A/K/A SARAH ANN MASSE

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A/K/A SARAH ANN MASSE Case 1:17-cv-09554-AKH Document 140 Filed 10/31/18 Page 1 of 264 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK LOUISETTE GEISS, SARAH ANN THOMAS No. 1:17-cv-09554-AKH (a/k/a SARAH ANN MASSE), MELISSA THOMPSON, MELISSA SAGEMILLER, NANNETTE MAY (f/k/a NANNETTE KLATT), KATHERINE KENDALL, ZOE JURY TRIAL DEMANDED BROCK, CAITLIN DULANY, LARISSA GOMES, and JANE DOE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. THE WEINSTEIN COMPANY HOLDINGS, LLC, MIRAMAX FILM NY LLC, THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY, DISNEY ENTERPRISES, INC., BUENA VISTA INTERNATIONAL, INC., HARVEY WEINSTEIN, ROBERT WEINSTEIN, DIRK ZIFF, TIM SARNOFF, MARC LASRY, TARAK BEN AMMAR, LANCE MAEROV, RICHARD KOENIGSBERG, PAUL TUDOR JONES, JEFF SACKMAN, JAMES DOLAN, MICHAEL EISNER, IRWIN REITER, DAVID GLASSER, FRANK GIL, RICK SCHWARTZ, FABRIZIO LOMBARDO, MARK GILL, NANCY ASHBROOKE, BARBARA SCHNEEWEISS, MIRAMAX DOES 1-10, TALENT AGENCY DOES 1-100, and JOHN DOES 1-50, inclusive, Deadline Defendants. FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT 010717-11 1076419 V1 Case 1:17-cv-09554-AKH Document 140 Filed 10/31/18 Page 2 of 264 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................1 II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE ..........................................................................................8 III. THE PARTIES.....................................................................................................................9 A. Plaintiffs ...................................................................................................................9 1. Louisette Geiss. ............................................................................................9 2. Katherine Kendall. .......................................................................................9 3. Zoe Brock...................................................................................................10 4. Sarah Ann Thomas. ....................................................................................10 5. Melissa Sagemiller. ....................................................................................11 6. Nannette Klatt. ...........................................................................................11 7. Caitlin Dulany. ...........................................................................................11 8. Larissa Gomes. ...........................................................................................12 9. Melissa Thompson. ....................................................................................12 10. Jane Doe. ....................................................................................................13 B. Defendants .............................................................................................................13 IV. FACTS ...............................................................................................................................22 A. Weinstein’s power in the entertainment industry—from his time at both Miramax and TWC—wasDeadline extensive......................................................................................22 B. Hollywood business, which includes the business of performing, is regularly conducted on the road and at hotels. ......................................................................23 C. Weinstein’s predatory behavior followed a pattern designed for his personal gratification at the expense of Plaintiffs and the Class. .........................................28 D. Like many of the Class members, Plaintiffs Katherine Kendall, Zoe Brock, Melissa Sagemiller, Nannette Klatt, Caitlin Dulany, and Larissa Gomes, were assaulted when Weinstein worked for Miramax and Disney. ................................39 1. Plaintiff Nannette Klatt’s experience (1993 or 1994). ...............................39 010717-11 1076419 V1 Case 1:17-cv-09554-AKH Document 140 Filed 10/31/18 Page 3 of 264 2. Plaintiff Katherine Kendall’s experience (1993). ......................................41 3. Plaintiff Caitlin Dulany’s experience (1996). ............................................46 4. Plaintiff Zoe Brock’s experience (1998). ...................................................52 5. Plaintiff Melissa Sagemiller’s experience (2000). .....................................55 6. Plaintiff Larissa Gomes’ experience (2000). .............................................58 E. Like many Class members, Plaintiff Jane Doe’s experience with Weinstein occurred over a period of years (2002-2011) when Weinstein worked for Disney and Miramax, and then TWC. ................................................................................62 F. Like many Class members, Plaintiffs Lousiette Geiss, Sarah Ann Thomas, and Melissa Thompson’s experiences followed the same script when Weinstein worked for TWC. ...................................................................................................70 1. Plaintiff Louisette Geiss’s experience (2008). ...........................................70 2. Plaintiff Sarah Ann Thomas’s (a/k/a Sarah Ann Masse) experience (2008). ........................................................................................................72 3. Plaintiff Melissa Thompson’s experience (2011). .....................................74 G. Employees and Executives of Miramax and Disney facilitated, had knowledge of or should have known of Weinstein’s predatory behavior. ...................................86 1. Employees and executives of Miramax and Disney often aided and abetted Weinstein in the commission of his sexual misconduct. ...........................86 2. Disney Officer Michael Eisner (1993-2005) knew or should have known of Weinstein’s pattern of sexual misconduct. ............................................94 3. Miramax Officer Robert Weinstein (1979-2005) knew or should have knownDeadline of Harvey Weinstein’s predatory sexual misconduct. ...................97 4. Miramax Officer Irwin Reiter (1989-2005) knew or should have known of Harvey Weinstein’s predatory sexual misconduct. ..................................102 5. Miramax Officer Mark Gill (1997-2002) knew or should have known of Harvey Weinstein’s predatory sexual misconduct. ..................................103 6. Miramax Officer Barbara Schneeweiss (1996-2005) knew or should have known of Harvey Weinstein’s predatory sexual misconduct. .................105 7. Miramax Officer Rick Schwartz (1999-2006) knew or should have known of Harvey Weinstein’s predatory sexual misconduct. .............................107 - iii - 010717-11 1076419 V1 Case 1:17-cv-09554-AKH Document 140 Filed 10/31/18 Page 4 of 264 8. Miramax Officer Fabrizio Lombardo (1999-2004) knew or should have known of Harvey Weinstein’s predatory sexual misconduct. .................108 9. Miramax Officer Nancy Ashbrooke (1991-2000) knew or should have known of Harvey Weinstein’s predatory sexual misconduct. .................110 H. Officers, Directors, and Employees of TWC facilitated, had knowledge of or should have known of Weinstein’s predatory behavior. ......................................112 1. Harvey Weinstein’s employment contracts, approved by the Board, served to insulate him from recourse for sexual misconduct. .............................112 2. Employees of TWC often aided and abetted Weinstein in the commission of his sexual misconduct. .........................................................................115 3. Director Robert Weinstein (October 21, 2005-July 13, 2018) knew or should have known that Harvey Weinstein was a serial sexual predator. ...................................................................................................118 4. Director Lance Maerov (October 21, 2005-July 13, 2018) knew or should have known that Harvey Weinstein was a serial sexual predator. ...........126 5. Director Tarak Ben Ammar (October 21, 2005-July 13, 2018) knew or should have known that Harvey Weinstein was a serial sexual predator. ...................................................................................................132 6. Director Richard Koenigsberg (October 21, 2005-October 14, 2017) knew or should have known that Harvey Weinstein was a serial sexual predator. ...................................................................................................137 7. Director Dirk Ziff (October 21, 2005-April 30, 2009; in or about 2011 - October 6, 2017) knew or should have known that Harvey Weinstein was a serial sexual predator. ............................................................................143 8. Director Jeff Sackman (September 21, 2010-October 6, 2015) knew or shouldDeadline have known that Harvey Weinstein was a serial sexual predator. ...................................................................................................148 9. Director Tim Sarnoff (June 25, 2013-October 6, 2017) knew or should have known that Harvey Weinstein was a serial sexual predator. ...........153 10. Director James Dolan (September 30, 2015 - June 20, 2016) knew or should have known that Harvey Weinstein was a serial sexual predator. ...................................................................................................158 11. Director Paul Tudor Jones (October 20, 2015-October 7, 2017) knew or should have known that Harvey Weinstein was a serial sexual predator. ...................................................................................................164 - iv -
Recommended publications
  • FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION Washington, DC 20463 June 1, 2021 CERTIFIED MAIL – RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Via Email: Pryan@Commo
    FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION Washington, DC 20463 June 1, 2021 CERTIFIED MAIL – RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Via Email: [email protected] Paul S. Ryan Common Cause 805 15th Street, NW, Suite 800 Washington, DC 20005 RE: MUR 7324 Dear Mr. Ryan: The Federal Election Commission (“Commission”) has considered the allegations contained in your complaint dated February 20, 2018. The Commission found reason to believe that respondents David J. Pecker and American Media, Inc. knowingly and willfully violated 52 U.S.C. § 30118(a). The Factual and Legal Analysis, which formed a basis for the Commission’s finding, is enclosed for your information. On May 17, 2021, a conciliation agreement signed by A360 Media, LLC, as successor in interest to American Media, Inc. was accepted by the Commission and the Commission closed the file as to Pecker and American Media, Inc. A copy of the conciliation agreement is enclosed for your information. There were an insufficient number of votes to find reason to believe that the remaining respondents violated the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended (the “Act”). Accordingly, on May 20, 2021, the Commission closed the file in MUR 7324. A Statement of Reasons providing a basis for the Commission’s decision will follow. Documents related to the case will be placed on the public record within 30 days. See Disclosure of Certain Documents in Enforcement and Other Matters, 81 Fed. Reg. 50,702 (Aug. 2, 2016), effective September 1, 2016. MUR 7324 Letter to Paul S. Ryan Page 2 The Act allows a complainant to seek judicial review of the Commission’s dismissal of this action.
    [Show full text]
  • Pr-Dvd-Holdings-As-Of-September-18
    CALL # LOCATION TITLE AUTHOR BINGE BOX COMEDIES prmnd Comedies binge box (includes Airplane! --Ferris Bueller's Day Off --The First Wives Club --Happy Gilmore)[videorecording] / Princeton Public Library. BINGE BOX CONCERTS AND MUSICIANSprmnd Concerts and musicians binge box (Includes Brad Paisley: Life Amplified Live Tour, Live from WV --Close to You: Remembering the Carpenters --John Sebastian Presents Folk Rewind: My Music --Roy Orbison and Friends: Black and White Night)[videorecording] / Princeton Public Library. BINGE BOX MUSICALS prmnd Musicals binge box (includes Mamma Mia! --Moulin Rouge --Rodgers and Hammerstein's Cinderella [DVD] --West Side Story) [videorecording] / Princeton Public Library. BINGE BOX ROMANTIC COMEDIESprmnd Romantic comedies binge box (includes Hitch --P.S. I Love You --The Wedding Date --While You Were Sleeping)[videorecording] / Princeton Public Library. DVD 001.942 ALI DISC 1-3 prmdv Aliens, abductions & extraordinary sightings [videorecording]. DVD 001.942 BES prmdv Best of ancient aliens [videorecording] / A&E Television Networks History executive producer, Kevin Burns. DVD 004.09 CRE prmdv The creation of the computer [videorecording] / executive producer, Bob Jaffe written and produced by Donald Sellers created by Bruce Nash History channel executive producers, Charlie Maday, Gerald W. Abrams Jaffe Productions Hearst Entertainment Television in association with the History Channel. DVD 133.3 UNE DISC 1-2 prmdv The unexplained [videorecording] / produced by Towers Productions, Inc. for A&E Network executive producer, Michael Cascio. DVD 158.2 WEL prmdv We'll meet again [videorecording] / producers, Simon Harries [and three others] director, Ashok Prasad [and five others]. DVD 158.2 WEL prmdv We'll meet again. Season 2 [videorecording] / director, Luc Tremoulet producer, Page Shepherd.
    [Show full text]
  • GANGS of NEW YORK Außer Konkurrenz GANGS of NEW YORK GANGS of NEW YORK Regie:Martin Scorsese
    Wettbewerb/IFB 2003 GANGS OF NEW YORK Außer Konkurrenz GANGS OF NEW YORK GANGS OF NEW YORK Regie:Martin Scorsese USA 2002 Darsteller Amsterdam Vallon Leonardo DiCaprio Länge 168 Min. Bill Cutting Daniel Day-Lewis Format 35 mm, Jenny Everdeane Cameron Diaz Cinemascope Boss Tweed Jim Boadbent Farbe Happy Jack John C.Reilly Johnny Sirocco Henry Thomas Stabliste Pfarrer Vallon Liam Neeson Buch Jay Cocks Walter „Monk“ Steven Zaillian McGinn Brendan Gleeson Kenneth Lonergan McGloin Gary Lewis Story Jay Cocks Shang Stephen Graham Kamera Michael Ballhaus Killoran Eddie Marsan Kameraführung Andrew Rowlands Reverend Raleigh Alec McCowen Kameraassistenz Tom Lappin Mr.Schermerhorn David Hemmings Schnitt Thelma Soonmaker Jimmy Spoils Larry Gilliard,Jr. Mitarbeit James Kwei Hell-Cat Maggie Cara Seymour Pat Buba P.T.Barnum Roger Ashton- Ton Ivan Sharrock Griffiths Musik Howard Shore Einarmiger Priester Peter Hugo Daly Production Design Dante Ferreti Daniel Day-Lewis, Leonardo DiCaprio Junger Amsterdam Cian McCormack Ausstattung Stefano Ortolani Junger Johnny Andrew Gallagher Kostüm Sandy Powell O’Connell Philip Kirk Regieassistenz Joseph Reidy GANGS OF NEW YORK Bills Gang Liam Carney Casting Ellen Lewis Das südliche Manhattan in den 60er Jahren des 19. Jahrhunderts, einer Zeit Gary McCormack Produktionsltg. Michael Hausman großer Unruhen in den USA – das Land steht kurz vor dem Bürgerkrieg. Für David McBlain Produzenten Alberto Grimaldi die arme Bevölkerung von New York tobt der Kampf allerdings schon lange Jennys Mädchen Katherine Wallach Harvey Weinstein – und zwar direkt vor ihrer Haustür. Korruption bestimmt die Politik, Gesetz- Carmen Hanlon Executive Producers Michael Ovitz Ilaria D’Elia Bob Weinstein losigkeit das Alltagsleben; rivalisierende Gangs kämpfen um die Vorherr- Gangmitglieder Nevan Finnegan Rick Yorn schaft auf den Straßen.
    [Show full text]
  • Co-Optation of the American Dream: a History of the Failed Independent Experiment
    Cinesthesia Volume 10 Issue 1 Dynamics of Power: Corruption, Co- Article 3 optation, and the Collective December 2019 Co-optation of the American Dream: A History of the Failed Independent Experiment Kyle Macciomei Grand Valley State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/cine Recommended Citation Macciomei, Kyle (2019) "Co-optation of the American Dream: A History of the Failed Independent Experiment," Cinesthesia: Vol. 10 : Iss. 1 , Article 3. Available at: https://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/cine/vol10/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@GVSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cinesthesia by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@GVSU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Macciomei: Co-optation of the American Dream Independent cinema has been an aspect of the American film industry since the inception of the art form itself. The aspects and perceptions of independent film have altered drastically over the years, but in general it can be used to describe American films produced and distributed outside of the Hollywood major studio system. But as American film history has revealed time and time again, independent studios always struggle to maintain their freedom from the Hollywood industrial complex. American independent cinema has been heavily integrated with major Hollywood studios who have attempted to tap into the niche markets present in filmgoers searching for theatrical experiences outside of the mainstream. From this, we can say that the American independent film industry has a long history of co-optation, acquisition, and the stifling of competition from the major film studios present in Hollywood, all of whom pose a threat to the autonomy that is sought after in these markets by filmmakers and film audiences.
    [Show full text]
  • Female Investors Make a Bid for the Weinstein Company
    Case Study Female Investors Make a Bid for The Weinstein Company Thought Leadership and Advocacy PR The Challenge: After disgraced movie producer Harvey Weinstein was ousted from his company, Maria Contreras- Sweet, a former cabinet official and head of the Small Business Administration under President Barack Obama, assembled a majority-female team of Hollywood heavyweights to make a bid for The Weinstein Company and rebrand it as a place that was welcoming to, and supportive of, women. TASC was brought on to generate excitement around the deal and cultivate support for it. Our Strategy: TASC capitalized on the momentum of the Time’s Up and #MeToo movements, and made Contreras- Sweet and her team a symbol of hope and progress in the film industry’s treatment of women. TASC managed a huge volume of media requests for Contreras-Sweet and strategically released information on the deal to garner community interest and support from key decision makers. Several other groups were also in the running to secure a deal, and many details of negotiations could not be made public. TASC worked to ensure that outlets were accurately reporting on the details of Contreras-Sweet’s deal, the only one to save jobs, create a female-majority board of directors and create a $90 million compensation fund for Weinstein’s victims. Results: Our work generated hundreds of media placements in national outlets including Variety, The Hollywood Reporter, The New York Times, ABC News, CNBC, Yahoo! Finance, CNN Money, The Los Angeles Times, The Wall Street Journal, Refinery29 and dozens more, which turned the tide in Contreras-Sweet’s favor with The Weinstein Company’s board of directors.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 Movie Catalog © Warner Bros
    1-800-876-5577 www.swank.com Swank Motion Pictures,Inc. Swank Motion 2013 Movie Catalog 2013 Movie © Warner Bros. © 2013 Disney © TriStar Pictures © Warner Bros. © NBC Universal © Columbia Pictures Industries, ©Inc. Summit Entertainment 2013 Movie Catalog Movie 2013 Inc. Pictures, Motion Swank 1-800-876-5577 www.swank.com MOVIES Swank Motion Pictures,Inc. Swank Motion 2013 Movie Catalog 2013 Movie © New Line Cinema © 2013 Disney © Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc. © Warner Bros. © 2013 Disney/Pixar © Summit Entertainment Promote Your movie event! Ask about FREE promotional materials to help make your next movie event a success! 2013 Movie Catalog 2013 Movie Catalog TABLE OF CONTENTS New Releases ......................................................... 1-34 Swank has rights to the largest collection of movies from the top Coming Soon .............................................................35 Hollywood & independent studios. Whether it’s blockbuster movies, All Time Favorites .............................................36-39 action and suspense, comedies or classic films,Swank has them all! Event Calendar .........................................................40 Sat., June 16th - 8:00pm Classics ...................................................................41-42 Disney 2012 © Date Night ........................................................... 43-44 TABLE TENT Sat., June 16th - 8:00pm TM & © Marvel & Subs 1-800-876-5577 | www.swank.com Environmental Films .............................................. 45 FLYER Faith-Based
    [Show full text]
  • Project Runway Contestant to Design Exclusive Dress for Macy's
    October 6, 2009 Project Runway Contestant to Design Exclusive Dress for Macy's INC Dress to Be Available in Select Macy's Stores in December NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- As cameras rolled on Lifetime's Project Runway last week, up-and-coming designer Irina Shabayeva won the challenge of a lifetime. The 27- year-old New Yorker has been granted the opportunity to design a holiday dress for Macy's INC International Concepts brand. "We are happy to partner with Macy's to present our designers with a challenge that gives them a taste of the real world aspects of the fashion industry. This week's challenge allowed Irina the opportunity to have one of her designs sold by a major retailer and Project Runway fans will now have the chance to purchase the exclusive party dress this holiday season," said Lance Still, Executive Vice President of Promotions and Integrated Marketing for The Weinstein Company. Part of Macy's participation in Project Runway Season 6 was to create a challenge that would be judged by Martine Reardon, Executive Vice President Macy's Inc. "It is tremendous to see what these young and talented designers can do in a very short time and with such imagination. Irina's fresh take on fashion is the ideal fit for our INC brand," said Reardon. "Our customer will love her ultra-feminine aesthetic." Given all the resources of a top designer, Irina's holiday dress is a contemporary take on the little black dress. Made of rayon matte jersey, the butterfly-embellished dress will be available in sizes small through x-large, retailing for $139.00.
    [Show full text]
  • Unpopular Culture and Explore Its Critical Possibilities and Ramifications from a Large Variety of Perspectives
    15 mm front 153 mm 8 mm 19,9 mm 8 mm front 153 mm 15 mm 15 mm TELEVISUAL CULTURE TELEVISUAL CULTURE This collection includes eighteen essays that introduce the concept of Lüthe and Pöhlmann (eds) unpopular culture and explore its critical possibilities and ramifications from a large variety of perspectives. Proposing a third term that operates beyond the dichotomy of high culture and mass culture and yet offers a fresh approach to both, these essays address a multitude of different topics that can all be classified as unpopular culture. From David Foster Wallace and Ernest Hemingway to Zane Grey, from Christian rock and country to clack cetal, from Steven Seagal to Genesis (Breyer) P-Orridge, from K-pop to The Real Housewives, from natural disasters to 9/11, from thesis hatements to professional sports, these essays find the unpopular across media and genres, and they analyze the politics and the aesthetics of an unpopular culture (and the unpopular in culture) that has not been duly recognized as such by the theories and methods of cultural studies. Martin Lüthe is an associate professor in North American Cultural Studies at the John F. Kennedy-Institute at Freie Universität Berlin. Unpopular Culture Sascha Pöhlmann is an associate professor in American Literary History at Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munich. 240 mm Martin Lüthe and Sascha Pöhlmann (eds) Unpopular Culture ISBN: 978-90-8964-966-9 AUP.nl 9 789089 649669 15 mm Unpopular Culture Televisual Culture The ‘televisual’ names a media culture generally in which television’s multiple dimensions have shaped and continue to alter the coordinates through which we understand, theorize, intervene, and challenge contemporary media culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Hliebing Dissertation Revised 05092012 3
    Copyright by Hans-Martin Liebing 2012 The Dissertation Committee for Hans-Martin Liebing certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Transforming European Cinema : Transnational Filmmaking in the Era of Global Conglomerate Hollywood Committee: Thomas Schatz, Supervisor Hans-Bernhard Moeller Charles Ramírez Berg Joseph D. Straubhaar Howard Suber Transforming European Cinema : Transnational Filmmaking in the Era of Global Conglomerate Hollywood by Hans-Martin Liebing, M.A.; M.F.A. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin May 2012 Dedication In loving memory of Christa Liebing-Cornely and Martha and Robert Cornely Acknowledgements I would like to thank my committee members Tom Schatz, Charles Ramírez Berg, Joe Straubhaar, Bernd Moeller and Howard Suber for their generous support and inspiring insights during the dissertation writing process. Tom encouraged me to pursue this project and has supported it every step of the way. I can not thank him enough for making this journey exciting and memorable. Howard’s classes on Film Structure and Strategic Thinking at The University of California, Los Angeles, have shaped my perception of the entertainment industry, and having him on my committee has been a great privilege. Charles’ extensive knowledge about narrative strategies and Joe’s unparalleled global media expertise were invaluable for the writing of this dissertation. Bernd served as my guiding light in the complex European cinema arena and helped me keep perspective. I consider myself very fortunate for having such an accomplished and supportive group of individuals on my doctoral committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Class Activities*
    CLASS ACTIVITIES* Class 1 January 10 Introduction Students should introduce themselves / name one thing they are hoping to learn from this class Should the law interfere when it comes to our sexual behaviour? Why? Why not? Are there sexual behaviours that should be criminalised but are not? Are there sexual behaviours that are not criminalised, but should be? Class 2 January 17 Discussion Questions Read and analyze the article “Should you ask someone permission to kiss them” and discuss the following questions. Should you ask someone's permission to kiss them? BBC 16 June 2014 Over recent months, there's been a string of headlines about "inappropriate" sexual behaviour and 1 when it tips over into being unlawful. Where are the lines of consent, asks Jo Fidgen. Should you ask someone's permission to kiss them? To many it seems the rules around relationships are changing, and the consequences of getting things wrong can be serious. At the trial of Conservative MP Nigel Evans earlier this year, the court was told that he had tried to kiss someone, been rebuffed, and had backed off. This was regarded by the Crown Prosecution Service as potentially criminal. Evans was acquitted. But the case prompted the question of where we draw the line between a clumsy pass and a sexual offence. The politics of kissing has been on the mind of 29-year-old Evening Standard journalist Rosamund Urwin, who regularly writes about gender relations. "I've been talking about this with friends recently and whether people should say, 'Is it okay if I kiss you now?' and actually I think it's really sweet because what you're saying is, 'I don't want to do something that would upset you'." Some might see that approach as old-fashioned, but harking back to previous values may tackle modern dilemmas over consent.
    [Show full text]
  • Latter-Day Screens
    Latter- day Screens This page intentionally left blank Latter- day Screens GENDER, SEXUALITY, AND MEDIATED MORMONISM Brenda R. Weber duke university press durham and london 2019 © 2019 DUKE UNIVERSITY PRESS. All rights reserved Printed in the United States of Amer i ca on acid- free paper ∞ Designed by Courtney Leigh Baker Typeset in Minion Pro and Helvetica Neue by Westchester Publishing Services Library of Congress Control Number: 2019943713 isbn 9781478004264 (hardcover : alk. paper) isbn 9781478004868 (pbk. : alk. paper) isbn 9781478005292 (ebook) Cover art: Big Love (hbo, 2006–11). Publication of this open monograph was the result of Indiana University’s participation in TOME (Toward an Open Monograph Ecosystem), a col- laboration of the Association of American Universities, the Association of University Presses, and the Association of Research Libraries. TOME aims to expand the reach of long-form humanities and social science scholarship including digital scholarship. Additionally, the program looks to ensure the sustainability of university press monograph publishing by supporting the highest quality scholarship and promoting a new ecology of scholarly publishing in which authors’ institutions bear the publication costs. Funding from Indiana University made it possible to open this publication to the world. This work was partially funded by the Office of the Vice Provost of Research and the IU Libraries. For Michael and Stacey, my North Stars This page intentionally left blank CONTENTS Acknowl edgments ix Past as Prologue. Latter- day Screens and History 1 Introduction. “Well, We Are a Curiosity, Ain’t We?”: Mediated Mormonism ​13 1. Mormonism as Meme and Analytic: Spiritual Neoliberalism, Image Management, and Transmediated Salvation ​49 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Media Studies 11-12 Textbook
    Media Study Guides by Teachers in EDCP 481 Table of Contents Identity & Culture 1. Ma Vie en Rose (Lucas Mann & Marie-Anne Hellinckx) 2. Mean Girls (Chelsea Campbell & Michelle Fatkin) 3. Little Miss Sunshine (Chris Howey & Yik Wah Penner) 4. A Warrior’s Religion (Paramjit Koka & Rupinder Grewal) 5. Thirteen (Kelly Skehill & Kat Ast) 6. 16 and Pregnant (Thomas Froh & Peter Maxwell) 7. My Sister’s Keeper (Stephanie Malloy & Jon Schmidt) 8. One Week (Ashley MacKenzie & Alex Thureau) 9. Schindler’s List (Paul Eberhardt & Rhonda Lochhead) 10. Family Guy & The Simpsons (Amerdeep Nann & Ashley Bayles) 11. Bright Star (Mark Brown) 12. Freedom Writers (Grace Woo & Chris Flannelly) 13. Schindler’s List (Jennifer Olson, Jenn Mansour & Sarah Kharikian) 14. The Television Family (Melissa Evans & Shaun Beach) Culture, Fiction, Power, and Politics 15. Lord of the Rings (Lance Peters & Alex McKillop) 16. The Dark Knight (Adam Deboer & Alvin Lui) 17. Advertising & the End of the World (Safi Arnold & Zachary Pinette) 18. The Office (Fay Sterne & Brittaney Boone) 19. The Corporation (Michael Wuensche & John Ames) 20. Outsourced (Michael Bui & Jennifer Neff) 21. Food Inc. (Liilian Ryan & Sarah James) 22. Mad Men (Graham Haigh & Dean Morris) Environment, Ecology, and Reality 23. Avatar (Wendy Sigaty & Haley Lucas) 24. Wall-e (Rachel Fales & Jennifer Visser) 25. Into the Wild (Kady Huhn and Hannah Yu) 26. Wall-e (Kara Troke and Taha Anjarwalla) 27. 127 Hours (Nick De Santis & Nam Pham) 28. Lost (Dianna Stashuk and Adam Alvaro) Music and Gaming Culture 29. Where is the Love? (Stef Dubrowski & Jess Lee) 30. Popular Music and Videos (Alexander McKechnie) 31.
    [Show full text]