DOCSLIB.ORG

Amendment No. 5 to Registration Statement on Form S-1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Amendment No. 5 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 Amendment No. 5 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1326801/000119312512208192... S-1/A 1 d287954ds1a.htm AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON FORM S-1 Table of Contents As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 3, 2012 Registration No. 333-179287 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 Amendment No. 5 to Form S-1 REGISTRATION STATEMENT Under The Securities Act of 1933 Facebook, Inc. (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 7370 20-1665019 (State or other jurisdiction of (Primary Standard Industrial (IRS Employer incorporation or organization) Classification Code Number) Identification No.) Facebook, Inc. 1601 Willow Road Menlo Park, California 94025 (650) 308-7300 (Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of Registrant’s principal executive offices) David A. Ebersman Chief Financial Officer Facebook, Inc. 1601 Willow Road Menlo Park, California 94025 (650) 308-7300 (Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service) Please send copies of all communications to: Gordon K. Davidson, Esq. Theodore W. Ullyot, Esq. William H. Hinman, Jr., Esq. Jeffrey R. Vetter, Esq. David W. Kling, Esq. Daniel N. Webb, Esq. James D. Evans, Esq. Michael L. Johnson, Esq. Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP Fenwick & West LLP Facebook, Inc. 2550 Hanover Street 801 California Street 1601 Willow Road Palo Alto, California 94304 Mountain View, California 94041 Menlo Park, California 94025 (650) 251-5000 (650) 988-8500 (650) 308-7300 Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable after the effective date of this Registration Statement. If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act, check the following box: ¨ If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ¨ If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ¨ If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ¨ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one): Large accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated filer ¨ Non-accelerated filer x (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company ¨ CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE Proposed Maximum Proposed Maximum Title of Each Class of Amount to be Offering Aggregate Amount of Securities to be Registered Registered(1) Price Per Share Offering Price(2) Registration Fee(3) 1 of 224 5/3/2012 3:40 PM Amendment No. 5 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1326801/000119312512208192... Class A Common Stock, $0.000006 par value 388,027,654 $35.00 $13,580,967,890 $1,556,379 (1) Estimated pursuant to Rule 457(a) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Includes additional shares that the underwriters have the option to purchase to cover over-allotments, if any. (2) Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the registration fee. (3) The Registrant previously paid $573,000 of this amount in connection with the initial filing of this Registration Statement. The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this Registration Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as the Securities and Exchange Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine. 2 of 224 5/3/2012 3:40 PM Amendment No. 5 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1326801/000119312512208192... Table of Contents The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. Neither we nor the selling stockholders may sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and neither we nor the selling stockholders are soliciting offers to buy these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted. PROSPECTUS (Subject to Completion) Issued May 3, 2012 337,415,352 Shares CLASS A COMMON STOCK Facebook, Inc. is offering 180,000,000 shares of its Class A common stock and the selling stockholders are offering 157,415,352 shares of Class A common stock. We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of shares by the selling stockholders. This is our initial public offering and no public market currently exists for our shares of Class A common stock. We anticipate that the initial public offering price will be between $28.00 and $35.00 per share. We have two classes of common stock, Class A common stock and Class B common stock. The rights of the holders of Class A common stock and Class B common stock are identical, except voting and conversion rights. Each share of Class A common stock is entitled to one vote. Each share of Class B common stock is entitled to ten votes and is convertible at any time into one share of Class A common stock. The holders of our outstanding shares of Class B common stock will hold approximately 96.3% of the voting power of our outstanding capital stock following this offering, and our founder, Chairman, and CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, will hold or have the ability to control approximately 57.3% of the voting power of our outstanding capital stock following this offering. We have applied to list our Class A common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “FB.” We are a “controlled company” under the corporate governance rules for NASDAQ-listed companies, and our board of directors has determined not to have an independent nominating function and instead to have the full board of directors be directly responsible for nominating members of our board. Investing in our Class A common stock involves risks. See “ Risk Factors ” beginning on page 12. PRICE $ A SHARE Underwriting Proceeds to Price to Discounts and Proceeds to Selling Public Commissions Facebook Stockholders Per share $ $ $ $ Total $ $ $ $ We and the selling stockholders have granted the underwriters the right to purchase up to an additional 50,612,302 shares of Class A common stock to cover over-allotments. The Securities and Exchange Commission and state regulators have not approved or disapproved of these securities, or determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense. The underwriters expect to deliver the shares of Class A common stock to purchasers on , 2012. MORGAN STANLEY J.P. MORGAN GOLDMAN, SACHS & CO. BofA MERRILL LYNCH BARCLAYS ALLEN & COMPANY LLC 3 of 224 5/3/2012 3:40 PM Amendment No. 5 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1326801/000119312512208192... CITIGROUP CREDIT SUISSE DEUTSCHE BANK SECURITIES RBC CAPITAL MARKETS WELLS FARGO SECURITIES , 2012 4 of 224 5/3/2012 3:40 PM Amendment No. 5 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1326801/000119312512208192... Table of Contents 5 of 224 5/3/2012 3:40 PM Amendment No. 5 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1326801/000119312512208192... Table of Contents 6 of 224 5/3/2012 3:40 PM Amendment No. 5 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1326801/000119312512208192... Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Page Prospectus Summary 1 Management 108 Risk Factors 12 Executive Compensation 116 Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements 35 Related Party Transactions 137 Industry Data and User Metrics 36 Principal and Selling Stockholders 140 Use of Proceeds 37 Description of Capital Stock 148 Dividend Policy 37 Shares Eligible for Future Sale 155 Capitalization 38 Material U.S. Federal Tax Considerations for Non-U.S. Dilution 41 Holders of Class A Common Stock 158 Selected Consolidated Financial Data 43 Underwriting 162 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Legal Matters 170 Condition and Results of Operations 46 Experts 170 Letter from Mark Zuckerberg 80 Where You Can Find Additional Information 170 Business 84 Index to Consolidated Financial Statements F-1 Neither we, nor the selling stockholders, nor the underwriters, have authorized anyone to provide any information or to make any representations other than those contained in this prospectus or in any free writing prospectuses we have prepared. We take no responsibility for, and can provide no assurance as to the reliability of, any other information that others may give you. We and the selling stockholders are offering to sell, and seeking offers to buy, shares of our Class A common stock only in jurisdictions where offers and sales are permitted. The information in this prospectus is accurate only as of the date of this prospectus, regardless of the time of delivery of this prospectus or any sale of shares of our Class A common stock.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Private Picture of Mark Zuckerberg's Family Leaked 27 December 2012, by Manuel Valdes
    Private picture of Mark Zuckerberg's family leaked 27 December 2012, by Manuel Valdes Randi Zuckerberg, who used to run Facebook's marketing department and now produces a reality television show, eventually said Schweitzer was able to see the picture because they had a mutual friend. Those tweets have since been taken down. Schweitzer declined to comment when reached by The Associated Press. Randi Zuckerberg didn't reply to a message via Twitter seeking comment. Randi Zuckerberg used the dustup to write about online sharing etiquette. "Digital etiquette: always ask permission before posting a friend's photo publicly. It's not about privacy settings, it's about human decency," she posted on Twitter. Randi Zuckerberg attends Seventh Annual Women Of But Randi Zuckerberg's comments sparked sharp Worth Awards at Hearst Tower on December 6, 2012 in reactions from people who thought the issue wasn't New York City. Facebook co-founder Mark Zuckerberg's about etiquette, but rather Facebook's often sister evidently tripped on the social network's privacy changing and often confusing privacy settings. settings, landing in the midst of a debate on Wednesday about "online etiquette." "The thing that bugged me about Randi Zuckerberg's response is that she used her name as a bludgeoning device. Not everyone has that. Even Mark Zuckerberg's family can get tripped up She used her position to get it taken it down," said by Facebook's privacy settings. A picture that Eva Galperin of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, Zuckerberg's sister posted on her personal a privacy advocacy group in San Francisco.
    [Show full text]
  • On Christmas 2012, Randi Zuckerberg Posted a Photo of Her Family to Her Private Facebook Page
    On Christmas 2012, Randi Zuckerberg posted a photo of her family to her private Facebook page. Unfortunately, the privacy settings on Facebook can confuse even the company’s top executives. Randi, the sister of Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg and a former senior Facebook executive, soon found that her photo had leaked to the general public and had been tweeted to thousands of people. Randi tweeted Callie Schweitzer, Director of Marketing at VOX Media, who had first posted the photo to Twitter: “Not sure where you got this photo. I posted it to friends only on FB. You reposting it to Twitter is way uncool.” This incident came only 11 days after Facebook had released new privacy controls meant to help Facebook users understand who is able to see the content they post. A new shortcuts toolbar allowed users to control “Who can see my stuff” without having to go to a new page. The new release also offered in-product education. Messages explained how content that users hide in their timelines could still appear in their news feed and on other pages. Evidently, these controls did not go far enough to protect Randi Zuckerberg’s privacy. In fact, since Facebook was launched, it has had ongoing issues with addressing the privacy concerns of its users. In late 2011, Facebook settled a suit filed by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) that charged Facebook with deceiving its customers about privacy issues since 2009. (The FTC regulates companies that take credit card information from consumers.) Facebook claimed that it would not share personal information with advertisers, that third-party applications would only be given the information they needed to function properly, that no one could access photos or videos from deleted accounts, and—perhaps most relevant to Randi Zuckerberg’s experience—that information posted to an individual’s Friends List would remain private.
    [Show full text]
  • Facebookfrom Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopediajump To: Navigation, Search This Article Is About the Website
    FacebookFrom Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaJump to: navigation, search This article is about the website. For the collection of photographs of people after which it is named, see Facebook (directory(directory).). Facebook, Inc. Type Private Founded Cambridge, MassachusettsMassachusetts[1][1] (2004 (2004)) Founder Mark Zuckerberg Eduardo Saverin Dustin Moskovitz Chris Hughes HeadquarterHeadquarterss Palo Alto, California, U.S., will be moved to MenMenlolo Park, California, U.S. in June 2011 Area served Worldwide Key people Mark Zuckerberg (CEO) Chris Cox (VP of Product) Sheryl Sandberg (COO) Donald E. Graham (Chairman) Revenue US$800 mmillionillion (2009 est.)[2] Net income N/A This website stores data such as cookies to enableEmployees essential 2000+(2011)[3] site functionality, as well as marketing, personalization,Website and analytics. facebook.com You may change your settings at any time or accept theIPv6 default support settings. www.v6.fawww.v6.facebook.comcebook.com Alexa rank 2 (Ma(Marchrch 2011[upda2011[update][4])te][4]) Privacy Policy Type of site Social networking service Marketing PersonalizationAdvertising Banner ads, referral marketing, casual games AnalyticsRegistration Required Save Accept All Users 600 million[5][6] (active in January 2011) Available in Multilingual Launched February 4, 2004 Current status Active Screenshot[show] Screenshot of Facebook's homepage Facebook (stylized facebook) is a social networking service and website launched in February 2004, operated and privately owned by Facebook, Inc.[1] As of January 2011[update], Facebook has more than 600 million active users.[5][6] Users may create a personal profile, add other users as friends, and exchange messages, including automatic notifications when they update their profile.
    [Show full text]
  • First Commerce and FSU College of Business Present Power Forward with Randi Zuckerberg
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: Kim Howes, Director of Marketing High-res photo of Zuckerberg available First Commerce Credit Union Please use hashtag: #PwrFwd (850) 294-2531 – cell / [email protected] First Commerce and FSU College of Business present Power Forward with Randi Zuckerberg Third annual event in Power Forward Speaker Series helps kick-off a variety of Entrepreneurship Month “eMonth” activities in November TALLAHASSEE, FL – First Commerce Credit Union and the FSU College of Business present the third annual event in the Power Forward Speaker Series on Wednesday, Nov. 4, at 3:30 p.m. This year’s event features Randi Zuckerberg, Founder & CEO of Zuckerberg Media, a New York Times bestselling author, host of “Dot Complicated,” and former Director of Marketing at Facebook. She is expected to speak to an audience of more than 900 at Ruby Diamond Concert Hall, including business owners and leaders, entrepreneurs, and students. For the second year, the kickoff event for Entrepreneurship Month will be moderated by Andy Serwer, editor-in-chief of Yahoo Finance. “In our 75th year as a local strong credit union, we continue to work to keep our business leaders inspired and cultivate entrepreneurism in our community – and we are proud that Power Forward has become Tallahassee’s largest business event in just 2 short years,” said Cecilia Homison, CEO of First Commerce. “Randi Zuckerberg helped change the way we connect, and she is now an entrepreneur in her own right.” “Florida State University has a new culture of embracing entrepreneurship, creativity and innovation across all disciplines and the College of Business is proud to be a leader in this effort,” said Michael D.
    [Show full text]
  • Or Individual Stocks?
    Ask the Fool 401(k) or Individual Stocks? Is investing in individual Qstocks through a broker- age account better than investing Fool’s School Ideally, you want a profit margin My Dumbest Investment The Motley Fool Take through a 401(k) account? — greater than those of competitors, and A.A., Salisbury, Maryland margins that are increasing. On the Sidelines Friend This Stock? Either can work well. You’ll Phil Fisher’s • “Does the company have out- Ahave more control and the 15 Points standing labor and personnel rela- My dumbest investment move Facebook (Nasdaq: FB) is huge, possibility of faster growth with tions?” Satisfied employees tend was not investing in the stock sporting a market value recently individual stocks, but that can also In his classic investing book to stick around and be productive; market after the financial crisis of north of $800 billion, and many be a riskier strategy, since one or “Common Stocks and Uncom- disgruntled ones, less so. 2007 to 2009. — Jimmy, online huge companies feature slower more stocks might severely disap- mon Profits” (Wiley, $25), Philip • “Are there other aspects of the The Fool Responds: You high- growth than smaller ones. But A. Fisher laid out “Fifteen Points light a major kind of mistake we Facebook’s revenue grew by a hefty point you. business, somewhat peculiar to the 22% in 2020 over year-ago levels, With a 401(k) account, your to Look for in a Common Stock.” industry involved, which will give all make sometimes — the mis- take of not doing something good, while operating income jumped investment choices will typically Decades later, these questions can the investor important clues as to 36%.
    [Show full text]
  • Internet Trends D11 Conference
    INTERNET TRENDS D11 CONFERENCE 5 / 29 / 2013 Mary Meeker / Liang Wu Outline • Key Internet Trends – Growth Continues • Re-Imagination – Being Re-Imagined & Uploaded • Mobile – Aggressive Momentum • Computing – Yet Another Platform Change… • Lots to Learn from China – Volume + Innovation • Most Enabled Entrepreneurs Ever? • So, You Want to Be a Public Company? • High-Skilled Immigration – Perspective • Appendix – Re-Imagination is Alive & Well – Traditional Industries Being Re-Imagined – USA, Inc. 2 KEY INTERNET TRENDS – GROWTH CONTINUES 3 2.4B Global Internet Users in 2012* – 8% Y/Y Growth*, Driven by Emerging Markets 2008-2012 Internet User 2012 Internet Population Rank Country Adds (MMs) Users (MMs) Y/Y Growth Penetration 1 China 264 564 10% 42% 2 India 88 137 26 11 3 Indonesia 39 55 58 23 4Iran 35 42 205 55 5 Russia 33 70 6 49 6 Nigeria 31 48 15 30 7 Philippines 28 34 32 35 8Brazil 27 88 6 45 9 Mexico 19 42 9 37 10 USA 18 244 3 78 11 Argentina 17 28 57 68 12 Egypt 17 30 11 38 13 Colombia 14 25 39 54 14 Turkey 13 35 17 47 15 Vietnam 12 31 7 35 Top 15 654 1,473 15% 34% World 902 2,406 8% 34% Note: *All data (except China) as of 6/12, 2.4B global Internet users and 8% Y/Y growth rate based on the latest available data. China Internet user data as of 12/12, per CNNIC. Source: United Nations / International Telecommunications Union, internetworldstats.com. 4 Material Upside for Mobile Ad Spend vs. Mobile Usage % of Time Spent in Media vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Care and Capitalist Crisis in Anglophone Digital Landscapes: the Case of the Mompreneur
    Care and capitalist crisis in anglophone digital landscapes: the case of the mompreneur Meredith Johnson Krueger A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts University of Washington 2015 Committee: Victoria Lawson Sarah Elwood-Faustino Luke R. Bergmann Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Geography © Copyright 2015 Meredith Johnson Krueger 1 University of Washington Abstract Care and capitalist crisis in anglophone digital landscapes: the case of the mompreneur Meredith J. Krueger Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Professor Victoria Lawson Department of Geography The term “mompreneur” has fallen into heavy usage in anglophone media since 2008. A mesh of two ideologically-loaded words, “mom” and “entrepreneur,” the mompreneur is frequently defined by the functional meaning of these two words, but in this thesis I develop a more specific definition and study her as a discursive figure located at a particular intersection of identities. I argue that the mompreneur is a normative ideal in anglophone techno-utopian discourses who structures emergent political-economic relations. I find that she is overwhelmingly constructed as a high-achieving, flexible, creative, multi-tasking “supermom” who makes use of digital information and communication technologies to run a business from home while maximizing quality time with her (biological) children. I ask, what does the mompreneur’s idealized lifestyle and its complementary narratives tell us about the reproduction of white supremacy, heteropatriarchy and capitalism in a colorblind, postfeminist techno-optimist context? What can she tell us about the governance of care amidst economic relations increasingly mediated through digital technology? I take the discourse of mompreneurship as a case study by which to analyze the production of gendered and entrepreneurial subjectivities in relation to capitalist crisis.
    [Show full text]
  • The Post Pandemic Task Force
    Z U C K E R B E R G I N S T I T U T E J A N U A R Y 2 0 2 1 THE POST PANDEMIC TASK FORCE I N C O L L A B O R A T I O N W I T H WOODBRIDGE, NJ About ZUCKERBERG INSTITUTE A B O U T U S ZUCKERBERG INSTITUTE and ZUCKERBERG MEDIA are dedicated to inspiring kids and adults to participate in the power of science, technology, and entrepreneurship. Aiming to change the face of innovation one new character, collaboration, and company at a time, Zuckerberg Media has partnered with media juggernauts Hulu, NBC/Universal, Sirius XM, and HarperCollins Publishers, among many others, to bring powerfully entertaining and inclusive stories to audiences all over the world. Its properties are seen on television in more than thirty countries around the world, and its latest initiatives reached audiences of more than 1B in 2017 alone. 0 1 Project Description Zuckerberg Institute in collaboration with The purpose of this project is to expand Woodbridge Township propose to programs that provide youth with implement the Post Pandemic Task Force academic enrichment opportunities, as with local high school students and small well as additional activities designed to businesses affected by COVID. This complement students regular academic program is an innovative approach to the program and build awareness of development of sustainable practices and sustainability and entrepreneurship. capacity building through entrepreneurship. The project will take a In collaboration with Woodbridge three-pronged approach: designating a Township, Zuckerberg Institute will work target youth group in Woodbridge that are with students who to develop a plan that inspired to drive innovation within their can help businesses survive in this difficult own community.
    [Show full text]
  • Facebook Fixes "Midnight Delivery" Privacy Flaw 1 January 2013
    Facebook fixes "Midnight Delivery" privacy flaw 1 January 2013 Midnight Delivery messages by tinkering with characters in URLs, essentially manipulating electronic address data. The privacy slip came less than a week after the older sister of Facebook co-founder Mark Zuckerberg tripped on the social network's privacy settings, landing in the midst of a debate about "online etiquette." Randi Zuckerberg, who launched a Silicon Valley themed online reality show after quitting her job handling Facebook public relations, kicked off the controversy after a family photo intended for friends went public. Facebook sidestepped a privacy gaffe on Monday by fixing a flaw that made it possible to snoop on private The picture showed Mark Zuckerberg in a kitchen New Year's Eve messages sent using a "Midnight with family members dramatizing reactions to Delivery" service. messages sent with a freshly launched "Poke" feature at the California-based online social network. Facebook sidestepped a privacy gaffe on Monday Poke lets people send messages that self-destruct by fixing a flaw that made it possible to snoop on in what is seen by many as a spin on popular private New Year's Eve messages sent using a smartphone application Snapchat. "Midnight Delivery" service. Randi Zuckerberg posted a copy of the family photo Facebook took "Midnight Delivery" offline to Facebook for the eyes of close friends only, but temporarily to patch a vulnerability pointed out by evidently it was also shared with friends of those Britain-based blogger Jack Jenkins. tagged in the picture due to privacy settings at the social network.
    [Show full text]
  • Registration Statement on Form S-1
    S-1 1 d287954ds1.htm REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON FORM S-1 Table of Contents As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 1, 2012 Registration No. 333- UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 Form S-1 REGISTRATION STATEMENT Under The Securities Act of 1933 Facebook, Inc. (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 7370 20-1665019 (State or other jurisdiction of (Primary Standard Industrial (IRS Employer incorporation or organization) Classification Code Number) Identification No.) Facebook, Inc. 1601 Willow Road Menlo Park, California 94025 (650) 308-7300 (Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of Registrant’s principal executive offices) open in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API New hot app: Facebook Albums To PDF pdfcrowd.com David A. Ebersman Chief Financial Officer Facebook, Inc. 1601 Willow Road Menlo Park, California 94025 (650) 308-7300 (Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service) Please send copies of all communications to: Gordon K. Davidson, Esq. Theodore W. Ullyot, Esq. William H. Hinman, Jr., Esq. Jeffrey R. Vetter, Esq. David W. Kling, Esq. Daniel N. Webb, Esq. James D. Evans, Esq. Michael L. Johnson, Esq. Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP Fenwick & West LLP Facebook, Inc. 2550 Hanover Street 801 California Street 1601 Willow Road Palo Alto, California 94304 Mountain View, California 94041 Menlo Park, California 94025 (650) 251-5000 (650) 988-8500 (650) 308-7300 Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable after the effective date of this Registration Statement.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ethics of Online Anonymity Or Zuckerberg Vs
    22 THE ETHICS OF ONLINE ANONYMITY OR ZUCKERBERG VS. “MOOT” Robert Bodle, PhD, College of Mount St. Joseph, USA [email protected] Abstract This paper argues that anonymity in networked digital communications is indispensable as an enabler of other inalienable rights including informational privacy and freedom of expression. Yet, an alignment of industry norms, practices, ethics, and techno-social design asserts a persistent identity ecosystem, making online anonymity more difficult to achieve. This paper reappraises the democratic uses, affordances, and human rights dimensions of online anonymity in order to advance an ethical justification for its protection. Introduction Anonymity online is increasingly at risk of becoming extinct due to a host of converging developments. A rash of defamation lawsuits have eroded legal protection for anonymous defendants (Kerr, Steeves, & Luckock, 2009). Intellectual property maximalists push for a legal mandate to track and monitor infringing uses/users through intermediary liability (Washington Declaration on Intellectual Property and Public Interest, 2011). Democratic and totalitarian alike nations-states monitor citizens’ online communication and amass big data on citizens. Law enforcement agencies seek to lower the legal threshold to use information technology to track and convict criminals (e.g., GPS-enabled ubiquitous surveillance). And a powerful ad-funded Internet industry advocates for real name only policies that are shaping an online environment that probihibits anonymous, non-identifiable communication by design. These combined factors suggest a climate increasingly hostile to anonymity and pseudonymity in networked digital communications. Added to these developments is an unprecedented technical ability to share and be tracked online. With a Facebook account it is incredibly easy to maintain a persistent user identity online In fact, it is becoming the default by design.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards Trustworthy Social Media and Crowdsourcing by George Chamales, Rogue Genius, LLC | May 2013
    policy memo series vol 2 TOWARDS TRUSTWORTHY SOCIAL MEDIA AND CROWDSOURCING By George Chamales, Rogue Genius, LLC | May 2013 Individuals and organizations interested in using social media and crowdsourcing currently lack two key sets of information: a systematic assessment of the vulnerabilities in these technologies and a comprehensive set of best practices describing how to address those vulnerabilities. Identifying those vulnerabilities and developing those best practices are necessary to address a growing number of incidents ranging from innocent mistakes to targeted attacks that have claimed lives and cost millions of dollars. The trouble with trusting technology is that there The first step is to understand the primary are so many ways things can go wrong; prob- ways in which these technologies can be lems can occur as a result of weaknesses in the used. The second is to assess the ways in technology, mistakes made by users, or trouble which things can go wrong while using them. intentionally caused by abusers. This is certainly The third is to develop best practices to pre- the case when dealing with crowdsourcing and vent those bad things from happening. social media—technologies built on complex, global platforms that rely on the interaction of Building trust through understanding technolo- hundreds of thousands of people every day. gies, identifying vulnerabilities, and developing best practices does not require that the tech- Laying the foundation for trust in social media nologies or the people using them be trust- and crowdsourcing is a three-step process. worthy. Instead, it enables users ranging from Box 1. A Tale of Two Tweets Hoax Twitter Account On January 29, 2013, false mes- sages were posted to Twitter stat- ing that the Department of Justice was investigating the computer hardware manufacturer Audience, Inc.
    [Show full text]