Abbreviations & Symbols Specialty Gas Equipment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Abbreviations & Symbols Specialty Gas Equipment Specialty Gas Equipment Abbreviations & Symbols Symbol Chemical Name Symbol Chemical Name Al2O3 Aluminum Oxide CH3SH Methyl Mercaptan Ar Argon CH4 Methane AsH3 Arsine B F Boron 11 Trifluoride CHClF2 Chlorodifluoromethane 11 3 (Halocarbon 22) B2H6 Diborane BCl Boron Trichloride CHCl2F Dichlorofluoromethane 3 (Halocarbon 21) BF3 Boron Trifluoride CHF3 Trifluoromethane (Halocarbon 23) C2ClF5 Chloropentafluoroethane (Halocarbon 115) Cl2 Chlorine C2Cl2F4 1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane (Halocarbon 114) CO Carbon Monoxide C2F6 Hexafluoroethane (Halocarbon 116) CO2 Carbon Dioxide C2H2 Acetylene C H F 1,1-Difluoroethylene (Halocarbon 1132A) COCl2 Phosgene 2 2 2 COS Carbonyl Sulfide C2H3CIF2 1-Chloro-1, 1-Difluoroethane (Halocarbon 142B) D2 Deuterium C2H4 Ethylene Fe2O3 Iron Oxide C2H4F2 1,1-Difluoroethane (Halocarbon 152A) H2 Hydrogen C2H4O Ethylene Oxide H2O Water C2H5Cl Ethyl Chloride H2S Hydrogen Sulfide C2H6 Ethane H2SiCl2 Dichlorosilane C2H6O Dimethyl Ether C F Perfluoropropane (Halocarbon 218) HCl Hydrogen Chloride 3 8 HD Hydrogen Deuteride C3H4 Allene (Propadiene) C3H6 Propylene He Helium Hg Mercury C3H6O Propylene Oxide HSiCl3 Trichlorosilane C3H6O Vinyl Methyl Ether K2O Potassium Oxide C3H8 Propane C4F8 Octafluorocyclobutane (Halocarbon C-318) Kr Krypton MgO Magnesium Oxide C4H6 1,3-Butadiene N2 Nitrogen C4H6 Ethyl Acetylene N2O Nitrous Oxide C4H8 1-Butene C4H8 cis-2-Butene N2O4 Nitrogen Tetroxide C H Isobutylene Na2O Sodium Oxide 4 8 Ne Neon C4H8 Trans-2-Butene NH3 Ammonia C4H10 Butane C4H10 Isobutane NO Nitric Oxide NO2 Nitrogen Dioxide C5H12 Isopentane CaO Calcium Oxide O2 Oxygen PF5 Phosphorous Pentafluoride CBrF3 Bromotrifluoromethane (Halocarbon 13B1) CClF3 Chlorotrifluoromethane (Halocarbon 13) PH3 Phosphine SF6 Sulfur Hexafluoride CCl2FCClF2 1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifluoroethane (Halocarbon 113) Si Silicon SiCl4 Silicon Tetrachloride CCl2F2 Dichlorodifluoromethane (Halocarbon 12) SiF4 Silicon Tetrafluoride SiH4 Silane CCl3F Trichlorofluoromethane (Halocarbon 11) SiO2 Silicon Dioxide CF4 Tetrafluoromethane (Halocarbon 14) SO2 Sulfur Dioxide CH3Cl Methyl Chloride Xe Xenon Specialty Gas Equipment Abbreviations & Symbols Cont. Symbol Symbol A G Å Angstrom(s) g gram(s) AA Atomic Absorption gal gallon(s) abs absolute GC Gas Chromatography or ACGIH American Conference of Chromatograph Governmental Industrial Hygienists GMIS Gas Manufacturers Intermediate ASTM American Society for Testing Standard Materials GPA Gas Processors Association atm atmosphere(s) avg average H Hall Electrolytic Conductivity Detector B HAP Hazardous Air Pollutants bp boiling point HID Helium lonization Detector Btu British thermal unit(s) hr hour Hz hertz C CAA Clean Air Act I cal calorie(s) ICP Inductively Coupled Plasma CAS Chemical Abstract Services (Spectroscopy) ccm cubic centimeter(s) per minute ID Identification or inside diameter ccs cubic centimeter(s) per second in, ins inch(es) CEM Continuous Emission Monitor in3, cu in cubic inch(es) cf cubic feet CFCs Chlorofluorocarbons J CFR Code of Federal Regulations J joule CGA Compressed Gas Association K cm centimeter(s) cm2 square centimeter K Kelvin cm3, cc cubic centimeter kg kilogram(s) COA Certificate of Analysis kPa Kilo pascal(s) COC Certificate of Conformance ºK degree(s) Kelvin CP Chemically Pure L Cp specific heat at constant pressure L liter(s) Cv specific heat at constant volume lb pound(s) Cv coefficient of flow LC Liquid Chromatography ºC degree(s) Celsius Lpm liters per minute D M DID Discharge lonization Detector ␮ micron(s), 10-5m DIN Deutsche Industrie Normen m3 cubic meter(s) (German Industrial Standards) mA milliampere DISS Diameter Index Safety System max maximum DOT Department of Transportation mg milligram(s) E min minute(s) ea each ml milliliter(s) ECD Electron Capture Detector mm millimeter(s) EPA Environmental Protection Agency MNPT Male National Pipe Thread mol.wt. molecular weight F MOS Metal Oxide Semiconductor ºF degree(s) Fahrenheit MW molecular weight FID Flame lonization Detector mp melting point FNPT Female National Pipe Thread MS Mass Spectrometry F.O.B. Freight on Board MSD Mass Selective Detector FPD Flame Photometric Detector MVCR Male VCR ft foot, feet MVFS Male Vacuum Face Seal 3 ft , cu ft Cubic foot (feet) N FTIR Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrometer or Spectroscopy N/A not applicable FIFRA Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and nbp normal boiling point Rodenticide Act NDIR Non-Dispersive Infrared Analyzer Specialty Gas Equipment Abbreviations & Symbols Cont. Symbol Symbol NDUV Non-Dispersive Ultraviolet Analyzer S NER normal evaporation rate SCC standard cubic centimeters NF National Formulary sccm standard cubic centimeters per NFPA National Fire Protection Association minute NIST National Institute of Standards and sccs standard cubic centimeters per Technology second nm nanometer(s) scfh standard cubic feet per hour No number scfm standard cubic feet per minute nom nominal scfs standard cubic feet per second NOS not otherwise specified sec second(s) NPD Nitrogen/Phosphorous Detector SFC Supercritical Fluid Chromatography NPT National Pipe Thread SFE Supercritical Fluid Extraction NTP Normal temperature and pressure slpm standard liters per minute NTRM NIST Traceable Reference Material sp. gr. specific gravity NMR Nuclear Magnetic Resonance sp. vol. specific volume Spectroscopy SRM Standard Reference Materials O SS Stainless Steel Stn. Stl. Stainless Steel OD outside diameter STEL Short Term Exposure Limit Ohm-cm ohms centimeter STP standard temperature and pressure OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration T oz ounce(s) TCD Thermal Conductivity Detector P TEA Transversely Excited Atmosphere THC Total Hydrocarbon Content Pa pascal(s) TLV Threshold Limit Value PID Photo Ionization Detector tp triple point ppb part(s) per billion TPH Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ppba part(s) per billion atomic TWA Time Weighted Average ppbv part(s) per billion by volume ppbw part(s) per billion by weight U ppm part(s) per million UHP Ultra High Purity ppma part(s) per million atomic UN United Nations ppmv part(s) per million by volume USP United States Pharmacopoeia ppmw part(s) per million by weight UPC Ultra Pure Carrier ppt parts(s) per trillion ppta Parts(s) per trillion atomic V pptv Parts(s) per trillion by volume VAC volts alternating current pptw Parts(s) per trillion by weight VDC volts direct current psi pound(s)-force per square inch VOC Volatile Organic Compounds psia pound(s)-force per square inch Vol volume absolute Vol% volume percent psig pound(s)-force per square inch gauge W w.c. water column pressure R wt. weight Ra Roughness average wt% weight percent RFO restricted flow orifice wt. ppm weight parts per million ºR degree(s) Rankine Y yd yard(s) > greater than < less than.
Recommended publications
  • Selective Production of Phase-Separable Product from a Mixture of Biomass-Derived Aqueous Oxygenates
    ARTICLE DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-07593-0 OPEN Selective production of phase-separable product from a mixture of biomass-derived aqueous oxygenates Yehong Wang 1, Mi Peng2, Jian Zhang1, Zhixin Zhang1, Jinghua An1,3, Shuyan Du1, Hongyu An1,3, Fengtao Fan1, Xi Liu 4,5, Peng Zhai2, Ding Ma 2 & Feng Wang1 1234567890():,; Selective conversion of an aqueous solution of mixed oxygenates produced by biomass fermentation to a value-added single product is pivotal for commercially viable biomass utilization. However, the efficiency and selectivity of the transformation remains a great challenge. Herein, we present a strategy capable of transforming ~70% of carbon in an aqueous fermentation mixture (ABE: acetone–butanol–ethanol–water) to 4-heptanone (4- HPO), catalyzed by tin-doped ceria (Sn-ceria), with a selectivity as high as 86%. Water (up to 27 wt%), detrimental to the reported catalysts for ABE conversion, was beneficial for producing 4-HPO, highlighting the feasibility of the current reaction system. In a 300 h continuous reaction over 2 wt% Sn-ceria catalyst, the average 4-HPO selectivity is main- tained at 85% with 50% conversion and > 90% carbon balance. This strategy offers a route for highly efficient organic-carbon utilization, which can potentially integrate biological and chemical catalysis platforms for the robust and highly selective production of value-added chemicals. 1 State Key Laboratory of Catalysis, Dalian National Laboratory for Clean Energy, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian 116023, China. 2 College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering and College of Engineering, BIC-ESAT, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Trace Hydrocarbon Impurities in 1,3-Butadiene Using Optimized Rt®-Alumina BOND/MAPD PLOT Columns by Rick Morehead, Jan Pijpelink, Jaap De Zeeuw, Tom Vezza
    Petroleum & Petrochemical Applications Analysis of Trace Hydrocarbon Impurities in 1,3-Butadiene Using Optimized Rt®-Alumina BOND/MAPD PLOT Columns By Rick Morehead, Jan Pijpelink, Jaap de Zeeuw, Tom Vezza Abstract Identifying and quantifying trace impurities in 1,3-butadiene is critical in producing high quality synthetic rubber products. Stan- dard analytical methods employ alumina PLOT columns which yield good resolution for low molecular weight hydrocarbons, but suffer from irreproducibility and poor sensitivity for polar hydrocarbons. In this study, Rt®-Alumina BOND/MAPD PLOT columns were used to separate both common light polar contaminants, including methyl acetylene and propadiene, as well as 4-vinylcy- clohexene, which is a high molecular weight impurity that normally requires a second test on an alternative column. By using an extended temperature program that employs the full thermal range of the column, 4-vinylcyclohexene, as well as all of the typical low molecular weight impurities in 1,3-butadiene, can be analyzed in a single test. Introduction 1,3-butadiene is typically isolated from products of the naphtha steam cracking process. Prior to purification, 1,3-butadiene can be contaminated with significant amounts of isobutene as well as other C4 isomers. In addition to removing these C4 isomeric contaminants during purification, it is also important that 1,3-butadiene be free of propadiene and methyl acetylene, which can interfere with catalytic polymerization. Alumina PLOT columns are the most commonly used GC column for this application, but the determination of polar hydrocarbon impurities at trace levels can be quite challenging and is highly dependent on the deactiva- tion of the alumina surface.
    [Show full text]
  • SAFETY DATA SHEET Halocarbon R-503
    SAFETY DATA SHEET Halocarbon R-503 Section 1. Identification GHS product identifier : Halocarbon R-503 Other means of : Not available. identification Product type : Liquefied gas Product use : Synthetic/Analytical chemistry. SDS # : 007306 Supplier's details : Airgas USA, LLC and its affiliates 259 North Radnor-Chester Road Suite 100 Radnor, PA 19087-5283 1-610-687-5253 24-hour telephone : 1-866-734-3438 Section 2. Hazards identification OSHA/HCS status : This material is considered hazardous by the OSHA Hazard Communication Standard (29 CFR 1910.1200). Classification of the : GASES UNDER PRESSURE - Liquefied gas substance or mixture HAZARDOUS TO THE OZONE LAYER - Category 1 GHS label elements Hazard pictograms : Signal word : Warning Hazard statements : Contains gas under pressure; may explode if heated. May cause frostbite. May displace oxygen and cause rapid suffocation. Harms public health and the environment by destroying ozone in the upper atmosphere. Precautionary statements General : Read and follow all Safety Data Sheets (SDS’S) before use. Read label before use. Keep out of reach of children. If medical advice is needed, have product container or label at hand. Close valve after each use and when empty. Use equipment rated for cylinder pressure. Do not open valve until connected to equipment prepared for use. Use a back flow preventative device in the piping. Use only equipment of compatible materials of construction. Always keep container in upright position. Prevention : Not applicable. Response : Not applicable. Storage : Protect from sunlight. Store in a well-ventilated place. Disposal : Refer to manufacturer or supplier for information on recovery or recycling. Hazards not otherwise : Liquid can cause burns similar to frostbite.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tritium Beta-Ray Induced Reactions in Deuterium Oxide Vapor and Hydrogen Or Carbon Monoxide and the Exchange of H-Atoms with Water Molecules
    This dissertation has been microfilmed exactly as received 66-6232 BIBLER, Ned Eugene, 1937- THE TRITIUM BETA-RAY INDUCED REACTIONS IN DEUTERIUM OXIDE VAPOR AND HYDROGEN OR CARBON MONOXIDE AND THE EXCHANGE OF H-ATOMS WITH WATER MOLECULES. The Ohio State University, Ph.D., 1965 Chemistry, physical University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan THE TRITIUM 3ETA-RAY INDUCED REACTIONS IN DEUTERIUM OXIDE VAPOR AND HYDROGEN OR CARBON MONOXIDE AND THE EXCHANGE OF H-ATOMS WITH WATER MOLECULES DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Ned Eugene B ib le r , B .S ., M.S * * * * * The Ohio S ta te U n iversity 1965 Approved by Adviser Department of Chemistry ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Several groups were influential in the completion of this work and the culmination of my graduate career at the Ohio State University. I have singled out two who deserve special acknowledg­ ment. I wish to express my appreciation to the members of my family for their understanding and sympathetic guidance during this demanding period. In particular, I thank my wife, Jane, who was a source of encouragement, for her devotion, scientific advice, and unswervingly honest criticism ; and my mother in law, Mrs. Pauline Pycraft, who typed a major portion of the first draft of this thesis. I am indebted to the stimulating research group headed by Dr. R. F. Firestone for many fruitful discussions and altercations on an array of subjects, including the radiation chemistry of water vapor. Specifically, I thank Dr. Firestone for his keen interest and set of high scientific standards which, when applied to the course and completion of this study, made it a maturing and g r a tify in g experience.
    [Show full text]
  • Next Generation PLOT Alumina Technology for Accurate Measurement of Trace Polar Hydrocarbons in Hydrocarbon Streams
    Next generation PLOT alumina technology for accurate measurement of trace polar hydrocarbons in hydrocarbon streams Jaap de Zeeuw, Tom Vezza, Bill Bromps, Rick Morehead and Gary Stidsen Restek Corporation, Bellefonte, USA 1 Next generation PLOT alumina technology for accurate measurement of trace polar hydrocarbons in hydrocarbon streams Jaap de Zeeuw, Tom Vezza, Bill Bromps, Rick More head and Gary Stidsen Restek Corporation Summary In light hydrocarbon analysis, the separation and detection of traces of polar hydrocarbons like acetylene, propadiene and methyl acetylene is very important. Using commercial alumina columns with KCl or Na2SO4 deactivation, often results in low response of polar hydrocarbons. Additionally, challenges are observed in response-in time stability. Solutions have been proposed to maximize response for components like methyl acetylene and propadiene, using alumina columns that were specially deactivated. Operating such columns showed still several challenges: Due to different deactivations, the retention and loadability of such alumina columns has been drastically reduced. A new Alumina deactivation technology was developed that combined the high response for polar hydrocarbon with maintaining the loadability. This allows the high response for components like methyl acetylene, acetylene and propadiene, also to be used for impurity analysis as well as TCD type applications. Such columns also showed excellent stability of response in time, which was superior then existing solutions. Additionally, it was observed that such alumina columns could be used up to 250 C, extending the Tmax by 50C. This allows higher hydrocarbon elution, faster stabilization and also widens application scope of any GC where multiple columns are used. In this poster the data is presented showing the improvements made in this important application field.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 1951 National Bureau of Standards
    Annual Report 1951 National Bureau of Standards Miscellaneous Publication 204 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Charles Sawyer, Secretary NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS A. V. Astint, Director Annual Report 1951 National Bureau of Standards For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office Washington 2 5, D. C. Price 50 cents CONTENTS Page 1. General Review 1 2. Electricity 16 Beam intensification in a high-voltage oscillograph 17, Low-temperature dry cells 17, High-rate batteries 17, Battery additives 18. 3. Optics and Metrology 18 The kinorama 19, Measurement of visibility for aircraft 20, Antisubmarine aircraft searchlights 20, Resolving power chart 20, Refractivity 21, Thermal expansivity of aluminum alloys 21. 4. Heat and Power . 21 Thermodynamic properties of materials 22, Synthetic rubber and other high polymers 23, Combustors for jet engines 24, Temperature and composition of flames 25, Engine "knock" 25, Low-temperature physics 26, Medical physics instrumentation 28. 5. Atomic and Radiation Physics 28 Atomic standard of length 29, Magnetic moment of the proton 29, Spectra of artificial elements 31, Photoconductivity of semiconductors 31, Radiation detecting instruments 32, Protection against radiation 32, X-ray equipment 33, Atomic and molecular ions 35, Electron physics 35, Tables of nuclear data 35, Atomic energy levels 36. 6. Chemistry 36 Radioactive carbohydrates 36, Dextran as a substitute for blood plasma 37, Acidity and basicity in organic solvents 37, Interchangeability of fuel gases 38, Los Angeles "smog" 39, Infrared spectra of alcohols 39, Electrodeposi- tion 39, Development of analytical methods 40, Physical constants 42. 7. Mechanics 42 Turbulent flow 43, Turbulence at supersonic speeds 43, Dynamic properties of materials 43, High-frequency vibrations 44, Hearing loss 44, Physical properties by sonic methods 44, Water waves 46, Density currents 46, Precision weighing 46, Viscosity of gases 46, Evaporated thin films 47.
    [Show full text]
  • Synthesis of Phosphine-Functionalized Metal
    DISS. ETH NO. 23507 Understanding and improving gold-catalyzed formic acid decomposition for application in the SCR process A thesis submitted to attain the degree of DOCTOR OF SCIENCES of ETH ZURICH (Dr. sc. ETH Zurich) presented by MANASA SRIDHAR M. Sc. in Chemical Engineering, University of Cincinnati born on 12.12.1987 citizen of India accepted on the recommendation of Prof. Dr. Jeroen A. van Bokhoven, examiner Prof. Dr. Oliver Kröcher, co-examiner Prof. Dr. Christoph Müller, co-examiner 2016 “anything can happen, in spite of what you’re pretty sure should happen.” Richard Feynman Table of content Abstract .............................................................................................................................. II die Zusammenfassung ..................................................................................................... VI Chapter 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 2 Methods ............................................................................................................ 15 Chapter 3 Unique selectivity of Au/TiO2 for ammonium formate decomposition under SCR- relevant conditions ............................................................................................................. 25 Chapter 4 Effect of ammonia on the decomposition of ammonium formate and formic acid on Au/TiO2 .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • BENZENE Disclaimer
    United States Office of Air Quality EPA-454/R-98-011 Environmental Protection Planning And Standards June 1998 Agency Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 AIR EPA LOCATING AND ESTIMATING AIR EMISSIONS FROM SOURCES OF BENZENE Disclaimer This report has been reviewed by the Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and has been approved for publication. Mention of trade names and commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation of use. EPA-454/R-98-011 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page LIST OF TABLES.....................................................x LIST OF FIGURES.................................................. xvi EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.............................................xx 1.0 PURPOSE OF DOCUMENT .......................................... 1-1 2.0 OVERVIEW OF DOCUMENT CONTENTS.............................. 2-1 3.0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION ...................................... 3-1 3.1 NATURE OF POLLUTANT..................................... 3-1 3.2 OVERVIEW OF PRODUCTION AND USE ......................... 3-4 3.3 OVERVIEW OF EMISSIONS.................................... 3-8 4.0 EMISSIONS FROM BENZENE PRODUCTION ........................... 4-1 4.1 CATALYTIC REFORMING/SEPARATION PROCESS................ 4-7 4.1.1 Process Description for Catalytic Reforming/Separation........... 4-7 4.1.2 Benzene Emissions from Catalytic Reforming/Separation .......... 4-9 4.2 TOLUENE DEALKYLATION AND TOLUENE DISPROPORTIONATION PROCESS ............................ 4-11 4.2.1 Toluene Dealkylation
    [Show full text]
  • "Fluorine Compounds, Organic," In: Ullmann's Encyclopedia Of
    Article No : a11_349 Fluorine Compounds, Organic GU¨ NTER SIEGEMUND, Hoechst Aktiengesellschaft, Frankfurt, Federal Republic of Germany WERNER SCHWERTFEGER, Hoechst Aktiengesellschaft, Frankfurt, Federal Republic of Germany ANDREW FEIRING, E. I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., Wilmington, Delaware, United States BRUCE SMART, E. I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., Wilmington, Delaware, United States FRED BEHR, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, St. Paul, Minnesota, United States HERWARD VOGEL, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, St. Paul, Minnesota, United States BLAINE MCKUSICK, E. I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., Wilmington, Delaware, United States 1. Introduction....................... 444 8. Fluorinated Carboxylic Acids and 2. Production Processes ................ 445 Fluorinated Alkanesulfonic Acids ...... 470 2.1. Substitution of Hydrogen............. 445 8.1. Fluorinated Carboxylic Acids ......... 470 2.2. Halogen – Fluorine Exchange ......... 446 8.1.1. Fluorinated Acetic Acids .............. 470 2.3. Synthesis from Fluorinated Synthons ... 447 8.1.2. Long-Chain Perfluorocarboxylic Acids .... 470 2.4. Addition of Hydrogen Fluoride to 8.1.3. Fluorinated Dicarboxylic Acids ......... 472 Unsaturated Bonds ................. 447 8.1.4. Tetrafluoroethylene – Perfluorovinyl Ether 2.5. Miscellaneous Methods .............. 447 Copolymers with Carboxylic Acid Groups . 472 2.6. Purification and Analysis ............. 447 8.2. Fluorinated Alkanesulfonic Acids ...... 472 3. Fluorinated Alkanes................. 448 8.2.1. Perfluoroalkanesulfonic Acids
    [Show full text]
  • Supplement of Compilation and Evaluation of Gas Phase Diffusion Coefficients of Reactive Trace Gases in the Atmosphere
    Supplement of Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 5585–5598, 2015 http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/15/5585/2015/ doi:10.5194/acp-15-5585-2015-supplement © Author(s) 2015. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Supplement of Compilation and evaluation of gas phase diffusion coefficients of reactive trace gases in the atmosphere: Volume 2. Diffusivities of organic compounds, pressure-normalised mean free paths, and average Knudsen numbers for gas uptake calculations M. J. Tang et al. Correspondence to: M. J. Tang ([email protected]) and M. Kalberer ([email protected]) The copyright of individual parts of the supplement might differ from the CC-BY 3.0 licence. Table of Contents 1 Alkanes and cycloalkanes ............................................................................................ 1 1.1 CH 4 (methane), C 2H6 (ethane), and C 3H8 (propane) ............................................. 1 1.2 C 4H10 (butane, methyl propane) ............................................................................ 3 1.3 C 5H12 (n-pentane, methyl butane, dimethyl butane) ............................................. 5 1.4 C 6H14 (n-hexane, 2,3-dimethyl butane) ................................................................ 7 1.5 C 7H16 (n-heptane, 2,4-dimethyl pentane).............................................................. 9 1.6 C 8H18 (n-octane, 2,2,4-trimethyl pentane) .......................................................... 11 1.7 C 9H20 (n-nonane), C 10 H22 (n-decane, 2,3,3-trimethyl heptane) and C 12 H26 (n- dodecane) .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ETHYLENE PLANT ENHANCEMENT (April 2001)
    Abstract Process Economics Program Report 29G ETHYLENE PLANT ENHANCEMENT (April 2001) The prospects for ethylene demand remain strong but much of the future increase in production capacity may come from incremental enhancement of existing plants, rather than from new “grass-roots” production facilities. Steam cracking for ethylene originated as early as the 1920s and was commercialized in the 1950s. The importance of ethylene continues to drive research and development of this technology along with the exploration of nonconventional technologies in order to achieve higher yields of olefins and lower capital and operating costs. However, as recently discussed in PEP Report 29F, Ethylene by Nonconventional Processes (August 1998), it is unlikely nonconventional processes will replace steam cracking for ethylene production in the foreseeable future. This study examines potential improvements in conventional steam cracker operations with emphasis on improving the competitive edge of existing plants. Ethane, LPG and naphtha are the dominant steam cracker feedstocks. Natural gas condensate is abundant in North America and the Middle East while naphtha is commonly used in Asia and Europe. Since the 1970s many new ethylene plants have been built with feedstock flexibility. In PEP Report 220, Ethylene Feedstock Outlook (May 1999), SRIC currently projects that generally ethylene feedstocks supply will be adequate over the next decade even considering that the demand for ethylene is increasing twice as fast as petroleum refining (4- 5%/year versus 2%/year). Significant technological developments exist for all sections of the ethylene steam cracker that could be implemented in plant revamps. Examples include new large capacity yet compact and efficient furnaces; coke inhibition technology; larger, more efficient compressors; fractionation schemes; mixed refrigerants; and advance control and optimization systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Supporting Information for Modeling the Formation and Composition Of
    Supporting Information for Modeling the Formation and Composition of Secondary Organic Aerosol from Diesel Exhaust Using Parameterized and Semi-explicit Chemistry and Thermodynamic Models Sailaja Eluri1, Christopher D. Cappa2, Beth Friedman3, Delphine K. Farmer3, and Shantanu H. Jathar1 1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA, 80523 2 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA, 95616 3 Department of Chemistry, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA, 80523 Correspondence to: Shantanu H. Jathar ([email protected]) Table S1: Mass speciation and kOH for VOC emissions profile #3161 3 -1 - Species Name kOH (cm molecules s Mass Percent (%) 1) (1-methylpropyl) benzene 8.50×10'() 0.023 (2-methylpropyl) benzene 8.71×10'() 0.060 1,2,3-trimethylbenzene 3.27×10'(( 0.056 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene 3.25×10'(( 0.246 1,2-diethylbenzene 8.11×10'() 0.042 1,2-propadiene 9.82×10'() 0.218 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene 5.67×10'(( 0.088 1,3-butadiene 6.66×10'(( 0.088 1-butene 3.14×10'(( 0.311 1-methyl-2-ethylbenzene 7.44×10'() 0.065 1-methyl-3-ethylbenzene 1.39×10'(( 0.116 1-pentene 3.14×10'(( 0.148 2,2,4-trimethylpentane 3.34×10'() 0.139 2,2-dimethylbutane 2.23×10'() 0.028 2,3,4-trimethylpentane 6.60×10'() 0.009 2,3-dimethyl-1-butene 5.38×10'(( 0.014 2,3-dimethylhexane 8.55×10'() 0.005 2,3-dimethylpentane 7.14×10'() 0.032 2,4-dimethylhexane 8.55×10'() 0.019 2,4-dimethylpentane 4.77×10'() 0.009 2-methylheptane 8.28×10'() 0.028 2-methylhexane 6.86×10'()
    [Show full text]