San Antonio School Guide
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
l FLORENCE BURNET CONS. 994 3,277 JARRELL 1,010 GRANGER DEVINE LLANO LIBERTY 410 THORNDALE 1,937 1,836 HILL GEORGETOWN 566 le 2,752 10,397 THRALL 631 LEANDER HUTTO ROUND 5,669 TAYLOR MARBLE FALLS 33,309 ROCK 3,119 4,065 45,034 LAGO DOSS CONS. COUPLAND VISTA PFLUGERVILLE 106l 21 1,329 23,070 LEXINGTON 931 DIME MANOR ELGIN BOX LAKE 7,723 4,107 188 JOHNSON CITY TRAVIS 7,412 HARPER FREDERICKSBURG 712 MCDADE 563 2,934 EANES 192 7,803 INGRAM DRIPPING GIDDINGS 1,040 SPRINGS AUSTIN DEL VALLE 4,589 86,528 11,199 1,931 BASTROP DIVIDE ROUND 166 9,109 TOP-CARMINE BLANCO 252 966 WIMBERLEY HAYS CONS. HUNT COMFORT 2,017 15,932 SMITHVILLE FAYETTEVILLE 192 1,094 KERRVILLE 1,724 LA GRANGE 202 CENTER 4,894 LOCKHART 1,868 POINT 134,782 616 SAN MARCOS CONS COMAL 7,513 17,817 FLATONIA LEAKEY MEDINA BOERNE 288 593 230 NEW 6,753 SCHULENBURG BRAUNFELS PRAIRIE LEA 711 8,010 NAVARRO 226 LULING WAELDER BANDERA 1,604 1,423 288 2,448 UTOPIA 203 SCHERTZ-CIBOLO- UNIVERSAL CITY NORTH EAST NORTHSIDE 67,439 13,060 (BEXAR) MARION SEGUIN ALAMO 1,376 7,440 98,110 HEIGHTS GONZALES 4,805 JUDSON 22,503 2,751 HONDO FORT SAM HOUSTON RANDOLPH SABINAL MEDINA 1,548 FIELD 2,214 EDGEWOOD (BEXAR) SAN 1,158 548 VALLEY 11,863 ANTONIO BRACKETT D’HANIS 54,394 LA VERNIA 3,545 599 317 LACKLAND SOUTH SAN EAST 3,066 1,113 ANTONIO CENTRAL SOUTHWEST 14,950 NIXON-SMILEY KNIPPA 12,459 9,462 STOCKDALE CONS. UVALDE CONS 299 NATALIA SOMERSET 787 1,045 4,888 1,120 LYTLE 3,852 SOUTHSIDE 1,719 5,187 FLORESVILLE 3,834 POTEET 1,776 POTH LA PRYOR 810 470 20 PEARSALL CHARLOTTE PLEASANTON 2,224 524 3,436 EAGLE PASS JOURDANTON 15,012 CRYSTAL CITY 1,427 2,081 DILLEY 983 Palac CARRIZO SPRINGS CONS. 2,377 COTULLA 1,214 Overview of the 2019 State Accountability System Student Achievement School Progress Closing the Gaps All Students All Students All Students and Disaggregated STAAR Part A: Academic Student Groups Growth • Combined over all subject areas evaluated (reading, mathematics, writing, science, and Student performance disaggregated by social studies) Credit awarded the following: • Credit awarded for Approaches Grade Level or above, Meets Grade Level or above, and for students • All students Masters Grade Level on who improve • Race/ethnicity STAAR* (with and without accommodations) in grades 3–8 (including Spanish performance • Economically disadvantaged status versions where applicable); year over year as • Current special education EOC assessments (with and without accommodations); and measured by STAAR • Former special education College, Career,STAAR Alternate and Military 2 atl Leve ReadinessII Satisfactory and Level III Accomplished standards. progress measures • Current and monitored English and performance learners levels on STAAR • Continuously enrolled Percentage of annual graduates that accomplish any one of the following: reading and Components• Non-continuously enrolled • Meet TSI criteria in ELA/reading and mathematics on assessments or college prep courses Partmathematics. B: Relative • Meet AP/IB criteria Performance • Earn dual-course credits • Academic Achievement • Enlist in the U.S. Armed Forces • Federal Graduation or Growth • Earn an approved industry -based certi�ication Credit awarded Status • Earn ate’s an associ degree while in high school based on • English Lang �iciency uage Pro • Graduate with completed IEP and workforce readiness performance relative Domain• School Score Quality or Student Success • Earn a Level I or Lev teel II certi�ica to similar districts or • Complete an OnRamps dual-enrollment course Domaincampuses. Score • Graduate under an advanced degr ee plan and be identi�ied as a current special education Credit is awarded based on weighted student performance of student groups against • Complete CTE coherent sequence coursework and earn credit aligned with approved The School Progress annual targets. Graduationindustry re-basedRate certi�ications (one-halfdit) point c domain score is the better of Part A: The Closing the Gaps domain score Academic Growth is based on the four components DomainFour-year Scoreive-year,, � or six-year graduation rate (or annual dropout rate if no graduation rate) or Palativert B: Re weighted according to district or Performance. campus type. For elementary and middle schools, the Student Achievement domain score is based solely on the STAAR component. For districts and high schools, the three components are weighted 40%-40%-20%,Student Achievementrespectively. School Progress 70% 30% DistinctionBetter of eitherdesignations or ofdomain overall = rating of overall rating Student AchievementSchool Progress 70% DA, B, C 30% are awarded to campuses in ELA/reading, mathematics, science, social studies, Academic Growth, and Closing the Gaps. Distinction designationsBetter are of awardedeither to campuses and districts in or Postsecondary Readiness. domain Districts = and campuses of overall must ratingbe2019 rated Accountability , overallor to Manual. be eligible of overall for distinctions. rating *STAAR results fryearom EL in students U.S. schools in their are excluded�irst from accountability calculations. STAAR results from EL students in their second year in U.S. schools are included via the EL performance measure. STAAR Alternate 2 results are included without regard to number yearsof in U.S. schools. For more information, see the Highlights of the 2019 Accountability System Ratings In 2018, the state academic accountability system underwent an overhaul under House Bill (HB) 22 (85th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2017). HB 22 established three domains of indicators to evaluate the academic performance of districA, B, ts,C, Dopen-enroF llment charter schools, and campuses: Student Achievement, School Progress, and Closing the Gaps. HB 22 requires the commissioner to assign districts and campuses a rating of , or for overall performance, as well as for performance in each domain. Overview of the 2019 Accountability System StudentThe overall Achi designevement of the accountability system evaluates performance according to three domains: evaluates performance across all subjects for all students, on both general and alternate assessments, College, Career, and Military Readiness (CCMR) indicators, and Schgraduationool Progress rates. measures district and campus outcomes in two areas: the number of students that grew at least one year academically (or are on track) as measured by STAAR results and the achievement of all students relative to districts or campuses with similar economically disClosingadvantaged the Gaps percentages. uses disaggregated data to demonstrate differentials among racial/ethnic groups, socioeconomic backgrounds and other factors. The indicators included in this domain, as well as the domain’s construction, align the state accountability system with the federal Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA). The State of Texas More than �ive million students were enrolled in Texas public schools in the 2018–19 school year, and they took nearly nine million STAAR assessments in reading, mathematics, writing, science, and social studies. Of all assessments taken, 78 percent met the Approaches Grade Level standard or above, 50 percent met the Meets Grade Level standard or above, and 24 percent met the Masters Grade Level standard. Of the 335,500 2018 annual graduates evaluated in accountability, 65 percent met the criteria for one or more College, Career, and Military Readiness indicators. Statewide, the 2018 4-year graduation rate for all students was 90.0 percent. A B Distric ts (including Open-EnrCollment Charter Schools) D Of the 1,201 districts F in Texas, 301 (25.1%) earned an overall rating, 677 (56.4%) earned a overall rating, 154 (12.8%) earned a overall rating, 43 (3.6%) earned a overall rating, and 14 (1.2%) earned an overall rating. A District Accountability Rating Count Percentage B 301 25.1% C 677 56.4% D 154 12.8% F 43 3.6% Not Rated 14 1.2% 12 1.0% Totals 1,201 100% Texas Education Agency | Governance & Accountability | Performance Reporting 1 of 3 Highlights of the 2019 Accountability System Ratings A CampusBes (including Open-Enrollment Charter Schools) D Of the 8,838 campuses in Texas, 1,75F 0 (19.8%) earned an overall rating, 3,276 (37.1%) campuses earNotned Rated a overall rating, 2,171 (24.6%) earned a overall rating, 703 (8.0%) earned a overall rating and 402 (4.5%) earned an overall rating. The remaining 536 (6.1%) campuses were labeled . A Campus Accountability Rating Count Percentage B 1,750 19.8% C 3,276 37.1% D 2,171 24.6% F 703 8.0% Not Rated 402 4.5% 536 6.1% Totals 8,838 100% A Open-EnrollmentB Charters C D Of the 179 open-enrollment charter schoolsF in Texas, 44 (24.6%) earned an overall rating, 55 (30.7%) earned a overaNot Rall tedrating, 40 (22.3%) earned a overall rating, 22 (12.3%) earned a overall rating, and eight (4.5%) earned an overall rating. 10 (5.6%) open-enrollment charter schools were labeled . A B C D Of the 747 open-enrollment charter campusesF in Texas, 166 (22.2%) earned an overall rating, 225 (30.1%) earnedNot a Rated overall rating, 157 (21.0%) earned a overall rating, 76 (10.2%) earned a overall rating, and 39 (5.2%) earned an overall rating. The remaining 84 (11.2%) charter schools were labeled . Alternative EducationA Campuses (AECs) B C Of the 379 AECs evaluated under theD alternative education accountability (AEA)F provisions, 72 (19.0%) earned an overall rating, 71 (18.7%) earned a overall rating, 49 (Not12.9 R%)ated, ear ned a overall rating, 56 (14.8%) ear ned a overall rating, and 15 (4.0%) earned an overall rating. The remaining 116 (30.6%) alternative education campuses (AECs) were labeled seven of which are AECs of choice, 18 are dropout recovery schools, and 91 are residential treatment facilities (RTFs).