Get Ready for a Very Unexpected Taste of West Virginia
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
American Wine Society News
AMERICAN WINE SOCIETY® NEWS Promoting Appreciation of Wine Through Education Volume 31, No. 4 www.americanwinesociety.org August-September 2017 What’s Inside Boost Your Wine Smarts Aaron Mandel 2017 National Conference 16 50th Anniversary Activities 6 Wine Judge Training Year one of the Wine Judge Certification Program, to Amazon Smile 3 be held at the conference, is already sold out. This is not really a surprise because the program is usually Awards Nominations 11 full by the end of May these days, and we are al- ready receiving inquiries about the 2018 program. AWSEF Scholarship Awards 15 So, it is quite likely next year will sell out early as well. If you are interested in the program, please do not delay—apply right after Chapter Events 7 the November conference is over. Government Affairs 6 The sell-out of the Wine Judge Certification Program does not mean that there will be any lack of educational opportunities at the con- Learning from Wine Competition 5 ference. There are, of course, the many fine sessions for us to take Member Service News 4 advantage of, plus our new Super Tasting Series—Level I program. This is a full-day class that takes place on Nov. 2. It offers a begin- National Tasting Project 4 ning education about the primary wine varieties and regions in the world, along with an opportunity to taste wines from many of those Reflections on Silver 5 regions. We offered this program for the first time last year, and the reviews were overwhelmingly positive. Those who pass the Treasurer’s Report 12 exam are awarded a certificate. -
2019 Sommelier Challenge San Diego, CA September 20, 2019
2019 Sommelier Challenge San Diego, CA September 20, 2019 Adkins Family Vineyard 2017 Adkins Family Vineyards Great White Wine Alta Mesa Estate Vineyards Best Viognier 90 2018 Adkins Family Vineyards Zinfandel Alta Mesa Estate Vineyards Gold 91 2017 Adkins Family Vineyards Great White Wine Alta Mesa Estate Vineyards Gold 90 2018 Adkins Family Vineyards Chardonnay Alta Mesa Estate Vineyards Silver Alexander Valley Vineyards 2017 Alexander Valley Vineyards Homestead Red Alexander Valley Gold 90 Blend 2018 Alexander Valley Vineyards Dry Rose of Alexander Valley Gold 90 Sangiovese 2017 Alexander Valley Vineyards Merlot Alexander Valley Silver Allen Estate Wines 2016 Allen Wines Audacieux Cabernet Sauvignon Napa Valley Sugarloaf Gold 90 Mountain Vineyard 2016 Allen Wines Audacieux Cabernet Sauvignon Sonoma County Knights Link Gold 91 Vineyard 2017 Allen Wines Audacieux Pinot Noir Sonoma County King Arthur Silver Vineyard Arterra Wines 2016 Arterra Wines Petit Verdot Virginia Gold 92 2017 Arterra Wines Tannat Virginia Faquier County Gold 92 AUTRY CELLARS 2013 Autry Cellars Petite Sirah Paso Robles Silver 2013 Autry Cellars Tertian Harmony Paso Robles Silver Avanguardia Wines 2015 Avanguardia AMPIO Sierra Foothills Gold 90 2013 Avanguardia PREMIATO Sierra Foothills Gold 90 2011 Avanguardia SANGINETO Sierra Foothills Silver Axios Inc 2015 Kalaris Pinot Noir Sonoma Coast Gold 92 2014 Kalaris Cabernet Sauvignon Napa Valley Gold 90 2015 Kalaris Merlot Napa Valley Gold 90 2017 Kalaris Chardonnay Napa Valley Silver 2015 Philotimo Red Table Wine Napa -
Agreement Between the United States of America and the European Community on Trade in Wine
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY ON TRADE IN WINE USA/CE/en 1 The UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, hereafter "the United States", and • The EUROPEAN COMMUNITY, hereafter "the Community", hereafter referred to jointly as "the Parties", RECOGNIZING that the Parties desire to establish closer links in the wine sector, DETERMINED to foster the development of trade in wine within the framework of increased mutual understanding, RESOLVED to provide a harmonious environment for addressing wine trade issues between the Parties, HAVE AGREED AS FOLLOWS: USA/CE/en 2 • TITLE I INITIAL PROVISIONS ARTICLE 1 Objectives The objectives of this Agreement are: (a) to facilitate trade in wine between the Parties and to improve cooperation in the development and enhance the transparency of regulations affecting such trade; (b) to lay the foundation, as the first phase, for broad agreement on trade in wine between the Parties; and (c) to provide a framework for continued negotiations in the wine sector. USA/CE/en 3 ARTICLE 2 • Definitions For the purposes of this Agreement: (a) "wine-making practice" means a process, treatment, technique or material used to produce wine; (b) "COLA" means a Certificate of Label Approval or a Certificate of Exemption from Label Approval that results from an approved Application for and Certification/Exemption of Label/Bottle Approval, as required under U.S. federal laws and regulations and issued by the U.S. Government that includes a set of all labels approved to be firmly affixed to a bottle of wine; (c) "originating" when used in conjunction with the name of one of the Parties in respect of wine imported into the territory of the other Party means the wine has been produced in accordance with either Party's laws, regulations and requirements from grapes wholly obtained in the territory of the Party concerned; (d) "WTO Agreement" means the Marrakesh Agreement establishing the World Trade Organization, done on 15 April 1994. -
Fruit and Vegetable Programs Specialty Crop Block Grant Program
Fruit and Vegetable Programs Specialty Crop Block Grant Program Fiscal Year 2008 Farm Bill Description of Funded Projects The fifty States, the District of Columbia and five U.S. Territories were awarded Fiscal Year 2008 Farm Bill funds to perform a total of 252 projects that benefit the specialty crop industry. All the eligible entities submitted their applications by the established deadline of September 8, 2008. The approved awards are listed alphabetically. 2008 Farm Bill Project Delivery Types 36; 14% 108; 43% 108; 43% Competitive Grants Other State Programs State Program The proposal illustrated that the State department of agriculture planned to administer the project and/or a competitive grant program was not conducted. Competitive Grants The proposal demonstrated that a fair and open competition was conducted and the project partner(s) are clearly involved. Other The proposal illustrated that project partners met with the grantee to determine project priorities, but an open competitive grant program was not conducted. 2008 Farm Bill Project Types 24; 9% 19; 7% 15; 6% 27; 11% 14; 5% 2; 1% 156; 61% Education Food Safety Marketing & Promotion Other Pest & Plant Health Production Research Alabama Department of Agriculture and Industries Amount Awarded: $125,779.00 Number of Projects: 2 • Assist Alabama specialty crop producers with direct marketing, value-added operations, consumer education, agritourism and general promotions. • Expand and target families in the undeserved counties in Alabama to conduct workshops to teach parents how to incorporate fresh produce as a staple in the family's diet. Alaska Division of Agriculture Amount Awarded: $101,521.00 Number of Projects: 2 • Increase outreach efforts to Alaskan specialty crop farmers who are not currently part of the Alaska Grown program and develop a newsletter to alert food service industry wholesalers of the availability of Alaska Grown specialty crops through the hiring of a project assistant. -
Aglianico from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
Aglianico From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Aglianico (pronounced [aʎˈʎaːniko], roughly "ahl-YAH-nee- koe") is a black grape grown in the Basilicata and Campania Aglianico regions of Italy. The vine originated in Greece and was Grape (Vitis) brought to the south of Italy by Greek settlers. The name may be a corruption of vitis hellenica, Latin for "Greek vine."[1] Another etymology posits a corruption of Apulianicum, the Latin name for the whole of southern Italy in the time of ancient Rome. During this period, it was the principal grape of the famous Falernian wine, the Roman equivalent of a first-growth wine today. Contents Aglianico from Taurasi prior to veraison Color of Black 1 History berry skin 2 Relationship to other grapes Also called Gnanico, Agliatica, Ellenico, 3 Wine regions Ellanico and Uva Nera 3.1 Other regions Origin Greece 4 Viticulture Notable Taurasi, Aglianico del Vulture 5 Wine styles wines 6 Synonyms Hazards Peronospera 7 References History The vine is believed to have first been cultivated in Greece by the Phoceans from an ancestral vine that ampelographers have not yet identified. From Greece it was brought to Italy by settlers to Cumae near modern-day Pozzuoli, and from there spread to various points in the regions of Campania and Basilicata. While still grown in Italy, the original Greek plantings seem to have disappeared.[2] In ancient Rome, the grape was the principal component of the world's earliest first-growth wine, Falernian.[1] Ruins from the Greek Along with a white grape known as Greco (today grown as Greco di Tufo), the grape settlement of Cumae. -
Description of Funded Projects
Transportation and Marketing Specialty Crop Block Grant Program Fiscal Year 2013 Description of Funded Projects The fifty States, the District of Columbia, and three U.S. Territories were awarded Fiscal Year 2013 funds to perform a total of 695 projects that benefit the specialty crop industry. All the eligible entities with the exception the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands and the U.S. Virgin Islands submitted their applications by the established deadline of July 10, 2013. The approved awards are listed alphabetically. 2013 Project Delivery Types 134; 19% 2; 0% 559; 81% Competitive Grants Other State Programs State Program The proposal illustrated that the State department of agriculture planned to administer the project and/or a competitive grant program was not conducted. Competitive Grants The proposal demonstrated that a fair and open competition was conducted and the project partner(s) are clearly involved. Other The proposal illustrated that project partners met with the grantee to determine project priorities, but an open competitive grant program was not conducted. 2013 Project Types 104; 15% 159; 23% 42; 6% 54; 8% 108; 16% 45; 6% 183; 26% Education Food Safety Marketing & Promotion Other Pest & Plant Health Production Research Alabama Department of Agriculture and Industries Amount Awarded: $380,805.87 Number of Projects: 14 • Partner with the Alabama Cooperative Extension System (Talladega County) to increase small business opportunities for specialty crop producers by conducting workshops and demonstrations on -
T.D. ATF-370 Grape Variety Names for American Wines
522 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 5 / Monday, January 8, 1996 / Rules and Regulations Par. 5. In § 602.101, paragraph (c) is designations for American wines bottled FR 13623, March 31, 1982]. According amended by adding entries in numerical prior to January 1, 1997. Alternative to its charter, the Committee was to order to the table to read as follows: names listed at § 4.92(b) may be used as advise the Director of the grape varieties designations for American wines bottled and subvarieties which are used in the § 602.101 OMB Control numbers. prior to January 1, 1999. production of wine, to recommend * * * * * FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: appropriate label designations for these (c) * * * Charles N. Bacon, Wine, Beer, and varieties, and to recommend guidelines Spirits Regulations Branch, Bureau of for approval of names suggested for new Current OMB CFR part or section where control num- Alcohol, Tobacco and Forearms, 650 grape varieties. Their recommendations identified and described ber Massachusetts Avenue, NW, were restricted to grape names used in Washington, DC 20226; Telephone (202) the production of American wines. The 927±8230. Committee's final report, presented to ***** the Director in September 1984, 1.1221±2(d)(2)(iv) ................. 1545±1480 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: contained their findings regarding use of 1.1221±2(e)(5) ...................... 1545±1480 Background the most appropriate names for 1.1221±2(g)(5)(ii) .................. 1545±1480 domestic winegrapes varieties. ATF 1.1221±2(g)(6)(ii) .................. 1545±1480 The Federal Alcohol Administration Act 1.1221±2(g)(6)(iii) ................. 1545±1480 announced that the Committee's report Section 105(e) of the Federal Alcohol was available to the public in Notice No. -
MEASURES AFFECTING ALCOHOLIC and MALT BEVERAGES Report of the Panel Adopted on 19 June 1992
16 March 1992 UNITED STATES - MEASURES AFFECTING ALCOHOLIC AND MALT BEVERAGES Report of the Panel adopted on 19 June 1992 (DS23/R - 39S/206) 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 On 7 March and on 16 April 1991, Canada held consultations with the United States under Article XXIII:1 concerning measures relating to imported beer, wine and cider. The consultations did not result in a mutually satisfactory solution of these matters, and Canada requested the establishment of a GATT panel under Article XXIII:2 to examine the matter (DS23/2 of 12 April 1991). 1.2 At its meeting of 29-30 May 1991, the Council agreed to establish a panel and authorized the Council Chairman to designate the Chairman and members of the Panel in consultation with the parties concerned (C/M/250, page 35). 1.3 The terms of reference of the Panel are as follows: "To examine, in the light of the relevant GATT provisions, the matter referred to the CONTRACTING PARTIES by Canada in document DS23/2 and to make such findings as will assist the CONTRACTING PARTIES in making the recommendations or in giving the rulings provided for in Article XXIII:2." The parties subsequently agreed that the above terms of reference should include reference to documents DS23/1, DS23/2 and DS23/3 (DS23/4). 1.4 Pursuant to the authorization by the Council, and after securing the agreement of the parties concerned, the Chairman of the Council notified the following composition of the Panel on 8 July 1991 (DS23/4): Chairman: Mr. Julio Lacarte-Muro Members: Ms. -
Consuming Concerns
CONSUMING CONCERNS The 2013 State-by-State Report Card On Consumer Access To Wine Issued By The American Wine Consumer Coalition Washington, DC August 2013 INTRODUCTION The patchwork of state laws concerning wine and consumer access to wine products create a complex and difficult to understand legal quilt. This is due to the passage of the 21st Amendment to the Constitution in 1933 that not only ended the 15-year experiment with national alcohol Prohibition, but also gave primary responsibility to the states for the regulation of alcohol sales and consumption. The states took that responsibility seriously and enacted a variety of laws and regulations concerning how its residents could access and consume wine. Eighty years after passage of the 21st Amendment, many of the alcohol and wine-related laws put in place in the 1930s are still in place in most states, despite a cultural, economic and commercial reality that is starkly different from the 1930’s. In some cases, however, laws concerning how consumers may access wine products and use wine have been updated to match the economic changes that have occurred, to accommodate legal rulings that showed many of the earlier laws to be unconstitutional and to meet the demands of an American consumer base that has become fervently interested in the wines produced now in every state in the country as well as the thousands of imported wines that now reach American shores from Europe, South America, Canada, Eastern Europe, Africa, Australia, New Zealand and other spots on the globe. “Consuming Concerns: The 2013 State-by-State Report Card on Consumer Access to Wine” looks at how friendly the fifty states’ and District of Columbia’s wine laws are to its wine consumers. -
2017-Awri-Annual-Report.Pdf
Board members Ms L.E. Rose, BAppSc, BSc, GAICD Dr J.S. Harvey, BSc (Hons), PhD, Prof. K.D. Kirk, BSc (Hons), Ms E.A. Riley, BAppSc (Wine) Chair – Elected a member under MBA, GAICD PhD, DPhil Elected a member under Clause Clause 25.2 (c) of the Constitution Elected a member under Clause Elected a member under Clause 25.2 (b) of the Constitution 27.1 of the Constitution 25.2 (b) of the Constitution Mr T.J. Bekkers, BAppSc (Ag) (from 1 January 2017) Prof. B.P. Schmidt, AC, FAA, (Hons), Grad. Cert. (Mgt) Mr K.R. Horton, BAppSc FRS, BS (Astronomy), BS (Physics), Elected a member under Clause (Wine Science) Mr B.M. McKinnon, BAgSc AM (Astronomy), PhD 25.2 (c) of the Constitution Elected a member under Clause (Oenology) (Hons) Elected a member under Clause 25.2 (c) of the Constitution Elected a member under Clause 25.2 (b) of the Constitution Mr B. Bryant, BSc (Oenology) 25.2 (c) of the Constitution (until 31 December 2016) Elected a member under Clause Dr D.L. Johnson, BSc (Hons), (until 31 December 2016) 25.2 (c) of the Constitution (from PhD, MBA, GAICD Mr M.R. Watson, BEc, MBA, 1 January 2017) Ex officio under Clause 25.2 (a) of Dr S.C. McNab, BAgSc (Hons), PhD ACA, IPAA the Constitution as Managing Elected a member under Clause Elected a member under Clause Director of the AWRI 25.2 (c) of the Constitution 25.2 (b) of the Constitution The company The Australian Wine Research Institute Ltd was incorporated on 27 Passion April 1955. -
National Vintage 2020 Report
At a glance summary • The Australian winegrape crush for 2020 is estimated to be 1.52 million tonnes • The crush is 12 per cent below the 2019 harvest and 13 per cent below the 10-year average of 1.75 million tonnes • The average winegrape purchase price increased by 5 per cent to $694 per tonne • The total estimated value of the crush decreased by 9 per cent from $1.17 billion in 2019 to $1.07 billion, with the reduction in crush partly compensated for by the increase in average value • South Australia was the largest contributor with 47 per cent of the national crush, followed by NSW (32 per cent) and Victoria (17 per cent) • The largest individual region was the South Australian Riverland, accounting for 34 per cent of the national vintage, followed by Murray Darling–Swan Hill in Vic/NSW (25 per cent) and Riverina NSW (20 per cent) • Red varieties overall were down by 11 per cent while white varieties were down by 13 per cent National • Shiraz was the largest variety with a crush of 376,000 tonnes, accounting for 25 per cent of the total crush – an increase in share of one percentage point • Chardonnay was the second largest variety overall and largest white variety with 285,000 tonnes but declined Vintage by two precentage points to 19 per cent and reduced its share of the total crush • Of the top 10 red varieties, Merlot and Mataro/Mourvèdre declined the most, while Durif, Ruby Cabernet and Petit Report Verdot all increased slightly against the general trend • Of the top 10 white varieties, Riesling and Chardonnay declined the most, while Prosecco and Pinot Gris/Grigio 2020 were the only two that did not decline. -
SCBGP-FB (08FB- 12) Description of Funded Projects
Fruit and Vegetable Programs Specialty Crop Block Grant Program Fiscal Year 2013 Description of Funded Projects The fifty States, the District of Columbia, and five U.S. Territories were awarded Fiscal Year 2013 funds to perform a total of 694 projects that benefit the specialty crop industry. All the eligible entities with the exception of the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands and the U.S. Virgin Islands submitted their applications by the established deadline of July 10, 2013. The approved awards are listed alphabetically. 2013 Project Delivery Types 130; 19% 3; 0% 561; 81% Competitive Grants Other State Programs State Program The proposal illustrated that the State department of agriculture planned to administer the project and/or a competitive grant program was not conducted. Competitive Grants The proposal demonstrated that a fair and open competition was conducted and the project partner(s) are clearly involved. Other The proposal illustrated that project partners met with the grantee to determine project priorities, but an open competitive grant program was not conducted. 2013 Project Types 104; 15% 159; 23% 42; 6% 54; 8% 108; 16% 45; 6% 182; 26% Education Food Safety Marketing & Promotion Other Pest & Plant Health Production Research Alabama Department of Agriculture and Industries Amount Awarded: $380,805.87 Number of Projects: 14 • Partner with the Alabama Cooperative Extension System (Talladega County) to increase small business opportunities for specialty crop producers by conducting workshops and demonstrations