing Plans and Strategies ........................................ 4 Methodology ............................................................................ 5 References ................................................................................ 5 Township Masterplans Heyfield ............................................................................. Page 7 Longford .................................................................................... 12 Maffra ....................................................................................... 16 Rosedale ................................................................................... 23 Sale – South .............................................................................. 31 Sale – North .............................................................................. 39 Stratford .................................................................................... 47 Wurruk ...................................................................................... 53 Yarram ...................................................................................... 58 Page 2 Background What is Biodiversity? The word Biodiversity is a contraction of the term “biological diversity” and refers to the variety and variability of life. This includes the diversity within species and between species. Ecosystem biodiversity includes the relationship between biotic (living) and abiotic (non-living) components, and all the different habitats that exist. Why is Biodiversity important? There are many reasons why biodiversity should be enhanced and protected. Biodiversity is important for its own sake because it provides natural living conditions and a supply of food for all creatures (including humans). Additionally, we depend on the natural world (and biodiversity within) for natural resources, supply of medicines and other products, and knowledge about the natural world contributes to human innovation. It is important for people to have a connection to nature to sustain our cultural identity, and provide opportunities for aesthetic appreciation and to experience nature in the wild. “Nowadays, people tend to have little awareness of their lives being dependent on nature. By inhaling air, eating food and metabolising it, they are in a constant state of exchange with nature. Therefore, not only man’s very survival, but also every cultural activity is contingent on an intact nature” (Lanzerath & Friele, 2014) Local Government and Biodiversity Wellington Shire Council recognises the importance of protecting, maintaining and enhancing biodiversity on Council-managed land such as roadsides, parks, reserves and open space. Each year Council’s staff actively manage and restore areas of native vegetation in urban and rural settings for the benefit of biodiversity conservation and public amenity. The Victorian Government’s strategy, Protecting Victoria’s Environment - Biodiversity 2037, has formally recognised the importance of the community connecting with nature for physical and mental wellbeing, including outdoor play contributing to building resilience and social connections in children. “Evidence shows that connecting with nature is linked to positive long-term health outcomes, but that increasing urbanisation is leading to a decrease in people accessing nature, which in turn has been linked to poorer physical and mental health” (DELWP, 2017) Local Government managed parks and reserves are important in providing the community with easy access to natural experiences in urban landscapes. Wellington Shire Council is committed to help people connect to nature via parks, reserves and open space, a concept explored in depth in Council’s Open Space Plan 2014-2024. To encourage the Wellington Shire community to connect to nature, Council supports appropriate biodiversity themed projects organised by local community groups and Government Agencies, and, where possible, Council will create partnerships to improve biodiversity outcomes. Page 3 Purpose The purpose of this Wellington Shire Council Urban Biodiversity Plan is • To articulate Council’s approach to managing and sharing our biodiversity assets • To align Council’s operations with the objectives of the Victorian Government’s: Protecting Victoria’s Environment – Biodiversity 2037 Objectives This Biodiversity Plan will 1. Develop individual Town Biodiversity Masterplans 2. Identify and prioritise opportunities for maintaining and enhancing biodiversity and natural values in urban areas within Wellington Shire. 3. Guide operational delivery of Wellington Shire’s land and natural environment projects 4. Identify partnership and engagement opportunities to enhance interaction and appreciation of natural environment Links to Existing Plans and Strategies: The key documents whose principles and goals were integral to guiding the development of the Urban Biodiversity Plan: • Protecting Victoria’s Environment – Biodiversity 2037 Goal 1: Victorians value nature – Victorians understand that their personal wellbeing and the economic wellbeing of the state are dependent on the health of the natural environment (DELWP, 2017) Goal 2: Victoria’s natural environment is healthy – Victoria has functioning plant and animal populations, improved habitats and resilient ecosystems, even under climate change (DELWP, 2017) • Wellington 2030 Maintain and enhance access to the Natural Environment for a wide range of outdoor pursuits at our beaches, high country, open spaces and waterways. This access to the natural environment is balanced with the need to conserve and protect Continue to have diversity of healthy native plants and wildlife with well protected habitat areas free of invasive species Manage Natural Environment assets recognising their impact on health and wellbeing • Wellington Shire Council Plan 1.1.3 Provide and manage open spaces and infrastructure that enable and encourage healthy and active lifestyles 3.1 Conserve and protect our natural environment through responsible and sustainable management practices 3.3 Build resilience in our communities and landscapes to mitigate risks from a changing climate Page 4 • Wellington Shire Council - Public Open Space Plan 2014-2024 Vision: Have communities engaged with, valuing and using a diverse range of sustainable open spaces that are safe to use, are welcoming, engaging and accessible. These spaces will be well distributed and connected, increase the biodiversity of our urban centres and provide quality public open space that makes a significant contribution to the health and wellbeing of our communities, the liveability of our urban centres and a significant contribution to our Wellington 2030 strategic vision (Wellington Shire Council, 2014) Other plans and strategies that the Urban Biodiversity Plan aligns with include • Wellington Shire Council Environmental Sustainability Strategy • Town Development Plans Methodology The following approach was taken for developing Town Biodiversity Masterplans • Desktop mapping and ground truthing to identify Council assets contributing to urban biodiversity values • Document known history, features, values, current management, and future management opportunities for each identified Council asset • Subjective assessment and valuation of Council assets, relative to the urban area being assessed. The Priority Matrix (Figure 1) was created as a structured decision-making tool to assist in the valuation, prioritisation, and allocation of resources for on-ground works • Identification of other biodiversity assets and their relevant land managers occurring within the study areas • Identify Urban Biolinks that may be enhanced or created through well planned activities such as street tree planting, waterway revegetation and management, subdivision planning. • Identify one-off works actions for Council assets that will enhance existing site biodiversity values and/or create increased community engagement. Record associated costs, possible funding sources, potential delivery partners, and timeframe for delivery. References DELWP (2017), Protecting Victoria’s Environment – Biodiversity 2037, The State of Victoria, Department of Environment Land Water and Planning, Melbourne. Lanzerath, D., & Friele, M. (2014). Concepts and Values in Biodiversity (Routledge Studies in Biodiversity Politics and Management). Florence: Taylor and Francis. Wellington Shire Council (2014), Public Open Space Plan 2014-2024, Wellington Shire Council, Sale Wellington Shire Council (2014), Council Plan 2017-2021, Wellington Shire Council, Sale. Wellington Shire Council (2014), Wellington 2030, Wellington Shire Council, Sale. Page 5 Figure 1. Priority Matrix for WSC on-ground works in natural areas and reserves Page 6 HEYFIELD Biodiversity in Heyfield is dominated by the Heyfield Wetlands on the south-eastern side of town. This area has an interesting history as town common for a variety of functions including Light Horse Brigade parade ground, rifle range, a horse race track and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Town of St. Joseph, Wisconsin Natural Areas Inventory/ Land Cover Mapping September 2016
    Town of St. Joseph, Wisconsin Natural Areas Inventory/ Land Cover Mapping September 2016 Prepared for: Town of St. Joseph, Wisconsin Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Services Inc. TOWN OF ST. JOSEPH, WISCONSIN NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY/ LAND COVER MAPPING SEPTEMBER 2016 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................. III 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................1.1 1.1 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES OF THE NRI .......................................................................... 1.1 2.0 A BRIEF LOOK AT THE NATURAL HISTORY OF THE STUDY AREA ..................................2.4 2.1 BEDROCK GEOLOGY AND GLACIAL LANDSCAPES .................................................. 2.4 2.2 AFTER THE GLACIERS ...................................................................................................... 2.4 2.3 INFLUENCE OF LANDFORM AND CLIMATE ON VEGETATION TYPES ......................... 2.9 2.4 PRE-HISTORIC INFLUENCE OF HUMANS ON THE LANDSCAPE ................................. 2.10 2.5 VEGETATION AT THE TIME OF LAND SURVEY ............................................................. 2.10 2.6 POST-SETTLEMENT INFLUENCES ON THE LANDSCAPE ............................................... 2.10 3.0 PROJECT METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................3.12 3.1 GATHER AND REVIEW BACKGROUND INFORMATION............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Vulnerability of the Biota in Riverine and Seasonally Flooded Habitats to Damming of Amazonian Rivers
    Received: 11 December 2019 Revised: 8 April 2020 Accepted: 5 June 2020 DOI: 10.1002/aqc.3424 SPECIAL ISSUE ARTICLE Vulnerability of the biota in riverine and seasonally flooded habitats to damming of Amazonian rivers Edgardo M. Latrubesse1 | Fernando M. d'Horta2 | Camila C. Ribas2 | Florian Wittmann3 | Jansen Zuanon2 | Edward Park4 | Thomas Dunne5 | Eugenio Y. Arima6 | Paul A. Baker7 1Asian School of the Environment and Earth Observatory of Singapore (EOS), Nanyang Abstract Technological University (NTU), Singapore 1. The extent and intensity of impacts of multiple new dams in the Amazon basin on 2 National Institute of Amazonian Research specific biological groups are potentially large, but still uncertain and need to be (INPA), Manaus, Brazil 3Institute of Floodplain Ecology, Karlsruhe better understood. Institute of Technology, Rastatt, Germany 2. It is known that river disruption and regulation by dams may affect sediment sup- 4 National Institute of Education (NIE), plies, river channel migration, floodplain dynamics, and, as a major adverse conse- Nanyang Technological University, Singapore quence, are likely to decrease or even suppress ecological connectivity among 5Bren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California (UCSB), populations of aquatic organisms and organisms dependent upon seasonally Santa Barbara, California, USA flooded environments. 6Department of Geography and the Environment, University of Texas at Austin, 3. This article complements our previous results by assessing the relationships Austin, Texas, USA between dams, our Dam Environmental Vulnerability Index (DEVI), and the biotic 7 Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke environments threatened by the effects of dams. Because of the cartographic rep- University, Durham, North Carolina, USA resentation of DEVI, it is a useful tool to compare the potential hydrophysical Correspondence impacts of proposed dams in the Amazon basin with the spatial distribution of Edgardo Latrubesse, Asian School of the Environment and Earth Observatory of biological diversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Ann Forsyth DESIGNING SMALL PARKS
    Ann Forsyth DESIGNING SMALL PARKS DESIGNING SMALL PARKS r -. A Manual Addressing Social and Ecological Concerns B~ An-f1? Musacchi. With Frank I John Wiley & Sons, Inc. This book is printed on acid-free paper. @ Copyright O 2005 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey Published simultaneously in Canada This project was supported by the USDA Forest Service Urban and Community Forestry Program on the recommendation of the National Urban and Community Forestry Advisory Council. Except where noted, all drawings are from the Metropolitan Design Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, and used by permission. All photographs without additional credits are available in the Metropolitan Design Center's Image Bank at www.designcenter.umn.edu. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior written permission of the Publisher, or authorization through payment of the appropriate per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, (978) 750-8400, fax (978) 646-8600, or on the web at www.copyright.com. Requests to the Publisher for permission should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, (201) 748-6011, fax (201) 748-6008, or online at www.wiley.com1golpermission. Limit of LiabilitylDisclaimer of Warranty: While the publisher and the author have used their best efforts in preparing this book, they make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this book and specifically disclaim any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft 1/13/2020
    Ecological Assessment of the 91st Street and College Avenue Property For Schmidt Associates By Kevin Tungesvick Senior Ecologist Eco Logic LLC Ecological Assessment of the 91st and College Property Background This approximately 52 acre property is located at the southwest corner of 91st Street and College Ave on the north side of Indianapolis, Indiana. Approximately 28 of these acres are mowed turf containing soccer fields with an accompanying parking lot. The remaining acreage is occupied by unmanaged woodlands and a detention basin. This report is an assessment of current ecological condition of these unmanaged areas. Soils and Geology This property is located on the Tipton Till Plain of central Indiana, a region covered by Wisconsin age glacial till. All of the soils on the site are derived from this till. The three soil types that occur on this property are Miami silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes (MmB2), Crosby silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes (CrA), and Treat silty clay, 0 to 1 percent slopes (ThrA). Of these soils, the Miami is considered moderately well drained, the Crosby is considered somewhat poorly drained, and the Treaty is considered poorly drained. Treaty soils are considered hydric soils and harbor most of the probable wetlands on the site. A map showing the locations of these soil types is attached to this report and labeled with the above abbreviations for each soil type. Heritage Trees Heritage Trees are defined below: The majority of the woodlands on this property are in an early successional state, mostly containing trees less than 75 year old and in many cases, less than 50 years old.
    [Show full text]
  • During More Than 50% of Sampling Events in Flint Creek at County Road 400 West, County Road 700 South, and Turner Road
    Region of the Great Bend of the Wabash River Watershed Management Plan 10 May 2011 during more than 50% of sampling events in Flint Creek at County Road 400 West, County Road 700 South, and Turner Road. Concentrations measured as high as 3,500 colonies/100 mL. Undersaturated conditions were observed in Flint Creek at County Road 700 South and at County Road 375 West. Dissolved oxygen saturations measured between 45 and 55% at both sites during multiple sampling events. Turbidity routinely measured higher than the target concentration at all sites where observations occur. This suggests that Flint Creek may contain a high background suspended sediment concentration or that the high sinuosity and prevalence of easily erodible soils results in elevated suspended sediment concentrations on a routine basis. Figure 135. Water quality impairments in the Flint Creek subwatershed. Data used to create this map are detailed in Appendix A. Habitat Volunteer monitors assessed habitat at nine sites within the Flint Creek subwatershed using the Citizen’s Qualitative Habitat Evaluation Index (CQHEI). As previously detailed, the CQHEI scores sites based on the presence or absence of specific natural characteristics within a stream reach. Although a comparison scale for the CQHEI has not yet been developed, Hoosier Riverwatch indicates that scores greater than 60 rate as habitat conducive to supporting warm-water biota (IDNR, 2004). Scores ranged from 40.5 at County Road 700 South (west of SR 25) to 75.5 at County Road 700 South (SR 25). Volunteer assessments of Flint Creek at County Road 700 South (west of SR 25), County Road 375 West, and County Road 700 South (west of CR 700 West) indicate that habitat rated poorer than the level at which habitat is conducive to supporting warm-water biota.
    [Show full text]
  • Lima2019ecologicaltransactions
    Edinburgh Research Explorer Ecological value of abandoned wild landscapes in Chinese cities Citation for published version: Hu, X & Lima, MF 2019, Ecological value of abandoned wild landscapes in Chinese cities. in WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment. vol. 238, Wessex Institute, Southampton, pp. 331-342. https://doi.org/10.2495/SC190301 Digital Object Identifier (DOI): 10.2495/SC190301 Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Published In: WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 30. Sep. 2021 The Sustainable City XIII 331 ECOLOGICAL VALUE OF ABANDONED WILD LANDSCAPES IN CHINESE CITIES XINLEI HU & MARIA FRANCISCA LIMA Edinburgh School of Architecture and Landscape Architecture, The University of Edinburgh, UK ABSTRACT This paper is focused on urban industrial abandoned wild landscapes which have experienced structural changes, and where abandonment triggered a natural vegetation succession process, as well as fauna’s progressive reoccupation. Due to such natural regeneration, abandoned wild landscapes have high biodiversity and ecological value and have been gaining attention from the scientific and planning communities.
    [Show full text]
  • View the Protecting Natural Areas Design Guide
    protecting natural areas design guide 1 Copyright © 2004 Nature Heritage Fund This report may be freely copied provided that the Nature Heritage Fund is acknowledged as the source of the information. Design guide compiled by a landscape architecture team including Jeremy Head, Leona deRidder and Claire Findlay. ISBN 0-478-22470-2 reprinted 2005 Nature Heritage Fund P.O.Box 10-420 Wellington Phone 04 471 3214 Fax 04 471 3018 www.nhf.govt.nz [email protected] 2004 protecting natural areas – a design guide introduction identifying natural values & significance design factors & recommendations Page 1. natural areas cue to original landscape character 7 2. remnants of original functioning eco-systems 8 3. extend across ecological sequences 9 4. underlying land systems analysis 10 5. catchment-based design 11 6. natural boundaries the most effective 13 7. respect natural change 14 8. seek self-sustaining areas 15 9. link isolated areas to enhance value 15 10. maximise the core and minimise the edge 16 11. consider buffers at the same time as boundaries 17 12. access requirements for management and maintenance 20 13. site fence-lines according to landform 21 14. consider carefully plant pests…. 23 15. … and the risks of animal pests 23 16. natural regeneration or vegetation restoration? 24 17. be aware of cultural needs 25 18. public access to protected natural areas can have advantages 25 summary and checklist 26 3 introduction Most of our “lived in landscapes” comprise a mix of productive and remnant natural areas but it is the natural areas that characterise our unique New Zealand landscape identity and ecological diversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Heritage Strategy Phase 1 Report
    Submitted to the City of Guelph City of Guelph Natural Heritage Strategy Phase 1: Terrestrial Inventory Design & Defining Locally Significant Natural Areas Tree preservation on Grange Hill Torrance Creek PSW from Bathgate Drive Hanlon Creek Swamp PSW Homes backing onto Preservation Park FINAL REPORT March 2005 Dougan & Associates Submitted by Ecological Consulting Services Dougan & Associates 7 Waterloo Ave. Guelph, ON N1H 3H2 Tel. (519) 822-1609 Fax (519) 822-5389 Email: [email protected] In association with Web: www.dougan.ca Ecological Outlook City of Guelph Natural Heritage Strategy Phase 1: Terrestrial Inventory Design & Defining Locally Significant Natural Areas Acknowledgements We would like to thank the members of the Technical Steering Committee (TSC) who have been an excellent resource and have guided and assisted in the development of this study and the overall Natural Heritage Strategy (NHS). The TSC has been structured to include members from diverse backgrounds with expertise in ecology and natural heritage planning, and will continue to play a key guiding role in subsequent phases. Currently, the TSC is comprised of the following individuals: ¾ Drew Cherry – Planner (Wellington County Stewardship Council) ¾ Astrid Clos – Planner (Guelph Development Association / Guelph and Area Homebuilder’s Association) ¾ Andrew Lambden – Developer (Guelph Development Association /Guelph and Area Homebuilder’s Association) ¾ Glynis Logue – Local Environmentalist (Green Plan Steering Committee/Guelph Environmental Leadership) ¾ Don Kudo – Manager of Infrastructure Planning (City of Guelph) ¾ Terry Schwan – Forester (Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources – OMNR) ¾ Helen White – Park Planner (City of Guelph) ¾ Val Wyatt – Local Naturalist/Consulting Ecologist (Guelph Field Naturalists) ¾ Tony Zammit – Ecologist or Fred Natolochny – Senior Planner (Grand River Conservation Authority – GRCA) In addition to their input through the TSC, the GRCA and OMNR (Guelph District) have provided base natural heritage data for this study.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Plant Diversity in Los Angeles, California: Species and Functional Type Turnover in Cultivated Landscapes
    Received: 30 November 2018 | Revised: 13 June 2019 | Accepted: 9 July 2019 DOI: 10.1002/ppp3.10067 RESEARCH ARTICLE Urban plant diversity in Los Angeles, California: Species and functional type turnover in cultivated landscapes Meghan Avolio1 | Diane E. Pataki2 | G. Darrel Jenerette3 | Stephanie Pincetl4 | Lorraine Weller Clarke3,5 | Jeannine Cavender‐Bares6 | Thomas W. Gillespie7 | Sarah E. Hobbie6 | Kelli L. Larson8 | Heather R. McCarthy9 | Tara L. E. Trammell10 1Department of Earth & Planetary Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA 2School of Biological Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA 3Department of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California Riverside, Riverside, CA, USA 4University of California Los Angeles Institute of the Environment and Sustainability, Los Angeles, CA, USA 5Prince George’s Community College, Largo, MD, USA 6Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA 7Department of Geography, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA 8School of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning and School of Sustainability, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA 9Department of Microbiology and Plant Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA 10Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA Correspondence Meghan Avolio, Department of Earth Societal Impact Statement & Planetary Sciences, Johns Hopkins People plant, remove, and manage urban vegetation in cities for varying purposes University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, USA. and to varying extents. The direct manipulation of plants affects the benefits peo‐ Email: [email protected] ple receive from plants. In synthesizing several studies of urban biodiversity in Los Funding information Angeles, we find that cultivated plants differ from those in remnant natural areas.
    [Show full text]
  • FLORISTIC QUALITY ASSESSMENT for VEGETATION in ILLINOIS a METHOD for ASSESSING VEGETATION INTEGRITY by John B
    FLORISTIC QUALITY ASSESSMENT FOR VEGETATION IN ILLINOIS A METHOD FOR ASSESSING VEGETATION INTEGRITY By John B. Taft, Gerould S. Wilhelm, Douglas M. Ladd, and Linda A. Masters Reprinted with the permission of the Illinois Native Plant Society ABSTRACT: Floristic Quality Assessment (FQA) is proposed as a method to assess floristic integrity in Illinois. For the application of FQA, each taxon in the Illinois vascular flora was assigned an integer from 0 to 10 termed a coefficient of conservatism (C). Two basic ecological tenets that the coefficients represent are that plant species differ in their tolerance to disturbance and disturbance types, and that plant species display varying degrees of fidelity to habitat integrity. With these principles as a guide, the coefficient applied to each taxon represents a rank based on observed behavior and patterns of occurrence in Illinois plant communities and our confidence that a taxon is remnant (natural area) dependent. Species given a C value of 0-1 are taxa adapted to severe disturbances, particularly anthropogenic disturbances, occurring so frequently that often only brief periods are available for growth and reproduction. Species ranked with a C value of 2-3 are associated with somewhat more stable, though degraded, environments. Those species with coefficients 4-6 include many dominant or matrix species for several habitats; they have a high consistency of occurrence within given community types. Species with C values 7-8 are taxa we associate mostly with natural areas, but that can be found persisting where the habitat has been degraded somewhat. Those species with coefficients 9-10 are considered to be restricted to high-quality natural areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Coefficients of Conservatism Values and the Floristic Quality Index for the Vascular Plants of South Florida
    U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Coefficients of Conservatism Values and the Floristic Quality Index for the Vascular Plants of South Florida Coefficients of Conservatism Values and the Floristic Quality Index for the Vascular Plants of South Florida Steve Mortellaro1, Mike Barry 2, George Gann3, John Zahina4, Sally Channon5, Charles Hilsenbeck6, Douglas Scofield7, George Wilder8 and Gerould Wilhelm9 1U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1339 20th Street, Vero Beach FL 32960 2U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Naples, FL (Formerly) 2Institute for Regional Conservation, 22601 S.W. 152 Ave., Miami, FL 33170 (Currently) 3Institute for Regional Conservation, 22601 S.W. 152 Ave., Miami, FL 33170 4 South Florida Water Management District, 3301 Gun Club Road, West Palm Beach, FL 5Palm Beach County Department of Environmental Resources Management, 2300 North Jog Rd, 4th Floor, West Palm Beach, FL 33411 6 17516 Birchwood Drive, Boca Raton, FL 33487 7University of California, Los Angeles, 1509 Life Sciences, Box 951786, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1786 8Naples Botanical Garden, 4820 Bayshore Drive, Naples, FL 34112 9Conservation Design Forum, Inc., 375 W. First Street, Elmhurst, IL 60126 January 2009 South Florida Ecological Services Field Office Vero Beach, Florida Table of Contents ABSTRACT.................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government BIODIVERSITY PLANNING Guidelines for the Perth Metropolitan Region
    Local Government BIODIVERSITY PLANNING Guidelines for the Perth Metropolitan Region Andrew Del Marco, Ryan Taylor, Karen Clarke, Kate Savage, Julia Cullity and Carla Miles June 2004 Addendum for the South West Biodiversity Project Area Adapted by Shaun Molloy, Trudy O’Connor, Jodie Wood, Sue Wallrodt December 2007 South West Biodiversity Project Western Australian Local Government Association ISBN 0-9599319-3-7 Published by Western Australian Local Government Association 15 Altona St West Perth WA 6005 08 9321 5055 © Western Australian Local Government Association & South West Biodiversity Project 2007 Every effort has been made to ensure that the information contained in this publication was correct at the time of printing. The publisher or the authors do not accept liability however arising, including liability for negligence, or for any loss resulting from the use of or reliance upon information in this book. Graphic design: Cogency, Shop 9, 330 South Terrace South Fremantle WA 6162 Ph 9433 1693 Typesetting: Par Excellence, Level 1, 220 St Georges Terrace, Perth WA 6000 Ph 9321 7899 Printing: Optima Digital Print, U18, 15 Carbon Court, Osborne Park WA 6017 Ph 9200 7700 Central cover photo of Karri Forest near Manjimup supplied by Lee Fontanini Acknowledgments In addition to the significant list of parties acknowledged in the Guidelines, the South West Biodiversity Project team and the Western Australian Local Government Association also acknowledges the following for their contribution to this Addendum: ` the authors of the Guidelines:
    [Show full text]