1. Introduction

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1. Introduction Chapter 1 – Introduction 1. Introduction The Envision San José 2040 General Plan (General Plan) sets forth a vision and a comprehensive road map to guide the City's growth through the year 2040. The General Plan includes land use policies to shape the transformation of strategically located Growth Areas into higher‐density, mixed‐use, urban areas or "Urban Villages." Urban Villages accommodate employment and housing growth to reduce the environmental impacts of development by promoting transit use, bicycle facilities, and walkability. REGIONAL TRANSIT URBAN VILLAGES The Berryessa BART Urban Village is a designated Regional Transit Urban Village in the City's General Plan. Regional Transit Urban Villages are locations within San José with unique access to major transit facilities. The General Plan directs new job and housing growth to Regional Transit Urban Villages in order to support intensification of the station areas as regional employment destinations. Regional Transit Urban Villages have large public investments in transit facilities and are regionally accessible, therefore offering the highest feasible employment and density concentration. The Berryessa BART Urban Village also has the potential to be a City gateway and a destination for a primary public space in San Jose. This Urban Village is the only one with a surface BART station. The Berryessa BART Urban Village (BBUV) Plan focuses on catalyzing development opportunities that accentuate this potential. The Plan will help attract new development capable of shaping a high‐quality environment unique to this Regional Transit Urban Village. PLANNING AREA Within the City of San José, the Berryessa BART Urban Village is generally located between US Highway 101, Interstate 680, and Interstate 880. The actual boundaries of the Urban Village are generally Shore Drive to the north, Lundy Avenue to the east, Coyote Creek to the west, and Mabury Road to the south. The Berryessa BART Urban Village is located in a transition zone from the suburban residential development on the north and east, to the industrial development of the south and west. The residential neighborhoods to the north and east consist of one and two story track houses built in the 1960’s through the 1980’s. Within the urban village the residential development increases in density and consists of townhouses and small multi‐unit buildings developed in the 2000’s and 2010’s. To the south and west of the urban village the land uses consist of low‐intensity industrial uses and one‐story office parks. Within the urban village commercial uses are limited to the San José Flea Market north side, and commercial uses at the intersection of Berryessa Road and Lundy Road, and King and Maybury Road. Access to the Urban Village is currently provided from the east and west by Berryessa Road, Mabury Road, and from the north and south by Lundy Avenue and King Road. Beginning in 2020, BART began service to the Berryessa/North San José BART Station, providing additional access, and is projected to host 25,000 riders daily by 2030. Future highway interchange improvements are also planned to provide direct access from to US‐Highway 101 to the Urban Village. 1 Chapter 1 – Introduction PLANNING PURPOSE The General Plan places emphasis on placemaking, creating complete communities, and protecting commercial uses in San José, especially in the designated Urban Villages. This Urban Village plan translates the goals of the General Plan to on‐the‐ground policies for the Berryessa/BART Urban Village. This Plan creates a transit node that supports job creation, compact urban design, and housing options. It’s envisioned that this Urban Village will enhance the City’s employment opportunities and be a desirable location to both live and work. Community Engagement The creation of the Berryessa BART Urban Village plan started in Winter 2018 and ended in Fall 2020. The planning process had three key milestones: two community workshops and one open house. The process started with the first community workshop in November 2018, which was held at the Berryessa Community Center. During this workshop the community shared ideas about development in this area and identified values to integrate into the Urban Village Plan. An online engagement portal was also launched at the time of the first workshop to start collecting additional public input. A summary of Opportunities and Constraints was identified early in the planning process (see below). In May 2019, the community provided feedback on key aspects of the Conceptual Plan. The online engagement portal also served to collect input for the second workshop. The final community open house was in November 2020 when the final draft of the Urban Village plan was presented to the public. After final input was received, the City presented the plan to the Planning Commission and City Council in March and April 2021, respectively. OPPORTUNITIES CONSTRAINTS TOD to transform the site into Automobile‐dependent development vibrant Live‐ Work environment at pattern. appropriate density Berryessa and Mabury Road as barriers Enhance existing and planned retail for pedestrian and cyclists. nodes. No access to Coyote Creek and Improve street connections to Penitencia Creek. multiple nearby freeway interchanges. Flooding: Most of urban village area are under flood risk. Propose trails in the Coyote Creek and Penitencia Creek open spaces. Berryessa BART station as a Promote cycling and new temporary end‐of‐the line station. pedestrian connections for a walkable neighborhood. Lack of clear entry‐point access via a freeway interchange. Improve and expand open space resources. BART track line as a physical barrier bisecting the central part of the Generate job and housing Urban Village. opportunities for the area. 2 Chapter 1 – Introduction Technical Advisory Committee This committee included representative from various City departments, the Santa Clara Valley Transit Authority (VTA) and Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART). The group met monthly to coordinate on various urban village planning matters, share information, and make decisions as a group. RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PLANS AND POLICIES The Berryessa BART Urban Village Plan must be consistent with the policies and vision of the General Plan. The General Plan is one of many documents that provide direction to create this vibrant urban village. Other city policies and relevant documents include: . Complete Streets Design Standards & Guidelines The Complete Streets Design Standards & Guidelines were developed comprehensively to guide how the City builds and retrofits streets. The design principles of this document work towards making every street in San José people‐oriented, connected, and resilient. San José Citywide Design Standards and Guidelines The City updated and consolidated its residential, commercial, and industrial design guidelines as one document, entitled “San José Citywide Design Standards and Guidelines” (Citywide DSG), adopted by City Council in February 2021. The Citywide DSG work in conjunction with other City documents and regulations to ensure that buildings throughout San José have high‐quality design and are appropriate for their site, function, and neighborhood. Compliance with the Citywide DSG will be mandatory in the design review process for all applicable developments. Greenprint The Greenprint is a long‐term plan that sets goals and strategies for how San José's parks, trails and community centers will change over the next 20 years. City staff and policy makers use the Greenprint as a guide as they explore the ways the parks system can help people in San José be healthier and happier. Cultural Connection and Public Art San José’s Cultural Plan and Public Art Plan calls for developments to integrate high impact public art and urban design throughout the community. Climate Smart San José Climate Smart San José, approved by the City Council in February 2018, is a plan to reduce carbon emissions, save water, and create a stronger and healthier community. It is a successor to Green Vision, which was adopted in 2007. Climate Smart San José uses the Envision San José 2040 General Plan as a foundation and identifies nine strategies to reduce emissions in San José to reach the State’s target of 80% greenhouse gas emissions reduction below 1990 levels by 2050, as well as achievement the Paris Climate Agreement goals. 3 Chapter 1 – Introduction . Transportation Analysis Policy As of March 2018, thresholds for transportation impacts are measured with Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) instead of intersection Level of Service (LOS). City Council Policy 5‐1 (Transportation Analysis Policy) seeks to reduce VMT by bringing uses in closer proximity and reducing the number of single‐ occupant vehicle trips. 4 Chapter 2 – Vision & Principles 2. Vision & Principles Vision This is year 2040, the Berryessa Urban Village is … A transit‐oriented neighborhood in San Jose, attractive for people and business innovation, with many green spaces and recreational opportunities along the creeks, interconnected network of pedestrian paths, pleasant to bike around, with easy access to public transit. This neighborhood provides much needed housing and jobs near transit, while protecting existing residential areas. People live and work closely together in a vibrant place with placemaking elements designed to foster a sense of community. Principles Six principles help implement the vision for the Berryessa BART Urban Village plan (BBUV) Plan. These principles inform the formulation of
Recommended publications
  • Leisure Center Presso Il Nuovo Polo Fieristico Milanese a Rho -Pero
    Università degli Studi di Pavia Facoltà d’Ingegneria Corso di laurea in Ingegneria edile/architettura LEISURE CENTER PRESSO IL NUOVO POLO FIERISTICO MILANESE A RHO -PERO Tesi di laurea di: Mario Vittorio Serini Relatore: Chiar.mo prof. Angelo Bugatti Correlatore: ing. Roberto De Lotto Marzo 2004 INDICE INTRODUZIONE pag. 5 Sintesi dell’intervento pag. 5 Perché il Leisure Center pag. 8 INSERIMENTO URBANISTICO pag. 11 Localizzazione e inquadramento pag. 13 Ambito d’influenza sovracomunale pag. 15 I margini del progetto Fiera pag. 17 Contesto e carattere del progetto pag. 20 IL TEMA, L’OGGETTO E L’ARCHITETTURA pag. 23 Un’architettura “organica” pag. 25 La prospettiva storica: genealogia del tema pag. 30 La variabile tempo, luoghi e forme pag. 33 Selezione di progetti comparati pag. 39 DAL METAPROGETTO ALL’ORGANISMO EDILIZIO pag. 66 Inquadramento tematico ed economico pag. 67 Dimensionamento e programma funzionale pag. 73 Quadro esigenziale e manutenibilità pag. 78 Rapporto fra struttura e architettura pag. 93 Il sistema bioclimatico e gli impianti pag. 101 Acustica: passi logici operativi pag. 125 PIANO DI LAVORO pag. 134 BIBLIOGRAFIA pag. 138 Sui riferimenti storico-critici pag. 138 Sul tema e sul metodo pag. 140 Sugli aspetti tecnologici pag. 142 Normativa di riferimento pag. 144 Software di calcolo utilizzati pag. 145 INDICE APPENDICI DI CALCOLO (Volume allegato) pag. 146 INDICE ELABORATI GRAFICI (Allegate stampe ridotte) pag. 147 2 IL TEMA, L’OGGETTO E L’ARCHITETTURA Introducendo l’aspetto architettonico del lavoro, occorre segnalare anzitutto il ragionamento relativo all’inquadramento tematico del problema, il suo significato, i precedenti storici. Ne consegue un confronto con progetti assimilabili o per destinazione d’uso o per soluzioni adottate.
    [Show full text]
  • A Master Plan Report OVERFELT GARDENS a Botanical Garden
    A Master Plan Report for OVERFELT GARDENS a botanical garden SAN JOSE CITY COUNCIL Thomas McEnery Mayor Blanca Alvarado Vice-Mayor/District 5 Lu Ryden District 1 Judy Stabile District 2 Susan Hammer District 3 Shirley Lewis District 4 Nancy Ianni District 6 Iola Williams District 7 Patricia Sausedo District 8 James Beall, Jr. District 9 Joe Head District 10 PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION Stanley E. Anderson Chairperson Joseph Guerra III Vice-Chairperson Virginia Holtz Commissioner Dr. Paul Brown Commissioner Ron Wood Commissioner Julie Sabadin Commissioner Jerry Strangis Commissioner Dr. Rodger Cryer Commissioner Charles Walton Commissioner CITY ADMINISTRATION Leslie R. White City Manager Robert G. Overstreet Director of Recreation, Parks and Community Services D. Kent Dewell Director of Public Works MASTER PLAN ELEMENTS.................................................................... 29 The Gardens................ 29 Percolation Ponds..................................................;..........................29 Chinese Cultural Garden................................................ •..................30 Botanical Center................................................................................30 Demonstration Garden.......................................................................30 Conservatory..................................................................................... 31 Orientation / Observation Deck........................................................31 Water Garden...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado St 1121-1123
    1121-1123 COLORADO ST Glendale, CA 91205 A mixed-use retail and automotive property located less than one mile from the Glendale Galleria and Americana at Brand in Glendale, CA Exclusively Listed By: Brandon Michaels Matthew Luchs Senior Managing Director of Investments First Vice President Investments Senior Director, National Retail Group COO of The Brandon Michaels Group Tel: 818.212.2794 Tel: 818.212.2727 [email protected] [email protected] CA License: 01434685 CA License: 01948233 www. BrandonMichaelsGroup .com www. BrandonMichaelsGroup .com Andrew Leff First Vice President Investments Director, National Retail Group Tel: 818.212.2815 [email protected] License #01865688 www. BrandonMichaelsGroup .com 2 04 12 20 Executive Property Area Summary Overview Overview 3 E Colorado St 4 GLENDALE FASHION CENTER S Chevy Chase Dr Executive Summary 5 Executive Summary 6 A mixed-use he Brandon Michaels Group of Marcus & Millichap The property is located one mile from Downtown retail and Thas been selected to exclusively represent for sale Glendale, which is home to two major retail centers; The 1121-1123 East Colorado Street, three freestanding Americana At Brand, and the Glendale Galleria. The automotive buildings on two parcels totaling 5,609 square feet Americana at Brand is home to eighty-two retail stores, property located of building on 9,470 square feet of land. The subject and 242 residential units. The Glendale Galleria is less than one property features a combined total of 75 feet of frontage comprised of 1.6 million square feet of retail space, and along Colorado Street, which sees average daily traffic is the fourth largest mall in Los Angeles County.
    [Show full text]
  • JUNTOS Initiative
    7/9/2020 Print/Preview Powered by ZoomGrants™ Santa Clara Valley Open Space Authority 2020 Urban Grant Program Deadline: 7/1/2020 Santa Clara County Public Health Department JUNTOS Initiative Jump to: Project Description Documents Upload $ 199,955.00 Requested Santa Clara County Public Health Department Submitted: 6/30/2020 11:43:58 AM Telephone408-817-6881 (Pacific) 1775 Story Road, Suite 120 Fax 408-251-4014 San Jose, CA 95122 Web www.sccphd.org Project Contact EIN 94-6000533 Michelle Wexler Senior Health Care Program [email protected] Manager Tel: 408-817-6881 Bonnie Broderick [email protected] Additional Contacts none entered Project Description top Applicant Type 1. What type of organization is this? ✔ Public Agency School or School District 501(c)3 Nonprofit Eligible organization acting as Fiscal Sponsor for another organization 2. Does the application include a fiscal sponsor? If the project includes a fiscal sponsor, the fiscal sponsor must be the applicant. YES ✔ NO Overview https://www.zoomgrants.com/printprop.asp?rfpidu=EAFEEA1775E740ADA668DE61AB8BC94A&propidu=1827D0E2B10C428BBA75DF3417C12D24 1/13 7/9/2020 Print/Preview 3. Which type of grant are you requesting? Small ($10,000 - $39,999) ✔ Large ($40,000 - $250,000) 4. Grant category (check all that apply) Environmental Stewardship and Restoration Parks, Trails, and Public Access ✔ Environmental Education ✔ Urban Agriculture / Food Systems 5. Type of project (check all that apply) Capital improvement (Large projects only) Planning ✔ Program 6. Project Location: Address / Neighborhood What is the physical location of the project? If there is no physical location, please enter "N/A." If the project will be in multiple locations, please list all.
    [Show full text]
  • THE LIST the Largest Franchisers in Ranked by 2018 Budget Los Angeles County
    10 LOS ANGELES BUSINESS JOURNAL JANUARY 1, 2018 NEXT WEEK BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS THE LIST The Largest Franchisers in Ranked by 2018 budget Los Angeles County Rank Business Improvement District Budget Profile Term Major Areas Included Programs and Services Top Executive • name • 2018 • members • length • name • address • 2017 • type • renewal date • title • website (thousands) • city blocks • phone Downtown Santa Monica Inc. $8,639 1,155 20 years Third Street Promenade, Ocean Ave. to clean and safe, marketing and Kathleen Rawson 1 1351 Third Street Promenade, Suite 201 $8,212 prop./merch. 2028 Lincoln Blvd., Santa Monica Freeway to promotions, business development CEO Santa Monica 90401; downtownsm.com 34 Wilshire Blvd. (310) 393-8355 Downtown Center BID 6,640 2,852 10 years Grand Ave., Figueroa St., Seventh St., clean and safe, security, maintenance, Carol E. Schatz 2 600 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 870 6,492 property 2018 Bunker Hill, Financial District, Pershing economic development, marketing CEO, President Los Angeles 90017; downtownla.com 65 Square, Historic Downtown (213) 624-2146 LA Fashion District 5,011 1,000 5 years Broadway to Stanford St., Sixth St. to 17th clean and safe, communication, website, Rena Leddy 3 110 E. Ninth St., Suite A1175 4,570 property 2018 St. streetscaping Executive Director Los Angeles 90079; fashiondistrict.org 100 (213) 488-1153 Downtown Long Beach Alliance1 4,570 4,800 10 years Downtown Long Beach business recruitment and expansion, Kraig Kojian 4 100 W. Broadway, Suite 120 5,241 prop./merch. 2023 clean and safe, advocacy, marketing CEO, President Long Beach 90802; 120 (562) 436-4259 downtownlongbeach.org Hollywood Entertainment District 4,010 528 10 years Hollywood Blvd., Highland Ave., Vine St., security, maintenance, marketing, Kerry Morrison 5 1680 N.
    [Show full text]
  • Office Space for Sublease Adjacent to Old Pasadena & the Paseo
    Office Space for Sublease Adjacent to Old Pasadena & The Paseo 150 East Colorado Boulevard, Pasadena, California Scott Unger Linda Lee Bill Boyd 626.873.1800 626.873.1800 626.873.1800 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] LIC #01855517 LIC #01278768 LIC #00816177 kiddermathews.com 150 East Colorado Boulevard Pasadena, California Highlights 3 story, ±62,286 SF, Class A office building $2.25 per RSF per month fully serviced Convenient access to the 110, 210, and 134 freeways Walking distance to Metro Gold Line stations Fiber optic ready Parking ratio of 3 spaces per 1,000 RSF leased at $90.00 unreserved parking stall per month and $140.00 reserved parking stall per month Walk Score of 94 with nearby restaurants and retail amenities including Old Pasadena and The Paseo STE RSF RATE DESCRIPTION 300 4,000- $2.25/RSF per 13 window offices, conference room, 5,408 month FSG break area, file/storage, reception and open work area. Scott Unger Linda Lee Bill Boyd 626.873.1800 626.873.1800 626.873.1800 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] LIC #01855517 LIC #01278768 LIC #00816177 kiddermathews.com This information supplied herein is from sources we deem reliable. It is provided without any representation, warranty or guarantee, expressed or implied as to its accuracy. Prospective Buyer or Tenant should conduct an independent investigation and verification of all matters deemed to be material, including, but not limited to, statements of income and expenses. Consult your attorney, accountant, or other professional advisor. 150 East Colorado Boulevard Pasadena, California AMENITIES 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of the Draft Eis
    CHAPTER 12: DISTRIBUTION OF THE DRAFT EIS The Draft EIS was transmitted to the officials, agencies, organizations, and individuals listed in this chapter. The Draft EIS is available for review during normal business hours at several libraries in Santa Clara and Alameda counties and at the VTA office at 3331 North First Street, Building B in San Jose. Copies of the document may be obtained by contacting VTA at (408) 321-5789. VTA has notified all property owners/tenants who may be impacted by the Build Alternatives and has advertised the availability of the EIS in local periodicals, including the Fremont Argus, San Jose Mercury News, The Milpitas Post, El Observador, Thoi Boa, and Santa Clara Weekly. See Chapter 11.0: Agency and Community Participation for additional information. 12.1 PUBLIC OFFICIALS Federal Elected Officials The Honorable Nancy Pelosi The Honorable Barbara Boxer U.S. House of Representatives U.S. Senate District 8 501 First Street, Suite 7-600 450 Golden Gate Avenue, 14th Floor Sacramento, CA 95814 San Francisco, CA 94102 The Honorable Diane Feinstein The Honorable Barbara Lee U.S. Senate U.S. House of Representatives 1 Post Street, Suite 2450 District 9 San Francisco, CA 94104 1301 Clay Street, Suite 1000-N Oakland, CA 94612 The Honorable George Miller U.S. House of Representatives The Honorable Ellen Tauscher District 7 U.S. House of Representatives 1333 Willow Pass Road District 10 Concord, CA 94520 2121 North California Boulevard, Suite 555 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Agencies and Organizations Notified of Draft EIS Availability 12-1 Silicon Valley Rapid Transit Corridor EIS The Honorable Jerry McNerney State Elected Officials U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Cunningham Park Regional Park 8 4 183.25 Alum Rock Park 15350 Penitencia Creek Rd
    Developed Council Park Area (in Name Address Park Type District District acres) Lake Cunningham Park Regional Park 8 4 183.25 Alum Rock Park 15350 Penitencia Creek Rd. Regional Park 4 6 77.5 Kelley Park Regional Park 7 7 47.44 Kelley Park - Happy Hollow Park and Zoo Regional Park 7 7 41.57 Penitencia Creek Park Neighborhood Park 4 8 36.65 Emma Prusch Farm Park Regional Park 5 6 36.41 Cataldi Park Neighborhood Park 4 8 33.97 Overfelt Gardens Regional Park 5 6 32.04 Almaden Lake Park 6099 Winfield Blvd Regional Park 10 1 30.4 Guadalupe Gardens Regional Park 3 5 27.23 Watson Park Neighborhood Park 3 5 22.32 Municipal Baseball Stadium Sports Facility 7 7 19.22 Edenvale Garden Park Regional Park 2 2 18.76 Jeffery Fontana Park Neighborhood Park 10 1 18.05 T.J. Martin Park Neighborhood Park 10 1 15.75 Calabazas Park Neighborhood Park 1 3 15.12 Arcadia Ballpark Regional Park 8 4 15.08 P.A.L. Stadium Park Sports Facility 5 6 14.28 Hillview Park Neighborhood Park 5 6 14.04 Willow Street Frank Bramhall Park Neighborhood Park 6 3 13.63 Roosevelt Park Neighborhood Park 3 5 13.62 Flickinger Park Neighborhood Park 4 8 13.53 La Colina Park Neighborhood Park 2 1 12.58 Houge Park Neighborhood Park 9 3 12.22 Evergreen Park Neighborhood Park 8 4 12.1 Capitol Park Neighborhood Park 5 6 11.91 Los Paseos Park Neighborhood Park 2 1 11.8 Fowler Creek Park Neighborhood Park 8 4 11.68 Great Oaks Park Neighborhood Park 2 2 11.54 Groesbeck Hill Park Neighborhood Park 8 4 11.46 John Mise Park Neighborhood Park 1 3 11.45 Backesto Park 13th Street and Empire Street
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix F Flooding and Drainage Assessment
    Appendix F Flooding and Drainage Assessment 870 Market Street, Suite 1278 San Francisco, CA 94102-2906 t. 415-433-4848 Schaaf & Wheeler f. 415-433-1029 CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS s&[email protected] MEMORANDUM TO: Hannah Darst DATE: March 24, 2020 David J. Powers & Associates FROM: Caitlin Gilmore, PE JOB#: DPOW.100.18 SUBJECT: The San Jose Flea Market Mixed Use Development Flooding and Drainage Evaluation Updated INTRODUCTION This memorandum is an update to the previous analysis completed in September of 2005. David J Powers is preparing an EIR to develop 52 acres of residential units and office space with two new bridge crossings to the south side of the previously analyzed Flea Market site, south of Berryessa Road, east of Coyote Creek and adjacent to the new VTA/BART line. In addition to focusing on the south side of Berryessa Road, this update includes several changes which have occurred in the watershed; namely the completion of the BART/VTA track guideway and Berryessa Station, the improvements to Upper Penitencia Creek with bridge replacements and studies of the watershed completed on behalf of VTA and the Santa Clara Valley Water District. In addition, the phase of the Flea Market development on the north side of Berryessa Road is under construction. The objective of this study is to describe the existing flood and drainage conditions at the proposed San Jose Flea Market mixed use development project (north and south), the potential project constraints, and potential impacts of the proposed project. The project area includes Upper Penitencia Creek and is adjacent to Coyote Creek.
    [Show full text]
  • THE FUTURE of the BERRYESSA BART STATION a Rare Chance to Shape Growth Around San Jose’S First BART Station
    THE FUTURE OF THE BERRYESSA BART STATION A rare chance to shape growth around San Jose’s first BART station SPUR ARTICLE Published on July 10, 2014 The primary author of this report was Sarah Karlinsky with assistance from Ratna Amin, Ben Grant, Gabriel Metcalf, Egon Terplan, Leah Toeniskoetter Urban Design and Graphics: Lewis Knight, Jin Zhao, Xiao Wu and Gabriella Folino of Gensler. All images courtesy Gensler unless otherwise noted. Special thanks to all those who reviewed this article. SPUR 654 Mission St., San Francisco, California 94105 www.spur.org SPUR | July 10, 2014 BERRYESSA BART: THE OPPORTUNITY San Jose has a unique chance to shape growth around its first BART station, Berryessa. From Berryessa, the extension of BART into San Jose will potentially include a stop in the Five Wounds neighborhood to the east of downtown, a stop in downtown itself and a stop at San Jose’s Caltrain/Amtrak/high-speed rail station, Diridon. It is a rare opportunity for a city to receive regional rail service like BART. Developing land uses around Berryessa Station that help support BART ridership will be key to the success of this station — and the future of the area around it. This means new development needs to be of the type and intensity that will encourage people to walk from the station to this development and vice versa. Getting the urban design and circulation right will also be key. Will the station area be a place that people feel comfortable walking to and from? Will new buildings meet the street, or will they be inward facing and surrounded by parking? Will sidewalks connect people to where they want to go? Will it be easy to access the BART station by foot, bicycle and other transit, or will there be too many conflicts with cars? Substantial planning has already been done at both Berryessa Station and at the largest adjacent site that could accommodate new development, the San Jose Flea Market, which sits just to the west of the BART station.
    [Show full text]
  • Sanjose___Memorandum
    ARTS COMMISSION: 5-21-18 ITEM: v. i.C. i CITY OF c a SANjOSE______________ Memorandum CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY TO: ARTS COMMISSION FROM: Kerry Adams Hapner SUBJECT: PROPOSED FY 2018-2019 DATE: May 8, 2018 FESTIVAL, PARADE & CELEBRATION GRANT AWARDS Approved DatC /-jcy JC, <9o/s RECOMMENDATION Recommend that the City Council approve the proposed FY 2018-2019 Festival, Parade and Celebration Grant awards specified in Attachment A and subject to the availability of funds appropriated in the City's FY 2018-2019 Operating Budget. BACKGROUND Through the Office of Cultural Affairs (OCA), the City of San Jose provides a limited number of Festival, Parade & Celebration Grant (FPC) awards each year in order to expand access for all City residents to a wide range of cultural experiences in the form of community festivals, parades and celebrations, large and small. These events are often held in public spaces and are always open to the entire public. Most FPC-supported events have free attendance, although a few have fee- based admission to some parts of or the entire event. In various ways, these festivals contribute to the City’s cultural enrichment and economic enhancement, and they help to promote the City to visitors. As noted in the guidelines, FPC funding is granted through a competitive process. Applications are weighed each year by a review panel for their responsiveness to the evaluation criteria published in the program information booklet. ANALYSIS The panel met on March 1 - 2, 2018 to complete its evaluation and was impressed by the overall quality and quantity of cultural offerings in San Jose.
    [Show full text]
  • Semi-Annual Report June 2017
    2000 Measure A Program Semi-Annual Report June 2017 2000 Measure A Program Semi-Annual Report – June 2017 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title Page 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND PROJECT COSTS A. Executive Summary .............................................................................1-2 B. Project Costs .........................................................................................1-5 C. Measure A Fund Exchange ................................................................1..-8 D. Funding................................................................................................1-.9 2 PROJECT SUMMARY REPORTS 1 Silicon Valley Rapid Transit 1. BART SV Program Development Implementation & 2-1-1 Warm Springs 2. BART SV Corridor Establishment and Maintenance ..........................2-1-2 3. Berryessa Extension Project SVBX - Phase 1 ................................2-1-3.... 4 Future Extension to Santa Clara – Phase II and NMF .........................2-1-4 5. BART Core Systems Modifications (BCS) ................................2-........1-5 6. Other Supporting Project ………………………………….. 2-1-6 2. Mineta San Jose Airport People Mover ..............................................2-2 3. Capitol Expressway Light Rail to Eastridge .......................................2-3 4. Low Floor Light Rail Vehicles.............................................................2-4 5. Caltrain – Capacity Improvements & Electrification ...........................2-5 6. Caltrain Service Upgrades ................................................................2...-6
    [Show full text]