DOCSLIB.ORG

FOI 776/11: out of Court Disposal Statistics 2010/11

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FOI 776/11: out of Court Disposal Statistics 2010/11 FOI 776/11: Out of Court Disposal Statistics 2010/11 Detainee Age at Count of Custody Detainee's Arrest Records Offence Title Document Disposal Gender 10 1 Arson Reprimand Male 10 1 Criminal damage to property valued under £5000 Final Warning Male 10 2 Criminal damage to property value unknown Final Warning Male 10 1 Criminal damage to property value unknown Reprimand Male 10 1 Possess an offensive weapon Reprimand Male Possess knife blade / sharp pointed article in a public place - Criminal 10 1 Justice Act 1988 Final Warning Male 10 1 Section 39 - assault by beating ( battery ) Reprimand Male 10 3 Theft - other - including theft by finding Reprimand Male 11 1 Arson Reprimand Male 11 1 Attempt robbery Final Warning Male 11 1 Common assault Reprimand Female 11 3 Common assault Reprimand Male 11 1 Criminal damage to property valued under £5000 Final Warning Male 11 2 Criminal damage to property valued under £5000 Reprimand Female 11 4 Criminal damage to property valued under £5000 Reprimand Male 11 1 Criminal damage to property value unknown Final Warning Male Possess knife blade / sharp pointed article in a public place - Criminal 11 1 Justice Act 1988 Final Warning Male Racially / religiously aggravated harassment / alarm / distress by words / 11 1 writing Reprimand Male 11 1 Section 39 - assault by beating ( battery ) Final Warning Female 11 3 Section 39 - assault by beating ( battery ) Reprimand Female 11 6 Section 39 - assault by beating ( battery ) Reprimand Male 11 1 Send letter / communication / article conveying a threatening message Reprimand Male Send letter / communication / article conveying indecent / offensive 11 1 message Reprimand Male 11 2 Theft from shop Final Warning Female 11 2 Theft from shop - shoplifting Reprimand Female 11 1 Theft from shop - shoplifting Reprimand Male 11 1 Theft - other - including theft by finding Final Warning Male 11 2 Theft - other - including theft by finding Reprimand Male 11 1 Use threatening words / behaviour to cause harassment alarm or distress Conditional Caution Male 11 2 Use threatening words / behaviour to cause harassment alarm or distress Reprimand Female 11 1 Use threatening words / behaviour to cause harassment alarm or distress Reprimand Male 12 1 Arson Reprimand Male 12 1 Assault a constable in the execution of his / her duty Final Warning Female 12 1 Assist / undertake to retain / remove / dispose etc - stolen goods Final Warning Male 12 1 Attempt robbery Final Warning Male 12 2 Burglary dwelling and theft - no violence Final Warning Male 12 1 Burglary other than dwelling - with intent to commit damage Reprimand Male 12 1 Common assault Final Warning Female 12 2 Common assault Final Warning Male 12 2 Common assault Reprimand Female 12 2 Common assault Reprimand Male 12 1 Criminal damage to property valued under £5000 Final Warning Female 12 5 Criminal damage to property valued under £5000 Final Warning Male 12 7 Criminal damage to property valued under £5000 Reprimand Male 12 2 Criminal damage to property - value over £5000 Reprimand Male 12 1 Criminal damage to property value unknown Final Warning Male 12 1 Criminal damage to property value unknown Reprimand Male 12 1 Possess article with blade / sharply pointed article on school premises Reprimand Male Possess knife blade / sharp pointed article in a public place - Criminal 12 1 Justice Act 1988 Final Warning Male Possess knife blade / sharp pointed article in a public place - Criminal 12 1 Justice Act 1988 Reprimand Female 12 3 Section 39 - assault by beating ( battery ) Final Warning Female 12 1 Section 39 - assault by beating ( battery ) Final Warning Male 12 3 Section 39 - assault by beating ( battery ) Reprimand Female 12 12 Section 39 - assault by beating ( battery ) Reprimand Male 12 1 Section 4 words / behaviour - fear unlawful violence Final Warning Female 12 1 Section 4 words / behaviour - fear unlawful violence Final Warning Male 12 1 Section 4 words / behaviour - fear unlawful violence Reprimand Male Send letter / communication / article conveying indecent / offensive 12 1 message Reprimand Male 12 1 Theft from shop Final Warning Male 12 8 Theft from shop Reprimand Female 12 3 Theft from shop Reprimand Male 12 1 Theft from shop - shoplifting Final Warning Male 12 1 Theft from the person of another Reprimand Female 12 1 Theft - other - including theft by finding Final Warning Female 12 1 Theft - other - including theft by finding Final Warning Male 12 1 Theft - other - including theft by finding Reprimand Female 12 3 Theft - other - including theft by finding Reprimand Male 12 1 Threat to damage / destroy property Reprimand Female 12 1 Use threatening words / behaviour to cause harassment alarm or distress Final Warning Male 12 1 Use threatening words / behaviour to cause harassment alarm or distress Reprimand Male 13 2 Assault a constable in the execution of his / her duty Final Warning Female 13 1 Assault a constable in the execution of his / her duty Reprimand Female 13 1 Assault designated / accredited person - Police Reform Act 2002 Final Warning Female 13 1 Assault occasioning actual bodily harm Final Warning Male 13 1 Attempt theft from shop Final Warning Male 13 5 Burglary dwelling and theft - no violence Final Warning Male 13 1 Burglary dwelling and theft - no violence Reprimand Male 13 1 Carried in / on a motor vehicle taken without the owners consent Reprimand Male 13 2 Common assault Final Warning Female 13 6 Common assault Reprimand Female 13 4 Common assault Reprimand Male 13 2 Criminal damage to property valued under £5000 Final Warning Female 13 4 Criminal damage to property valued under £5000 Final Warning Male 13 3 Criminal damage to property valued under £5000 Reprimand Female 13 5 Criminal damage to property valued under £5000 Reprimand Male 13 1 Criminal damage to property value unknown Final Warning Female 13 2 Criminal damage to property value unknown Final Warning Male 13 1 Criminal damage to property value unknown Reprimand Female 13 4 Criminal damage to property value unknown Reprimand Male 13 1 Drunk and disorderly in a public place Final Warning Female 13 1 Firearm - possession with intent to cause fear of violence Reprimand Male 13 1 Handling stolen goods - arranging to receive Reprimand Male 13 1 Harassment without violence Reprimand Female 13 1 Obstruct / resist a constable in execution of duty Simple Caution Male Offender under 18 engage in non penetrative sexual activity with a boy 13 1 under 13 - SOA 2003 Final Warning Male Offender under 18 engage in non penetrative sexual activity with a girl 13 1 under 13 - SOA 2003 Final Warning Male Offender under 18 engage in non penetrative sexual activity with a girl 13 1 under 13 - SOA 2003 Reprimand Male Offender under 18 sexual activity with a girl under 13 family member - no 13 1 penetration - SOA 2003 Final Warning Male 13 1 Possess a class B controlled drug - other Reprimand Male 13 2 Possess a controlled drug of Class B - Cannabis / Cannabis Resin Final Warning Male 13 2 Possess a controlled drug of Class B - Cannabis / Cannabis Resin Reprimand Male 13 1 Possess an offensive weapon Reprimand Male Racially / religiously aggravated intentional harassment / alarm / distress - 13 1 words / writing Reprimand Male 13 8 Section 39 - assault by beating ( battery ) Final Warning Female 13 5 Section 39 - assault by beating ( battery ) Final Warning Male 13 10 Section 39 - assault by beating ( battery ) Reprimand Female 13 12 Section 39 - assault by beating ( battery ) Reprimand Male 13 4 Section 47 - assault occasioning actual bodily harm Final Warning Male 13 1 Section 47 - assault occasioning actual bodily harm Reprimand Male 13 2 Section 4 words / behaviour - fear unlawful violence Reprimand Male 13 1 Theft from motor vehicle Reprimand Male 13 1 Theft from shop Final Warning Female 13 15 Theft from shop Reprimand Female 13 6 Theft from shop Reprimand Male 13 1 Theft from shop Simple Caution Male 13 1 Theft from shop - shoplifting Reprimand Female 13 2 Theft from shop - shoplifting Reprimand Male 13 1 Theft - other - including theft by finding Final Warning Female 13 2 Theft - other - including theft by finding Final Warning Male 13 2 Theft - other - including theft by finding Reprimand Female 13 9 Theft - other - including theft by finding Reprimand Male 13 3 Use threatening words / behaviour to cause harassment alarm or distress Reprimand Female 13 3 Use threatening words / behaviour to cause harassment alarm or distress Reprimand Male 14 1 Arson Final Warning Female 14 1 Arson Final Warning Male 14 1 Assault a constable in the execution of his / her duty Reprimand Female 14 1 Assault occasioning actual bodily harm Final Warning Female 14 3 Burglary dwelling and theft - no violence Final Warning Male 14 1 Burglary dwelling - with intent to steal Reprimand Female 14 1 Burglary other than dwelling - theft Final Warning Male 14 3 Burglary other than dwelling - theft Reprimand Male 14 3 Common assault Final Warning Female 14 5 Common assault Final Warning Male 14 6 Common assault Reprimand Female 14 5 Common assault Reprimand Male 14 1 Criminal damage to property valued under £5000 Final Warning Female 14 10 Criminal damage to property valued under £5000 Final Warning Male 14 7 Criminal damage to property valued under £5000 Reprimand Female 14 12 Criminal damage to property valued under £5000 Reprimand Male 14 4 Criminal damage to property value unknown Final Warning Male 14 3 Criminal damage to property value unknown Reprimand Female 14 3 Criminal damage to property value unknown Reprimand Male 14 4 Drunk and disorderly
Load more

Recommended publications
  • RE-VISITING the FRAUD ACT 2006 – a STEP TOO FAR? Hannah Willcocks
    RE-VISITING THE FRAUD ACT 2006 – A STEP TOO FAR? Hannah Willcocks Brought into force on 15th January 2007,1 the Fraud Act 2006 (‘the Act’) has now been part of the criminal law of England and Wales for over 12 years. Through the introduction of a new general offence of fraud, its aim was to improve the law by making it: a. more comprehensible to juries, especially in serious fraud trials; b. a useful tool in effective prosecutions; c. simpler and therefore fairer; and d. more flexible so able to encompass all forms of fraud 2 and “deal with developing technology”.3 Following the Act’s implementation, it has generally4 been accepted5 that the Act has managed to overcome the vast majority of the difficulties previously encountered with the old offences of deception.6 In 2012, in its Post-Legislative Assessment of the Fraud Act 2006, the Ministry of Justice (‘MoJ’) concluded that the aims and objectives of the 1 The Fraud Act 2006 (Commencement) Order 2006 (SI 2006/3200). 2 Law Commission, Fraud (Law Com No 276, Cm 5560, 2002), para 1.6. 3 Home Office, Fraud Law Reform: Consultation on Proposals for Legislation (2004) p. 5. 4 For a contrary view see Anthony Arlidge QC, Jonathan Fisher QC, Alexander Milne QC and Polly Sprenger, Arlidge and Parry on Fraud (5th edn, Sweet & Maxwell 2016) 44, para 3-005. 5 See e.g. Simester and Sullivan’s Criminal Law, Theory and Doctrine (5th edn, Hart Publishing Ltd 2013) 610; Andrew Ashworth & Jeremy Horder, Principles of Criminal Law (7th edn, Oxford University Press 2013) 405; Carol Withey ‘The Fraud Act 2006 – some early observations and comparisons with the former law’ (2007) 71(3) Journal of Criminal Law, 220 – 237, 228 – 236; Nicholas Yeo, ‘Bull’s-Eye’, 157 NLJ 212 & 418.
    [Show full text]
  • Think Box 13.5
    Loveless, Allen, and Derry: Complete Criminal Law 7e, Chapter 13 Thinking Point 13.1 Has D committed fraud by false representation under s2 Fraud Act 2006? An auction house sells a painting by Picasso, believing it to be genuine. It turns out to be a forgery. Do they have MR for s2? Answer guidance 1. AR: False representation MR: Knowledge that the representation is false, dishonesty and intention to make a gain/loss/risk loss to another. Any auction house will always harbour a suspicion about the authenticity of art. They will therefore know that their representation might be false. But in the absence of dishonesty, assessed objectively (Ivey) they will lack MR. Thinking Point 13.2 D applies for foreign travel insurance for a forthcoming holiday and deliberately fails to disclose a recent operation involving major surgery. Whilst on holiday, her condition deteriorates and she requires expensive medical treatment. She submits a claim for this under the insurance policy. Has she committed fraud under s3? Answer guidance Yes. Any type of insurance contract is one of ‘utmost good faith’ and D will have both a contractual and also a criminal duty to disclose relevant information. The presence of dishonesty and intent to make a gain/cause loss/expose another to risk of loss will secure conviction under s1. Dishonesty is assessed objectively. Thinking Point 13.3 Has D committed fraud under s4? 1. D, a Citizen’s Advice Bureau adviser, professing to offer free advice and assistance, obtains compensation of £5000 on behalf of an elderly client for whom she had taken legal proceedings.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Law Fraud Liability to Account for It to the Owner
    FRAUD FACTS Issue 17 March 2014 (3rd edition) INFORMATION FOR ORGANISATIONS Fraud in Scotland Fraud does not respect boundaries. Fraudsters use the same tactics and deceptions, and cause the same harm throughout the UK. However, the way in which the crimes are defined, investigated and prosecuted can depend on whether the fraud took place in Scotland or England and Wales. Therefore it is important for Scottish and UK-wide businesses to understand the differences that exist. What is a ‘Scottish fraud’? Embezzlement Overview of enforcement Embezzlement is the felonious appropriation This factsheet focuses on criminal fraud. There are many interested parties involved in of property without the consent of the owner In Scotland criminal fraud is mainly dealt the detection, investigation and prosecution with under the common law and a number where the appropriation is by a person who of statutory offences. The main fraud offences has received a limited ownership of the of fraud in Scotland, including: in Scotland are: property, subject to restoration at a future • Police Service of Scotland time, or possession of property subject to • common law fraud liability to account for it to the owner. • Financial Conduct Authority • uttering There is an element of breach of trust in • Trading Standards • embezzlement embezzlement making it more serious than • Department for Work and Pensions • statutory frauds. simple theft. In most cases embezzlement involves the appropriation of money. • Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service. It is important to note that the Fraud Act 2006 does not apply in Scotland (apart from Statutory frauds s10(1) which increases the maximum In addition there are a wide range of statutory Investigating fraud custodial sentence for fraudulent trading to offences which are closely related to the 10 years).
    [Show full text]
  • Institute of Legal Executives Criminal Law Examiner's
    Subject 23 INSTITUTE OF LEGAL EXECUTIVES CRIMINAL LAW EXAMINER’S REPORT – AUTUMN 2007 Comments on Overall performance There were some very good responses to some of the questions, but the standard of exam performance was mixed. The issue of poor time management affected candidates performance. It was not unusual for candidates to leave too little time for the fourth question, or even not do a fourth question at all. Pleasingly, the allocation of the burden of proof (Woolmington) was rarely mistaken. There were, however, centres where all candidates failed, and where scripts contained no, or very little, relevant case law. General Advice to Candidates In your revision, learn the law AND the relevant authority AT THE SAME TIME. Let the cases guide your knowledge and understanding. It is hard work, but find time to practise writing exam question answers in timed conditions to reflect on what you can write (and how well) in a mere 45 minutes. If you then mark it yourself, a few days later, you will learn a lot about your exam technique (use these examiner’s reports too). Underline case names please. PART A Question 1 Suggested Answer (a) (i) Section 18. The actus reus should be established quickly. X has caused (the question makes this clear) really serious harm (Smith) and HIV+ was confirmed in Dica to be sufficiently serious. The mens rea is less likely though. X’s lies to Y may affect her capacity to give informed consent to sex (Dica) but are unlikely to mean he aimed for her to get HIV+.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Ite Offences Against the Person
    OFFENCES AGAINST THE PERSON ’ITE OFFENCES AGAINST THE PERSON ACT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS 1. short title. Homicide 2. Capitall murders. 3. Sentence of death. Sentence of death not to be passed on pregnant mmm. Procedure where woman convicted of capital offence alleges she is pregnant. 3~.Life imprisonment for non-capital murder. 3~.Provisions as to procedure and regarding repulted and multiple murders. 3c. Proyisions as to appeab in relation to repeated and multiple murders. 3~.Provisions as to procedure regarding two or more murders tried together. 4. Abolition of ‘‘ms~~emalice’’. 5. Persons suffering from diminished responsibility. 6. Provocation. 7. suicide pact. 8. Conspiring or soliciting to commit murder. 9. Manslaughter. 10. Exasable homicide. 11. Petit tnasm. 12. Provision for trial of certain cases of murder or manslaryhtcr. Attempts to Murder 13. Administering poison, or wounding with intent to murder. 14. Destroying or damaging building with intent to murder. 15. Setting 6re to ship, etc., with intent to murder. 16. Attempting to administer poison, etc.. with intent to murder. 17. By other means attempting to commit murder. htters Threatening to Murder 18. Letters threatening to murder. [The inclusion of thiu page is authorized by L.N. 42/1995] OFFENCES A CAINST THE PERSON Acts Causing or Tending to Cause Donger to rife, or Bodily Harm 19. Preventing person endeavouring to save his life in shipwreck. 20. Shooting or attempting to shoot or wounding with intent to do grievous bodily harm. 21. What shall be deemed loaded arms. 22. Unlawful wounding. 23. Attempting to choke, etc., in order to commit indictable offence.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 8 Criminal Conduct Offences
    Chapter 8 Criminal conduct offences Page Index 1-8-1 Introduction 1-8-2 Chapter structure 1-8-2 Transitional guidance 1-8-2 Criminal conduct - section 42 – Armed Forces Act 2006 1-8-5 Violence offences 1-8-6 Common assault and battery - section 39 Criminal Justice Act 1988 1-8-6 Assault occasioning actual bodily harm - section 47 Offences against the Persons Act 1861 1-8-11 Possession in public place of offensive weapon - section 1 Prevention of Crime Act 1953 1-8-15 Possession in public place of point or blade - section 139 Criminal Justice Act 1988 1-8-17 Dishonesty offences 1-8-20 Theft - section 1 Theft Act 1968 1-8-20 Taking a motor vehicle or other conveyance without authority - section 12 Theft Act 1968 1-8-25 Making off without payment - section 3 Theft Act 1978 1-8-29 Abstraction of electricity - section 13 Theft Act 1968 1-8-31 Dishonestly obtaining electronic communications services – section 125 Communications Act 2003 1-8-32 Possession or supply of apparatus which may be used for obtaining an electronic communications service - section 126 Communications Act 2003 1-8-34 Fraud - section 1 Fraud Act 2006 1-8-37 Dishonestly obtaining services - section 11 Fraud Act 2006 1-8-41 Miscellaneous offences 1-8-44 Unlawful possession of a controlled drug - section 5 Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 1-8-44 Criminal damage - section 1 Criminal Damage Act 1971 1-8-47 Interference with vehicles - section 9 Criminal Attempts Act 1981 1-8-51 Road traffic offences 1-8-53 Careless and inconsiderate driving - section 3 Road Traffic Act 1988 1-8-53 Driving
    [Show full text]
  • Dr Stephen Copp and Alison Cronin, 'The Failure of Criminal Law To
    Dr Stephen Copp and Alison Cronin, ‘The Failure of Criminal Law to Control the Use of Off Balance Sheet Finance During the Banking Crisis’ (2015) 36 The Company Lawyer, Issue 4, 99, reproduced with permission of Thomson Reuters (Professional) UK Ltd. This extract is taken from the author’s original manuscript and has not been edited. The definitive, published, version of record is available here: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=i0ad8289e0000014eca3cbb3f02 6cd4c4&docguid=I83C7BE20C70F11E48380F725F1B325FB&hitguid=I83C7BE20C70F11 E48380F725F1B325FB&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=25&crumb- action=append&context=6&resolvein=true THE FAILURE OF CRIMINAL LAW TO CONTROL THE USE OF OFF BALANCE SHEET FINANCE DURING THE BANKING CRISIS Dr Stephen Copp & Alison Cronin1 30th May 2014 Introduction A fundamental flaw at the heart of the corporate structure is the scope for fraud based on the provision of misinformation to investors, actual or potential. The scope for fraud arises because the separation of ownership and control in the company facilitates asymmetric information2 in two key circumstances: when a company seeks to raise capital from outside investors and when a company provides information to its owners for stewardship purposes.3 Corporate misinformation, such as the use of off balance sheet finance (OBSF), can distort the allocation of investment funding so that money gets attracted into less well performing enterprises (which may be highly geared and more risky, enhancing the risk of multiple failures). Insofar as it creates a market for lemons it risks damaging confidence in the stock markets themselves since the essence of a market for lemons is that bad drives out good from the market, since sellers of the good have less incentive to sell than sellers of the bad.4 The neo-classical model of perfect competition assumes that there will be perfect information.
    [Show full text]
  • You Never Saw a Fish on the Wall with Its Mouth Shut
    IAN WINTER QC YOU NEVER SAW A FISH ON THE WALL WITH ITS MOUTH SHUT THE PRIVILEGE AGAINST SELF-INCRIMINATION AND THE DECISION OF THE COURT OF APPEAL IN R V K [2009] EWCA CRIM 1640 ISSUE NINE WINTER 2009 PUBLISHED BY CLOTH FAIR CHAMBERS CLOTH FAIR CHAMBERS Nicholas Purnell QC Richard Horwell QC John Kelsey-Fry QC Timothy Langdale QC Ian Winter QC Jonathan Barnard Clare Sibson Cloth Fair Chambers specialises in fraud and commercial crime, complex and organised crime, regulatory and disciplinary matters, defamation and in broader litigation areas where specialist advocacy and advisory skills are required. 2 CLOTH FAIR CHAMBERS IAN WINTER QC YOU NEVER SAW A FISH ON THE WALL WITH ITS MOUTH SHUT1 THE PRIVILEGE AGAINST SELF-INCRIMINATION AND THE DECISION OF THE COURT OF APPEAL IN R V K [2009] EWCA CRIM 1640 ISSUE NINE WINTER 2009 PUBLISHED BY CLOTH FAIR CHAMBERS 1 Unreliably attributed to Sally Berger but the true origin is unclear. King John, pressured by the barons and threatened with insurrection, reluctantly signs the great charter on the Thames island of Runnymede CLOTH FAIR CHAMBERS he fish on the wall has its mouth open unreliable testimony produced as a result of it. because it couldn’t resist the temptation to open it when the occasion appeared to Had paragraph 38 of Magna Carta remained the law, which justify doing so. There are few convicted could have been the case even once the use of torture had defendants who likewise could resist the been outlawed2, the question over the admissibility of the temptation to open their mouths and accused’s statement would not have been whether the Tthereby assist their prosecutors with their own words.
    [Show full text]
  • San Miguel, Corsino (2019) Rethinking False Beliefs About the Law: Trust and the Epistemic Conditions of Responsibility
    San Miguel, Corsino (2019) Rethinking false beliefs about the law: trust and the epistemic conditions of responsibility. PhD thesis. http://theses.gla.ac.uk/76750/ Copyright and moral rights for this work are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge This work cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Enlighten: Theses https://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] Rethinking False Beliefs about the Law: Trust and the Epistemic Conditions of Responsibility By Corsino San Miguel Garcia (LLB) School of Law College of Social Sciences University of Glasgow A doctoral thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the award of Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) of the University of Glasgow August 2018 II III ABSTRACT The aim of this research is to address the question of how false beliefs about the law should be dealt with by the criminal law. While there has long been discontent with the current position, I argue that proposals to deal with this issue in relation to the mens rea are inadequate, and that a more consistent approach to this problem can only be developed by exploring the place of knowledge of the law as an autonomous concept from mens rea.
    [Show full text]
  • Fraud, Bribery and Money Laundering Offences: Definitive Guideline
    Fraud, Bribery and Money Laundering GUIDELINE DEFINITIVE Offences Definitive Guideline Fraud, Bribery and Money Laundering Offences Definitive Guideline 1 Contents Applicability of guideline 4 Fraud 5 Fraud by false representation, fraud by failing to disclose information, fraud by abuse of position Fraud Act 2006 (section 1) Conspiracy to defraud Common law False accounting Theft Act 1968 (section 17) Possessing, making or supplying articles for use in fraud 13 Possession of articles for use in frauds Fraud Act 2006 (section 6) Making or supplying articles for use in frauds Fraud Act 2006 (section 7) Revenue fraud 19 Fraud Conspiracy to defraud (common law) Fraud Act 2006 (section 1) False accounting Theft Act 1968 (section 17) Fraudulent evasion of VAT; False statement for VAT purposes; Conduct amounting to an offence Value Added Tax Act 1994 (section 72) Effective from 1 October 2014 2 Fraud, Bribery and Money Laundering Offences Definitive Guideline Fraudulent evasion of income tax Taxes Management Act 1970 (section 106A) Fraudulent evasion of excise duty; Improper importation of goods Customs and Excise Management Act 1979 (sections 50, 170 and 170B) Fraud Cheat the public revenue (common law) Benefit fraud 27 Dishonest representations for obtaining benefit etc Social Security Administration Act 1992 (section 111A) Tax Credit fraud Tax Credits Act 2002 (section 35) False accounting Theft Act 1968 (section 17) False representations for obtaining benefit etc Social Security Administration Act 1992 (section 112) Fraud by false representation,
    [Show full text]
  • False Id Guidance
    FALSE ID GUIDANCE July 2012 CONTENTS 1. Ministerial Foreword .........................................................................................................................................................4 2. Introduction .........................................................................................................................................................................5 Who this guidance is for .....................................................................................................................................................5 Glossary.................................................................................................................................................................................5 Background to the problem ...............................................................................................................................................6 3. The law regarding false ID .............................................................................................................................................7 Types of false ID .................................................................................................................................................................7 Identity Documents Act 2010 ...........................................................................................................................................7 Fraud Act 2006 ....................................................................................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Spouse - Witnesses
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. LAW REFORM COMMISSIONER Report No.6 SPOUSE - WITNESSES (Competence and Compellability) MELBOURNE 1976 LAW REFORM COMMISSIONER Report No.6 NCJRS MAY 291979 ;;Ii ACQUISITiONS SPOUSE - WITNESSES (Competence and Compellability) MELBOURNE 1976 PREFACE 1. By letter dated the 6th February 1974 the Honourable the Attorney­ General, acting under Section 8 (b) of the Law Reform Act 1973, referred to the Law Reform Commissioner, for investigation and report, the matter of the procedural law, civil and criminal. 2. Pursuant to this general reference the following Working Papers have been circulated and the following Reports submitted: Criminal Procedure Working Paper No. 1 (Miscellaneous Reforms) Report No.2 Delays in SUllreme Court Actions Working Paper No.3 Report No.4 3. The present Report is submitted in further implementation of the general reference of 6th February 1974. 4. It is desired to acknowledge the assistance received from the members of the Law Reform Advisory Council and from Mrs. J. P. Palmer (Legal Assistant to the Commissioner) and Miss E. L. Russell (Secretary to the Commissioner) in the preparation of this Report. 3 CONTENTS Paragraph Page Sec. 1 Introduction. 1 7 Sec. 2 Civil Proceedings. 3 8 Sec. 3 Criminal Proceedings. 8 Sub-sec. 1 The Common Law Rules. 5 8 Sub-sec. 2 English Statutes Relaxing Restrictions. 12 10 Sub-sec. 3 Victorian Stalutes Relaxing Restrictions. 17 12 Sub-sec. 4 The Position Now in Victoria. 29 17 . Sec. 4 Policy Considerations. 32 19 Sec. 5 Should the Competence of Spouse-Witnesses be Restricted? 39 20 Sec.
    [Show full text]