Cover Story The Maze Navigating it with Professional Precision

by Elizabeth Shown Mills, CG, CGL, FASG

T~t and charts copyright © 2005 by the amhor

Half . Removed cousi ns. Cross cousins. Parallel cousins. one poi nt: they have to know and precisely use the languages Avuncular kin. Uterine si blings. Agnatic lines. "Degrees" of of those other fields. Confusion ove r kinship terms may exist kinship by canonical definition, and contradictory degrees cal­ within [he general public, and "ge neral" dictionaries may offer cuiated with genetic coefficients. Today's genealogists routinely multiple defi nitions based on contradi ctory ways in which the work amid a maze of relationships and kinship terms that draw public uses kinship terms; but loosey-goosey language by a gene­ from law, church history, geneti cs. and , as well as alogist can sabotage not juSt a project but also a career path. "popular custom." This paper discusses the from seven perspectives pur­ Precision is essential for professionals in our field . Modern sued within the genealogical field-that is. forensic. genetic. is interdisciplinary, and many who practi ce it profes­ canonical, legal. anthropological. historical, and everyday usage. sionally work with counterparts in disciplines. All agree on :orensic Perspective what matters to the Army is that [relatives] tap into the soldier's Professional genealogist Kathleen W Hinckley, CGRS, works maternal line at some point and consequently sport the same laily within that language maze. As a specialist in legal and mtDNA." Whether Smolenyak locates or fifth cousi ns orensic genealogy, she assists nOt only attorneys in the setde­ once removed, the key factor is that "the maternal connection is nent of estate cases but also the U .S. military in efforts to iden­ substantiated. So, yes," she agrees, "precision is required" in the ify remains believed co have been prisoners of war or military identification of relationships. I ,ersonnel missing in action. Figure 1 charts the results of a forensic investigation, using According to Hinckley, "Both law firms and the military conventional symbols for a genetic pedigree. 1 It is useful for equire me to identify the relationship of each living relative to demonstrating that do and do not qualify. H owever, he target person-the exact relationship. laws are the chart that accompanies a professio nal genealogical report Icecise and vary among states . Some allow half-kin [0 inherit would be a more-conventional box-style drop charco Figure 2 nd some do not. All 'half' relationships must be identified, shows highlights of a chart that might support a typical probate ncluding half-siblings, half-, half-, and half-cous­ case and illustrates the manner in which individuals might be ns (offspring of the half- or half-). Otherwise, some identified within their boxes. .eople might inherit when they should not," Hinckley also emphasizes the importance of producing Megan Smolenyak also ass ists the Army in locating PNOK charts that specifically identify each person's relationship to primary next of kin) and maternal relatives whose DNA can be the key individual. "In most of my projects," she states, "I \sed to identify the remains of soldiers. According to Smolenyak, GEDCOM the information from my current genealogical When it comes to locating mitochondrial DNA candidates, software into to create box drop-charts that visu- ally outline the relationships. On the top line of each box, beside the individual's name, I add Figure 1 Genetic Charting of mtDNA Candidates for the relationships-such as 2C IR [second , Identifying the Remains of a Soldier Missing in Action (MIA) once removed] or Y21 C [half-first cousin]." Also important to Kathy's clients is that parallel gen- erations be precisely aligned on charts. Although Generations is no longer marketed, Kathy reports finding no other genealogical software that lets her produce the kind of drop charts she needs to prepare. Forensic genealogists working in many coun­ tries outside the United Scates encounter che same legal requirements for precise identification of relationships. Most are governed by confidential­ ity rules similar to chose that prevent Hinckley from offering a specific as an example. Conclusion: However, it is not difficult to locate published Two candidates exist: the soldier's first cousin , Male E, legal cases that demonstrate how precise language and his half-first cousin, H. such as "double-first cousi ns," " cousins, twice removed" and "half cousins" govern eligibility fo r Figu re 1 depicts a typical problem, using conventional pedigree symbols: a square for males, inheritance from a particular estate. 2 a circle for fem ales-with an added slash for those who are deceased . The MIA was an only . His (B) and his grandmother (A) are dead, so their mtONA cannot be used to Genetic Perspective determine whether the remains that have been found are indeed those of the missi ng soldier. Anita Lustenberger, who is both a Certified The grandmother was married twice. By her first , she had the soldier's mother (B) and Genealogist and a Certified Genetic Counselor, a (e) who, in turn, died leaving one (E). E carries his mother mtONA but cannot also describes precise language as critical to both pass it to his daughter (I), who would inherit her own mother's mtONA. Even though E had two fields. As a genetic counselor, Lustenberger points half- (F and G), their mtONA came from a different mother, who was no kin to the MIA. Out that a person's risk for inheriting a trait, "is Meanwhile, the MIA's mother (B) had a half-sister (0), born of A's second . 0, also proportional to the closeness of the relationship was only a half-aunt to the MIA, but she inherited her mother'S rptDNA and passed dece~sed, of the . Geneticists need to know precisely it to her daughter (HI. the soldier'S half-first cousin. Therefore, the male E and the female H what percentage of cheir genes a couple shares, in could be used for a mtONA test to help identify remains that were believed to be the family's order to determine their risk of producing a child missing soldie r. with a genetic disease. "3 Figure 2 Typical Box-Chart for Heirs to the Estate of an Intestate Decedent (ID)

Martin Milburn Minshew Estate CASE NO. 1234567 PREPARED BY: [etc.) DATE: [etc.]

, ,, , , Martin Mi lburn Minshew, Intestate Decedent , bd. 1 Apr 1942, Phoenix, Maricopa, Arizona , dd. 2 Jun 1967, Chicago, Cook, Illinois , \, m. Never Married! No Children , ,

, Margaret Carrie Odom, 1 st Cousin , Marshal Minshew, 1h 2Cl R bd. 5 May 1944, Phoenix, Maricopa, Arizona bd. 19 Jan 1921, near Houston, Harris, Texas m. James Breland, 1 Jan 1965, Phoenix m. Sarah Boyd CURRENT ADDRESS: [etc.] CURRENT ADDRESS: [etc.] \, ,,

Milburn R. Minshew, GGUncie Mary Minshew, 1f.!: GGAunt bd. Oct 1867, North Carolina bd. 28 Feb 1870, Sparta, Hancock, Georgia dd. 20 Jan 1932, Phoenix, Maricopa, Arizona dd. abt 1904, Burley, Cass, Idaho m. Sophie Peace m. abt 1888, Cornelius Cargill

D Individuals who are deceased or left no known heirs _ Living heirs for whom current whereabouts are known _ A reputedly living heir for whom a current address is not known Note: The actual chart submitted by the professional would be large enough to contain all data in proper position. Because of space constraints here, this figure depicts only a thumbnail sketch, with selected boxes enlarged to show the type of data included. Some attorneys also request that individual boxes on a chart be sequentially and prominently numbered, for easy reference. The above "family" is entirely fictional. Figure 3 Degrees of Kinship: Genetic (Based on fractional proportion of genes shared by two people)

o PROBAND PROBAND (KEY IDENTICAL PERSON) TWIN

FRACTION OF GENETIC FRACTION OF GENETIC DEGREE GENES SHARED COEFFICIENT DEGREE GENES SHARED COEFFICIENT I 112 .5 5 1/32 .0312 2 114 .25 6 1164 .0156 3 118 .125 7 11128 .0078 4 1/16 .0625 8 11256 .0039

COMPLEX RELATIONSHIPS: Identical , being genetically the same, are said to be related in the 0 degree. When identical twins marry in succession the same or woman, children of both unions are genetically full siblings (l st degree, coef­ ficient .5). When identical twins take different , their children are genetically half-siblings (2d degree, coefficient .25).

Double-first cousins (3d-degree relatives in two lines) would be the genetic equivalent of2d-degree relatives, sharing 114 of their genes, with a genetic coefficient of .25. The genetic equivalent for more complicated multiple relationships may be calculated by adding the genetic coefficient of each relationship.

Example 1: I st cousin (3d degree) .125 I st cousin, once removed (4th degree) .0625 Total genetic coefficient for the double relationship .1875

Example 2: Half-uncle (3d degree) .125 2nd cousin, once removed (6th degree) .156 Total genetic coefficient for the double relationship .281 Researchers who study gene trans­ Shawket and the canonical (church) and miss ion patterns define relationships civil degrees that were used for centuries with extreme care, using coefficients fo r before Gregor Mendel introduced genet­ each degree of kinship that were first cal- ics to the world. Figure 4 graphs degrees of kinship found in marital dispensations culated in a class ic 1921 study by Sewall Degrees of kinship Wr i ght:~ Profess ional genealogists who genealogists seek from Catholic archives seek employmenr in genetic research under canon and civil fo r spouses who are known to have a projects would benefit from studying consaoguina! (blood) or affinal (marital) the genetic usage of kinship terminol­ law are often several kinship. ogy within published papers, many of fu figures 3 and 4 (see facing aod s which are avail able online. The impli­ steps closer than following pages) both illustrate, degrees cations of assorted half-cousin relation­ of kinship under canon and civil law ships, for exampl e, are stressed in genetic genetic degrees. are often several steps closer than genet­ papers published at the websites of Johns ic degrees. Historically, the number of Hopkins University's Online Mendelian degrees equalled the number of gen­ Inheritance in Man,6 the Journal ofMedi- erations removed from a common ances­ cal Genetics'? and the American Journal of tor. By mat reckoning. first cousins are Genetics,S among others. second-degree kin because each is twO Address ing cousinships in particular, Elizabeth A. Thomp­ steps removed from the common , second cousins are son, author of the textbook Peaigree Analysis in Human Genetics, third-degree kin, and so forth. Resea rchers who use marital reminds researchers that "corresponding to each co usin-type dispensations from church archives wi ll also find couples said relationshi p there is a half-co usin one, when only one member of to be "rel ated in the second-to-third degree" (a kinship genealo­ an ancestral couple is a co mmon ances tor to both individuals."9 gists typically describe as first cousi n, once removed) or "third Thompson makes her point with a discussion of "half-first to fourth degree" (second cousin, once removed). In Latin-lan­ cousins" (first co usins with only one in common), guage registers used in some regions, one also finds stated rela­ "octuple half-seco nd cousins" (second cousins with one com­ tionships such as "in gradu secunda contacto terrio," meaning mon ancestOr in each of their eight great-grandparent positions) "in second degree touching the third" (again, first cousin, once and one-and-one-half cousins" (individuals with three separate removed). ]2 half-first cousin relationships). Thompson goes on to caution, "In some tex ts first cousi ns once removed are referred to as one­ Legal Perspective and-one-half cousins, but this convention can cause confusion The overlapping bounds of church and state in past centuries between the degree and the multiplicity of a relationship. "10 caused religious terminology to bleed into civil and co mmon The genetic calculation of degrees of relationship is empha­ law-and vice-versa. As Brian Schwimmer of the University of sized by Thomas H. Shawker, M.D., who chairs the National Manitoba School of Anthropology points out, "Western kinship Genealogical Society's Family Health and Committee degree calculations have varied historically and geographically and authored the society's recent guide to the intersection of between the Roman or civil system and the Germanic or canon genetics and genealogy. \ \ sys tem, which is currently the standard both in Catholic church "First-degree relatives," Shawker explains, "include one's regulations and English common law. "l3 children, sibli ngs, and parents. You share one-half of your O ut of the legal heritage of Medieval Western civilization genes with them. Second-degree relatives include , comes three other kinship terms that genealogists frequently grandchildren. aunts. uncles, nieces, and nephews; they share encounter: agnatic. uterine, and german. Traditional one-fourth of their genes. A half-sister or half- wo uld be have emphasized the agnatic lines-i.e., those "derived from or a second-degree relative, not first degree. Normally fi rst cousins through males"-and property often fo llowed agnatic descent. wo uld be third-degree relatives (alo ng with great-grandparents. Uterine, meaning "born of the same mother," has typically great-grandchildren, great-uncles, great-aunes, half-uncles, and been applied to relationships and, more commonly at half-aunrs) and share one-eighth of their genes. A half-first law. to or sisters who have different . The term cousin would be a fourth-degree relative, sharing one-sixteenth german (which refers not to an ethnicity but comes from the of their genes." (See Figure 3.) Latin wotd germen, meaning "twig" or "sprout"), is legally used to mean "whole" or "full. " Brothers-german, for example, have Canonical Perspective both a and mother in common. Cousins-german are the As regular users of church archives, genealogists also need children of "whole" sibli ngs (i.e., fi rst co usin s, bur nOt half-first to distinguish berween the genetic degrees described above by cousins) .14 Figure 4 Degrees ofKjnship: Canon Law (Based on number of generations removed from the anceSlOr shared by two people)

PERSON TO BE MARRIED D D DISPENSATION MARRIAGE DISPENSATION DIFFICULT FORBIDDEN LESS DIFFICULT

o.nthropological Perspective eal and kinship biases, because of the intense interest Genealogists working with anthropologists---or with lin­ in Native American research. Here, the problem is compounded ~ages that have Eastern and Middle-Eastern roots--encounter a by the fact that relationships in many tribes were calculated dif­ unship concept rarely found in Western : cross cousins ferently, even when early European-Americans described them md parallel cousins. When cousins are connected by parents of using kinship terms familiar to us. iifferent genders (father's sis ter's children or mother's brother's Amid a discussion of Native American cultural differences, :hildren), they are called cross cousins. Those whose connecting the historian and professional genealogist Rachal Mills Lennon, Jarents are of the same gender (o ne's father's brother's children CGRS, explains: "Because of matrilineal descent, Southeastern Jr mother's sister's children) are parallel cousins. Whether those tribal culture held that a person's most important male rela­ :ousins, themselves, are males or is irrelevant in both tive-the one termed father-was the mother's brother, not the :ases, anthropologically, although the gender of the cousins biological father. ... When referring to sisters and brothers, they :ould have implications in any specific culture. might mean uterine siblings (siblings born of their mother) or Some societies also distinguish between cousins who are the children of their mother's sisters."!? Jatrilateral (related through one's father) and matrilateral (relat­ Genealogists who work with anthropologists should also :d through one's mother)-with marital preferences favoring note a caution offered by Carolyn Ybarra, an anthropologist me or the other. fu; an example, Bedouins in both and and professional genealogist: "Anthropologists, when compar­ \.cab countries traditionally calculate kinship patrilineally (from ing across cultures, don't use the terms used by the group being nales to their offspring), and their preferred spouses are patrilat­ studied, but rather our own generic terms developed for the :ral parallel cousins (a father's brother's child). 15 purpose of being clear about specific types of relationships. " On The cu ltural belief in many such societies that patrilateral the other hand, Ybarra adds, anthropologists do employ "local larallel cousins are more closely akin than matrilateral parallel terminology used by people within a cultural group, to represent :ousins or cross cousins on either side does go countergrain to an insider's view of the specific relationships within a culture." ;enetic evidence. Nonetheless, the belief persists and it creates mportant distinctions for genealogists who work in these cul­ Historical Perspective ures, as well as for those who study Biblical literature. 16 The kinship maze through which genealogists weave their American genealogists are more likely to work with matrilin- way across place and time is also rife with other problems caused Glossary of Kinship Terms" Copyright 2005, Elizabeth Shown Mills

Affinal relationships: Kinships acquired by Cousins: Historically used for any relation­ Variations of the term also carried nega­ marriage laffinit;1. Historically, affinal ship, also used in some societies for tive connotation such as kinships were also a bar to marriage. close friends of the family. Specific For the counterpart of this term, see forms of the term include the follow­ A "cousin Betty": A derogatory term for consanguinal relationships. ing: a woman of questionable morals or a half-w it. Agnatic: Related on or descended from the Cater cousin (aka quarter cousin). father's side or male line. For the gender Originally, a way of saying "a Cousin Jan, Cousin Jacky. Nicknames counterpart, see uterine. cousin the fourth degree," but also for a person from Cornwa ll. used for other remote degrees of To make a cousin of: To beguile, deceive, Aunt: The sister of one's father or mother. kinship. Socia lly used for the of one's bio­ or impose upon. logical uncle. Also used in some societ­ Cousin german: A full, first cousin; i.e ., Degree of kinship: Icanonical, civil) The num­ ies for close friends of one's parents the child of one's full aunt or full ber of generational "steps" between la that usually denotes uncle. individuals; applied principally to respect). couples seeking permission to marry. Cross cousin: The child of a mother's Igenetic) Used to calculate the relation­ Avuncular: Pertaining to or similar to an brother or a father's sister. uncl e. ships between any two individuals who Cousin brutes: Historical ly, a family at share one or more . Canonical Back-door kin: A vernacular term denoting large. and civil degrees of kinsh ip can differ distant kinship, suggesting a perceived rad ically from genetic degrees of kin­ lower status. ~irty cousin: Historically, a contemptu­ ship. ous form of address for distant Beau-frere: French term for brother-in-law or kin. Double relationships: A term used when stepbrother. people share two lines of descent from First cousin: The child of one's full aunt a common ancestor, as when cous­ Beau-s(Eur: French term for sister-in-law or or full uncle. ins marry. For example: Double-first stepsister. cousins are the offspring of unions in Half-first cousin: The child of one's half­ wh ich siblings from one family marry or : See Cognatic descent. aunt or half-uncle. mate with siblings from another family. Brother: A male chi ld born of the same The terminology is extended to multiple Kentish cousin. An early English term relationships of other types by using a mother and father. IA male child born of for "distant relative. " the mother or father by a different union different ordinal-i.e., triple, octuple, wou ld be a half-brother.) Historically, Kissing cousin: A more or less dis­ etc. the term brother included the brother tant relative, familiar enough to be : Marriage within one's own cul­ of one's . In Native American greeted with a . tural, po litical, or social group. matrilineal systems, a brother might be a biological brother or the son of a Parallel cousin: The child of one's moth­ : Marriage outside one's own cu l­ mother's sister. er's sister or one's father's brother. tural, political, or social group.

Cognate: One related by blood; one who Second cousin: A child of the first cousin Father: The male . Historically used shares a common ancestor. of one's parent. Sometimes used for the father of one's spouse. Among impreci sely by laymen in reference Native American matrilineal systems, Cognatic descent: lanthropological) Descent to "first cousin once removed." father might mean a mother's brother. counted along both the mother's and IBy this latter mode of calculation, the father's line; also called bilateral one's actual second cousin is usu­ Fictive kin: A term for individual s, unrelated descent. ally called a "third cousin.") by either birth or marriage, who have an emotional connection similar to a family Collateral kin: Relatives not in a direct line. Historically, cousin was also used in relationship. Consanguinal relationships: Relationships ways that denoted intimacy or familiar­ bound by "blood"-i.e., biological ones. ity rather than kinship-as by sover­ cont'd For its counterpart, see affinal relation­ eigns or noblemen to address peers. ships. by etymological evolution. Within any ship terminology. Our common needs given society, words evo lve and mean- have already produced a cross-discipline ings change. In a seventeenth-century vocabulary that all can use for clear and will, the Englishman John Hill may Even relationships consistent meaning. leave a bequest to a man he calls "my Some of those terms are generic, nephew, James Alden." While the natu­ defined by the some are quite precise. Some overlap ral assumption might be that James was other terms, either cotal1y or panially­ the child of Hill's sister who had wed a term "in-law" have as with the historical terms agnatic and man named Alden, the reality might be ctianged across uterine to refer to paternal and maternal that James was a grandson. Nephew and lines that anthropologists call patrilineal niece, hiscorical1y, were terms also used time-with the term and matrilineal-bur that overlap offers for grandchildren. options rather than contradictions. The Similarly, Hill's refe rence to "my formerly including very richness of this common vocabulary brother Samuel Parks," would not neces­ is its strength. Once we learn it, we are sarily mean that Hill had a half-brother stepkin. all able to communicate with precision of a differem . In Anglican and among ourselves and with clarity from Catholic societies, wherein brothers-i n- one field CO another. law and sisters-in-law represented an affi- nal relationship that barred marriage, a spouse's brother or sister Notes was routinely referred to as "my brother" or "my sis ter. " 1. Useful backg ro und on forensic genealogy for military identifi­ Even relationships defined by the term "in-law" have cation, including a chart graphing "Eligible Donors of mlDNA changed across time-with the term formerly including stepkin. Samples," can be found at Joint POW/MIA Accounting Command [JPAC] . As explained in a now-classic essay by the late genealogist Walter Lee Sheppard, CG, FASG, "The phrase 'in law' ... refers to any 2. For examp le, "Testate and Intestate Succession, April 2001," Jer­ relationship that results from a legal action, as for instance a mar­ sey Legal Information Board . riage, , etc: 18 3. For genetic software that assists with charting and calcu latin g Everyday Practice genetic percentages or kinship coefficients, genealogists may wa ntto explore PREST and PedKin. Amid a recent discussion of cousinship terminology on the APG listserve, Carolyn Earle Billingsley, ph .D. (Hist.), of 4. Sewall Wright, "Systems of Mating," Genetics 6 (March 1921): I I 1- the Samford University Institute of Genealogy and Historical 78. For a specific application of these kinship coefficients to gene­ alogy, one that shows a surprisingly small genetic impact upon Research. concluded: "It is imperative that we adopt and define families with extensive intermarriage in the past, see John M. the terms that allow us the most precision in our construction Kingsbury, "Interconnecting Blood lines and Genetic in and analysis ofkinship."19 a Colon ial Puritan Community Eastern Massachusetts, 1630- 1885." Taking that precision one step funher. Michael Neill of the National Genealogical Society Quarterly 84 (June 1996): 8,...101. Genealogical Institute of Mid-America dryly responded that his 5. One starti ng point might be Laura Almasy and John Slangero, kinfolk were related to each other in so many ways that they "Multipoint Quantitative-Trait Linkage Analysis in General "defY any attempt to create specific definitions." Neill's solution Pedigrees," American Journal of Human Genetics 62 (1998) is to explicitly name each link in a kinship chain that connects 1998- 2111 , avai lable through the National Li brary of Medicine's Person A to Person B. "Instead of sayi ng Grandpa and Edna were PubMed, an online gateway for various medical journals . and Edna's mother, Sarah, were , children of 6. For examp le, see Johns Hopkins University, "#257320 lissenceph­ Sam and Annie. " 20 aly Syndrome, Norma n-Roberts Type," Online Mendelian Inheri­ For Neill and others whose writings may not have space limi­ tance in Man; ibid., "'110800 Adult i Blood Group with Congenital Cataract"; and ibid., "'263800 Gitelman Syndrome" , usi ng ONlM search op\ion. those such as Hinckley whose professional assignments require them to identifY relationships precisely amid all the other data 7. For example, see S. L. Kanagawa el ai., "Omphalo cele in Three s with Autosomal Dominant Tran smission," JMG that must fit into a small box on a drop chart, brevity is key. Online . As genealogists, our professional practices are quite divorse, although we are all bound by that need for precision. Because 8. Tracey Weiler, Cheryl R. Greenberg, et ai., "A Gene for Autosomal Re cessive Lim-Girdle Muscular Dystrophy ... ," American Jour­ genealogy is an interdisciplinary field, we work with related nal of Human Genetics 63 (1998): 140-47, downloadable in PDF fields that have also wrestled with the same need for precise kin- Glossary of Kinship Termso, cont'd

German: A term used to indicate full re lation­ Matriarchal: A system in which a family or are charted to a common ancestor. For ships, as in brothers-german (for those society is governed by females. example: The child of one's first cousin who have both parents in common) or would be a first cousin , once removed; cousins-german (for first cousins whose Matrilateral: Collateral kinships derived the grandchild of one's first cousin connecting parents are full siblings). through one 's mother. would be a first cousin, twice removed; the child of one's second cousin 'would Grand-aunt/uncle: the sibling of one's grand­ Matrilineal: Descent through the female be one's second cousin, once removed; parent; otherwise cal led great-aunt/ line. etc. uncle. Matrilocal: (anthropology) Denotes a cou­ Sibling: A brother or a sister. Grandparen t: The parent of one's own par­ ple's settlement. after marriage, amid the wife's kin. ent. Shirttail kin: A vernacular term for distant kin, often implying a lesser social status. Great-aunt/uncle: The sibling of one's grand­ Mother: The female parent. Historically used pare nt; othe rwise called grand-aunt/ also for the mother of one's spouse. Sibship: A genetic short form for a . uncle. Natural child: A child born of one's body; a Great-grandparent: The parent of one's biological child in modern terrninology. Sister: A female child born of the same set grandparent. Historically, the term applied to chil­ of parents. (A female child born of the dren born outside of a legal union; in mother or father by a different union Half relationships: Those that stem from a societies that had both church and civil would be a half-sister) Historically, the ha lf-s ibling kinship. For eve,ry lateral or marriage, the term might be used by term sister was also used for the sister co llateral relationship a "half" equiva­ the church for children born of a legal of one's spouse. In Native American lent exists. For example: civil union that had not been blessed by matrilineal systems, a sister might be the church with which the parents were a biological sister or the daughter of a Half-aunt/uncle: The half-sibl ing of affiliated. mother's sister. one's parent. Niece: The female child of one's sister or Step relationships: A parental or sibling Half-first cousin: The child of a half­ brother. Historically, the term also relationship acquired through marriage, aunt or half-uncle. included grandchildren, although this with no "blood" connection; examples: usage is rarely seen within the last two stepbrother, , Half-first cousin, once removed: The centuries. child of a half-first cousin. Twins: Two offspring born at the same birth. Nephew: The male child of a sister or broth­ More specific terms include Half-second cousin: The grandchild of a er Historically, used for grandchildren half-si ster or half-brother of one's also, although this usage is rarely seen Dizygotic twins: Those developed from grandparent. within the last two centuries. two separate fertilized eggs, com­ monly called fraternal twins. Half-sibling: A brother or sister who Paternal: Derived or inherited from one's shares only one parent; a mother's father. Monozygotic twins: Those developed child born of a different father, or from the same fertilized egg; com­ a father's child born of a different Patriarchal: A system in which a family or monly called identical twins. mother. society is governed by males. Uncle: The brother of one's mother or father. In-law: A term currently used for a blood Patrilateral: Collateral kinships derived Socially used for the husband of a relative of one's spouse-as in broth­ through one's father. biological aunt. Also used in some soci­ er-in-Iaw. sister- in-law, mother-in-law, eties for close friends of one's parents Patrilineal: Descent through the male line. father-in-law, aunt-in-Iaw, etc. Socially, (a fictive kinship that usually denotes the spo use of one's spouse's sibling. Patrilocal: (anthropology) Denotes a couple's respect) . Histori call y, the term included step rela­ settlement. after marriage, amid the Uterine: Born of the same mother but not tionships as wel l. husband's kin . the same father; a term extended to Kinship coefficients: The mathematical per­ Proband: (geneti c) The key figure; the one aunts, cousins, and other relationships centage us ed by geneticists to quantify from whom all other relationships are acquired through a mother. For the the rel ati onship between relatives. calculated : gender counterpart of this term, see agnatic. Maternal: Derived or inherited from one's Removed relationships: Cousinships that mother. involve a half-step when generations . lized Tribes: Southeastern Indians prior to Removal (Baltim ore: 9. Elizabeth A. Thompson , Pedigree Analysis in Human Genetics Ge nealogical Publ ish ing Co ., 2002). 26. (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986), 18. 18. Walter Le e Sheppard, "Interpreting Genea logical Records:' Genealogical Research: Methods and Sources, re v. ed ., 2 vols. 10. Ibid ., 19. (Washington: American Society of Genea lo gists, 1980, 1983), 11. Thomas H. Shawker, Unlocking Your Genetic History (Nashville, 1:18- 26, especially 21. Tenn .: Rutledge Hill Press, 2004) . 19. Carolyn Earle Billingsley, "Ha lf Cousins," e-mail to APG-L sub­ 12. A useful 'Table of " by canonical law is availab le scribers, Sunday, March 20, 2005, 8:02 P.M.; messages from this from "Consanguinity," Catholic Encyclopedia . com> under key word s "mail ing lists" then "genea logical societ­ 13. Brian Schwimmer, "Systems of Measuring Kinship Degre e" ies." . Schwimmer's site offers a well-explain ed intro­ ibid. du ction to civil, canonical, and collateral kinship degrees. 14. The standard source for legal definitions of kinship terms is Black's Law Dictionary; any of the editions published by West A genealogical researcher, writer, editor, and Publi sh ing Co. and its predecessors since 1891 will suffice. /ectltrer, Elizabeth Shown Mills has served 15. Department of Anthropology, Palomar University, "Marriage APG as a trustee and a regional vice-presi­ Ru les," Sex and Marriage . See also Aviad E. Raz at aI., "Perceptions of thanks Donn Devine, J.D., CC, CCL; Kathleen among Young Bedouin Adults in Isra el," Mar­ W Hinckley, CCRS; Anita Lustenberger, cc; riage & Family Review37, issue 3(2004): 27-46. Thomas H Shawker, M .D.; Megan Smolenyak; 16. For Bib lical perspectives, see Jim Belote (University of Minne­ and Carolyn Ybarra, Ph.D., for their comments sota- Duluth), "Marriage of Cousins," Kinship and Family in the and suggestiom "pon early drafts ofthis paper. Bible .