DOCSLIB.ORG

A40 Congestion on A40 West of Gloucester

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A40 Congestion on A40 West of Gloucester ENVIRONMENT AND COMMUNITIES SCRUTINY COMMITTEE 4 March 2015 INFORMATION REPORT: Congestion on the A40 West Of Gloucester 1.0 Background At the Environment and Communities Scrutiny Committee meeting on 12 November 2014, members asked for a discussion regarding the A40 West of Gloucester, aimed at resolving the congestion experienced on this route, particularly during am peak periods. The A40, from Junction 11 of the M5, west towards the County Boundary, is a trunk road, and is part of the Government’s Strategic Road Network. This means that the Highways Agency (HA), on behalf of the Government, looks after the road, including maintenance and improvement. Traffic flows on the A40 are the second highest in the County, (second only to the A40 Golden Valley Bypass), with high congestion levels. Congestion is experienced most morning peak hours, with queues frequently stretching down the A48 towards Minsterworth and west of Highnam roundabout on the A40. The HA are currently constructing a capacity improvement scheme at the Over roundabout, as part of its ‘pinchpoint’ programme of congestion reducing schemes. This will be completed by the end of March 2015 and is designed to make improvements to the capacity of the roundabout. The following plan, taken from the Local Transport Plan consultation document 2015-2013 (Cabinet version) shows the traffic flows on key routes within the Forest of Dean and shows a flow of 38,508 on the A40 at the Over Roundabout. 2.0 Current Strategy for the A40 The following outlines the current strategy for resolving the congestion issues on the A40. 2.1 Gloucestershire Local Transport Board (GLTB) scheme at Over roundabout In addition to the HA’s improvement scheme above, the County Council is developing a more comprehensive improvement to this junction. As part of the devolution of major scheme funding from central Government to Local Highway Authorities the County Council submitted a bid to the GLTB for an improvement to Over roundabout. The bid was for £2.23m of funding to improve the roundabout and also to investigate the removal of the hatching that is currently in place at Highnam Lodge. As a result of ongoing discussions with the Highways Agency, about the removal of the hatching, this has now been dropped from the GLTB scheme. The removal of the hatching will be discussed further later in this report. The table below sets out the details of the schemes, which are currently programmed for construction in 2017/18 Location Description of improvement Over Rbt – A40W Signalise the A40W entry to the roundabout, from Ross-on-Wye and circulatory carriageway Over Rbt – A417S Signalise the A417S entry to the roundabout and circulatory carriageway Over Rbt – A40E Widening of the A40E entry to provide three lanes at the stop line Over Rbt – A417N Widening of the A417N entry to provide three lanes at the stop line Over Rbt Adding a third circulating lane on the roundabout Traffic modelling indicates that, without intervention, delays could increase significantly - by up to 156%, on the A40 eastbound approach, AM peak, in a 2022 forecast year compared to a 2007 base (see Tables below). Increased journey times and congestion would have an adverse impact on achieving the LTP goals – in particular, it would constrain the delivery of sustainable economic growth, with deterioration in the quality of strategic transport connections between the Forest of Dean to Gloucester, and beyond. The lack of capacity would act as a constraint to planned growth, compromise the efficient movement of people and goods and have a detrimental impact on the attractiveness of the area to businesses. Access to jobs, including at Gloucester and major employment sites such as Innsworth, would be compromised. As congestion increases, there are also likely to be greater environmental challenges from increased carbon emissions and deterioration in local air quality. The following tables set out the results of the traffic modelling of Over roundabout at a base year of 2007 and a forecast year of 2022, without any improvements made to the roundabout. The table shows the queue on the approach to Over roundabout increasing from 273 to 695 in the am peak, with delay increasing from 9 minutes to nearly 25 minutes. Modelled traffic results at Over Roundabout (2007 base year) Source: A40 Over and Longford Roundabouts: Improvement Assessment Report (2007) Modelled forecast traffic results at Over Roundabout (2022 base year) Source: A40 Over and Longford Roundabouts: Improvement Assessment Report (2007) 2.1.1 Highnam Lodge Hatching The initial scope of the A40 Over roundabout scheme included the removal of lane restrictions at Highnam Lodge, locally known as ‘Linton Lodge hatchings’. These are located on the eastbound A40 (Highways Agency [HA] maintained) between the A40/A48 roundabout and the B4215 junction. The hatchings run for approximately 300m on the inside lane of the dual carriageway. It was believed that the hatchings were originally installed by the HA to allow the safe entry and exit of vehicles from the Linton Lodge residential property owing to the high A40 eastbound approach speeds and poor forward visibility (or stopping sight distance) offered by the left lane. By hatching out a section of this nearside lane and forcing all traffic into the adjacent offside (right) lane, a greater forward visibility distance is attained which is more suited to the speed of road. However, more recent research, including a meeting with the owner of Linton Lodge (22/10/14) and further conversation with the HA, has revealed that this A40 nearside lane hatching was in existence prior to Linton Lodge being developed, and continued eastwards past the site access towards the A40/B4215 traffic signals junction. It is now evident that the hatching was originally introduced by the HA for safety reasons, to protect vehicles queuing back from the traffic lights owing to the substandard visibility on the approaching bend in the vicinity of Linton Lodge. Whilst the Linton Lodge access benefits from the hatching, it is not and was never the primary reason for their installation. Removal of the hatching, to allow vehicles to utilise both eastbound carriageway lanes, would require resolution of the afore mentioned forward visibility issues concerning the queue for the B4215 traffic lights as well as access to Linton Lodge. Simply moving the Lodge access to another location along this road section, or providing an additional set of traffic lights at the access (originally promoted as part of the GLTB scheme) is therefore no longer considered a safe or satisfactory solution. Options appraisal Based on current ordinance survey plans, the following options for removal of the hatching may be considered. 1. Provide a forward visibility splay sufficient for the current speed of the road (50mph). This could require the purchase of land. 2. Realign the carriageway by widening into the central reserve, provide a merge lane for the lodge, remove vegetation and reduce speeds to 30mph. 3. Realign the carriageway by widening into the central reserve, provide a merge lane for the lodge, remove vegetation, purchase land, demolish and rebuild Linton Lodge boundary wall, and reduce the speeds to 40mph. All of the above options would have significant budget implications and Options 1 & 3 would require land purchase (and possible CPO should the Lodge owner be unwilling to negotiate on any sale). In addition, an informal discussion with the Police, (as part of the Highways Agency’s A40 Route Congestion Study 2011) suggests that they would be unwillingly to support a TRO to reduce the speed limit to 40mph as it would be difficult to enforce. This is because the existing carriageway is of a high standard and barriers are present. This causes a driver perception that even the existing speed limit of 50mph is unnecessarily low for the road. Furthermore, in recent meetings with GCC Officers, HA representatives have indicated that they are unlikely to support the lowering of the speed limit on the trunk road given its arterial status. On site observations and previous traffic modelling (done by both GCC and the HA) give a high level of confidence that the average eastbound journey time from the Forest of Dean to A40/A417 Over roundabout would not be reduced during the morning peak period by the removal of the hatching at Linton Lodge. This is primarily because vehicle queues currently block back into Highnam roundabout and regularly extend back well beyond the roundabout on both the A40 (towards Birdwood) and A48 (towards Minsterworth) approaches. While the queues would obviously be shorter on the A40 and A48 if the hatching was removed, average journey times would not be reduced as any gaps that occur in this queue for any reason are always filled well before Over roundabout, so the roundabout always operates at full capacity. Previous traffic modelling and observations undertaken both by the GCC and the HA on the A40 corridor from West of Severn towards Gloucester have shown that while delay and congestion occurs at the A40/B4215 traffic signals junction during the AM weekday peak period, the A40/A417 Over Roundabout is the cause of the queues into Gloucester, with traffic regularly blocking back upstream affecting the A40, A48 and B4215. This is due to the insufficient capacity of the existing A40 Over junction, the level of opposing traffic turning movements on key approach arms, the limited junction visibility and poor management of existing traffic movements (lack of road markings, signing etc.). To summarise, at present, contrary to driver perception, the hatching has little to no effect on the vehicle journey times from the Forest of Dean into Gloucester during the morning peak period. However, future capacity improvements to A40/A417 Over Roundabout are planned for early 2015 (HA’s western arm widening scheme) and our proposed scheme for Spring 2017 (GCC’s GLTB Major Improvement Scheme, widening of approaches and possible signalisation), the latter of which should significantly reduce queuing and delays on this route into Gloucester.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Value for Money Integration in the Renegotiation of Public Private Partnership Road Projects by Ajibola Oladipo Fatokun
    Value for Money Integration in the Renegotiation of Public Private Partnership Road Projects By Ajibola Oladipo Fatokun A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment for the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Central Lancashire October 2018 i STUDENT DECLARATION I declare that while registered as a candidate for the research degree, I have not been a registered candidate or enrolled student for another award of the University or other academic or professional institution I declare that no material contained in the thesis has been used in any other submission for an academic award and is solely my own work Signature of Candidate: ____________________________________________________ Type of Award: ________________________ PhD _______________________ School: ______________________ Engineering ____________________ ii ABSTRACT The governments of various countries have continued to adopt Public Private Partnership (PPP) for infrastructure projects delivery due to its many advantages over the traditional procurement method. However, concerns have been raised by stakeholders about the viability of PPP to deliver Value for Money (VfM), especially for the client. These discussions have generated debates and arguments in policy and advisory documents within the last decade mainly in the renegotiation of PPP water and transport projects and their VfM implications. Poor or non-achievement of VfM in PPP contracts renegotiation has led to this study in PPP road projects with the overall aim of integrating VfM considerations into the renegotiation process of PPP road projects. Mixed methodology research approach is used to achieve the objectives set for the study. Interviews and questionnaires of professionals involved in Design-Build-Finance-Operate (DBFO) road projects in the UK are used in the study.
    [Show full text]
  • 4542 the London Gazette, 21 August, 1953
    4542 THE LONDON GAZETTE, 21 AUGUST, 1953 Railway Line by way of an overhead reinforced Standish—Hope Cottage, Gloucester Road, Stone- concrete footbridge with approaches. house. A certified copy of the Order and of the map con- Tirley—Torsend Cottage, Tirley. tained in the Order as confirmed by the Minister has Twigworth—c/o Mr. E. J. Jones, Far End, Twig- been deposited at the Council Offices, Argyle Road* worth. Sevenoaks, and will be open for inspection free of Upton St. Leonards—'Village Hall, Upton St. charge between the hours of 9 a.m. and 5.30 p.m. on Leonards. Weekdays and between 9 a.m. and 12 noon on Westbury-on-Severn—Lecture Hall, Westbury-on- Saturday. Severn. The Order becomes operative as from 'the 21st Whitminster—c/o iMr. A. E. Wyer, The Garage, day of August, 1953, but if any person aggrieved Whitminster. by the Order desires to question the validity thereof In exceptional circumstances special arrangements or of any provision contained therein on the grounds will be made for the draft map and statement to be that it is not within the powers of the National Parks inspected out of office hours. and Access to the Countryside Act, 1949, or on the Any objection or representation with respect to ground -that any requirement of the Act or any the draft map or statement may be sent in writ- regulation made thereunder has not been complied ing to the undersigned before the 30th day of April, with in relation to the approval of the Order he 1954, and any such objection or representation should may.
    [Show full text]
  • 5304 Study of Land Surrounding Key
    Study of land surrounding Key Settlements in Cotswold District: Update Additional Sites 2015: Final Report to Cotswold District Council November 2015 Tel: 029 2043 7841 Email: [email protected] Web: www.whiteconsultants.co.uk Cotswold District Council Study of land surrounding Key Settlements in Cotswold District Update CONTENTS page PART 1 1 Introduction 3 2 Summary of findings 4 Tables Table 1 Additional sites landscape sensitivity: Housing/small scale mixed development PART 2 3 Site sensitivities Sites are considered in turn in settlement order with associated figures Andoversford 7 Down Ampney 10 Fairford 13 Lechlade 15 Mickleton 18 Moreton-in-Marsh 20 Northleach 22 Siddington 24 South Cerney 27 Stow-on-the-Wold 31 Tetbury 33 Willersey 36 Cover photo- Field adjacent to a development site north of Cirencester Road, Tetbury White Consultants 1 Additional sites 2015 final/021115 Cotswold District Council Study of land surrounding Key Settlements in Cotswold District Update PART 1 White Consultants 2 Additional sites 2015 final/021115 Cotswold District Council Study of land surrounding Key Settlements in Cotswold District Update 1. Introduction 1.1. White Consultants were appointed by Cotswold District Council in April 2014 to undertake an update of the landscape assessment around key settlements1 undertaken in 2000. 1.2. The scope of the study was to update the assessment taking into account the impact of any physical change since 2000, any revised assessments, policies and up-to-date guidance and focussing on the strategic housing land availability assessment (SHLAA) sites coming forward. The sites considered in this report are new sites that have been put forward for inclusion into the update of the SHLAA that is currently being carried out by Cotswold District Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Tewkesbury Borough Council
    TEWKESBURY BOROUGH COUNCIL rs L::< Council Offices, Gloucester Road, TEWK.ESBUR Y, G L20 5TT W.W . STRACHAN Telephone TEWKESBURY (0684) · 2950 10 B.Sc., M.Sc., M.R.T .P.l. This matter is being dealt with by ....• '.:.~~.: ...~ .~.~ ~.~. ~~.~.. ••........... Ext . .....~}.~ .~---···· Borough Planning Officer Your Ref. Our Ref. JW/RJC/T G.2 775/ K 20t h February , 1987 ~-.. < For information Highnam Court, Highnam ) Outline application for the erection of a retirement village, hotel and opera box including the Highnam Court House and gardens. Construction of a new vehicular and pedestrian access. The above application was considered by Committe on 17th February, 1987. i-, , . Members resolved, after considerable debate, to accept the ' proposals in principle and NOT REFUSE the applica .t i on subject to the application being advertised in the press as a material departure from the provisions of the County Structure Plan and the Gloucester North Environs Local Plan. Proposals will, after advertising, need to be referred to the Department of .the · Environment before any formal determination . • The Department of the ;,. .. ( Environment can either call in the application for their determination or allow the Authority to determine as they see fit. You will be notified when a final decision has been made. ' ~. i )._· Cr-/--~ · ,, [f-~ Agenda Item 4(d) ' Planning Committee . 8' 17th March,1987 . REPORT OF CHIEF OFFICERS MANAGEMENTTEAM ~:' (INITIATED BY BOROUGHPLANNING OFFICER) HIGHNAMCOURT: PROPOSED-RETIREMENTCOMPLEX (Tfr.2775/K) STATEMENTOF BOROUGHCOUNCIL'S SUPPORT . El- Background On 20th February,1987 the Borough Planning Committee elected not to refuse an outline application for the erection of a retirement village, hotel and opera box at the above site.
    [Show full text]
  • Land South of Oakridge, Highnam, Gloucestershire, Gl2 8Ef Application Ref: 16/00486/Out
    Our ref: PCU/APP/G1630/W/3184272 David Jones Your ref: 13475 Evans Jones Ltd Royal Mews St. Georges Place Cheltenham Gloucestershire 20 December 2018 G50 3PQ Dear Sir, TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 – SECTION 78 APPEAL MADE BY R KEENE AND SONS LAND SOUTH OF OAKRIDGE, HIGHNAM, GLOUCESTERSHIRE, GL2 8EF APPLICATION REF: 16/00486/OUT 1. I am directed by the Secretary of State to say that consideration has been given to the report of H Baugh-Jones BA (Hons) DipLA MA CMLI, who held a public local inquiry on 22-25 May 2018 into your client’s appeal against the decision of Tewkesbury Borough Council to refuse your client’s application for outline planning permission for the erection of 40 dwellings with all matters reserved except access, in accordance with application ref: 16/00486/OUT, dated 3 May 2016. 2. On 4 July 2018, this appeal was recovered for the Secretary of State's determination, in pursuance of section 79 of, and paragraph 3 of Schedule 6 to, the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. Inspector’s recommendation and summary of the decision 3. The Inspector recommended that the appeal be dismissed, and planning permission refused. 4. For the reasons given below, the Secretary of State agrees with the Inspector’s conclusions, and agrees with his recommendation. He has decided to dismiss the appeal and refuse planning permission. A copy of the Inspector’s report (IR) is enclosed. All references to paragraph numbers, unless otherwise stated, are to that report. Procedural matters 5. On 26 October 2018, Government published “Technical consultation on updates to national planning policy and guidance”, dealing with the calculation of Local Housing Need and other matters.
    [Show full text]
  • Faringdon, Wantage & Wallingford
    CONTENTS 5.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 2 5.2 History of the Route ......................................................................................................... 2 5.2.1 Stanford Road ................................................................................................... 2 5.2.2 Icknield Way/Portway ....................................................................................... 3 5.2.3 Wallingford Road .............................................................................................. 4 5.2.4 Early use of the Road ........................................................................................ 5 5.3 The First Act .................................................................................................................... 6 5.4 Implementing the Act ...................................................................................................... 7 5.5 Later Acts ......................................................................................................................... 7 5.6 Wallingford Toll-Bridge .................................................................................................. 9 5.7 The Trustees ..................................................................................................................... 10 5.8 Trust Officers and Finance............................................................................................... 11
    [Show full text]
  • APPLICATION NO: 07/0081/GLMAJW VALIDATION 20Th November DATE: 2007 DISTRICT REF: AGENT: P E Duncliffe Ltd, Stonecroft, Park Road, Nailsworth, GL6 0HW
    APPLICATION NO: 07/0081/GLMAJW VALIDATION 20th November DATE: 2007 DISTRICT REF: AGENT: P E Duncliffe Ltd, Stonecroft, Park Road, Nailsworth, GL6 0HW APPLICANT: Allstone Sand and Gravels, Myers Road, Gloucester, GL1 3QD SITE: Allstone House, Myers Road, Gloucester, GL1 3QD PROPOSAL: Variation of Condition 7 of Planning Permission 05/01126/FUL to allow the door on the east elevation to be used in association with the waste transfer station. PARISH OF N/A SITE AREA: 0.75 Ha GRID REF: 384687 218258 That planning permission be granted for the RECOMMENDED: reasons set out in this report and summarised at paragraphs 7.8–7.13, and subject to the conditions set out in section 8 of this report. 1.0 LOCATION 1.1 Allstone House is a portal steel frame warehouse building, 120m long and 30m wide, set on a 0.75 ha site within the built up area of Gloucester. The building accommodates a waste transfer station handling household, commercial and industrial wastes including putrescible and hazardous wastes. 1.2 The application site lies a short distance to the east of the city centre on former railway land immediately north of the main Gloucester to Birmingham railway. Access to the site is derived from a short private road that joins Myers Road to the west which in turn links with the A3042 Metz Way via Horton Road. Vehicles enter through a gateway in the north western corner of the fenced site and waste lorries track right to enter the building on the southern elevation. After depositing their load they leave via the same entrance and continue around the building in an anti-clockwise direction to leave via the gateway.
    [Show full text]
  • Promoter Organisation Name Works Reference Address 1 Address 2
    Promoter Organisation Works Reference Address 1 Address 2 Works Location Works Type Traffic Management Start End Works Status Works C/W Name GLOUCESTERSHIRE CARRIAGEWAY TYPE 4 - UP TO EY102-GH1902000001769 SPOUT LANE ABENHALL Spout Lane, Abenhall MINOR GIVE & TAKE 28/01/2020 28/01/2020 PROPOSED WORKS COUNTY COUNCIL 0.5 MS CARRIAGEWAY TYPE 4 - UP TO Gigaclear KA030-CU004986 GRANGE COURT ROAD ADSETT Left hand fork by post box to By the right hand sign post STANDARD GIVE & TAKE 20/01/2020 31/01/2020 IN PROGRESS 0.5 MS CARRIAGEWAY TYPE 4 - UP TO Gigaclear KA030-CU005493 51488 ALDERLEY TO NEWMILLS FARM ALDERLEY Turning With Mount House On It to Outside Old Farm MINOR GIVE & TAKE 23/01/2020 27/01/2020 PROPOSED WORKS 0.5 MS CARRIAGEWAY TYPE 4 - UP TO Gigaclear KA030-CU005494 THE OLD RECTORY TO THE FURLONGS ALDERLEY 200m Before The Gate House to End Of The Road MINOR GIVE & TAKE 23/01/2020 27/01/2020 PROPOSED WORKS 0.5 MS PRIVATE STREET (NO DESIGN. Bristol Water AY009-2561804 WINTERSPRING LANE ALDERLEY OUTSIDE KINERWELL COTTAGE MINOR GIVE & TAKE 28/01/2020 30/01/2020 PROPOSED WORKS INFO. HELD) Thames Water Utilities LAYBY BY REAR OF EAGLE LINE, UNIT 3, ANDOVERSFORD CARRIAGEWAY TYPE 2 - 2.5 TO MU305-000031399394-001 A40 FROM ANDOVERSFORD BY PASS TO A436 ANDOVERSFORD MINOR TWO-WAY SIGNALS 25/01/2020 29/01/2020 PROPOSED WORKS Ltd INDUSTRIAL ESTATE,GLOUCESTER ROAD, ANDOVERSFORD, C 10 MS CARRIAGEWAY TYPE 4 - UP TO Gigaclear KA030-CU005381 ARLINGHAM ROAD ARLINGHAM Outside The Villa to Outside St Mary Church STANDARD MULTI-WAY SIGNALS 27/01/2020 31/01/2020
    [Show full text]
  • Flooding Survey June 1990 River Tame Catchment
    Flooding Survey June 1990 River Tame Catchment NRA National Rivers Authority Severn-Trent Region A RIVER CATCHMENT AREAS En v ir o n m e n t Ag e n c y NATIONAL LIBRARY & INFORMATION SERVICE HEAD OFFICE Rio House, Waterside Drive, Aztec West, Almondsbury. Bristol BS32 4UD W EISH NRA Cardiff Bristol Severn-Trent Region Boundary Catchment Boundaries Adjacent NRA Regions 1. Upper Severn 2. Lower Severn 3. Avon 4. Soar 5. Lower Trent 6. Derwent 7. Upper Trent 8. Tame - National Rivers Authority Severn-Trent Region* FLOODING SURVEY JUNE 1990 SECTION 136(1) WATER ACT 1989 (Supersedes Section 2 4 (5 ) W a te r A c t 1973 Land Drainage Survey dated January 1986) RIVER TAME CATCHMENT AND WEST MIDLANDS Environment Agency FLOOD DEFENCE DEPARTMENT Information Centre NATONAL RIVERS AUTHORrTY SEVERN-TRENT REGION Head Office SAPPHIRE EAST Class N o 550 STREETSBROOK ROAD SOLIHULL cession No W MIDLANDS B91 1QT ENVIRONMENT AGENCY 0 9 9 8 0 6 CONTENTS Contents List of Tables List of Associated Reports List of Appendices References G1ossary of Terms Preface CHAPTER 1 SUMMARY 1.1 Introducti on 1.2 Coding System 1.3 Priority Categories 1.4 Summary of Problem Evaluations 1.5 Summary by Priority Category 1.6 Identification of Problems and their Evaluation CHAPTER 2 THE SURVEY Z.l Introduction 2.2 Purposes of Survey 2.3 Extent of Survey 2.4 Procedure 2.5 Hydrological Criteria 2.6 Hydraulic Criteria 2.7 Land Potential Category 2.8 Improvement Costs 2.9 Benefit Assessment 2.10 Test Discount Rate 2.11 Benefit/Cost Ratios 2.12 Priority Category 2.13 Inflation Factors
    [Show full text]
  • Upton – Chilton Road, Station Road and A417 London Road: Proposed Traffic Management Measures, Speed Limit and Toucan Crossing
    Divisions affected: Hendreds & Harwell CABINET MEMBER FOR ENVIRONMENT – 25 MARCH 2021 UPTON – CHILTON ROAD, STATION ROAD AND A417 LONDON ROAD: PROPOSED TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT MEASURES, SPEED LIMIT AND TOUCAN CROSSING Report by Corporate Director, Environment and Place RECOMMENDATION 1. The Cabinet Member for the Environment is RECOMMENDED to approve the following as advertised: Chilton Road a) 30mph Speed Limit – from its current terminal point, to the junction with Hagbourne Hill, replacing in the whole existing 40mph speed limit as a result. b) Banned Turning movements from Hagbourne Hill into Chilton Road from both directions, supported by No entry signs at the junction for vehicles approaching from the west. c) Traffic Calming Chicane (to be wide enough to accommodate non- standard cycles & wheelchairs) to be located on Chilton Road approx. 5 metres from Hagbourne Hill. d) Gate feature (with 1.5-metre-wide cycle bypass) to be located approx. 240 metres west of London Road. e) Raised table approximately 6 metres long, sited approximately 80 metres west of London Road A417 London Road f) a Toucan Crossing (controlled crossing for use by pedestrians & pedal cycles) to be located on London Road approx. 12 metres South of Chilton Road Station Road g) Raised table approximately 14.5 metres long, sited at its junction with London Road CMDE8 Executive summary 2. This report presents responses received to the statutory consultation on the proposals outlined in paragraph 1. Chilton Road is a missing link in an otherwise traffic-free or low traffic cycle route from Didcot to Harwell Campus and is part of the National Cycle Network (NCN) Route 544.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Tewkesbury Borough 2015
    Understanding Tewkesbury Borough 2015 Produced by the Strategic Needs Analysis Team, Gloucestershire County Council Version: v1.0 1 Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................ 4 2. Executive summary .................................................................................................... 5 3. Tewkesbury Borough context ..................................................................................... 0 3.1 About this section ................................................................................................... 0 3.2 Demographics ......................................................................................................... 0 3.3 Deprivation ............................................................................................................. 8 3.4 Life expectancy ..................................................................................................... 15 3.5 Mortality ................................................................................................................ 16 3.6 Economy ............................................................................................................... 21 3.7 Protected characteristics ....................................................................................... 39 3.8 Key messages ...................................................................................................... 46 4. Getting the right start in life ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ROSS-ON-WYE 4 9 Greytree D a 4 O 5 2 R 1 2 H 2
    To Hereford Welsh Newton To Hereford A40 A ROSS-ON-WYE 4 9 Greytree d a 4 o 5 2 R 1 2 H 2 6 4 o 4 7 0 m y 6 A4 B r B A40 s u 4 3 R 1 Greytree o b A a d 4 A449 d e Network Review & Consultation A L B Wilton 4 To Ledbury 2 Wilton er 3 st louce B4 3 G Road 024 d 6 B ad a 21 4 Alton Ro 4 Purple Route 2 Ro B A40 2 Street n 1 Ashfield to ROSS-ON-WYE ad l o A This route runs every hour between Coleford, Lydney and Gloucester. Purple and A4 4 Tudorville M R 5 0 1 23 5 field Monmouth 4 0 hen 2 green routes provide a joint service from Gloucester to Westbury-on-Severn and rc 4 B A Merrivale B 29 Goodrich Coleford every 30 minutes. Purple and green routes connect without the need to 42 4 B 6 A change buses in Coleford, improving links between Lydney and Cinderford. 1 Dymock 4 4 B 0 Tudorville 4 2 Green Route 2 A 4 M50 4 B 6 6 3 This route runs every hour between Coleford, Cinderford and Gloucester. Purple 6 1 4 and green routes provide a joint service from Gloucester to Westbury-on-Severn and A Coleford every 30 minutes. Some daytime buses will run via English Bicknor rather 4 3 F 2 H than Worrall Hill. Purple and green routes connect without the need to change buses Gorsley o ig 4 r h Staunton e 5 S B s t 1 t r English Bicknor e in Coleford, improving links between Lydney and Cinderford.
    [Show full text]