DOCSLIB.ORG

7.2 COTSWOLD DISTRICT COUNCIL AREA Rationale for Proposed

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
7.2 COTSWOLD DISTRICT COUNCIL AREA Rationale for Proposed 7.2 COTSWOLD DISTRICT COUNCIL AREA Number of Proposed Divisions: 8 Total Electorate for District in 2010: 68,324 Forecast Electorate for District in 2016: 71,392 Forecast District Average Number of Electors per 8,924 Councillor in 2016: Forecast County Average Number of Electors per 9,220 Councillor in 2016: % Co-terminosity with District Wards 75% Rationale for Proposed Divisions The Cotswold district area is largely rural mainly comprising rural parishes, small market towns and the large historic town of Cirencester. The proposed divisions are formed around established market towns which have strong local community identity. By using existing district wards as the building bricks, it has been possible to achieve 75% coterminosity with district wards. The largest town of Cirencester requires two divisions. The existing division is currently represented by two councillors. The proposed two new divisions (divisions CO 4 and CO 5) are formed by using existing district wards to create an East and West split. The East division also includes some rural areas which are linked along the major A419 road. The centre of the Cotswold District area is the most sparsely populated area of Gloucestershire. A geographically large division CO 3 is necessary here. The largest settlement is Northleach. Two major routes traverse the area, the old Cirencester Road A435 and the A40 London Road. Both along and between these on the “top of the Cotswolds” are many small rural communities but no major settlements. Other divisions are largely dictated by the shape of the county. Starting in the southwest, a division has been created around the market town of Tetbury and the area to the east towards Cirencester. One district ward is split to give electoral equality between Tetbury and South Cerney divisions. The South Cerney division area is created to take in the area of development and existing villages around the Water Park development area. To the east of the A419 there is a distinct community around Lechlade and the River Thames with a rural area to the north. Geography again suggests a division based around the market town of Chipping Campden in the north of the district extending to the edge of Moreton-in-Marsh. A Moreton-in-Marsh division also includes the community of Stow-on-the-Wold. These communities are linked by the major A429 road. Member Support The proposals for the Cotswold District Council area are supported by councillors from all political groups. Electorate Figures for 2010 and Forecast Figures for 2016 Division 2010 2016 Forecast Forecast Electorate Electorate electoral electoral variance in variance in 2016 (based 2016 (based on District on County average) average) CO1 8,226 8,555 -4% -7% CO2 9,146 9,904 11% 7% CO3 9,128 9,442 6% 2% CO4 7,633 8,128 -9% -12% CO5 9,215 9,539 7% 3% CO6 8,354 8,750 -2% -5% CO7 8,504 8,667 -3% -6% CO8 8,118 8,405 -6% -9% Total Electorate 68,324 71,390 for Cotswold District Cotswold Division CO 1 The proposed new division is created around the North Cotswold’s market town of Chipping Campden and surrounding parishes. Polling Polling District District Ward 2010 2016 District Name Electorate Electorate AH Aston Subedge Campden Vale 46 46 CBA Chipping Campden Campden Vale 1,954 2,026 EB Ebrington Campden Vale 502 513 MC Mickleton Campden Vale 1,391 1,443 SA Saintbury Campden Vale 71 72 WB Weston-subedge Campden Vale 343 354 WE Willersey Campden Vale 698 729 SE Sezincote Fossbridge 77 81 BD Batsford Fossbridge 85 89 TF Todenham Fossbridge 210 223 BL Bourton-on-the-Hill Fossbridge 246 259 DC Donnington Fossbridge 54 57 LE Longborough Fossbridge 403 427 BQ Broadwell Fossbridge 310 327 CU Condicote Fossbridge 108 114 BI Blockley-Aston Blockley 435 451 Magna BJ Blockley-Blockley Blockley 1,005 1,041 BK Blockley-Paxford Blockley 288 303 Total 8,226 8,555 Cotswold Division CO 2 The proposed new division is created around the market towns of Moreton-in-the- Marsh and Stow-on-the-Wold. The two communities are linked together by the major A429 road. Polling Polling District District Ward 2010 2016 District Name Electorate Electorate GA Great Rissington Rissingtons 319 317 IA Icomb Rissingtons 85 85 LC Little Rissington Rissingtons 224 250 UA Upper Rissington Rissingtons 749 737 WA Westcote Rissingtons 183 180 WJ Wyck Rissington Rissingtons 100 98 MD Moreton-in-Marsh Moreton-in-Marsh 2,986 3,398 CX Cutsdean Three Rivers 56 55 CB Guiting Power Three Rivers 279 276 LF Lower Slaughter Three Rivers 212 224 NA Naunton Three Rivers 298 304 SN Swell Three Rivers 362 361 TA Temple Guiting Three Rivers 313 308 UB Upper Slaughter Three Rivers 155 152 AA Adlestrop Beacon-Stow 110 216 BH Bledington Beacon-Stow 410 435 EE Evenlode Beacon-Stow 142 151 MB Maurgersbury Beacon-Stow 121 127 OA Oddington Beacon-Stow 337 361 SM Stow-on-the-Wold 1 Beacon-Stow 1,705 1,869 Total 9,146 9,904 Cotswold Division CO 3 The proposed new division is created around the market town of Northleach and includes a number of rural parishes. Polling Polling District District Ward 2010 2016 District Name Electorate Electorate HA Hampnett Northleach 47 47 NC Northleach with Northleach 1,451 1,469 Eastington AF Andoversford Sandywell 541 594 HD Hazleton Sandywell 156 156 ND Notgrove Sandywell 77 77 SD Sevenhampton Sandywell 310 315 SG Shipton Sandywell 324 324 TG Turkdean Sandywell 62 62 WD Whittington Sandywell 87 88 CA Chedworth Chedworth 675 684 CT Compton Abdale Chedworth 102 105 DD Dowdeswell Chedworth 121 124 WI Withington Chedworth 438 439 YA Yanworth Chedworth 94 95 BA Bagendon Churn Valley 226 227 BE Baunton Churn Valley 251 254 CN Coberley Part 1 Churn Valley 151 155 CO Coberley Part 2 Churn Valley 168 171 CQ Colesbourne Churn Valley 123 135 NB North Cerney Churn Valley 482 482 RA Rendcomb Churn Valley 197 198 BM Bourton-on-the- Bourton-on- 2,702 2,900 Water the-Water CL Clapton Bourton-on- 104 104 the-Water CP Cold Aston Bourton-on- 239 237 the-Water Total 9,128 9,442 Cotswold Division CO 4 The proposed new division includes part of Cirencester and parishes to the North. The communities are linked by the major A417 road. Polling Polling District District Ward 2010 2016 District Name Electorate Electorate CI Cirencester Cirencester 2,068 2,213 Stratton – 1 Stratton- Whiteway CJ Cirencester Cirencester 831 1,020 Stratton – 2 Stratton- Whiteway CF Cirencester Cirencester- 3,185 3,288 Beeches Beeches BO Brimpsfield Ermin Ward 194 195 BP Brimpsfield Ermin Ward 46 46 Caudle Green CV Cowley Div 1 Ermin Ward 114 140 CW Cowley Div 2 Ermin Ward 189 215 DA Daglingworth Ermin Ward 247 246 DG Duntisbourne Ermin Ward 200 202 Abbots DH Duntisbourne Ermin Ward 63 64 Rouse EC Edgeworth Ermin Ward 72 75 ED Elkstone Ermin Ward 204 203 SO Syde Ermin Ward 20 19 WH Winstone Ermin Ward 200 202 TOTAL 7,633 8,128 Cotswold Division CO 5 The proposed new division splits the market town of Cirencester into two on an east- west split. Polling Polling District District Ward 2010 2016 District Name Electorate Electorate CG Cirencester Cirencester 2,972 3,084 Chesteron Chesterton CH Cirencester Park Cirencester 2,856 2,971 Park CK Cirencester Cirencester 3,387 3,484 Watermoor Watermoor Total 9,215 9,539 Cotswold Division CO 6 The proposed new division is created around the market town of Tetbury and reflects local community structures and geography. Polling Polling District District Ward 2010 2016 District Name Electorate Electorate AG Ashley Avening 114 113 AL Avening Avening 926 934 CB Cherington Avening 120 119 LD Long Newnton Avening 167 177 RB Rodmarton Avening 277 294 BF Beverston Grumbolds Ash 111 110 BN Boxwell with Grumbolds Ash 203 206 Leighterton DB Didmarton Grumbolds Ash 356 361 KC Kingscote Grumbolds Ash 234 246 OB Ozleworth Grumbolds Ash 36 35 SH Shipton Moyne Grumbolds Ash 239 249 TE Tetbury Upton Grumbolds Ash 255 267 WC Westonbirt with Grumbolds Ash 139 160 Lasborough TB Tetbury Part 1 Tetbury 1,660 1,762 TC Tetbury Part 2 Tetbury 1,599 1,687 TD Tetbury Part 3 Tetbury 1,144 1,248 CM Coates Thames Head 405 405 SB Sapperton Thames Head 155 163 SC Frampton Mansell Thames Head 214 214 Total 8,354 8,750 Cotswold Division CO 7 The proposed new division is created around the large parish of South Cerney and is created to take in the area of development and existing villages around the water park development area. To the east of the A419 is a distinct community around Lechlade and the River Thames with a rural area to the north. Polling Polling District District Ward 2010 2016 District Name Electorate Electorate PA Poole Keynes Water Park 168 172 PC Preston Water Park 291 291 SI Siddington Water Park 1,030 1,033 SJ Somerford Keynes Water Park 406 425 SK South Cerney Water Park 2,705 2,736 DE Down Ampney Hampton 499 516 DF Driffield Hampton 141 144 MA Maiseyhampton Hampton 506 519 PB Poulton Hampton 358 368 AC Ampney-Crucis Ampney-Coln 516 521 AD Ampney St Mary Ampney-Coln 96 96 AE Ampney St Peter Ampney-Coln 64 64 BB Barnsley Ampney-Coln 127 127 BG Bibury Ampney-Coln 518 528 CS Coln St Dennis Ampney-Coln 178 183 WG Winson Ampney-Coln 75 75 KA Kemble Thames 826 869 Head Total 8,504 8,667 Cotswold Division CO 8 The proposed new division is created around the communities of Fairford and Lechlade and the eastern part of the Cotswold Water Park development area.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Value for Money Integration in the Renegotiation of Public Private Partnership Road Projects by Ajibola Oladipo Fatokun
    Value for Money Integration in the Renegotiation of Public Private Partnership Road Projects By Ajibola Oladipo Fatokun A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment for the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Central Lancashire October 2018 i STUDENT DECLARATION I declare that while registered as a candidate for the research degree, I have not been a registered candidate or enrolled student for another award of the University or other academic or professional institution I declare that no material contained in the thesis has been used in any other submission for an academic award and is solely my own work Signature of Candidate: ____________________________________________________ Type of Award: ________________________ PhD _______________________ School: ______________________ Engineering ____________________ ii ABSTRACT The governments of various countries have continued to adopt Public Private Partnership (PPP) for infrastructure projects delivery due to its many advantages over the traditional procurement method. However, concerns have been raised by stakeholders about the viability of PPP to deliver Value for Money (VfM), especially for the client. These discussions have generated debates and arguments in policy and advisory documents within the last decade mainly in the renegotiation of PPP water and transport projects and their VfM implications. Poor or non-achievement of VfM in PPP contracts renegotiation has led to this study in PPP road projects with the overall aim of integrating VfM considerations into the renegotiation process of PPP road projects. Mixed methodology research approach is used to achieve the objectives set for the study. Interviews and questionnaires of professionals involved in Design-Build-Finance-Operate (DBFO) road projects in the UK are used in the study.
    [Show full text]
  • Additional Housing Options Consultation Report
    Stroud District Local Plan Review Additional Housing Options Consultation Report April 2021 Development Services Stroud District Council Ebley Mill Stroud Gloucestershire GL5 4UB The Planning Strategy Team 01453 754143 [email protected] visit www.stroud.gov.uk/localplanreview 1. Introduction 3 4 2. Public consultation 3. Overview of responses 8 4. What you told us 10 Spatial Options Question 1 10 Question 2 11 Question 3 12 Question 4 13 Question 5 14 Question 6 14 New housing sites Question 7 16 Question 8 21 Potential growth points Question 9 21 Question 10 24 Sustainability Appraisal Question 11 24 5. Appendices Appendix 1 Site maps for Question 8 *Maps will be completed for Regulation 19 Consultation STROUD DISTRICT LOCAL PLAN REVIEW | ADDITIONAL HOUSING OPTIONS CONSULTATION Page | 2 1. Introduction 1.1 In November 2019, the Council published and carried out consultation on the Stroud District Council Local Plan Review: Draft Plan for Consultation. The Draft Plan sets out the preferred development strategy for meeting the District’s growth needs for the period to 2040 based on a minimum housing requirement of 638 homes per annum calculated under the Government Standard Method. A separate report analysing responses to the Draft Plan consultation is available to view on the Council’s website at www.stroud.gov.uk/Stroud District Local Plan review. 1.2 In August 2020, the Government published a consultation document proposing changes to the method for calculating the minimum housing requirement for each local authority area in the country. This revised standard method proposed increasing the requirement for Stroud District from 638 homes per annum to 786 homes per annum and a need to plan for a potential additional 1,050 – 2,400 homes between now and 2040.
    [Show full text]
  • Gi200900.Pdf
    Gloucestershire Society for Industrial Archaeology Journal for 2009 Contents Editorial......................................................................................................................................2 From Willow to Wicket: A Lost Cricket Bat Willow Plantation in Leonard Stanley. By Stephen Mills ......................................................................... 3-8 Matthews & Company – Gloucester’s Premier Furniture Manufacturers By Hugh Conway-Jones ......................................................................................... 9-13 Two Recently Discovered Field Books from Sopwith’s Mineral Survey of the Forest of Dean. By Ian Standing ......................................................................... 14-22 The Canal Round House at Inglesham Lock By John Copping (Adapted for the GSIA Journal by Alan Strickland) ..................................................................... 23-35 Upper Redbrook Iron Works 1798-9: David Tanner's Bankruptcy By Pat Morris ...... 36-40 The Malthouse, Tanhouse Farm, Church End, Frampton on Severn, Gloucestershire By Amber Patrick ................................................................................................. 41-46 The Restoration of the Cotswold Canals, July 2010 Update. By Theo Stening .............. 47-50 GSIA Visit Reports for 2009 ............................................................................................. 51-57 Book Reviews ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 5304 Study of Land Surrounding Key
    Study of land surrounding Key Settlements in Cotswold District: Update Additional Sites 2015: Final Report to Cotswold District Council November 2015 Tel: 029 2043 7841 Email: [email protected] Web: www.whiteconsultants.co.uk Cotswold District Council Study of land surrounding Key Settlements in Cotswold District Update CONTENTS page PART 1 1 Introduction 3 2 Summary of findings 4 Tables Table 1 Additional sites landscape sensitivity: Housing/small scale mixed development PART 2 3 Site sensitivities Sites are considered in turn in settlement order with associated figures Andoversford 7 Down Ampney 10 Fairford 13 Lechlade 15 Mickleton 18 Moreton-in-Marsh 20 Northleach 22 Siddington 24 South Cerney 27 Stow-on-the-Wold 31 Tetbury 33 Willersey 36 Cover photo- Field adjacent to a development site north of Cirencester Road, Tetbury White Consultants 1 Additional sites 2015 final/021115 Cotswold District Council Study of land surrounding Key Settlements in Cotswold District Update PART 1 White Consultants 2 Additional sites 2015 final/021115 Cotswold District Council Study of land surrounding Key Settlements in Cotswold District Update 1. Introduction 1.1. White Consultants were appointed by Cotswold District Council in April 2014 to undertake an update of the landscape assessment around key settlements1 undertaken in 2000. 1.2. The scope of the study was to update the assessment taking into account the impact of any physical change since 2000, any revised assessments, policies and up-to-date guidance and focussing on the strategic housing land availability assessment (SHLAA) sites coming forward. The sites considered in this report are new sites that have been put forward for inclusion into the update of the SHLAA that is currently being carried out by Cotswold District Council.
    [Show full text]
  • (Public Pack)Agenda Document for Cabinet, 08/06/2016 10:00
    CABINET 10.00 am on Wednesday 8 June 2016 MEETING PAPERS ATTACHED Cabinet Wednesday 8 June 2016 at 10.00 am Cabinet Suite - Shire Hall, Gloucester AGENDA Item Discussion Portfolio 1 Apologies Leader of Council To note any apologies for absence. 2 Minutes (Pages 1 - 18) Leader of Council To confirm the minutes of the meeting held on 20 April 2016, (minutes attached). 3 Declarations of Interest Leader of Council Cabinet members are invited to declare any pecuniary or personal interests relating to specific matters on the agenda. Please see note (a) at the end of the agenda 4 Questions at Cabinet Meetings Leader of Council To answer any written and/or oral questions from a County Councillor, (or anyone living or working in the county, or anyone who is affected by the work of the County Council), about matters which relate to any item on the agenda for this meeting. Up to 30 minutes is allowed for this item. The closing date for the receipt of written questions is 4.00 pm on Thursday 2 June 2016. Please send questions to the Chief Executive marked for the attention of Jo Moore (email: [email protected]) 8 June 2016 An oral question may be asked by a member of the public if notice of the question is given by the questioner to the person presiding at the meeting, or the Chief Executive’s representative, at least 30 minutes prior to the start of the meeting. Depending on the nature of the questions, it may not be possible to provide a comprehensive answer at the meeting, in which case a written answer will be provided as soon as reasonably possible after the meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Preston Neighbourhood Development Plan 2018-2031
    Evidence Paper Design in Preston A Parish Design Statement prepared by the Residents of the Parish of Preston Nr. Cirencester PRESTON NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2019-2031 REGULATION 14 CONSULTATION DRAFTPage | 0 Prepared by Preston Parish Council and Andrea Pellegram MRTPI Design in Preston Introduction 1. Successful Parish/Village Design demands a harmony between traditional and new buildings. This enhances both the appearance of the environment and community life. Future design should, therefore, consider patterns and details which give Preston its special character. 2. This statement is intended to encourage good design by analyzing the characteristic style of Preston and suggesting ways in which it might be applied to all future landscape and building activity in the Parish. 3. This Statement provides guidance to all interested parties; including Cotswold District Council, the Parish Council when considering any planning applications (e.g. developers of new housing in the Parish) and homeowners contemplating work to their property. 4. Appendix 2 of this document discusses the planning policy context relevant to design in Preston. How the Statement was prepared 5. Further to a decision by the Parish Council a Steering Group was set up to prepare the Design Statement. This Steering Group met on a regular basis during 2015/2016 to discuss the content of the Statement and the most suitable way forward. This resulted in the distribution of a questionnaire in October 2015 to all the residents of the Parish. The number of questionnaires returned represented 43% of the properties. Approximately 50% of the Village responded. Analysis of the responses to the questionnaire has enabled the Steering Group to prepare this document which, following completion was presented to the Parish Council for approval.
    [Show full text]
  • Ricardo Road, Minchinhampton, Stroud, Gloucestershire, GL6 9BY Price £425,000 Ricardo Road, Minchinhampton, Stroud, Gloucestershire, GL6 9BY
    Ricardo Road, Minchinhampton, Stroud, Gloucestershire, GL6 9BY Price £425,000 Ricardo Road, Minchinhampton, Stroud, Gloucestershire, GL6 9BY A well presented and deceptively spacious three double bedroom detached bungalow situated within this popular village setting. Outside the generous front and rear gardens are mainly laid to lawn with well stocked flower and shrub borders. The driveway provides ample parking and access to garage. NO CHAIN The accommodation in brief comprises: Entrance porch, KITCHEN/BREAKFAST ROOM 3.98m (13'1") x 3.02m (9'11") SELLING AGENT hallway, living/dining room, kitchen/breakfast room, three Double glazed door to side, double glazed window to rear and Sawyers Estate Agents bedrooms and shower room. The property offers further side, range of fitted wall and base units complemented with 17 George Street potential giving purchasers the opportunity to put their contrasting work surfaces, stainless steel one and a quarter Stroud own stamp on it. Benefits include double glazing where bowl sink unit with mixer taps, tiled splash backs, breakfast bar, Gloucestershire specified and gas central heating. space for cooker, plumbing for dishwasher, space for GL5 3DP fridge/freezer. Airing cupboard. Wall mounted boiler. Outside the generous front and rear level gardens are 01453 751647 mainly laid to lawn with well stocked mature shrub and tree BEDROOM ONE 4.22m (13'10") x 2.97m (9'9") [email protected] borders. The driveway provides ample parking along with Double glazed window to front, two double glazed windows to www.sawyersestateagents.co.uk access to the garage. No onward chain. side. Radiator. Local Authority BEDROOM TWO 3.48m (11'5") x 2.97m (9'9") Stroud District Council - Band E Double glazed window to rear, built in double wardrobe.
    [Show full text]
  • Faringdon, Wantage & Wallingford
    CONTENTS 5.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 2 5.2 History of the Route ......................................................................................................... 2 5.2.1 Stanford Road ................................................................................................... 2 5.2.2 Icknield Way/Portway ....................................................................................... 3 5.2.3 Wallingford Road .............................................................................................. 4 5.2.4 Early use of the Road ........................................................................................ 5 5.3 The First Act .................................................................................................................... 6 5.4 Implementing the Act ...................................................................................................... 7 5.5 Later Acts ......................................................................................................................... 7 5.6 Wallingford Toll-Bridge .................................................................................................. 9 5.7 The Trustees ..................................................................................................................... 10 5.8 Trust Officers and Finance............................................................................................... 11
    [Show full text]
  • The Palladian Way – 2016
    THE PALLADIAN WAY – 2016 The Palladian Way owes the title of ‘architectural trail’ to a style of building design developed by Andre Palladio in 16th Century Italy. This borrowed heavily from classical Roman precedents and was in turn copied and developed by such luminaries as Inigo Jones, Christopher Wren, John Vanburgh and William Kent, each adding their own refinements. At the heart of Palladio’s design for private villas was symmetry. Key features were wide front steps leading up to a large central area behind classical pillars supporting a pediment with a low triangular gable above. Broad house walls gave widespread views from all sides over formal gardens. Overall the size would reflect a cube shape or one governed by a mathematical formula where the width and height could be divided exactly by 6. To this could be added circular staircases, imposing estate rooms and a dome or cupola such as that later to top Wren’s St Paul’s. So a key feature of the walk was to see how far this Palladian style still graced the large buildings on the route, just as those buildings largely dictated the key destinations on the way. Stage 1 – Buckingham to Woodstock - Wednesday – Friday 23 – 25 February 2016 Penny, Hazel, Chas, David It’s late February; picture blue skies, a light breeze and almost wall to wall sunshine. You’d be imagining somewhere far away from England. Throw in deep overnight frost with several degrees minus and you might start to wonder. But Bucks, Northants and Oxon would probably still not spring to mind.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a Benchmarking Document
    Stroud Sustainable Transport Strategy DRAFT Project number: 60598598 Appendix A Benchmarking Document Prepared for: Stroud District Council AECOM 34 Stroud Sustainable Transport Strategy Benchmarking Report Stroud District Council Project number: 60598598 15 November 2019 DRAFT Stroud Sustainable Transport Strategy DRAFT Project number: 60598598 Quality information Prepared by Checked by Verified by Approved by Revision History Revision Revision date Details Authorised Name Position 01 15/11/19 Final Distribution List # Hard Copies PDF Required Association / Company Name 0 Y SDC, as an appendix to the Sustainable Transport Strategy Prepared for: Stroud District Council Stroud Benchmarking Report_final.docx AECOM Stroud Sustainable Transport Strategy DRAFT Project number: 60598598 Prepared for: Stroud District Council Prepared by: AECOM UK Limited 3rd Floor, Portwall Place Portwall Lane Bristol BS1 6NA United Kingdom © 2019 AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited (“AECOM”) for sole use of our client (the “Client”) in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. No third party may rely upon this document without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM. Prepared for: Stroud
    [Show full text]
  • Oaksey Neighbourhood Plan – Referendum Version (Final Plan) Oaksey Neighbourhood Plan 2018-2026
    Council Oaksey Oaksey Parish Neighbourhood Plan 2018-2026 Referendum Version January 2019 Oaksey Neighbourhood Plan – Referendum Version (Final Plan) Oaksey Neighbourhood Plan 2018-2026 Referendum Version – January 2019 The Oaksey Neighbourhood Plan produced in accordance with the Neighbourhood Planning Regulations 2012 The Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group on behalf of Oaksey Parish Council: Councillor Professor Richard Moody (Chair) Tony Fleming Colonel Nick Mangnall Mike Martin Nigel Nicholls Miriam Nicholls Fred Price Councillor David Spurrier-Kimbell Councillor Roger Squance The Parish Council received professional planning support from NEIGHBOURHOOD-PLAN.CO.UK during the production of this Neighbourhood Plan. NEIGHBOURHOOD-PLAN.CO.UK For any query relating to the Neighbourhood Plan contact: Veronica Hourihane – Clerk to the Council Tel - 01285 706303 Email: [email protected] www.oakseyvillage.org 2 Oaksey Neighbourhood Plan – Referendum Version (Final Plan) Oaksey Neighbourhood Plan 2018-2026 Documents Forming the Neighbourhood Plan The Neighbourhood Plan (This Document) Supporting Documents Basic Consultation SEA Screening Conditions Statement Statement Evidence Base Housing Site Designated HRA Screening Links Selection Area Plan Document Methodology Settlement Boundary Methodology 3 Oaksey Neighbourhood Plan – Referendum Version (Final Plan) This page is intentionally blank 4 Oaksey Neighbourhood Plan – Referendum Version (Final Plan) Contents Foreword Page 7 Acknowledgements Page 8 Section 1 – The Neighbourhood Plan Page
    [Show full text]
  • APPLICATION NO: 07/0081/GLMAJW VALIDATION 20Th November DATE: 2007 DISTRICT REF: AGENT: P E Duncliffe Ltd, Stonecroft, Park Road, Nailsworth, GL6 0HW
    APPLICATION NO: 07/0081/GLMAJW VALIDATION 20th November DATE: 2007 DISTRICT REF: AGENT: P E Duncliffe Ltd, Stonecroft, Park Road, Nailsworth, GL6 0HW APPLICANT: Allstone Sand and Gravels, Myers Road, Gloucester, GL1 3QD SITE: Allstone House, Myers Road, Gloucester, GL1 3QD PROPOSAL: Variation of Condition 7 of Planning Permission 05/01126/FUL to allow the door on the east elevation to be used in association with the waste transfer station. PARISH OF N/A SITE AREA: 0.75 Ha GRID REF: 384687 218258 That planning permission be granted for the RECOMMENDED: reasons set out in this report and summarised at paragraphs 7.8–7.13, and subject to the conditions set out in section 8 of this report. 1.0 LOCATION 1.1 Allstone House is a portal steel frame warehouse building, 120m long and 30m wide, set on a 0.75 ha site within the built up area of Gloucester. The building accommodates a waste transfer station handling household, commercial and industrial wastes including putrescible and hazardous wastes. 1.2 The application site lies a short distance to the east of the city centre on former railway land immediately north of the main Gloucester to Birmingham railway. Access to the site is derived from a short private road that joins Myers Road to the west which in turn links with the A3042 Metz Way via Horton Road. Vehicles enter through a gateway in the north western corner of the fenced site and waste lorries track right to enter the building on the southern elevation. After depositing their load they leave via the same entrance and continue around the building in an anti-clockwise direction to leave via the gateway.
    [Show full text]