Unreached Only Prayer Cards
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Vietnam Detained Khmer-Krom Youth for Distributing the UN DRIP
KKF’s Report April 16, 2021 Vietnam Detained Khmer-Krom Youth for Distributing the UN DRIP On Thursday, September 13, 2007, the General Assembly voted to adopt the United Nations Declarations on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UN DRIP). As a member state, Vietnam signed to adopt this crucial and historical document. Since signing to the adoption of the UN DRIP, Vietnam has continued to deny the existence of the indigenous peoples within its border. Vietnam has labeled the indigenous peoples as the “ethnic minority.” The Khmer-Krom people, the indigenous peoples of the Mekong Delta, have been living on their ancestral lands for thousands of years before the Vietnamese people came to live in the region. Lacking recognition as the indigenous peoples, the Khmer-Krom people have not enjoyed the fundamental rights enshrined in the UN DRIP. Instead of trying to protect and promote the fundamental rights of the indigenous peoples, Vietnam has tried to use all the tactics to make the indigenous peoples invisible in their homeland by not recognizing their true identity. The Khmer-Krom people are not allowed to identify themselves as Khmer-Krom, but being labeled as “Khmer Nam Bo.” Moreover, even Vietnam signed to adopt UN DRIP, but Vietnam has not translated the UN DRIP to the indigenous language and distributed the UN DRIP freely to indigenous peoples. Vietnam is a one-party communist state. Vietnam does not allow freedom of association. As a non- profit organization based in the United States to advocate for the fundamental rights of the voiceless Khmer-Krom in the Mekong Delta, the Khmers Kampuchea-Krom Federation (KKF) has not allowed operating in Vietnam. -
Learning in Action: an Investigation Into Karen Resettlement
LEARNING IN ACTION: AN INVESTIGATION INTO KAREN RESETTLEMENT VIA PARTICIPANT OBSERVATION AND PARTICIPATORY ACTION RESEARCH by DANIEL JOSEPH GILHOOLY (Under the Direction of Ruth Harman) ABSTRACT This qualitative research study is informed by my three and a half years participant observation within one Karen community living in rural eastern Georgia and the result of a participatory action research (PAR) project performed alongside three adolescent Karen brothers from 2010 to 2012. Such a fusion of methodologies is what Nelson and Wright (1995) describe as ‘creative synthesis’ where research is done both with and on participants. The first findings chapter (Chapter Six) analyzes how three adolescent Sgaw Karen brothers use online digital literacies to cope with resettlement. This component of the study explores the digital literacy practices of three adolescent Karen brothers as they attempt to navigate multiple institutions like school. Findings from this study suggest that newly arrived immigrant youth benefit in many social, psychological, and academic ways as a result of their online presence. The study looks specifically at how they use online spaces to (a) maintain and build co-ethnic friendships, (b) connect to the wider Karen Diaspora community, (c) sustain and promote ethnic solidarity and, (d) create and disseminate digital productions. This component of the study offers insights that can help teachers better understand their students’ out-of-school literacy practices and ways they can incorporate such digital literacies in more formal educational contexts. This study also provides findings about Karen resettlement via the collaborative enactment of a participatory action research (PAR) project between these three Karen brothers and myself. -
Gender Dimensions of Development Interventions and Human Security for Indigenous People in Chittagong Hill Tracts
Gender Dimensions of Development Interventions and Human Security for Indigenous People in Chittagong Hill Tracts Shahana Nasrin Ph.D. Researcher (Session: 2011-2012) Registration No. 143 and Associate Professor Institute of Social Welfare and Research University of Dhaka Dhaka-1205 A thesis submitted for the fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Social Welfare Institute of Social Welfare and Research University of Dhaka Dhaka-1205 May 2017 Certificate from the Supervisor This is to certify that the thesis entitled Gender Dimensions of Development Interventions and Human Security for Indigenous People in Chittagong Hill Tracts done by Ms. Shahana Nasrin is an original research work. The views expressed in the thesis are originated from field-based data and is entirely her contribution. The thesis has not been submitted anywhere else for any purposes, e.g., degree or publications. This may be submitted to the examiners to evaluate for conferring the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Social Welfare. (Dr. Muhammad Samad) Professor Institute of Social Welfare and Research University of Dhaka Dhaka-1205 i Declaration I hereby solemnly declare that this thesis represents my own work based on field-based data, except where due acknowledgment is made, and that it has not been previously included in a dissertation or report submitted to any university or other tertiary institution for a degree, diploma or other qualification. (Shahana Nasrin) Ph.D. Researcher (Session: 2011-2012) and Associate Professor Institute of Social Welfare and Research University of Dhaka Dhaka-1205 ii Acknowledgements I would like to express my gratitude and sincere thanks to a number of people and organizations for their cooperation and good advice to complete the study. -
Livelihoods, Integration & Transnationalism in a Protracted
| I LIVELIHOODS, INTEGRATION & TRANSNATIONALISM IN A PROTRACTED REFUGEE SITUATION CASE STUDY: BURMESE REFUGEES IN THAILAND Dissertation presented in fulfilment of the requirements for a Ph.D. degree in Political and Social Sciences, option Political Sciences. INGE BREES Ghent University August 2009 Thesis director: Prof. Dr. Koen Vlassenroot | II | III LIVELIHOODS, INTEGRATION & TRANSNATIONALISM IN A PROTRACTED REFUGEE SITUATION CASE STUDY: BURMESE REFUGEES IN THAILAND Dissertation presented in fulfilment of the requirements for a Ph.D. degree in Political and Social Sciences, option Political Sciences. INGE BREES Ghent University August 2009 Thesis director: Prof. Dr. Koen Vlassenroot | I CONTENT LIST OF TABLES, MAPS AND FIGURES .......................................................................... IV ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................. V ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .............................................................................................. IX INTRODUCTION: HOW THIS RESEARCH FITS INTO THE DEBATES IN REFUGEE STUDIES AND POLICY ................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Two settlement options: Refugee camps or self-settlement ............................... 3 1.2 The livelihoods approach ................................................................................... 7 1.3 Transnationalism and its impact ....................................................................... -
New Beginnings
New Beginnings Refugee Stories - Nelson A Snapshot of Success NEW BEGINNINGS Refugee Stories - Nelson First Published 2012 Nelson Multicultural Council 4 Bridge Street, Nelson PO Box 264, Nelson 7040 ISBN: 978-0-473-21735-8 Copy writing by Alison Gibbs Copy edited by Claire Nichols, Bob Irvine Designed and typeset by Revell Design - www.revelldesign.co.nz Printed by Speedyprint - www.speedyprint.co.nz Contents INTRODUCTION ...................................................................1 Van Ro Hlawnceu Mal Sawm Cinzah REFUGEE RESETTLEMENT IN NEW ZEALAND ..........2 Van Hlei Sung Lian ............................................................ 11 REFUGEE COMMUNITIES IN NELSON ..........................3 THE ETHNIC COMMUNITIES IN NELSON ................. 12 REFUGEE PROFILES ............................................................4 Burma .................................................................................... 12 Beda and Chandra Dahal .................................................4 Burmese ................................................................................ 12 Trang Lam ...............................................................................5 Chin ........................................................................................ 12 Theresa Zam Deih Cin .........................................................5 Zomi Innkuan ...................................................................... 13 Govinda (Tika) Regmi..........................................................6 Kayan .................................................................................... -
Migration, Trafficking & Exploitation of Women In
NO STATUS: MIGRATION, TRAFFICKING & EXPLOITATION OF WOMEN IN THAILAND Health and HIV/AIDS Risks for Burmese and Hill Tribe Women and Girls A Report by Physicians for Human Rights © Physicians for Human Rights, Boston, MA June 2004 Printed in the United States of America. All rights reserved Report Design: Visual Communications/www.vizcom.org Cover Photo: Paula Bronstein/Liaison CONTENTS Acknowledgments .......................................................................v Glossary ....................................................................................vii I. Executive Summary ...........................................................1 II. Introduction.......................................................................7 III. Thailand Background......................................................11 IV. Burma Background..........................................................19 V. Project Methodology .......................................................25 VI. Findings...........................................................................27 Hill Tribe Women and Girls in Thailand..........................28 Burmese Migrant Women and Girls in Thailand..............33 VII. Law and Policy – Thailand..............................................45 VIII. Applicable International Human Rights Law ..................51 IX. Law and Policy – United States .......................................55 X. Conclusion and Expanded Recommendations .................59 iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This report was written by Karen Leiter, JD, -
Nominalization and Related Phenomena in Marma1
Nominalization and Related Phenomena in Marma 105 7 Nominalization and Related Phenomena in Marma1 Huziwara Keisuke Kyoto University 1. Introduction Marma is a dialect of Arakanese, a Southwestern variety of Burmese. It is spoken mainly in the Chittagong Hill Tracts (henceforth CHT), Bangladesh, where the population of Marma speaking people is 154,216 (1991 Census2). In India, Marma is commonly known as Mogh and the corresponding population is 30,559 (2001 Census3). There are hardly any linguistic reports on Marma/Mogh, except for Konow (1903), Bernot (1958; 1966), Huziwara (2003) and Maggard et al. (2007). 1 This paper is a thoroughly revised version of my presentation under the same title at NEILS 3. The text in Marma attached to the original appendix in this paper is omitted owing to space constraints. I am indebted to an anonymous reviewer for his/her detailed comments on the first draft, to Atsuhiko Kato, Mark W. Post and Sawada Hideo for their comments on the second draft, and to Mark W. Post for his comments on the third draft. This study was partly supported by the Grants-in-Aid for JSPS Fellows from the Ministry of Educa- tion, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan for the research entitled ‘Indoken to sinaken kara mita tyakkugo no kizyutu to hikakugengogakuteki kenkyuu’. 2 It is strange but the Population Census of Bangladesh 2001 no longer lists any tribal population, so the latest official tribal figure is that of 1991 (BBS 2002: 143). 3 This figure is available from a webpage of the Census of India, http://www. -
Submission on Self-Determination Under the UN Declaration on The
Submission on Self-Determination under the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples to the Expert Mechanism on the rights of indigenous peoples Table of Contents 1 Overview............................................................................................................................................3 1.1 Summary....................................................................................................................................3 1.2 The submitting organization......................................................................................................4 2 Self determination themes................................................................................................................4 2.1 Peace and Self-Determination...................................................................................................4 2.2 Compromised spaces.................................................................................................................7 2.3 Disenfranchisement of unrepresented peoples........................................................................8 2.4 Criminalization of self-determination movements..................................................................11 2.5 International trade and self-determination.............................................................................12 2.6 Indigenous land: commerce and climate.................................................................................13 3 Conclusion.......................................................................................................................................15 -
Tourism, Land Grabs and Displacement
Tourism, Land Grabs and Displacement A Study with Particular Focus on the Global South Andreas Neef Auckland, February 2019 Disclaimer: The views expressed in this study are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Tourism Watch. Photo on Cover: Coastal construction work for a tourist resort in Phang Nga Province, southern Thailand (Source: Author) ii Table of Contents Table of Contents iii List of Tables, Figures, Photos and Boxes vi List of Abbreviations ix Acknowledgements xiii Preface xiii Executive Summary xiv Chapter 1. Introduction 1 1.1 The Context: Global Rush for Land and Tourism-Related Land Grabs 1 1.2 Tourism-Related Land and Resource Grabbing within the Global Land Grab Debate 2 1.3 Global Scope and Local Contexts for Tourism-Related Land Grabs 4 1.4 Study Design, Case Selection and Analytical Framework 5 1.5 Structure of the Study 7 Chapter 2. Tourism-Related Land Grabs: Actors, Drivers, Discourses, Mechanisms, Practices and Impacts 9 2.1 Actors and Drivers 9 2.2 Discourses and Mechanisms 11 2.3 Practices and Impacts of Tourism-Related Land Grabs 13 Chapter 3. State-Led Tourism Development and Tourism Zoning 18 3.1 Tourism Zone Development in the Philippines 18 3.2 The Special Economic Zone of Social Market Economy in Oecusse, Timor Leste 23 3.3 State-Driven Tourism Development and Livelihood Displacement among Garifuna Communities, Honduras 25 3.4 Concessional Tourism Development: A Chinese Mega-Project in Koh Kong Province, Cambodia 27 Chapter 4. Resort Development, Residential Tourism and Resource Grabbing 31 4.1 Resort Tourism and Resource Grabbing in the Indonesian Archipelago 31 4.2 Tourism Enclaves and Proliferation of Land Leases in the Southwest Pacific – The Case of Vanuatu 38 4.3 Residential Tourism and Transnational Land Investment in Central America and the Southern Indian Ocean 42 Chapter 5. -
Culture & History Story of Cambodia
CHAM CULTURE & HISTORY STORY OF CAMBODIA FARINA SO, VANNARA ORN - DOCUMENTATION CENTER OF CAMBODIA R KILLEAN, R HICKEY, L MOFFETT, D VIEJO-ROSE CHAM CULTURE & HISTORY STORYﺷﻤﺲ ISBN-13: 978-99950-60-28-2 OF CAMBODIA R Killean, R Hickey, L Moffett, D Viejo-Rose Farina So, Vannara Orn - 1 - Documentation Center of Cambodia ζរចងាំ និង យុត្ិធម៌ Memory & Justice មជ䮈មណ䮌លឯក羶រកម្宻ᾶ DOCUMENTATION CENTER OF CAMBODIA (DC-CAM) Villa No. 66, Preah Sihanouk Boulevard Phnom Penh, 12000 Cambodia Tel.: + 855 (23) 211-875 Fax.: + 855 (23) 210-358 E-mail: [email protected] CHAM CULTURE AND HISTORY STORY R Killean, R Hickey, L Moffett, D Viejo-Rose Farina So, Vannara Orn 1. Cambodia—Law—Human Rights 2. Cambodia—Politics and Government 3. Cambodia—History Funding for this project was provided by the UK Arts & Humanities Research Council: ‘Restoring Cultural Property and Communities After Conflict’ (project reference AH/P007929/1). DC-Cam receives generous support from the US Agency for International Development (USAID). The views expressed in this book are the points of view of the authors only. Include here a copyright statement about the photos used in the booklet. The ones sent by Belfast were from Creative Commons, or were from the authors, except where indicated. Copyright © 2018 by R Killean, R Hickey, L Moffett, D Viejo-Rose & the Documentation Center of Cambodia. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. -
Protection Space in Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia, Cambodia and the Philippines
The Search Protection Space in Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia, Cambodia and the Philippines First published 2012 A PDF version of this All rigths reserved. Printed by Clung book is available at No part of this Wicha Press Co, Ltd. By JRS Asia Paci!c www.jrsap.org publication may be 43 Soi Rachwithi 12, reproduced, stored Publisher: Fr Bernard Victory Monument, Original language: in a retrieval system, Hyacinth Arputhasamy Phayathai, Bangkok English or transmitted, in any SJ 10400 Thailand form or by any means, © JRS Asia Paci!c electronic, mechanical, Designer: Molly Mullen ISBN photoopying, recording and/or otherwise without the prior permission of the publishers Foreword Fr Bernard Hyacinth Arputhasamy SJ........................................................................ 1 List of terms Abbreviations used in this text............................................................................... 3 Introduction Chapter one Protection concerns............................................................................................... 9 Chapter two Chapter three Chapter four Conclusion Resources Index “When I was 3 years old, I was displaced. Now, my son is 3 years old, and he is displaced. His mother died on our journey from Sri Lanka by boat. I am doing Foreword this for his children, so they won’t have to be displaced.” – Kasun, Sri Lanka “Why would someone leave one’s own home, land, family and country to go to anoth- er?” A group of primary school students were asked during a recent trip to Australia. By Bernard Hyacinth Many enthusiastic hands were raised with answers like these: because they want to Arputhasamy, SJ run away from violence and war, it is not safe in their own country, it is dangerous and life-threatening, to seek a better life, because of poverty, there is no education and Regional Director chance to work, to start a new life, and the like. -
Rapid Education & Risk Analysis Cox's Bazar
RAPID EDUCATION & RISK ANALYSIS COX’S BAZAR October 2018 DISCLAIMER: THE VIEWS EXPRESSED IN THIS PUBLICATION DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF THE UNITED STATES AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT OR THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT. CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 5 INTRODUCTION 6 RERA METHODOLOGY 7 CONTEXT: NATIONAL LEVEL 14 CONTEXT: COX’S BAZAR DISTRICT 19 CONTEXT: THE EDUCATION SECTOR 28 RERA FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS 35 CONCLUSIONS 58 RECOMMENDATIONS 62 ANNEX 64 ENDNOTES 66 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PURPOSE USAID/Bangladesh commissioned a Rapid Education and Risk Analysis (RERA) to understand the impact of the Rohingya influx on pre-primary through secondary education in Bangladeshi schools in Cox’s Bazar. The specific objectives of the RERA were to (i) gain a broader understanding of the risks, needs, assets, and capacities of the education sector in Cox’s Bazar, and (ii) inform education programming to support Bangladeshis in Cox’s Bazar, particularly host and impacted communities. METHODOLOGY A RERA is a “good enough” qualitative situation analysis that examines the education sector, the learners, and the community as a dynamic system of multiple contextual risks and assets. The RERA in Cox’s Bazar was conducted in October 2018 and focused on the situation of Bangladeshis in a limited, purposive primary data sample of schools in 32 communities in 6 upazilas (sub-districts) across Cox’s Bazar: Ukhiya, Teknaf, Ramu, Cox’s Bazar Sadar, Maheshkhali, and Pekua. The RERA reached 900 respondents through 141 focus group discussions and 33 key informant interviews. CONTEXT The rapid influx of more than 727,0001 Rohingya people from Myanmar since August 2017 presented a shock to the communities in Cox’s Bazar, a diverse district already under significant stress.