DOCSLIB.ORG

European Parliament

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
European Parliament EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT Directorate-General for Research Directorate A Division for International and Constitutional Affairs RFM/rfm Brussels, 28 February 2002 NOTE on POLAND'S POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC SITUATION AND ITS RELATIONS WITH THE EUROPEAN UNION WITH A VIEW TO ACCESSION This note has been prepared for the information of Members of the European Parliament. The opinions expressed in this document are the author's and do not necessarily reflect the position of the European Parliament. WIP/2002/02/0052-53 [FdR 463073] PE 313.120 CONTENTS 1 POLITICAL SITUATION............................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 HISTORICAL BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................. 4 1.2 INSTITUTIONS................................................................................................................................................. 5 1.3 CURRENT ISSUES AND RECENT DEVELOPMENTS................................................................................................ 6 1.3.1 The results of the September 2001 general election and the party political landscape............................. 6 1.3.2 The new government ............................................................................................................................. 7 1.3.3 External relations ................................................................................................................................. 8 2 ECONOMIC SITUATION .............................................................................................................................. 9 2.1 ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE AND OUTLOOK ..................................................................................................... 10 2.1.1 GDP growth ....................................................................................................................................... 10 2.1.2 Prices and wages................................................................................................................................ 10 2.1.3 Employment........................................................................................................................................ 10 2.1.4 External sector ................................................................................................................................... 11 2.2 ECONOMIC POLICY........................................................................................................................................ 11 2.2.1 Policy background and framework ..................................................................................................... 11 2.2.2 Fiscal policy....................................................................................................................................... 12 2.2.3 Monetary and exchange rate policy..................................................................................................... 13 2.2.4 Privatisation and inward investment ................................................................................................... 13 3 RELATIONS WITH THE EUROPEAN UNION.......................................................................................... 14 3.1 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................................. 14 3.2 THE EU INSTITUTIONS' APPROACH TO ENLARGEMENT .................................................................................... 15 3.2.1 European Commission........................................................................................................................ 15 3.2.2 European Parliament.......................................................................................................................... 17 3.2.3 The Council and the European Council............................................................................................... 18 3.2.4 Negotiations with Poland.................................................................................................................... 19 3.3 POSITION OF THE POLISH GOVERNMENT ........................................................................................................ 20 3.4 PRE-ACCESSION ASSISTANCE, THE ASSOCIATION AGREEMENT AND ACCESSION PARTNERSHIP ....................... 21 3.4.1 Pre-accession aid ............................................................................................................................... 21 3.4.2 Association Agreement........................................................................................................................ 22 3.4.3 Accession Partnership ........................................................................................................................ 22 ANNEX 1 ................................................................................................................................................................. 23 ANNEX 2 ................................................................................................................................................................. 24 ANNEX 3 ................................................................................................................................................................. 25 ANNEX 4 ................................................................................................................................................................. 26 ANNEX 5 ................................................................................................................................................................. 27 ANNEX 6 ................................................................................................................................................................. 29 ANNEX 7 ................................................................................................................................................................. 30 ANNEX 8 ................................................................................................................................................................. 31 WIP/2002/02/0052-53 2 [FdR 463073] PE 313.120 For further information contact: Frank McAvoy, European Parliament, Directorate-General for Research 1047 Brussels e-mail: [email protected] Tel. 0032 2 2842130 General sources: Economist Intelligence Unit, ISI Emerging Markets, Oxford Analytica, Reuters Business Briefing, European Commission, European Parliament. WIP/2002/02/0052-53 3 [FdR 463073] PE 313.120 SUMMARY Poland is the largest and most populous (38.7 m inhabitants) of the EU candidate countries. It submitted its membership application on 5 April 1994. Negotiations opened in March 1998 and, by the end of December 2001, Poland and the EU had provisionally closed discussions on 20 chapters following a change in strategy whereby concessions were made on some outstanding chapters in order to focus on the agricultural, structural funds and budgetary chapters due for negotiation later in 2002. This has not been without its consequences in domestic political terms, as both junior coalition member, the PSL, and the radical opposition parties have reacted critically to the change in approach. However, the strongest feeling has been aroused by the European Commission's recent proposals for paying direct subsidies to farmers after enlargement. Domestic political events have been dominated by the parliamentary elections held on 23 September 2001 and the initial actions of the new coalition government of the Democratic Left Alliance (SLD) - Polish Peasants' Party (PSL). The new government is headed by Leszek Miller of the SLD. The main losers of the election were the ruling Solidarity Election Action - Right (AWS) and its former coalition partner, the Freedom Union, which failed to win any seats in the Sejm, as their vote slumped below the threshold for representation. Populist and eurosceptic parties gained more than a quarter of the votes in the election. GDP growth slowed in 2001 to only 1.1% for the year as a whole, while unemployment has risen from what was already a relatively high level to reach 18%. As domestic demand faltered, import growth was sluggish, helping to narrow the current account deficit. Inflation has also been falling since the highs reached in 2000 ending the year 2001 at 3.6% year on year and thus increasing the pressure on the central bank to cut interest rates further. Fiscal policy remains an area of great concern after the high deficit in 2001 and the likelihood of high deficits for some time to come. The new government faces the problem of boost flagging revenues and cutting spending while attempting to revive the economy. A new economic plan was unveiled at the beginning of 2002. 1 POLITICAL SITUATION 1.1 HISTORICAL BACKGROUND The Polish state is over 1000 years old. In the XVIth century, under the Jagellionian dynasty, Poland was one of the richest and most powerful states in Europe. On 3 May 1791, Poland ratified its first constitution. However, soon after, Poland ceased to exist as state for 123 years following its partition by Russia, Austria and Prussia. The country regained independence in 1918 but was overrun, first by Germany and then by the Soviet Union, in World War II. It regained independence within the Soviet sphere of influence and new
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 37. Posiedzenie Senatu, VII Kadencja
    ISSN0867-261X Senat Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej VII kadencja Sprawozdanie Stenograficzne z 37. posiedzenia Senatu Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej w dniu 3 lipca 2009 r. Warszawa 2009 r. Porz¹dekobrad 37.posiedzeniaSenatuRzeczypospolitejPolskiej wdniu3lipca2009r. 1. Przemówienie Marsza³kaSenatuBogdanaBorusewicza. 2. Przemówienia zaproszonychgoœci. 3. Przemówienie Marsza³ekSenatuIVkadencjiAlicjiGrzeœkowiak. 4. Przemówienie Marsza³kaSenatuVkadencjiLonginaPastusiaka. Obecnisenatorowie:wed³ugza³¹czonejdoprotoko³ulistyobecnoœci. Obecnigoœcieiprzedstawicieleurzêdów: PrezydentRzeczypospolitejPolskiejwlatach1990–1995 –LechWa³êsa PrezydentRzeczypospolitejPolskiejwlatach1995–2005 –AleksanderKwaœniewski OstatniPrezydentRzeczypospolitejPolskiejnaUchodŸstwie –RyszardKaczorowski SzefKancelariiPrezydentaRzeczypospolitejPolskiej –sekretarzstanuPiotrKownacki Wicemarsza³ekSejmuRzeczypospolitejPolskiej –EwaKierzkowska Wicemarsza³ekSejmuRzeczypospolitejPolskiej –JerzySzmajdziñski NuncjuszApostolski,DziekanKorpusuDyplomatycznego –arcybiskupJózefKowalczyk PrezesTrybuna³uKonstytucyjnego –BohdanZdziennicki PrezesNajwy¿szejIzbyKontroli –JacekJezierski RzecznikPrawObywatelskich –JanuszKochanowski RzecznikPrawDziecka –MarekMichalak ZastêpcaPrezesaInstytutuPamiêciNarodowej –KomisjiŒciganiaZbrodniprzeciwkoNarodowiPolskiemu –FranciszekGryciuk WiceprezesNarodowegoBankuPolskiego –WitoldKoziñski Wiceprzewodnicz¹cyKrajowejRadyS¹downictwa –RomanKêska ZastêpcaSzefaKancelariiSejmu –LechCzapla PrezesRz¹dowegoCentrumLegislacji –MaciejBerek Marsza³ekSenatuIVkadencji –AlicjaGrzeœkowiak
    [Show full text]
  • In Pursuit of Liberalism Epstein, Rachel A
    In Pursuit of Liberalism Epstein, Rachel A. Published by Johns Hopkins University Press Epstein, Rachel A. In Pursuit of Liberalism: International Institutions in Postcommunist Europe. Johns Hopkins University Press, 2008. Project MUSE. doi:10.1353/book.3346. https://muse.jhu.edu/. For additional information about this book https://muse.jhu.edu/book/3346 [ Access provided at 30 Sep 2021 14:57 GMT with no institutional affiliation ] This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... In Pursuit of Liberalism . ................................................................................................................................ ........................................................................................................................................................... This page intentionally left blank ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... In Pursuit of Liberalism . International Institutions in Postcommunist Europe . rachel a. epstein . The Johns Hopkins University
    [Show full text]
  • Show Publication Content!
    ISSN 0137-8473 CENTRALNA BIBLIOTEKA WOJSKOWA POLSKA BIBLIOGRAFIA WOJSKOWA fal WARSZAWA 1993 ______________________________________________________ y E x L i b r i s CENTRALNA BIBLIOTEKA WOJSKOWA CBW wewn. 157/94 POLSKA BIBLIOGRAFIA WOJSKOWA TOM LVII ROK 1993 ZESZYT 4 WARSZAWA 1993 Opracował Oddział Bibliografii Wojskowej Centralnej Biblioteki Wojskowej w składzie: Andrzej Grodecki, Renata Igłewska ( sekretarz redakcji), Izabela Kowalska (zastępca redaktora naczelnego), Bożena Materska, Irena Sawicka 0/13^ ><993 T 5^f ZM Pod redakcją Władysława Henzla Okładkę i kartę tytułową projektował Zdzisław Byczek Obj ętość 17 ark. wyd ., 13,75 ark. druk. Pap ier off. kl III B-l g. 80 Druk CBW 7om 600/94 WYKAZ DZIAŁÓW* Wstęp ............................................................................................................................ 8 Wykaz bibliografii, czasopism i dzienników uwzględnionych w T. LVII z. 4 Polskiej B ibliografii Wojskowej ........................................... 10 Wykaz skrótów .............................................................................................................. 14 I. C ZYNNIK M I LITARNY W E W SPÓŁCZESNYM ŚWIECIE . 22 1. Zagadnienia ogólne ............................................................................. 22 2. Rozmowy i rokowania pokojowe. Rozbrojenie. Rokowania i układy rozbrojeniowe ...................................................................... 28 3. Sojusze, układy, pakty wojskowe .................................................. 30 4. Organizacja Narodów Zjednoczonych.
    [Show full text]
  • The Issue of NATO Enlargement in Polish – Russian Relations (Final Report for NATO Fellowship , 2000-2001) Introduction
    1 Prof. Dr Habil. Elzbieta Stadtmuller University of Wroclaw Institute of International Studies Email: [email protected] The Issue of NATO Enlargement in Polish – Russian Relations (final report for NATO Fellowship , 2000-2001) Introduction The rapid changes which took place in Europe towards the end of the 20th century affected all areas of international relations. Constructing a new security system, however, was undoubtedly one of the most sensitive questions. The profundity and speed of the processes inevitably aroused anxiety among all members of international society, and a sense of instability was all-pervasive. The old order built on two ideologically and politically antagonistic blocs - although not accepted by most Europeans, and rejected in the end even by the Soviet Union - at least allowed allies and enemies to be clearly demarcated, and national goals and tasks of organisations to be defined. In the new Europe, emerging after 1989, most elements of that bipolar order came into question – the borders and territorial integrity of states, international relations, the role and aims of international organisations, as well as the internal political, social and economic order of many countries. Simultaneously, fundamental processes on a global scale, stemming from the technological revolution and the development of the global economy, began to be seen as vital for all mankind, leading, as they did, to growing interdependence, to the increasing importance of global problems, and to the necessity for reforms in international organisations and foreign policy. The beginning of the ´90s brought, on the one hand, hope for truly peaceful relationships at last, if not on a global at least on a European scale.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Interactions Between NATO, Poland, the Czech Republic, Bulgaria and Romania After 2000
    Strategic Interactions Between NATO, Poland, the Czech Republic, Bulgaria and Romania After 2000 A Report to the NATO Academic Forum for 1998-2000 By Laure Paquette, Ph.D. Department of Political Science Lakehead University Thunder Bay, Ontario Canada 30 June 2000 1 Executive Summary............................................................3 Chapter 1. Introduction.....................................................5 Chapter 2. Analysis of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization..............37 Chapter 3. The New Member: Poland.........................................50 Chapter 4. The New Member: the Czech Republic..............................66 Chapter 5. The Aspiring Member: Romania...................................82 Chapter 6. Bulgaria........................................................97 2 Executive Summary NATO is newly aware of its increased status as a force for stability in a drastically altered Atlantic community. The number of its initiatives is on the increase just as a new political, economic and military Europe emerges. The Cold War's end has wrought as many changes as there are continuities in the security environment. Eastern and central European states, especially NATO and PfP members, enjoy an increasing importance to NATO, both as trading partners and as new participants in the civil society. While the literature on relations between NATO and the East Europeans is rather limited, the study of the overall posture of those states in the international system is almost non-existent, so that the consequences of their posture for NATO’s renewed concept are unknown. The study of these countries' security posture and strategic interactions with Central European states in general promotes the renewed role of NATO. The study shows that the each of long-term relations with Poland, the Czech Republic, Romania and Bulgaria is subordinated to the goal of entering the European Union, and that their different values will makes relations difficult.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Leaders of Poland's Transformation – in Generational Terms
    DOI: 10.17951/bc.2020.5.9-27 ANNALES UNIVERSITATIS MARIAE CURIE-SKŁODOWSKA LUBLIN – POLONIA VOL. V SECTIO M 2020 Jerzy Sielski [email protected] ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1900-6870 Political leaders of Poland’s transformation – in generational terms Introduction From the viewpoint of methodology foreign literature puts particular atten- tion towards describing the leader’s generation of leaders1 when dealing with Chinese political reality. From the methodological point of view, I accept the concept of dividing politicians in power into those in command, and those who are leaders. The one in command is a decision – maker with political background whose strategic decisions are most important, independent and permanent2. In Poland’s political reality, the criterion of belonging to a generation is associated with two positions: the prime minister and the president. In three cases, the centre of strategic power was and still remains outside the presidential and government centre. The first case concerns the withdrawal of Donald Tusk from the government in 2014 to the centre of power in the European Union. The second case is related to Marian Krzaklewski, who was the then founder of the winning group (Solidarity Electoral Action – AWS) and also managed the 1 Among others L. Dittmer, Chinese Informal Politics, “The China Journal” 1995, no. 34; A. J. Nathan, A Factionalism Model for CCP Politics, “The China Quarterly” 1973, no. 53;C. Li, Chi- na’s Leaders: The New Generation, Rowman and Littlefield Publishers Lauhan 2001; L. W.W. Lam, Chinese politics In the Hu Jintao era: New leaders, new challenge, M.E.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of the Polish Senate [email protected]
    NOTES ON THE SENATE SENATE OF THE REPUBLIC OF POLAND CHANCELLERY OF THE SENATE 6, WIEJSKA STR. | 00-902 WARSAW TEL. 48 22 694 90 34 | FAX 48 22 694 93 06 The history of the Polish Senate [email protected] www.senat.gov.pl The origin of the Polish Senate can be traced back to the Royal Council – the King’s advisory body. Its effect on the evolution of the State and its significance changed over the centuries. In the old Senate, there was not a separate post of the Marshal of the Senate. The Senate's sessions were presided over by the King, who was represented in person by the Grand Mar- shal of the Crown – the principal minister of the Kingdom. In addition, the Grand Marshal of the Crown presided over joint sessions of the Chambers of the Sejm, i.e. the Senate and the Chamber of Deputies. Should the Grand Marshal of the Crown be absent, sessions would be presided over by the Court Marshal. Both of these two Marshals and all senators enjoyed lifelong appointment by the King. The most important senator, i.e. the President of the Senate, was the archbishop of Gniezno as the Primate and the first Duke of the King- dom. The Primate presided over the Senate's sessions in the absence of the King. In addition, the Primate had the right to convene ‘secret’ councils with the Senate, even against the will of the King. During periods of interregnum the Primate became the interrex, i.e. acting mo- narch, and could convene the Sejm.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Dialogue in Face of Changes on the Labour Market in Poland
    Professor Jacek P. Męcina (prof. UW dr hab.), is a lawyer and a political scientist, as well as a social policy expert on labour law, employment relations, employment policy, and social dialogue. His research interests JACEK M are focused on employment and labour market policy, labour law, and collective labour relations, the conditions of functioning of social dialogue JACEKJACEK MMĘĘCINACINA in Poland and in the European countries. Professor at the Institute of Social Policy, the Faculty of Political Science and International Studies at the University of Warsaw, since 2016 Director of the Institute of Social Policy. Scholar of the European Programme TEMPUS and the Alexander von Hum- Social Dialogue boldt Foundation. A member of the Scientifi c Council of the academic journals — Human Resource Management and Social Dialogue and Social Ę in Face of Changes Policy. The Author of more than 100 books, articles, and papers on labour law, labour relations, social CINA in Face of Changes dialogue, employment and labour market issues. He cooperates with the European institutions, the ILO, and many academic and research centres in Poland, Germany and other European countries. on the Labour Market Poland has been building its market economy for slightly more than a quarter of a century and has been a member of the European Union for thirteen years. Currently, Poland can feel the results of the in Poland. international crisis, but with some delay compared to the other European countries. Despite its stable Crisis to Breakthrough From of Changes on the Labour Social Dialogue in Face Market in Poland. economic development and relatively low unemployment, a deterioration in the quality of labour From Crisis relations is noticeable, and what is more Poland recorded a rapid increase in such forms of atypical employment and fi xed-term employment, reaching the highest levels among the EU countries.
    [Show full text]
  • The Calendar of the History of the Polish Senate
    NOTES ON THE SENATE CHANCELLERY OF THE SENATE 6, WIEJSKA STR. | 00-902 WArSAW The calendar of the history TEL. 48 22 694 90 34 | fAx 48 22 694 93 06 [email protected] www.senat.gov.pl of the Polish Senate www.facebook.com/SenatRP The Polish Senate evolved from the Royal Council, which was the monarch’s consultative body created in the middle of the 14th century. From 1493, the Senate was one of the three deliberating estates – with the Chamber of Depu- ties and the King. The role of this Chamber and its significance changed over the centuries. Establishment of the Royal Council, predecessor of the Senate, made up of the mid-14th century highest-ranking state officials, landed dignitaries and bishops (Lords of the Council). The King follows their advice in conducting all the affairs of the king- dom. The start of general assemblies of the whole kingdom, i.e. of the Royal Council 1382 with the participation of district officials, landed gentry and representatives of chapters and cities, convened to elect the King or to introduce taxes. The origin of the Sejm can be traced back to these assemblies. First mention of deliberations at the general assembly in two houses: the Lords 1453 of the Council (Senate) and district deputies. Appointment of four permanent members-residents of the Royal Council of the King. The tradition of convening the full Royal Council in between the general as- od połowy XV w. semblies (the Sejm) – disappears. The King goes into council with some Sena- tors only.
    [Show full text]
  • POLAND October 2001 Country Information and Policy Unit I
    POLAND October 2001 Country Information and Policy Unit I SCOPE OF DOCUMENT II GEOGRAPHY III HISTORY IV INSTRUMENTS OF THE STATE V HUMAN RIGHTS VI HUMAN RIGHTS: SPECIFIC GROUPS ANNEX A: POLITICAL ORGANISATIONS ANNEX B: CHRONOLOGY OF KEY EVENTS ANNEX C: PROMINENT PEOPLE ANNEX D: BIBLIOGRAPHY 1. SCOPE OF DOCUMENT 1.1 This assessment has been produced by the Country Information and Policy Unit, Immigration and Nationality Directorate, Home Office, from information obtained from a variety of sources. 1.2 The assessment has been prepared for background purposes for those involved in the asylum determination process. The information it contains is not exhaustive, nor is it intended to catalogue all human rights violations. It concentrates on the issues most commonly raised in asylum claims made in the United Kingdom. 1.3 The assessment is sourced throughout. It is intended to be used by caseworkers as a signpost to the source material, which has been made available to them. The vast majority of the source material is readily available in the public domain. 1.4 It is intended to revise the assessment on a 6 monthly basis while the country remains within the top 35 asylum producing countries in the United Kingdom. 1.5 An electronic copy of the assessment has been made available to the following organisations: Amnesty International UK Immigration Advisory Service Immigration Appellate Authority Immigration Law Practitioners' Association Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants JUSTICE Medical Foundation for the Care of Victims of Torture Refugee Council Refugee Legal Centre UN High Commissioner for Refugees 2. GEOGRAPHY 2.1 The Republic of Poland is situated in central Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Kalendarium Dziejów Polskiego Senatu
    Noty o Senacie KANCELARIA SENATU UL. WIEJSKa 6 | 00-902 WARSZAWA Kalendarium TEL. 22 694 90 34 | fAx 22 694 93 06 [email protected] www.senat.gov.pl dziejów polskiego Senatu www.facebook.com/SenatRP Senat w Polsce powstał z Rady Królewskiej, która funkcjonowała przy monar- sze od połowy XIV w. Od 1493 r. był – oprócz Izby Poselskiej i króla – jednym z trzech stanów sejmujących Rzeczypospolitej. Rola tej izby i jej znaczenie zmieniały się w ciągu wieków. Powstanie Rady Królewskiej, poprzedniczki Senatu, składającej się z najwyż- połowa XIV w. szych dostojników państwa, dygnitarzy ziemskich, biskupów (Panowie Rady). Król za ich radą kieruje wszystkimi sprawami królestwa. Początek zjazdów generalnych całego królestwa, tj. Rady Królewskiej z udzia- 1382 łem urzędników ziemskich, ogółu szlachty oraz przedstawicieli kapituł i miast, w celu wyboru króla i uchwalenia podatków. To zalążek Sejmu. Pierwsza wzmianka o obradach na zjeździe generalnym w 2 izbach: Panów 1453 Rady (Senat) i posłów ziemskich. Naznaczenie przy królu stałej rezydencji 4 członków Rady Królewskiej. Ustanie tradycji zwoływania Rady Królewskiej w pełnym składzie. Poza zjaz- od połowy XV w. dami generalnymi − Sejmem − król odbywa narady tylko z częścią senatorów. Uformowanie się Sejmu jako organu ogólnopaństwowego, uchwalającego usta- 1493 wy (konstytucje) za zgodą króla, Senatu i Izby Poselskiej. Wydanie przez króla Aleksandra I, pod presją senatorów, w Mielniku przywi- 1501 leju zapewniającego Senatowi ster władzy w państwie. Po koronacji władca od- mawia potwierdzenia tego przywileju. Konstytucja Nihil novi − zrównanie uprawnień Senatu i Izby Poselskiej w stano- 1505 wieniu prawa. Postanowienie Sejmu, że zniewaga senatora równa jest obrazie majestatu 1510 króla. Zakończenie inkorporacji Mazowsza do Królestwa i uzupełnienie składu Sena- 1529 tu o senatorów mazowieckich.
    [Show full text]
  • Dwumiesiкcznik Rok Xiii 2(67)/2005
    EJMOWY DWUMIESIÊCZNIK ROK_ XIII 2(67)/2005 WYDAWNICTWO SEJMOWE KOMITET REDAKCYJNY Redaktor naczelny WIESŁAW SKRZYDŁO Zaste˛pca redaktora naczelnego PAWEŁ SARNECKI, WIESŁAW STAS´KIEWICZ Sekretarz naukowy ANDRZEJ SZMYT Członkowie KRZYSZTOF CZESZEJKO-SOCHACKI, LESZEK GARLICKI, JERZY GÓRAL, MIROSŁAW GRANAT, MARCIN KUDEJ, WOJCIECH KULISIEWICZ, ZBIGNIEW WITKOWSKI, KRZYSZTOF WÓJTOWICZ Redaktor prowadza˛cy URSZULA NAŁE˛CZ-RAJCA Tłumaczenia: na je˛zyk angielski ALBERT POL na je˛zyk rosyjski ANDRZEJ KUBIK W wypadku wykorzystania tekstów i informacji z „Przegla˛du Sejmowego” w innych publikacjach prosimy o powołanie sie˛ na nasze czasopismo. U w a g a. Artykułów nie zamówionych nie zwracamy. Zastrzegamy sobie prawo do skrótów w tekstach nadesłanych do publikacji. © Copyright by Kancelaria Sejmu Warszawa 2005 ISSN 1230-5502 KANCELARIA SEJMU Korekta techniczna, łamanie, druk i oprawa: Wydawnictwo Sejmowe Arkuszy wydawniczych 17,5. Arkuszy drukarskich 13,5 Wydanie pierwsze Warszawa, maj 2005 Nakład 770 egz. Adres: „Przegla˛d Sejmowy”, ul. Zagórna 3, 00-441 Warszawa, tel./fax 694-13-00 e-mail: [email protected] http://www.sejm.gov.pl/wydarzenia/przegla˛d sejmowy SPIS TRES´CI Akt oddania hołdu pamie˛ci Ojca S´wie˛tego Jana Pawła II przez Sejm i Senat Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej 6 kwietnia 2005 roku DZIAŁ I STUDIA I MATERIAŁY Dr Władysław T. Kulesza, Uniwesytet Warszawski Ustawa konstytucyjna z 23 kwietnia 1935 roku . 9 Summary . 48 Prof. dr hab. Eugeniusz Zwierzchowski, Uniwersytet S´la˛ski Prezydent i rza˛d w Konstytucji z 23 kwietnia 1935 roku . 49 Summary . 64 Prof. dr hab. Jacek Czajowski, Uniwersytet Jagiellon´ski Senat w Konstytucji z 23 kwietnia 1935 roku . 65 Summary . 77 Prof.
    [Show full text]