DOCSLIB.ORG

Regnineteenorglist.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Regnineteenorglist.Pdf Below is a list of organisations that submitted representations to the Site Allocations DPD Regulation 19 Consultation. To view these representations, please search the online database using the surname in the right-hand column. If you wish to view a paper copy of any of the representations submitted as part of the consultation then please contact Planning Policy (01483 743871 or [email protected]) to arrange a suitable time to visit Civic Offices. If you are unable to find a representation using the online database then please contact the team who will be happy to assist. Organisation Searchable Name Bell Cornwell LLP on behalf of Octagon Developments Ltd Brake_C, Brake_C2 Bell Cornwell LLP on behalf of SJR KMN Woking LLP Alexander_L Bell Cornwell LLP on behalf of Woodham Court Lawrence_Bright_T landowners Byfleet Residents Neighbourhood Forum Chapples_G2 Byfleet Residents Petition Syrett_F2, Syrett_F3, Syrett_F4, Syrett_F5 Byfleet, West Byfleet and Pyrford Residents Association Grimshaw_A Camphill Club De_Netto_M Carter Jonas for Burhill Developments Ltd Gregson_K, Gregson_K1, Gregson_K2, Gregson_K3 Carter Jonas on behalf of Burhill Developments Ltd Wilkinson_R, Wilkinson_R2, Wilkinson_R3, Wilkinson_R4, Wilkinson_R5, Wilkinson_R6, Wilkinson_R7, Wilkinson_R8, Wilkinson_R9, Wilkinson_R10, Wilkinson_R11, Wilkinson_R12, Wilkinson_R13, Wilkinson_R14, Wilkinson_R15, Wilkinson_R16, Wilkinson_R17, Wilkinson_R18, Wilkinson_R19, Wilkinson_R20, Wilkinson_R21, Wilkinson_R22, Wilkinson_R23 Carter Jonas on behalf of EcoWorld Taylor_N1, Taylor_N2, Taylor_N3, Taylor_N4 Carter Jonas on behalf of Royal Mail Wilkinson_R24, Wilkinson_R25, Wilkinson_R26, Wilkinson_R27, Wilkinson_R28, Wilkinson_R29 Chartplan (2004) Ltd on behalf of Webb South East and Kitcherside_B Surrey County Council Childs and Co on behalf of Woodsted Properties Ltd Childs_P1, Childs_P2, Childs_P3, Childs_P4 Congregation of St Mary's Church, Byfleet McCabe_J4 Elmbridge Borough Council Elmbridge_BC Environment Agency Green_S, Green_S2, Green_S3, Green_S4, Green_S5, Green_S6, Green_S7, Green_S8, Green_S9, Green_S10, Green_S11, Green_S12, Green_S13, Green_S14, Green_S15, Green_S16, Green_S17, Green_S18, Green_S19, Green_S20,Green_S21, Green_S22, Green_S23, Green_S24, Green_S25, Green_S26, Green_S27 Erimax on behalf of Hook Heath Residents' Association Dare_J1, Dare_J2 Firstplan Ltd on behalf of Day Group Ltd Walsh_V, Walsh_V1, Walsh_V2, Walsh_V3, Walsh_V4, Walsh_V5, Walsh_V6, Walsh_V7, Walsh_V8, Walsh_V9, Walsh_V10 Form Architecture Planning Uttley_P, Uttley_P2, Uttley_P3 Gillings Planning on behalf of Churchgate Services Gillings_A, Gillings_A2, Gillings_A3, Gillings_A4, Gillings_A5, Gillings_A6 Gladman Developments Ltd Agnew_R Grant Consulting on behalf of Rutland Ltd Grant_A, Grant_A2 Guildford Borough Council Stonham_G Haskins Garden Centres Ltd Davidson_M, Davidson_M1, Davidson_M2 Heathlands Ward Ashall_S, Ashall_S1 Highways England Beata_G Historic England Byrne_A Hoe Valley Residents Forum Shatwell_R3 Horsell Common Preservation Society Hoyle_R Indigo Planning Ltd on behalf of McKay Securities Plc Sharland_K Leigh Place Properties Ltd Bocking_P Mayford Village Society Evans_E Natural England James_J Network Rail Stamp_E, Stamp_E2 Pegasus Group on behalf of Anchor Hanover Group Rainey_J, Rainey_J2 Peter Brett Associates on behalf of West Estates Ltd Greep_B, Greep_B2 Phoenix Cultural Centre McGinty_E, McGinty_E2 Pyrford Green Belt Action Group Carolin_J Pyrford Neighbourhood Forum Geaves_G3 Rapleys on behalf of Axis Land Partnership Asson_H Runnymede Borough Council Pacey_G Savills on behalf of GolDev Woking Ltd Collins_C, Collins_C2, Collins_C3, Collins_C4, Collins_C5, Collins_C6, Collins_C7 Savills on behalf of Martin Grant Homes Mountford_J9, Mountford_J10, Mountford_J11 Savills on behalf of Martin Grant Homes Mountford_J, Mountford_J2, Mountford_J3, Mountford_J4, Mountford_J5, Mountford_J6, Mountford_J7, Mountford_J8 SGN (gas network operator) McClafferty_I South Ridge Development LLP Stephen_B, Stephen_B1 Sport England Owen_N Strutt and Parker on behalf of West Hall Ltd Vashi_B Surrey County Council Harrison_K Surrey Nature Partnership Waite_M Surrey Wildlife Trust Waite_M Terence O'Rourke Ltd on behalf of McLaren Technology Southgate_T, Southgate_T1, Southgate_T2, Southgate_T3, Southgate_T4, Southgate_T5, Southgate_T6, Group Ltd Southgate_T7, Southgate_T8 Thakeham Homes Ltd Onuh_J, Onuh_J1 Thames Water Utilities Ltd Hurley_T, Hurley_T1 Thameswey Group Owen_S, Owen_S2, Owen_S3, Owen_S4, Owen_S5, Owen_S6, Owen_S7 Turley on behalf of Cala Homes Palmer_D, Palmer_D2 Turley on behalf of CEPF II (Woking) Ltd McFarland_M1, McFarland_M2 Turley on behalf of Taylor Wimpey UK Ltd Home_P, Home_P2, Home_P3, Home_P4, Home_P5, Home_P6, Home_P7 Turley on behalf of The Harrison Family McFarland_M3, McFarland_M4, McFarland_M5, McFarland_M6, McFarland_M7 Union 4 Planning on behalf of Coplan Estates Fidgett_S , Fidgett_S2 Waverley Borough Council Parrott_G West Byfleet Infant School Woods_A1 West Byfleet Neighbourhood Forum Pollard_W Westfield Common Residents Association Corney_B Woking Chamber of Commerce Stevens_M Wokingham Borough Council McCabe_J, McCabe_J1, McCabe_J2 Wood Plc on behalf of National Grid Bevins_H .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Woking Borough Council Local Development Documents
    Woking Borough Council Local Development Documents Annual Monitoring Report 2017-2018 December 2018 Produced by the Planning Policy Team For further information please contact: Planning Policy, Woking Borough Council, Civic Offices, Gloucester Square, Woking, Surrey, GU21 6YL. Email: [email protected] 1 Planning Services Vision: A high performing, customer focussed service that delivers a safe, high quality sustainable Woking 2 Contents 4. Headline information 6. Introduction 7. Woking in context 9. Spatial vision of Woking from the Core Strategy 2027 10. Progress on preparing a planning policy framework and Neighbourhood Plans 13. Part A – Well designed homes 28. Part B – Commercial and employment development 39. Part C – Improving access to key services, facilities and jobs 46. Part D – Provision of community infrastructure 55. Part E – Community benefits 58. Part F – Biodiversity and nature 71. Part G – Protecting heritage and conservation 73. Part H – Climate change and sustainable construction 80. Appendix 1 – Dwelling completions, 2017/18 83. Appendix 2 – Dwellings granted planning permission, 2017/18 3 Headline information A. Well designed homes Housing completions within the Borough continue to be above target, with 345 net completions in the reporting year. The most notable developments have taken place at Brookwood Farm and Moor Lane, the Hoe Valley Scheme and on a large office change of use project (Westminster Court, Hipley Street, Old Woking). 55% of completed dwellings were on previously developed land, 70% had two or more bedrooms, and 2.9% were of specialist housing. Only 9.5% of completions were of affordable housing, but £4,269,307 was received in planning obligations to be spent on affordable housing.
    [Show full text]
  • THE START of the NECROPLOLIS Iain Wakeford 2015
    ast January, in these articles, I started to look at the history of Woking in a way that most local history newspaper columns don’t (or cannot) now do. I wanted to get away from the normal superficial ‘peep’ into history and look a bit deeper at some L of the facts. For over thirty years I have been writing books and booklets about the history and heritage of Woking, so rather than just cobble together readers’ reminiscences’, I wanted to give my column some structure – to tell a more complete history of Woking (if a subject such as history can ever be complete). Starting with the geology and geography, I moved slowly onto the prehistoric before tackling the history of the area from the ‘Dark Ages’ onwards in an almost chronological order. Arthur Locke followed a similar approach many years ago, with readers cutting out and keeping his series of articles on ‘Woking Past’. At the end of last year we reached the 1840’s and 50’s and as well as looking at local chapels and schools, I touched upon the London Necropolis Company and Brookwood Cemetery (now owned by Woking Council). Over the next few months (if not years) I intend to tackle the subject of Woking ‘Past and Present’ in even more detail, beginning this week with a more detailed look at the Necropolis and why it came to Woking. THE START OF THE NECROPLOLIS Iain Wakeford 2015 The original plan for a cemetery on the whole of Woking n the first half of the 19th century the Common used Woking Station with private halts and But these new cemeteries themselves only had population of London had increased from chapels along the main line.
    [Show full text]
  • Farm Animals
    THE OFT-INFLATED PRICE OF PIGS (and other animals) Iain Wakeford 2014 he Woking area was always a mixed farming economy. As well as the fields of corn, animals played an important part in the daily lives of the local farmers, with cattle in the meadows, sheep grazing the commons and pigs in the orchards and T woods. Pigs at times appear to have out-numbered the human population (if the Domesday Book is to be believed), with even the poorest family managing to keep a pig or two. Pigs will eat almost anything, so were remarkably easy to keep, and practically every part of the pig could then be eaten, making them ideal for the poor tenants of the area. In 1573 John Maydman had six pigs in the wood at Brookwood – that is until the 28th June when John Mylles, a labourer from Woking stole them! He was indicted at the County Assizes the following March for ‘grand larceny’ (the pigs being valued at £1), but appears on this occasion to have escaped justice as he was described as being ‘at large’. At three shillings and four pence each, the value put on John Maydman’s pigs does seem to be remarkably high. In the same year Edward Matthewe of Woking died and in the inventory taken upon his death (exactly two months prior to Myles’ crime), he had ‘one small hogge’ worth just one shilling and four pence, although perhaps John Maydman’s pigs had fattened up by June! Inventories taken upon the death of local farmers prove that most kept a number of animals.
    [Show full text]
  • Normal Template
    CONSULTATION STATEMENT STATEMENT OF COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT The Statement of Community Involvement has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 (as amended) Town and Country Planning (Local Planning)(England) Regulations 2012 1. Purpose and Background 1.1 The purpose of this document is to provide details about the consultation which has taken place prior to the publication of the Statement of Community Involvement (SCI) 2014. The requirements for the Council to prepare an SCI is set out in the 2004 Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004. The SCI is no longer subject to an examination. Therefore the approach taken by the Council to produce this document has been to follow the same regulations in place for Supplementary Planning Documents (SPD) in regard to public participation. 1.1 This Consultation Statement has been prepared in line with Regulation 12 (a) of the Town and Country Planning (Local Planning) (England) Regulations 2012, which states that, before a council adopts a Supplementary Planning Document (SPD), it must produce a statement setting out: i. the persons the local planning authority consulted when preparing the supplementary planning document; ii. a summary of the main issues raised by those persons; and iii. how those issues have been addressed in the supplementary planning document. 1.2 The Council has an existing Statement of Community Involvement (2011) which sets out how it will involve the community in its plan and policy-making process. This can be viewed on the Council’s website at: www.woking.gov.uk/planning/policy/ldf/sci/sciadopted.
    [Show full text]
  • 34/35 Guildford to Camberley Via Woking - Valid from Sunday, June 6, 2021 to Monday, September 20, 2021
    34/35 Guildford to Camberley via Woking - Valid from Sunday, June 6, 2021 to Monday, September 20, 2021 Monday to Friday - Guildford Friary Bus Station 34 34 35 35 1 34 1 35 2 34 2 35 1 35 2 34 2 34 1 35 2 35 1 34 2 34 1 34 35 2 35 1 34 34 35 34 34 34 34 35 1 St Johns Co-op -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Camberley Pembroke Broadway -- -- -- 0630 -- -- 0644 0702 -- -- -- 0712 0738 0748 0805 0819 -- -- 0910 30 47 10 1347 1410 1435 1452 Bagshot Square -- -- -- 0642 -- -- 0656 0713 -- -- -- 0727 0749 0804 0816 0834 -- -- 0921 41 58 21 1358 1421 1446 1503 Lightwater Clearsprings -- -- -- -- -- 0700 -- -- -- -- -- 0738 0757 -- -- -- 0905 0905 -- -- 06 -- 1406 -- -- 1511 Lightwater War Memorial -- 0605 -- 0650 -- 0704 0705 0720 -- 0720 0741 0743 0801 0813 0823 0842 0910 0910 0928 48 10 28 1410 1428 1453 1515 West End The Inn -- 0608 -- 0654 -- 0710 0711 0724 -- 0726 0745 0749 0805 0817 0827 0846 0914 0914 0932 52 14 32 1414 1432 1457 1519 Bisley Hen and Chickens -- 0612 -- 0658 -- 0715 0716 0727 -- 0731 0748 0755 0808 0821 0830 0850 0917 0917 0935 55 17 35 1417 1435 1500 1522 Knaphill Sainsbury's 0549 0618 -- 0706 -- 0726 0727 0734 -- 0747 0755 0806 0815 0832 0837 0901 0924 0924 0942 02 24 42 1424 1442 1507 1529 Knaphill Shops 0553 0622 -- 0711 -- 0734 0735 0739 -- 0755 0800 0811 0820 0837 0842 0906 0929 0929 0947 Then 07 29 47 past 1429 1447 1512 1534 at each St Johns Co-op 0600 0629 -- 0719 -- 0742 0744 0746 -- 0805 0807 0822 0827 0845 0849 0914 0936 0936 0954 these 14 36 54 hour 1436 1454 1519
    [Show full text]
  • Asset Register
    The data below is provided for information only. Although every effort has been made to ensure that it is accurate and up to date, it is produced without liability. To report an error, please contact [email protected] Updated: 02/10/2018 We are still awaiting confirmation of details fOR any incomplete records. Unique Asset Unique Property Reference Number Easting Northing Occupation Type Tenure Use Address Town Borough County Postcode Identity 10002421878 P537 500465.00 158498.00 Let Land and building Freehold Mixed 1 GUILDFORD ROAD WOKING WOKING SURREY GU22 7PX 200000200495 LE234/1867 500431.00 158294.00 Let Land and building Freehold Leisure / community 1 YORK ROAD WOKING WOKING SURREY GU22 7XH 100062335415 P533 498974.00 155971.00 Vacant Land only Freehold Open Space 10 ACRE FARM , SMARTS HEATH ROAD MAYFORD WOKING SURREY GU22 0NP 10000003358 LE1K/1835 499679.00 158588.00 Occupied by the local authority Land and building Freehold Industrial 11 MABEL STREET WOKING WOKING SURREY GU21 6NN 100062336629 LE167A/1802 502425.00 159341.00 Let Land and building Freehold Retail / residential 127 PRINCESS ROAD MAYBURY WOKING SURREY GU22 8ER 100062336630 LE167B/1801 502432.00 159341.00 Let Land and building Freehold Retail / residential 129 PRINCESS ROAD MAYBURY WOKING SURREY GU22 8ER 100062332214 P540 500562.00 158688.00 Let Land and building Freehold Retail 13 HIGH STREET WOKING WOKING SURREY GU21 6BL 100062336721 LE167C/1805 502437.00 159336.00 Let Land and building Freehold Retail / residential 131 PRINCESS ROAD MAYBURY WOKING SURREY
    [Show full text]
  • The Heritage of Woking
    THE HERITAGE OF WOKING An Historic Conservation Compendium (As Amended 2000) Historic Buildings Ancient Monuments Conservation Areas Historic Gardens PLANNING WOKJNG BOROUGH COUNCIL THE HERITAGE OF WOKING An Historic Conservation Compendium (As Amended 2000) Historic Buildings Ancient Monuments Conservation Areas Historic Gardens Planning Services Woking Borough Council Civic Offices Gloucester Square Woking Surrey CU21 1YL (01483)743443 C.L.FAIRLAMB Borough Planning Officer CONTENTS Commentary 1 List of Buildings of Architectural and Historic Significance 5 Appendix 1 - Local Plan Policies 2000 22 Appendix 2 - Existing Measures to Protect Listed Buildings 25 Appendix 3 - Guidance on the Retention of Locally Listed Buildings 28 Appendix 4 - Conservation Areas in Woking 30 Appendix 5 - Additional Planning Controls in Conservation Areas 85 Appendix 6 - Ancient Monuments in Woking 89 Appendix 7 - Historic Gardens/ Landscape in Woking 95 COMMENTARY 1.0 Introduction 3.3 Supplementary Planning Guidance has been produced by Woking Borough 1.1 Woking possesses many buildings of Council, including a conservation areas architectural and historic interest, as well leaflet, guidance on locally listed as conservation areas, forming part of its buildings, and background information in cultural heritage. Other components of the Planning Handbook. this heritage include ancient monuments, sites of archaeological 3.4 The Council will also be preparing significance, historic gardens, and areas guidance notes giving detailed design of historic landscape interest. All these and conservation advice for each aspects of Woking's history need individual conservation area. Also a appropriate protection for future photographic record and description of generations to enjoy. all Listed Buildings and structures is held by Planning Services at the Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning for the Future River Wey Flood Risk Management Draft Strategy 2010 Public Consultation Document We Are the Environment Agency
    planning for the future River Wey Flood Risk Management Draft Strategy 2010 Public consultation document We are the Environment Agency. It’s our job to look after your environment and make it a better place – for you, and for future generations. Your environment is the air you breathe, the water you drink and the ground you walk on. Working with business, Government and society as a whole, we are making your environment cleaner and healthier. The Environment Agency. Out there, making your environment a better place. Published by: Environment Agency Swift House Frimley Business Park Frimley GU16 7SQ Tel: 08708 506506 Email: [email protected] www.environment-agency.gov.uk © Environment Agency All rights reserved. This document may be reproduced with prior permission of the Environment Agency. The River Wey catchment This consultation document summarises the work carried out to investigate and manage strategic flood risk in the River Wey catchment. Our preferred option is to maintain the river system and structures to meet existing flood risk standards. These standards will decrease with time due to climate change. Flood risk is the combination of probability (likelihood) and consequence (impact). We will reduce the impacts of flooding by: enhancing our flood warning and forecasting ability, influencing development planning and promoting flood proofing measures in homes. In this document the River Wey catchment has been divided in to five areas known as ‘reaches’ these are shown on Map 1. Map 1 Wey Catchment Overall Map – 5 Reaches Reach 5 Reach 4 Reach 3 Reach 1 Reach 2 © Crown copyright. All rights reserved Environment Agency.
    [Show full text]
  • (Public Pack)Background Document 3
    Agenda Item 8 COUNCIL – 18 OCTOBER 2018 SITE ALLOCATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN DOCUMENT (DPD) SUPPLEMENTARY PAPER The following information had been drawn up in response to a question by Councillor Ann- Marie Barker. The following are sites proposed to be released from the Green Belt to enable the delivery of the Core Strategy up to 2027: Land south of Brookwood Lye Road, Brookwood (Policy GB1) Land at Five Acres, Brookwood Lye Road (Policy GB2) Nursery land adjacent to Egley Road, Mayford (Policy GB7) Land at west Hall, Parvis Road, West Byfleet (Policy GB13) Broadoaks, Parvis Road, West Byfleet (Policy GB14) The following sites are proposed to be released from the Green Belt and safeguarded for future development/green infrastructure needs beyond the Core Strategy period between 2027 and 2040: Land south of Parvis Road and High Road, Byfleet (Policy GB4) Land to the south of Rectory Lane, Byfleet (Policy GB5) Woking Garden centre, Egley Road, Mayford (Policy GB8) Land adjacent to Hook Hill Lane, Hook Heath (Policy GB 12). This site is safeguarded for Green Infrastructure and NOT for any other form of development. The following sites are identified for development or infrastructure improvements but will continue to remain within the Green Belt: Brookwood Cemetery, Cemetery Pales, Brookwood (Policy GB3) Six Crossroads roundabout and environs, Chertsey Road (Policy GB6) Woking Palace, Carter Lane, Old Woking (Policy GB20) The following sites have been identified as land for Suitable Alternative Natural Greenspace (SANG). They will continue to remain within the Green Belt and would be needed to support the delivery of the Core Strategy: Byfleet SANG, land to the south of Parvis Road, Byfleet (Policy GB15) Brookwood Farm SANG, adjacent to Brookwood Farm Drive, Brookwood (Policy GB16) Westfield Common SANG, land to the east of New Lane (Policy GB17) First SANG at Gresham Mill, High Street, Old Woking (Policy GB18) Second SANG at Gresham Mill, High Street, Old Woking (Policy GB19) Page 1 .
    [Show full text]
  • 5 December 2019 Questions to Council
    COUNCIL – 5 DECEMBER 2019 QUESTIONS TO COUNCIL – 5 DECEMBER 2019 The following questions have been received under Standing Order 8.1. The draft replies, which are subject to amendment, are set out below. “Councillors are thanked for their questions.” 1. Question from Councillor N Martin “I am sure the Leader will agree that the announcement by Tim Oliver Leader of Surrey County Council that they are going to relocate County Hall to Woking is great news. Please can the Leader outline what benefits this will bring to the residents of Woking?” Reply from Councillor D J Bittleston “The decision of Surrey County Council is most welcomed. It will be good for all of Surrey that it has its HQ within the administrative boundary and as Woking is central to its population, if not its geography, we are well placed for residents and businesses to engage with the County. I understand that the County, through its Agile Working policy, will base over a 1,000 employees at Midas House with the day to day occupancy being some 600. This is 600 more customers for Woking businesses. I believe that having the County Council located here will also attract other businesses and visitors to come to Woking as one job at a major employer often supports multiple additional jobs locally. The positive relationship we have already established with the County Council will also be enhanced by its local presence. To date we have worked successfully with it on;- town centre infrastructure securing £11m from EnterpriseM3 and being awarded £95m by the Government for the widening of Victoria Arch and improvements to the A320; the operation of our new Family Centres; creation, in part of the Library, of a new Mid Wife Centre which will open early next financial year; and joint work on supporting people to live independently in their own homes.
    [Show full text]
  • Goldwater Lodge, Wishbone Way, Woking, Surrey GU21 3RT 37
    Please reply to: 37 Willowmead Close Goldsworth Park Woking Surrey GU21 3DN Tel: 01483 714096 e-mail: [email protected] Cllrs Barker / Eastwood / Rana / Hunwicks / Kemp / Murray / Bittleston Woking Borough Council Civic Offices Gloucester Square Woking Surrey GU21 1YL 8th September 2016 Dear Councillor, Goldsworth Park Recreation Area –Landscaping Master Plan The Council will shortly receive the report of a consultants’ review of the Playing Pitch Strategy. This has involved consulting a variety of partners (primarily sports clubs, we believe) and National Governing Bodies about future club development needs and mapping these against the future demographic profile of the area. When the report is received, officers will make recommendations for the most appropriate locations for the development of new playing pitches and will consider Council land, including Goldsworth Park Recreation Ground, as well as third party land such as school playing fields. The Goldsworth Park Community Association (GPCA) is concerned that the review appears to be focused solely on the need for sports pitches; there is no indication that needs and views of residents and the nature of the land identified for development will be considered when officers make their recommendations. The GPCA supports the development of facilities for sports and recreation in general, but cannot support the construction of more sports pitches on the Goldsworth Park Recreation Ground. There are already seven football pitches, an area which can be used for cricket in season, two hockey pitches, a BMX trail, a basketball court, and an outdoor gym. The recreation ground would cease to be multi-functional if the wild area known as the North Meadow were to be levelled, mown and marked out for football pitches.
    [Show full text]
  • Starkie, Emily Dear Sir/Madam, This Response Sets out the Formal Views of Both the Woking Liberal Democrat Local
    Starkie, Emily From: William Forster Sent: 06 October 2014 19:03 To: Reviews@ Subject: Woking Borough Council Boundary Review Dear Sir/Madam, This response sets out the formal views of both the Woking Liberal Democrat local party and Liberal Democrat Group on Woking Borough Council. The Woking Lib Dems welcomes and supports most of the Local Government Boundary Commission for England's well reasoned proposals for the new ward boundaries for Woking Borough Council. However, we fully support the alternations on ward boundaries suggested in Woking Borough Council's submission and wish to propose some further minor changes to better reflect community identities. Please see the full details of the Lib Dem submission below, divided into two sections covering the south and north of Woking Borough. South Woking We strongly agree with the Council's proposal to include the area south of Moor Lane, including Rosebank Cottages and Bonners Close should be included in the Hoe Valley ward. This area has much better connectivity and community links with the Hoe Valley ward, especially Westfield, than it does with the communities in Heathlands. The local residents association, the Westfield Common Residents Association covers both sides of Moor Lane and the area around Westfield Common, therefore this change would ensure this natural community is solely contained within one ward. The local Lib Dems agree with the Council's recommendation that the area around Constitution Hill should be included in Mount Hermon, rather than Hoe Valley. This area has very similar characteristics with the rest of Mount Hermon. However, for the same reason of community identity, we wish to propose that the area around Claremont Avenue be removed from Hoe Valley and included in Mount Hermon.
    [Show full text]