DOCSLIB.ORG

The Nrgsuite Guide

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Nrgsuite Guide The NRGsuite Guide Written by Francis Gaudreault Last edited on May 22, 2015 Table of Contents 1. The NRGsuite .................................................................................................................................................................. 4 1.1. Getting started ................................................................................................................................................... 5 1.2. Installing the NRGsuite ................................................................................................................................... 6 1.2.1. Installing the NRGsuite on your hard drive ........................................................................................ 6 1.2.2. Installing the NRGsuite in PyMOL .......................................................................................................... 6 1.3. The project environment ............................................................................................................................... 8 1.3.1. The hierarchy of a project .......................................................................................................................... 9 1.3.2. Creating a new project ............................................................................................................................. 11 1.3.3. Loading an existing project .................................................................................................................... 12 1.3.3. The example project .................................................................................................................................. 13 1.4. Working with the FlexAID and GetCleft interfaces .......................................................................... 14 1.5. The object/selection widget ...................................................................................................................... 15 1.6. The Wizards ...................................................................................................................................................... 16 1.7. The Validators .................................................................................................................................................. 17 1.8. The Preferences ............................................................................................................................................... 18 1.9. The About ........................................................................................................................................................... 19 2. The FlexAID interface .............................................................................................................................................. 20 2.1. Getting started ................................................................................................................................................. 21 2.2. Working with sessions ................................................................................................................................. 22 2.2.1. Saving a session ........................................................................................................................................... 23 2.2.2. Loading an existing session .................................................................................................................... 24 2.3. The Input Files tab .......................................................................................................................................... 25 2.3.1. Importing the molecules .......................................................................................................................... 26 2.3.1.1. Importing the target ...................................................................................................................................... 27 2.3.1.2. Importing the ligand ..................................................................................................................................... 28 2.3.2. Displaying the molecules ......................................................................................................................... 32 2.3.3. Resetting the molecules ........................................................................................................................... 33 2.3.4. Processing the molecules ......................................................................................................................... 34 2.3.5. Generating a 3D conformation of the ligand .................................................................................. 35 2.3.6. Changing the anchor atom of the ligand .......................................................................................... 36 2.4. The Target Config tab .................................................................................................................................... 37 2.4.1. Defining the binding-site of the target .............................................................................................. 38 2.4.1.1. Defining the binding-site using a sphere ............................................................................................. 39 2.4.1.2. Defining the binding-site using clefts .................................................................................................... 42 2.4.1.3. Pre-configured binding-sites ..................................................................................................................... 45 2.4.2. Introducing flexibility in the target .................................................................................................... 46 2.4.2.1. Adding a side-chain from the PyMOL viewer ..................................................................................... 47 2.4.2.2. Adding a side-chain by its residue code ............................................................................................... 50 2.4.2.3. Pre-configured target flexibility .............................................................................................................. 51 2.5. The Ligand Config tab ................................................................................................................................... 52 2.5.1. Including degrees of freedom for the ligand ................................................................................... 53 2.5.1.1. Including ligand translation and rotation ............................................................................................ 54 2.5.1.2. Including ligand flexibility .......................................................................................................................... 55 2.5.2. Using the ligand as reference ................................................................................................................ 57 2.5.3. Adding constraints ..................................................................................................................................... 58 2.6. The Scoring Config tab .................................................................................................................................. 62 2.6.1. Including the heteroatoms of the target .......................................................................................... 63 2.6.2. Adjusting the soft-docking properties ............................................................................................... 64 2.6.3. Adjusting the properties of the solvent ............................................................................................. 65 2.6.4. Changing the resolution of docking .................................................................................................... 66 2.6.5. Changing the sampling of rotamers ................................................................................................... 67 2.7. The Genetic Algorithm Params tab ......................................................................................................... 68 2 2.7.1. Adjusting the number of energy evaluations .................................................................................. 69 2.7.2. Adjusting the genetic operators ........................................................................................................... 70 2.7.3. Adjusting the PyMOL visual display of real-time docking ........................................................ 71 2.7.4. Changing the fitness model .................................................................................................................... 72 2.7.5. Changing the reproduction model ...................................................................................................... 73 2.8. The Simulate tab ............................................................................................................................................. 74 2.8.1. Executing a docking simulation ........................................................................................................... 75 2.8.1.1. Controlling a docking simulation ............................................................................................................ 75 2.8.1.2. Continuing a docking simulation ............................................................................................................. 76 2.8.1.3. Viewing docking in real-time ...................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Educational Priorities Panel Capital Promises
    EDUCATIONAL PRIORITIES PANEL CAPITAL PROMISES: WHY NYC CHILDREN DON’T HAVE THE SCHOOL BUILDINGS THEY NEED July 2007 This report was made possible by grants to the Educational Priorities Panel from The New York Community Trust and The Scherman Foundation and additional funding from the Schott Foundation for Public Education. Printing assistance for review copies of this report was provided by the office of NYC Councilmember Robert Jackson. Author: Noreen Connell SUMMARY AND INTRODUCTION The objective of this report is to answer the big questions about whether in the foreseeable future most school overcrowding in New York City will be eliminated and all city children will have class sizes and access to school libraries, science labs, art/music rooms, and physical fitness activities that are the norm for students in the rest of the state. The short answer is maybe, but not within the next few years. The Educational Priorities Panel (EPP) tackled these questions in the wake of a state budget agreement in the spring of 2006 to provide more school facilities funding to New York City. Instead of adopting a more ambitious BRICKS facilities plan fashioned by plaintiffs in a 14- year Campaign for Fiscal Equity (CFE) lawsuit, the NYS Legislature and the Governor created an EXCEL plan. This plan essentially met the Mayor’s demand that the financing of the city’s $13.1 billion Children First 2005-09 capital plan be restructured to ensure that at least half the funding be provided by the state. If the BRICKS plan had prevailed, the state would have provided the city school system with an additional $9.2 billion above the state’s $6.5 billion commitment for half of the city’s capital plan funding.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Protein-Small Molecule Structure Predictions with Ensemble Methods, Or
    Improving Protein-Small Molecule Structure Predictions with Ensemble Methods, or Using Computers to Guess How Tiny Things Fit Together By Darwin Yu Fu Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Vanderbilt University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Chemistry August 31, 2018 Nashville, Tennessee Approved: Professor Jens Meiler Professor Terry Lybrand Professor Andes Hess Professor Tony Capra DEDICATIONS I would like to dedicate this work to my family for providing me with this opportunity to delve into a fascinating world of science. To my parents, Cary and Yao, without whose sacrifices and risk-taking I would not be here in this country. To my brother, Daniel, for challenging me and giving me the chance to pass on the lessons I have learned. The three of you have been incredible supportive and keep me reminded of where I came from and who I am. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Research is a team effort both inside and outside of the lab. Though my name is on the front page of this dissertation, the research presented here would not be possible without the help of a significant number of people. To start, I would like to thank my advisor, Dr. Jens Meiler, for his mentorship over the course of my graduate career. I remember the first day in lab when he offered me the choice of working on ”small molecule docking” or ”protein secondary structure modeling”, and I just picked one and ran with it for six years. I admire his ability to make deep insightful comments on a project while maintaining the overall wide picture of research goals.
    [Show full text]
  • Hypotheses for Drug Repurposing and Understanding Side-Effects Matthieu Chartier1, Louis-Philippe Morency1, María Inés Zylber1,2 and Rafael J
    Chartier et al. BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology (2017) 18:18 DOI 10.1186/s40360-017-0128-7 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Large-scale detection of drug off-targets: hypotheses for drug repurposing and understanding side-effects Matthieu Chartier1, Louis-Philippe Morency1, María Inés Zylber1,2 and Rafael J. Najmanovich1,2* Abstract Background: Promiscuity in molecular interactions between small-molecules, including drugs, and proteins is widespread. Such unintended interactions can be exploited to suggest drug repurposing possibilities as well as to identify potential molecular mechanisms responsible for observed side-effects. Methods: We perform a large-scale analysis to detect binding-site molecular interaction field similarities between the binding-sites of the primary target of 400 drugs against a dataset of 14082 cavities within 7895 different proteins representing a non-redundant dataset of all proteins with known structure. Statistically-significant cases with high levels of similarities represent potential cases where the drugs that bind the original target may in principle bind the suggested off-target. Such cases are further analysed with docking simulations to verify if indeed thedrugcould,inprinciple,bindtheoff-target.Diversesources of data are integrated to associated potential cross-reactivity targets with side-effects. Results: We observe that promiscuous binding-sites tend to display higher levels of hydrophobic and aromatic similarities. Focusing on the most statistically significant similarities (Z-score ≥ 3.0) and corroborating docking results (RMSD < 2.0 Å), we find 2923 cases involving 140 unique drugs and 1216 unique potential cross-reactivity protein targets. We highlight a few cases with a potential for drug repurposing (acetazolamide as a chorismate pyruvate lyase inhibitor, raloxifene as a bacterial quorum sensing inhibitor) as well as to explain the side-effects of zanamivir and captopril.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mechanism and Active Compounds of Semen Armeniacae Amarum Treating Coronavirus Disease 2019 Based on Network Pharmacology and Molecular Docking
    food & nutrition research ORIGINAL ARTICLE The mechanism and active compounds of semen armeniacae amarum treating coronavirus disease 2019 based on network pharmacology and molecular docking Yuehua Wang1, Wenwen Gu1, Fuguang Kui1, Fan Gao1, Yuji Niu1, Wenwen Li1, Yaru Zhang1, Zhenzhen Guo1,* and Gangjun Du1,2,* 1Institute of Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical College of Henan University, Jinming District, Kaifeng, Henan Province, China; 2School of Pharmacy and Chemical Engineering, Zhengzhou University of Industry Technology, Xinzheng, Henan Province, China Popular scientific summary • Amygdalin is a candidate compound for COVID-19 treatment by regulating IL6, SRC, MAPK1 EGFR and VEGFA to involve in PI3K-Akt signaling pathway, VEGF signaling pathway and MAPK signaling pathway. • Amygdalin has a strong affinity for SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro and SARS-CoV-2 ACE2 and therefore prevents the virus transcription and dissemination. • Amygdalin prevents LPS-induced lung inflammation. Abstract Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak is progressing rapidly, and poses significant threats to public health. A number of clinical practice results showed that traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) plays a significant role for COVID-19 treatment. Objective: To explore the active components and molecular mechanism of semen armeniacae amarum treating COVID-19 by network pharmacology and molecular docking technology. Methods: The active components and potential targets of semen armeniacae amarum were retrieved from traditional Chinese medicine systems pharmacology (TCMSP) database. Coronavirus disease 2019- associated targets were collected in the GeneCards, TTD, OMIM and PubChem database. Compound target, compound-target pathway and medicine-ingredient-target disease networks were constructed by Cytoscape 3.8.0. Protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks were drawn using the STRING database and Cytoscape 3.8.0 software.
    [Show full text]
  • Mohini Gore Umesh B. Jagtap Editors Computational Drug Discovery and Design M ETHODS in M OLECULAR B IOLOGY
    Methods in Molecular Biology 1762 Mohini Gore Umesh B. Jagtap Editors Computational Drug Discovery and Design M ETHODS IN M OLECULAR B IOLOGY Series Editor John M. Walker School of Life and Medical Sciences University of Hertfordshire Hatfield, Hertfordshire, AL10 9AB, UK For further volumes: http://www.springer.com/series/7651 Computational Drug Discovery and Design Edited by Mohini Gore Department of Basic and Applied Sciences, Dayananda Sagar University, Bangalore, KA, India Umesh B. Jagtap Department of Biotechnology, Shivaji University, Kolhapur, MH, India; Department of Botany, Government Vidarbha Institute of Science and Humanities, Amaravati, MH, India Editors Mohini Gore Umesh B. Jagtap Department of Basic and Applied Department of Biotechnology Sciences Shivaji University Dayananda Sagar University Kolhapur, MH, India Bangalore, KA, India Department of Botany Government Vidarbha Institute of Science and Humanities Amaravati, MH, India ISSN 1064-3745 ISSN 1940-6029 (electronic) Methods in Molecular Biology ISBN 978-1-4939-7755-0 ISBN 978-1-4939-7756-7 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7756-7 Library of Congress Control Number: 2018935920 © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Rational Design of Novel BCL2A1 Inhibitors for Treatment of Autoimmune Diseases: an Integration of Virtual Screening, Transcriptomics and Protein Biophysics
    Rational Design of Novel BCL2A1 Inhibitors for Treatment of Autoimmune Diseases: An Integration of Virtual Screening, Transcriptomics and Protein Biophysics A Dissertation submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Cincinnati in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy In the Department of Molecular Genetics, Biochemistry and Microbiology of the College of Medicine By Alexander Thorman B.S./B.A. Miami University 2012 Committee Chair: Jaroslaw Meller, Ph.D. Abstract The balance between cell survival and apoptosis is critical to the modulation of immune responses and misregulation of this balance often mediates diseases such as intrauterine inflammation, rheumatoid arthritis and cancer. The pro-survival proteins of the BCL2-family mediate a pro-survival phenotype through sequestration of the BH3-domain peptides that act as sensitizers to Bax and Bak, which serve as the cell executioners, resulting in mitochondrial outer membrane permeability. This dissertation deals with the design of small molecule inhibitors of BCL2A1 (A1), which has been implicated in a wide array of diseases ranging from autoimmunity resulting in pre-term birth to chemotherapeutic resistance in cancer. To date, no inhibitors specific to A1 have been identified and most that target the BCL2 protein family are unable to effectively block A1 activity. The strategy employed uses a range of approaches for the rational discovery of A1-BH3 interface inhibitors. Structure-informed or rational design of small molecules that are predicted to interact with A1 at the interface, thus sterically blocking BH3 peptides from binding, presents an opportunity to demonstrate how disrupting critical protein-protein interactions may be used to drive protection from autoimmunity, as well as blocking of a compensatory pro-survival mechanism in cancers treated with pro-apoptotic drugs.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review on Applications of Molecular Docking in Drug Designing
    Indo American Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, 2017 ISSN NO: 2231-6876 A REVIEW ON APPLICATIONS OF MOLECULAR DOCKING IN DRUG DESIGNING 1* 2 1 M. Venkata Saileela , Dr. M. Venkateswar Rao , Venkata Rao Vutla 1Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis, Chalapathi Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Lam, Guntur. 2 Department of Pharmacology, Guntur Medical College, Guntur. ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article history Molecular docking is a computational modelling of structure of complexes formed by two or Received 11/04/2017 more interacting molecules. In the field of molecular modelling, docking is a method which Available online predicts the preferred orientation of one molecule to a second when bound to each other to 30/04/2017 form a stable complex. Knowledge of the preferred orientation in turn may be used to predict the strength of association or binding affinity between two molecules using scoring functions. Keywords Molecular docking is one of the most frequently used in structure based drug design due to its Molecular Modelling, ability to predict the binding-conformation of small molecules ligands to the appropriate Scoring Functions. target binding site. Corresponding author M. Venkata Saileela Department Pharmaceutical Analysis, Chalapathi institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Lam, Guntur [email protected] Please cite this article in press as M. Venkata Saileela et al. A Review on Applications of Molecular Docking in Drug Designing. Indo American Journal of Pharmaceutical Research.2017:7(04). C opy right © 2017 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Indo American journal of Pharmaceutical 8391 Research, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
    [Show full text]
  • Mycatalog-Aplusa13-Prod-02-E.Pdf
    A+A – Safety, Security A+A – Safety, Security and Health at Work and Health at Work www.aplusa.de www.aplusa.de Personal guide for: EMail: Product category: 02 - Health at work Search Criteria: Company Figures • Company Profile • Contact Persons • Exhibitors with address and hall location • Hall map for each exhibitor • News / Product News • Product groups with descriptions and illustrations • main_prod_no • Messe Düsseldorf GmbH Postfach 101006 40001 Düsseldorf Germany Tel. +49 (0)221 / 45 60-01 Fax +49 (0)221 / 45 60-668 www.messe-duesseldorf.de © 2015 Messe Düsseldorf GmbH 3 © 2015 Messe Düsseldorf GmbH 4 A+A – Safety, Security A+A – Safety, Security and Health at Work and Health at Work www.aplusa.de www.aplusa.de Contents 1.37 Erbstößer GmbH ......................... 105 1.38 ERGOKOMFORT GmbH .................... 109 1.39 Ergomat A/S ........................... 112 1 Exhibitors ................................. 9 1.40 ergonomiepartner e.V. ...................... 114 1.1 adamus group GmbH ...................... 9 1.41 Ergorest Oy ............................ 116 1.2 AKLA AB ............................. 11 1.42 Erich Voss GmbH ......................... 117 1.3 Ambratec GmbH ......................... 13 1.43 Escape Mobility Company GmbH ................ 125 1.4 Andreas Karl GmbH & Co. KG ................. 15 1.44 ESE International bv ....................... 126 1.5 asecos GmbH Sicherheit und Umweltschutz .......... 17 1.45 Foshan Longs Economic Development Co., Ltd. ....... 128 1.6 ASSTEC Assembly Technology GmbH & Co. KG ....... 18 1.46 Franz Mensch GmbH ...................... 130 1.7 Azett GmbH & Co. KG ...................... 19 1.47 FSP-Tech GmbH ......................... 132 1.8 B-Safety GmbH .......................... 21 1.48 Fürstenberg Institut GmbH .................... 134 1.9 B.A.D Gesundheitsvorsorge und Sicherheitstechnik GmbH . 23 1.49 GAUKE Healthcare (Hubei) Co., Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • CANDOCK: Chemical Atomic Network Based Hierarchical Flexible Docking Algorithm Using Generalized Statistical Potentials
    CANDOCK: Chemical atomic network based hierarchical flexible docking algorithm using generalized statistical potentials Jonathan Fine1, ‡, Janez Konc2, ‡, Ram Samudrala3, Gaurav Chopra1,4,5,6,7 * 1Department of Chemistry, Purdue University, 720 Clinic Drive, West Lafayette, IN 47906 2National Institute of Chemistry, Hajdrihova 19, SI−1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia 3Department of Biomedical Informatics, SUNY, Buffalo, NY, USA 4Purdue Institute for Drug Discovery 5Purdue Center for Cancer Research 6Purdue Institute for Inflammation, Immunology and Infectious Disease 7Purdue Institute for Integrative Neuroscience ‡These authors share equal contribution to this work. *Corresponding Author E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Small molecule docking has proven to be invaluable for drug design and discovery. However, existing docking methods have several limitations, such as, ignoring interactions with essential components in the chemical environment of the binding pocket (e.g. cofactors, metal-ions, etc.), incomplete sampling of chemically relevant ligand conformational space, and they are unable to consistently correlate docking scores of the best binding pose with experimental binding affinities. We present CANDOCK, a novel docking algorithm that utilizes a hierarchical approach to reconstruct ligands from an atomic grid using graph theory and generalized statistical potential functions to sample chemical relevant ligand conformations. Our algorithm accounts for protein flexibility, solvent, metal ions and cofactors interactions in the binding pocket that are traditionally ignored by current methods. We evaluate the algorithm on the PDBbind and Astex proteins to show its ability to reproduce the binding mode of the ligands that is independent of the initial ligand conformation in these benchmarks. Finally, we identify the best selector and ranker potential functions, such that, the statistical score of best selected docked pose correlates with the experimental binding affinities of the ligands for any given protein target.
    [Show full text]
  • Computational Biology/Bioinformatics on a Budget. Introduction
    Title: Computational Biology/Bioinformatics on a budget. Hovakim Grabski* Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Institute of Biomedicine and Pharmacy, Russian-Armenian University, Yerevan, Armenia * To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email [email protected] Phone: +374 98 73 02 94 Abstract: Computational biology/bioinformatics is very expensive, but thanks to the recent developments in the semiconductor industry there is a relative budget solution. Here I present how a budget lab was set up based on the grant experience for in silico screening of compounds, which target the quorum sensing system of P. aeruginosa. This knowledge could be used by other lower income countries that are trying to perform computational biology/bioinformatics studies. Keywords: Computational biology, bioinformatics, budget, virtual screening, molecular docking, molecular dynamics. Introduction: There are significant challenges that need to be overcome. According to World Bank the current economic situation of Armenia remains difficult and was classified until recently as lower middle income country [1], but grant amounts are still very limited and used meticulously. Computational biology/bioinformatics is very expensive, but thanks to the recent developments in the semiconductor industry there is a relative budget solution. The recent release of the AMDs CPU (central processing units) it is possible to acquire CPUs with 8 cores and 16 threads for a reasonable price. A central processing unit (CPU) is the electronic circuitry within a computer that carries out the instructions of a computer program. Building budget computational lab has never been that easy or affordable, but now it is. This paper is based on my experience from the ANSEF research grant (molbio 4904).
    [Show full text]
  • An Exhaustive Evaluation Using Tailor-Made Data Sets (Prospeccts)
    RESEARCH ARTICLE A benchmark driven guide to binding site comparison: An exhaustive evaluation using tailor-made data sets (ProSPECCTs) 1 1,2 1 Christiane EhrtID , Tobias BrinkjostID , Oliver KochID * 1 Faculty of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany, 2 Department of Computer Science, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany * [email protected], [email protected] a1111111111 a1111111111 a1111111111 Abstract a1111111111 a1111111111 The automated comparison of protein-ligand binding sites provides useful insights into yet unexplored site similarities. Various stages of computational and chemical biology research can benefit from this knowledge. The search for putative off-targets and the establishment of polypharmacological effects by comparing binding sites led to promising results for numerous projects. Although many cavity comparison methods are available, a comprehensive analysis OPEN ACCESS to guide the choice of a tool for a specific application is wanting. Moreover, the broad variety Citation: Ehrt C, Brinkjost T, Koch O (2018) A benchmark driven guide to binding site of binding site modeling approaches, comparison algorithms, and scoring metrics impedes comparison: An exhaustive evaluation using tailor- this choice. Herein, we aim to elucidate strengths and weaknesses of binding site comparison made data sets (ProSPECCTs). PLoS Comput Biol methodologies. A detailed benchmark study is the only possibility to rationalize the selection 14(11): e1006483. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. of appropriate tools for different scenarios. Specific evaluation data sets were developed to pcbi.1006483 shed light on multiple aspects of binding site comparison. An assembly of all applied bench- Editor: Bjoern Peters, La Jolla Institute for Allergy mark sets (ProSPECCTs±Protein Site Pairs for the Evaluation of Cavity Comparison Tools) and Immunology, UNITED STATES is made available for the evaluation and optimization of further and still emerging methods.
    [Show full text]
  • Artemisinin with Human Serum Albumin and Genomic DNA
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/519710; this version posted January 13, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. In vitro and in silico identification of the mechanism of interaction of antimalarial drug – artemisinin with human serum albumin and genomic DNA Siranush Ginosyan1, Hovakim Grabski1, Susanna Tiratsuyan1,2 1Institute of Biomedicine and Pharmacy, Russian-Armenian University 2Faculty of Biology, Yerevan State University Corresponding author: Siranush Ginosyan, 123 Hovsep Emin str., Yerevan, 0051 Armenia. Tel.: +37477314114, Email: [email protected] bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/519710; this version posted January 13, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Highlights ● Artemisinin quenches the fluorescence of HSA by a static mechanism. ● Artemisinin quenches fluorescence of tryptophan. ● The optimized HSA structure was obtained through molecular dynamics simulations. ● Artemisinin binds with HSA in Drug site I and forms a hydrogen bond with Arg218. ● Dexamethasone binds with HSA in Drug site I and forms hydrogen bonds with Arg218, Arg222 and Val343. ● A hypothetical scheme of the mechanism of action of artemisinin was proposed. Abstract Artemisinins are secondary metabolites of the medicinal plant Artemisia annua, which has been traditionally used in Chinese medicine.
    [Show full text]