Fifteenth Annual Herman Goldstein Award for Excellence in Problem-Oriented Policing
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Top Cincinnati Fundraisers and Incumbents Win
Top Cincinnati fundraisers and incumbents win For immediate release October 23, 2002 Contact Catherine Turcer, (513) 221-2100 CINCINNATI -- The top fundraising candidates for Mayor and Cincinnati City Council won in 2001, according to a report released today by Ohio Citizen Action. The winning candidate for Mayor, incumbent Charlie Luken, raised 3.9 times more than his three challengers. All of the incumbent candidates also won in 2001. The average incumbent raised 3.7 times more than the average non-incumbent. "Contributions don’t necessarily make victory more likely," said Catherine Turcer, campaign reform director for Ohio Citizen Action. "Often, favor-seekers contribute to a candidate precisely because their victory at the polls is already a foregone conclusion. They want to curry favor with someone who can reciprocate after the election." "Cincinnati’s old campaign financing system, however," Turcer said, "is clearly stacked against challengers and less well-funded candidates." Contribution totals were similar during 1997 ($2,322,158), 1999 ($2,421,109) and 2001 ($2,461,993), according to a report released today by Ohio Citizen Action. 1997 contribution limits, however, changed the giving patterns. The 1997 limits restricted labor unions and Political Action Committees (PACs) and individual limits led some to use family members to inflate contributions. "Cincinnati campaign contributions study," (70 KB .doc). 2001 campaign finance profiles, (13 KB .doc): ● Mayoral candidates: Charlie Luken, Courtis Fuller, William Brodberger, Michael Riley. ● Winning candidates for Cincinnati City Council: Paul Booth, Minette Cooper, John Cranley, David Crowley, Pat DeWine, Chris Monzel, David Pepper, Alicia Reece, Jim Tarbell. ● Losing candidates for Cincinnati City Council: Jane Anderson, Ken Anderson, Toni Andrews, Theophilas Barnes, Lawra Baumann, Y. -
Congressional Directory OHIO
204 Congressional Directory OHIO REPRESENTATIVES FIRST DISTRICT STEVE DRIEHAUS, Democrat, of Cincinnati, OH; born in Cincinnati, June 24, 1966; edu- cation: graduated Elder High School, Cincinnati, OH, 1984; B.A., Miami University, Oxford, OH, 1988; M.P.A., Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, 1995; professional: Ohio House of Representatives, 2001–09; Ohio House Minority Whip, 2005–08; Peace Corps volunteer, Senegal, 1988–90; married: Lucienne Driehaus, 1991; children: Alex, Claire, and Jack; commit- tees: Financial Services, Oversight and Government Reform; elected to the 111th Congress on November 4, 2008. Office Listings http://www.driehaus.house.gov 408 Cannon House Office Building, Washington, DC 20515 .................................... (202) 225–2216 Chief of Staff.—Greg Mecher. FAX: 225–3012 Legislative Director.—Sarah Curtis. Press Secretary.—Tim Mulvey. Scheduler / Executive Assistant.—Heidi Black. Carew Tower, 441 Vine Street, Room 3003, Cincinnati, OH 45202 ......................... (513) 684–2723 District Director.—Steve Brinker. FAX: 421–8722 Counties: BUTLER (part), HAMILTON (part). Population (2000), 630,730. ZIP Codes: 45001–02, 45013–14, 45030, 45033, 45040–41, 45051–54, 45056, 45070, 45201–21, 45223–25, 45229, 45231–34, 45236–41, 45246–48, 45250–53, 45258, 45262–64, 45267–71, 45273–74, 45277, 45280, 45296, 45298–99 *** SECOND DISTRICT JEAN SCHMIDT, Republican, of Miami Township; born in Cincinnati, OH, November 29th; education: B.A., University of Cincinnati, 1974; professional: Miami Township Trustee, 1989– 2000; Ohio House of Representatives, 2000–04; president, Right to Life of Greater Cincinnati, 2004–05; religion: Catholic; married: Peter; children: Emilie; co-chair, Congressional Pro-Life Women’s Caucus; committees: Agriculture; Transportation and Infrastructure; elected to the 109th Congress by special election on August 5, 2005; reelected to each succeeding Congress. -
Lou Dobbs Headlines 2008 Hold Their Feet to the Fire
Lou Dobbs Headlines 2008 Inside . Hold Their Feet to the Fire Census Bureau Projects Immigration ou Dobbs, who has added a nationally Generated Population syndicated radio show to his role as Explosion Lhost of the highly rated CNN pro- PAGE 2 gram, is among 50 or so talk radio personali- ties participating in the 2008 Hold Their Feet FAIR Organizes to the Fire event. Broadcasting from the Postville Rally Phoenix Park Hotel on Capitol Hill on Sep- Supporting tember 10 and 11, talk radio hosts from all Immigration Explosion PAGE 4 across the United States will devote their pro- grams to the issue of immigration. Hold Their Feet to the Fire has become cept and has worked with FAIR and FCFT to Future of E-Verify an annual event, attracting some of the leading expand it into a major annual event. Rests with One talk radio programs to the nation’s capital to Talk radio has had an undeniable impact Senator raise an important issue that many of the na- on the outcome of the immigration debate. PAGE 5 tion’s leaders would prefer to ignore: immi- This year’s Hold Their Feet to the Fire event is gration reform that places the interests of the designed to provide millions of talk radio lis- FAIR Op-Ed American people first. teners in every state with a high profile forum PAGE 6 The 2008 Hold Their Feet to the Fire to express their views about this vital national event is being organized by the FAIR Con- issue. Congressman gressional Task Force (FCTF), a 501(c)(4) or- Energized by the highly successful Hold Compares ICE to ganization affiliated with FAIR. -
Who Rules Cincinnati?
Who Rules Cincinnati? A Study of Cincinnati’s Economic Power Structure And its Impact on Communities and People By Dan La Botz Cincinnati Studies www.CincinnatiStudies.org Published by Cincinnati Studies www.CincinnatiStudies.org Copyright ©2008 by Dan La Botz Table of Contents Summary......................................................................................................... 1 Preface.............................................................................................................4 Introduction.................................................................................................... 7 Part I - Corporate Power in Cincinnati.........................................................15 Part II - Corporate Power in the Media and Politics.....................................44 Part III - Corporate Power, Social Classes, and Communities......................55 Part IV - Cincinnati: One Hundred Years of Corporate Power.....................69 Discussion..................................................................................................... 85 Bibliography.................................................................................................. 91 Acknowledgments.........................................................................................96 About the Author...........................................................................................97 Summary This investigation into Cincinnati’s power structure finds that a handful of national and multinational corporations dominate -
U. S. Radio Stations As of June 30, 1922 the Following List of U. S. Radio
U. S. Radio Stations as of June 30, 1922 The following list of U. S. radio stations was taken from the official Department of Commerce publication of June, 1922. Stations generally operated on 360 meters (833 kHz) at this time. Thanks to Barry Mishkind for supplying the original document. Call City State Licensee KDKA East Pittsburgh PA Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. KDN San Francisco CA Leo J. Meyberg Co. KDPT San Diego CA Southern Electrical Co. KDYL Salt Lake City UT Telegram Publishing Co. KDYM San Diego CA Savoy Theater KDYN Redwood City CA Great Western Radio Corp. KDYO San Diego CA Carlson & Simpson KDYQ Portland OR Oregon Institute of Technology KDYR Pasadena CA Pasadena Star-News Publishing Co. KDYS Great Falls MT The Tribune KDYU Klamath Falls OR Herald Publishing Co. KDYV Salt Lake City UT Cope & Cornwell Co. KDYW Phoenix AZ Smith Hughes & Co. KDYX Honolulu HI Star Bulletin KDYY Denver CO Rocky Mountain Radio Corp. KDZA Tucson AZ Arizona Daily Star KDZB Bakersfield CA Frank E. Siefert KDZD Los Angeles CA W. R. Mitchell KDZE Seattle WA The Rhodes Co. KDZF Los Angeles CA Automobile Club of Southern California KDZG San Francisco CA Cyrus Peirce & Co. KDZH Fresno CA Fresno Evening Herald KDZI Wenatchee WA Electric Supply Co. KDZJ Eugene OR Excelsior Radio Co. KDZK Reno NV Nevada Machinery & Electric Co. KDZL Ogden UT Rocky Mountain Radio Corp. KDZM Centralia WA E. A. Hollingworth KDZP Los Angeles CA Newbery Electric Corp. KDZQ Denver CO Motor Generator Co. KDZR Bellingham WA Bellingham Publishing Co. KDZW San Francisco CA Claude W. -
SWARTSELL-MASTERSREPORT-2013.Pdf (346.7Kb)
DISCLAIMER: This document does not meet current format guidelines Graduate School at the The University of Texas at Austin. of the It has been published for informational use only. The Report Committee for Nikolas R Swartsell Certifies that this is the approved version of the following report: Turning the City Inside Out Shifting Demographics in American Cities APPROVED BY SUPERVISING COMMITTEE: Supervisor: William Minutaglio Co-Supervisor: Robert Jensen Turning the City Inside Out Shifting Demographics in American Cities by Nikolas R. Swartsell, B.A. Report Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts The University of Texas at Austin May 2013 ii Abstract Turning the City Inside Out Shifting Demographics in American Cities Nikolas R. Swartsell, M.A. The University of Texas at Austin, 2013 Supervisor: William Minutaglio Narratives around many of America's inner-city neighborhoods have changed significantly in the past decade. Once portrayed by the media and pop-culture as blighted, dangerous areas to be avoided, these neighborhoods have become hip epicenters of a new philosophy in urban planning-- "place-making," a concept popularized by economist and urbanist Richard Florida. Place-making claims to be a kinder, friendlier kind of urban renewal emphasizing tolerance and diversity-- but is this the case? Through both physical changes and city-lead branding efforts, place-making seeks to draw young professionals, specifically those in the rising "creative class," to inner city areas in hopes these young workers will in turn draw employers. -
Campaign Finance Reform Jurisprudence Under the Roberts Court
Stare Indecisis: Campaign Finance Reform Jurisprudence under the Roberts Court By Andrew Leiendecker Advisor: Professor Chris Edelson, School of Public Affairs For University Honors Spring 2014 Abstract: The following research paper consists of a detailed examination of the Supreme Court’s campaign finance reform jurisprudence under the leadership of Chief Justice John Roberts. This paper examines the holdings and implications of seven primary cases: Randall v. Sorrell (2006), FEC v. Wisconsin Right to Life (2007), Davis v. FEC (2008), Citizens United v. FEC (2010), Arizona Free Enterprise Club PAC v. Bennett (2011), McCutcheon v. FEC (2014), and the forthcoming Susan B. Anthony List v. Driehaus (2014). Examining these cases three overarching problems emerge. First, the Court must reexamine and expand their definition of corruption as applied to campaign finance activities. Second, the Court has severely departed from the pre-Roberts standard (illustrated in Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce and Nixon v. Shrink Missouri Government PAC) of legislative deference on issues of campaign finance. And third, the Roberts Court’s conservative majority appears to be growing more and more comfortable with reversing or ignoring precedential campaign finance cases, including Austin, Nixon, McConnell v. FEC, and even Buckley v. Valeo. This has allowed for a dramatic reduction in the amount of campaign finance regulation in American elections, resulting in an empowering of wealthy individuals, candidates, and corporations to dominate an election cycle at the expense of the voices of everyday Americans, which threatens to undermine the public’s continued faith in our democratic process and the reputation of the Supreme Court itself. -
Xavier Newswire Volume XCV Published Since 1915 by the Students of Xavier University Issue 10
Xavier University Exhibit All Xavier Student Newspapers Xavier Student Newspapers 2009-10-28 Xavier University Newswire Xavier University (Cincinnati, Ohio) Follow this and additional works at: https://www.exhibit.xavier.edu/student_newspaper Recommended Citation Xavier University (Cincinnati, Ohio), "Xavier University Newswire" (2009). All Xavier Student Newspapers. 574. https://www.exhibit.xavier.edu/student_newspaper/574 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Xavier Student Newspapers at Exhibit. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Xavier Student Newspapers by an authorized administrator of Exhibit. For more information, please contact [email protected]. October 28, 2009 XAVIER NEWSWIRE Volume XCV Published since 1915 by the students of Xavier University Issue 10 AlwaYS ONLINE: xavier.edu/ BASKETBALL PREVIEW newswire inside Eight pages of coverage on the upcoming men’s and women’s season @ Sustainability Day focuses on Xavier’s environmental commitment, actions BY SARAH WIETEN University Chicago, spoke on the ed remarks from President Fr. Campus News Editor unique sustainability efforts her Michael Graham, S.J., who noted campus has undertaken, including how far the university had come Sustainability Day, took place a program to power their shuttle but that more work could be yesterday October 27th in Cintas system with biodiesel created from done in the field of sustainabil- Center in front of an audience of vegetable oil waste from their din- ity especially in light of the new over 100 students and about -
RADIO ONE, INC. (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 Form 10-K R ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 OR £ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (NO FEE REQUIRED) For the transition period from to Commission File No. 0-25969 RADIO ONE, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 52-1166660 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 5900 Princess Garden Parkway 7th Floor Lanham, Maryland 20706 (Address of principal executive offices) Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (301) 306-1111 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Class A Common Stock, $.001 par value Class D Common Stock, $.001 par value Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes £ No R Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes £ No R Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. -
OPTIONS ANALYSIS SEPTEMBER 2013 TABLE of CONTENTS
BRENT SPENCE BRIDGE PROJECT OPTIONS ANALYSIS SEPTEMBER 2013 TABLE of CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................... 1 CONSTRUCTION, OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE AND LIFECYCLE COSTS ............................. 2 TRAFFIC & REVENUE .............................................................................................................. 3 RISK ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................................ 3 PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS ......................................................................................................... 4 QUALITATIVE CONSIDERATIONS ............................................................................................ 4 NEXT STEPS ............................................................................................................................ 7 1. PROJECT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES .................................................................... 8 1.1 STUDY OBJECTIVE ......................................................................................................... 8 1.1.1 STUDY PARTICIPANTS AND ADMINISTRATION ......................................................................... 8 1.1.2 THE BI-STATE MANAGEMENT TEAM’S PROJECT GOALS........................................................... 8 1.1.3 PROJECT COSTS ......................................................................................................................... 8 1.1.4 CONSIDERATION -
Case No. 09-2000 Counsel for Appellants
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO KEVIN LONGINO, et al. Case No. 09-2000 Plaintiffs-Appellants On Appeal from the Hamilton V. County Court of Appeals First Appellate District RADIO ONE, INC. et al. Court of Appeals Defendants-Appel lees Case No: 08-0905 DEFENDANT-APPELLEE BLUE CHIP BROADCASTING, LTD.'S MEMORANDUM IN RESPONSE TO JURISDICTION Shondra C. Longino (00081874) Nathaniel Lampley, Jr. (0041543) sclongino7 @ aol.com [email protected] 14055 Cedar Road, Suite 310 Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease t-LP South Euclid, Ohio 44118 221 East Fourth Street Telephone: (216) 932-4444 Suite 2000, Atrium Two Fax: (216) 932-4434 Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 Telephone: (513) 723-4616 Counsel for Appellants Fax: (513) 852-7869 Counsel for Appellee Blue Chip Broadcasting, Ltd. Maria P. Vitullo (0080632) [email protected] Taft, Stettinius & Hollister LLP 425 Walnut Street, Suite 1800 Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 Telephone: (513) 381-2838 Fax: (513) 381-0205 Counsel for Appellee National Underground Railroad Freedom Center TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND FACTS .............................. .................... ......... 't II. STATEMENT IN OPPOSITION TO JURISDICTION ..............................................3 III. BLUE CHIP'S RESONSE TO APPELLANT'S PROPOSITIONS OF LAW............4 A. RESPONSE TO APPELLANT'S PROPOSITION OF LAW NO. I ..............4 B. RESPONSE TO APPELLANT'S PROPOSITION OF LAW NOS. 2 and 3..4 C. RESPONSE TO APPELLANT'S PROPOSITION OF LAW NO. 4 . .............6 D. RESPONSE TO APPELLANT'S PROPOSITION OF LAW NO. 5 ..............7 IV. CONCLUSION ......... ...............................................................................................8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE........................................:.........................................9 I. STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND FACTS The essential facts are these. On February 3, 2007, WDBZ the Buzz, a dba of Defendarit-Appellee Blue Chip Broadcasting, Ltd. -
Entire Issue (PDF)
E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 112 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 157 WASHINGTON, WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 9, 2011 No. 20 Senate The Senate was not in session today. Its next meeting will be held on Thursday, February 10, 2011, at 4 p.m. House of Representatives WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 9, 2011 The House met at 10 a.m. and was to our kids and our grandkids and sidies in the agriculture bill for five called to order by the Speaker pro tem- won’t be paid off over 30 years. Some of crops grown in eight States that are in pore (Mr. WEBSTER). this debt will weigh upon the country. surplus and paying people not to grow f But the question is, how do we get things. That’s off-limits. That’s man- there? The deficit this year will be $1.5 datory spending. That can’t be consid- DESIGNATION OF SPEAKER PRO trillion, an unimaginable amount of ered for cuts, paying people to not TEMPORE money, borrowed, a lot of it from grow things. We can’t do away with The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- China, and that is just virtually that. We’re going to borrow the money fore the House the following commu- unfathomable. so they can get paid to not grow nication from the Speaker: Now, they’re going to dink around es- things. sentially and pretend they’re doing WASHINGTON, DC, All right. Well, how about the oil February 9, 2011.