DOCSLIB.ORG

Desert Quartzite Final EISEIR Appendix P DQ Class III Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Desert Quartzite Final EISEIR Appendix P DQ Class III Report DESERT QUARTZITE SOLAR PROJECT FINAL PLAN AMENDMENT/ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT/ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT APPENDIX P CLASS III ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REPORT (see PDF files on enclosed CD) Class III Archaeological Survey of the Desert Quartzite Solar Project, Palo Verde Mesa, Riverside County, California Edited by Michael K. Lerch, Patrick B. Stanton, and Karen K. Swope Contributions by Dean M. Duryea, Jr., Scott H. Kremkau, Michael K. Lerch, Tim M. Mills, Patrick B. Stanton, Mark Q. Sutton, Karen K. Swope, Carly Whelan, and Jason D. Windingstad Screen check final report prepared for George E. Kline, Archaeologist Bureau of Land Management Palm Springs–South Coast Field Office 1201 Bird Center Drive Palm Springs, CA 92262 Technical Report 15-36 Statistical Research, Inc. Redlands, California Class III Archaeological Survey of the Desert Quartzite Solar Project, Palo Verde Mesa, Riverside County, California Edited by Michael K. Lerch, Patrick B. Stanton, and Karen K. Swope Contributions by Dean M. Duryea, Jr., Scott H. Kremkau, Michael K. Lerch, Tim M. Mills, Patrick B. Stanton, Mark Q. Sutton, Karen K. Swope, Carly Whelan, and Jason D. Windingstad Screen check final report prepared for George E. Kline, Archaeologist Bureau of Land Management Palm Springs–South Coast Field Office 1201 Bird Center Drive Palm Springs, CA 92262 Technical Report 15-36 Statistical Research, Inc. Redlands, California January 2016 CONTENTS List of Figures .............................................................................................................................................. ix List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................... xi Abstract ...................................................................................................................................................... xiii Acknowledgments ....................................................................................................................................... xv 1. Introduction, by Michael K. Lerch and Scott H. Kremkau ............................................................... 1.1 Project Location .................................................................................................................................. 1.1 Project Description .............................................................................................................................. 1.4 Applicable Regulations ....................................................................................................................... 1.4 APE Definitions .................................................................................................................................. 1.4 Direct APE .................................................................................................................................... 1.5 Indirect APE ................................................................................................................................. 1.5 Personnel Qualifications ...................................................................................................................... 1.6 Organization of the Report .................................................................................................................. 1.7 2. Background Information, by Scott H. Kremkau, Tim M. Mills, Mark Q. Sutton, Carly Whelan, Karen K. Swope, Jason D. Windingstad, and Michael K. Lerch ................................................... 2.1 Environmental Setting ......................................................................................................................... 2.1 Geology ......................................................................................................................................... 2.1 Flora .............................................................................................................................................. 2.2 Fauna ............................................................................................................................................. 2.3 Cultural Setting .................................................................................................................................... 2.7 Prehistoric Background ................................................................................................................. 2.7 The Paleoindian Period (12,000–8500 B.P.) ........................................................................... 2.7 The Archaic Period (8500–1500 B.P.) .................................................................................... 2.7 The Patayan Period (1500–200 B.P.) ...................................................................................... 2.8 Ethnographic Background ................................................................................................................... 2.9 Ethnographic Sources from the Colorado Desert.......................................................................... 2.9 Academic Studies ................................................................................................................... 2.9 Land Management Studies ................................................................................................... 2.11 The Cahuilla ................................................................................................................................ 2.12 Settlement and Subsistence .................................................................................................. 2.12 Sociopolitical Organization .................................................................................................. 2.12 Material Culture ................................................................................................................... 2.13 Houses and Other Structures .......................................................................................... 2.13 Hunting and Gathering Implements ............................................................................... 2.13 Baskets, Pottery, and Steatite Vessels ............................................................................ 2.13 Miscellaneous Implements ............................................................................................. 2.13 Trade and Conflict ................................................................................................................ 2.14 Worldview and Ritual Practice ............................................................................................. 2.14 The Chemehuevi ......................................................................................................................... 2.14 Settlement and Subsistence .................................................................................................. 2.15 Sociopolitical Organization .................................................................................................. 2.16 Material Culture ................................................................................................................... 2.16 Houses and Other Structures .......................................................................................... 2.16 iii Hunting, Gathering, and Farming Implements .............................................................. 2.16 Baskets and Pottery ........................................................................................................ 2.16 Trade and Conflict ................................................................................................................ 2.17 Worldview and Ritual Practice ............................................................................................. 2.17 The Mojave ................................................................................................................................. 2.18 Subsistence and Settlement .................................................................................................. 2.18 Sociopolitical Organization .................................................................................................. 2.19 Material Culture ................................................................................................................... 2.19 Houses and Other Structures .......................................................................................... 2.19 Hunting, Fishing, Farming, and Gathering Implements ................................................ 2.19 Baskets and Pottery ........................................................................................................ 2.20 Trade and Conflict ................................................................................................................ 2.20 Worldview and Ritual Practice ............................................................................................. 2.20 The Halchidhoma ........................................................................................................................ 2.21 Subsistence and Settlement .................................................................................................. 2.21 Sociopolitical Organization .................................................................................................. 2.21 Material Culture ..................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The 31St Annual Wildflower Hotline, Brought to You by the Theodore
    Welcome to the 31st Annual Wildflower Hotline, brought to you by the Theodore Payne Foundation, a non-profit plant nursery, seed source, book store, and education center dedicated to the preservation of wildflowers and California native plants. This a report for March 15, 2013. New reports will be posted each Friday through the end of May. The alternating warm weather and rain events have encouraged more blooms to come out in some of our favorite places. There were nice reports this week from the mountains and inland valleys of Orange and Riverside counties. Wildflowers are in bloom at Harford Springs Preserve in Western Riverside County mostly in the southern part of the park. California poppies (Eschscholzia californica) are blooming in large patches on several hillsides with California bells (Phacelia minor) and California figwort (Scrophularia californica) spotting the landscape among the rocks and boulders. Forget-me-nots (Cryptantha spp.), popcorn flowers (Plagiobothrys spp.) and California sun cup (Camissoniopsis bistorta) are plentiful beside the trails. Chia (Salvia columbariae) is abundant but shorter in stature this year. Chocolate lillies (Fritillaria biflora) are starting to bloom next to junipers along the grassy slopes near Ida Leona Road. Cream cups (Platystemmon californicus) are small this year, but patchy in the landscape in little swales. Oak gooseberry (Ribes quercertorum), hoary- leaved (Ceanothus crassifolius), and wild cucumber (Marah macrocarpa) are the major perennials in bloom. There are a few small patches of baby blue-eyes (Nemophila menziesii) in the shade of the magnificent junipers this park is famous for. Baby blue-eyes (Nemophila menziesii). Photo by Michael Charters Traveling west across the valley to the Santa Rosa Plateau Ecological Reserve, the Clinton Keith Road that brings you to the Plateau is stunning with hoary-leaf ceanothus (Cenothus crassifolius) in peak bloom.
    [Show full text]
  • THE JEPSON GLOBE a Newsletter from the Friends of the Jepson Herbarium
    THE JEPSON GLOBE A Newsletter from the Friends of The Jepson Herbarium VOLUME 26 NUMBER 1, Spring 2016 Curator’s Column: Museomics The Jepson Manual: Vascular Reveals Secrets of the Dead Plants of California, Second By Bruce G. Baldwin Edition: Supplement III Over the last decade, herbaria By Bruce G. Baldwin have received well-deserved public- The latest set of revisions to The Jep- ity as treasure troves of undiscovered son Manual, second edition (TJM2) and biodiversity, with the recognition that the Jepson eFlora was released online most “new” species named in the last in December 2015. The rapid pace of half-century have long resided in col- discovery and description of vascular lections prior to their detection and plant taxa that are new-to-science for original description. The prospect also California and the rarity and endanger- has emerged for unlocking the secrets of ment of most of those new taxa have plants and other organisms that no lon- warranted prioritization of revisions ger share our planet as living organisms that incorporate such diversity — and and, sadly, reside only in collections. Map of California, split apart to show newly introduced, putatively aggressive Technological advances that now al- the Regions of the Jepson eFlora. invasives — so that detection of such low for DNA sequencing on a genomic Source: Jepson Flora Project. plants in the field and in collections scale also are well suited for studying Regional dichotomous keys now is not impeded. The continuing taxo- old, highly degraded specimens, as re- nomic reorganization of genera and, to cent reconstruction of the Neanderthal available for the Jepson eFlora some extent, families in order to reflect genome has shown.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX D Biological Technical Report
    APPENDIX D Biological Technical Report CarMax Auto Superstore EIR BIOLOGICAL TECHNICAL REPORT PROPOSED CARMAX AUTO SUPERSTORE PROJECT CITY OF OCEANSIDE, SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: EnviroApplications, Inc. 2831 Camino del Rio South, Suite 214 San Diego, California 92108 Contact: Megan Hill 619-291-3636 Prepared by: 4629 Cass Street, #192 San Diego, California 92109 Contact: Melissa Busby 858-334-9507 September 29, 2020 Revised March 23, 2021 Biological Technical Report CarMax Auto Superstore TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 3 SECTION 1.0 – INTRODUCTION ................................................................................... 6 1.1 Proposed Project Location .................................................................................... 6 1.2 Proposed Project Description ............................................................................... 6 SECTION 2.0 – METHODS AND SURVEY LIMITATIONS ............................................ 8 2.1 Background Research .......................................................................................... 8 2.2 General Biological Resources Survey .................................................................. 8 2.3 Jurisdictional Delineation ...................................................................................... 9 2.3.1 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Jurisdiction .................................................... 9 2.3.2 Regional Water Quality
    [Show full text]
  • JOHNSTONELLA ANGELICA (I.M.Johnston) Hasen- Tubercles (Fig
    NOTEWORTHY COLLECTIONS Authors: Simpson, Michael G., Stephens, Jillian, and Yang, Stella Source: Madroño, 67(1) : 5-8 Published By: California Botanical Society URL: https://doi.org/10.3120/0024-9637-67.1.5 BioOne Complete (complete.BioOne.org) is a full-text database of 200 subscribed and open-access titles in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Complete website, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/terms-of-use. Usage of BioOne Complete content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non - commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. Downloaded From: https://bioone.org/journals/Madroño on 25 Apr 2020 Terms of Use: https://bioone.org/terms-of-use Access provided by California Botanical Society MADRONO˜ , Vol. 67, No. 1, pp. 5–8, 2020 NOTEWORTHY COLLECTIONS CALIFORNIA J. inaequata have acute, sharp-edged (‘‘knife-like’’) margins and, as is common in the genus, whitish JOHNSTONELLA ANGELICA (I.M.Johnston) Hasen- tubercles (Fig. 2). However, the fruit sizes of the two stab & M.G.Simpson [Cryptantha angelica I.M.John- species are quite different. Johnstonella angelica has ston] (BORAGINACEAE). —San Diego Co., a fruiting calyx usually 2–2.1(2.5) mm long, with the Borrego Springs, Steele/Burnand Anza-Borrego De- large (odd) nutlet generally 0.9–1.2 mm long and the sert Research Center, at Tilting T Drive, near south small, consimilar ones generally 0.6–0.8 long (Simp- entrance, east of fence, adjacent to old dirt road son, unpublished data; see Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Flora and Vegetation of the Mohawk Dunes, Arizona, Felger, Richard Stephen
    FLORA AND VEGETATION OF THE MOHAWK DUNES, ARIZONA Richard Stephen Felger Dale Scott Turner Michael F. Wilson Drylands Institute The Nature Conservancy Drylands Institute 2509 North Campbell, #405 1510 E. Fort Lowell 2509 North Campbell, #405 Tucson, AZ 85719, U.S.A. Tucson, AZ 85719, U.S.A. Tucson, AZ 85719, U.S.A. [email protected] ABSTRACT One-hundred twenty-two species of seed plants, representing 95 genera and 35 families are docu- mented for the 7,700 ha Mohawk Dune Field and its immediate surroundings, located in Yuma County, Arizona, USA. Three major habitats were studied: dunes, adjacent sand flats, and playa. The dunes (including interdune swales) support 78 species, of which 13 do not occur on the adjacent non-dune habitats. The adjacent non-dune habitats (sand flats and playa) support 109 species, of which 43 were not found on the dunes. The total flora has 81 annual species, or 66% of the flora. The dune flora has 63 annual (ephemeral) species, or 81% of the flora—one of the highest percentages of annuals among any regional flora. Of these dune annuals, 53 species (84%) develop during the cool season. No plant taxon is endemic to the Mohawk region. There are 8 dune, or sand adapted, endemics— Cryptantha ganderi, Dimorphocarpa pinnatifida, Dicoria canescens, Ditaxis serrata, Pleuraphis rigida, Psorothamnus emoryi, Stephanomeria schottii, Tiquilia plicata—all of which are found on nearby dune systems. Two of them (C. ganderi and S. schottii) are of limited distribution, especially in the USA, and have G2 Global Heritage Status Rank. There are four non-native species in the dune flora (Brassica tournefortii, Mollugo cerviana, Sonchus asper, Schismus arabicus), but only Brassica and Schismus seem to pose serious threats to the dune ecosystem at this time.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 4.12 Biological Resources
    SECTION 4.12 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 4.12 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES This section provides a background discussion of the regulatory framework and the affected environment. The regulatory framework discussion focuses on the federal, state, and local regulations that apply to plants, animals and sensitive habitats. The affected environment discussion focuses on the topography and soils, general vegetation, general wildlife, sensitive biological resources, riparian habitat and sensitive natural communities, jurisdictional waters, habitat connectivity and wildlife corridors. Information contained in this section is summarized from the Biological Technical Report for the Campo Verde Solar Energy Project prepared by Heritage Environmental Consultants, Inc., (Heritage, 2012).The Biological Technical Report (BTR) includes various attachments (Vegetation Mapbook, ACOE/CDFG Potentially Jurisdictional Waters Mapbook) and two appendices (Burrowing Owl Survey Report and Jurisdictional Waters). The Biological Technical Report and its attachments and appendices are provided on the attached CD of Technical Appendices as Appendix J of this EIR. 4.12.1 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK A. FEDERAL Endangered Species Act Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 United States Code [USC] 1531–1544), as amended (ESA), protects federally listed threatened and endangered species from unlawful take. “Take” under ESA includes activities such as “harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect, or to attempt to engage in any such conduct.” The United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) regulations define harm to include some type of “significant habitat modification or degradation.” Section 7 of the ESA requires the BLM, as a federal agency, to ensure that any action authorized, funded, or carried out by the BLM is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of listed species or modify their critical habitat.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant List Lomatium Mohavense Mojave Parsley 3 3 Lomatium Nevadense Nevada Parsley 3 Var
    Scientific Name Common Name Fossil Falls Alabama Hills Mazourka Canyon Div. & Oak Creeks White Mountains Fish Slough Rock Creek McGee Creek Parker Bench East Mono Basin Tioga Pass Bodie Hills Cicuta douglasii poison parsnip 3 3 3 Cymopterus cinerarius alpine cymopterus 3 Cymopterus terebinthinus var. terebinth pteryxia 3 3 petraeus Ligusticum grayi Gray’s lovage 3 Lomatium dissectum fern-leaf 3 3 3 3 var. multifidum lomatium Lomatium foeniculaceum ssp. desert biscuitroot 3 fimbriatum Plant List Lomatium mohavense Mojave parsley 3 3 Lomatium nevadense Nevada parsley 3 var. nevadense Lomatium rigidum prickly parsley 3 Taxonomy and nomenclature in this species list are based on Lomatium torreyi Sierra biscuitroot 3 western sweet- the Jepson Manual Online as of February 2011. Changes in Osmorhiza occidentalis 3 3 ADOXACEAE–ASTERACEAE cicely taxonomy and nomenclature are ongoing. Some site lists are Perideridia bolanderi Bolander’s 3 3 more complete than others; all of them should be considered a ssp. bolanderi yampah Lemmon’s work in progress. Species not native to California are designated Perideridia lemmonii 3 yampah with an asterisk (*). Please visit the Inyo National Forest and Perideridia parishii ssp. Parish’s yampah 3 3 Bureau of Land Management Bishop Resource Area websites latifolia for periodic updates. Podistera nevadensis Sierra podistera 3 Sphenosciadium ranger’s buttons 3 3 3 3 3 capitellatum APOCYNACEAE Dogbane Apocynum spreading 3 3 androsaemifolium dogbane Scientific Name Common Name Fossil Falls Alabama Hills Mazourka Canyon Div. & Oak Creeks White Mountains Fish Slough Rock Creek McGee Creek Parker Bench East Mono Basin Tioga Pass Bodie Hills Apocynum cannabinum hemp 3 3 ADOXACEAE Muskroot Humboldt Asclepias cryptoceras 3 Sambucus nigra ssp.
    [Show full text]
  • Amargosa River Expert Bioblitz April 7-9 , 2017 Final Report
    Amargosa River Expert BioBlitz April 7-9th, 2017 Final Report Photo credit: Janine Knapp Please cite this document as: Parker, S.S., B.S. Cohen, N. Fraga, B. Brown, J. Cole, W. Chatfield-Taylor, K. Guadalupe, G.B. Pauly, D. Cooper, and M. Ordeñana. 2017. Amargosa River Expert BioBlitz. Unpublished Report. The Nature Conservancy. Los Angeles, California. 50 pp. ii Report Contributors: Sophie S. Parker The Nature Conservancy [email protected] Brian S. Cohen The Nature Conservancy [email protected] Naomi Fraga Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden [email protected] Brian Brown Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County [email protected] Jeffrey Cole Pasadena City College [email protected] Will Chatfield-Taylor [email protected] Kevin Guadalupe Nevada Department of Wildlife [email protected] Gregory B. Pauly Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County [email protected] Daniel Cooper Cooper Ecological Monitoring, Inc. [email protected] Miguel Ordeñana Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County [email protected] iii Acknowledgements We thank our agency partners at the Bureau of Land Management, particularly C. Otahal, who co-organized the Amargosa River BioBlitz. We also thank the Amargosa Conservancy for supporting the collection efforts, and private land owners B. Brown of China Ranch and S. Sorrells of Shoshone Village for hosting volunteers on their property. iv Table of Contents I. Introduction and Context: Amargosa Watershed Conservation .............................................. 1 II. What is an Expert BioBlitz? ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Plants
    YUMA PROVING GROUND FLORA LISTS Family Scientific name Common name ANNUALS Agavaceae Hesperocallis undulata Desert lily Sesuvium verrucosum Verrucose seapurslane Aizoaceae Trianthema portulacastrum Desert horsepurslane Amaranthus fimbriatus Fringed amaranth Amaranthus palmeri Carelessweed Amaranthaceae Tidestromia lanuginosa Wooly tidestromia Tidestromia oblongifolia Arizona honeysweet Bowlesia incana Hoary bowlesia Apiaceae Daucus pusillus American wild carrot Acourtia wrightii Brownfoot Ambrosia psilostachya Cuman ragweed Atrichoseris platyphylla Parachute plant Baccharis emoryi Emory's baccharis Baileya multiradiata Desert marigold Baileya pleniradiata Woolly desert marigold Calycoseris wrightii White tackstem Chaenactis carphoclinia Pebble pincushion Chaenactis stevioides Esteve's pincushion Dicoria canescens Desert twinbugs Erigeron divergens Spreading fleabane Evax verna Spring pygmy‐cudweed Geraea canescens Hairy desert sunflower Asteraceae Helianthus annuus Common sunflower Heterotheca subaxillaris Camphorweed Laennecia coulteri Coulter's horseweed Logfia arizonica Arizona cottonrose Malacothrix glabrata Smooth desert dandelion Monoptilon bellioides Mojave desert star Palafoxia linearis Desert spanish needles Pectis papposa Many‐bristle chinchweed Perityle emoryi Emory's rocklily Prenanthella exigua Brightwhite Psathyrotes ramosissima Velvet turtleback Rafinesquia neomexicana New Mexico plumeseed Senecio mohavensis Mojave ragwort Stephanomeria exigua White plume wire lettuce Family Scientific name Common name Trichoptilium incisum
    [Show full text]
  • Final El Centro 1 Supplemental Environmental Stewardship Plan
    APPENDIX A Biological Survey Report This page intentionally left blank BIOLOGICAL SURVEY REPORT EL CENTRO FENCE REPLACEMENT PROJECT Task Order 27 (Biological Portion) FME Contract: GS10F0070W March 2020 Prepared For: Paul Enriquez Acquisition, Real Estate, and Environmental Director Infrastructure Program Program Management Office Directorate U.S. Customs and Border Protection [email protected] This Page Left Intentionally Blank Table of Contents 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................ 1 2. Project Description ............................................................................................................................................. 1 3. Survey Methods ................................................................................................................................................. 1 3.1. Background ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 4. Site Assessments............................................................................................................................................... 2 5. Environmental Setting ........................................................................................................................................ 3 6. Biological Resources.........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory of Sensitive Species and Ecosystems in Utah, Endemic And
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
    [Show full text]
  • Cocopah Indian Tribe Colorado River
    Cocopah Indian Tribe Colorado River Restoration Project Final Report AWPF #08-156WPF Task #8 Submitted to: Arizona Water Protection Fund 3550 N Central Ave Phoenix, AZ 85012 February 2011 Prepared By: AWPF Colorado River Restoration Project Final Report (AWPF #08-156WPF) Table of Contents 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................1 2 Project Background ...........................................................................................................1 3 Contracting ........................................................................................................................2 3.1 Amendments .................................................................................................................2 3.2 Subcontracting ..............................................................................................................2 4 Overall Project Coordination (Task #3) ...........................................................................2 4.1 Deliverables ..................................................................................................................3 5 Site Description ..................................................................................................................3 5.1 Location ........................................................................................................................3 5.2 Climate .........................................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]