Databáze Živočišné Rdna

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Databáze Živočišné Rdna MASARYKOVA UNIVERZITA Přírodovědecká fakulta Biofyzikální ústav AVČR, v.v.i. Databáze živočišné rDNA Disertační práce Jana Sochorová Školitel: RNDr. Aleš Kovařík, CSc. Brno, 2019 Bibliografický záznam Jméno a příjmení autora: Ing. Jana Sochorová Biofyzikální ústav AVČR, v.v.i. Název disertační práce: Databáze živočišné rDNA Studijní program: Biochemie Studijní obor: Genomika a proteomika Školitel: RNDr. Aleš Kovařík, CSc. Biofyzikální ústav AVČR, v.v.i. Akademický rok: 2018/2019 Počet stran: 92 Klíčová slova: 5S rDNA, 45S rDNA, databáze, hybridizace in situ, karyotyp Bibliographic entry Author: Ing. Jana Sochorová Institute of Biophysics of the CAS, v.v.i. Title of Dissertation: Animal rDNA database Degree Programme: Biochemistry Field of Study: Genomics and proteomics Supervisor: RNDr. Aleš Kovařík, CSc. Institute of Biophysics of the CAS, v.v.i. Akademic Year: 2018/2019 Number of Pages: 92 Keywords: 5S rDNA, 45S rDNA, database, in situ hybridization, karyotyp Abstrakt Ribozomální DNA (rDNA), která kóduje 5S a 45S (18S-5.8S-26S) rRNA, je důležitou součástí eukaryotických chromozomů, počet a pozice lokusů rDNA se však liší. V důsledku nárůstu počtu publikací o živočišné rDNA (více než 600 publikací do roku 2017) vyvstala potřeba data zpřehlednit, zpřístupnit a statisticky je vyhodnotit. Proto jsme vytvořili Databázi živočišné rDNA, která udává informace o počtech a poloze lokusů rDNA na chromozomech. Shromážděná data z hybridizací in situ (s radioaktivním i fluorescenčním značením) metafázních chromozomů (mitotických i meiotických) zahrnují informace o karyotypech obratlovců (ryby, plazi, ptáci, obojživelníci a savci) a bezobratlých (hmyz a měkkýši). Další skupiny jsou zastoupené pouze několika druhy. Databáze živočišné rDNA je přístupná na internetové stránce http://www.animalrdnadatabase.com/. V databázi se nachází informace o počtu a pozici 5S a 45S rDNA ve více než 1 700 karyotypech (>300 čeledích). rDNA může být lokalizována na kterémkoliv typu chromozomu, včetně pohlavních chromozomů (X, Y, Z a W), B chromozomů a mikrochromozomů. Medián počtu lokusů rDNA má hodnotu kolem dvou lokusů na diploidní počet chromozomů, navzdory velké variabilitě počtu lokusů. Největší variabilitu v počtu lokusů 45S vykazují ryby (1 až 27 45S/ 1C), nejvíce variabilní v počtu lokusů 5S rDNA jsou plazi (1 až 37 5S/ 1C). Počet lokusů a velikost genomu nevykazují žádnou korelaci, stejně tak i počet lokusů 5S a 45S. V každé skupině živočichů se vyskytují všechny základní pozice rDNA na chromozomech. Pozice lokusu 45S rDNA je většinou terminální (>60% karyotypů) kromě druhů z kmene členovců, které vykazují většinou pericentromerickou pozici, a to především v řádu Orthoptera. Pozice 5S rDNA je více variabilní než 45S. Internetová stránka Databáze živočišné rDNA zaznamenala od roku 2017 více než 2200 přístupů. Aktualizace databáze, která je plánovaná na rok 2019, jistě přinese ohlas vědecké veřejnosti. Abstract Ribosomal DNA (rDNA) loci encoding 5S and 45S (18S-5.8S-26S) rRNA are important components of eukaryotic chromosomes varying both in numbers and locations. Accumulation of cytogenetic information on animal rDNA loci (more than 600 papers published until 2017) resulted in an increased demand for its archiving, public accessibility and the robust statistical analysis. We therefore took effort and constructed the Animal rDNA database containing information about the number and position of rDNA loci on animal chromosomes. The collected data are based on in situ hybridisation studies (both radioactive and fluorescent) of metaphase chromosomes (both mitotic and meiotic) carried out in major groups of vertebrates (fish, reptiles, birds, amphibians and mammals) and invertebrates (insects and mollusks). Other groups of animals (such as the worms) are only minor represented. The Animal rDNA database is publicly accessible via a web-based interphase at http://www.animalrdnadatabase.com/. The database contains cytogenetic information about 5S and 45S rDNA loci in more than 1 700 animal karyotypes (species coming from >300 families). rDNA loci can occur on any chromosome type including autosomes, sex chromosomes (X, Y, Z and W), supernumerary B chromosomes and microchromosomes. Statistical evaluation indicates that the median number of rDNA sites per diploid genome is close to two despite large interspecies variation. Fishes have the greatest variability in the number of 45S rDNA loci (2 to 54 sites/2C). Among the 5S loci the highest variability was recorded in reptiles (2 to 74 sites/2C). There is no significant correlation between the number of rDNA loci and genome size and also between the number of 5S and 45S rDNA loci in karyotypes. Each group contained rDNA sites at any chromosome location. The most prevalent position of 45S rDNA loci is terminal (>60% karyotypes) with the exception of arthropods, where the pericentromeric location is more frequent, particularly in the Orthoptera order. The position of 5S rDNA loci is generally more variable than the position of 45S rDNA loci. We observed that the internet page of the Animal rDNA database is viable and has been contacted for more 2200 times since its establishment in 2017. We are optimistic in that its next update scheduled to 2019 will receive attention from the scientific community. © Jana Sochorová, Masarykova univerzita, 2019 Obsah 1 Literární úvod ............................................................................................................9 1.1 Ribozomální DNA ...............................................................................................9 1.2 Názvosloví rDNA a rRNA ................................................................................. 10 1.3 Struktura rDNA ................................................................................................. 10 1.4 5S rDNA............................................................................................................ 12 1.5 45S rDNA .......................................................................................................... 13 1.6 Pseudogeny a orphony ....................................................................................... 15 1.7 Metody detekce rDNA. ...................................................................................... 15 1.8 Eukaryotický chromozom .................................................................................. 16 1.9 Lokalizace rDNA na chromozomech ................................................................. 17 1.10 Využití rDNA................................................................................................. 18 1.11 Modely evoluce rDNA ................................................................................... 18 1.11.1 Model birth-and-death ................................................................................ 18 1.11.2 Model koncertované evoluce ...................................................................... 19 1.12 rDNA prokaryot ............................................................................................. 20 1.13 Struktura lokusů 45S a 5S rDNA u eukaryot................................................... 21 1.14 rDNA kvasinek .............................................................................................. 21 1.15 Rostlinná rDNA ............................................................................................. 22 1.16 Živočišná rDNA ............................................................................................. 23 1.17 Biologické databáze ....................................................................................... 24 1.17.1 Databáze nukleových kyselin ...................................................................... 26 1.17.2 Sekundární databáze ................................................................................... 27 1.17.3 Genomové databáze .................................................................................... 27 1.17.4 Databáze velikosti genomů a počtu chromozomů ........................................ 28 1.17.5 Databáze, zabývající se rDNA a rRNA ....................................................... 29 1.17.6 Další databáze............................................................................................. 30 1.17.7 Meta Databáze ............................................................................................ 30 2 Cíle disertační práce ................................................................................................. 31 3 Materiál a metody .................................................................................................... 32 3.1 Vyhledávání informací ....................................................................................... 32 7 3.2 Tvorba a statistická analýza databáze ................................................................. 33 3.3 Konstrukce webové stránky ............................................................................... 33 4 Výsledky .................................................................................................................. 34 4.1 Internetová podoba databáze živočišné rDNA .................................................... 34 4.2 Statistické vyhodnocení výsledků databáze ........................................................ 36 4.2.1 Druhové složení databáze ........................................................................... 36 4.2.2 Analýza počtu lokusů rDNA ....................................................................... 37 4.2.3 Pozice rDNA
Recommended publications
  • An Inventory of Short Horn Grasshoppers in the Menoua Division, West Region of Cameroon
    AGRICULTURE AND BIOLOGY JOURNAL OF NORTH AMERICA ISSN Print: 2151-7517, ISSN Online: 2151-7525, doi:10.5251/abjna.2013.4.3.291.299 © 2013, ScienceHuβ, http://www.scihub.org/ABJNA An inventory of short horn grasshoppers in the Menoua Division, West Region of Cameroon Seino RA1, Dongmo TI1, Ghogomu RT2, Kekeunou S3, Chifon RN1, Manjeli Y4 1Laboratory of Applied Ecology (LABEA), Department of Animal Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Dschang, P.O. Box 353 Dschang, Cameroon, 2Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture and Agronomic Sciences (FASA), University of Dschang, P.O. Box 222, Dschang, Cameroon. 3 Département de Biologie et Physiologie Animale, Faculté des Sciences, Université de Yaoundé 1, Cameroun 4 Department of Biotechnology and Animal Production, Faculty of Agriculture and Agronomic Sciences (FASA), University of Dschang, P.O. Box 222, Dschang, Cameroon. ABSTRACT The present study was carried out as a first documentation of short horn grasshoppers in the Menoua Division of Cameroon. A total of 1587 specimens were collected from six sites i.e. Dschang (265), Fokoue (253), Fongo – Tongo (267), Nkong – Ni (271), Penka Michel (268) and Santchou (263). Identification of these grasshoppers showed 28 species that included 22 Acrididae and 6 Pyrgomorphidae. The Acrididae belonged to 8 subfamilies (Acridinae, Catantopinae, Cyrtacanthacridinae, Eyprepocnemidinae, Oedipodinae, Oxyinae, Spathosterninae and Tropidopolinae) while the Pyrgomorphidae belonged to only one subfamily (Pyrgomorphinae). The Catantopinae (Acrididae) showed the highest number of species while Oxyinae, Spathosterninae and Tropidopolinae showed only one species each. Ten Acrididae species (Acanthacris ruficornis, Anacatantops sp, Catantops melanostictus, Coryphosima stenoptera, Cyrtacanthacris aeruginosa, Eyprepocnemis noxia, Gastrimargus africanus, Heteropternis sp, Ornithacris turbida, and Trilophidia conturbata ) and one Pyrgomorphidae (Zonocerus variegatus) were collected in all the six sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative FISH Analysis in Five Species of Eyprepocnemidine
    Heredity (2003) 90, 377–381 & 2003 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 0018-067X/03 $25.00 www.nature.com/hdy Comparative FISH analysis in five species of Eyprepocnemidine grasshoppers J Cabrero1, A Bugrov2,3, E Warchałowska-S´liwa4,MDLo´pez-Leo´n1, F Perfectti1 and JPM Camacho1 1Departamento de Gene´tica, Universidad de Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain; 2Institute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, 630091 Novosibirsk, Russia; 3Novosibirsk State University, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia; 4Department of Experimental Zoology, Institute of Systematics and Evolution of Animals, Polish Academy of Sciences, 31-016 Krako´w, Poland The chromosomal localization of ribosomal DNA, and a species, however, lacked the 180 bp tandem repeat, and 180 bp satellite DNA isolated from Spanish Eyprepocnemis showed rDNA clusters in one (S9 in Thisoicetrinus pteros- plorans specimens, has been analysed in five Eyprepocne- tichus), two (S9 and S10 in Eyprepocnemis unicolor;M8 and midinae species collected in Russia and Central Asia. S11 in Heteracris adspersa), or three (S9,S10, and S11 in Caucasian E. plorans individuals carried each of the two Shirakiacris shirakii) chromosome pairs. The implications of DNAs, but the rDNA was limited to only two chromosomes these findings for the evolution of these two chromosome (S9 and S11) in sharp contrast to Spanish specimens that markers in this group of species are discussed. show 4–8 rDNA clusters and to Moroccan specimens which Heredity (2003) 90, 377–381. doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6800255 carry rDNA in almost all chromosomes. The four remaining Keywords: rDNA; satDNA; heterochromatin; grasshopper; nucleolus organizer region Introduction change (Maggini et al, 1991), and the amplification of minor rDNA loci (Dubcovsky and Dvo¨rak, 1995).
    [Show full text]
  • Karyotype and Chromosomal Characteristics of Rdna of Cobitis
    COMPARATIVE A peer-reviewed open-access journal CompCytogen 12(4):Karyotype 483–491 and (2018) chromosomal characteristics of rDNA of Cobitis strumicae... 483 doi: 10.3897/CompCytogen.v12i4.28068 RESEARCH ARTICLE Cytogenetics http://compcytogen.pensoft.net International Journal of Plant & Animal Cytogenetics, Karyosystematics, and Molecular Systematics Karyotype and chromosomal characteristics of rDNA of Cobitis strumicae Karaman, 1955 (Teleostei, Cobitidae) from Lake Volvi, Greece Eva Hnátková1,4, Costas Triantaphyllidis2, Catherine Ozouf-Costaz3, Lukáš Choleva4, Zuzana Majtánová4, Joerg Bohlen4, Petr Ráb4 1 Department of Zoology and Fisheries, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences, 165 00 Prague, Kamýcká 129, Czech Republic 2 Department of Genetics, Development and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Sciences, School of Biology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, University Cam- pus, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece 3 Institut de Biologie Paris Seine, UMR 7138 “Evolution”, Sorbonne Univer- sités, Case 5, 7 quai St Bernard, 75952 Paris cedex 05, Paris, France 4 Laboratory of Fish Genetics, Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics, Academy of Sciences of Czech Republic, 277 21 Liběchov, Czech Republic Corresponding author: Eva Hnátková ([email protected]) Academic editor: Ekaterina Gornung | Received 29 June 2018 | Accepted 26 September 2018 | Published 16 November 2018 http://zoobank.org/314988CD-B02E-4B38-B88E-CE4E3C56A9EB Citation: Hnátková E, Triantaphyllidis C, Ozouf-Costaz C, Choleva L,
    [Show full text]
  • Grasshoppers and Locusts (Orthoptera: Caelifera) from the Palestinian Territories at the Palestine Museum of Natural History
    Zoology and Ecology ISSN: 2165-8005 (Print) 2165-8013 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tzec20 Grasshoppers and locusts (Orthoptera: Caelifera) from the Palestinian territories at the Palestine Museum of Natural History Mohammad Abusarhan, Zuhair S. Amr, Manal Ghattas, Elias N. Handal & Mazin B. Qumsiyeh To cite this article: Mohammad Abusarhan, Zuhair S. Amr, Manal Ghattas, Elias N. Handal & Mazin B. Qumsiyeh (2017): Grasshoppers and locusts (Orthoptera: Caelifera) from the Palestinian territories at the Palestine Museum of Natural History, Zoology and Ecology, DOI: 10.1080/21658005.2017.1313807 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21658005.2017.1313807 Published online: 26 Apr 2017. Submit your article to this journal View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=tzec20 Download by: [Bethlehem University] Date: 26 April 2017, At: 04:32 ZOOLOGY AND ECOLOGY, 2017 https://doi.org/10.1080/21658005.2017.1313807 Grasshoppers and locusts (Orthoptera: Caelifera) from the Palestinian territories at the Palestine Museum of Natural History Mohammad Abusarhana, Zuhair S. Amrb, Manal Ghattasa, Elias N. Handala and Mazin B. Qumsiyeha aPalestine Museum of Natural History, Bethlehem University, Bethlehem, Palestine; bDepartment of Biology, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY We report on the collection of grasshoppers and locusts from the Occupied Palestinian Received 25 November 2016 Territories (OPT) studied at the nascent Palestine Museum of Natural History. Three hundred Accepted 28 March 2017 and forty specimens were collected during the 2013–2016 period.
    [Show full text]
  • The B Chromosome Polymorphism of the Grasshopper Eyprepocnemis Plorans in North Africa. I. B Variants and Frequency
    Heredity 83 (1999) 428±434 Received 5 November 1998, accepted 21 June 1999 The B chromosome polymorphism of the grasshopper Eyprepocnemis plorans in North Africa. I. B variants and frequency M. BAKKALI, J. CABRERO, M. D. LO PEZ-LEO N, F. PERFECTTI & J. P. M. CAMACHO* Departamento de GeneÂtica, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Granada, E-18071 Granada, Spain Polymorphism for B chromosomes has been detected in all nine populations of the grasshopper Eyprepocnemis plorans ssp. plorans sampled in Morocco. The most frequent B chromosome in all populations showed a C-banding pattern and size similar to those of the B1 variant found in the Iberian Peninsula. In addition, other B chromosome variants (B1iso1,B1iso2,B1d1,B1di1,B3and B1dd1) were discovered in these populations, although at a very low frequency. No signi®cant dierences in B chromosome frequency were found either in the nine populations or, for some of them, in up to three consecutive years. These results are discussed in the light of current hypotheses on the evolution of this B chromosome polymorphism in the Iberian Peninsula. Keywords: B chromosomes, Eyprepocnemis plorans ssp. plorans, grasshopper, Orthoptera. Introduction chromosome variants have been described in natural Spanish populations of this grasshopper species, B chromosomes, also called accessory or supernumerary according to size, morphology and C-banding pattern chromosomes, are large pieces of dispensable indepen- (Henriques-Gil et al., 1984; Henriques-Gil & Arana, dently segregating DNA (Camacho et al., 1997a,b). 1990; Lo pez-Leo n et al., 1993); however, only ®ve Reported in more than 1300 plant species and nearly 500 variants have had success in establishing polymorphisms animal species (Jones & Puertas, 1993), variation in the (B1,B2,B5,B6and B24), the remaining types being found number and morphology of B chromosomes is a at extremely low frequency (Henriques-Gil & Arana, frequent chromosomal polymorphism found in natural 1990; Lo pez-Leo n et al., 1993).
    [Show full text]
  • Eyprepocnemis Plorans (Acrididae: Orthoptera)
    Genotype-dependent effect of B-chromosomes on chiasma frequency in Eyprepocnemis plorans (Acrididae: Orthoptera) N. Henriques-Gil, J. L. Santos & R. Giraldez Departarnento de Genbtica, Facuhad de Biologia, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain Abstract I n order to analyze the effect of B-chromosomes on chiasma frequency, the offspring of different females of the grasshopper Eyprepocnemis plorans have been studied. From the comparison between individuals of the different families having a given number of B's and between individuals with different numbers of B-chromo- somes within the same family, it can be concluded that the effect of the genetic background on chiasma frequency is greater than that produced by the presence of B's, and that there is a between-families variation in the effect of B-chromosomes which, in addition, is negatively correlated with the chiasma frequency of related individuals without B's. This genotype-dependent effect of B-chromosomes is discussed. Introduction Material and methods The possible effect of B-chromosomes on chias- Thirty fertilized Eyprepocnemis plorans females ma frequency has been the subject of a number of were collected in a natural population near Daimuz studies. Contradictory results have been obtained (Valencia, Spain) and maintained in the laboratory by different authors even within the same species in order to obtain pods. After 45 days at room (see Jones, 1975). It is well known that there are temperature, pods were kept for at least 45 more many other factors such as genotype, age and en- days at 4 °C and then incubated at 33-35 °C until vironmental conditions that have an effect on chi- eclosion of the eggs.
    [Show full text]
  • Four New Species and One New Subspecies of the Genus Cobitis (Pisces: Ostariophysi: Cobitidae) from Turkey
    Tr. J. of Zoology 22 (1998) 9-15 © TÜBİTAK Four new species and one new subspecies of the genus Cobitis (Pisces: Ostariophysi: Cobitidae) from Turkey Füsun ERKAKAN, F. Güler ATALAY - EKMEKÇİ Biology Dept, Faculty of Science, Hacettepe University, Beytepe Campus, 06532 Ankara-TURKEY Teodor T. NALBANT Institute of Biology, Department of Taxonomy and Evolution 31, Furmoasa Str., R-78114, Bucharest-ROMANIA Received: 04.03.1998 Abstract: On the basis of morphological characters such as the shape of the mouth, suborbital spines, lamina circularis subdorsal scales, pigmentation and fin ray formulas four new species (kellei, fahireae, splendens and puncticulata) and one subspecies (C. vardarensis kurui) of genus Cobitis from Turkey are described. Key Words: Cobitidae, Cobitis, new species, Turkey. Türkiye’den Cobitis Genusuna ait dört yeni tür ve bir yeni alttür (Pisces: Ostariophysi: Cobitidae) Özet: Ağız yapısı, suborbital dikenler, lamina circularis, subdorsal pullar, pigmentasyon ve yüzgeç ışınlarının formülü gibi morfolojik karakterlere dayanılarak Tükiye’den Cobitis cinsine ait dört yeni tür (kellei, fahireae, splendens ve puncticulata) ve bir yeni alttür (C. vardarensis kurui) tanımlanmıştır. Anahtar Sözcükler: Cobitidae, Cobitis, yeni tür, Türkiye Introduction (4), Bianco (5) and Economidis and Nalbant (3), for the The evolution of the genus Cobitis on the whole from genus Cobitis. Furthermore, Hanko (6), Battalgil (7), the Miocene to the present has raised many interesting Battalgazi (8), Tortenese (9), Banarescu and Nalbant (10) problems in connection with the evolutions of its different Kuru (11), Erk’akan and Kuru (12), Coad and lineages. These aspects cannot be analyzed without the Sarieyyüpoglu (13) and Krupp and Moubayed (14) have tranformation of different territories and climatic made valuable contributions to the taxonomy of Cobitis conditions as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Orthoptera: Acrididae)
    Fragmenta entomologica, 50 (1): 65-67 (2018) eISSN: 2284-4880 (online version) pISSN: 0429-288X (print version) Short scientific note Submitted: January 8th, 2018 - Accepted: June 4th, 2018 - Published: June 29th, 2018 First records of Eyprepocnemis plorans plorans in southeastern Italy (Orthoptera: Acrididae) Rocco LABADESSA 1,*, Teodoro DURA 2, Giuseppe MASCIA 3, Arianna PISCONTI 4, Erminio ROLLI 5, Wolfgang WAGNER 6 1 Association “Centro Studi de Romita” - Via G. Postiglione 9, 70126 Bari, Italy - [email protected] 2 Via D. Peluso 21/D, 74121 Taranto, Italy - [email protected] 3 Via N. Machiavelli 15, 74020 San Marzano di San Giuseppe (TA), Italy - [email protected] 4 Via V. Emanuele 93, 74020 Maruggio (TA), Italy - [email protected] 5 Via Lecce 5, 73044 Galatone (LE), Italy - [email protected] 6 Baseler Straße 6, 70619 Stuttgart, Germany - [email protected] * Corresponding author Abstract New populations of Eyprepocnemis plorans plorans (Charpentier, 1825) are first reported for southeastern Italy. The species was found in the period 2013-2017 in different lowland habitats of Apulia and Basilicata. These data may document a most recent colonization of southeastern Italy, which is potentially due to a wide range shift or expansion of species distribution from adjacent regions or countries. Key words: Eyprepocnemis plorans, grasshopper, Acridoidea, Apulia, Basilicata. Eyprepocnemis plorans (Charpentier, 1825) is a medium- Failla et al. 1973; Ramme 1927; Riggio 1891), its occur- sized grasshopper belonging to the paleotropical subfam- rence in southern peninsular regions has been first noticed ily Eyprepocnemidinae (family Acrididae), of which it since 2006 (Iorio 2010; Massa et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Orthoptera: Acrididae)
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/119560; this version posted March 22, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 1 2 Ecological drivers of body size evolution and sexual size dimorphism 3 in short-horned grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae) 4 5 Vicente García-Navas1*, Víctor Noguerales2, Pedro J. Cordero2 and Joaquín Ortego1 6 7 8 *Corresponding author: [email protected]; [email protected] 9 Department of Integrative Ecology, Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD-CSIC), Avda. Américo 10 Vespucio s/n, Seville E-41092, Spain 11 12 13 Running head: SSD and body size evolution in Orthopera 14 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/119560; this version posted March 22, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 15 Sexual size dimorphism (SSD) is widespread and variable in nature. Although female-biased 16 SSD predominates among insects, the proximate ecological and evolutionary factors promoting 17 this phenomenon remain largely unstudied. Here, we employ modern phylogenetic comparative 18 methods on 8 subfamilies of Iberian grasshoppers (85 species) to examine the validity of 19 different models of evolution of body size and SSD and explore how they are shaped by a suite 20 of ecological variables (habitat specialization, substrate use, altitude) and/or constrained by 21 different evolutionary pressures (female fecundity, strength of sexual selection, length of the 22 breeding season).
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomic Status of the Genus Cobitis Linnaeus, 1758 (Teleostei: Cobitidae) in the Southern Caspian Sea Basin, Iran with Description of a New Species
    FishTaxa (2017) 2(1): 48-61 E-ISSN: 2458-942X Journal homepage: www.fishtaxa.com © 2016 FISHTAXA. All rights reserved Taxonomic status of the genus Cobitis Linnaeus, 1758 (Teleostei: Cobitidae) in the southern Caspian Sea basin, Iran with description of a new species Soheil EAGDERI1*, Arash JOULADEH-ROUDBAR1, Pariya JALILI1, Golnaz SAYYADZADEH2, Hamid Reza ESMAEILI2 1Department of Fisheries, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran. 2Ichthyology and Molecular Systematics Research Laboratory, Department of Biology, College of Sciences, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran. Corresponding author: *E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Members of the genus Cobitis in the southern Caspian Sea basin of Iran are found from the Atrak to Aras Rivers. Two species, namely C. keyvani and C. faridpaki had been already described from this distribution range. However, previous study revealed that C. keyvani is a junior synonym of C. faridpaki, therefore populations of the eastern part of the Sefid River are C. faridpaki and those of the western part of this basin represent an undescribed species misidentified as C. keyvani in previous studies. Here we describe and compare it with other species of this genus from Iran based on morphological and molecular (COI barcode region) characters. Keywords: Freshwater fish, Morphology, COI, Spined loach, Sefid River. Zoobank: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:8E2059BD-3345-4FB1-A7D1-12FD62CE01AD urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:B5BA46A4-6ABE-4392-A558-DA54A08D270A Introduction Members of the genus Cobitis represent one of the most widely distributed Palearctic primary freshwater fishes (Sawada 1982; Coad 2017). They are found in Eurasia and Morocco (North Africa) and Southern Asia (Eschmeyer and Fong 2011).
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwater Fishes and Lampreys of Greece
    HELLENIC CENTRE FOR MARINE RESEARCH Monographs on Marine Sciences No. 8 Freshwater Fishes and Lampreys of Greece An Annotated Checklist Barbieri R., Zogaris S., Kalogianni E., Stoumboudi M. Th, Chatzinikolaou Y., Giakoumi S., Kapakos Y., Kommatas D., Koutsikos N., Tachos, V., Vardakas L. & Economou A.N. 2015 Freshwater Fishes and Lampreys of Greece An Annotated Checklist HELLENIC CENTRE FOR MARINE RESEARCH Monographs on Marine Sciences No. 8 Freshwater Fishes and Lampreys of Greece An Annotated Checklist Barbieri R., Zogaris S., Kalogianni E., Stoumboudi M. Th, Chatzinikolaou Y., Giakoumi S., Kapakos Y., Kommatas D., Koutsikos N., Tachos, V., Vardakas L. & Economou A.N. 2015 Monographs on Marine Sciences 8 Authors: Barbieri R., Zogaris S., Kalogianni E., Stoumboudi M.Th., Chatzinikolaou Y., Giakoumi S., Kapakos Y., Kommatas D., Koutsikos N., Tachos V., Vardakas L. & Economou A.N. Fish drawings: R. Barbieri English text editing: S. Zogaris, E. Kalogianni, E. Green Design and production: Aris Vidalis Scientific reviewers: Jörg Freyhof, Dimitra Bobori Acknowledgements We would like to thank the following people for significant assistance in the field, for providing unpublished information, and/or support during the preparation of this work: Apostolos Apostolou, Nicolas Bailly, Bill Beaumont, Dimitra Bobori, Giorgos Catsadorakis, Charalambos Daoulas, Elias Dimitriou, Panayiotis Dimopoulos, Uwe Dussling, Panos S. Economidis, Jörg Freyhof, Zbigniew Kaczkowski, Nektarios Kalaitzakis, Stephanos Kavadas, Maurice Kottelat, Emmanuil Koutrakis, David Koutsogianopoulos, Marcello Kovačić, Ioannis Leonardos, Danilo Mrdak, Theodoros Naziridis, Elena Oikonomou, Kostas G. Papakonstatinou, Ioannis Paschos, Kostas Perdikaris, Olga Petriki, Radek Šanda, Nikolaos Skoulikidis, Manos Sperelakis, Kostas Tsigenopoulos, Maarten Vanhove, Haris Vavalidis, Jasna Vukić , Brian Zimmerman and the HCMR library staff (Anavissos Attiki).
    [Show full text]
  • Grasshoppers of Azonal Riparian Corridors and Their Response to Land Transformation in the Cape Floristic Region
    Grasshoppers of azonal riparian corridors and their response to land transformation in the Cape Floristic Region by Bianca Mignon Pronk Thesis presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science (Conservation Ecology) in the Faculty of AgriSciences at Stellenbosch University Supervisor: Prof. Michael J. Samways Co-supervisors: Dr. James S. Pryke and Dr. Corinna S. Bazelet Department of Conservation Ecology and Entomology Faculty of AgriSciences Stellenbosch University March 2016 I Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Declaration By submitting this thesis electronically, I declare that the entirety of the work contained therein is my own, original work, that I am the sole author thereof (save to the extent explicitly otherwise stated), that reproduction and publication thereof by Stellenbosch University will not infringe any third party rights, and that I have not previously in its entirety, or in part, submitted it for obtaining any qualification. March 2016 Copyright © 2016 Stellenbosch University All rights reserved. II Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Aan my Ouers, Broer en Smokey III Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za All rights reserved Overall summary The Cape Floristic Region (CFR) is a global biodiversity hotspot with high levels of endemism across many taxa, including Orthoptera. Azonal vegetation, a much forgotten component of the CFR, is a unique vegetation type that forms part of the riparian corridor. This is a complex, unique and diverse ecosystem with high levels of local biodiversity that connects the aquatic and terrestrial realms. The riparian corridor is highly disturbed through anthropogenic activities and invasion by alien vegetation causing deterioration of riparian corridors.
    [Show full text]