Common Ground: Windy City Shuffle

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Common Ground: Windy City Shuffle 36 ❘ COMMON GROUND JANUARY FEBRUARY 2019 hether he likes it or not, condominium owner Bob Olsen has been swept up in Chicago’s “deconver- sion” craze. WThe retired exchange broker had just moved into River City Condominiums in 2015 when he learned the company that owns the commercial segment of the mixed-use complex wanted windycity to buy its 450 residential units and turn them all into apartments. Under Illinois law, a buyer can effectively force the sale of a large condominium building if 75 percent of the association approves a bulk sale, provided the declara- tions do not call for a higher margin of support. “That was news to me,” says Olsen, who purchased a total of three condominium units at River City, a futur- istic Bertrand Goldberg- designed development in shufFLe the South Loop he had long admired. “I think it’s basically a license to steal property. I know those are strong words. A series of condo ‘deconversions’ It just invites corruption, in my view.” in Chicago is beginning to draw Olsen voted against mul- tiple offers, which report- attention, both good and bad. edly were in the $90 million range. In October, he was among a group of plain- By Mike Ramsey tiffs who sought to apply the brakes when it was Photography by Patsy McEnroe announced buyers had finally received the necessary level of support. The condominium board countersued to make CONVERSION CONTROVERSY. Multiple offers have been made to buy out owners of River owners comply with the City Condominiums, a mixed-use complex completed in 1986 along the South Branch of the Chicago River, and convert the community into apartments. If the conversion goes through, it purchase. A settlement was would be one of many to occur in the Windy City in recent years. pending at press time. JANUARY FEBRUARY 2019 COMMON GROUND ❘ 37 BITTERSWEET SALE? Ninety percent of condominium unit owners in 732 Bittersweet Way, in the city’s lakefront neighborhood of Buena Park, approved the offer of $16.2 million to convert the building into rentals. Owners stood to make double the market value for their one-bedroom or studio units. MOST DECONVERSIONS have gone been converted into comparatively smoothly, without legal condominium units in action or public outcry. In fact, owners the early 2000s but was typically have received a financial pre- morphing back into mium to part with their condominium rentals. units. This unusual cycle in Chicago has “This building had been driven by a demand for multifamily a huge number of rent- rental stock and the aforementioned Illi- ers. We were almost at nois law that sets an attainable trigger to 50 percent who were acquire an entire condominium property. just investors, and they Now, the question seems to be: How were looking for an long can this continue? exit,” Goss says. “The low-hanging fruit has pretty Interra Realty much filtered through the market,” says fielded proposals from David Goss, co-founder and manag- interested buyers and ing principal of Chicago’s Interra Realty, took a $16.2 million which has brokered at least 10 bulk sales offer to owners. Asso- worth nearly $100 million on behalf of ciation members stood to make double member at the Bittersweet Way property, condominium associations since 2015. the market value for their one-bedroom or told Crain’s Chicago Business in 2017. “The secret’s out, but that doesn’t matter. studio units, Goss says. About 90 percent of There are still a lot of deals happening.” the ownership approved of the sale, he says. UNCOMMON OCCURRENCE, He says his firm’s expertise in the real- “When we valued it as commercial ONCE estate niche began with an inquiry about real estate we realized that, ‘Hey, this is For years, the termination of condomin- a condominium building in the lakefront more than what the individual build- ium associations was rare, anywhere. Per- neighborhood of Buena Park. The 101- ing units have listed for in five years,’ ” haps the most frequently cited anecdote unit structure at 732 Bittersweet Way had Lexia Krown, a condominium association was the demise of Naranja Lakes, a South MCENROE PHOTOGRAPHY INC. © PATSY 38 ❘ COMMON GROUND JANUARY FEBRUARY 2019 OVER THE RIVER. Bob Olsen is among a group of River City owners who filed a suit to halt the sale of the complex. The community’s commercial owner reportedly has offered residential owners around $90 million. Among the significant capital expenditures River City owners face is a leaky atrium roof. Florida condominium association that was leveled by deadly Hurricane Andrew in 1992. The Illinois Condominium Property Act dates back to 1963. State lawmakers may have had catastrophic events in mind when they included a bulk-sale component, sometimes referred to as “Section 15.” “I think when the Condo Act was ini- tially contemplated, the law didn’t imagine that some entity could create an offer that would be so lucrative that existing owners would jump at the chance to get out,” says Chicago attorney Howard S. Dakoff, a fellow in CAI’s College of Community five years, it’s switched to opportunistic may require significant capital expendi- Association Lawyers (CCAL). buyers, with the trend kind of hitting a tures that owners prefer to avoid. Olsen Dakoff, who has worked on several fever pitch in the last two years.” notes his concrete-facade building, com- deconversions, says the current Windy New construction of rental property, pleted in 1986 along the South Branch of City craze has its origins in the recession especially Class A stock around Chicago’s the Chicago River, has a beautiful indoor of a decade ago. At that time, some newly Loop, has been healthy of late. Many atrium that, unfortunately, leaks. completed condominium projects were deconverters seem to be looking in outly- “There are always buckets in the transformed into apartment buildings out ing neighborhoods for older condomin- atrium. It’s not dangerous or anything, I’ve of necessity (Florida also saw a burst of ium buildings to acquire and upgrade, if just learned to live with them,” he says. deconversions for the same reason.). they can do it at a cost that is reasonable As Class B rental stock, these “Banks took back the bulk unsold to them. revamped condominium buildings can units,” says Dakoff, a partner at Leven- Like River City, many of these sought- still draw lucrative rents as apartment feld Pearlstein. “Developers started to after Chicago properties started off as towers. Potential tenants range from buy those units and thought, ‘If I own 95 apartment buildings before being con- young professionals to empty-nesters who percent of the units, why don’t I buy the verted into condominiums under previous wish to live in the city but don’t want to other 5 percent and deconvert?’ In the last market conditions. These structures now take on a mortgage. JANUARY FEBRUARY 2019 COMMON GROUND ❘ 39 RENTAL DEMAND. The deconversion trend in Chicago has been driven by a demand for multifamily rental stock. River City’s prime location (seen here) could draw lucrative rents from young professionals and empty-nesters who wish to live in the city but don’t want to take on a mortgage. Suburban condominiums also have drawn interest from real-estate investors. A company offered $42.2 million for River Trails Condominiums (opposite page, below) in northern Chicago suburb Prospect Heights. The deal was scuttled by a lawsuit. Dakoff says buyers in the transac- In many cases, Goss says, building the sale of River City Condominiums tions he’s worked on have been real estate buyers will agree to lease to residents for claimed some owners were being offered investment trusts, or REITs, while Goss up to a year at a preferred rate. side deals to secure their support. says his firm has dealt with established “There are some landlords who don’t “I had a lot of voicemails, let’s put it companies that own and manage large want to have these holdovers, these cheap that way,” Olsen says, when asked if he apartment buildings in Chicago and rents, but that’s the price you have to pay. was approached. nearby suburbs. It’s a deal-sweetener,” he says. His group engaged Bloomberg, who “You’re looking at all sorts of multi- There are other potential sticking points. typically has represented condominium family investors that are looking at new Some condominium unit owners may have boards or developers. The attorney declined vehicles by which to obtain assets for their invested significant money in their resi- to discuss the case or the pending settle- portfolios. It’s just a new line of stock that dences and insist they deserve more money ment between his clients and the River maybe they weren’t thinking about years than a neighbor who hasn’t. Goss says he City board, but he stressed transparency is ago,” says Chicago lawyer David Bloom- tells these owners, simply, “You need to look paramount in deconversions: “Especially berg, principal at Chuhak & Tecson, who at this in a vacuum. Are you getting enough under the statute in Illinois, where you’re has worked on several deconversions in money to make you happy?” looking at a high number of unit owners the past four years. “(Associations) get a lump sum offer, who will be forced to sell their building Not surprisingly, Goss says, the easiest and it’s split by percentage ownership,” he against their stated will.” properties to acquire have been buildings adds. “Because if you start doing some- That, of course, is the obvious flip where there is a significant percentage of thing else, it’s a can of worms, and you’ll side of deconversion: Somebody usually investors.
Recommended publications
  • Reducing the Cost of Crime Free Alternative Strategies to Crime Free/Nuisance Property Ordinances in Illinois
    Reducing the Cost of Crime Free Alternative Strategies to Crime Free/Nuisance Property Ordinances in Illinois A Model Ordinance by Open Communities and The Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law Reducing the Cost of Crime Free: Alternative Strategies to Crime Free/Nuisance Property Ordinances in Illinois In August 2013 the Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law released The Cost of Being “Crime Free”: Legal and Practical Consequences of Crime Free Rental Housing and Nuisance Property Ordinances.1 This report outlined some of the real costs to local municipalities who enact these ordinances, including the serious fair housing implications of advancing and enforcing such laws. Reducing the Cost of Crime Free: Alternative Strategies to Crime Free/Nuisance Property Ordinances in Illinois responds to the growing recognition that these local ordinances may harm tenants and landlords, impede fair housing, and expose local governments to liability. It offers municipalities the tools necessary to create rental housing policies that value quality, safe rental housing while also protecting protected classes and respecting the rights of landlords and tenants. Both Open Communities and The Shriver Center are available to provide technical assistance to local municipalities in the drafting of these ordinances. Cover: Multifamily rental buildings left to right Evanston, Niles, Skokie, and Park Ridge: Photos by Brendan Saunders 1 http://povertylaw.org/sites/default/files/files/housing-justice/cost-of-being-crime-free.pdf OPEN COMMUNITIES AND THE SARGENT SHRIVER NATIONAL CENTER ON POVERTY LAW 1 Acknowledgements Open Communities and the Shriver Center would like to thank the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Fair Housing Initiatives Program, for its support of this project’s concept: to strengthen a municipality’s ability to provide for decent and safe rental housing in its jurisdiction while honoring the fair housing and due process rights of tenants.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix A: Statements of Interest and FRAP 29(A)(4)(A) Statements
    Appendix A: Statements of Interest and FRAP 29(a)(4)(A) Statements 1. National Housing Law Project The National Housing Law Project (NHLP) is a nonprofit organization that advances housing justice for poor people and communities, predominantly through technical assistance and training to legal aid attorneys and co-counseling on key litigation. NHLP works with organizers and other advocacy and service organizations to strengthening and enforce tenants’ rights, increase housing opportunities for underserved communities, and preserve and expand the nation’s supply of safe and affordable homes. In addition to various other publications and training materials, since 1981 NHLP has published HUD Housing Programs: Tenants’ Rights. Commonly known as the “Greenbook,” this volume—now on its fourth edition and regularly supplemented between editions—is known as the seminal authority on HUD tenants and program participants’ rights by tenant advocates and other housing professionals throughout the country. NHLP also coordinates the Housing Justice Network, a collection of over 1,000 legal services attorneys, advocates, and organizers from around the country. The network has actively shared resources and collaborated on important and complex housing law issues for over 40 years, including through a dynamic listserv, working groups, and a periodic national conference. NHLP has been specifically involved with the implementation of the Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) regulation, including by providing training and developing AFFH materials as a subcontracting technical assistance provider for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). NHLP has also provided training and technical assistance to members of the Housing Justice Network and other stakeholders regarding 1 implementation of the AFFH Rule, including in-depth assistance to advocates in San Mateo County, California, who participated in that County’s regional Assessment of Fair Housing.
    [Show full text]
  • The Segregation of Opportunities (2005)
    University of Minnesota Law School Scholarship Repository Studies Institute on Metropolitan Opportunity 2005 The egS regation of Opportunities John Lukehart University of Minnesota Law School Tom Luce Jason Reece Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.umn.edu/imo_studies Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation John Lukehart, Tom Luce & Jason Reece, The Segregation of Opportunities (2005). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Minnesota Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Studies collection by an authorized administrator of the Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Segregation of Opportunities The Structure of Advantage and Disadvantage in the Chicago Region A Report of the Leadership Council for Metropolitan Open Communities John Lukehart Leadership Council for Metropolitan Open Communities Tom Luce Institute on Race and Poverty University of Minnesota Jason Reece Kirwan Institute on Race and Ethnicity The Ohio State University May 2005 Acknowledgements The Leadership Council for Metropolitan Open Communities would like to thank the many contributors to this report. First of all, we want to acknowledge the tremendous contributions made by folks at the Institute on Race and Poverty (IRP) at the University of Minnesota and the Kirwan Institute on Race and Ethnicity at Ohio State. Tom Luce, research director at IRP, did the lion’s share of identifying, collecting, and analyzing the data and developing the methods for presenting it in a meaningful and coherent way. Jason Reece, research associate at the Kirwan Institute, provided support in this effort. Myron Orfield, director at IRP, and john powell, director at the Kirwan Institute have provided essential guidance, as well as significant in-kind financial support, to make this study possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Racial Discrimination in Housing
    Cover picture: Members of the NAACP’s Housing Committee create signs in the offices of the Detroit Branch for use in a future demonstration. Unknown photographer, 1962. Walter P. Reuther Library, Archives of Labor and Urban Affairs, Wayne State University. (24841) CIVIL RIGHTS IN AMERICA: RACIAL DISCRIMINATION IN HOUSING A National Historic Landmarks Theme Study Prepared by: Organization of American Historians Matthew D. Lassiter Professor of History University of Michigan National Conference of State Historic Preservation Officers Consultant Susan Cianci Salvatore Historic Preservation Planner & Project Manager Produced by: The National Historic Landmarks Program Cultural Resources National Park Service US Department of the Interior Washington, DC March 2021 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................... 1 HISTORIC CONTEXTS Part One, 1866–1940: African Americans and the Origins of Residential Segregation ................. 5 • The Reconstruction Era and Urban Migration .................................................................... 6 • Racial Zoning ...................................................................................................................... 8 • Restrictive Racial Covenants ............................................................................................ 10 • White Violence and Ghetto Formation ............................................................................. 13 Part Two, 1848–1945: American
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED STATES of AMERICA DEPARTMENT of HOUSING and URBAN DEVELOP'/ NT OFFICE of ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES the Secretary, United
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOP'/ NT OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES The Secretary, United States HUDALJ 05-91-0969-1 Department of Housing and Urban Date:February 10, 1994 Development, on behalf of The Leadership Council for Metropolitan Open Communities, Charging Party, and The Leadership Council for Metropolitan Open Communities and Marsha Allen, Intervenors V. Stanley Jancik, Respondent. INITIAL DECISION AND ORDER ON APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEY FEES Background On November 30, 1993, Intervenors, the Leadership Council for Metropolitan Open Communities ("the Council") and Marsha Allen, a Council employee, filed a Petition for Attorney Fees. The Council is a non-profit organization dedicated to promoting equal opportunities in housing in the metropolitan Chicago area. Intervenors seek $23,842.50 in attorney fees. Respondent, Stanley Jancik, filed a Response to the Petition on December 6, 1993.' I find that Intervenors are entitled to the amount of fees requested. IOn October 1, 1993, I issued an Initial Decision and Order finding that Respondent had discriminated against Intervenors in violation of the Fair Housing Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. '' 3601, et seq. I awarded damages to the Council and Ms. Allen, exclusive of legal fees, and imposed a civil penalty and an injunctive order on Respondent. On December 6, 1993, Respondent filed an appeal of the Initial Decision with the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. That appeal is still pending. Intervenors seek fees for Edward Voci, the Council's General Counsel and Legal Director, and for Mark Freedman, Mr. Voci's law clerk who was a second year law student at the time of the hearing.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil Rights Organizations Add Cities and New Evidence to Housing Discrimination Complaint Against U.S
    For Immediate Release October 15, 2013 Contact: Naweed Lemar 202-898-1661, ext. 119 [email protected] Civil Rights Organizations Add Cities and New Evidence to Housing Discrimination Complaint against U.S. Bank New Cities: Baton Rouge, Indianapolis, Memphis, and Milwaukee New Cities and New Evidence: Metropolitan Chicago New Evidence: Baltimore WASHINGTON, D.C. — Today, the National Fair Housing Alliance and six of its member organizations announced that they have amended their federal housing discrimination complaint against U.S. Bank National Association. The civil rights groups allege that U.S. Bank continues to maintain and market foreclosed homes in white neighborhoods in a much better manner than in African-American and Latino neighborhoods. Failing to maintain and market homes because of the racial or ethnic composition of the neighborhood violates the federal Fair Housing Act. The new metropolitan areas added to the complaint are Baton Rouge, Indianapolis, Memphis, and Milwaukee. Evidence already in the complaint from the Chicago metropolitan area is being supplemented with new properties near Chicago in the cities of Aurora, Dolton, Evanston, Hazel Crest, Matteson, Waukegan and Country Club Hills. NFHA has also provided HUD with new evidence in Baltimore supporting their allegations of a continuing violation by U.S. Bank. The six member organizations that filed the complaint with NFHA are the Fair Housing Center of Central Indiana, HOPE Fair Housing Center (Illinois), South Suburban Housing Center (Illinois), Open Communities (Illinois), Metropolitan Milwaukee Fair Housing Council, and Greater New Orleans Fair Housing Action Center. The complaint now brings the total to 24 cities in 11 metropolitan areas where U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • United States District Court District of the District of Columbia
    Case 1:17-cv-02192-BAH Document 15-1 Filed 11/08/17 Page 1 of 51 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA OPEN COMMUNITIES ALLIANCE, et al., Plaintiffs, Civ. Action No. 1:17-cv-02192 (BAH) v. Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell BEN CARSON, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Case 1:17-cv-02192-BAH Document 15-1 Filed 11/08/17 Page 2 of 51 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES .......................................................................................................... ii INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................................1 STATEMENT OF FACTS ..............................................................................................................3 I. Overview of the HCV Program and Fair Market Rents ................................................3 II. Problems with Fair Market Rents Based on Broad Metropolitan Areas .......................4 III. HUD’s Experience With Small Area FMRs and Their Alternatives ...........................10 IV. The Small Area FMR Rulemaking ..............................................................................11 V. The Interim Evaluation ................................................................................................14 VI. HUD’s Sudden Suspension of the Small Area FMR Rule ..........................................16 ARGUMENT .................................................................................................................................19
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Zoning for Fair and Open Communities
    GUIDE A Guide to Zoning for Fair and Open Communities Connecticut Fair Housing Center June 2013 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................. 1 2. Housing ...................................................................................... 3 3. Zoning ........................................................................................ 5 4. Zoning Reform ............................................................................. 6 5. Community .................................................................................. 7 6. Beyond Zoning ............................................................................. 8 Appendices Appendix A — Glossary of Terms ............................................................. 9 Appendix B — Zoning and the Fair Housing Act ............................................ 10 Appendix C — Summary of Fair Housing Laws ............................................. 11 Appendix D — Resources ...................................................................... 12 A Guide to Zoning for Fair and Open Communities 2013, Connecticut Fair Housing Center The Connecticut Fair Housing Center, Inc. (CFHC) is a statewide non-profit organization working to make sure that all who seek housing have an equal opportunity to rent, purchase, finance or insure the property they choose. CFHC identifies and strives to eliminate barriers to fair housing in Connecticut. Because the state’s low-income residents are particularly affected by discriminatory
    [Show full text]
  • Housing & Neighborhood Development Land Use and Development
    Housing & Neighborhood Development Land Use and Development Background Housing Framework The cornerstone of a city’s quality of life is its housing opportunities and Three components of West neighborhood selection. All citizens desire safe, secure, and good quality Melbourne’s Housing and housing and great neighborhoods. Although the provision of housing within the city limits is largely a function of the private sector, the public sector plays Neighborhood a role in helping ensure that the housing needs of all citizens are met. Development Framework Specifically, the city is responsible for ensuring that the city’s housing are: opportunities provide for the diverse need of the community by addition needs regarding housing affordability, special needs, and multi-generational needs. 1) Support the city’s quality of life through highly The most important element that addresses issues involved with the issues of the provision of housing options and protection of quality neighborhoods desirable and distinct is the Housing and Neighborhood Development Element. As the element that housing opportunities establishes the planning framework for the promotion of housing and neighborhoods. opportunities and neighborhood diversity in the City of West Melbourne, this 2) Provide all citizens element is vital to addressing the planning concerns related to housing and neighborhood concerns. desire safe, secure, and good quality housing in Planning Framework great neighborhoods. 3) Promote an array of The objectives and policies established in the Housing & Neighborhood housing options and a Development Element provide the foundation for a planning framework which: variety of diverse . Ensures housing opportunities are available to residents of all income neighborhood in levels.
    [Show full text]
  • Hhc-Packet-20160204
    Memorandum To: Housing and Homelessness Commissioners From: Sarah Flax, Housing and Grants Administrator Subject: February 4, 2016 HHC Meeting Cover Memo Date: February 3, 2016 Attached please find: The meeting agenda Item 2: Draft minutes of the January 7, 2016 meeting for approval Item 4: Affordable Housing Demolition Tax and Affordable Housing Fund, Section 4-18-1 through 4-18-5 and IHO Ordinance 60-O-15 Item 6: Draft Housing and Homelessness Commission Report for 2015 Considerations for updating the Affordable Housing Fund (AHF) description/purpose and its eligible uses include: Restructuring the definition of the Affordable Housing Fund to have the Demolition Tax as one of its sources of revenue. Currently fees in lieu of affordable units in developments covered by the IHO are not referenced in the Affordable Housing Fund description. Other sources of revenue for affordable housing that the commission will be evaluate and recommend as part of the 2016 work plan may need to be included. Consider if the current description of eligible uses of funds should be changed or expanded. Currently is “programs including, but not limited to: down payment and/or rental assistance; building rehabilitation and /or construction loans; property acquisition and disposition; and grants to nonprofit organizations that serve households that earn less than 100% of area median income.” Other considerations include: o Emergency/temporary/transitional housing for homeless individuals/families, and tracking and management systems such as the Homeless Information Management System (HMIS) that has been funded from the AHF to meet local matching requirements o Types of programs – landlord tenant, pre- and post-purchase housing counseling, renter training, landlord training, other o Use of funds for administration.
    [Show full text]
  • Alternative Strategies to Crime Free/Nuisance Property Ordinances in Illinois
    Reducing the Cost of Crime Free: Alternative Strategies to Crime Free/Nuisance Property Ordinances in Illinois October 2015 A Model Ordinance by: 1 Reducing the Cost of Crime Free: Alternative Strategies to Crime Free/Nuisance Property Ordinances in Illinois In August 2013 the Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law released The Cost of Being “Crime Free”: Legal and Practical Consequences of Crime Free Rental Housing and Nuisance Property Ordinances.1 This report outlined some of the real costs to local municipalities who enact these ordinances, including the serious fair housing implications of advancing and enforcing such laws. Reducing the Cost of Crime Free: Alternative Strategies to Crime Free/Nuisance Property Ordinances in Illinois responds to the growing recognition that these local ordinances may harm tenants and landlords, impede fair housing, and expose local governments to liability. It offers municipalities the tools necessary to create rental housing policies that value quality, safe rental housing while also protecting protected classes and respecting the rights of landlords and tenants. Both Open Communities and The Shriver Center are available to provide technical assistance to local municipalities in the drafting of these ordinances. Cover: Multifamily rental buildings left to right Evanston, Niles, Skokie, and Park Ridge: Photos by Brendan Saunders 1 http://povertylaw.org/sites/default/files/files/housing-justice/cost-of-being-crime-free.pdf 2 Acknowledgements Open Communities and the Shriver Center would like to thank the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Fair Housing Initiatives Program, for its support of this project’s concept: to strengthen a municipality’s ability to provide for decent and safe rental housing in its jurisdiction while honoring the fair housing and due process rights of tenants.
    [Show full text]
  • Closing the Divide Creating Equitable, Inclusive, and Affordable Communities
    Closing the Divide Creating Equitable, Inclusive, and Affordable Communities PREPARED BY Regional Affordable and Fair Housing Roundtable Closing the Divide Creating Equitable, Inclusive, and Affordable Communities Prepared by the Regional Affordable and Fair Housing Roundtable Co-convened by Enterprise Community Partners and the Fair Housing Justice Center Published January 2019 Acknowledgements In October 2017, Enterprise Community Partners, Inc. (Enterprise) and the Fair Housing Justice Center (FHJC) launched the Regional Affordable and Fair Housing Roundtable. This cohort, comprised of nearly 30 affordable housing, community development, fair housing, for- and nonprofit organizations, set out to achieve several important goals. The first was to educate affordable housing and fair housing organizations on key areas of concern impacting both sectors, a period of engagement that helped to build trust and provide a basic level of understanding among all participants. The second goal was to identify shared priorities affecting both the affordable and fair housing industries that both sectors could collectively work to advance or support in various ways. The third goal was to create a dynamic working group, enabling both sectors to have candid discussions, sometimes around areas of contention, in order to develop a shared policy platform. Enterprise Community Partners, Inc. is a national affordable housing intermediary that works to ensure that every family has a safe, affordable home in neighborhoods of opportunity by incubating programs to create solutions to challenging housing problems; investing capital to support the production of affordable housing; and advocating for policies that transform the system and bring more resources to the sector. The Fair Housing Justice Center is a nonprofit, civil rights organization dedicated to eliminating housing discrimination; promoting policies and programs that foster more open, accessible, and inclusive communities; and strengthening enforcement of fair housing laws in the New York City region.
    [Show full text]