DOCSLIB.ORG

Download Paper

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Download Paper COMPUTATION OF DESTRUCTIVE SATELLITE RE-ENTRIES B. Fritsche, G. Koppenwallner HTG Hyperschall-Technologie Gotting¨ en, Max-Planck-Str. 19, 37191 Katlenburg-Lindau, Germany [email protected] ABSTRACT All these satellites will re-enter the Earth atmosphere un- controlled. The Tubsat satellite will burn-up completely. This is also probable for Abrixas and Champ, with their The software system SCARAB (’Spacecraft Atmo- masses about 500 kg, but a more refined analysis is cer- spheric Re-entry and Aerothermal Break-up’) is designed tainly required for Sax and Rosat, with masses of more to calculate the destruction of spacecraft during their re- than 1 ton. entry flight through the Earth atmosphere. This soft- ware has a modular structure, combining flight dynam- ics, aerothermodynamics, thermal analysis, and structural analysis. The software has been applied to several test 2. THE SCARAB SOFTWARE SYSTEM cases. Some results could be verified with in-flight mea- surements, other results were compared with other exist- ing re-entry prediction tools. Now we are working on The SCARAB S/W system [1–4] consists of several mod- ules: re-entry survivability studies for satellites at their end of a system manager with a menu-driven user interface, mission. Currently there are several satellites of interest in orbit which will make an uncontrolled re-entry dur- a geometry module for the construction of a spacecraft from elements and for the generation of surface panels, ing the next few years. For satellites without controlabil- ity the SCARAB S/W computes the satellite destruction a model definition module for the specification of history and the ground impact risk. For ’controlled re- model-dependent parameters (e.g. mass properties, ref- erence quantities), entries’ (uncontrolled re-entry after a de-orbit boost) the a material data module containing material data tables, computations can give recommendations for the choice four re-entry analysis modules (see below), of suitable entry conditions. The present paper presents results of current studies. a visualisation tool for animated view of the re-entry history. 1. INTRODUCTION 2.1. Flight dynamic analysis Earth-orbiting space objects which were not designed to The flight dynamics module of the SCARAB system survive a re-entry into the atmosphere, usually burn up analyses the motion of a spacecraft during its entry into during re-entry, but very heavy or compact ones or parts the Earth’s atmosphere. The analysis starts with user- thereof may survive and reach ground. If it is known defined initial conditions (state vector, atmospheric envi- that parts of a spacecraft will survive the re-entry, then ronment, etc.), and computes the position and the attitude the object should be de-orbited with a controlled maneu- of the spacecraft as function of time. The current flight vre, if this is possible. A recent example is the Comp- dynamic state is forwarded to the other SCARAB analy- ton Gamma Ray Observatory (CGRO), with a mass of sis modules. During entry, the thermal or the structural about 17 tons, which was de-orbited over the Northern analysis module are able to detect a spacecraft disinte- Pacific Ocean. A very acute case is the Russian space gration event, causing the original S/C to break-up into station Mir, with a mass of more then 130 tons. An- smaller parts. In this case the flight dynamic analysis other class of spacecraft comprises objects which are has to be terminated and, after generation of new mod- going to re-enter in an uncontrolled manner during the els for the S/C parts, to be restarted for each of the frag- next several years. Figure 1 shows the orbital height of ments separately. The flight dynamic computation will some of these satellites during the last two years. The stop again, if the traced fragment itself disintegrates, or if shown cases are: Abrixas, a X-ray satellite, moving un- it is destroyed by heating, or if the fragment hits ground. controlled since its malfunctioning shortly after launch in April 1999; Sax, another X-ray satellite; Rosat, also a The final motion of the fragments is computed on a prob- X-ray satellite, moving uncontrolled since its end of mis- abilistic basis with 3 degrees of freedom. The trajecto- sion in February 1999; Tubsat-N, a small ’nano’satellite ries are computed starting with the last point computed with communication functions; and Champ, which ex- with the full simulation. The geometry is projected onto plores the gravitational and magnetic field of the Earth. its principal axis of inertia. From these projected areas Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Space Debris, ESOC, Darmstadt, Germany, 19 - 21 March 2001 (ESA SP-473, August 2001) an effective body shape is determined to get the aerody- 3. RESULTS OF CURRENT STUDIES namic coefficients as function of Mach number and angle of attack. The ground dispersion is examined by comput- ing trajectories for the most probable and the most un- 3.1. Space Station Mir favourable set of coefficients. As result of the calcula- tions one gets a number of trajectories and corresponding The Russian space station Mir has been in orbit now for impact points, with the dispersion ellipse forming their 15 years. It’s now just the time that the station will be envelope. Using this information the on-ground casualty de-orbited1. With our SCARAB system it is possible to risk can be computed. perform a re-entry calculation of Mir. Unfortunately we could not get enough detailed data on the geometry and other properties of the station, like mass, moments of in- ertia, materials, etc. Therefore we could only do a very 2.2. Aerothermodynamic analysis simplified re-entry analysis of something that looks sim- ilar to the Mir station. Figure 2 shows our geometric model of the Mir. It takes into account all major parts The aerothermodynamic analysis module of the of the station: the modules Mir, Kvant, Kvant-2, Spektr, SCARAB system computes the aerodynamic forces Piroda, Kristall, and the Progress spacecraft; also the so- and moments acting on a spacecraft during re-entry. lar panels, and some antennas. So far we are near reality. It also computes the heat transfer due to convective Now, for a flight dynamic analysis we need the mass dis- heating by the ambient atmosphere. The forces and tribution in the station. But we have only the total mass moments are used by the flight dynamics analysis to (approximately). To have something more, it was as- determine trajectory and attitude history, and by the sumed that the mass distribution is uniform, i.e. the walls structural analysis to compute the mechanical loads on are of constant thickness for all parts. The value for this the spacecraft structure. The convective heat transfer is thickness was adjusted to get the right total mass for the used by the thermal analysis to determine the thermal material selected (aluminum). To start a calculation, the loads and the thermal response of the spacecraft. initial state vector is required. Relying on NASA infor- mation distributed via Internet (March 16) the following initial orbit data were used: Epoch: 03/22/01 05:48:31 GMT, apogee x perigee = 209.7 x 82.6 km, inclination: 51.66 deg, arg. of perigee: 2.3. Thermal analysis 239.7 deg. These data set corresponds to the conditions after the final of three de-orbit burns, the first starting at an altitude of approx. 218 km, about 5 hours before. The thermal analysis module of the SCARAB system analyses the thermal response of a spacecraft to exter- The first calculation carried out with the above mentioned nal heat input. It computes the internal heat flow from parameters did not yield meaningful results. The assump- the current temperature distribution, and it computes the tion that the total mass is distributed in equally-thick temperature changes resulting from the balance of all ex- walls yields too high heat capacities of the walls, thus ternal and internal heat flux terms. Considered are heat preventing them from reaching the melting temperature transfer by aerodynamic heating, thermal conduction and at a reasonable flight altitude. Therefore the model was radiative heat exchange (including back radiation to the re-defined, shifting the mass from the solar arrays (con- free stream). The thermal analysis also treats the phase taining about half of the total mass when all walls have change of the spacecraft material by melting, and it de- the same thickness) to the remaining parts, arriving at a tects local failures of the spacecraft assembly and issues thickness ratio of about 1:9 instead of 1:1. Figure 3 shows a destruction event message to the system, if such failure the computed geometry at an altitude of 60 km. All so- occurs. lar arrays with the reduced thickness are molten away. Figure 4 shows the flight altitude vs. time for this case. It can be seen that the station is ’captured’ by the atmo- sphere before reaching the perigee of its initial elliptical 2.4. Structural analysis orbit. The flight path after the end of the 6D calculation was computed with the 3D ground dispersion analysis. The variation in the ground impact location is due to the The structural analysis module of the SCARAB system probabilistic variation of the attitude in the 3D analysis, analyses the structural response of a spacecraft to me- where the attitude is not known deterministically. It has chanical loads. These loads are due to aerodynamic and to be noted that this variation corresponds to the ground inertial forces and moments. The structural analysis com- dispersion ellipse of ONE fragment. If the fragmentation putes the deformation of the spacecraft structure under of the space station would be considered, each fragment these loads.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Onboard Determination of Vehicle Glide Capability for Shuttle Abort Flight Managment (Safm)
    Source of Acquisition NASA Johnson Space Center ONBOARD DETERMINATION OF VEHICLE GLIDE CAPABILITY FOR SHUTTLE ABORT FLIGHT MANAGMENT (SAFM) Mark Jackson, Timothy Straube, Thomas Fill, Scott Nemeth, When one or more main engines fail during ascent, the flight crew of the Space Shuttle must make several critical decisions and accurately perform a series of abort procedures. One of the most important decisions for many aborts is the selection ofa landing site. Several factors influence the ability to reach a landing site, including the spacecraft point of atmospheric entry, the energy state at atmospheric entry, the vehicle glide capability from that energy state, and whether one or more suitable landing sites are within the glide capability. Energy assessment is further complicated by the fact that phugoid oscillations in total energy influence glide capability. Once the glide capability is known, the crew must select the "best" site option based upon glide capability and landing site conditions and facilities. Since most of these factors cannot currently be assessed by the crew in flight, extensive planning is required prior to each mission to script a variety of procedures based upon spacecraft velocity at the point of engine failure (or failures). The results of this pre­ flight planning are expressed in tables and diagrams on mission-specific cockpit checklists. Crew checklist procedures involve leafing through several pages of instructions and navigating a decision tree for site selection and flight procedures - all during a time critical abort situation. With the advent of the Cockpit Avionics Upgrade (CAU), the Shuttle will have increased on-board computational power to help alleviate crew workload during aborts and provide valuable situational awareness during nominal operations.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on Earth Atmospheric Entry for Mars Sample Return Missions
    NASA/TP–2006-213486 Notes on Earth Atmospheric Entry for Mars Sample Return Missions Thomas Rivell Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California September 2006 The NASA STI Program Office . in Profile Since its founding, NASA has been dedicated to the • CONFERENCE PUBLICATION. Collected advancement of aeronautics and space science. The papers from scientific and technical confer- NASA Scientific and Technical Information (STI) ences, symposia, seminars, or other meetings Program Office plays a key part in helping NASA sponsored or cosponsored by NASA. maintain this important role. • SPECIAL PUBLICATION. Scientific, technical, The NASA STI Program Office is operated by or historical information from NASA programs, Langley Research Center, the Lead Center for projects, and missions, often concerned with NASA’s scientific and technical information. The subjects having substantial public interest. NASA STI Program Office provides access to the NASA STI Database, the largest collection of • TECHNICAL TRANSLATION. English- aeronautical and space science STI in the world. language translations of foreign scientific and The Program Office is also NASA’s institutional technical material pertinent to NASA’s mission. mechanism for disseminating the results of its research and development activities. These results Specialized services that complement the STI are published by NASA in the NASA STI Report Program Office’s diverse offerings include creating Series, which includes the following report types: custom thesauri, building customized databases, organizing and publishing research results . even • TECHNICAL PUBLICATION. Reports of providing videos. completed research or a major significant phase of research that present the results of NASA For more information about the NASA STI programs and include extensive data or theoreti- Program Office, see the following: cal analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • FCC-20-54A1.Pdf
    Federal Communications Commission FCC 20-54 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Mitigation of Orbital Debris in the New Space Age ) IB Docket No. 18-313 ) REPORT AND ORDER AND FURTHER NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING Adopted: April 23, 2020 Released: April 24, 2020 By the Commission: Chairman Pai and Commissioners O’Rielly, Carr, and Starks issuing separate statements; Commissioner Rosenworcel concurring and issuing a statement. Comment Date: (45 days after date of publication in the Federal Register). Reply Comment Date: (75 days after date of publication in the Federal Register). TABLE OF CONTENTS Heading Paragraph # I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 1 II. BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................................... 3 III. DISCUSSION ...................................................................................................................................... 14 A. Regulatory Approach to Mitigation of Orbital Debris ................................................................... 15 1. FCC Statutory Authority Regarding Orbital Debris ................................................................ 15 2. Relationship with Other U.S. Government Activities ............................................................. 20 3. Economic Considerations .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Feasibility Study for Using Commercial Off the Shelf (COTS)
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 8-2011 A Feasibility Study for Using Commercial Off The Shelf (COTS) Hardware for Meeting NASA’s Need for a Commercial Orbital Transportation Services (COTS) to the International Space Station - [COTS]2 Chad Lee Davis University of Tennessee - Knoxville, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Aerodynamics and Fluid Mechanics Commons, Other Aerospace Engineering Commons, and the Space Vehicles Commons Recommended Citation Davis, Chad Lee, "A Feasibility Study for Using Commercial Off The Shelf (COTS) Hardware for Meeting NASA’s Need for a Commercial Orbital Transportation Services (COTS) to the International Space Station - [COTS]2. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2011. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/965 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Chad Lee Davis entitled "A Feasibility Study for Using Commercial Off The Shelf (COTS) Hardware for Meeting NASA’s Need for a Commercial Orbital Transportation Services (COTS) to the International Space Station - [COTS]2." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Aerospace Engineering.
    [Show full text]
  • An Ongoing Effort to Identify Near-Earth Asteroid Destination
    The Near-Earth Object Human Space Flight Accessible Targets Study: An Ongoing Effort to Identify Near-Earth Asteroid Destinations for Human Explorers Presented to the 2013 IAA Planetary Defense Conference Brent W. Barbee∗, Paul A. Abelly, Daniel R. Adamoz, Cassandra M. Alberding∗, Daniel D. Mazanekx, Lindley N. Johnsonk, Donald K. Yeomans#, Paul W. Chodas#, Alan B. Chamberlin#, Victoria P. Friedensenk NASA/GSFC∗ / NASA/JSCy / Aerospace Consultantz NASA/LaRCx / NASA/HQk / NASA/JPL# April 16th, 2013 Introduction I Near-Earth Objects (NEOs) are asteroids and comets with perihelion distance < 1.3 AU I Small, usually rocky bodies (occasionally metallic) I Sizes range from a few meters to ≈ 35 kilometers I Near-Earth Asteroids (NEAs) are currently candidate destinations for human space flight missions in the mid-2020s th I As of April 4 , 2013, a total of 9736 NEAs have been discovered, and more are being discovered on a continual basis 2 Motivations for NEA Exploration I Solar system science I NEAs are largely unchanged in composition since the early days of the solar system I Asteroids and comets may have delivered water and even the seeds of life to the young Earth I Planetary defense I NEA characterization I NEA proximity operations I In-Situ Resource Utilization I Could manufacture radiation shielding, propellant, and more I Human Exploration I The most ambitious journey of human discovery since Apollo I NEAs as stepping stones to Mars 3 NHATS Background I NASA's Near-Earth Object Human Space Flight Accessible Targets Study (NHATS) (pron.: /næts/) began in September of 2010 under the auspices of the NASA Headquarters Planetary Science Mission Directorate in cooperation with the Advanced Exploration Systems Division of the Human Exploration and Operations Mission Directorate.
    [Show full text]
  • Uranus Atmospheric Entry Studies Final
    Atmospheric Entry Studies for Uranus Parul Agrawal - ARC Gary Allen - ARC Helen Hwang -ARC Jose Aliaga - ARC Evgeniy Sklyanskiy - JPL MarkMarley - ARC Kathy McGuire - ARC LocHuynh - ARC Joseph Garcia - ARC Robert Moses- LaRC RickWinski - LaRC Funded by NASA In-Space Propulsion Program Questions and feedback : [email protected] Presentation: Outer Planet Assessment Group, Tucson, AZ, January 2014 Outline • Background ₋ Constraints ₋ Science Objectives ₋ Orbital Mechanics ₋ Atmosphere • Direct BallisticEntry • Aerocapture Entry • Conclusions& Recommendations 2 Background • Funded by Entry Vehicle Technology (EVT) project under In-Space Propulsion Technology (ISPT) • Concept studiesto understand the trade space for atmosphericentry, focusing on Venus, Saturn and Uranus ₋ Provide in-depth analysis of mission concepts outlined in the decadal survey for these planets ₋ These studies could be enabling for future Flagship and New Frontier missions designs • The results of this study will be published and presented at IEEE aerospace conference in Big Sky Montana, March 2014 In-Space Propulsion Technology (ISPT) . 3 Study Objectives • Establish a range of probe atmosphericentry environmentsbased on the UranusFlagship mission in the 2013-23 Planetary Science Decadal Survey ₋ Two Launch windows 2021 and 2034 are being considered for this study • Define Uranusentry trade space by performing parametricstudies, by varying ballisticcoefficient (vehicle mass, size) and Entry Flight Path Angle (EFPA) • Investigate entry trajectory options, including
    [Show full text]
  • Planned Yet Uncontrolled Re-Entries of the Cluster-Ii Spacecraft
    PLANNED YET UNCONTROLLED RE-ENTRIES OF THE CLUSTER-II SPACECRAFT Stijn Lemmens(1), Klaus Merz(1), Quirin Funke(1) , Benoit Bonvoisin(2), Stefan Löhle(3), Henrik Simon(1) (1) European Space Agency, Space Debris Office, Robert-Bosch-Straße 5, 64293 Darmstadt, Germany, Email:[email protected] (2) European Space Agency, Materials & Processes Section, Keplerlaan 1, 2201 AZ Noordwijk, Netherlands (3) Universität Stuttgart, Institut für Raumfahrtsysteme, Pfaffenwaldring 29, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany ABSTRACT investigate the physical connection between the Sun and Earth. Flying in a tetrahedral formation, the four After an in-depth mission analysis review the European spacecraft collect detailed data on small-scale changes Space Agency’s (ESA) four Cluster II spacecraft in near-Earth space and the interaction between the performed manoeuvres during 2015 aimed at ensuring a charged particles of the solar wind and Earth's re-entry for all of them between 2024 and 2027. This atmosphere. In order to explore the magnetosphere was done to contain any debris from the re-entry event Cluster II spacecraft occupy HEOs with initial near- to southern latitudes and hence minimise the risk for polar with orbital period of 57 hours at a perigee altitude people on ground, which was enabled by the relative of 19 000 km and apogee altitude of 119 000 km. The stability of the orbit under third body perturbations. four spacecraft have a cylindrical shape completed by Small differences in the highly eccentric orbits of the four long flagpole antennas. The diameter of the four spacecraft will lead to various different spacecraft is 2.9 m with a height of 1.3 m.
    [Show full text]
  • Post Increment Evaluation Report Increment 11 International Space
    SSP 54311 Baseline WWW.NASAWATCH.COM Post Increment Evaluation Report Increment 11 International Space Station Program Baseline June 2006 National Aeronautics and Space Administration International Space Station Program Johnson Space Center Houston, Texas Contract Number: NNJ04AA02C WWW.NASAWATCH.COM SSP 54311 Baseline - WWW.NASAWATCH.COM REVISION AND HISTORY PAGE REV. DESCRIPTION PUB. DATE - Initial Release (Reference per SSCD XXXXXX, EFF. XX-XX-XX) XX-XX-XX WWW.NASAWATCH.COM SSP 54311 Baseline - WWW.NASAWATCH.COM INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION PROGRAM POST INCREMENT EVALUATION REPORT INCREMENT 11 CHANGE SHEET Month XX, XXXX Baseline Space Station Control Board Directive XXXXXX/(X-X), dated XX-XX-XX. (X) CHANGE INSTRUCTIONS SSP 54311, Post Increment Evaluation Report Increment 11, has been baselined by the authority of SSCD XXXXXX. All future updates to this document will be identified on this change sheet. WWW.NASAWATCH.COM SSP 54311 Baseline - WWW.NASAWATCH.COM INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION PROGRAM POST INCREMENT EVALUATION REPORT INCREMENT 11 Baseline (Reference SSCD XXXXXX, dated XX-XX-XX) LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES Month XX, XXXX The current status of all pages in this document is as shown below: Page Change No. SSCD No. Date i - ix Baseline XXXXXX Month XX, XXXX 1-1 Baseline XXXXXX Month XX, XXXX 2-1 - 2-2 Baseline XXXXXX Month XX, XXXX 3-1 - 3-3 Baseline XXXXXX Month XX, XXXX 4-1 - 4-15 Baseline XXXXXX Month XX, XXXX 5-1 - 5-10 Baseline XXXXXX Month XX, XXXX 6-1 - 6-4 Baseline XXXXXX Month XX, XXXX 7-1 - 7-61 Baseline XXXXXX Month XX, XXXX A-1 - A-9 Baseline XXXXXX Month XX, XXXX B-1 - B-3 Baseline XXXXXX Month XX, XXXX C-1 - C-2 Baseline XXXXXX Month XX, XXXX D-1 - D-92 Baseline XXXXXX Month XX, XXXX WWW.NASAWATCH.COM SSP 54311 Baseline - WWW.NASAWATCH.COM INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION PROGRAM POST INCREMENT EVALUATION REPORT INCREMENT 11 JUNE 2006 i SSP 54311 Baseline - WWW.NASAWATCH.COM SSCB APPROVAL NOTICE INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION PROGRAM POST INCREMENT EVALUATION REPORT INCREMENT 11 JUNE 2006 Michael T.
    [Show full text]
  • The X-Ray Imaging Polarimetry Explorer
    Call for a Medium-size mission opportunity in ESA‟s Science Programme for a launch in 2025 (M4) XXIIPPEE The X-ray Imaging Polarimetry Explorer Lead Proposer: Paolo Soffitta (INAF-IAPS, Italy) Contents 1. Executive summary ................................................................................................................................................ 3 2. Science case ........................................................................................................................................................... 5 3. Scientific requirements ........................................................................................................................................ 15 4. Proposed scientific instruments............................................................................................................................ 20 5. Proposed mission configuration and profile ........................................................................................................ 35 6. Management scheme ............................................................................................................................................ 45 7. Costing ................................................................................................................................................................. 50 8. Annex ................................................................................................................................................................... 52 Page 1 XIPE is proposed
    [Show full text]
  • Max-Planck-Institut Für Extraterrestrische
    The X-ray Universe 2011, Berlin Max-Planck-Institut für extraterrestrische Physik Download this poster here: http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/~hbrunner/Berlin2011Poster.pdf eROSITA: all-sky survey data reduction, source characterization, and X-ray catalogue creation Hermann Brunner1, Thomas Boller1, Marcella Brusa1, Fabrizia Guglielmetti1, Georg Lamer2, Jan Robrade3, Christian Schmid4, Nico Cappelluti5, Francesco Pace6, Mauro Roncarelli7 1Max-Planck-Institut für extraterrestrische Physik, Garching, 2Leibniz-Institut für Astrophysik, Potsdam, 3Hamburger Sternwarte, 4Dr. Karl Remeis-Sternwarte und ECAP, 5INAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Bologna, 6Zentrum für Astronomie der Universität Heidelberg, 7Dipartimento di Astronomico, Università di Bologna eROSITA on SRG All-sky survey sensitivity eROSITA (extended Roentgen Survey with an Imaging Telescope Array) is the primary instrument on the Russian Spektrum-Roentgen-Gamma (SRG) mission, scheduled for launch in 2013. eROSITA consists of Effective area on axis 15´Background off-axis 30´off-axis seven Wolter-I telescope modules, each of which is equipped with 54 mirror shells with an outer diameter of 36 cm and a fast frame-store pn-CCD, resulting in a field-of-view (1o diameter) averaged PSF of 25´´-30´´ 1 keV HEW (on-axis: 15´´ HEW) and an effective area of 1500 cm2 at 1.5 keV. eROSITA/SRG will perform a four year long all-sky survey, to be followed be several years of pointed observations (Predehl et al. 2010). More info on eROSITA: http://www.mpe.mpg.de/erosita/ 4 keV eROSITA orbit and scanning strategy 7 keV Orbit: eROSITA/SRG will be placed in an Averaged all-sky survey PSF (examples) L2 orbit with a semi-major axis of about 1 million km and an orbital period of about 6 months.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring the Sky with Erosita
    Exploring the X-ray Sky with eROSITA for the eROSITA Team Observatories and mission timelines Basic Scientific Idea …. to extend the ROSAT all-sky survey up to 12 keV with an XMM type sensitivity Historical Development Spectrum-XG Jet-X, SODART, etc. ROSAT 1990-1998 First X-ray all-sky survey with an imaging telescope Negotiations between Roskosmos and ESA ABRIXAS 1999 on a "new" Spectrum-XG mission (2005) To extend the all-sky survey towards higher energies Agreement between Roskosmos and DLR (2007) ROSITA 2002 Spectrum-RG ABRIXAS science on the eROSITA International Space Station Dark Energy 105 Clusters of Galaxies extended ROentgen Survey with an Imaging Telescope Array Mission scenario & Instrument specification • 3 month calibration & science verification phase • 4 yrs all-sky survey (8 sky coverages) • 2.7 yrs pointed observations • Energy range 0.2 - 12 keV • FOV: 1 degree • All-sky survey sensitivity ~ 6 x10-14 erg cm-2 s-1 ~ (10 – 30) x ROSAT • Deep survey field(s) (~100 sqdeg) with 5×10-15 erg cm-2 s-1 • Temporal resolution ~ 50 ms • Energy resolution ~ 130 ev @ 6 keV / 80 ev @ 1.5 keV • Angular resolution ~ 15” (20” survey) eROSITA status: completely approved and funded Mr. Putin gets informed about Dark Energy... Signature of the "Detailed Agreement" (Reichle, Wörner, Perminov) 50:50 data share between Ru / Germany HERCULES BOOTES URSA MAIOR DRACO URSA MINOR LEO CEPHEUS VIRGO CASSIOPEIA CYGNUS AURIGA AQUILA GEMINI PERSEUS ANDROMEDA SCORPIUS PEGASUS SAGITTARIUS CENTAURUS TAURUS ORION VELA CRUX CANIS MAIOR AQUARIUS CARINA HEMISPHAERA ORIENTALIS HEMISPHAERA OCCIDENTALIS Actual definition depends on mission planning eROSITA: Launch date ….
    [Show full text]
  • The X-Ray Background and the ROSAT Deep Surveys
    THE X–RAY BACKGROUND AND THE ROSAT DEEP SURVEYS G. HASINGER Astrophysikalisches Institut Potsdam, An der Sternwarte 16, 14482 Potsdam, Germany E-mail : [email protected] G. ZAMORANI Osservatorio Astronomico, Via Zamboni 33, Bologna, 40126, Italy E-mail: [email protected] In this article we review the measurements and understanding of the X-ray back- ground (XRB), discovered by Giacconi and collaborators 35 years ago. We start from the early history and the debate whether the XRB is due to a single, homo- geneous physical process or to the summed emission of discrete sources, which was finally settled by COBE and ROSAT. We then describe in detail the progress from ROSAT deep surveys and optical identifications of the faint X-ray source popula- tion. In particular we discuss the role of active galactic nuclei (AGNs) as dominant contributors for the XRB, and argue that so far there is no need to postulate a hypothesized new population of X-ray sources. The recent advances in the under- standing of X-ray spectra of AGN is reviewed and a population synthesis model, based on the unified AGN schemes, is presented. This model is so far the most promising to explain all observational constraints. Future sensitive X-ray surveys in the harder X-ray band will be able to unambiguously test this picture. 1 Introduction It is a heavy responsibility for us, as it would be for everybody else, to write a paper on the X–ray Deep Surveys and the X–ray background (XRB) for this book, in honour of Riccardo Giacconi.
    [Show full text]