~Ar H C Enc Conservat On

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

~Ar H C Enc Conservat On • ~ar h c enc conservat• on No. 32 January 1993 Contents fossils and landforms which underlie Editorial all the rest of our work. Geology and geomorphology underpin many of In Great Britain, the public's Making rocks talk 3 the properties that give landscape its interest in the earth sciences and, Making rocks scenic qualities - and remember, the consequently, their support for The copper king ofAnglesey natural beauty of the countryside is earth science conservation is - Parys Mountain revisited 6 the biggest asset of the tourist disappointingly low. The attention industry. The rocks not only given to the earth sciences and influence the kind of plants, animals, related issues in the popular press, The West Runton elephant 9 birds and insects which we find in on radio and on television is every part of the countryside, but correspondingly poor. Often the The Skye plesiosaur 11 also shape the lives and livelihoods of only exposure that adults get to our the human communities that live subject is through their children Coastal cell studies here. and the enthusiasm generated at Magnus Magnusson KBE, Chairman, Scottish Natural Heritage Yet the earth sciences tend to be, school. - a basis for coastal zone management . 12 alas, the Cinderella discipline. It is n 1 April 1992, a new If I were to pick out two words perceived to be a subject apart, But the cause of this lies not ,vith Earth science conservation training pack . 16 the media, not with the educators, conservation agency was born which were absolutely central to our poorly integrated with mainstream and not with the public not O - Scottish Natural Heritage ethos and operational methods, they conservation practice, too esoteric for wanting to know, but with us - the Conservation and landfill (SNH). It is a government grant would be 'sustainability' and most tastes, too specialised, almost earth scientists. If we want to be - a question oftiming .. 18 aided agency, formed by the merger 'partnership'. The concept of too scholarly. To date, work in this up there with the wildlife people ­ of the old Nature Conservancy sustainability is not new - it has been field has been concentrated too much, who enjoy massive popular support Who would buy a coal tip? .. 20 Council and the former Countryside a buzz-word in international perhaps, at the academic end of the for their cause - we must cast off Commission for Scotland, and is environmental circles ever since the spectrum, as evidenced with the the image of living on a cloud of responsible to Parliament through the 1980 Word Conservation Strategy. preoccupation with massive learned Motorways can seriously improve your exposure . specialist terms and concepts, and 22 Secretary of State for Scotland. Some people are getting rather blase publications like the Geological come back down to earth. We have inhetited all the about it now, but in SNH we view it Conservation Review (GCR). That The Malvern International Conference on Geological responsibilities of the two agencies, very differently. We have been is not to say that the GCR is The Royal Society for Nature and Landscape Conservation . 24 and the combined expertise, presented with a sustainability unimportant - far from it; as long as Conservation, the Geologists' enthusiasm and commitment of their challenge in an Act of Parliament. the system of designating SSSIs Association, the three country staffs. We have brought together Our founding legislation, the Natural remains in place, we must have a conservation agencies and a Geology and the public in Glasgow .. 25 under one roof care both for Heritage (Scotland) Act 1991, enjoins sound academic justification for every handful of provincial museums are Scotland's areas of high nature us "to have regard to the desirability site we notify. all working towards giving the earth The hidden depths of geology . 26 conservation value and for landscape of securing £:Ilat anything done, It is not quite enough to say that sciences, and the conservation of quality. But our remit is even whether by SNH or any other person these sites are of scientific interest ­ geological and landscape features, a Fossils for profit broader than the sum of those of the in relation to the natural heritage of scientific interest simply means that it better public face. Clearly there is two predecessor bodies; we are also Scotland, is undertaken in a manner is of interest to scientists. If we are to - the Gilwern Hill controversy . an opportunity here for all involved 27 now concerned with the proper that is sustainable." gain public support for using public with the earth sciences and earth aspirations of the people of Scotland. But fostering environmental money to safeguard and protect science conservation to do likewise Book review . 28 Let me summarise our new remit. awareness - awareness of the natural documents from the past, we have to and 'sell' this fascinating chapter in The basis of our philosophy is simple helitage - is as important as any of be able to articulate valid reasons for the story of our national heritage in Snippets . 28 - we must sustain the natural heritage our tasks. Without public conservation which will have the widest possible sense. The if we want it to sustain us. understanding and appreciation, it relevance to the layman. We have to success of RIGS and the Earth science conservation is a twice yearly journal produced for the earth The aims and objectives of SNH will be much harder to achieve any of establish clear links between familiar development of ROCKWATCH science conservation community by English Nature, Scottish Natural Heritage are: our aims. Public support and public landscapes and the earth sciences; have shmvn what can be achieved ­ and the Countryside Council for Wales. We would like to thank all those who • to safeguard and enhance sympathy are, therefore, vital to our links which would provide the now it's up to us all to deliver! have assisted with the preparation of the magazine. However, the opinions Scotland's natural heritage ultimate success. That means we opportunity to explain the expressed by the contributors are not necessarily those of the above agencies. have to go out and explain ourselves countryside in terms of its geological Mike Harley Contact addresses for the editorial board are as follows: • to foster awareness and to the public who are our customers components, and the profound and understanding of the natural and clients. We have got to make cataclysmic processes which have heritage Managing editor Mike Harley, English Nature, Northrninster our language comprehensible, our shaped it. House, Peterborough PEl 1UA • to encourage public enjoyment of science relevant, our aspirations The balance between strict (Telephone 0733-318303) the natural heritage, and to meaningful. scientific accuracy and looser lay promote responsible public access Obviously some aspects of our intelligibility is not an easy balance to Editors Alan McKirdy, Scottish Natural Heritage, to it, in a way which does not Cover photo: A winter view work are more immediately user­ get right. But demystifying the Bonnington Bond, 2 Anderson Place, Edinburgh damage it towards Snowdon across Llynnau friendly than others. Mention wildlife subject is a problem which we can, EH65NP Mymbyr and Nantygwryd. The • to engage public support and and habitat conservation, and you and must, address more vigorously. (Telephone 031-554-9797) spectacular glaciated terrain of harness voluntary effort for the trigger an irnrnediate response Indeed, in SNH we have started Snowdonia and problems benefit of the environment amongst naturalists who love birds doing just that, with a pilot project Stewart Campbell, Countryside Council for and animals and flowers. Landscape which takes a series of 30 selected associated \vith its conserv'ation will Wales, Plas Penrhos, Ffordd Penrhos, Bangor, • to improve the natural environment be a major theme in the concluding in and around towns safeguard and countryside access can geological sites and tries to explain Gwynedd LL57 2LQ be equally emotive because they them in comprehensible language. field excursion of the ~1alvern (Telephone 0248-370444) • to encourage environmental International Conference on involve aesthetics and enjoyment. As custodians of the SSSI system, sustainability in all forms of But geology? SNH has inherited we in SNH have to be able to Geological and Landscape economic activity Conservation, to be held in July Editorial assistant Jo Collinge, English Nature, Northrninster considerable responsibilities for the persuade landowners and planners 1993. House, Peterborough PEl 1UA • to develop partnerships which support and public awareness of earth and industrialists of the crucial (Photo by Ste,vart Campbell) (Telephone 0733-318322). encourage joint action to achieve science conservation - the importance of safeguarding the rocky our aims. conservation of our heritage of rocks, documents of the past that are found •2 •3 A comprehensive redevelopment of the way in which it has changed and on their land, or the land which they agenda, and on people's personal the Knockan Visitor Centre and evolved over time. In taking familiar wish to utilise. And that will involve, agendas. It will certainly make the if I dare. say so, speaking in the designation of SSSIs, and their 11 geological trail, near Ullapool, is views and landmarks as the starting being planned at present. Knockan point, visitors, who for the most part language of the people, and not the concomitant constraints on potentially Cliff is a site of international renown will be unburdened by any prior esoteric shorthand of specialists. damaging activities, much more because of the important role it knowledge of the subject, will be led Frankly, there are times when the acceptable. played in the early development of back in time through changing citations on our notification There are several initiatives that we structural geology. Students and hill environments, using a variety of documents read like gobbledygook to are even now considering.
Recommended publications
  • Consultation Document
    Consultation Gloucestershire’s Local Transport Plan Document 2015-31 A reliable transport network providing door to door travel choices Gloucestershire Local Transport Plan 2015-2031 i Gloucestershire’s Local Transport Plan (2015 – 2031) Consultation Document Approved by Gloucestershire County Council Cabinet Date Approved 4th February 2015 Version 1.0 Last Revised February 2015 Review Date April 2015 Category Strategic Planning Owner Transport Planning Team Anyone wishing to comment on the County Council’s Local Transport Plan Target Audience Consultation Gloucestershire Local Transport Plan 2015-2031 CONSULTATION QUESTIONNAIRE ii Consultation Document Having your say Thank you for taking the time to respond to the first formal review of This phase of consultation will last for six weeks from 16th February until the 27th Gloucestershire’s third Local Transport Plan (LTP). The LTP sets the long term March 2015.You can register your views. strategy for transport delivery within Gloucestershire from 2015 to 2031. Within this consultation document a significant number of changes have been made from the Using the County Council’s consultation portal - existing LTP which was adopted in 2011. www.gloucestershire.gov.uk/consultations Downloading the documents from the County Council’s website - This consultation process seeks to understand the level of support for the http://www.gloucestershire.gov.uk/ltp3 and emailing your response to proposed changes relating to: [email protected] Accessing a paper copy from Gloucestershire Libraries or Council The proposed Link and Place Hierarchy for 2031; buildings and sending a completed questionnaire to The proposed update to the LTP’s policies; The proposed prioritisation of transport initiatives in the context of the new Strategic Planning Connecting Places Strategies (CPS); and Block 5, 1st floor, Shire Hall The removal of historic transport schemes from the highways register.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Local Transport Plan Consultation Document 1
    Gloucestershire’s Draft Draft Local Transport Plan Local Transport Plan Consultation | DOCUMENT 1 2015-31 Including the following strategy documents: A resilient transport network that enables sustainable economic growth • Overarching Strategy • CPS4 – South Cotswold Connecting Places Strategy providing door to door travel choices • CPS1 - Central Severn Vale Connecting Places Strategy • CPS5 – Stroud Connecting Places Strategy • CPS2 - Forest of Dean Connecting Places Strategy • CPS6 – Tewkesbury Connecting Places Strategy • CPS3 – North Cotswold Connecting Places Strategy This page is intentionally blank Draft Local Transport Plan consultation document 1 This document combines the following separate strategies into one document to aid the consultation process. Overarching Strategy CPS1 - Central Severn Vale Connecting Places Strategy CPS2 - Forest of Dean Connecting Places Strategy CPS3 – North Cotswold Connecting Places Strategy CPS4 – South Cotswold Connecting Places Strategy CPS5 – Stroud Connecting Places Strategy CPS6 – Tewkesbury Connecting Places Strategy This page is intentionally blank Gloucestershire’s Draft Local Transport Plan Overarching 2015-31 Strategy A resilient transport network that enables sustainable economic growth providing door to door travel choices Gloucestershire’s Draft Local Transport Plan - Overarching Strategy Local Transport Plan This strategy acts as guidance for anybody requiring information on how the county council will manage the transport network in Gloucestershire Overarching Strategy Document
    [Show full text]
  • Severn Estuary RCZAS Updated Project Design for Phase 2 Main
    Severn Estuary Rapid Coastal Zone Assessment Survey Updated Project Design for Phase 2 Main Fieldwork for English Heritage (HEEP Project No. 3885) Toby Catchpole and Adrian M. Chadwick Version 2 Revised, March 2010 Contents List of figures ............................................................................................................ iii Project details ............................................................................................................ v Summary ................................................................................................................. vii 1 Introduction and project background..................................................................1 2 Research aims and objectives ...........................................................................3 3 Summary of Phases 1 and 2a ...........................................................................5 3.1 Introduction .........................................................................................5 3.2 Sites identified as requiring further study in Phase 2a ......................... 5 3.3 The results of the Phase 2a fieldwork ................................................. 6 4 Project interfaces ...............................................................................................9 5 Communications and project products ............................................................. 11 6 Project review ..................................................................................................13 7 Health
    [Show full text]
  • BFC Vol 08.7 Construction Traffic Management Plan
    CTMP 8.7 CTMP Brechfa Forest Connection Development Consent Order Application - Reference EN020016 Construction Traffic Managment Plan May 2015 The Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 Regulation 5(2)(q) Construction Traffic Management Plan Document Details New Front Cover Required Document prepared by AMEC Foster Wheeler Cannon Court, Abbey Lawn, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY2 5DE 2 Construction Traffic Management Plan Contents 1 Introduction 7 1.1 Overview 7 1.2 Proposed development 8 1.3 Routing strategy 9 1.4 Mitigation measures 18 2 Site access and traffic management 20 2.1 Introduction 20 2.2 Overhead line section – south (accesses 1 to 46) 20 2.3 Underground cable section – (Accesses 91, 48-51) 23 2.4 Overhead line section – North (accesses 52 to 90) 24 2.5 Main contractors compound – (access 92) 26 2.6 Access types 26 2.7 Management of accesses 28 2.8 Local highway issues and constraints 29 2.9 Vehicle classification 33 2.10 Accesses 36 2.11 Construction vehicle routing to access locations 36 2.12 PRoW management plan 37 2.13 Scaffolding 37 2.14 Temporary traffic signage 39 2.15 Working hours 39 2.16 Timing of movements 40 3 Construction Traffic Management Plan 2.17 Banksman 40 2.18 Sustainable travel plans 40 2.19 Wheel/street cleaning 41 2.20 Highway condition surveys 41 3 Construction traffic routeing strategy 42 3.1 Introduction 42 3.2 Access to the Carmarthenshire area 43 3.3 Key strategic and local road links within the Carmarthenshire area 43 3.4 Route from main contractors
    [Show full text]
  • Promoter Organisation Name Works Reference Address 1 Address 2
    Promoter Organisation Works Reference Address 1 Address 2 Works Location Works Type Traffic Management Start End Works Status Works C/W Name GLOUCESTERSHIRE CARRIAGEWAY TYPE 4 - UP TO EY102-GH1902000001769 SPOUT LANE ABENHALL Spout Lane, Abenhall MINOR GIVE & TAKE 28/01/2020 28/01/2020 PROPOSED WORKS COUNTY COUNCIL 0.5 MS CARRIAGEWAY TYPE 4 - UP TO Gigaclear KA030-CU004986 GRANGE COURT ROAD ADSETT Left hand fork by post box to By the right hand sign post STANDARD GIVE & TAKE 20/01/2020 31/01/2020 IN PROGRESS 0.5 MS CARRIAGEWAY TYPE 4 - UP TO Gigaclear KA030-CU005493 51488 ALDERLEY TO NEWMILLS FARM ALDERLEY Turning With Mount House On It to Outside Old Farm MINOR GIVE & TAKE 23/01/2020 27/01/2020 PROPOSED WORKS 0.5 MS CARRIAGEWAY TYPE 4 - UP TO Gigaclear KA030-CU005494 THE OLD RECTORY TO THE FURLONGS ALDERLEY 200m Before The Gate House to End Of The Road MINOR GIVE & TAKE 23/01/2020 27/01/2020 PROPOSED WORKS 0.5 MS PRIVATE STREET (NO DESIGN. Bristol Water AY009-2561804 WINTERSPRING LANE ALDERLEY OUTSIDE KINERWELL COTTAGE MINOR GIVE & TAKE 28/01/2020 30/01/2020 PROPOSED WORKS INFO. HELD) Thames Water Utilities LAYBY BY REAR OF EAGLE LINE, UNIT 3, ANDOVERSFORD CARRIAGEWAY TYPE 2 - 2.5 TO MU305-000031399394-001 A40 FROM ANDOVERSFORD BY PASS TO A436 ANDOVERSFORD MINOR TWO-WAY SIGNALS 25/01/2020 29/01/2020 PROPOSED WORKS Ltd INDUSTRIAL ESTATE,GLOUCESTER ROAD, ANDOVERSFORD, C 10 MS CARRIAGEWAY TYPE 4 - UP TO Gigaclear KA030-CU005381 ARLINGHAM ROAD ARLINGHAM Outside The Villa to Outside St Mary Church STANDARD MULTI-WAY SIGNALS 27/01/2020 31/01/2020
    [Show full text]
  • Alvington Parish Neighbourhood Development Plan 2018 – 2026 Draft Document
    Draft Plan v1 Updates to Louise KIRKUP – June 2018 Louise, please note I have used the 41 page “word doc v1” for referencing the page numbers below, not the PDF edited version, which is out of sink by one (1) page. Ariel Font used. FRONT COVER Good Photo to follow for front cover please and also a range to illustrate text - see notes in red. Alvington Parish Neighbourhood Development Plan 2018 – 2026 Draft Document A Jpeg high resolution (as requested) photo expected end of June 2018 Note: was mailed via “We transfer” timed out before I was able to download. Only given 7 days! Or - for front cover do you want to use image on front of 2017 2018 Character Appraisal? If so please forward the image as a Jpeg. Same as picture as front cover of 2018 Appraisal/Assessment: jpeg expected June 2018 PAGE 4 of 41 Section Page Public Consultation 1.0 What is a Neighbourhood Development Plan (NDP)? 2.0 An NDP for Alvington 3.0 Draft Vision Statement and Objectives 4.0 Community Infrastructure 5.0 Reducing Flood Risk 6.0 Natural Environment 7.0 Built Environment 8.0 Housing Mix 9.0 Tackling Traffic and Improving Footpaths and Other Infrastructure (Or could be in an Appendix?) 10.0 Next Steps Appendices A Davis Page 1 of 38 30th June 2018 v6 PAGE 5 of 41 from XXX to XXX 2018. From September to October 2018 Come along to our open event at (insert date, time and location) 9th September 2018, Alvington Memorial Hall from 10am to 4 pm.
    [Show full text]
  • Promoter Organisation Name Works Reference
    Traffic Promoter Organisation Name Works Reference Address 1 Address 2 Town Works Location Description Works Type Start End Works Status Management GLOUCESTERSHIRE COUNTY A436 COUNTY BOUNDARY NO C/W EY030-1189/OXFORDSHIRE ADLESTROP ADLESTROP A424 Taynton Diversion Route for Oxfordshire MINOR 08/04/2021 08/04/2021 PROPOSED WORKS COUNCIL TO ADLESTROP JUNCTION INCURSION GLOUCESTERSHIRE COUNTY New foul water connection , Contractor: Dean Park Contractrs EY099-S50-00839 CHURCH LANE ALVINGTON ALVINGTON outside Barn Lodge MINOR GIVE & TAKE 06/04/2021 08/04/2021 PROPOSED WORKS COUNCIL Ltd ROAD FROM CLANNA Excavation to install fibre optic cable in surface location listed Gigaclear KA170-OCU-CRYY/0016 CLANNA ALVINGTON Works approx. 1251M, GL15 6AN MINOR ROAD CLOSURE 08/04/2021 08/04/2021 PROPOSED WORKS LODGE TO JUNCTION AT Approx 1000M of works to be carried out BC410- A48 FROM JUNCTION WITH HAZARDOUS SITE OPP THE LAURELS ON , A48 [Utility repair and maintenance works] Replace 1 jointbox frame IMMEDIATE BT SWAN HILL ALVINGTON TWO-WAY SIGNALS 07/04/2021 09/04/2021 IN PROGRESS TM00000500308286400 KNAPP LANE TO JUNCTION FROM JUNCTION WITH KNAPP LANE TO and cover(s) (625mm x 625mm) in Carriageway (EMERGENCY) GLOUCESTERSHIRE COUNTY ROAD FROM JUNCTION AT [Highway repair and maintenance works] Surface Dressing EY102-GH1901000005627 CLANNA ALVINGTON Clanna Lane Aylburton 807197 MAJOR ROAD CLOSURE 01/04/2021 31/08/2021 PROPOSED WORKS COUNCIL CLANNA COUNTRY PARK TO Clannna Lane Aylburton 807197 A48 FROM JUNCTION WITH works from jnc with knapp lane to jnc
    [Show full text]
  • Land at St Mellons, Cardiff
    Land at St Mellons, Cardiff Archaeological desk-based assessment May 2018 GGAT report no. 2018/030 Project no.P1950 A report for Cardiff Parkway Developments Ltd National Grid Reference: By Daria Dobrochna Dabal MA and ST 25048 80915 Sophie Lewis-Jones BA ACIfA The Glamorgan-Gwent Archaeological Trust Ltd Heathfield House Heathfield Swansea SA1 6EL Land at St Mellons, Cardiff: archaeological desk-based assessment Contents Page Summary…….. .......................................................................................................................... 3 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................... 3 Copyright notice ....................................................................................................................... 4 Abbreviations .......................................................................................................................... 4 1. Legislation, Policy and Guidance........................................................................................ 5 Legislation .................................................................................................................................. 5 Policy………………......................................................................................................................... 5 Standards and Guidance .............................................................................................................. 6 Local Development Plan ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Final Recommendations
    Final Recommendations November 2020 Final Recommendations 2 ONE REGION ONE NETWORK ONE TICKET 3 Final Recommendations Contents Foreword 1 Summary 3 Chapter 1: Introduction 9 Chapter 2: A new strategy for South East Wales 11 Chapter 3: Network of Alternatives 15 Chapter 4: Infrastructure package 21 Chapter 5: Network policies package 43 Chapter 6: Behaviour change package 50 Chapter 7: Transport governance package 58 Chapter 8: Land use and planning package 64 Chapter 9: Impacts 70 Chapter 10: Implementation 81 Chapter 11: After the Commission 85 Annex A: Our method 86 Mae’r ddogfen yma hefyd ar gael yn Gymraeg. This document is also available in Welsh. © Hawlfraint y Goron / Crown copyright 2020 WG41572 Digital ISBN 978-1-80082-414-0 1 Final Recommendations Foreword The First Minister established the Commission We are highly conscious that the continuing to investigate sustainable ways to tackle Covid-19 pandemic makes it a difficult time congestion on the M4 in South East Wales. This to make long-term decisions about transport. report sets out our final recommendations. For this reason, our recommendations are designed to be flexible and robust to changes Our work began with an analysis of traffic on in how people may choose to work and travel. the motorway. This led us to the three ‘fast- Our strong view is that Covid-19 does not track’ recommendations we put forward last alter the fundamental need to provide more December, each designed to improve M4 traffic transport options for South East Wales’ growing flow. We then went further and considered population, especially in the context of the broader questions about how people live, climate emergency.
    [Show full text]
  • Awre Blakeney Parish Plan 2005 to 8
    AWRE, BLAKENEY & AREA PARISH PLAN 2005-2008 Bideford Brook crossing under Awre Road at Nether Hall Farm Supported By: Funded by: Contents Page(s) Acknowledgements 3 1. Introducti on 4 2. Parish Plan Process 5 3. Parish of Awre –its history & traditions 6-10 4. Vision 11 5. Strengths,Weaknesses,Opportunities ,Threats 12 6. The Themes - summary 13 7. Community Facilities 14-17 8. Environment, Conservation, Heritage 18-20 9. Local Services 21 10. Housing 22 11. Roads & Traffic 23-24 12. Leisure 25 13. Health 26 14. Public Transport 27-28 15. Tourism 29-30 16. Crime & Safety 31 17. Help the Elderly 32 18. Education & Training 33 19. Local Economy/Business/Employment 34-36 20. Religion 37 21. Children 38 22. Young People 38-40 Appendices 41 A Activities underta ken in Stage A 42 B Activities undertaken in Stage B 43 C Activities undertaken in Stage C 44 D Opinion Former Survey Findings 45-53 E Summary of issues from public meeting 54-59 F Residents response to the Questionnaire 60-94 G Action Pla n 95-113 2 Acknowledgements Special thanks to the following for their support and dedication without whom the preparation of this draft plan would not have been achieved: Parish Plan Steering Committee Elaine Berger, Harry Clarke, Brian & Brid Ellingworth, Graham Nussey, Maggie & Graham Solari, Peter Watton, Eric Woods and Roy Zimmer. Parish Questionnaire Delivery Team: Elaine & Ian Berger, Glynn Bullock, Ursula Cross, Brian & Brid Ellingworth, Ernie Hale, Ann, Eric & Rebeka Hoyland, Michele Le Jossec, Carole Nolan, Graham Nussey, Barbara Morris, Graham & Maggie Solari, Derek Whitelock, Peter & Patricia Wightman, Christine Wischhusen, Eric Woods and Roy Zimmer.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2018 All Freetext Comments from Engagement Survey
    Outcome of Engagement Report – Summer 2018 All freetext comments from engagement survey respondents I think that the new community hospital should be in or near Cinderford because: It is central to the forest It is the most accessible part of the forest when there is severe weather. It is a central location within the forest, with good connections to other areas of the forest and wider Gloucestershire. It would make transferring between hospitals easier for patients. as part of my work role I cover the Forest of Dean currently based at the Dilke, on a one hour response time I can be anywhere in the Forest within this time frame based in either Coleford or Cinderford its central to North Forest - Maisemore, Corse, etc. More of a community area. This seems a better option as it is central to the forest and would be accessible to many. it would be in our locality and easiest to reach. It has good communications and is closest to my locality ITS CENTRAL TO THE WHOLE FOD CATCHMENT AREA Cinderford is a central location for residents across the FOD, when you take in locations in the Forest such as Newent, Coleford or Lydney would be too far to travel. It is in the most central location, with reasonably good public transport. If it was in Lydney this would be difficult for some people to access, especially people from Newent and surrounding areas. It is situated centrally between Lydney and Gloucester Central to the Forest. Close to area of high deprivation who may otherwise struggle to access healthcare.
    [Show full text]
  • LOCAL TRANSPORT PLAN REVIEW December 2014 FEEDBACK FROM
    LOCAL TRANSPORT PLAN REVIEW December 2014 FEEDBACK FROM STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOPS AUTUMN 2014 Version 1.0 Last Revised December 2014 Review Date Ongoing Category Strategic Infrastructure Owner Ben Watts Anyone wishing to obtain information on Gloucestershire County Target Audience Council’s Local Transport Plan consultation process GLOUCESTERSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL Local Transport Plan Review December 2014 Feedback from stakeholder workshops Contents Amendment Record This report has been issued and amended as follows: Issue Revision Description Date Signed 1.0 Agreed document 08/01/15 BW Contents 1.0 Introduction 1 2.0 Workshops 1 3.1 Tewkesbury 3rd October 2014 3 3.2 Moreton-in-Marsh 7th October 2014 4 3.3 Cirencester 8th October 2014 5 3.4 Brockworth 9th October 2014 6 3.5 Nailsworth 22nd October 2014 8 3.6 Mitcheldean 24th October 2014 9 3.7 Cheltenham 28th October 2014 11 3.8 Stow-on-the-Wold 11th November 2014 13 1.0 Introduction In response to feedback received by Stakeholders at the Information Sharing event in July 2014 a revised consultation strategy was developed for the Local Transport Plan (LTP) Review which included a series of stakeholder workshops held during the autumn 2014. This document sets out the headlines from those workshops alongside the secondary documents which form part of the wider evidence base to inform the development of the Connecting Places Strategies (CPS). A public consultation on the Local Transport Plan Review including details of the Connecting Places Strategies is planned for spring 2015. Please note that the information provided within this summary document does not provide a definitive record of everything which was discussed at the consultation events and are not representative of the views of Gloucestershire County Council, Atkins or Harris Ethical.
    [Show full text]