DOCSLIB.ORG

Lost and Found Property

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lost and Found Property Security OFFICIAL Classification: POLICY Lost and Found Property Head of Joint Justice Services Policy owners Command Policy holder Head of Criminal Justice Property Management and Vehicle Author Recovery Coordinator Approved by Legal Services N/A Policy owner 22 January 2018 JJNCC Pending Note: By signing the above you are authorising the policy for publication and are accepting responsibility for the policy on behalf of the Chief Constables Publication date 5 February 2018 Review date 5 February 2021 APP checked Yes College of Policing Yes Code of Ethics checked Note: Please send the original Policy with both signatures on it to the Norfolk CPU for the audit trail Security OFFICIAL Classification: Page 1 of 28 Security OFFICIAL Classification: Index 1. Introduction .................................................................................................. 4 2. Lost property ............................................................................................... 5 3. Found Property ............................................................................................ 6 4. Theft by Finding ........................................................................................... 9 5. Property Claimed by the Loser before being placed at a Station ............... 10 6. Property from Sudden Deaths ................................................................... 10 7. Treasure Finds .......................................................................................... 10 8. Sea and Seashore Finds ........................................................................... 11 Appendix A: Lost and found property – front counter guide ............................. 12 9. Appendix B: Letter for insurance claims .................................................... 25 10. Appendix C: Lost and Found – Recording on the Electronic Property System (EPS) .................................................................................................. 26 11. Appendix D: Found Property (excluding pedal cycles – see Appendix E) . 27 12. Appendix E: Pedal Cycles ......................................................................... 28 Legal Basis (Please list below the relevant legislation which is the legal basis for this policy). You must update this list with changes in legislation that are relevant to this policy and hyperlink directly to the legislation. Legislation/Law specific to the subject of this policy document Act (title and year) Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 Police (Conduct) Regulations 1999 Police Reform Act 2002 Police Property Act 1897 and Regulations Magistrates Courts Act 1980 Theft Act 1968 Obscene Publications Act 1959 Firearms Act 1968 Prevention of Crime Act 1953 Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 The Police (Retention and Disposal of Motor Vehicles) Regulations 2002 Treasure Act 1996 Other legislation/law which you must check this document against (required by law) Act (title and year) Human Rights Act 1998 (in particular A.14 – Prohibition of discrimination) Equality Act 2010 Crime and Disorder Act 1998 Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 and associated Regulations Data Protection Act 1998 Freedom Of Information Act 2000 Security OFFICIAL Classification: Page 2 of 28 Security OFFICIAL Classification: Other Related Documents Recovery and Disposal of Ballistic Items FPD Firearms and Explosives Licencing FPD Property Seized Subject to Enquiry FPD Both Norfolk and Suffolk Constabularies have in place a Business Continuity Plan to enable the continued function of Police Property Stores at their Tier 1 & 2 premises in the event of a business continuity scenario occurring Security OFFICIAL Classification: Page 3 of 28 Security OFFICIAL Classification: 1. Introduction 1.1 You must be able to show that your actions are justified and proportionate in seeking to achieve your aim(s). Additionally, you must always consider whether the proposed action is the least intrusive and damaging option used to achieve the aim(s). If you are in doubt you must consult a supervisor. 1.2 The Forces use an Electronic Property System (EPS) to record Lost and Found property and also seized Volume and Drug property. You should always clearly document the decision making processes and outcomes of actions. This is achieved by recording all property on the EPS. 1.3 The importance of accuracy and care in dealing with all types of property in Police possession is crucial. 1.4 All property coming into the possession of the Police must be dealt with attention to detail and with extreme care. Under no circumstances must property be left unsecured in an office or other location not designated for the storing of property. 1.5 The storage by the Police of property is inconvenient, costly and should be avoided wherever possible. It will be disposed of at the earliest opportunity. 1.6 To safeguard both property and personnel who handle it, the following fundamental principles will apply: All property in Police possession will be kept in secure conditions. When property passes possession from the custody of one clearly identified individual or store to another, the fact will be recorded on the EPS. All property coming into Police possession will be appropriately handled according to its type and any Health and Safety considerations. For example, LPG (liquefied petroleum gas) cylinders will be kept in an outside store. All property coming into Police possession must be appropriately packaged with consideration given to whether the item has elements which can erode or degrade during retention, e.g. batteries. Found property will only be released from Police possession to an owner upon satisfactory proof of ownership. Found property will only be released from Police possession to a person authorised in writing by an acknowledged owner, or the registered finder, after a 28 day retention period has elapsed. Prohibited items will not be returned. Security OFFICIAL Classification: Page 4 of 28 Security OFFICIAL Classification: 2. Lost property 2.1 If an item of property has been lost in a public area (e.g. road, beach, town) the loss will be recorded if it meets the criteria listed in Appendix A. 2.2 If an item of property has been lost on private property or public transport, it is recommended that, unless the item is of the type specified in Appendix A, the loser should contact the owner of the private premises or the public transport service provider as they will often have their own ‘Lost and Found’ procedures. Private property includes shops, pubs, clubs, leisure centres, taxis, coaches and schools. 2.3 Lost property reports will be recorded on the EPS for any item that poses a risk to the safety or security of the public, e.g. Firearms, ammunition or explosives. Other weapons. Poisons or chemicals. Prescription medication. 2.4 If the lost property is likely to be a danger to others, immediate action should be taken to minimise risk and locate the item. This may include: Creating a STORM event. Bringing the matter to the attention of the CCR Inspector (Oscar 1). Circulating information (PNC broadcast, local & social media). In the case of reported losses of firearms, ammunition or explosives please also refer to the ‘Firearms and Explosives Licencing’ FPD as an offence may have occurred and there may be grounds to revoke the firearms licence / certificate. 2.5 Lost property reports will be recorded for electronic devices with internal memory and that may contain personal data, e.g. mobile telephones, digital cameras, laptops, portable music players, tablets, memory sticks, game consoles and other electronic items. 2.6 When a lost property report is taken, the EPS will be checked in case the item is already in Police possession. 2.7 If it is identified that a reported loss is in Police possession within ‘Volume Crime’, the reporting member of the public should be advised there is no record within the found property register but we do have an item matching the description in Police possession and the OIC will be notified to make contact with the owner. Security OFFICIAL Classification: Page 5 of 28 Security OFFICIAL Classification: 2.8 If it is identified the item of property has been handed in as ‘found’ the staff member dealing with the lost report will arrange for the item to be returned to a station where the owner can verify whether the item in question is theirs. 2.9 Should the caller request a reference number for insurance purposes, a letter can be downloaded from the Constabularies’ websites which explains that lost property is not a statutory responsibility of the Police and reports are not taken as they cannot be verified (see Appendix B). 2.10 Members of the public can also report lost property on the ‘Report My Loss’ website. Details of the lost item will be added to a Police approved, national website that can be viewed by the Police. This website is called the National Mobile Property Register (NMPR) and Police staff have access to this to allow them to search for reports of lost items. 2.11 Once the loss has been submitted, a lost property reference number is provided which can be used for insurance claims. This service can be used for almost any type of property with the exception of passports which must be reported to HM Passport Office – see Appendix A for further details. 3. Found Property 3.1 The Constabularies will only retain property reported as ‘found’ if it meets the criteria contained in this policy document; for example, there is a belief that the property may have been used in criminal
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Institute of Legal Executives Criminal Law Examiner's
    Subject 23 INSTITUTE OF LEGAL EXECUTIVES CRIMINAL LAW EXAMINER’S REPORT – AUTUMN 2007 Comments on Overall performance There were some very good responses to some of the questions, but the standard of exam performance was mixed. The issue of poor time management affected candidates performance. It was not unusual for candidates to leave too little time for the fourth question, or even not do a fourth question at all. Pleasingly, the allocation of the burden of proof (Woolmington) was rarely mistaken. There were, however, centres where all candidates failed, and where scripts contained no, or very little, relevant case law. General Advice to Candidates In your revision, learn the law AND the relevant authority AT THE SAME TIME. Let the cases guide your knowledge and understanding. It is hard work, but find time to practise writing exam question answers in timed conditions to reflect on what you can write (and how well) in a mere 45 minutes. If you then mark it yourself, a few days later, you will learn a lot about your exam technique (use these examiner’s reports too). Underline case names please. PART A Question 1 Suggested Answer (a) (i) Section 18. The actus reus should be established quickly. X has caused (the question makes this clear) really serious harm (Smith) and HIV+ was confirmed in Dica to be sufficiently serious. The mens rea is less likely though. X’s lies to Y may affect her capacity to give informed consent to sex (Dica) but are unlikely to mean he aimed for her to get HIV+.
    [Show full text]
  • San Miguel, Corsino (2019) Rethinking False Beliefs About the Law: Trust and the Epistemic Conditions of Responsibility
    San Miguel, Corsino (2019) Rethinking false beliefs about the law: trust and the epistemic conditions of responsibility. PhD thesis. http://theses.gla.ac.uk/76750/ Copyright and moral rights for this work are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge This work cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Enlighten: Theses https://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] Rethinking False Beliefs about the Law: Trust and the Epistemic Conditions of Responsibility By Corsino San Miguel Garcia (LLB) School of Law College of Social Sciences University of Glasgow A doctoral thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the award of Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) of the University of Glasgow August 2018 II III ABSTRACT The aim of this research is to address the question of how false beliefs about the law should be dealt with by the criminal law. While there has long been discontent with the current position, I argue that proposals to deal with this issue in relation to the mens rea are inadequate, and that a more consistent approach to this problem can only be developed by exploring the place of knowledge of the law as an autonomous concept from mens rea.
    [Show full text]
  • BCA Schedule
    S Legal profession S37WR S Law Law S Legal profession S34 S2 . Primary materials Study in law S34 G * This class is used only under particular jurisdictions; . Student bar associations S34 GGD e.g. English law - Primary materials - Statutes SN2 G. S34 GGM . Moots * See Auxiliary Schedule S2 for instructions. GTC . Law schools (general) H Research in law * For research in the narrow sense of searching the legal . Common subdivisions literature, see S3R D. * These conform to the order of classes 2/9 in Auxiliary * See also Jurisprudence S5A Schedule 1 but with substantial modifications of * Add to S34 H numbers 3/9 following K in K3/K9. notation. H6 . Methodology * Add to S3 numbers 2/3 in Auxiliary Schedule 1 with the additions shown at S33 Y. H6M . Models S3 . General works on the law J Lawyers, attorneys, advocates, practitioners * For works on the formal status, etc. of particular parties S33 B . Dictionaries, encyclopedias or persons in the legal profession. For works on their G . Journals, periodicals, serials practical functioning, see Practice of law S6A. * For indexing & abstracting journals, see S3WH. * Theoretically, BC2 subordinates personnel to their H . Yearbooks specific function (e.g. advocacy). But the varied nature J . Directories, law lists of the tasks undertaken & the possibilities of * Primarily for use in qualifying persons, reorganization which may alter the degree of organizations, etc. specialization of particular personnel make this hard & LR . Conference proceedings fast distinction impracticable. Most of the literature RA . Literature & the law refers to types of personnel, but this should be * Imaginative literature, etc. interpreted as covering their duties as well as their office.
    [Show full text]
  • FOI 776/11: out of Court Disposal Statistics 2010/11
    FOI 776/11: Out of Court Disposal Statistics 2010/11 Detainee Age at Count of Custody Detainee's Arrest Records Offence Title Document Disposal Gender 10 1 Arson Reprimand Male 10 1 Criminal damage to property valued under £5000 Final Warning Male 10 2 Criminal damage to property value unknown Final Warning Male 10 1 Criminal damage to property value unknown Reprimand Male 10 1 Possess an offensive weapon Reprimand Male Possess knife blade / sharp pointed article in a public place - Criminal 10 1 Justice Act 1988 Final Warning Male 10 1 Section 39 - assault by beating ( battery ) Reprimand Male 10 3 Theft - other - including theft by finding Reprimand Male 11 1 Arson Reprimand Male 11 1 Attempt robbery Final Warning Male 11 1 Common assault Reprimand Female 11 3 Common assault Reprimand Male 11 1 Criminal damage to property valued under £5000 Final Warning Male 11 2 Criminal damage to property valued under £5000 Reprimand Female 11 4 Criminal damage to property valued under £5000 Reprimand Male 11 1 Criminal damage to property value unknown Final Warning Male Possess knife blade / sharp pointed article in a public place - Criminal 11 1 Justice Act 1988 Final Warning Male Racially / religiously aggravated harassment / alarm / distress by words / 11 1 writing Reprimand Male 11 1 Section 39 - assault by beating ( battery ) Final Warning Female 11 3 Section 39 - assault by beating ( battery ) Reprimand Female 11 6 Section 39 - assault by beating ( battery ) Reprimand Male 11 1 Send letter / communication / article conveying a threatening message
    [Show full text]
  • Official Report, Finance and Constitution Committee, 5 Lockdown
    Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid) Wednesday 17 June 2020 Session 5 © Parliamentary copyright. Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body Information on the Scottish Parliament’s copyright policy can be found on the website - www.parliament.scot or by contacting Public Information on 0131 348 5000 Wednesday 17 June 2020 CONTENTS Col. FIRST MINISTER’S QUESTION TIME ..................................................................................................................... 1 Schools Reopening ...................................................................................................................................... 2 Schools Reopening ...................................................................................................................................... 7 Climate Targets .......................................................................................................................................... 10 Childcare ..................................................................................................................................................... 12 Ferry Tickets (Island Residents) ................................................................................................................. 15 People with Dementia (Lockdown) ............................................................................................................. 16 National Health Service (Restart of Services) ............................................................................................ 17 Civil Service
    [Show full text]
  • New Books in the Libraries
    Fall 2017 New BooksN in the Libraries Program Related Non-Fiction Business and Information Technology: Accounting, Business/Entrepreneurship, IT/Computer Careers Accounting: All you need to know about accounting and accountants : a student's guide to careers in accounting / Robert Louis Grottke. Hennepin Technical Library /BPC HF5625 .G76 2013 "…No matter what your motivation, [this book] offers simple, clear explanations for the principles and purpose of accounting. You'll learn what an accountant downs and why. Concepts such as auditing, financial reporting, and other accounting terms are explained clearly and succinctly, without the complicated jargon so often found in accounting textbooks. You'll also learn about the different types of accountants, the educational and licensing requirements required by the profession, and opportunities for advancement within the industry." -- Back cover. Ethics in accounting a decision-making approach / Gordon Klein Hennepin Technical Library /BPC HF5625.15 .K54 2015 "This book provides a comprehensive, authoritative, and thought-provoking examination of the ethical issues encountered by accountants working in the industry, public practice, nonprofit service, and government. …A contemporary focus immerses readers in real world ethical questions with recent trending topics such as celebrity privacy, basketball point-shaving, auditor inside trading, and online dating. Woven into chapters are tax-related issues that address fraud, cheating, confidentiality, contingent fees and auditor independence. Duties arising in more commonplace roles as internal auditors, external auditors, and tax practitioners are, of course, examined as well." -- Publisher. Fundamentals of corporate finance / Stephen A. Ross, Randolph W. Westerfield, Bradford D. Jordan. Hennepin Technical Library /BPC HG4026 .R677 2010 "The ninth edition of the market-leading Fundamentals of Corporate Finance builds on the tradition of excellence that instructors and students have come to associate with the Ross, Westerfield and Jordan series.
    [Show full text]
  • Breakdown of Offences – 06/01/21
    Breakdown of Offences – 06/01/21 Act of outraging public decency - common law 1 Affray 3 Aggravated burglary - dwelling 3 Aggravated burglary - other than dwelling 1 Aggravated burglary with intent - dwelling 1 Aggravated burglary with intent - other than dwelling 1 Aggravated vehicle taking - ( driver did not take ) vehicle and property damage under £5000 1 Allowing document to be used with intent to deceive (not otherwise coded) 1 Apply corrosive fluid with intent to burn / maim / disfigure / disable / do grievous bodily harm 1 Arrange or facilitate travel of another person with a view to exploitation 3 Arson 2 Arson - recklessly endangering life 2 Arson with intent to endanger life 3 Assault a female 13 and over by penetration with part of body / a thing - SOA 2003 1 Assault a person thereby occasioning them actual bodily harm 5 Assault by beating 8 Assault by beating of an emergency worker 6 Assault occasioning actual bodily harm 1 Assault with intent to commit robbery 2 Attempt arson with intent to endanger life 1 Attempt burglary dwelling with intent to steal 1 Attempt murder - victim aged 1 year or over 42 Attempt robbery 5 Attempt to cause grievous bodily harm with intent to do grievous bodily harm 5 Attempt to obtain money transfer by deception 1 Attempt to solicit to commit murder 1 Attempt to supply a controlled drug of Class A - Other 1 Being concerned in offer to supply controlled drug - Class A - Cocaine 2 Being concerned in producing controlled drug - Class A - Cocaine 1 Being concerned in supplying controlled drug - Class
    [Show full text]
  • Respondent's Brief
    SUPREME COURT COpy IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CAPITAL CASE Plaintiff and Respondent, S085348 v. GABRIEL CASTANEDA, Defendant and Appellant. San Bernardino County Superior Court No. FWV15543 The Honorable Mary E. Fuller, Judge RESPONDENT'S BRIEF DANE R. GILLETIE Chief Assistant Attorney General GARY W. SCHONS Senior Assistant Attorney General HOLLY WILKENS Deputy Attorney General MARVIN E. MIZELL Deputy Attorney General State Bar No. 190786 110 West A Street, Suite 1100 San Diego, CA 92101 P.O. Box 85266 San Diego, CA 92186-5266 Telephone: (619) 645-3040 Fax: (619) 645-2271 Email: [email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiff and Respondent TABLE OF CONTENTS Page STATEMENT OF THE CASE 1 GUILT PHASE STATEMENT OF FACTS 6 Prosecution Case-In-Chief 6 Events Leading Up To Castaneda's Murder Of Colleen Kennedy 6 The Morning Of Monday March 30, 1998, When Castaneda Murdered Colleen Kennedy 10 The Investigation Into The Murder Of Colleen Kennedy On March 30, 1998 13 The Autopsy On April 1, 1998 16 The Montclair Police Department Calls For Assistance From The Sheriff's Department And Other Law Enforcement Agencies To Investigate Colleen Kennedy's Murder In April 1998 19 After More Investigation, Castaneda Is Arrested In May 1998 For Murdering Colleen Kennedy 20 Further Evidence Of Castaneda's Guilt After May 1998 25 Defense 26 Prosecution Rebuttal 28 PENALTY PHASE STATEMENT OF FACTS 29 Defense 29 Psychological And Family History Evidence 29 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Page Testimony
    [Show full text]
  • LAW of THEFT Theft Act 1968 Theft Defined in S1 of the Act Some
    LECTURES 10-11: LAW OF THEFT SOURCE OF THE LAW: Theft Act 1968 ʹ theft defined in s1 of the Act Some General Comments on the Act The late1960s was a period of great reform (abortion Act, the Act that decriminalised homosexuality). The Theft Act was part of that reform. Not as controversial as othersbut made far reaching reforms. Before the theft Act the main offence was one of larceny. This goes back to the medieval period and was an extremely complicated area of law. Criminal reform body looked at it in the 60s and concluded that they should simply scrap the whole thing and start again. That͛s basically what the theft act aimed to do. So for students, you don͛t need to know anything about the law before 1968 besides the fact that it existed and was a mess. STRUCTURE OF THE ACT; Definition: s1 S2-6: Group of 5 sections which give explanatory provisions for the elements of theft. Elements of theft; Actus Reus ͚Appropriation ͚ (s.3) ͚Property͛ (s.4) ͚Belonging to Another͛ (s.5) Mens Rea Dishonesty (s.2) Intention to permanently deprive the other of the property (s.6) Maximum penalty for theft is set out in s.7 and is 7 years for stealing. It is of course reserves for the worst cases and a great many thefts aren͛t even likely to result in prison sentences. The tendency has been to interpret each of the sections widely such that theft has become a very broad crime. This has happened particularly with the element of appropriation.
    [Show full text]
  • Actio Furti (27 BCE~235 CE)
    Between the Spheres of F u r t u m The Development of Theft from Private to Public by Matthew G. Mchale A thesis presented for the B.A. degree With Honors in The Department of Classical Studies University of Michigan Summer of 2012 © Matthew G. Mchale July, 2012 II “Cognitationis poenam nemo patitur.” – Ulpianus, Digesta, 48. 19. 18 “No one is punished for thinking.” – Ulpian, Digest, 48. 19. 18 III To Jessica I dedicate this thesis. You are the moon of my life, For this, I will always adore you. IV Acknowledgements To Professor Bruce W. Frier, who first introduced me to Roman law in fall of my junior year and who has advised me in all facets of my thesis, I humbly and sincerely extend my deepest gratitude for all of his wisdom and guidance during the construction of this paper. I must also express my appreciation for Professor Celia Schultz who, despite having been asked at the last minute, stood as my second reader and offered me wonderful counsel. Although I restructured the entire chapter I wrote in Dr. Netta Berlin’s thesis writing course, I would be at a loss without her encouragement and guidance. And I give my thanks to all the other professors who have by political, architectural, or literary means shaped my view of Roman history. To the Department of Classics for permitting me access to the immeasurable wealth of the Library and allowing me the opportunity to pursue a thesis I am indebted. I would be lost without Alexander Hermann’s pointed criticisms and useful insights; and I thank him for all the time he spent helping me develop ideas and telling this story.
    [Show full text]
  • Home Office Counting Rules for Fraud
    Home Office Counting Rules For Recorded Crime With effect from April 2021 Fraud Historic Fraud Offences In January 2007 the Fraud Act 2006 became law and repealed much of the previous fraud legislation. Whilst it is not possible to prosecute offenders under the new legislation for offences committed before the new act became law, the Home Office require the National Fraud Intelligence Bureau via Action Fraud to record fraud for statistical purposes, under the new legislation. Action Fraud Action Fraud is the name of the contact centre that records NFIB fraud and some cyber-enabled and cyber- dependent crimes such as Computer Misuse Act offences like hacking (Cyber Crime). Action Fraud does this through its’ contact centre and on-line reporting tool. The NFIB codes used in this section are used by Action Fraud to enable them to record specific fraud/cyber crime types reported to them that are then passed to the NFIB. These codes are also used to count fraud/cyber types passed to the NFIB in bulk data transfers from other data providers working in partnership with the NFIB, such as those in the banking and credit industry. All confirmed fraud/cyber crimes held within the NFIB database will use the NFIB codes. Action Fraud can only record NFIB fraud and cyber crimes. Where other notifiable offences are apparent the victim will be referred to the police. Likewise, non-NFIB recorded frauds and cyber enabled offences remain the responsibility of the police to record (i.e Other Fraud and Forgery or blackmail offences committed through social media/chatrooms etc).
    [Show full text]
  • HBG USA Fall 2021 - Page 1
    GRAND CENTRAL PUBLISHING The Antisocial Network The GameStop Short Squeeze and the Ragtag Group of Amateur Traders That Brought Wall Street to Its Knees Ben Mezrich Summary The definitive account of the story of the year, the can’t-make-this-up Gamestop short squeeze—a David vs. Goliath tale of fortunes won and lost overnight that changed Wall Street forever. In The Antisocial Network, bestselling author Ben Mezrich tells the true story of the subreddit WallStreetBets, a loosely affiliated group of private investors and internet trolls who took down one of the biggest hedge funds on Wall Street, and in so doing, fired the first shot in a revolution that threatens to upend the financial establishment. Told with deep access, from multiple angles, it examines the culmination of a populist movement that began with the intersection of social media and the growth of simplified, democratizing financial Grand Central Publishing portals—represented by the biggest upstart in the business, RobinHood, and its millions of mostly millennial 9781538707555 Pub Date: 9/7/21 devotees. $28.00 USD/$35.00 CAD Hardcover The unlikely focus of the battle: GameStop, a flailing brick and mortar dinosaur catering to teenagers and 288 Pages outsiders, that had somehow outlived forbearers like Blockbuster Video and Petsmart as the world rapidly Carton Qty: 20 moved online. The story comes to a ... Print Run: 75K Business & Economics / Consumer Behavior Contributor Bio BUS016000 Ben Mezrich is the New York Times bestselling author of The Accidental Billionaires (adapted by Aaron Sorkin 9 in H | 6 in W into the David Fincher film The Social Network) and Bringing Down the House (adapted into the #1 box office hit film 21), as well as many other bestselling books.
    [Show full text]