Celebrating 75 Years

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Celebrating 75 Years CELEBRATING 75 YEARS The State Bar of California “Victory Dinner” • The Palace Hotel, San Francisco • November 17, 1927 2• Celebrating 75 Years After two failed attempts, a unified State Bar is created with Gov. C.C. Young’s signature on March 31, 1927 ■ On July 29, 1927, the State Bar Celebrating 75 Years • 3 LOOKING BACK ON 75 YEARS HIGHLIGHTS 3 LOOKING BACK 4 WOMEN IN THE LAW 7 FOUR LONG CAREERS 9 MEMBERSHIP 10 A FEW FIRSTS 13 THE CHIEF JUSTICE 13 HISTORIC COURTHOUSES FROM THE ARCHIVES The State Bar’s first board of governors was elected in November 1927. It included attorneys from 17 Eureka, Redding, Sacramento, Oakland, San Francisco, San Jose, Fresno, Los Angeles and San Diego. 23 THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR By KRISTINA HORTON FLAHERTY The changes are dramatic. But existence. Most recently, a sharply Staff Writer what’s just as striking — from histori- critical Gov. Pete Wilson vetoed the cal archives and interviews with past bar’s dues bill in late 1997, triggering 27 THE INCOMING PRESIDENT hen California’s unified State leaders — is how much has remained mass layoffs and a virtual shutdown. W Bar was launched in 1927, no the same. The challenges to the State Today, however, a revitalized State one predicted it would be easy. Bar’s self-regulatory role, for exam- Bar is rebuilding the organization. “The first year will be a crucial ple, resurface again and again. Back in 1927, bar leaders had to one, for we have no charted course And many of the challenges to start from scratch — initially register- Self-regulation to follow, no precedent to aid us, nor the profession, too, remain constant, ing some 10,000 attorneys at $3 a guiding star other than our ideals notes retired State Bar executive each. (There was no existing registry.) after a decade- and conscience,” Joseph Webb, the director Herb Rosenthal. “It’s the In the first year alone, they appointed first State Bar president, wrote in a means of dealing with the chal- local administrative committees 1927 State Bar Journal column. lenges that have changed, expanded, statewide to hear client complaints. long struggle “And as we are sailing upon an contracted,” he said. They drafted procedural rules and uncharted sea,” he warned, “mistakes The State Bar of California, a developed the nation’s first enforce- may be made and there may be criti- public corporation within the judicial able rules of professional conduct for t was November 1927. Calvin cisms to meet.” lawyers. In addition, I Coolidge was in the White House. But the early State some 2,500 attorneys Charles Lindbergh had soloed across Bar leaders were deter- were recruited for new the Atlantic. Babe Ruth had hit 60 mined to “kick the rascals “sections” to study five home runs. America was in the grip out of the profession,” areas — civil procedure; of the Jazz Age and prohibition. raise admission standards criminal law and proce- Stocks were soaring. and work collectively to dure; courts and judicial And quietly, amid these events, a improve the administra- officers; regulatory com- meeting which would prove to be of tion of justice. missions; and profession- lasting consequence to the legal pro- Three quarters of a al conduct — and rec- fession and the California public took century later, the State ommend changes to the place. On November 17, some 600 Bar — alternately laud- legislature. lawyers from around the state made ed, attacked, misunder- “We have accom- their way to San Francisco by train, stood and closely scruti- plished up to date in this automobile and ferry. They pushed nized throughout its his- one short year more through Market Street’s traffic to gath- tory — has seen its ranks along the lines of er for a “Victory Dinner” in the swell from roughly approaching ideals than Grand Ballroom of the Palace Hotel. 10,000 practicing attor- has been accomplished After 10 years of work, the State neys to 140,000. It now in all the past by the Bar Self-Governing Act was going investigates 5,000 to The State Bar Act was signed on March 31, 1927. Pictured, united effort of individual into effect and the State Bar would 6,000 complaints annu- from left to right, are Joseph J. Webb, San Francisco; Gov. lawyers and the courts,” hold its organizational meeting the ally in the nation’s only C.C. Young; and Kemper Campbell, Los Angeles. Robert Fitzgerald, a for- next day. That night, in the Grand attorney discipline sys- mer president of Ballroom, Col. William J. Donovan, tem with a full-time California’s earlier volun- assistant to the Attorney General of State Bar Court. It administers the bar branch, was created by the State Bar tary bar, declared in 1928. the United States, said: examination to some 14,000 Act in 1927 to assist the Supreme In the early years, the unautho- “Yours is the great opportunity to prospective attorneys each year. It Court in regulating the legal profes- rized practice of law by banks and evidence to the bar of the country reimburses funds — about $50 mil- sion and in improving the administra- trust companies, court reform, that the surest way to rebuild our lion in 30 years — to attorney theft tion of justice. The legislature pro- “ambulance chasing,” professional waning prestige, to restore confi- victims. It distributes lawyer trust vides oversight by regularly approv- ethics and attorney qualifications dence in the moral and intellectual account interest — some $250 mil- ing — or disapproving — the amount were among the topics that dominat- integrity of our profession, is to lion so far — to legal programs serv- of mandatory dues collected annually ed the professional debate. regain our self-respect by self-govern- ing the poor. And with its many com- from all California attorneys. In an oral history, Gilford G. mittees and sections, it works to From its beginnings, the bar has ORIGINS continued on page 24 improve the administration of justice. faced numerous challenges to its HISTORY continued on page 6 Act goes into effect ■ In December 1927, the Judicial Council ends its first year in existence ■ In 1934, the bar’s Conference of Delegates 4• Celebrating 75 Years Women in the Law The early years ■ Clara Shortridge papers and other materials “within Foltz blazed the trial days of her death,” laments Babcock. That made her discovery deep in By KATHLEEN BEITIKS the bowels of the Huntington Library in Pasadena all the more exciting. Staff Writer “I found it in the Huntington’s n another era, she might have uncatalogued collection of had a case of the vapors. But ephemera,” said Babcock, “but I’m Barbara Babcock simply certain somewhere there are 15 or Idescribed her condition as 16 other scrapbooks from her early heart-pounding when she unearthed years.” The scrapbook Babcock dis- an old scrapbook belonging to Clara covered contained an abundance of Shortridge Foltz, California’s first news clippings, but did not reveal woman lawyer. the intimate glimpse into Foltz’s life It was one of the most exciting that she had hoped. “It may be the finds in Babcock’s years of research last one in the series, extending from on Foltz. 1916 to about 1930,” she says. Today, nearly a decade later, Even so, Babcock is keeping her Babcock is at work on the final chap- fingers crossed that more scrapbooks ter of Foltz’s life story, which is to be will emerge from other collections, published by the Stanford University libraries or even a cluttered attic. Press. And, after years of poring Writing Foltz’s biography was to through old and musty books and be a labor of love for Babcock when papers, the Stanford law professor has Courtesy of the California State Library she began her research, but more built an electronic archive of the sweat and tears have been involved materials unearthed in her effort to than she anticipated. Her problem, pull the bits and pieces of Foltz’s life she admits, is that her approach has into one definitive work. been one of a “trial lawyer’s mentali- It was on Sept. 4, 1878, that Foltz ty,” when in fact she has had to take and her sister suffragists celebrated on the persona of an historian. the passage of the Woman Lawyer’s She has written numerous arti- Bill in the state legislature, finally giv- cles on Foltz throughout the period ing the women of California the right of her research and continues to be to study law. “She is a person who fascinated with the life of the woman was extraordinarily famous in her Clara Shortridge Foltz, shown above, was the first woman admitted who was responsible for breaking time,” says Babcock. to practice law in California in 1879. down the gender barriers in the prac- But Foltz’s celebrity then virtually tice of law. disappeared over the years — until whose biographical work largely research, initially leading her to On July 16, 1849, Clara recently. Just this year, the Los Angeles brought Foltz to this recognition, a believe they were lost to history. Shortridge was born in Lafayette, Criminal Courthouse was renamed for “great day for women lawyers.” Foltz had outlived four of her five Ind. Her father, Elias, was trained as Clara Shortridge Foltz in a ceremony Foltz was known for keeping children when she died in 1934 at a lawyer. He eventually changed that honored other early women in scrapbooks, but none had surfaced the age of 85. Unfortunately, her sole law as well. It was, says Babcock, in Babcock’s early years of surviving heir auctioned off all her CLARA continued on page 16 Courtesy of the California State Library nnette Abbot Adams: (1877- da May Adams: (1886-1965) The eorgia P.
Recommended publications
  • Appendix File Anes 1988‐1992 Merged Senate File
    Version 03 Codebook ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ CODEBOOK APPENDIX FILE ANES 1988‐1992 MERGED SENATE FILE USER NOTE: Much of his file has been converted to electronic format via OCR scanning. As a result, the user is advised that some errors in character recognition may have resulted within the text. MASTER CODES: The following master codes follow in this order: PARTY‐CANDIDATE MASTER CODE CAMPAIGN ISSUES MASTER CODES CONGRESSIONAL LEADERSHIP CODE ELECTIVE OFFICE CODE RELIGIOUS PREFERENCE MASTER CODE SENATOR NAMES CODES CAMPAIGN MANAGERS AND POLLSTERS CAMPAIGN CONTENT CODES HOUSE CANDIDATES CANDIDATE CODES >> VII. MASTER CODES ‐ Survey Variables >> VII.A. Party/Candidate ('Likes/Dislikes') ? PARTY‐CANDIDATE MASTER CODE PARTY ONLY ‐‐ PEOPLE WITHIN PARTY 0001 Johnson 0002 Kennedy, John; JFK 0003 Kennedy, Robert; RFK 0004 Kennedy, Edward; "Ted" 0005 Kennedy, NA which 0006 Truman 0007 Roosevelt; "FDR" 0008 McGovern 0009 Carter 0010 Mondale 0011 McCarthy, Eugene 0012 Humphrey 0013 Muskie 0014 Dukakis, Michael 0015 Wallace 0016 Jackson, Jesse 0017 Clinton, Bill 0031 Eisenhower; Ike 0032 Nixon 0034 Rockefeller 0035 Reagan 0036 Ford 0037 Bush 0038 Connally 0039 Kissinger 0040 McCarthy, Joseph 0041 Buchanan, Pat 0051 Other national party figures (Senators, Congressman, etc.) 0052 Local party figures (city, state, etc.) 0053 Good/Young/Experienced leaders; like whole ticket 0054 Bad/Old/Inexperienced leaders; dislike whole ticket 0055 Reference to vice‐presidential candidate ? Make 0097 Other people within party reasons Card PARTY ONLY ‐‐ PARTY CHARACTERISTICS 0101 Traditional Democratic voter: always been a Democrat; just a Democrat; never been a Republican; just couldn't vote Republican 0102 Traditional Republican voter: always been a Republican; just a Republican; never been a Democrat; just couldn't vote Democratic 0111 Positive, personal, affective terms applied to party‐‐good/nice people; patriotic; etc.
    [Show full text]
  • 110Th Congress 17
    CALIFORNIA 110th Congress 17 CALIFORNIA (Population 2000, 33,871,648) SENATORS DIANNE FEINSTEIN, Democrat, of San Francisco, CA; born in San Francisco, June 22, 1933; education: B.A., Stanford University, 1955; elected to San Francisco Board of Super- visors, 1970–78; president of Board of Supervisors: 1970–71, 1974–75, 1978; mayor of San Francisco, 1978–88; candidate for governor of California, 1990; recipient: Distinguished Woman Award, San Francisco Examiner; Achievement Award, Business and Professional Women’s Club, 1970; Golden Gate University, California, LL.D. (hon.), 1979; SCOPUS Award for Out- standing Public Service, American Friends of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem; University of Santa Clara, D.P.S. (hon.); University of Manila, D.P.A. (hon.), 1981; Antioch University, LL.D. (hon.), 1983; Los Angeles Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith’s Distinguished Serv- ice Award, 1984; French Legion d’Honneur from President Mitterand, 1984; Mills College, LL.D. (hon.), 1985; U.S. Army’s Commander’s Award for Public Service, 1986; Brotherhood/ Sisterhood Award, National Conference of Christians and Jews, 1986; Paulist Fathers Award, 1987; Episcopal Church Award for Service, 1987; U.S. Navy Distinguished Civilian Award, 1987; Silver Spur Award for Outstanding Public Service, San Francisco Planning and Urban Renewal Association, 1987; All Pro Management Team Award for No. 1 Mayor, City and State Magazine, 1987; Community Service Award Honoree for Public Service, 1987; American Jew- ish Congress, 1987; President’s Award, St. Ignatius High School, San Francisco, 1988; Coro Investment in Leadership Award, 1988; President’s Medal, University of California at San Fran- cisco, 1988; University of San Francisco, D.H.L.
    [Show full text]
  • California's Affirmative Action Fight
    Research & Occasional Paper Series: CSHE.5.18 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY http://cshe.berkeley.edu/ The University of California@150* CALIFORNIA’S AFFIRMATIVE ACTION FIGHT: Power Politics and the University of California March 2018 John Aubrey Douglass** UC Berkeley Copyright 2018 John Aubrey Douglass, all rights reserved. ABSTRACT This essay discusses the contentious events that led to the decision by the University of California’s Board of Regents to end affirmative action in admissions, hiring and contracting at the university in July 1995. This was a significant decision that provided momentum to California’s passage of Proposition 209 the following year ending “racial preferences” for all of the state’s public agencies. Two themes are offered. In virtually any other state, the debate over university admissions would have bled beyond the confines of a university’s governing board. The board would have deferred to lawmakers and an even more complicated public discourse. The University of California’s unusual status as a “public trust” under the state constitution, however, meant that authority over admissions was the sole responsibility of the board. This provided a unique forum to debate affirmative action for key actors, including Regent Ward Connerly and Governor Pete Wilson, to pursued fellow regents to focus and decide on a hotly debated social issue related to the dispersal of a highly sought public good – access to a selective public university. Two themes are explored. The first focuses on the debate within the university community and the vulnerability of existing affirmative action programs and policies—including a lack of unanimity among the faculty regarding the use of racial preferences.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4 - Direct Democracy in a Hyperpluralistic Age Test Bank
    CHAPTER 4 - DIRECT DEMOCRACY IN A HYPERPLURALISTIC AGE TEST BANK MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS 1. The Progressive Era began in A. the early 1800s. B. the mid 1800s. C. the late 1800s. D. the mid 1900s. 2. A reform that allows voters to nominate candidates is the A. direct primary. B. at-large election. C. party caucus. D. recall. 3. The Progressive reforms were designed to A. return power to the national government. B. make government businesslike. C. increase the importance of cities. D. none of the above. 4. Reforms inhibiting influence of political machines include A. initiative. B. recall. C. referendum. D. direct primaries. 5. At-large-elections encourage local candidates to support A. narrow, district-based views. B. democratic views. C. mainly, urban perspectives. D. broader, citywide views. Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. 34 Chapter 4: Direct Democracy in a Hyperpluralistic Age 6. California’s Progressives were white and A. lower class. B. upper class. C. middle class. D. working class. 7. In 1910, about sixty percent of California’s population was A. rural. B. suburban. C. urban. D. urban and suburban. 8. California’s Progressives were reformers, not A. liberals. B. radicals. C. socialists. D. conservatives. 9. One of the Progressive leaders who pushed direct democracy as governor was A. Jerry Brown. B. Hiram Johnson C. Culbert Olson. D. Pat Brown. 10. Today the Progressive tradition is fostered by the A. Chambers of Commerce. B. League of Women Voters. C. Legislative Analyst’s Office. D. Conference of Mayors. 11. Today the initiative is used primarily by A.
    [Show full text]
  • Cal 2004-165
    THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA STANDING COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY AND CONDUCT FORMAL OPINION NO. 2004-165 ISSUE: 1. What are the ethical responsibilities of a member of the California State Bar who uses outside contract lawyers to make appearances on behalf of the member’s clients? 2. What are the ethical responsibilities of the outside contract lawyer who makes the appearances? DIGEST: 1. To comply with his or her ethical responsibilities, a member of the California State Bar who uses an outside contract lawyer to make appearances on behalf of the member’s client must disclose to his client the fact of the arrangement between the member and the outside lawyer when the use of the outside lawyer constitutes a significant development in the matter. Whether the use of the outside lawyer constitutes a significant development will depend upon the circumstances in each situation. If, at the outset of the engagement, the member anticipates using outside lawyers to make appearances on behalf of the member’s client, the member should address the issue in the written fee agreement with the client. If the member charges the outside lawyer’s fees and costs to the client as a disbursement, the member must state the client’s obligations for those charges in the written fee agreement. In addition, the member remains responsible to the client, which includes responsibility for competently supervising the outside lawyer. Finally, the member must comply with the ethical rules concerning competence, confidentiality, advertising, and conflicts of interest that apply to his or her role in any such arrangement.
    [Show full text]
  • Changemakers: Biographies of African Americans in San Francisco Who Made a Difference
    The University of San Francisco USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center Leo T. McCarthy Center for Public Service and McCarthy Center Student Scholarship the Common Good 2020 Changemakers: Biographies of African Americans in San Francisco Who Made a Difference David Donahue Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.usfca.edu/mccarthy_stu Part of the History Commons CHANGEMAKERS AFRICAN AMERICANS IN SAN FRANCISCO WHO MADE A DIFFERENCE Biographies inspired by San Francisco’s Ella Hill Hutch Community Center murals researched, written, and edited by the University of San Francisco’s Martín-Baró Scholars and Esther Madríz Diversity Scholars CHANGEMAKERS: AFRICAN AMERICANS IN SAN FRANCISCO WHO MADE A DIFFERENCE © 2020 First edition, second printing University of San Francisco 2130 Fulton Street San Francisco, CA 94117 Published with the generous support of the Walter and Elise Haas Fund, Engage San Francisco, The Leo T. McCarthy Center for Public Service and the Common Good, The University of San Francisco College of Arts and Sciences, University of San Francisco Student Housing and Residential Education The front cover features a 1992 portrait of Ella Hill Hutch, painted by Eugene E. White The Inspiration Murals were painted in 1999 by Josef Norris, curated by Leonard ‘Lefty’ Gordon and Wendy Nelder, and supported by the San Francisco Arts Commission and the Mayor’s Offi ce Neighborhood Beautifi cation Project Grateful acknowledgment is made to the many contributors who made this book possible. Please see the back pages for more acknowledgments. The opinions expressed herein represent the voices of students at the University of San Francisco and do not necessarily refl ect the opinions of the University or our sponsors.
    [Show full text]
  • Governor Newsom's Amicus Brief in Mcdaniel
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CAPITAL CASE CALIFORNIA, No. S171393 Plaintiff and Respondent, v. DON’TE LAMONT MCDANIEL, Defendant and Appellant. PROPOSED BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE THE HONORABLE GAVIN NEWSOM IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT MCDANIEL Appeal from Judgment of The Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Case No. TA074274 The Honorable Robert J. Perry, Presiding * ELISABETH SEMEL ERWIN CHEMERINSKY DIRECTOR, DEAN DEATH PENALTY CLINIC (ADMITTED IN ILLINOIS AND (SBN 67484) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA) U.C. Berkeley School of Law U.C. Berkeley School of Law Berkeley, CA 94720-7200 Berkeley, CA 94720-7200 [email protected] [email protected] Telephone: 510-642-0458 Telephone: 510-642-6483 Facsimile: 510-643-4625 Facsimile: 510-642-9893 Document received by the CA Supreme Court. Attorneys for Proposed Amicus Curiae THE HON. GAVIN NEWSOM TABLE OF CONTENTS PROPOSED BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE .................................... 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................................... 2 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES .............................................................. 4 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................. 21 ARGUMENT ..................................................................................... 23 I. THE CALIFORNIA JURY RIGHT SHOULD BE UNDERSTOOD IN THE CONTEXT OF THE HISTORICAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN RACISM AND CAPITAL PUNISHMENT. ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Publication and Depublication of California Court of Appeal Opinions: Is the Eraser Mightier Than the Pencil? Gerald F
    Santa Clara Law Santa Clara Law Digital Commons Faculty Publications Faculty Scholarship 1-1-1992 Publication and Depublication of California Court of Appeal Opinions: Is the Eraser Mightier than the Pencil? Gerald F. Uelmen Santa Clara University School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/facpubs Recommended Citation 26 Loy. L. A. L. Rev. 1007 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Santa Clara Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Santa Clara Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PUBLICATION AND DEPUBLICATION OF CALIFORNIA COURT OF APPEAL OPINIONS: IS THE ERASER MIGHTIER THAN THE PENCIL? Gerald F. Uelmen* What is a modem poet's fate? To write his thoughts upon a slate; The critic spits on what is done, Gives it a wipe-and all is gone.' I. INTRODUCTION During the first five years of the Lucas court,2 the California Supreme Court depublished3 586 opinions of the California Court of Ap- peal, declaring what the law of California was not.4 During the same five-year period, the California Supreme Court published a total of 555 of * Dean and Professor of Law, Santa Clara University School of Law. B.A., 1962, Loyola Marymount University; J.D., 1965, LL.M., 1966, Georgetown University Law Center. The author would like to acknowledge the assistance of Patrick Martucci, J.D., 1993, Santa Clara University School of Law, in the research for this Article.
    [Show full text]
  • The Creative Society Environmental Policymaking in California,1967
    The Creative Society Environmental Policymaking in California,1967-1974 Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Robert Denning Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2011 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Paula M. Baker, Advisor Dr. William R. Childs Dr. Mansel Blackford Copyright By Robert Denning 2011 Abstract California took the lead on environmental protection and regulation during Ronald Reagan‟s years as governor (1967-1974). Drawing on over a century of experience with conserving natural resources, environmentally friendly legislators and Governor Reagan enacted the strongest air and water pollution control programs in the nation, imposed stringent regulations on land use around threatened areas like Lake Tahoe and the San Francisco Bay, expanded the size and number of state parks, and required developers to take environmental considerations into account when planning new projects. This project explains why and how California became the national leader on environmental issues. It did so because of popular anger toward the environmental degradation that accompanied the state‟s rapid and uncontrolled expansion after World War II, the election of a governor and legislators who were willing to set environmental standards that went beyond what industry and business believed was technically feasible, and an activist citizenry that pursued new regulations through lawsuits and ballot measures when they believed the state government failed. The environment had a broad constituency in California during the Reagan years. Republicans, Democrats, students, bureaucrats, scientists, and many businessmen tackled the environmental problems that ii threatened the California way of life.
    [Show full text]
  • The State Bar of California Standing Committee on Professional Responsibility and Conduct Formal Opinion Interim No
    THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA STANDING COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY AND CONDUCT FORMAL OPINION INTERIM NO. 08-0002 ISSUES: Does an attorney violate the duties of confidentiality and competence he or she owes to a client by using technology to transmit or store confidential client information when the technology may be susceptible to unauthorized access by third parties? DIGEST: Whether an attorney violates his or her duties of confidentiality and competence when using technology to transmit or store confidential client information will depend on the particular technology being used and the circumstances surrounding such use. Before using a particular technology in the course of representing a client, an attorney must take appropriate steps to evaluate: 1) the level of security attendant to the use of that technology, including whether reasonable precautions may be taken when using the technology to increase the level of security; 2) the legal ramifications to a third party who intercepts, accesses or exceeds authorized use of the electronic information; 3) the degree of sensitivity of the information; 4) the possible impact on the client of an inadvertent disclosure of privileged or confidential information or work product; 5) the urgency of the situation; and 6) the client‟s instructions and circumstances, such as access by others to the client‟s devices and communications. AUTHORITIES INTERPRETED: Rule 3-100 of the Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of California. Rule 3-110 of the Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of California. California Business and Professions Code section 6068, subdivision (e)(1). STATEMENT OF FACTS Attorney is an associate at a law firm that provides a laptop computer for his use on client and firm matters and which includes software necessary to his practice.
    [Show full text]
  • The Regulation of Lawyer Referral Services: a Preliminary State-By-State Review
    THE REGULATION OF LAWYER REFERRAL SERVICES: A PRELIMINARY STATE-BY-STATE REVIEW Prepared by the American Bar Association Standing Committee on Lawyer Referral and Information Service I. Overview Lawyer Referral Service (LRS) programs across the country provide an efficient mechanism for providing attorneys with direct referrals of potential clients, while also providing access to legal services to typically middle-class Americans who may otherwise lack the knowledge or information necessary to independently seek out counsel. Every state has developed regulatory schemes defining these programs and the parameters for attorney involvement, and in some cases even dictating the operation of LRS programs themselves. A review of the LRS rules in all fifty states undertaken by the ABA Standing Committee on Lawyer Referral and Information Service reveals a broad continuum of regulation of LRS programs across the country. This report summarizes the preliminary findings of this review, with further research ongoing. II. Analysis of State LRS Regulatory Schemes There is a wide variation among the states in the manner in which LRS programs are regulated. The predominant approach involves defining the conditions under which lawyers may participate in LRS programs through court rule; specifically, rules of professional conduct. But there are also states that have court rules defining how LRS programs are to be operated (including two states that engage in regulation via statute in addition to court rule), and the applicability of LRS regulatory approaches are controlled, in part, on how states define “lawyer referral service,” and these definitions often vary. A. The Basis and Focus of LRS Regulation The approaches undertaken by the states in regulating LRS programs may be easily divided into two distinct areas of focus: a focus on regulation of attorney participation in LRS programs, and a focus on regulation of LRS programs themselves.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010-2011 Course Listings
    A n n u a l R e p o r t 2 0 1 UCLA 0 Institute - for Research 2 0 on Labor and 1 Employment 1 Table of Contents Letter from the Director.....................................................................................................................1 About IRLE.........................................................................................................................................2 History................................................................................................................................................3 Governance.........................................................................................................................................5 Governance Structure.......................................................................................................6 IRLE Leadership................................................................................................................8 Department Organization Chart.....................................................................................9 Staff Awards .......................................................................................................................10 Financial Issues .................................................................................................................11 Extramural Support..........................................................................................................12 Academic Activities...........................................................................................................................13
    [Show full text]