DOCSLIB.ORG

LOCAL TRANSPORT PLAN REVIEW December 2014 FEEDBACK FROM

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

LOCAL TRANSPORT PLAN REVIEW December 2014 FEEDBACK FROM STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOPS AUTUMN 2014 Version 1.0 Last Revised December 2014 Review Date Ongoing Category Strategic Infrastructure Owner Ben Watts Anyone wishing to obtain information on Gloucestershire County Target Audience Council’s Local Transport Plan consultation process GLOUCESTERSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL Local Transport Plan Review December 2014 Feedback from stakeholder workshops Contents Amendment Record This report has been issued and amended as follows: Issue Revision Description Date Signed 1.0 Agreed document 08/01/15 BW Contents 1.0 Introduction 1 2.0 Workshops 1 3.1 Tewkesbury 3rd October 2014 3 3.2 Moreton-in-Marsh 7th October 2014 4 3.3 Cirencester 8th October 2014 5 3.4 Brockworth 9th October 2014 6 3.5 Nailsworth 22nd October 2014 8 3.6 Mitcheldean 24th October 2014 9 3.7 Cheltenham 28th October 2014 11 3.8 Stow-on-the-Wold 11th November 2014 13 1.0 Introduction In response to feedback received by Stakeholders at the Information Sharing event in July 2014 a revised consultation strategy was developed for the Local Transport Plan (LTP) Review which included a series of stakeholder workshops held during the autumn 2014. This document sets out the headlines from those workshops alongside the secondary documents which form part of the wider evidence base to inform the development of the Connecting Places Strategies (CPS). A public consultation on the Local Transport Plan Review including details of the Connecting Places Strategies is planned for spring 2015. Please note that the information provided within this summary document does not provide a definitive record of everything which was discussed at the consultation events and are not representative of the views of Gloucestershire County Council, Atkins or Harris Ethical. It is simply a collation of the frequent ideas/suggestions/issues which stakeholders at the workshops shared with the facilitation team. 2.0 Workshops During October and November eight consultation workshops were held at locations throughout the County. 160 stakeholders attended representing 105 different organisations. The majority of these who attended were either County or District Councillors or representatives of Parish and Town Councils. Figures 1 and 2 illustrate the attendance at each workshop in addition to the type of organisation they represented. For more information on the process used to inform the CPS’s please refer to the Connecting Places Strategy Methodology Statement available on the County Council’s website. Figure 1 – Stakeholder attendance at workshops Stakeholder Attendance at LTP Workshops October / November 2014 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 1 Figure 2 – Stakeholder representation at workshops Stakeholder Representation at LTP Workshops October / November 2014 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Each workshop began with a brief explanation regarding the shift in emphasis within the LTP from transport being considered only in terms of its operation to transports role as an enabler to improve the quality of place and enhance Gloucestershire’s potential for its residents and local businesses. Each session was highly interactive with stakeholders given the opportunity to discuss their existing ‘issues’ with transport before being invited to share their ‘ideas’. This was considered in the context of the local Connecting Places Strategy (CPS) areas (see Appendix A), before countywide and out of county travel were considered. 803 issues were raised and 712 ideas were generated and feedback on the workshops has been very positive. Section 3 of this report outlines the feedback from each workshop along alongside the related secondary documents. 2 3.1 Tewkesbury 3rd October 2014 Workshop Key headlines form the Workshops Key headlines from secondary documents Summary- comparing the existing documents against the workshop feedback Tewkesbury Validated themes Improved access to shops within Tewkesbury town centre through the SEP 1. Congestion along the A46, at Junction 9 on the M5 and along the A38 improvement of parking capacity/park and ride facility located off Junction Congestion at A46 and junction with M5 2. Cycle routes limited between Tewkesbury and Cheltenham 9. 3. Gap in rail services and potential upgrade to Ashchurch station to Use of technology to manage congestion on key trunk roads around LTP Evidence Base accommodate growth aspirations. Tewkesbury; in particular the A46 between Junction 9 and Aston Cross and Cycle routes limited between Tewkesbury and Cheltenham 4. Limited public transport access to and from rural areas within the the A38 between Gloucester and Tewkesbury Congestion hotspots at A38/A4019 junction and A438 (M5 to Shannon Tewkesbury Corridor. E.g. Winchcombe and Bishops Cleeve. Reduce congestion around the M5 Junction 9 Way) 5. Improve the public transport network beyond Tewkesbury, Gloucester Sustainable and ecological schemes Gap in rail services and potential upgrade to Ashchurch station to and Cheltenham. Improved cycling and walking routes from peripheral settlements (such as accommodate growth aspirations including increase in car parking spaces Ashchurch and Twyning) into Tewkesbury town centre and places of work, Health quality indicators where area is worse than England average through the conversion of disused railway lines and/or working alongside Pockets of income and overall deprivation land owners to upgrade existing public rights of way into a mixed cycle/ JCS strategic allocation at former MoD site and land south of Alexandra pedestrian route. Way New developments to provide sustainable travel options for new and New Themes Business case to upgrade M5 J9 to support future growth existing residents. 1. Cycle routes beyond the main urban areas are poor- connecting villages Improve Ashchurch for Tewkesbury station – frequency, facilities and Junctions on M5 identified for development in LEP growth strategy and rural areas to main shops and services. access to and from the station. Winchcombe has limited public transport access to vocational education 2. Make better use of technology to manage congestion Improve the bus services to rural towns and villages- Winchcombe, providers 3. Rural roads used as ‘rat runs’ as a way of avoiding congestion leading to Bishops Cleeve, Woodmancote. road safety issues. Tewkesbury Borough Plan Completion of the Tewkesbury ring road 4. New developments to provide a sustainable transport network Concern about capacity of existing infrastructure to deal with further connecting new developments to retail, services and employment. Flood protection and quality infrastructure on new developments development 5. Park and Ride off of the M5 – addressing parking capacity in town and Improving the road infrastructure and reducing congestion to eliminate promotes sustainable tourism. the problem of ‘rat runs’ through smaller villages in the corridor. Seeks to support a transport system that is balanced in favour of sustainable modes Neighbouring Councils Feedback on the LTP Winchcombe with Sudeley Draft SEA scoping document Warwickshire Want improved public transport for leisure and tourism Good access to public transport, cycling and walking facilities Warwickshire CC has identified a significant growth hub along the A46 around Warwick and Coventry (between M40 and M69). The section of the A46 within Worcestershire and Gloucestershire is part single carriage and viewed providing issues (particularly in Ashchurch) for longer distance traffic= Warwickshire CC has no plans to review their LTP at this stage. Neighbouring Councils Feedback on the LTP Worcestershire Worcestershire CC is supporting the approach of working with satellite navigation companies to illustrate preferred freight routes. Worcestershire CC approach to encourage model shift the ‘Choose how you move’ campaign in Redditch is a success. They confirmed the switch to electronic materials moving forward and highlighted the importance of creating apps for live travel reports and information on alternative routes. Worcestershire CC does plan to provide an update as their District based Local Plans have now advanced to a stage where a detailed implementation pan can be produced. 3 3.2 Moreton-in-Marsh 7th October 2014 Workshop Key headlines form the Workshops Key headlines from secondary documents Summary- comparing the existing documents against the workshop feedback Moreton-in- Validated Themes Marsh Improve access to key health services in Cheltenham and Gloucester CPS Profiles 1. Poor access to rail stations. through the implementation of improved bus services/community Concerns with freight on A44/A429 2. Road safety issues for motorists and cyclists along A429. transport schemes to tie into early appointment times. Pinchpoint in Moreton at railway bridge 3. Freight management on the A44/A429/A40 Improve access to the public transport network in rural settlements within A429 (Fosse Way) is a road safety concern with speeding traffic 4. Parking capacity in the Market towns- Bourton, Stow and Morton. 5. Poor journey times to access academic and vocational learning the North Cotswold Corridor. Improved rail links to Kingham station and long term aim of reopening opportunities. Provide integrated transport information- e.g. community bus services, Chipping Campden station (subject to rail strategy review) stagecoach, carshare, real time bus information- to improve confidence the public transport network. In essence making sense of all public Evidence Base Review transport that is available to the North Cotswold corridor through
Recommended publications
  • Value for Money Integration in the Renegotiation of Public Private Partnership Road Projects by Ajibola Oladipo Fatokun

    Value for Money Integration in the Renegotiation of Public Private Partnership Road Projects by Ajibola Oladipo Fatokun

    Value for Money Integration in the Renegotiation of Public Private Partnership Road Projects By Ajibola Oladipo Fatokun A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment for the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Central Lancashire October 2018 i STUDENT DECLARATION I declare that while registered as a candidate for the research degree, I have not been a registered candidate or enrolled student for another award of the University or other academic or professional institution I declare that no material contained in the thesis has been used in any other submission for an academic award and is solely my own work Signature of Candidate: ____________________________________________________ Type of Award: ________________________ PhD _______________________ School: ______________________ Engineering ____________________ ii ABSTRACT The governments of various countries have continued to adopt Public Private Partnership (PPP) for infrastructure projects delivery due to its many advantages over the traditional procurement method. However, concerns have been raised by stakeholders about the viability of PPP to deliver Value for Money (VfM), especially for the client. These discussions have generated debates and arguments in policy and advisory documents within the last decade mainly in the renegotiation of PPP water and transport projects and their VfM implications. Poor or non-achievement of VfM in PPP contracts renegotiation has led to this study in PPP road projects with the overall aim of integrating VfM considerations into the renegotiation process of PPP road projects. Mixed methodology research approach is used to achieve the objectives set for the study. Interviews and questionnaires of professionals involved in Design-Build-Finance-Operate (DBFO) road projects in the UK are used in the study.
  • Consultation Document

    Consultation Document

    Consultation Gloucestershire’s Local Transport Plan Document 2015-31 A reliable transport network providing door to door travel choices Gloucestershire Local Transport Plan 2015-2031 i Gloucestershire’s Local Transport Plan (2015 – 2031) Consultation Document Approved by Gloucestershire County Council Cabinet Date Approved 4th February 2015 Version 1.0 Last Revised February 2015 Review Date April 2015 Category Strategic Planning Owner Transport Planning Team Anyone wishing to comment on the County Council’s Local Transport Plan Target Audience Consultation Gloucestershire Local Transport Plan 2015-2031 CONSULTATION QUESTIONNAIRE ii Consultation Document Having your say Thank you for taking the time to respond to the first formal review of This phase of consultation will last for six weeks from 16th February until the 27th Gloucestershire’s third Local Transport Plan (LTP). The LTP sets the long term March 2015.You can register your views. strategy for transport delivery within Gloucestershire from 2015 to 2031. Within this consultation document a significant number of changes have been made from the Using the County Council’s consultation portal - existing LTP which was adopted in 2011. www.gloucestershire.gov.uk/consultations Downloading the documents from the County Council’s website - This consultation process seeks to understand the level of support for the http://www.gloucestershire.gov.uk/ltp3 and emailing your response to proposed changes relating to: [email protected] Accessing a paper copy from Gloucestershire Libraries or Council The proposed Link and Place Hierarchy for 2031; buildings and sending a completed questionnaire to The proposed update to the LTP’s policies; The proposed prioritisation of transport initiatives in the context of the new Strategic Planning Connecting Places Strategies (CPS); and Block 5, 1st floor, Shire Hall The removal of historic transport schemes from the highways register.
  • 5304 Study of Land Surrounding Key

    5304 Study of Land Surrounding Key

    Study of land surrounding Key Settlements in Cotswold District: Update Additional Sites 2015: Final Report to Cotswold District Council November 2015 Tel: 029 2043 7841 Email: [email protected] Web: www.whiteconsultants.co.uk Cotswold District Council Study of land surrounding Key Settlements in Cotswold District Update CONTENTS page PART 1 1 Introduction 3 2 Summary of findings 4 Tables Table 1 Additional sites landscape sensitivity: Housing/small scale mixed development PART 2 3 Site sensitivities Sites are considered in turn in settlement order with associated figures Andoversford 7 Down Ampney 10 Fairford 13 Lechlade 15 Mickleton 18 Moreton-in-Marsh 20 Northleach 22 Siddington 24 South Cerney 27 Stow-on-the-Wold 31 Tetbury 33 Willersey 36 Cover photo- Field adjacent to a development site north of Cirencester Road, Tetbury White Consultants 1 Additional sites 2015 final/021115 Cotswold District Council Study of land surrounding Key Settlements in Cotswold District Update PART 1 White Consultants 2 Additional sites 2015 final/021115 Cotswold District Council Study of land surrounding Key Settlements in Cotswold District Update 1. Introduction 1.1. White Consultants were appointed by Cotswold District Council in April 2014 to undertake an update of the landscape assessment around key settlements1 undertaken in 2000. 1.2. The scope of the study was to update the assessment taking into account the impact of any physical change since 2000, any revised assessments, policies and up-to-date guidance and focussing on the strategic housing land availability assessment (SHLAA) sites coming forward. The sites considered in this report are new sites that have been put forward for inclusion into the update of the SHLAA that is currently being carried out by Cotswold District Council.
  • Draft Local Transport Plan Consultation Document 1

    Draft Local Transport Plan Consultation Document 1

    Gloucestershire’s Draft Draft Local Transport Plan Local Transport Plan Consultation | DOCUMENT 1 2015-31 Including the following strategy documents: A resilient transport network that enables sustainable economic growth • Overarching Strategy • CPS4 – South Cotswold Connecting Places Strategy providing door to door travel choices • CPS1 - Central Severn Vale Connecting Places Strategy • CPS5 – Stroud Connecting Places Strategy • CPS2 - Forest of Dean Connecting Places Strategy • CPS6 – Tewkesbury Connecting Places Strategy • CPS3 – North Cotswold Connecting Places Strategy This page is intentionally blank Draft Local Transport Plan consultation document 1 This document combines the following separate strategies into one document to aid the consultation process. Overarching Strategy CPS1 - Central Severn Vale Connecting Places Strategy CPS2 - Forest of Dean Connecting Places Strategy CPS3 – North Cotswold Connecting Places Strategy CPS4 – South Cotswold Connecting Places Strategy CPS5 – Stroud Connecting Places Strategy CPS6 – Tewkesbury Connecting Places Strategy This page is intentionally blank Gloucestershire’s Draft Local Transport Plan Overarching 2015-31 Strategy A resilient transport network that enables sustainable economic growth providing door to door travel choices Gloucestershire’s Draft Local Transport Plan - Overarching Strategy Local Transport Plan This strategy acts as guidance for anybody requiring information on how the county council will manage the transport network in Gloucestershire Overarching Strategy Document
  • Severn Estuary RCZAS Updated Project Design for Phase 2 Main

    Severn Estuary RCZAS Updated Project Design for Phase 2 Main

    Severn Estuary Rapid Coastal Zone Assessment Survey Updated Project Design for Phase 2 Main Fieldwork for English Heritage (HEEP Project No. 3885) Toby Catchpole and Adrian M. Chadwick Version 2 Revised, March 2010 Contents List of figures ............................................................................................................ iii Project details ............................................................................................................ v Summary ................................................................................................................. vii 1 Introduction and project background..................................................................1 2 Research aims and objectives ...........................................................................3 3 Summary of Phases 1 and 2a ...........................................................................5 3.1 Introduction .........................................................................................5 3.2 Sites identified as requiring further study in Phase 2a ......................... 5 3.3 The results of the Phase 2a fieldwork ................................................. 6 4 Project interfaces ...............................................................................................9 5 Communications and project products ............................................................. 11 6 Project review ..................................................................................................13 7 Health
  • Faringdon, Wantage & Wallingford

    Faringdon, Wantage & Wallingford

    CONTENTS 5.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 2 5.2 History of the Route ......................................................................................................... 2 5.2.1 Stanford Road ................................................................................................... 2 5.2.2 Icknield Way/Portway ....................................................................................... 3 5.2.3 Wallingford Road .............................................................................................. 4 5.2.4 Early use of the Road ........................................................................................ 5 5.3 The First Act .................................................................................................................... 6 5.4 Implementing the Act ...................................................................................................... 7 5.5 Later Acts ......................................................................................................................... 7 5.6 Wallingford Toll-Bridge .................................................................................................. 9 5.7 The Trustees ..................................................................................................................... 10 5.8 Trust Officers and Finance............................................................................................... 11
  • Appendix a Benchmarking Document

    Appendix a Benchmarking Document

    Stroud Sustainable Transport Strategy DRAFT Project number: 60598598 Appendix A Benchmarking Document Prepared for: Stroud District Council AECOM 34 Stroud Sustainable Transport Strategy Benchmarking Report Stroud District Council Project number: 60598598 15 November 2019 DRAFT Stroud Sustainable Transport Strategy DRAFT Project number: 60598598 Quality information Prepared by Checked by Verified by Approved by Revision History Revision Revision date Details Authorised Name Position 01 15/11/19 Final Distribution List # Hard Copies PDF Required Association / Company Name 0 Y SDC, as an appendix to the Sustainable Transport Strategy Prepared for: Stroud District Council Stroud Benchmarking Report_final.docx AECOM Stroud Sustainable Transport Strategy DRAFT Project number: 60598598 Prepared for: Stroud District Council Prepared by: AECOM UK Limited 3rd Floor, Portwall Place Portwall Lane Bristol BS1 6NA United Kingdom © 2019 AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited (“AECOM”) for sole use of our client (the “Client”) in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. No third party may rely upon this document without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM. Prepared for: Stroud
  • BFC Vol 08.7 Construction Traffic Management Plan

    BFC Vol 08.7 Construction Traffic Management Plan

    CTMP 8.7 CTMP Brechfa Forest Connection Development Consent Order Application - Reference EN020016 Construction Traffic Managment Plan May 2015 The Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 Regulation 5(2)(q) Construction Traffic Management Plan Document Details New Front Cover Required Document prepared by AMEC Foster Wheeler Cannon Court, Abbey Lawn, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY2 5DE 2 Construction Traffic Management Plan Contents 1 Introduction 7 1.1 Overview 7 1.2 Proposed development 8 1.3 Routing strategy 9 1.4 Mitigation measures 18 2 Site access and traffic management 20 2.1 Introduction 20 2.2 Overhead line section – south (accesses 1 to 46) 20 2.3 Underground cable section – (Accesses 91, 48-51) 23 2.4 Overhead line section – North (accesses 52 to 90) 24 2.5 Main contractors compound – (access 92) 26 2.6 Access types 26 2.7 Management of accesses 28 2.8 Local highway issues and constraints 29 2.9 Vehicle classification 33 2.10 Accesses 36 2.11 Construction vehicle routing to access locations 36 2.12 PRoW management plan 37 2.13 Scaffolding 37 2.14 Temporary traffic signage 39 2.15 Working hours 39 2.16 Timing of movements 40 3 Construction Traffic Management Plan 2.17 Banksman 40 2.18 Sustainable travel plans 40 2.19 Wheel/street cleaning 41 2.20 Highway condition surveys 41 3 Construction traffic routeing strategy 42 3.1 Introduction 42 3.2 Access to the Carmarthenshire area 43 3.3 Key strategic and local road links within the Carmarthenshire area 43 3.4 Route from main contractors
  • APPLICATION NO: 07/0081/GLMAJW VALIDATION 20Th November DATE: 2007 DISTRICT REF: AGENT: P E Duncliffe Ltd, Stonecroft, Park Road, Nailsworth, GL6 0HW

    APPLICATION NO: 07/0081/GLMAJW VALIDATION 20Th November DATE: 2007 DISTRICT REF: AGENT: P E Duncliffe Ltd, Stonecroft, Park Road, Nailsworth, GL6 0HW

    APPLICATION NO: 07/0081/GLMAJW VALIDATION 20th November DATE: 2007 DISTRICT REF: AGENT: P E Duncliffe Ltd, Stonecroft, Park Road, Nailsworth, GL6 0HW APPLICANT: Allstone Sand and Gravels, Myers Road, Gloucester, GL1 3QD SITE: Allstone House, Myers Road, Gloucester, GL1 3QD PROPOSAL: Variation of Condition 7 of Planning Permission 05/01126/FUL to allow the door on the east elevation to be used in association with the waste transfer station. PARISH OF N/A SITE AREA: 0.75 Ha GRID REF: 384687 218258 That planning permission be granted for the RECOMMENDED: reasons set out in this report and summarised at paragraphs 7.8–7.13, and subject to the conditions set out in section 8 of this report. 1.0 LOCATION 1.1 Allstone House is a portal steel frame warehouse building, 120m long and 30m wide, set on a 0.75 ha site within the built up area of Gloucester. The building accommodates a waste transfer station handling household, commercial and industrial wastes including putrescible and hazardous wastes. 1.2 The application site lies a short distance to the east of the city centre on former railway land immediately north of the main Gloucester to Birmingham railway. Access to the site is derived from a short private road that joins Myers Road to the west which in turn links with the A3042 Metz Way via Horton Road. Vehicles enter through a gateway in the north western corner of the fenced site and waste lorries track right to enter the building on the southern elevation. After depositing their load they leave via the same entrance and continue around the building in an anti-clockwise direction to leave via the gateway.
  • Promoter Organisation Name Works Reference Address 1 Address 2

    Promoter Organisation Name Works Reference Address 1 Address 2

    Promoter Organisation Works Reference Address 1 Address 2 Works Location Works Type Traffic Management Start End Works Status Works C/W Name GLOUCESTERSHIRE CARRIAGEWAY TYPE 4 - UP TO EY102-GH1902000001769 SPOUT LANE ABENHALL Spout Lane, Abenhall MINOR GIVE & TAKE 28/01/2020 28/01/2020 PROPOSED WORKS COUNTY COUNCIL 0.5 MS CARRIAGEWAY TYPE 4 - UP TO Gigaclear KA030-CU004986 GRANGE COURT ROAD ADSETT Left hand fork by post box to By the right hand sign post STANDARD GIVE & TAKE 20/01/2020 31/01/2020 IN PROGRESS 0.5 MS CARRIAGEWAY TYPE 4 - UP TO Gigaclear KA030-CU005493 51488 ALDERLEY TO NEWMILLS FARM ALDERLEY Turning With Mount House On It to Outside Old Farm MINOR GIVE & TAKE 23/01/2020 27/01/2020 PROPOSED WORKS 0.5 MS CARRIAGEWAY TYPE 4 - UP TO Gigaclear KA030-CU005494 THE OLD RECTORY TO THE FURLONGS ALDERLEY 200m Before The Gate House to End Of The Road MINOR GIVE & TAKE 23/01/2020 27/01/2020 PROPOSED WORKS 0.5 MS PRIVATE STREET (NO DESIGN. Bristol Water AY009-2561804 WINTERSPRING LANE ALDERLEY OUTSIDE KINERWELL COTTAGE MINOR GIVE & TAKE 28/01/2020 30/01/2020 PROPOSED WORKS INFO. HELD) Thames Water Utilities LAYBY BY REAR OF EAGLE LINE, UNIT 3, ANDOVERSFORD CARRIAGEWAY TYPE 2 - 2.5 TO MU305-000031399394-001 A40 FROM ANDOVERSFORD BY PASS TO A436 ANDOVERSFORD MINOR TWO-WAY SIGNALS 25/01/2020 29/01/2020 PROPOSED WORKS Ltd INDUSTRIAL ESTATE,GLOUCESTER ROAD, ANDOVERSFORD, C 10 MS CARRIAGEWAY TYPE 4 - UP TO Gigaclear KA030-CU005381 ARLINGHAM ROAD ARLINGHAM Outside The Villa to Outside St Mary Church STANDARD MULTI-WAY SIGNALS 27/01/2020 31/01/2020
  • Flooding Survey June 1990 River Tame Catchment

    Flooding Survey June 1990 River Tame Catchment

    Flooding Survey June 1990 River Tame Catchment NRA National Rivers Authority Severn-Trent Region A RIVER CATCHMENT AREAS En v ir o n m e n t Ag e n c y NATIONAL LIBRARY & INFORMATION SERVICE HEAD OFFICE Rio House, Waterside Drive, Aztec West, Almondsbury. Bristol BS32 4UD W EISH NRA Cardiff Bristol Severn-Trent Region Boundary Catchment Boundaries Adjacent NRA Regions 1. Upper Severn 2. Lower Severn 3. Avon 4. Soar 5. Lower Trent 6. Derwent 7. Upper Trent 8. Tame - National Rivers Authority Severn-Trent Region* FLOODING SURVEY JUNE 1990 SECTION 136(1) WATER ACT 1989 (Supersedes Section 2 4 (5 ) W a te r A c t 1973 Land Drainage Survey dated January 1986) RIVER TAME CATCHMENT AND WEST MIDLANDS Environment Agency FLOOD DEFENCE DEPARTMENT Information Centre NATONAL RIVERS AUTHORrTY SEVERN-TRENT REGION Head Office SAPPHIRE EAST Class N o 550 STREETSBROOK ROAD SOLIHULL cession No W MIDLANDS B91 1QT ENVIRONMENT AGENCY 0 9 9 8 0 6 CONTENTS Contents List of Tables List of Associated Reports List of Appendices References G1ossary of Terms Preface CHAPTER 1 SUMMARY 1.1 Introducti on 1.2 Coding System 1.3 Priority Categories 1.4 Summary of Problem Evaluations 1.5 Summary by Priority Category 1.6 Identification of Problems and their Evaluation CHAPTER 2 THE SURVEY Z.l Introduction 2.2 Purposes of Survey 2.3 Extent of Survey 2.4 Procedure 2.5 Hydrological Criteria 2.6 Hydraulic Criteria 2.7 Land Potential Category 2.8 Improvement Costs 2.9 Benefit Assessment 2.10 Test Discount Rate 2.11 Benefit/Cost Ratios 2.12 Priority Category 2.13 Inflation Factors
  • ~Ar H C Enc Conservat On

    ~Ar H C Enc Conservat On

    • ~ar h c enc conservat• on No. 32 January 1993 Contents fossils and landforms which underlie Editorial all the rest of our work. Geology and geomorphology underpin many of In Great Britain, the public's Making rocks talk 3 the properties that give landscape its interest in the earth sciences and, Making rocks scenic qualities - and remember, the consequently, their support for The copper king ofAnglesey natural beauty of the countryside is earth science conservation is - Parys Mountain revisited 6 the biggest asset of the tourist disappointingly low. The attention industry. The rocks not only given to the earth sciences and influence the kind of plants, animals, related issues in the popular press, The West Runton elephant 9 birds and insects which we find in on radio and on television is every part of the countryside, but correspondingly poor. Often the The Skye plesiosaur 11 also shape the lives and livelihoods of only exposure that adults get to our the human communities that live subject is through their children Coastal cell studies here. and the enthusiasm generated at Magnus Magnusson KBE, Chairman, Scottish Natural Heritage Yet the earth sciences tend to be, school. - a basis for coastal zone management . 12 alas, the Cinderella discipline. It is n 1 April 1992, a new If I were to pick out two words perceived to be a subject apart, But the cause of this lies not ,vith Earth science conservation training pack . 16 the media, not with the educators, conservation agency was born which were absolutely central to our poorly integrated with mainstream and not with the public not O - Scottish Natural Heritage ethos and operational methods, they conservation practice, too esoteric for wanting to know, but with us - the Conservation and landfill (SNH).