High-Throughput Prediction and Analysis of Drug-Protein Interactions in the Druggable Human Proteome

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

High-Throughput Prediction and Analysis of Drug-Protein Interactions in the Druggable Human Proteome Virginia Commonwealth University VCU Scholars Compass Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 2018 High-throughput prediction and analysis of drug-protein interactions in the druggable human proteome Chen Wang Virginia Commonwealth University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd Part of the Bioinformatics Commons © The Author Downloaded from https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd/5509 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at VCU Scholars Compass. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of VCU Scholars Compass. For more information, please contact [email protected]. High-throughput prediction and analysis of drug-protein interactions in the druggable human proteome A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the Virginia Commonwealth University. by Chen Wang Ph.D., Department of Computer Science May 17, 2018 Supervisor: Lukasz Kurgan Ph.D., Qimonda Endowed Professor, Department of Computer Science Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia May 2018 Acknowledgment First, I would like to express my deep gratitude to my supervisor Dr. Lukasz Kurgan for all his continuous motivation, guidance, support, encouragement, enthusiasm, knowledge, and time that have helped me over the last few years to become a better researcher. Dr. Kurgan is the best advisor for directing my development in work and also the best mentor for answering my concerns in life. I am grateful to the members of my dissertation committee, Dr. Tomasz Arodz, Dr. Michal Brylinski, Dr. Krzysztof Cios, and Dr. Vladimir Uversky. Their constructive suggestions and inspiring comments helped me to clarify my understanding of the project and improve the quality of this work. I would like to thank other members and visitors of the BioMine lab for their collaboration and support. Thanks to my friends and all the people who helped me to complete my PhD journey. Last, but not least, I would like to thank my family for their unconditional love and endless encouragement. Thanks to our parents for taking care of their kids and our kid. Thanks to my marvelous wife Xiao for everything. Also thanks to our son Jonathan for being cute and bringing happiness and surprise to our life. ii Dedication This dissertation is dedicated to my wife, our parents, and our son. iii Preface This dissertation is an original work conducted by Chen Wang. It includes materials and results from the following publications and submitted works. [1] Wang C, Hu G, Wang K, Brylinski M, Xie L, Kurgan LA. PDID: database of molecular- level putative protein-drug interactions in the structural human proteome. Bioinformatics, 32(4): 579-586, 2016 [2] Wang C, Kurgan LA. Survey of similarity-based prediction of drug-protein interactions. Revision submitted to the Current Medicinal Chemistry journal on April 15, 2018. [3] Wang C, Kurgan LA. Review and comparative assessment of similarity-based methods for prediction of drug-protein interactions in the druggable human proteome. Submitted to the Briefings in Bioinformatics journal on May 1, 2018. Chapter 3 of this dissertation is based on Ref [1]. Materials from Chapter 4 and 5 have been submitted for publication as Ref [2] and [3], respectively. iv Table of Contents Table of Contents............................................................................................................................ v List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. ix List of Figures................................................................................................................................. x Abstract......................................................................................................................................... xii Chapter 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Goals of the dissertation ................................................................................................... 3 Chapter 2 Background on drug-protein interactions....................................................................... 5 2.1 Protein sequence and structure ......................................................................................... 5 2.2 Drug and drug-protein interaction .................................................................................... 7 2.3 Protein structure-based methods..................................................................................... 10 2.4 Similarity-based methods ............................................................................................... 14 Chapter 3 Evaluation of protein structure-based predictions of drug-protein interactions and development and deployment of protein-drug interaction database ............................................. 17 3.1 Motivation to develop a novel database ......................................................................... 17 v 3.2 Considered protein structure-based predictors ............................................................... 21 3.2.1 FINDSITE and eFindSite..................................................................................... 21 3.2.2 SMAP................................................................................................................... 23 3.2.3 ILbind................................................................................................................... 26 3.3 Assessment of predictive quality.................................................................................... 27 3.4 Protein-drug interaction database ................................................................................... 29 3.4.1 Contents and availability...................................................................................... 29 3.4.2 User interface ....................................................................................................... 32 3.5 Conclusions..................................................................................................................... 36 Chapter 4 Review of the similarity-based predictions of drug-protein interactions..................... 38 4.1 Overview of recent surveys ............................................................................................ 38 4.2 Selection and overview of similarity-based DPI predictors ........................................... 41 4.3 Source databases............................................................................................................. 43 4.3.1 Timeline and impact............................................................................................. 44 4.3.2 Data contents........................................................................................................ 48 4.3.3 Relationships between source databases.............................................................. 51 4.3.4 Other drug-target interaction databases ............................................................... 55 4.4 Similarity-based predictors............................................................................................. 58 4.4.1 Categorization of predictors................................................................................. 58 4.4.2 Timeline, impact, and availability ....................................................................... 58 vi 4.4.3 Internal databases................................................................................................. 61 4.4.4 Predictive models................................................................................................. 66 4.4.5 Timeline of the use of similarities and their ensembles....................................... 70 4.4.6 Critique of the current assessments of predictive performance ........................... 72 4.5 Conclusions..................................................................................................................... 74 Chapter 5 Empirical assessment and comparative analysis of similarity-based methods for prediction of drug-protein interactions ......................................................................................... 78 5.1 Experimental setup ......................................................................................................... 79 5.1.1 Computation of similarities.................................................................................. 79 5.1.2 Prediction of drug-protein interactions ................................................................ 81 5.1.3 Benchmark database of drug-protein interactions ............................................... 82 5.1.4 Assessment of predictive performance ................................................................ 89 5.2 Empirical analysis of predictive performance ................................................................ 91 5.2.1 Assessment of predictive performance at the drug-protein interaction level....... 91 5.2.2 Assessment of predictive performance at drug level ........................................... 99 5.3 Sensitivity of predictive performance to characteristics of predictors ......................... 102 5.3.1 Sensitivity to intrinsic characteristics ................................................................ 103 5.3.2 Sensitivity to extrinsic
Recommended publications
  • Folic Acid Antagonists: Antimicrobial and Immunomodulating Mechanisms and Applications
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Folic Acid Antagonists: Antimicrobial and Immunomodulating Mechanisms and Applications Daniel Fernández-Villa 1, Maria Rosa Aguilar 1,2 and Luis Rojo 1,2,* 1 Instituto de Ciencia y Tecnología de Polímeros, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, CSIC, 28006 Madrid, Spain; [email protected] (D.F.-V.); [email protected] (M.R.A.) 2 Consorcio Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina, 28029 Madrid, Spain * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +34-915-622-900 Received: 18 September 2019; Accepted: 7 October 2019; Published: 9 October 2019 Abstract: Bacterial, protozoan and other microbial infections share an accelerated metabolic rate. In order to ensure a proper functioning of cell replication and proteins and nucleic acids synthesis processes, folate metabolism rate is also increased in these cases. For this reason, folic acid antagonists have been used since their discovery to treat different kinds of microbial infections, taking advantage of this metabolic difference when compared with human cells. However, resistances to these compounds have emerged since then and only combined therapies are currently used in clinic. In addition, some of these compounds have been found to have an immunomodulatory behavior that allows clinicians using them as anti-inflammatory or immunosuppressive drugs. Therefore, the aim of this review is to provide an updated state-of-the-art on the use of antifolates as antibacterial and immunomodulating agents in the clinical setting, as well as to present their action mechanisms and currently investigated biomedical applications. Keywords: folic acid antagonists; antifolates; antibiotics; antibacterials; immunomodulation; sulfonamides; antimalarial 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Infection Prevention in Combat-Related Injuries CPG ID: 24 APPENDIX B: POST-INJURY ANTIMICROBIAL AGENT SELECTION and DURATION BASED UPON INJURY PATTERN
    Infection Prevention in Combat-Related Injuries CPG ID: 24 APPENDIX B: POST-INJURY ANTIMICROBIAL AGENT SELECTION AND DURATION BASED UPON INJURY PATTERN INJURY PREFERRED AGENT(S) ALTERNATE AGENT(S) DURATION EXTREMITY WOUNDS (INCLUDES SKIN, SOFT TISSUE, BONE) Skin, soft tissue, no open fractures Cefazolin, 2 gm IV q6-8h†‡ Clindamycin (300-450 mg PO TID or 600 mg IV q8h) 1-3 days Skin, soft tissue, with open Cefazolin 2 gm IV q6-8h†‡§ Clindamycin 600 mg IV q8h 1-3 days fractures, exposed bone, or open joints THORACIC WOUNDS Penetrating chest injury without Cefazolin, 2 gm IV q6-8h†‡ Clindamycin (300-450 mg PO TID or 600 mg IV q8h) 1 day esophageal disruption Penetrating chest injury with Cefazolin 2 gm IVq 6-8h†‡ PLUS metronidazole 500 Ertapenem 1 gm IV x 1 dose, OR moxifloxacin 400 mg 1 day after definitive esophageal disruption mg IV q8-12h IV x 1 dose washout ABDOMINAL WOUNDS Penetrating abdominal injury with Cefazolin 2 gm IV q 6-8h†‡ PLUS metronidazole 500 Ertapenem 1 gm IV x 1 dose, OR moxifloxacin 400 mg 1 day after definitive suspected/known hollow viscus mg IV q8-12h IV x 1 dose washout injury and soilage; may apply to rectal/perineal injuries as well MAXILLOFACIAL AND NECK WOUNDS Open maxillofacial fractures, or Cefazolin 2 gm IV q6-8h†‡ Clindamycin 600 mg IV q8h 1 day maxillofacial fractures with foreign body or fixation device CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM WOUNDS Penetrating brain injury Cefazolin 2 gm IV q6-8h.†‡ Consider adding Ceftriaxone 2 gm IV q24h. Consider adding 5 days or until CSF metronidazole 500 mg IV q8-12h if gross metronidazole 500 mg IV q8-12h if gross contamination with organic debris contamination with organic debris.
    [Show full text]
  • Educational Priorities Panel Capital Promises
    EDUCATIONAL PRIORITIES PANEL CAPITAL PROMISES: WHY NYC CHILDREN DON’T HAVE THE SCHOOL BUILDINGS THEY NEED July 2007 This report was made possible by grants to the Educational Priorities Panel from The New York Community Trust and The Scherman Foundation and additional funding from the Schott Foundation for Public Education. Printing assistance for review copies of this report was provided by the office of NYC Councilmember Robert Jackson. Author: Noreen Connell SUMMARY AND INTRODUCTION The objective of this report is to answer the big questions about whether in the foreseeable future most school overcrowding in New York City will be eliminated and all city children will have class sizes and access to school libraries, science labs, art/music rooms, and physical fitness activities that are the norm for students in the rest of the state. The short answer is maybe, but not within the next few years. The Educational Priorities Panel (EPP) tackled these questions in the wake of a state budget agreement in the spring of 2006 to provide more school facilities funding to New York City. Instead of adopting a more ambitious BRICKS facilities plan fashioned by plaintiffs in a 14- year Campaign for Fiscal Equity (CFE) lawsuit, the NYS Legislature and the Governor created an EXCEL plan. This plan essentially met the Mayor’s demand that the financing of the city’s $13.1 billion Children First 2005-09 capital plan be restructured to ensure that at least half the funding be provided by the state. If the BRICKS plan had prevailed, the state would have provided the city school system with an additional $9.2 billion above the state’s $6.5 billion commitment for half of the city’s capital plan funding.
    [Show full text]
  • Sulfonamides and Sulfonamide Combinations*
    Sulfonamides and Sulfonamide Combinations* Overview Due to low cost and relative efficacy against many common bacterial infections, sulfonamides and sulfonamide combinations with diaminopyrimidines are some of the most common antibacterial agents utilized in veterinary medicine. The sulfonamides are derived from sulfanilamide. These chemicals are structural analogues of ρ-aminobenzoic acid (PABA). All sulfonamides are characterized by the same chemical nucleus. Functional groups are added to the amino group or substitutions made on the amino group to facilitate varying chemical, physical and pharmacologic properties and antibacterial spectra. Most sulfonamides are too alkaline for routine parenteral use. Therefore the drug is most commonly administered orally except in life threatening systemic infections. However, sulfonamide preparations can be administered orally, intramuscularly, intravenously, intraperitoneally, intrauterally and topically. Sulfonamides are effective against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Some protozoa, such as coccidians, Toxoplasma species and plasmodia, are generally sensitive. Chlamydia, Nocardia and Actinomyces species are also sensitive. Veterinary diseases commonly treated by sulfonamides are actinobacillosis, coccidioidosis, mastitis, metritis, colibacillosis, pododermatitis, polyarthritis, respiratory infections and toxo- plasmosis. Strains of rickettsiae, Pseudomonas, Klebsiella, Proteus, Clostridium and Leptospira species are often highly resistant. Sulfonamides are bacteriostatic antimicrobials
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Protein-Small Molecule Structure Predictions with Ensemble Methods, Or
    Improving Protein-Small Molecule Structure Predictions with Ensemble Methods, or Using Computers to Guess How Tiny Things Fit Together By Darwin Yu Fu Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Vanderbilt University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Chemistry August 31, 2018 Nashville, Tennessee Approved: Professor Jens Meiler Professor Terry Lybrand Professor Andes Hess Professor Tony Capra DEDICATIONS I would like to dedicate this work to my family for providing me with this opportunity to delve into a fascinating world of science. To my parents, Cary and Yao, without whose sacrifices and risk-taking I would not be here in this country. To my brother, Daniel, for challenging me and giving me the chance to pass on the lessons I have learned. The three of you have been incredible supportive and keep me reminded of where I came from and who I am. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Research is a team effort both inside and outside of the lab. Though my name is on the front page of this dissertation, the research presented here would not be possible without the help of a significant number of people. To start, I would like to thank my advisor, Dr. Jens Meiler, for his mentorship over the course of my graduate career. I remember the first day in lab when he offered me the choice of working on ”small molecule docking” or ”protein secondary structure modeling”, and I just picked one and ran with it for six years. I admire his ability to make deep insightful comments on a project while maintaining the overall wide picture of research goals.
    [Show full text]
  • Hypotheses for Drug Repurposing and Understanding Side-Effects Matthieu Chartier1, Louis-Philippe Morency1, María Inés Zylber1,2 and Rafael J
    Chartier et al. BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology (2017) 18:18 DOI 10.1186/s40360-017-0128-7 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Large-scale detection of drug off-targets: hypotheses for drug repurposing and understanding side-effects Matthieu Chartier1, Louis-Philippe Morency1, María Inés Zylber1,2 and Rafael J. Najmanovich1,2* Abstract Background: Promiscuity in molecular interactions between small-molecules, including drugs, and proteins is widespread. Such unintended interactions can be exploited to suggest drug repurposing possibilities as well as to identify potential molecular mechanisms responsible for observed side-effects. Methods: We perform a large-scale analysis to detect binding-site molecular interaction field similarities between the binding-sites of the primary target of 400 drugs against a dataset of 14082 cavities within 7895 different proteins representing a non-redundant dataset of all proteins with known structure. Statistically-significant cases with high levels of similarities represent potential cases where the drugs that bind the original target may in principle bind the suggested off-target. Such cases are further analysed with docking simulations to verify if indeed thedrugcould,inprinciple,bindtheoff-target.Diversesources of data are integrated to associated potential cross-reactivity targets with side-effects. Results: We observe that promiscuous binding-sites tend to display higher levels of hydrophobic and aromatic similarities. Focusing on the most statistically significant similarities (Z-score ≥ 3.0) and corroborating docking results (RMSD < 2.0 Å), we find 2923 cases involving 140 unique drugs and 1216 unique potential cross-reactivity protein targets. We highlight a few cases with a potential for drug repurposing (acetazolamide as a chorismate pyruvate lyase inhibitor, raloxifene as a bacterial quorum sensing inhibitor) as well as to explain the side-effects of zanamivir and captopril.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mechanism and Active Compounds of Semen Armeniacae Amarum Treating Coronavirus Disease 2019 Based on Network Pharmacology and Molecular Docking
    food & nutrition research ORIGINAL ARTICLE The mechanism and active compounds of semen armeniacae amarum treating coronavirus disease 2019 based on network pharmacology and molecular docking Yuehua Wang1, Wenwen Gu1, Fuguang Kui1, Fan Gao1, Yuji Niu1, Wenwen Li1, Yaru Zhang1, Zhenzhen Guo1,* and Gangjun Du1,2,* 1Institute of Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical College of Henan University, Jinming District, Kaifeng, Henan Province, China; 2School of Pharmacy and Chemical Engineering, Zhengzhou University of Industry Technology, Xinzheng, Henan Province, China Popular scientific summary • Amygdalin is a candidate compound for COVID-19 treatment by regulating IL6, SRC, MAPK1 EGFR and VEGFA to involve in PI3K-Akt signaling pathway, VEGF signaling pathway and MAPK signaling pathway. • Amygdalin has a strong affinity for SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro and SARS-CoV-2 ACE2 and therefore prevents the virus transcription and dissemination. • Amygdalin prevents LPS-induced lung inflammation. Abstract Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak is progressing rapidly, and poses significant threats to public health. A number of clinical practice results showed that traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) plays a significant role for COVID-19 treatment. Objective: To explore the active components and molecular mechanism of semen armeniacae amarum treating COVID-19 by network pharmacology and molecular docking technology. Methods: The active components and potential targets of semen armeniacae amarum were retrieved from traditional Chinese medicine systems pharmacology (TCMSP) database. Coronavirus disease 2019- associated targets were collected in the GeneCards, TTD, OMIM and PubChem database. Compound target, compound-target pathway and medicine-ingredient-target disease networks were constructed by Cytoscape 3.8.0. Protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks were drawn using the STRING database and Cytoscape 3.8.0 software.
    [Show full text]
  • Mohini Gore Umesh B. Jagtap Editors Computational Drug Discovery and Design M ETHODS in M OLECULAR B IOLOGY
    Methods in Molecular Biology 1762 Mohini Gore Umesh B. Jagtap Editors Computational Drug Discovery and Design M ETHODS IN M OLECULAR B IOLOGY Series Editor John M. Walker School of Life and Medical Sciences University of Hertfordshire Hatfield, Hertfordshire, AL10 9AB, UK For further volumes: http://www.springer.com/series/7651 Computational Drug Discovery and Design Edited by Mohini Gore Department of Basic and Applied Sciences, Dayananda Sagar University, Bangalore, KA, India Umesh B. Jagtap Department of Biotechnology, Shivaji University, Kolhapur, MH, India; Department of Botany, Government Vidarbha Institute of Science and Humanities, Amaravati, MH, India Editors Mohini Gore Umesh B. Jagtap Department of Basic and Applied Department of Biotechnology Sciences Shivaji University Dayananda Sagar University Kolhapur, MH, India Bangalore, KA, India Department of Botany Government Vidarbha Institute of Science and Humanities Amaravati, MH, India ISSN 1064-3745 ISSN 1940-6029 (electronic) Methods in Molecular Biology ISBN 978-1-4939-7755-0 ISBN 978-1-4939-7756-7 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7756-7 Library of Congress Control Number: 2018935920 © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Rational Design of Novel BCL2A1 Inhibitors for Treatment of Autoimmune Diseases: an Integration of Virtual Screening, Transcriptomics and Protein Biophysics
    Rational Design of Novel BCL2A1 Inhibitors for Treatment of Autoimmune Diseases: An Integration of Virtual Screening, Transcriptomics and Protein Biophysics A Dissertation submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Cincinnati in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy In the Department of Molecular Genetics, Biochemistry and Microbiology of the College of Medicine By Alexander Thorman B.S./B.A. Miami University 2012 Committee Chair: Jaroslaw Meller, Ph.D. Abstract The balance between cell survival and apoptosis is critical to the modulation of immune responses and misregulation of this balance often mediates diseases such as intrauterine inflammation, rheumatoid arthritis and cancer. The pro-survival proteins of the BCL2-family mediate a pro-survival phenotype through sequestration of the BH3-domain peptides that act as sensitizers to Bax and Bak, which serve as the cell executioners, resulting in mitochondrial outer membrane permeability. This dissertation deals with the design of small molecule inhibitors of BCL2A1 (A1), which has been implicated in a wide array of diseases ranging from autoimmunity resulting in pre-term birth to chemotherapeutic resistance in cancer. To date, no inhibitors specific to A1 have been identified and most that target the BCL2 protein family are unable to effectively block A1 activity. The strategy employed uses a range of approaches for the rational discovery of A1-BH3 interface inhibitors. Structure-informed or rational design of small molecules that are predicted to interact with A1 at the interface, thus sterically blocking BH3 peptides from binding, presents an opportunity to demonstrate how disrupting critical protein-protein interactions may be used to drive protection from autoimmunity, as well as blocking of a compensatory pro-survival mechanism in cancers treated with pro-apoptotic drugs.
    [Show full text]
  • 1.Why Are Sulfonamide Antibacterials Acidic?
    STUDY GUIDE 2: SYNTHETIC ANTIBACTERIALS: THE SULFONAMIDES: 1.Why are sulfonamide antibacterials acidic? Why are sulfonamides such as sulfisoxazole more acidic than sulfacetamide or sulfanilamide? Understand the relationship between resonance and acidity and be able to apply it relative acidity. 2. Why does the water solubility of the sulfonamides decrease as pH decreases as indicated in Table 1? DON'T MEMORIZE this table, just understand it. 3. What factors determine water solubility/lipophilicity 4. Do not memorize the drug structures shown in the chapter. You will not be asked to recall these from memory (see 24 below). 5. What bacterial enzyme does the sulfonamides inhibit to produce its chemotherapeutic effect? Why are they capable of inhibiting this enzyme? Specifically, how does this result in decreased bacterial DNA synthesis? Is this a static or cidal action? 6. What role does ionization and pKa play in mechanism of action and entry in target bacteria? 8. YOU NEED NOT MEMORIZE the folate biosynthetic scheme, but if given the structures of PABA and the DPAD precursor, you should be able to draw the structure of the DIHYDRO- PTEROATE product. 7. Why are the sulfonamides selectively toxic to bacterial cells versus mammalian cells (Selectivity)? 8. How and why do sulfonamides function as pseudo-substrates? 9. What are the known mechanisms of resistance to the sulfonamides? What is the MAJOR mechanism and how is it transferred to other bacteria? Which other antibacterial drug are sulfon- amide-resistant bacteria resistant to and why? 10. What gram positive and gram negative bacteria are the sulfonamides effective against. DON'T MEMORIZE TABLE 2.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review on Applications of Molecular Docking in Drug Designing
    Indo American Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, 2017 ISSN NO: 2231-6876 A REVIEW ON APPLICATIONS OF MOLECULAR DOCKING IN DRUG DESIGNING 1* 2 1 M. Venkata Saileela , Dr. M. Venkateswar Rao , Venkata Rao Vutla 1Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis, Chalapathi Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Lam, Guntur. 2 Department of Pharmacology, Guntur Medical College, Guntur. ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article history Molecular docking is a computational modelling of structure of complexes formed by two or Received 11/04/2017 more interacting molecules. In the field of molecular modelling, docking is a method which Available online predicts the preferred orientation of one molecule to a second when bound to each other to 30/04/2017 form a stable complex. Knowledge of the preferred orientation in turn may be used to predict the strength of association or binding affinity between two molecules using scoring functions. Keywords Molecular docking is one of the most frequently used in structure based drug design due to its Molecular Modelling, ability to predict the binding-conformation of small molecules ligands to the appropriate Scoring Functions. target binding site. Corresponding author M. Venkata Saileela Department Pharmaceutical Analysis, Chalapathi institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Lam, Guntur [email protected] Please cite this article in press as M. Venkata Saileela et al. A Review on Applications of Molecular Docking in Drug Designing. Indo American Journal of Pharmaceutical Research.2017:7(04). C opy right © 2017 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Indo American journal of Pharmaceutical 8391 Research, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
    [Show full text]
  • Syntheses and Structural Studies of Metal Complexes of Sulfa Drugs
    SYNTHESES AND STRUCTURAL STUDIES OF METAL COMPLEXES OF SULFA DRUGS A thesis submitted to the Cardiff University By G. M. Golzar Hossain in candidature of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 2005 Department of Chemistry Cardiff University UMI Number: U584873 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U584873 Published by ProQuest LLC 2013. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 DECLARATION This work has not previously been accepted in substance for any degree and is not being concurrently submitted in candidature for any degree. Signed (Candidate) Date: O 3 / ^ 6 STATEMENT 1 This thesis is the result of my own investigations, except where otherwise stated. Other sources are acknowledged by in the appended bibliography. Signed (Candidate) Date: STATEMENT 2 I hereby give consent for my thesis, if accepted, to be available for photocopying and for inter-library loan, and for the title and summary to be made available to outside organisations. Signed (Candidate) Date: / 3 / o 3 / II <tm ^d ic a te < d t o JAfroza andJAsif III ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work would not have been completed without the encouragement and patience of my supervisors Professor Peter G.
    [Show full text]