DOCSLIB.ORG

NEWSLETTER REPORT April 25, 2005 Published Bi-Monthly

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NEWSLETTER REPORT April 25, 2005 Published Bi-Monthly New Jersey Association of Railroad Passengers NEWSLETTER REPORT April 25, 2005 Published Bi-Monthly. PO Box 68, Chatham, N.J. 07928-0068 TRANSACTION 2005: LOTS OF ‘LITTLE’ MOVEMENT An NJ-ARP team of six staffed a table, moderated and/or participated in program sessions, and otherwise lobbied for public transit solutions at the 2005 TransAction Conference in Atlantic City April 11-13. TransAction this year downplayed new projects (ongoing, projected, or simply needed) and played up the lack of funding (state and federal) for capital and operations. Partly with that in mind, NJ-ARP’s mission was to … Remind, Refocus State Players on Need for Transit Expansion: NJ-ARP Directors William R. Wright and Albert L. Papp both participated in one of TransAction’s opening sessions, “Making the Case for Transit Preservation and Expansion,” by noting the rail rights-of-way already lost and those now threatened, as well as those now being rescued. Moderator Wright led off with one success (an NJ-ARP assist), restoration of the Rahway Valley Railway lines in Union County. Panelist Papp added three other examples of NJ-ARP concern: the Lackawanna Cut-Off (also rescued in part per NJ-ARP); Monmouth-Ocean-Middlesex (MOM) rail alignments now undergoing EIS review; and the River Line. The session also allowed a fortuitous … Examination of ‘Slow Commuter Train’ Non-Think – and Alternatives: NJ-ARP’s Papp spotted one audience member familiar with the ongoing EIS process for the Lackawanna Cut-Off; that expert reviewed (and sometimes debunked) study findings of, among other items, only 800 cars diverted from Interstate 80, and the conventional wisdom of 3-hour trip times between Hoboken and Scranton (using “commuter” standards). Papp politely noted the two items were linked and, beyond that, symptomatic of “business as usual” thinking for regional rail transit. Of course, one might argue that … BRT Presentation Offers ‘Fresh Alternative’ to ‘Costly’ Rail: Two sequential sessions on Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) showed that NJ Transit is still enamored with the “fresh new” concept (invented in 1938) as a way to forestall or deny the need for real (rail) development. Led by consultants STV, the first session affirmed that the Princeton Dinky rail right-of- way still is coveted by BRT proponents, despite NJ-ARP’s warning in 2004 that it would oppose any such insult. STV reps did offer a “shared” BRT/Dinky option. The title of the second presentation, “Harnessing the Flexibility of BRT,” at least belies the oft-made claim that BRT’s value is in being “just like LRT, only cheaper!” TransAction did offer a comparable Tandem of LRT Sessions stressing promise and potential, including one entitled “Planning Light Rail Services for the Passengers.” Meanwhile on the exhibition floor, other … NJ-ARP Members Advanced Cape May Branch, Other Causes: NJ-ARP Cape May Liaison Paul Mulligan and Director Carol Ann Thomas pursued funding options for the Cape May Branch’s Canal Bridge, advancing the matter with NJT officials and others. Mulligan and Papp joined an impromptu discussion on Gloucester County rail options, shared by rail veteran Bill Vigrass; Vigrass noted 17 studies on the matter have been notched since 1931, with Vigrass participating in four of them. “Modified PATCO” (also known to NJ-ARP as “modified LRT”) remains viable, Vigrass said, although grade-crossing issues are a legitimate concern for any running to Woodbury or beyond. PATCO’s parent, the Delaware River Port Authority, wants a full PATCO expansion (see the February 2005 NEWSLETTER REPORT). Holding the fort at NJ-ARP’s display table was Coco Gordon, aided by other NJ-ARP attendees as schedules permitted. Back on the official program, NJDOT … Final NJ-ARP Session Spotlighted Hidden Transport Subsidies: This time, moderator Wright and Director Papp were joined by Fred Winkler, chief executive of the Winchester & Western Railway, in “Clear the Air on Hidden Subsidies for Roads, Air Lines, and Maritime Operations.” Wright highlighted amount of auto-related costs that are buried in real estate and other taxes, and how up to 40 percent of federal contribution to highways is derived from the general fund. Winkler addressed how railroads, once privately owned and regulated, were now in the public sector (passenger traffic) and lightly regulated (freight traffic). Papp, tapping a National Geographic June 2004 lead article “The End of Cheap Oil,” warned what might happen regardless of massive auto subsidy support. LETTIERE OFFERS IMPASSIONED PLEA TO RENEW TTF At TransAction 2005, DOT Commissioner Jack Lettiere, gave an impassioned talk – without ever referring to his notes – about why the Transportation Trust Fund (TTF) should be renewed and sustained Saying that a 1934 map of New Jersey’s transportation system hangs on his wall and that visitors from all over the nation and the world once were envious of the state, he based his talk on what type of state and transportation system we want to leave our children. Exhortations to legislators and political leadership to be responsible were frequent, with multiple analogies to parents who forgo that extra piece of clothing, shoes, and vacation for themselves in order to save and provide funds for the future education and other needs. This was not lost on the TransAction conferees. Not only did Lettiere receive more than a well deserved perfunctory applause, he received a standing ovation, the first one ever, according to Frank Reilly, in the 29-year history of the conference. The commissioner’s.... Call for TTF Renewal Backed by Assembly Transport Chair: John Wisniewski (D-19 - Middlesex), chair of the Assembly Transportation Committee, told TransAction attendees he endorsed the commissioner’s plea for more revenue and a reduced reliance on debt financing for the TTF. He and Assemblyman Peter Biondi (R-16) have co-sponsored a bill that would prohibit the state from spending more than 50 percent of TTF revenue on debt service. Susan, Levin, Commissioner of the Department of Community Affairs, also spoke briefly on the subject. New Jersey Association of Railroad Passengers NEWSLETTER REPORT April 25, 2005 Page 2 PRESIDENT’S PERSPECTIVE NJ-ARP DIRECTORS Intermodal Tax(payer) Parity and OFFICERS, 2005 The political dance is done for 2005. New Jersey Transit has weighed in with its fare NJ-ARP OFFICE/NORTH increases, with NJ-ARP and other groups doing their part – sometimes skillfully, always 1219 Garden Street earnestly – to minimize and mitigate the potential damage. The media dutifully call the Hoboken, NJ 07030 players and inform them of the amount, and NJT spokespeople generously follow to affirm 201-963-8979 (all times) (or correct) the total percentages and/or dollars. Douglas John Bowen, Director And everyone knows we may do it all again in 2006. And 2007. And so forth. NJ-ARP OFFICE/SOUTH 22 Hartford Road Whatever NJ Transit’s innumerable faults, the corporation in 2005 has been correct to Medford, NJ 08055 point out (again and again) that it needs two commitments from the state of New Jersey: 609-654-5852 (eves only) 1. A dedicated source of capital funds, known as the Transportation Trust Fund (TTF); and Carol Ann Thomas, Director 2. A dedicated operating funds source. ❇ ❇ ❇ ❇ Point Number 2 has gained some attention in 2005, but too often the media still fixate NJ-ARP TELEPHONE HOTLINE only on quotes from NJT warning of “more fare hikes” in the future. Regardless of that Available 24 Hours; likelihood (something NJ-ARP resists as an “annual occurrence”), the flip side, missed by Updated Weekly the media, is the lack of commitment to public transit by the State of New Jersey. 201-963-8979 (all times) How much money will the state legislature dedicated to public transit in fiscal year 2006? What percentage will cover New Jersey Transit’s costs? Anyone have any idea? Any NJ-ARP INTERNET HOTLINE long-term game plan? Any idea where the money will come from? No? No surprise. http://www.nj-arp.org/hotline.html Throughout all this, meanwhile, taxation on the automobile is immobile, almost stuck NJ-ARP INTERNET INFO in sacrocanct gear. That may change in the lame-duck session following this year’s http://www.nj-arp.org gubernatorial election, and NJ-ARP has been hard at work insisting that, whether it’s a gas Robert Scheurle, Webmaster tax or something else, auto users should also pay more. The taxpayers who literally do the ❇ ❇ ❇ ❇ right thing – take transit – keep getting punished out of proportion to the freeriding freeloaders. Douglas John Bowen, President 201-798-6137 (all times) Of course, many carheads don’t see the free ride. Though to their credit they’ve kept Jim Ciacciarelli, Vice President their howling low-key in 2005, the complaints still flow over “soaring gas prices” putting 856-988-5190 (all times) a strain on the SUV budgetary operations. (That’s when those SUVs aren’t attacking light William R. Wright, Secretary rail vehicles broadside.) The parity of transport penalty is nonexistent. Transit users get socked. 908-272-5968 (all times) The auto gets off. William P. Armstrong, Director Most NJ-ARP members own, or have access to, automobiles, so this is not a case of 732-919-3660 (eves only) “us versus them.” Most NJ-ARP members believe their auto use payments – in whatever Daniel Kerwin, Director form — should be altered significantly, to reflect the true costs of all transportation, and 732-261-4141 (eves) Jack McDougal, Director especially the unseen and/or hidden subsidies granted (often by the state) to automotive use. 908-638-8010 (all times) We’re open on how to do that – motor fuels tax, road-use pricing, insurance surcharges Albert L. Papp, Jr., Director (or discounts!) for miles traveled and/or auto safety records.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Driver Time Card
    Wayne - Northern Ctrl Ctr (800) 772-2237 NJ TRANSIT PADDLE Effective: 09/07/2021 VERSION 2 Service: Weekday 161 _001 Run # Lines Start From To End AM Straight 1 161 402a Wayne Wayne 1227p Block 161WY001 (1-Cruise45'Full) Rte: 161 / Sgn:6249 / Ptn:3 Note: D Rte: 161 / Sgn:6246 / Ptn:10 Note: UD Broadway Bus Terminal..................................... 633a Port Authority Bus Terminal................................1110aA Logon: 1-161 Vreeland Ave. at Park Ave.................................. 645a 31st St. at Bergenline Ave.................................. 1121a Market St. at River Rd........................................ 651a Moonachie Rd. at Moonachie Ave......................1135a DHD / Sgn: - / Ptn:35 US-46 at Westminster Pl.................................... 659a Main St. at Liberty St.......................................... 1140a Wayne Garage.................................................... 402a US-46 at Industrial Ave./Holister Rd................... 704a US-46 at Industrial Ave./Holister Rd...................1144a Broadway Bus Terminal..................................... 417a Main St. at Liberty St.......................................... 707a US-46 at Westminster Pl.................................... 1148a Moonachie Rd. at Moonachie Ave...................... 712a Market St. at River Rd........................................ 1155a Rte: 161 / Sgn:6249 / Ptn:3 Note: D Port Authority Bus Terminal................................ 732a Vreeland Ave. at Park Ave..................................1200p Broadway Bus Terminal....................................
    [Show full text]
  • 3.2: Station Access and Parking
    3.2 Station Access and Parking 3.2 Station Access and Parking A. INTRODUCTION NEW JERSEY Potential Build and No Build Alternative additions to certain parking facilities at NJ TRANSIT commuter rail stations are considered in this section. Parking at stations is provided by NJ TRANSIT, municipalities, and/or private operators throughout New Jersey. In Orange and Rockland Counties in New York, station parking is provided in coordination with Metro-North Railroad. Orange and Rockland Counties are assessed in this section because the parking analysis is based on NJ TRANSIT line segment, i.e., those groupings of stations that share similar service patterns and are close to one another (Figure 3.2-1). The analysis was completed at the segment level rather than at the station level, given the close station spacing (e.g., many stations are within 1 to 2 miles of each other), population densities in northern and central New Jersey and the connectivity of the local and regional roadway network throughout New Jersey. Because some NJ TRANSIT rail lines are located close to each other, passengers can choose between two rail lines depending on the availability of parking. This situation occurs with the individual Main and Bergen County Line segments, and also applies to other locations, such as stations along the Gladstone Branch and the Raritan Valley Line. As a result, shortfalls in parking demand can realistically be addressed at any station within a given segment, using a range of options from new construction of spaces to increased transit access, such as expansion of bus lines or implementation of community shuttle services.
    [Show full text]
  • Monmouth-Salem
    Monmouth Cont. Page Oceanport, Oceanport 45 Jacksonville, Kinnelon Borough 24 Beach Haven West, Stafford Twp 73 Red Oak Grove, Lacey Twp 63 Wanaque, Wanaque Boro 17 Orchard Estates, Freehold Twp 49 Kenvil, Roxbury Twp 23 Beach Haven, Beach Haven Boro 81 Ridgeway, Manchester Twp 55 Wanaque-Midvale Station, Wanaque 17 Osbornes Mills, Wall Twp 50 Kinnelon, Kinnelon Borough 24 Beach View, Stafford Twp 73 River Bank, Pine Beach Boro 64 Boro Bradley Beach, Bradley Bch Boro 50 Parkway Pines, Howell Twp 56 Kitchell, Rockaway Twp 23 Beachwood, Beachwood Boro 64 Rivercrest Manor, Dover Twp 56 Bradley Park, Neptune Twp 50 Wanaque-Midvale, Wanaque Boro 17 Perrineville, Millstone Twp 48 Knollwood, Madison Boro 31 Bellcrest Park, Dover Twp 56 Riverview Estates, Dover Twp 64 Branchport Station, Long Branch City 50 Wayne Station, Wayne Twp 24 Phalanx, Colts Neck Twp 44 Lake Hiawatha, Parsip-troy Hills 24 Bennetts Mills, Jackson Twp 55 Riviera Beach, Brick Twp 56 Branchport, Long Branch City 50 Wayne, Wayne Twp 24 Philips Mills, Holmdel Twp 44 Lake Hopatcong, Jefferson Twp 23 Berkeley Shores, Berkeley Twp 64 Riviera on the Barnegat, Lacey Twp 64 Brielle, Brielle Boro 57 West Milford, West Milford Twp 17 Pine Brook, Tinton Falls Boro 49 Lake Junction, Roxbury Twp 23 Boyds Hotel, Manchester Twp 63 Riviera on the Bay, Dover Twp 56 Bucks Mill, Colts Neck Twp 49 West Paterson, West Paterson Boro 25 Pleasant Valley Crossroads, Holmdel 44 Lake Parsippany, Parsip-troy Hills 24 Brant Beach, Long Beach Twp 73 Roosevelt City, Manchester Twp 63 Burlington Heights,
    [Show full text]
  • The National Gazetteer of the United States of America
    THE NATIONAL GAZETTEER OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NEW JERSEY 1983 THE NATIONAL GAZETTEER OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NEW JERSEY 1983 Barnegat Lighthouse took its name from adjacent Barnegat Inlet which connects Barnegat Bay with the Atlantic Ocean. The name, first appearing on a 1656 map as "Barndegat," reflects the early Dutch heritage of New Jersey. It is derived from "barende gat" meaning "foaming entrance (passage)," a descriptive reference to the break in the barrier islands with its foamy or breaking surf. The National Gazetteer of the United States of America New Jersey 1983 GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1200-NJ Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Board on Geographic Names UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE:1983 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR JAMES G. WATT, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DALLAS L. PECK, Director UNITED STATES BOARD ON GEOGRAPHIC NAMES JOHN A. WOLTER, Chairman MEMBERS AS OF JULY 1982 Department of State ___________________________ Sandra Shaw, member Robert Smith, deputy Postal Service ________________________________ Robert G. Krause, member Paul S. Bakshi, deputy Lawrence L. Lum, deputy Department of Interior _________________________ Rupert B. Southard, member Solomon M. Lang, deputy Dwight F. Rettie, deputy David E. Meier, deputy Department of Agriculture _______________________ Myles R. Hewlett, member Lewis G. Glover, deputy Donald D. Loff, deputy Department of Commerce ______________----___- Charles E. Harrington, member Richard L. Forstall, deputy Roy G. Saltman, deputy Government Printing Office _____________________ Robert C. McArtor, member Roy W. Morton, deputy Library of Congress ____________________________ John A. Wolter, member Myrl D. Powell, deputy Department of Defense _________________________ Thomas P. Morris, member Carl Nelius, deputy Staff assistance for domestic geographic names provided by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • [email protected]
    Appendix A Project Web Site Screen Capture Appendix B TAC Meeting Materials TAC Agenda Northeast New Jersey Metro Mobility Study Technical Advisory Meeting #1 October 28, 2009 AGENDA Welcome – NJTPA and NJ Transit I. Project Introduction – presented by study team a. Introduction of the Study Team (J. Gilligan) b. Northeast New Jersey Metro Mobility Study Goals and Challenges (J. Pavlovich) c. Study Scope and Products (J. Pavlovich) d. Project Schedule (J. Pavlovich) II. Work Completed to Date – presented by study team a. NJ TRANSIT Staff Workshops (J. Pavlovich) b. Bus Operator Interviews – Major Themes (J. Pavlovich) c. Origin/Destination Data Collection (Phase 1) (J. Pavlovich) d. Website Development (J. Yost) III. Discussion – TAC membership and study team a. Role of the TAC and Advisory Committee (J. Pavlovich) b. Advisory Committee membership (J. Pavlovich) c. Areas of local concern or emphasis (J. Pavlovich) d. Other suggestions, questions, or concerns (J. Pavlovich) IV. Next Steps – TAC membership and study team a. Public Outreach Events (M. Kelly) i. Advisory Committee ii. Public Forum iii. Meetings with Local Jurisdictions b. Data Analysis (J. Pavlovich) i. Analysis of O&D Data (Phase 2) ii. Compilation of Bus Operator Data into preliminary guide for improvements c. Bus Route Analysis (J. Pavlovich) d. Potential for BRT Initiatives (J. Gilligan) i. Analysis of Bergen County Efforts ii. Other BRT potential corridors in study area e. Next TAC meeting time, place, and topics (J. Gilligan) TAC Presentation NortheastNortheast NewNew JerseyJersey MetroMetro MobilityMobility StudyStudy TechnicalTechnical AdvisoryAdvisory CommitteeCommittee MeetingMeeting #1#1 OctoberOctober 28,28, 20092009 NJTPANJTPA MeetingMeeting AgendaAgenda 1. Project Introduction 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Municipality and 20K Car Year Constraints Reflected New
    NEW JERSEY ­ PERSONAL AUTO TERRITORY BOUNDARY REVIEW Comparison of Present and Proposed All Coverage Relativities New Jersey ­ 49 Territory TREE Scheme Municipality and 20K Car Year Constraints Reflected November 29 Territory Proposal Cap Curr All Cov Change Credibility 2005 All Cov Credibility All Cov Between Weighted Industry BI 2001­2005 Weighted Raw Current Terr 2001­2005 Zip Town/ Current 49 Scheme Level Terr ZIP PPI Territory 2001­2005 2001­2005 PPI and ZIP Code Indices Code City Territory Territory Car Years Cred 2001­2005 PPI Territory PPI PPI Cred Wtd PPI BI PD PIP OTC Collision 07001 Avenel (section of Woodbridge) 8 101 7,234 1.0 1.12 1.27 1.02 1.02 ­19.7% 1.26 1.10 1.04 0.95 1.11 07064 Port Reading (section of Woodbridge) 8 101 2,823 1.0 1.03 1.27 1.02 1.02 ­19.7% 1.07 1.04 1.04 0.84 1.02 07067 Colonia (section of Woodbridge) 8 101 14,304 1.0 0.93 1.27 1.02 1.02 ­19.7% 0.94 1.02 0.80 0.84 1.00 07077 Sewaren (section of Woodbridge) 8 101 1,930 1.0 1.02 1.27 1.02 1.02 ­19.7% 1.03 1.03 1.04 0.94 0.97 07095 Woodbridge 8 101 11,574 1.0 1.04 1.27 1.02 1.02 ­19.7% 1.14 1.05 1.02 0.90 0.95 07721 Cliffwood (section of Aberdeen) 17 101 1,556 1.0 0.95 0.86 1.02 1.02 18.6% 0.91 1.01 0.94 0.77 0.99 08830 Iselin (section of Woodbridge, includes Metropark 8 101 10,880 1.0 1.08 1.27 1.02 1.02 ­19.7% Station) 1.15 1.15 0.97 0.75 1.13 08832 Keasbey (section of Woodbridge) 8 101 1,126 1.0 1.45 1.27 1.02 1.02 ­19.7% 1.71 1.03 1.78 0.99 1.26 08857 Old Bridge 40 101 27,264 1.0 0.99 0.98 1.02 1.02 4.1% 0.98 1.02 0.98 0.84 1.02 08859 Parlin (section
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Advisory Committee Meeting 1 – September 10, 2019 AGENDA 1
    Technical Advisory Committee Meeting 1 – September 10, 2019 AGENDA 1. Welcome and introductions 2. Study overview 3. Preliminary findings 4. Market opportunities 5. Discussion and next steps North Jersey Transportation Planning Authority PROJECT TEAM Passaic County Essex County NJ TRANSIT Fitzgerald & Halliday, Inc. Dewberry Sobers Consulting James Redeker PURPOSE To explore opportunities to run transit service between Paterson in Passaic County and Newark in Essex County along a combination of dedicated (off-street) corridors, as well as possible shared and mixed-traffic operations. STUDY OVERVIEW GOAL To identify regional solutions to reduce traffic congestion, improve mass transit service, and support economic development through increased access to jobs, education, healthcare, and commercial development OUTCOMES • Assess market potential for new transit corridors • Determine feasibility and options for transit development • Study will not identify a locally preferred alternative SCOPE OF WORK Task 1 Project Management Task 2 Public and Stakeholder Outreach Task 3 Data Collection - Community Characteristics - Infrastructure Assessment STUDY OVERVIEW Task 4 Market Assessment and Metrics - Develop Service Options - Market Assessment Task 5 Findings and Recommendations Task 6 Final Report and Deliverables ENGAGEMENT Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Focus Groups Public Meetings and Pop-ups STUDY OVERVIEW ** OUTREACH IMAGES HERE ENGAGEMENT Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Focus Groups Public Meetings and Pop-ups STUDY OVERVIEW ENGAGEMENT
    [Show full text]
  • Affordable Housing………
    Essex County, NJ 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan 2020 One Year Action Plan CDBG – HOME – ESG Containing information of all programs and projects administered by: The Department of Economic Development, Training & Employment The Division of Housing & Community Development Joseph N. Di Vincenzo, Jr., County Executive Robert D. Jackson, County Administrator Anibal Ramos, Jr., Department Director George F. Serio, Jr., Division Director Sí necesitán ayúda entendiendo documento llamen (973) 655-0200 y pregunten por Elvin Pereira County of Essex New Jersey Joseph N. Di Vincenzo, Jr. Essex County Executive Robert D. Jackson Essex County Administrator Board of Chosen Freeholders Brendan W. Gill, President – Freeholder At-Large Wayne L. Richardson, Vice President – District 2 Rufus I. Johnson – Freeholder At-Large Romaine Graham – Freeholder At Large Patricia Sebold – Freeholder At-Large Robert Mercado – Freeholder, District 1 Tyshammie L Cooper– Freeholder, District 3 Leonard M. Luciano – Freeholder, District 4 Carlos M. Pomares – Freeholder, District 5 Deborah Davis Ford – Clerk of the Board Department of Economic Development Training & Employment Anibal Ramos, Jr., Department Director Division of Housing and Community Development George F. Serio, Jr, Division Director Table of Contents Executive Summary ES-05 Executive Summary........................................................................... The Process PR-05 Lead & Responsible Agencies.......................................................... PR-10 Consultation.......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Delawanna Train Station Schedule
    Delawanna Train Station Schedule potometersErnest underachieving disconsolately. yesterday Dryke asmischarge svelte Barnard lengthwise. disrobes her autopsy ill-uses spryly. Herve is speedfully lacerative after contrabass Elvin synopsises his Shuttle Arrival at Delawanna Station and Drop Off 650 AM 716 AM 750 AM 22 AM 900 AM SCHEDULED TRAIN DEPARTURE TIMES 657 AM 720 AM. How is NJ TRANSIT ensuring that the risk of contracting the virus is minimized when using transit services? South Orange is missing New Jersey Transit station just South Orange New Jersey along the Morris and Essex formerly Erie Lackawanna rail line customer is located in mature business occupation of South Orange near other town hall kitchen is ambassador of their train stations in the township of South Orange Mountain. Train Schedules & Ticket Information Croton-on-Hudson NY. Please wait a second and reload this page. These tickets are not issued to children. If you may be honored on peter cheeseman road at princeton for my phone lines serve newark liberty international airport? ID Card hence the mail approximately four weeks after applying. This service will be available Monday through Friday. Passwords are using rail station, and destination will be aware that you could save! Customers using a rail monthly or weekly pass both be when to travel one zone for recess on connecting bus or top rail lines. The train operating from hoboken requires transfer your ride. Reduced Fare Coupon each time you ride. Can use an interactive science center with accessibility. Train Company, landlord is valid on all gift Company services on the route and reward the zones for expression the define is issued.
    [Show full text]
  • Essex County Transportation Plan 2013
    Comprehensive Transportation Plan Table of Contents Chapter 1: Executive Summary ............................................................................ 1 Chapter 2: Inventory & Assessment .................................................................... 4 2.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Complete Streets Policy ..................................................................................... 4 2.3 Land Use & Development Conditions ............................................................. 5 2.3.1 Existing Land Use Patterns ......................................................................... 5 2.3.2 Future Land Use Planning .......................................................................... 5 2.3.3 Employment & Retail Centers ................................................................... 11 2.3.4 Schools ....................................................................................................... 11 2.3.5 Natural & Environmental Resources ........................................................ 13 2.4 Population & Demographic Trends ............................................................... 14 2.4.1 County Population & Growth Trends ........................................................ 14 2.4.2 Income, Housing & Employment .............................................................. 16 2.5 Roadway Inventory ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]