Sections 4, 5 Yucca Mountain Site Description

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sections 4, 5 Yucca Mountain Site Description YUCCA MOUNTAIN SITE DESCRIPTION BOOK 2 SECTION 4,5 RECIEVED WITH LETTER DATED 9/30/98 FILE CODE 102.8 ACCESSION # 9902040045 WBS: 1.2.3.9 QA: L Civilian Radioactive Waste Management System Management & Operating Contractor BOOK 2 - SECTIONS 4,5 YUCCA MOUNTAIN SITE DESCRIPTION BOOOOOOOO-01717-5700-00019 REV 00 September 1998 INFORMATION COPY LAS VEGAS DOCUMENT CONTROL Prepared for: U.S. Department of Energy Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Office P.O. Box 30307 North Las Vegas, Nevada 89036-0307 Prepared by: TRW Environmental Safety Systems Inc. 1261 Town Center Drive Las Vegas, Nevada 89134-6352 Under Contract Number DE-AC08-91RWO0134 ý10' (' -ý-1-/ q ý PA ý ý o45' Disclaimer This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. Yucca Mountain Site Description BOOOOOOOO-01717-5700-00019 REV 00 September 1998.. CONTENTS Page PREFACE ..................... ...................................... xiii ACRONYMS ............................................................ xv SYMBOLS/UNITS ..................................................... xvii 4. CLIMATOLOGY AND METEOROLOGY .................................. 4.1-1 4.1 PRESENT CLIMATE AND METEOROLOGY ........................ 4.1-1 4.1.1 Planetary-Scale Atmospheric Features ............................ 4.1-2 4.1.2 Description of Synoptic-Scale Features and Processes ............... 4.1-4 4.1.3 Regional and Site Climatology ............................... 4.1-5 4.1.3.1 Data Sources ................................... 4.1-5 4.1.3.2 Precipitation ...................................... 4.1-6 4.1.3.3 Temperature, Humidity, and Evaporation .................... 4.1-8 4.1.3.4 Wind ............................................ 4.1-9 4.1.4 Meteorological Monitoring Network ............................. 4.1-12 4.1.4.1 M eteorological Sites .................................. 4.1-13 4.1.4.2 M easurements ........................................ 4.1-14 4.1.4.3 Monitoring Program Database ......................... 4.1-15 4.1.4.4 Quality Assurance Activities .......................... 4.1-16 4.1.5 Climatological Summary ..................................... 4.1-16 4.2 PALEOCLIMATOLOGY ............................................ 4.2-1 4.2.1 Introduction ................................................. 4.2-1 4.2.2 Causes and the Nature of Global Quaternary Climate Change ......... 4.2-3 4.2.2.1 Relations of Climate Change to Factors Operating on Different Time Scales ....................................... 4.2-3 4.2.2.1.1 Orbital Parameters ............................ 4.2-4 4.2.2.1.2 Climate Variability: Factors That Can Vary Climate at Short Time Scales ............................. 4.2-6 4.2.2.1.3 Long Records of Climate Change-Linkages between Millennial-Scale Climate Change and Orbital Parameters ................................ 4.2-9 4.2.2.1.3.1 M arine Records ............................. 4.2-9 4.2.2.1.3.2 Ice-Core Records .......................... 4.2-11 4.2.3 Long Regional Records of Quaternary Climate Change ............. 4.2-12 4.2.3.1 Devils Hole ...................................... 4.2-12 4.2.3.2 Death Valley .......................................... 4.2-14 4.2.3.3 Owens Lake .. ...................................... 4.2-16 4.2.3.3.1 Climate Setting ............................ 4.2-16 4.2.3.3.2' Limnologic and Climatic Setting ................ 4.2-17 4.2.3.3.3 Climate Linkage to Owens Lake Chemistry ........ 4.2-18 4.2.3.3.4 Microfossils as Proxy Records of Solute Composition and Total Dissolved Solids ..................... 4.2-19 4.2.3.3.5 Chronology of the Owens Lake Record ........... 4.2-19 4.2.3.3.6 The Paleoclimate Record of Owens Lake ......... 4.2-20 iii Yucca Mountain Site Description BOOOOOOO-01717-5700-00019 REV 00 September 1998 CONTENTS (Continued) Page 4.2.3.3.7 Glacial and Interglacial Variability Documented by the Owens Lake Record .......................... 4.2-22 4.2.3.3.8 Correlation of Owens Lake Paleolimnology and Oxygen Isotope Records of Global Climate ........ 4.2-24 4.2.3.3.9 Owens Lake Conclusions ...................... 4.2-24 4.2.4 Local Records of Late Quaternary Climate Change ................. 4.2-25 4.2.4.1 Pack-Rat Middens ................. .................. 4.2-25 4.2.4.2 Wetland and Spring Deposits........................... 4.2-28 4.2.4.2.1 Corn Creek Flat Section OBI-1 1 Ostracode Data ... 4.2-28 4.2.4.2.2 Cactus Springs Section-Stable Isotope Data ....... 4.2-31 4.2.4.2.3 Lathrop Wells Diatomite Microfossil and Isotope Data ................................ 4.2-32 4.2.4.2.4 Summary of Local Records .................... 4.2-33 4.2.5.1 Secondary Mineral Deposits in the Yucca Mountain Tuffs .... 4.2-34 4.2.5.2 Stable Isotope Geochemistry of Secondary Calcite in the Unsaturated Zone .................................. 4.2-36 4.2.5.2.1 Controls on Infiltration 6'3C Values .............. 4.2-36 4.2.5.2.2 Controls on Infiltration 680 Values ............. 4.2-37 4.2.5.2.3 Formation and Distribution of Secondary Minerals.. 4.2-38 4.2.5.3 Secondary Mineral Evidence of Past Climates .............. 4.2-39 4.3 FUTURE CLIMATE VARIATION ................................... 4.3-1 4.3.1 M odeling .................................................. 4.3-1 4.3.2 Forecasting Using Paleoclimate Data ............................. 4.3-3 4.4 SUM M ARY ..................................................... 4.4-1 4.5 REFERENCES ................................................... 4.5-1 4.5.1 References Cited ............................................. 4.5-1 4.5.2 Codes, Standards, Regulations ................................. 4.5-15 5. HYDROLOGIC SYSTEM ................................................ 5.1-1 5.1 SURFACE WATER HYDROLOGY .................................. 5.1-1 5.1.1 Surface Water Bodies and Drainage Areas ........................ 5.1-1 5.1.1.1 Amargosa River System ................................ 5.1-1 5.1.1.2 Perennial Surface W ater ................................ 5.1-4 5.1.2 M onitoring Network .......................................... 5.1-5 5.1.3 Water-Control Structures and Diversions ......................... 5.1-7 5.1.4 Drainage Development, Paleohydrology, and Flood History ........... 5.1-8 5.1.4.1 Drainage Development ................................. 5.1-8 5.1.4.2 Paleohydrology ....................................... 5.1-8 5.1.4.2.1 Site and Subregional Paleohydrologic Studies ....... 5.1-8 5.1.4.2.2 Regional Paleohydrologic Studies ............... 5.1-10 iv Yucca Mountain Site Description BOOOOOOOO-01717-5700-00019 REV 00 September 1998. CONTENTS (Continued) Page 5.1.4.3 Streamgauge Flood Record ............................. 5.1-10 5.1.4.3.1 Site and Subregional Paleohydrologic Floodstream Studies ......................... 5.1-10 5.1.4.3.2 Regional Streamngauge Flood Studies 5.1-13 5.1.4.4 Streamgauge Volume Record .......................... 5.1-13 5.1.4.4.1 Site and Subregional Streamgauge Volume Studies 5.1-13 5.1.4.4.2 Regional Streamgauge Volume Studies .......... 5.1-14 5.1.5 Flood Potential .......................................... 5.1-15 5.1.5.1 Site and Subregional Flood Potential Studies ................ 5.1-15 5.1.5.2 Regional Flood Potential Studies ......................... 5.1-25 5.1.6 Chemistry of Surface Water ................................ 5. i-26 5.1.7 Location, Quantity, and Quality of Surface Water Extracted......... 5.1-30 5.1.8 Projected Surface Water Use ................................ 5.1-30 5.2 REGIONAL HYDROGEOLOGY .................................... 5.2-1 5.2.1 Flow System Boundaries and Hydrogeologic Units ................. 5.2-1 5.2.1.1 Boundaries of Regional Flow System ..................... 5.2-3 5.2.1.2 Boundaries of Subregional Flow System .......... ...... 5.2-4 5.2.1.3 Hydrogeologic Units ............................... 5.2-4 5.2.1.4 Hydraulic Properties of Hydrogeologic Units................ 5.2-9 5.2.1.5 Summary of Flow System Boundaries and Hydrogeologic Units 5.2-15 5.2.2 Potentiometric Levels and Hydraulic Gradients .................... 5.2-17 5.2.2.1 Previous Potentiometric-Surface Maps ................... 5.2-17 5.2.2.2 Current Potentiometric Surface ........... 5.2-22 5.2.2.3 Gradients and Potentiometric Features ................... 5.2-26 5.2.2.4 Summary of Potentiometric Levels and Hydraulic Gradients ... 5.2-27 5.2.3 Recharge and Discharge ...................................... 5.2-28 5.2.3.1 Characterizing the Recharge Component .................. 5.2-28 5.2.3.1.1 Previous Methods of Characterizing Recharge from Precipitation .............................. 5.2-29 5.2.3.1.2 Limitations of the Empirical Maxey-Eakin Method . 5.2-34 5.2.3.1.3. Modifying the Maxey-Eakin Method ............. 5.2-35 5.2.3.1'4 Accuracy of the Modified Maxey-Eakin Method . 5.2-38 5.2.3.1.5 Evaluation of Current
Recommended publications
  • NPCA Comments on Proposed Silurian
    Stanford MillsLegalClinic Environmental Law Clinic Crown Quadrangle LawSchool 559 Nathan Abbott Way Stanford, CA 94305-8610 Tel 650 725-8571 Fax 650 723-4426 www.law.stanford.edu September 9, 2014 Via Electronic Mail and Federal Express James G. Kenna, State Director Bureau of Land Management California State Office 2800 Cottage Way, Suite W-1623 Sacramento, CA 95825 (916) 978-4400 [email protected] Katrina Symons Field Manager Bureau of Land Management Barstow Field Office 2601 Barstow Road Barstow, CA 92311 (760) 252-6004 [email protected] Dear State Director Kenna and Field Manager Symons: Enclosed please find comments by the National Parks Conservation Association (“NPCA”) on the solar and wind projects proposed by Iberdrola Renewables, Inc., in Silurian Valley, California. We understand that the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”) is currently considering whether to grant the Silurian Valley Solar Project a variance under the October 2012 Record of Decision for Solar Energy Development in Six Southwestern States. We also understand that BLM is currently evaluating the Silurian Valley Wind Project under the National Environmental Policy Act. As the enclosed comments make clear, NPCA has serious concerns about the proposed projects’ compliance with applicable laws and policies, and about their potentially significant adverse effects on the Silurian Valley and surrounding region. We thank you for your consideration of these comments. NPCA looks forward to participating further in the administrative processes associated with the proposed projects. Respectfully submitted, Elizabeth Hook, Certified Law Student Community Law ❖ Criminal Defense ❖ Environmental Law ❖ Immigrants’ Rights ❖ International Human Rights and Conflict Resolution ❖ Juelsgaard Intellectual Property and Innovation ❖ Organizations and Transactions ❖ Religious Liberty ❖Supreme Court Litigation ❖ Youth and Education Law Project Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Garlock Fault: an Intracontinental Transform Structure, Southern California
    GREGORY A. DAVIS Department of Geological Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90007 B. C. BURCHFIEL Department of Geology, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77001 Garlock Fault: An Intracontinental Transform Structure, Southern California ABSTRACT Sierra Nevada. Westward shifting of the north- ern block of the Garlock has probably contrib- The northeast- to east-striking Garlock fault uted to the westward bending or deflection of of southern California is a major strike-slip the San Andreas fault where the two faults fault with a left-lateral displacement of at least meet. 48 to 64 km. It is also an important physio- Many earlier workers have considered that graphic boundary since it separates along its the left-lateral Garlock fault is conjugate to length the Tehachapi-Sierra Nevada and Basin the right-lateral San Andreas fault in a regional and Range provinces of pronounced topogra- strain pattern of north-south shortening and phy to the north from the Mojave Desert east-west extension, the latter expressed in part block of more subdued topography to the as an eastward displacement of the Mojave south. Previous authors have considered the block away from the junction of the San 260-km-long fault to be terminated at its Andreas and Garlock faults. In contrast, we western and eastern ends by the northwest- regard the origin of the Garlock fault as being striking San Andreas and Death Valley fault directly related to the extensional origin of the zones, respectively. Basin and Range province in areas north of the We interpret the Garlock fault as an intra- Garlock.
    [Show full text]
  • Late Quaternary Stratigraphy and Luminescence Geochronology of the Northeastern Mojave Desert
    ARTICLE IN PRESS Quaternary International 166 (2007) 61–78 Late Quaternary stratigraphy and luminescence geochronology of the northeastern Mojave Desert Shannon A. Mahana,Ã, David M. Millerb, Christopher M. Mengesc, James C. Younta aUnited States Geological Survey, Box 25046 MS 974, Denver, CO 80225, USA bUnited States Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Road, MS 973, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA cUnited States Geological Survey, 520 N. Park Ave., Tucson, AZ 85719-5035, USA Available online 8 January 2007 Abstract The chronology of the Holocene and late Pleistocene deposits of the northeastern Mojave Desert have been largely obtained using radiocarbon ages. Our study refines and extends this framework using optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) to date deposits from Valjean Valley, Silurian Lake Playa, Red Pass, and California Valley. Of particular interest are eolian fine silts incorporated in ground- water discharge (GWD) deposits bracketed at 185–140 and 20–50 ka. Alluvial fan deposits proved amenable for OSL by dating both eolian sand lenses and reworked eolian sand in a matrix of gravel that occurs within the fan stratigraphy. Lacustrine sand in spits and bars also yielded acceptable OSL ages. These OSL ages fill gaps in the geochronology of desert deposits, which can provide data relevant to understanding the responses of several depositional systems to regional changes in climate. This study identifies the most promising deposits for future luminescence dating and suggests that for several regions of the Mojave Desert, sediments from previously undated landforms can be more accurately placed within correct geologic map units. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 1. Introduction Previous chronologic studies in the northeastern Mojave Desert area include magneto-stratigraphic studies and Extracting paleoclimatic and paleoenvironmental infor- tephrochronology of the upper Pliocene to middle Quatern- mation from terrestrial deposits is an important area of ary Tecopa beds (Hillhouse, 1987; Sarna-Wojcicki et al., Quaternary geologic research.
    [Show full text]
  • Is There Any Evidence of Mega-Lake Manly in the Eastern Mojave Desert During Oxygen Isotope Stage 5E/6?
    Quaternary Research 57, 177–179 (2002) doi:10.1006/qres.2001.2299, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on REPLY Is There Any Evidence of Mega-Lake Manly in the Eastern Mojave Desert during Oxygen Isotope Stage 5e/6? I am pleased to have the opportunity to defend and clarify the implication that Ku’s dates are more reliable than those of my hypothesis regarding the extent of the Blackwelder stand of Hooke and Lively (see Hooke and Dorn, 1992) is debatable, Lake Manly during marine oxygen isotope stage 6 (OS6). Let given that both use the -counting technique and thus may suffer me start by addressing a couple of general points. from problems with U migration. First, with reference to the pejorative prefix “mega” in Enzel Salt Spring Hills shoreline. Enzel et al. maintain that this et al.’s comment, let me put the size of the lake under discussion shoreline is cut into colluvium and, at its southeastern end, into in perspective. If water were to fill Death Valley to the 90-m alluvial fan deposits. I agree with the former. On the other hand, level today, the surface area would be 1600 km2 (Meek, 1997), air photos, a map in Anderson and Wells (1997), and my own whereas the area Hale proposed, based on overflow at Ash Hill observations do not support the interpretation that it is cut into an pass, would have been 8000 km2 (Hale, 1985). The surface alluvial fan at its southeastern end. Even if further study shows area of the OS6 lake proposed in my paper is 2800 km2, less that it is, however, Enzel et al.’s statements about the age of than half the size of Hale’s lake and less than twice the size a the fan unit are misleading (1) because they are based on dates 90-m lake would have were it to occupy the valley today.
    [Show full text]
  • UC Riverside UC Riverside Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UC Riverside UC Riverside Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Competing Models for the Timing of Cryogenian Glaciation: Evidence From the Kingston Peak Formation, Southeastern California Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3ph3f3ps Author Mrofka, David Douglas Publication Date 2010 Supplemental Material https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3ph3f3ps#supplemental Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE Competing Models for the Timing of Cryogenian Glaciation: Evidence From the Kingston Peak Formation, Southeastern California A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy In Geological Sciences By David Douglas Mrofka August 2010 Dissertation Committee: Dr.Martin J. Kennedy, Chairperson Dr. Mary M. Droser Dr.Richard A. Minnich Copyright by David Douglas Mrofka 2010 The Dissertation of David Douglas Mrofka is approved: Committee Chairperson ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, I thank my advisor, Martin J. Kennedy, for his patience, commitment to communicating the importance of scientific thinking, consistent honest criticism and unwavering interest in my many academic endeavors. He never failed to provide me with the funding and analytical facilities needed to better investigate a wide range of geological questions. More importantly, he inspired me to better understand Earth history in general and during the Neoproterozoic specifically. I deeply appreciate his friendship and obvious commitment to my development. I am deeply thankful to Mary L. Droser for her consistent support, encouragement and friendship. I was honored to learn about Australia and the Ediacaran Fauna under her guidance at the beginning of my graduate work. She has been an unwavering supporter and source of practical advice for understanding both ―real‖ and academic life.
    [Show full text]
  • West Mojave Route Management Plan, Historic Properties Treatment Plan, Attachment 5: Historic Trails Context Study FINAL VERSION May 2019
    West Mojave Route Management Plan, Historic Properties Treatment Plan, Attachment 5: Historic Trails Context Study FINAL VERSION May 2019 Prepared for: United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management California Desert District Office 22835 Calle San Juan de Los Lagos Moreno Valley, California 92553 Prepared by: Diane L. Winslow, M.A., RPA, Shannon Davis, M.A., RPH, Sherri Andrews, M.A., RPA, Marilyn Novell, M.S., and Lindsey E. Daub, M.A., RPA 2480 N. Decatur Blvd., Suite 125 Las Vegas, NV 89108 (702) 534-0375 ASM Project Number 29070 West Mojave Route Management Plan, Historic Properties Treatment Plan, Attachment 5: Historic Trails Context Study Prepared for: United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management California Desert District Office 22835 Calle San Juan de Los Lagos Moreno Valley, California 92553 Prepared by: Diane L. Winslow, M.A., RPA, Shannon Davis, M.A., RPH, Sherri Andrews, M.A., RPA, Marilyn Novell, M.S., and Lindsey E. Daub, M.A., RPA ASM Affiliates, Inc. 2480 North Decatur Boulevard, Suite 125 Las Vegas, Nevada 89108 May 2019 PN 29070 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page MANAGEMENT SUMMARY ................................................................................. v 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................. 1 2. LITERATURE REGARDING TRAILS, ROADS, AND HIGHWAYS ............... 7 3. DEFINING TRAILS, ROADS, AND HIGHWAYS ........................................... 9 4. PREHISTORIC, PROTO-HISTORIC, AND
    [Show full text]
  • \Q-Nr BULLETIN of the SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PALEONTOLOGICAL SOCIETY Vol.8, No.12 (December 1976), P.173-182 EARLY CAMBRIAN FAUNAS
    \Q-nr BULLETIN OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PALEONTOLOGICAL SOCIETY vol.8, no.12 (December 1976), p.173-182 EARLY CAMBRIAN FAUNAS FROM EASTERN SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1 by Jack D. Mount . ,T, L^, ft A. J," , -•••• >.. 1 . ' Introduction Moderately to highly fossiliferous lower Cambrian clastic and carbonate rocks crop out at localities scattered throughout much of the Mojave Desert in eastern San Bernardino County, California. The original discovery of fossil- iferous lower Cambrian rocks was made in the southern end of the Marble Mountains about 3.3 kilometers northeast of the railroad siding of Cadiz. Similar sections have since been located in the Providence, Kelso, New York and Mesquite Mountains and Silurian and Salt Spring Hills, all in eastern San Bernardino County. The present report, which is the fifth in a series of preliminary notes making known the results of my research on the faunas from these rocks, figures 29 Early Cambrian fossils, more than tripling the number of taxa known prior to the initiation of my studies. Previous Studies More than 40 formal and informal papers, notes and abstracts have been published dealing with aspects of the paleontology and stratigraphy of the study area; however, only the more useful references are described as follows. Darton (1907, 1915) first described the lower Cambrian section in the southern Marble Mountains as part of his study of the geology along the route of the Santa Fe Railroad. Clark (1921) described in more detail this same section and listed 4 trilobite taxa. Using Clark's original collection from the classical locality near the old Vaughan Quarry at the.
    [Show full text]
  • Late Cenozoic Crustal Extension and Magmatism, Southern Death Valley Region, California
    Geological Society of America Field Guide 2 2000 Late Cenozoic crustal extension and magmatism, southern Death Valley region, California J.P. Calzia U.S. Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Road, Menlo Park, California 94025 USA O.T.Ramo Department of Geology, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 11, FTN-00014, Finland ABSTRACT The late Cenozoic geologic history of the southern Death Valley region is characterized by coeval crustal ex­ tension and magmatism. Crustal extension is accommodated by numerous listric and planar normal faults as well as right- and left-lateral strike slip faults. The normal faults dip 30°-50°W near the surface and flatteri and merge at depth into a detachment zone at or near the contact between Proterozoic cratonic rocks and Proterozoic and Pa­ leozoi_c miogeoclinal rocks; the strike-slip faults act as tear faults between crustal blocks that have extended at dif­ ferent times and at different rates. Crustal extension began 13.4-13.1 Ma and migrated northwestward with time; undef'ormed basalt flows and lacustrine deposits suggest that extension stopped in this region (but continued north of the Death Valley graben) between 5 and 7 Ma. Estimates of crustal extension in this region vary from 30-50 per­ cent to more than 100 percent. Magmatic rocks syntectonic with crustal extension in the southern Death Valley region include 12.4-6.4 Ma granjtic rocks as well as bimodal14.~.0 Ma volcanic rocks. Geochemical and isotopic evidence suggest that the granjtic rocks get younger and less alkalic from south to north; the volcanic rocks become more mafic with less evidence of crustal interaction as they get younger.
    [Show full text]
  • Kou^I J > 19 %0 PALEONTOLOGICAL TOUR of the MOJAVE DESERT
    Kou^i J > 19 %0 PALEONTOLOGICAL TOUR OF THE MOJAVE DESERT, CALIFORNIA-NEVADA Southern California Paleontological Society Special Publ., no. 2, 1980, pp. 19-29 CHARACTERISTICS OF EARLY CAMBRIAN FAUNAS FROM EASTERN SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA by Jack D. Mount1 Invertebrate PaJeo-^c^^y • , ' • Earth Sciences D^v^s^n Introduction Natural History Museum Moderately to highly fossiliferous lower Cambrian clastic and carbonate rocks crop out at localities scattered throughout much of the Mojave Desert in eastern San Bernardino County, California. This relatively thin succession of strata is representative of the Craton facies of the Cordilleran geocline and rests on crystalline basement rocks of Early Precambrian age. The original discovery of fossiliferous lower Cambrian rocks was made more than 70 years ago in the southern end of the Marble Mountains about 3.3 kilometers northeast of the rail- road siding of Cadiz. Similar sections have since been located in the Providence, Kelso, New York and Mesquite Mountains, the Mescal Range, and the Silurian and Salt Spring Hills, all in eastern San Bernardino County. The present report, which is seventh in a series of preliminary notes making known the results of my research on the faunas from these rocks, lists 35 Early Cambrian fossils, which is four times the number of taxa known prior to the initiation of my studies. Previous Studies More than 40 formal and informal papers, notes and abstracts have been published dealing with aspects of the paleontology and stratigraphy of the study area; however, only the more useful references are discussed here: Darton (1907, 1915) first described the lower Cambrian section in the southern Marble Mountains (he called them the Iron Mountains) as part of his study of the geology along the route of the Santa Fe Railroad.
    [Show full text]
  • Avawatz Range for Probably Twenty Years
    Geology of the Death Valley Region South Coast Geological Society Guidebook Vol. 16, 1988 GEOLOGY AND f1INERAL RESOURCES OF THE AVAW.\ TZ ~~OUNTAINS RESOURCE AREA, SAN BERNARDINO CO UNTY, CALIFnRNI A Larry Vredenburgh, u.S. Bureau of Land Management Bakersfield, Calif ornia SLM MARY Located in the northeastern Mojave Desert at the southern end of Death Valley, the 276,480 acre Avawatz Mountains GRA encompasses an area of diverse geology and mineral resources. Thick sedimentary sequences of Precambrian, Precambrian-cambrian, Paleozoic and Mesozoic rocks have been intruded by Jurassic volcanic rocks and Mesozoic plutonic rocks. During Tertiary time extrusive volcanics and hypabyssal dikes and plugs intruded all older rocks in the Soda Mountains. Sediment were again depo.sited in Tertiary time. A wide diversity of metallic and non-metallic minerals have been produced and prospected. The most profitable and productive deposits have been iron and talc, although gold and silver have been the most eagerly sought. Commoditie.s known from this area i nclude: iron, gold, silver, lead, zinc, copper, molybdenum., bari te, talc, gypsum, salt, celestite, bentonite, and sand and gravel. There is poten~ial for uranium and zeo­ lites. Presently iron is produced and there is renewed exploration for silver in the central Avawatz Mountains. r:IGURE 1 . INDEX t1AP AVAhATZ MOUNTAI NS GF.~1 RESOl!RCF, AREA 30 5 INTRODl£TION The Avawatz Mountains Geology-Energy-Mineral Resource Area ( GRA) is lo­ cated in the northeastern Mojave Desert at the southern end of Death Valley, California. This area comprises about 276,480 acres (432 sq. mi., 1,119 sq.km.) and embraces the Avawatz Mountains, Soda Mountains, and Red Pass Range.
    [Show full text]
  • K-Ar Thermochronology of a Mesozoic Plutonic Complex, Avawatz Mountains, Southeastern California J.E
    K-Ar thermochronology of a Mesozoic plutonic complex, Avawatz mountains, southeastern California J.E. Spencer Isochron/West, Bulletin of Isotopic Geochronology, v. 48, pp. 3-8 Downloaded from: https://geoinfo.nmt.edu/publications/periodicals/isochronwest/home.cfml?Issue=48 Isochron/West was published at irregular intervals from 1971 to 1996. The journal was patterned after the journal Radiocarbon and covered isotopic age-dating (except carbon-14) on rocks and minerals from the Western Hemisphere. Initially, the geographic scope of papers was restricted to the western half of the United States, but was later expanded. The journal was sponsored and staffed by the New Mexico Bureau of Mines (now Geology) & Mineral Resources and the Nevada Bureau of Mines & Geology. All back-issue papers are available for free: https://geoinfo.nmt.edu/publications/periodicals/isochronwest This page is intentionally left blank to maintain order of facing pages. K-Ar THERMOCHRONOLOGY OF A MESOZOIC PLUTONIC COMPLEX, AVAWATZ MOUNTAINS, SOUTHEASTERN CALIFORNIA JON E. SPENCER Arizona Bureau of Geology and Mineral Technology, Tucson, AZ 85719 The Avawatz Mountains are located at the southern end types dated, the quartz monzonite of Cave Spring Wash of Death Valley In the northeastern Mojave Desert region of contains one to several percent pyroxene which could not southeastern California. The eighteen conventional K-Ar be completely separated from the hornblende, raising the dates reported here reveals long and complex cooling possibility that excess argon trapped in pyroxene resulted history. in an anomalously old age. GEOLOGY. The crystalline rocks forming most of the Younger ages were obtained from all other samples.
    [Show full text]
  • Old Spanish Trail Association, Has Been in Existence for Several Years
    Draft National Historic Trail Feasibility Study and Environmental Assessment July 2000 OLD SPANISH TRAIL New Mexico · Colorado · Utah · Arizona · Nevada · California United States Department of the Interior ? National Park Service Draft National Historic Trail Feasibility Study and Environmental Assessment July 2000 OLD SPANISH TRAIL New Mexico · Colorado · Utah · Arizona · Nevada · California United States Department of the Interior ? National Park Service ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The National Park Service thanks the technical team and others who assisted in the preparation and review of this document. In the interest of historical accuracy, these people generously shared their knowledge of the history and resources of the Old Spanish Trail. The participation of these people has improved the document and will serve future generations well. SUMMARY The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and desirability of designating the Old Spanish Trail as a National Historic Trail under the study provisions of the National Trails System Act (Public Law 90-543, 16 USC 1241, et seq.). Pioneered by Mexican trader Antonio Armijo in 1829, the Old Spanish Trail was a horse and burro pack route that connected Santa Fe and Los Angeles. In its early years, trappers, slavers, traders, and immigrants used parts or all of the Old Spanish Trail. Other variants of the Old Spanish Trail developed as travelers sought adequate water, grazing, shorter distances, smoother terrain, and safer passage. Over time, multiple, parallel, and intertwined routes developed. Many of these routes followed older trails developed by American Indians, and were later followed by Spanish, Mexican, and other Euro- American explorers. After 1848, use of the eastern end of the trail diminished as the California Trail to the north and southern trails across Arizona became the primary routes to California.
    [Show full text]