Worlebury Camp Hillfort

Conservation Management Plan 2018 – 2025

1 Contents

Figures & Illustrations ...... 3 1. Introduction ...... 4 2. Site Description ...... 5 2.1 General information ...... 5 Map of Worlebury Camp ...... 8 3. Historical & Archaeological Background ...... 9 3.1 Archaeological investigations of Worlebury Camp ...... 10 3.2 Features of the hillfort ...... 11 4. Previous Management of Worlebury Camp ...... 16 5. Worlebury Hillfort Project ...... 18 6. Management issues ...... 20 6.1 Overview ...... 20 6.2 Heritage Threats ...... 20 6.2.1 Forestry and scrub growth ...... 20 6.2.2 Erosion ...... 23 6.3 Heritage Crime ...... 23 6.3.1 Removal of objects ...... 24 6.3.2 Littering and fire settings ...... 25 7. Site management - aims and objectives ...... 26 8. Work Plan ...... 27 References ...... 37 Glossary ...... 38 Appendix 1 – Research potential / projects ...... 39 Appendix 2 – Removal of trees and vegetation (including restoration of limestone grassland) ..... 40 Appendix 3 – Condition Survey Report 2018 ...... 42

2 Figures & Illustrations

Figure 1 Location map including access points & extent of Scheduled area 8 Figure 2 Recorded Iron Age sites from North Somerset Historic Environment Record 9 Figure 3 Aerial photograph of Worlebury Camp, 1971 10 Figure 4 Worlebury, based on Dymond’s plan of 1880 showing the ramparts, ditches and pits. 11 Added to it are the approximate positions of some of the hut sites

Figure 5 Plans of walls/ramparts (Dymond & Tomkins, 1886) 12 Figure 6 Plans of walls/ramparts (Dymond & Tomkins, 1886) 12 Figure 7 Eastern ramparts after vegetation clearance showing 1930s path (January 2018) 12 Figure 8 Workmen constructing path (Weston Mercury & Somersetshire Herald (1939) 13 Figure 9 Extract from digital terrain model of Worlebury Camp 13 Figure 10 Drawing of excavated pit 14 Figure 11 Dense area of excavated storage pits in ‘The Glade’ 14 Figure 12 Drawing of excavated pit 14 Figure 13 Concentration of pits on DTM 14 Figure 14 1st edition Ordnance Survey map, 1880s 14 Figure 15 Locations of heritage threats and heritage crime 20 Figure 16 Heritage Threats: vegetation and trees 21 Figure 17 Pit engulfed by ivy, with roots of medium-sized tree enveloping side of pit 21 Figure 18 Trees and vegetation along southern rampart 21 Figure 19 Trees and vegetation along ramparts. Roots here are causing damage to the rampart 21 material

Figure 20 Damage caused by a tree throw 21 Figure 21 Glade after vegetation cut - January 2017 22 Figure 22 Glade after further removal of vegetation – January 2018 22 Figure 23 Pit cleared of brambles 22 Figure 24 Glade showing continued clearance of brambles, etc., resulting in re-establishment of 22 limestone grassland – Summer 2018

Figure 25 Recorded locations of erosion 23 Figure 26 Recorded locations of heritage crime 23 Figure 27 Removal of stones resulting in creation of modern cairn 24 Figure 28 Example of shelter created using rampart material on southern slopes 24 Figure 29 Example of shelter created using rampart material on southern slopes 24 Figure 30 Example of shelter/play-fort created using rampart material on eastern ramparts 24

Figure 31 Area of fly tipping on northern slopes 25 Figure 32 Large fire setting at top of Trinity Steps 25 Figure 33 Digital terrain model (DTM) of Worlebury Camp 36 Figure 34 Areas identified for felling 41

3 1. Introduction

Worlebury Camp is a large Iron Age hillfort located on a limestone promontory to the north of Weston- super-Mare. It sits at the western spur of Worlebury Hill covering an area of approximately 10 hectares, within the larger Weston Woods (130 hectares). It is afforded the highest protection for a heritage asset in England, as a Scheduled Monument (National Heritage List for England number: 1011260).

The land within which the hillfort sits is owned and managed by North Somerset Council.

The hillfort was planted with trees in the early 19th century and has been subject to deforestation and subsequent afforestation since this time.

Worlebury Camp was placed on Historic England’s Heritage at Risk Register in 2016, categorised as vulnerable, with the principal threats being trees and vegetation.

A number of initiatives have been undertaken by North Somerset Council to improve the hillfort and prevent damage through the removal of trees and vegetation clearance, as well as the creation of interpretation boards and better access to the monument. Now that the hillfort has been placed on the Heritage at Risk Register, North Somerset Council is even more committed to the preservation of this exceptional monument.

Working with the volunteers of the Worlebury Hillfort Group, we will begin this with the creation and implementation of this management plan, which sets out our objectives until 2025.

This document was subject to public consultation between 12th October and 9th November 2018, and all responses have been taken into consideration and included where feasible. We thank the local groups and residents for feeding into this.

4 2. Site Description 2.1 General information Parish: Weston-super-Mare

Local Planning Authority: North Somerset Council

Grid Reference: ST 312 624

Maps: OS 1:50000 sheet 182

2.1.1 Area 10.07 hectares (Compartment 8 of Weston Woods plus 7 remaining compartments = 140 hectares)

2.1.2 Tenure North Somerset Council: Bought by former Woodspring Council in 1937

2.1.3 Status Designated as Scheduled Ancient Monument in 1915 under Ancient Monuments Act 1913. Now protected as a Scheduled Monument under the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Areas Act (1979).

2.1.4 Sites of Conservation Interest (based on North Somerset Local Plan) Wildlife Site – number 581 – Worlebury Hill Local Nature Reserve – number 28 – Weston Woods

2.1.5 Access and pathways Pedestrian access only. Weston Woods, in which the hillfort sits, is afforded free public access all year round. Main access points are Camp Road, Trinity Road, the bridleway to the north, and Worlebury Hill Road. There is no vehicular access within the scheduled area.

Two public rights of way traverse the interior of the hillfort. One from the eastern end, at the access point from Worlebury Hill Road, to the westernmost access at Camp Steps, and the other crosses this perpendicular from the access on the bridleway on the northern edge, to Trinity Steps on the southern side. A bridleway runs from Toll Road and skirts the edge of the scheduled area on its northernmost limits. All access points are highlighted in figure 1.

2.1.6 Site use The site is used by a variety of visitors for walking (including dog walking), wildlife/plant interest and historical interest.

5 2.1.7 Designation details (extracted from the National Heritage List of England – see figure 1 for extent)

Name: Worlebury Camp: a large multivallate hillfort on Worlebury Hill

List entry Number: 1011260

Reasons for Designation Large multivallate hillforts are defined as fortified enclosures of between 5ha and 85ha in area, located on hills and defined by two or more lines of concentric earthworks set at intervals of up to 15m. They date to the Iron Age period, most having been constructed and used between the sixth century BC and the mid-first century AD. They are generally regarded as centres of permanent occupation, defended in response to increasing warfare, a reflection of the power struggle between competing elites. Earthworks usually consist of a rampart and ditch, although some only have ramparts. Access to the interior is generally provided by two entrances although examples with one and more than two have been noted. These may comprise a single gap in the rampart, inturned or offset ramparts, oblique approaches, guardrooms or outworks. Internal features generally include evidence for intensive occupation, often in the form of oval or circular houses. These display variations in size and are often clustered, for example, along streets. Four- and six-post structures, interpreted as raise granaries, also occur widely while few sites appear to contain evidence for temples. Other features associated with settlement include platforms, paved areas, pits, gullies, fence lines, hearths and ovens. Additional evidence, in the form of artefacts, suggests that industrial activity such as bronze- and iron-working as well as pottery manufacture occurred on many sites. Large multivallate hillforts are rate, with around 50 examples recorded nationally. These occur mostly in two concentrations, in Wessex and the Welsh Marches, although scattered examples occur elsewhere. In view of the rarity of large multivallate hillforts and their importance in understanding the nature of social organisation within the Iron Age period, all examples with surviving archaeological potential are believed to be of national importance.

The large multivallate hillfort on Worlebury Hill is an outstanding example of its class. It survives well and is known from excavations to contain archaeological and environmental information relating to the monument and the landscape in which it was constructed and later reused. This example is unusual in terms of its location as hillforts on this scale are rarely situated on coastal promontories. This hillfort is one of a number of well-preserved examples surviving in the area. Together, these will provide a detailed insight into Iron Age society in the area, its economy and the political and social structure of which it was part.

History

Details The monument includes a large multivallate hillfort on Worlebury Hill, a carboniferous limestone promontory oriented east to west and overlooking Weston Bay to the south west, Sand Bay to the north east and an area of Levels to the east. The hillfort, known and Worlebury Camp, occupies the spur of Worlebury Hill and has a level sub-rectangular interior with maximum dimensions of 690m from east to west and 200m from north to south. In 1900 Dymond recorded the presence of 93 pits within the interior of the hillfort. These were found to contain human and animal remains. Other finds including an Iron Age axehead, iron spearheads and the beaded rim of a Glastonbury style pot were recovered by Warre during his investigations conducted in the 1850s. Surrounding the enclosed area are steep natural slopes to the south west and west and cliffs with associated terracing to the north.

6 In the southern area, where the natural slopes are less steep, a single rampart defined the site. This included a stone built bank which survives up to 8m wide and c0.8m high. The topography to the east is almost level with the hillfort and in order to compensate for this a multivallate system of defences was developed. This included a multiple set of ramparts of curvilinear form, comprising three large stone-built banks with four smaller ramparts beyond. The inner bank is the largest and is 10m wide and c1.5m high. The six further banks become progressively smaller and very in size from 9m wide and c1.2m high in the west, to 2m wide and c0.5m high in the east. All seven banks have external ditches from which material was quarried during their construction. The two innermost examples are 15m wide and c1m deep, the remaining five become progressively smaller to the east; these range between 10m wide and 0.8m deep to 3m wide and c0.5m deep. The maximum width of the ramparts at the eastern end of the monument is 100m.

Neolithic flint arrowheads and flint axes recovered from the area suggest that the hilltop was occupied before the Iron Age. There is also a fragment of a rare cast bronze collar, dated to the Middle Bronze Age and which is likely to represent a German import. Following the period of Iron Age occupation and construction of the hillfort, further occupation of the hilltop can be attested during the Romano- British period. During investigations at the site by Warre in the 1850s, a hoard of Roman coins dating to AD 450 were recovered, along with a quantity of Roman pottery, glass beads and fragments of bronze. Excluded from the scheduling area are all fence posts and benches although the ground beneath all these features is included.

7 Map of Worlebury Camp Red line indicates extent of scheduled area

Access points – from bridleway

Access point – from Worlebury

Hill Road via Weston Woods

Access point – Camp Road steps

Access point – Trinity Steps

Figure 1: Location map including access points

8 3. Historical & Archaeological Background

Worlebury Camp was designated a Scheduled Monument in 1915, and was one of the earliest archaeological monuments to be added to the list under the Ancient Monuments Act 1913. At this time, it was under the ownership of the Smyth-Pigott family, one of the key players in the development of Weston-super-Mare as a seaside resort.

Worlebury Hill was subject to the Enclosure Act of 1810, and subsequently enclosed with a ‘hill wall’ (La Trobe Bateman, 1998). After the enclosure of the hill, John Smyth-Piggott began the process of planting trees to create a game reserve. Up until this time, Worlebury Hill has been an open limestone upland, protected by the sea and a steep cliff on the north, and by marshy lowland to the south and east.

The Revd Warre, who wrote of Worlebury Camp in 1851, laments the tree planting across the hillfort, and states that the trees ‘have grown so much, as to render it impossible to perceive the plan of the fortifications at one view’ (Warre, 1851).

Neolithic flint axes and arrowheads have been recovered from Worlebury Hill, suggesting that the hilltop was occupied before the Iron Age. There is tentative evidence that Worlebury Hill was occupied in the Bronze Age: a fragment of a cast bronze penannular collar is said to have been found near the hillfort (Lawson, 1976).

The hillfort on Worlebury Hill dominates the archaeological record for Weston-super-Mare for the Iron Age, because it is the most prominent feature in the town, and it probably played a central role in Iron Age society.

Other recorded Iron Age archaeology in the area includes several burials to the south of Worlebury Hill, which were mostly pit inhumations. Scatters of Iron Age pottery are also recorded within the wider landscape, as well as slingstones and domestic animal bone, most of which were deposited in pits on the southern slopes of the hill. Possible Iron Age cremations have also been recovered to the east of Worlebury Camp. These locations are illustrated in figure 2 below:

Known Iron Age sites

Figure 2: Recorded Iron Age sites from North Somerset Historic Environment Record

9 The hill has a long gentle south facing slope and plenty of flat land on the plateau top, which meant that it was well suited to agriculture. During the Iron Age, the hill became covered in small fields, traces of which can still be seen from the air (figure 2 – see purple star), masked and yet preserved by the Worlebury golf course (Evans, 1980).

The hillfort dates to the Iron Age, having been constructed and used between the 6th century BC and the mid-first century AD.

The tree cover hides most of the hillfort from aerial photography, and relatively few of the aerial reconnaissance sorties over Weston cover the area of the hillfort. For much of the second half of the 20th century, only glimpses of the ramparts could be seen in small clearings in the trees. Felling of trees occurred between the 1920s and 1950s for the war effort.

Figure 3: Aerial photograph of Worlebury Camp, 1971

3.1 Archaeological investigations of Worlebury Camp Worlebury Camp hillfort was first excavated in 1851 and 1852 by a group of antiquaries, including the Rev. Francis Warre, E. Martin Atkins, D. Tomkins and his son Revd H.G. Tomkins, Dr. Pring and Dr. Thurnam, prompted by damage caused to the outer earthworks when South Road was laid out. They cleared 93 pits and discovered finds of Iron Age and Romano-British date and the skeletons of 18 individuals (Warre, 1851). Atkins drew a plan of the hillfort, and several drawings and reports were published.

Thirty years later, in 1886, C.W. Dymond and H. Tomkins drew together all the previously published reports, re-excavated many of the pits, cut sections across the main walls and investigated the cross ditch (eds. Aston & Iles, 1987). He produced a new plan using Atkins’ work to mark in outer earthworks on the southern and western sides which, by this time, were lost to the gardens of Victorian houses (fig. 3). Dymond and Tomkins’ study of Worlebury in 1886, Worlebury: An Ancient Stronghold in the County of Somerset, was one of the first detailed examinations of a hillfort in England, with the report including accurate drawings of features on the site and finds made during their excavations, and also the investigations of Warre in the 1850s (eds. Aston & Iles, 1987).

Worlebury was probably a centre of permanent occupation, defended in response to increasing warfare - a reflection of the power struggle between competing elites. It is not clear how, why or when people stopped living here: it is unlikely that it was occupied long after Britain became part of the Roman empire in the mid-1st century AD (Evans, 1980).

10

Figure 4: Worlebury, based on Dymond’s plan of 1880 showing the ramparts, ditches and pits. Added to it are the approx imate positions of some of the hut sites

Evidence for activity in and around the hillfort during the Romano-British period has also been found in the form of a hoard of Roman coins dating to AD 450, glass beads and Roman pottery. A number of artefacts and burials dating to this period have also been found along the southern slopes of Worlebury Hill.

Rutter (1829) offers a suggestion that Worlebury Camp was reoccupied in the early medieval period, based on a Saxon chronicle of 998 recording that the Danes marched from Worlebury Camp to Biddisham.

Important features within the hillfort (discussed in detail in the following section) include the storage pits found mostly within the eastern extent of the interior of the monument. Some of the pits included human remains, and they showed evidence of violent deaths. Whilst it has been widely believed that these inhabitants met their untimely end at the hands of an attacking tribe during the Iron Age, or perhaps even as part of the Roman invasion of this area, it is possible that the bodies were placed in the pits in a ritual context.

3.2 Features of the hillfort The hillfort occupies approximately 10 hectares of the spur of Worlebury Hill, with maximum dimensions of 690m east to west and 200m north to south (Historic England Listing Description). Defences The fortifications of Worlebury Camp comprise a combination of both man-made and natural defences.

To the northern extent of the hillfort, natural slopes and cliffs formed part of the hillfort’s defences, and Dymond referred to a possible embankment along the northern boundary (Cotswold Archaeology, 2018).

To the south of the hillfort, the natural slope here is less steep, and so a single rampart, comprised of a single, stone built bank, was constructed. Along the southern rampart there are several platforms, which have been interpreted as ‘slinger platforms’, where it may have been possible that those defending the hillfort would have stood and used slings and small stones to fend off attackers.

At the eastern end of the hillfort lies a multivallate system of defences in the form of seven banks and ditches. The material for the banks/walls comprises the excavated material from the ditches. The ramparts become smaller in size as you move away from the interior of the hillfort, with the innermost bank measuring 10m wide and c1.5m high. The smaller banks and ditches are cut directly out of the

11 limestone bedrock. This was the only area that did not benefit from natural defensive slopes or cliffs, and as such, this defensive system was constructed. The maximum width of these ramparts is approximately 100m.

Figures 5 & 6: Plans of walls/ramparts (Dymond & Tomkins, 1886)

Dymond provides a detailed analysis of the construction of the ramparts, stating that they comprised a ‘massive wall comprised of loose stones, faced on both sides with dry walling’ (Dymond, 1886; Cotswold Archaeology, 2018).

Figure 7: Eastern ramparts after vegetation clearance showing 1930s path (January 2018)

Entrances Three entrances are recorded for Worlebury Camp hillfort. These include one on the southern ramparts, one to the north-east, and one to the west. The entrance on the southern side of the hillfort is surely contemporary with the monument, but it is possible that the other two are later in date.

It must be noted that the pathway through the eastern ramparts is of modern construction (fig.7). The modern entrance, located through the centre of the eastern multivallate defences was constructed in the late 1930s. The path was “cut through the encampment, while deep dips have been neatly bridged” (Anon, 1939). Figure 8 is an image from a newspaper article from May 1939 showing workmen from the council engaged in constructing a pathway from Worlebury Cottage to the Sky

12 Cottage approach. This was part of the Council’s scheme at the time to improve the site, which also included the clearance of vegetation.

Figure 8: Workmen constructing path (Weston Mercury & Somersetshire Herald (1939)

Dymond (1902) calls the southern entrance (fig.8) the ‘Grand Entrance’, and states that, “the gateway was bounded by a wall of very bold material … with a semi-circular wing or shoulder at its inner end, inclosing the northern flanking work” (rampart).

Southern (main) entrance

Figure 9: Extract from digital terrain model of Worlebury Camp (Cotswold Archaeology, 2018) Pits Many of the pits located within the interior of the hillfort were excavated by Warre in the 1850s, and he incorrectly interpreted them at the time as roundhouses. Dymond and Tomkins re-excavated some of the pits in 1886, and recorded a total of 93. This concentration suggests intensive occupation of the hillfort, and most are located within the eastern part of the interior.

13 It was believed that these pits were used for storage, and Warre’s excavations recovered the contents from the pits which included grain, pottery, and animal remains. Some of the pits also included human remains.

Figure 10: Drawing of excavated pit (Dymond, 1886) Figure 11: Dense area of excavated storage pits in ‘The Glade’

Figure 12: Drawing of excavated pit (Dymond, 1886) Figure 13: Concentration of pits on DTM (Cotswold Archaeology)

The pits range from 2m in diameter, to around 3.6m in diameter, with the average size being 3m, and are cut out of the bedrock. Some are lined with stone, and the larger pits even have steps leading down into them. It is likely that others would have been accessed by wooden or rope ladders. Hut circles The houses or huts where the people of Worlebury lived are unfortunately not visible today and were not recognised by the excavators. However, Cumberland’s plan of the hillfort made in 1805 indicates their survival in the western two-thirds of the hillfort, and the 1:500 Ordnance Survey map of 1885 records ‘Hut Circles’ (fig.12).

These hut circles were described by Rev Warre in 1851 as “neither granaries, nor tombs, nor permanent residences, but simply places of shelter in times of danger” (Dymond, 1902).

Figure 14: 1st edition Ordnance Survey map, 1880s

14 Dymond and Tomkins’ re-evaluation of Worlebury in 1902 states, “Mr. Warre speaks of the ‘circles’ (by which he means the ring-embankments surrounding the pits) as being 28 to 30 feet in diameter; and regards them as undoubtedly the foundations of ancient huts. Although traces of these embankments were then in existence, they must have been very slight, for, at the present time, nothing but a very small shallow bank is here and there to be seen”. It is possible that the larger storage pits were roofed, and the embankments are related to this.

There is also the presumption by Dymond that these hollows were misinterpreted by Warre and were actually mineral extraction pits relating to the post-medieval calamine industry known to have been located on Worlebury Hill. Further research into these potential hut circles is required.

15 4. Previous Management of Worlebury Camp Management plans have been in place for Weston Woods since 1998, and the hillfort has been identified as compartment 8 (of 8 compartments), with specific management identified for it. Limited resources have meant that the objectives of these management plans have not always been met.

Extracts relating to the archaeology and hillfort within Weston Woods from previous iterations of management plans are listed below. It is evident that vegetation and tree clearance has been a priority for many years. 4.1 Extracts from Weston Woods Management Plan (2004-2009) Concerns were raised in the original management plan of 1998 that trees were damaging the fabric of the site as well as obscuring it. A small area of trees was felled where damage to archaeology was occurring. This was a trial as a precursor to clear-felling the hillfort to protect and unveil the archaeology. Annual shrub and weed clearance is programmed in every winter. A5.4) Maintain the clear areas around the Hillfort - cut scrub in winter Review of management plan - Scrub clearance on the fort’s eastern ramparts has been ongoing. No other tree felling has taken place. A strategy was developed with North Somerset Council’s Biodiversity Officer with the objective to manage an area to the North of the hillfort to encourage limestone grassland vegetation and habitat. This appear to have been partially successful as calcareous grassland plants may be seen in the area, however; more intensive maintenance is required to achieve a thriving habitat.

4.2 Extracts from Weston Woods Management Plan (2010-2015) Concerns were raised in the original management plan of 1998 that trees were damaging the fabric of the site as well as obscuring it. A small area of trees was felled where damage to archaeology was occurring. Annual shrub and weed clearance is programmed in every winter.

Key management issues: Investigate threats to vulnerable archaeological areas

Criteria/aims Actions Measure Timetable Process A5.4) Maintain the A5.4.1) Cut scrub in All areas cut Annually Revenue/Volunteers/ clear areas around winter satisfactorily Ranger/Officer Time the hillfort A5.5) Investigate A5.5.1) Liaise with Inspect report 2012 Officer Time/ the need to qualified parties recommendations Revenue / Grant remove further trees and scrub from the hillfort A5.6) Improve A5.6.1) Reduce All areas cut and Annually Ranger/Grant limestone fertility of soil by cleared grassland area regular spring and satisfactorily autumn cutting and removal of cuttings

16 4.3 Extracts from Weston Woods Management Plan (2015-2025)

The following information describes the management proposals for the hillfort.

Maintain hillfort reasonably clear of woody vegetation. Indicator: the glade at the hillfort and the western ramparts are reasonably clear of significant vegetation 2010/11 was the last year that a twice yearly cut of the hillfort was possible. A reduction in available resources meant that conservation management contractors are on site once a year, clearing the limestone grassland area and half the hillfort. The ramparts are done every two years. Whilst a more intensive regime would be preferable, especially in trying to maintain the limestone grassland, no funds have been available. With regards to damage to the fabric of the Scheduled Monument from roots, significant woody species growth is removed, and the risk of other vegetation causing damage is low. From June 2016, a volunteer group is cutting vegetation in the glade.

Introduce interpretation signage Six interpretation boards were installed in 2010 on large boulders, at strategic locations throughout the woodland. These boards are generally in good condition. It was noted that the board which relates to the hillfort could be re-located to allow users of the all-access path to see it. It is currently located on a rough PROW footpath. No resources have been available to relocate the boulder.

Investigate the need to remove further trees and scrub from the hillfort Due to lack of officer time to investigate this, and means to fund tree works, the aspiration was abandoned.

Improve the limestone grassland at the hillfort Funds to improve the grassland area, over and above our annual cut, have not been available.

Objectives:

• Maintain and/or enhance the site’s prehistoric archaeology • Maintain the site’s prehistoric archaeology and limestone grassland remnants by cutting the glade and ramparts annually, subject to available funding/resource • To recognise and encourage further community involvement in the woodland through consultation, events and activities • Maintain hillfort glade and eastern ramparts reasonably clear of woody vegetation (to be monitored in the summer with a visual assessment)

17 5. Worlebury Hillfort Project

Worlebury Camp hillfort is one of the top 10 hillforts of its type, with only 50 known nationally. The evidence excavated during the 19th century investigations is still accessible yet under-researched, and therefore comprises large research value without having to undertake further destructive excavations on the site itself. Together with the excellent level of preservation, of both the physical monument and the artefactual and environmental evidence recovered from those early excavations, Worlebury Camp hillfort is one of the most important, and significant heritage assets, in North Somerset, and indeed the south-west region.

In recent times, there has been growing interest in the hillfort from the community, which culminated in discussions regarding improved management. Concerns were raised by a volunteer group working on the hillfort who reported vandalism in the form of a 6ft cairn, constructed from rubble from the hillfort’s ramparts.

A site visit was subsequently arranged in October 2016 with North Somerset Council’s archaeologist, the volunteers, North Somerset Council’s tree officer and Historic England’s Heritage at Risk Project Officer. The hillfort was thus placed on the Historic England ‘Heritage at Risk’ Register in 2017. Its condition was described as ‘generally unsatisfactory with major localised problems’, and its principal vulnerability is listed as ‘forestry’.

Lack of resources had prevented previous archaeological involvement, but in 2017 North Somerset Council were successful in the bid for a grant of £10,000 from the Heritage Lottery Fund (HLF) to undertake an archaeological condition survey of the hillfort, which would inform better management of the monument.

The outcomes of the grant are:

1) Appoint a consultant to undertake an archaeological condition survey of the hillfort and provide an evaluation of its condition to inform appropriate future management of the monument 2) Produce a management plan for the site 3) Volunteers to deliver a programme of guided walks to the site for the local school and community groups

In December 2017, Cotswold Archaeology were commissioned to undertake the survey, which was carried out between January and March 2018. Its purpose was to provide comprehensive information on the current form and survival of the hillfort; areas of damage, threats and risks to the monument, meeting the first outcome of the HLF grant, and to inform the second outcome.

Part of the commission was to produce a topographic survey or Digital Terrain Model (DTM) of the entire scheduled area.

The resulting report included a programme of documentary research, using information from the North Somerset Historic Environment Record (HER) data, Somerset Record Office, Historic England’s Aerial Photographic Research Unit, antiquarian reports on Worlebury Camp, and information from local archaeological societies and volunteer groups.

18 5.1 Condition Survey Methodology The survey was formed of two parts: topographical survey and walkover condition survey. Both were undertaken in January 2018.

The results of the surveys have been provided by Cotswold Archaeology to North Somerset Council as digital GIS (geographical information systems) data, which will allow for queries and viewing of images. These data and images have helped form the basis of this management plan. 5.2 Topographical Survey / Digital Terrain Model (DTM) The topographical survey was carried out in January 2018 using a handheld laser scanner, with data collected across the full extent of the scheduled area. Surveyors from Cotswold Archaeology were able to record 43,200 points per second, with an anticipated accuracy of 2cm. The results of the digital terrain model can be found in figure 31.

5.3 Condition survey The walkover condition survey was undertaken at the same time the digital terrain model data was being collected. It was informed by the documentary research undertaken by Cotswold Archaeology, and recorded all locations of heritage threats and risks.

The results from the condition survey can be found in more detail in Section 6 – Management Issues. The section utilises all recorded data from the condition survey and discusses specific issues in further detail.

5.4 Justification for the project Worlebury Camp hillfort is an outstanding example of its type and, as such, should be rightfully celebrated and enjoyed by all.

The overall aim of this project is to show local residents and visitors alike that Weston-super-Mare has something extra to offer – a real sense of history and depth of time.

The aims within this management plan will ensure that this exemplary hillfort is uncovered, helping to reveal its secrets, lost for almost two hundred years under extensive tree and vegetation growth.

We aim to employ appropriate management to maintain the hillfort, and remove risks and threats to the monument which will ensure its preservation for future generations. By addressing the threats to the hillfort, and implementing management objectives, we intend to remove the hillfort from Historic England’s Heritage at Risk Register.

19 6. Management issues

6.1 Overview In December 2017, North Somerset Council was awarded £10,000 from the Heritage Lottery Fund to commission an archaeological survey of the hillfort.

The main purpose of the condition survey undertaken by Cotswold Archaeology in early 2018 was to identify and record threats and risks to the hillfort, which will inform the long-term management of the monument. The condition survey report categorised the findings as follows:

• Heritage threats: forestry & scrub growth, erosion • Heritage crime: removal of objects, littering and fire settings

Below is a map of all recorded threats to the hillfort, along with instances of heritage crime.

Figure 15: Locations of heritage threats and heritage crime

6.2 Heritage Threats Heritage threats comprise non-intentional damage to the hillfort i.e. as a result of erosion, collapse and animal burrowing, as well as accidental damage resulting from forestry and visitor erosion. 6.2.1 Forestry and scrub growth The condition survey stated, “forestry comprises the most significant threat to Worlebury Camp, as recorded on the heritage at risk record produced by Historic England” (Cotswold Archaeology, 2018). The threat level of forestry to the monument is largely recorded as severe, and the “ongoing erosion by mature trees of key features of the monument is notable”. Three of the main risks regarding forestry include: • tree root erosion of features including pits and ramparts • erosion caused by tree collapse or leaning trees • collapse of trees across formal footpaths

20 The main areas impacted on by trees are the ramparts and ditches, the three entrances, and the central (Glade) area and pits.

Figure 16: Heritage Threats: vegetation and trees

Damage to the hillfort from trees ranges from slight to severe, with examples including fallen trees, trees on the edges of pits, root disturbance and leaning trees. Those trees that are leaning or have already fallen cause damage to the hillfort by loosening and uprooting stones, thus resulting in collapse of ramparts and pits.

Images of threats from trees and vegetation growth are shown below:

Figure 17: Pit engulfed by ivy, with roots of medium- sized tree enveloping side of pit Figure 18: Trees and vegetation along southern rampart

Figure 19: Trees and vegetation along ramparts. Roots here are causing damage to the rampart material Figure 20: Damage caused by a tree throw

21 Extensive areas of scrub and other plant growth are notable across the monument, and present long- term erosion problems. These areas of extensive growth also impede access to the hillfort.

Damage to the hillfort from scrub growth is less severe, compared to the tree cover, as the roots are generally shallower.

The area known ass ‘The Glade’ was clear-felled by North Somerset Council approximately 15 years ago, and has been managed through annual clearance. However, vegetation clearance in this area has undertaken by the volunteers of the Worlebury Hillfort Group since June 2016. The volunteers are on site weekly, and the images below show the amazing achievements of the group, and limestone grassland is being re-established in this area thanks to their efforts.

Figure 22: Glade after further removal of vegetation Figure 21: Glade after vegetation cut - January 2017 – January 2018

Figure 24: Glade showing continued clearance of Figure 23: Pit cleared of brambles (Worlebury brambles, etc., resulting in re-establishment of

Hillfort Group, August 2018) limestone grassland – Summer 2018

Clearance of vegetation will be easier through the clear-felling of trees, due to improved access to previously inaccessible areas. This will also allow for the re-establishment of limestone grassland across the majority of the interior of the hillfort.

22 6.2.2 Erosion Erosion is defined in the condition survey as ‘unofficial footpaths’. These are located where visitors stray from more formal routes.

Figure 25: Recorded locations of erosion

Little evidence was identified for animal burrowing, and is thus not considered to be a significant issue.

6.3 Heritage Crime Heritage crime is deemed to comprise ‘wilful damage to the scheduled monument, i.e. as a result of fire starting, vandalism and dumping’. Most recorded sites of heritage crime were located in the southern half of the monument, particularly along the southern rampart.

Figure 26: Recorded locations of heritage crime

23 6.3.1 Removal of objects Stones that have been moved from their original locations and creation of features such as the cairn in fig.27 and shelters/play-forts in figs. 28, 29 & 30 are regarded as heritage crime. The most significant identified instance of this form of heritage crime is located at the original entrance to the hillfort, at the top of the southern ramparts, and was defined in the condition survey as ‘severe damage’. This feature sits almost 2 metres high and 4m in diameter. The main concern with this type of damage to the hillfort is that it causes irreparable damage to the monument’s form and structure.

Figure 27: Movement of stones resulting in creation of modern cairn

Other areas of heritage crime through removal of stones include shelters and play-forts, and these are mostly found along the southern ramparts, and also within the eastern rampart complex.

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

Figure 28: Example of shelter created using rampart Figure 29: Example of shelter created using material on southern slopes rampart material on southern slopes

Figure 30: Example of shelter/play-fort created using rampart material on eastern ramparts 24 6.3.2 Littering and fire settings Most areas of littering and fly tipping are located away from main public access routes. 19 instances of extensive fly tipping were recorded, and 34 instances of littering.

Whilst the fly-tipping and littering have limited physical effects on the scheduled monument, they severely detract from the enjoyment and impact on experience of the hillfort.

Figure 31: Area of fly tipping on northern slopes Figure 32: Large fire setting at top of Trinity Steps

Fire settings recorded in the condition survey were largely defined as causing ‘moderate damage’, and this was one of the most common instances of heritage crime recorded on the hillfort. 18 fire settings were identified during the condition survey. The majority of recorded fire settings are located along the southern ramparts, and incorporated removal of stone from the monument in order to create them.

The removal of stones leads to irreparable damage to the monument. As well as this physical effect, it impacts on the way in which visitors to the site experience the hillfort.

25 7. Site management - aims and objectives

Our vision:

Worlebury Camp is a special place.

We will ensure its preservation, reveal its features, widen its audience, and successfully maintain the site.

Having drawn on the information from our own knowledge and experience of managing the site, as well as the condition survey report, and feedback from volunteers and other stakeholders, the following aims and objectives have been agreed:

Objective 1: Preserve the hillfort through monitoring and maintenance of archaeological features, and removal of risk to archaeological fabric including trees and vegetation

Objective 2: Increase awareness of the archaeological and historical importance of the site for the future, and to improve understanding and interpretation of the hillfort

Objective 3: To develop the full recreational potential of Worlebury Camp hillfort, without loss to its important character and biodiversity

Objective 4: To involve the local community as practicably possible in the management of the hillfort

Objective 5: To provide volunteering opportunities at different levels

Objective 6: To improve access to, and within the hillfort

Objective 7: Continue to engage with local schools; further incorporate the archaeological significance and management of this site into their teaching, and to establish better connections with Weston Museum, and improve upon currently available information

Objective 8: Restore the limestone grassland habitat that once flourished on Worlebury Hill

Objective 9: Improve links with Weston town centre

Objective 10: Removal from Historic England’s Heritage at Risk register

26 8. Work Plan This work plan will form part of a Stage 2 Heritage Lottery Fund bid. Funding to deliver each of the objectives below will inform that bid.

All parties involved in work as part of this management plan will be made aware of the Scheduled status of the hillfort, the monument’s boundaries and their own responsibilities.

Objective Detail Method Measure Timing / Date Who Objective 1: Preserve hillfort through monitoring and maintenance of archaeological features, and removal of risk to archaeological fabric through removal of trees and vegetation Removal of trees – see below for details (Appendix 2 for map) 1.1 Removal of trees Prior to the removal of any All works are to be undertaken in Removal of trees Winter Appointed within interior of vegetation or trees, an ecological accordance with Scheduled 2019/2020 contractor hillfort survey will be commissioned to Monument Consent & felling ensure key species and habitats licence – in accordance with felling are not lost, and hopefully plan (Appendix 2). Trees will be provide recommendations for the felled as near as possible flush with restoration of the limestone the ground grassland. 1.2 Removal of trees Clear-fell all trees except those All works are to be undertaken in Removal of trees Winter Appointed along western and highlighted through tree survey accordance with Scheduled Important features 2019/2020 contractor southern ramparts Monument Consent & felling such as ramparts licence - in accordance with felling are clearly visible plan. Trees will be felled as near as possible flush with the ground 1.3 Thinning of trees Felled trees to be identified in All works are to be undertaken in Removal of trees Winter Appointed along north- method statement submitted for accordance with Scheduled Important features 2019/2020 contractor western and felling licence. Retain Whitebeam Monument Consent & felling such as ramparts northern extents (Sorbus aria) licence - in accordance with felling are clearly visible of scheduled area plan. Trees will be felled as near as (except key possible flush with the ground specimens)

27 Objective Detail Method Measure Timing / Date Who 1.4 Removal of trees at Clear-fell all trees except those All works are to be undertaken in Removal of trees Winter Appointed contractor eastern ramparts highlighted through tree accordance with Scheduled 2019/2020 and entrance survey Monument Consent & felling licence. Trees will be felled as near as possible flush with the ground 1.5 Vegetation Initial clearance of north- Through use of brushcutters, All areas cut Annually NSC contractor / clearance eastern, eastern and southern strimmers, mowers, satisfactorily, and volunteers ramparts to be undertaken by pesticide/herbicide application, vegetation removed NSC contractors. Volunteers to small tree removal Important features maintain interior of hillfort such as pits and ramparts are clearly visible 1.6 Replacement tree Seek to plant new woodland of Identify suitable sites, seek funding, Replanting of trees TBC NSC planting similar size, if locations and and plant as per Forestry funds allow Commission guidelines 1.7 Management of Annual clearance of north- Through use of brushcutters, All areas cut Bi-annually by NSC / NSC contractor / vegetation regrowth eastern, eastern and southern strimmers, mowers, satisfactorily, and contractors / volunteers ramparts undertaken by NSC pesticide/herbicide application, vegetation removed. ongoing for contractors. Volunteers to small tree removal Important features volunteers maintain interior of hillfort such as pits and Investigate grazing to control ramparts are clearly vegetation regrowth and introduce visible if viable

Management of seedbanks – limestone grassland 1.8 Prevent creation of Features created from rampart Dismantle features in line with Condition of Ongoing NSC / volunteers / cairns and play-forts material method statement accepted as part Scheduled Civic Society of Scheduled Monument Consent Monument Consent for general maintenance of hillfort. to be discharged /

Educate visitors of impact of Once features are creating features. dismantled, no further structures created / 28 Signage to be erected to inform Signage to be visitors of impact of damage installed Objective Detail Method Measure Timing / Date Who 1.9 Tackling illegal fires Fire settings utilise stones Remove all fire settings under 5 Eradication of fire Ongoing Volunteers from the hillfort itself, and year Scheduled Monument Consent settings within cause damage to the (in line with method statement) scheduled area

underlying archaeology Improve signage - notifying visitors of places within Weston Woods where they can use barbeques, etc. (see objective 2) Objective 2: Increase awareness of the archaeological and historical importance of the site for the future, and to improve understanding and interpretation of the hillfort 2.1 Publicise Raise awareness through Local media and social media / Increased visitor Summer 2019 NSC in collaboration importance and publicity campaigns North Somerset Life magazine numbers to (first survey) interested significance of monument, prior to parties/volunteers hillfort Regular project updates to be measured by survey felling, then displayed in Weston Museum annually 2.2 Research Considerable potential for See appendix 1 for details of Outcomes of each Beginning Historic England / NSC gaining new knowledge about current & potential research research project / Winter / other researchers the archaeology of the hillfort projects (including proposed improved knowledge 2018/2019 excavation) of monument 2.3 Information leaflets Create new leaflets for visitors Creation of new leaflets with up to Leaflets/maps Summer 2020 NSC / volunteers / to hillfort date information on hillfort, available through Weston Museum / utilising survey data and Museum and Tourist Civic Society / WSM information gleaned from research Information Centre, Town Council / Weston projects and other outlets, Archaeology Society including online

2.4 Information for Work with local schools and Create map of hillfort for children / Production of End 2021 NSC archaeologist / younger visitors / Young Archaeologists’ Club to leaflet ‘for children, by children’ information leaflet / schools / Historic schools produce information map England / Weston Museum / YAC

29 Objective Detail Method Measure Timing / Date Who 2.5 Improved maps of Creation of new maps with up Leaflets/maps made available Creation of maps Summer 2020 NSC with input from hillfort to date information on hillfort, through Museum and Tourist volunteers / Weston utilising survey data and Information Centre, and other Museum / Civic Society information gleaned from outlets, as well as downloadable / WSM Town Council / research projects PDF versions Weston Archaeology Society / local schools 2.6 Popular publication Produce publication for wider Use results of research projects and Creation of popular End 2022 NSC archaeologist with dissemination antiquarian investigations to publication input from volunteers provide the definitive story of & interested parties / Worlebury Camp Historic England 2.7 Improve signage / Significantly improve signage Utilise research into site to provide Creation and Temporary North Somerset interpretation and interpretation boards at up to date interpretation of hillfort delivery of signage to be Council / Weston- access points to hillfort, once and develop an interpretation interpretation put in place super-Mare Town we have a better strategy that includes: strategy by end 2019 Council / Historic

understanding of the Provide temporary signage – Civic Revised England / interested monument carried out Society to provide funding New signage interpretation parties (incl. Civic through research as part of installed at access boards and Society) this project points Siting of interpretation board at other signage eastern entrance to ensure visible Revised to be in place to disabled visitors (where paths interpretation by start of meet) boards 2021 2.8 Document work Creation of project diary Blog / video diary, possibly to Creation of project End 2023 NSC / volunteers undertaken include drone footage at different diary throughout project stages

2.9 Improve awareness Regular articles in local media Publicity regarding illegal removal Reduction of Ongoing North Somerset of impact of / NS Life magazine, etc. to of stones, fire settings, etc. unlawful activity Council vandalism to hillfort highlight impact on archaeology

30 Objective Detail Method Measure Timing / Date Who Objective 3: To develop the full recreational potential of Worlebury Camp hillfort, without loss to its important character and biodiversity 3.1 Removal of trees Allowing local residents and See objectives 1 and 9 (and - - - and vegetation / visitors to fully engage with appendix 2) restore limestone the features of the hillfort. grassland Views will be opened up across Weston Bay and Sand Bay, providing a new destination for visitors to Weston 3.2 Improve waste Provide more litter bins and Provision of additional waste Installation of more End 2021 NSC / Weston Town facilities, and dog waste bins at access facilities litter and dog waste Council improve points bins Encourage visitors through signage information relating to take their litter home Less littering to their locations 3.3 Improve access and See objectives 2 and 6 - - - - signage 3.4 Tackle antisocial Educate visitors to the Work with NSC Community Eradication of anti- Ongoing NSC / Avon & behaviour and monument of the impact on Response, Avon & Somerset Police, social behaviour and Somerset Police / local vandalism archaeology and local community vandalism community

Removal of trees will go some way to eradicating antisocial behaviour 3.5 Tackle illegal fires Fire settings utilise stones Remove all fire settings under 5 Eradication of fire Ongoing Volunteers from the hillfort itself, and year Scheduled Monument Consent settings within cause damage to the (in line with method statement) scheduled area

underlying archaeology Improve signage - notifying visitors of places within Weston Woods where they can use barbeques, etc. (see objective 2) Objective 4: To involve the local community as fully practicable possible in the management of the hillfort 4.1 Provide Offer public consultation on Incorporate suggestions into Incorporation of Regular NSC opportunities to revisions of management plan management plan revisions suggestions into stakeholder meetings to 31 offer suggestions on management plan review management of site revisions progress

Objective Detail Method Measure Timing / Date Who 4.2 Creation of Establish management Management committee to feed Creation of Summer 2019 To include NSC, Civic management committee with into management of site management Society, hillfort committee representatives of stakeholder committee volunteers, (potential Trust) groups Archaeological Society, Weston Museum, etc. 4.3 Forest Schools Liaise with Forest Schools re Projects around the natural Involvement of Ongoing NSC / local schools / educational opportunities environment and history/ Forest Schools in Forest Schools archaeology projects 4.4 Events and tours of Run annual walk/guided tour Work with local groups and Annual tours of Annually NSC archaeologist / hillfort of hillfort for Festival of volunteers to run events about and hillfort, plus ad hoc volunteers / Weston Archaeology at the hillfort events Museum / Weston Archaeological Society Offer opportunities for other / Historic England events such as Heritage Schools Objective 5: To provide volunteering opportunities at different levels 5.1 Continue to work Volunteer work currently In line with method statements and Removal of Ongoing NSC / volunteers with existing includes removal of risk assessments vegetation / volunteers vegetation, etc. dismantling of features 5.2 Include volunteering Analytical survey of hillfort Training day – survey techniques Completion of Winter 2018 / Historic England / NSC element in research analytical survey 2019 archaeologist / projects which includes volunteers volunteering element 5.3 Encourage local Incorporate elements of Promotion of opportunities through Delivery of research Ongoing NSC archaeologist to community to community engagement in local press & social media, etc. projects with lead become involved research projects volunteer aspect

32 with research projects Objective Detail Method Measure Timing / Date Who Objective 6: To improve access to, and within the hillfort 6.1 Footpaths PROW that crosses the hillfort Reinstate footpath to improve Improved footpaths/ Spring / NSC / appointed is in bad state of repair – accessibility and prevent further access Summer 2021 contractors / Historic severe erosion resulting in erosion England protruding rocks and tree roots, causing potential risk to Method to be agreed with Historic visitors England 6.2 Improve site access Trinity Steps are in a poor Maintenance of Improved access to End 2021 NSC / appointed state of repair steps/access/establishment of the monument via contractors / suitable surfacing Trinity Steps and volunteers Reinstate Victorian path along Victorian path southern rampart (next to wall) 6.3 Remote access to Enabling people to experience Creation of short film/tour to be Short film to be Commence NSC / interested hillfort the hillfort that aren’t able to displayed on Know Your Place created 2019 parties / Weston physically visit website / museum website. College Blog to be published Project blog on Discover North Somerset website Objective 7: Continue to engage with local schools; further incorporate the archaeological significance and management of this site into their teaching, and to establish better connections with Weston Museum, and improve upon currently available information 7.1 Heritage Schools Run event for local schools Liaise with Historic England’s Running event Summer 2019 NSC archaeologist / events showcasing Iron Age crafts / Heritage Schools Officer Historic England / local tours of hillfort schools 7.2 Projects within Incorporate hillfort project Liaise with local schools, working on Links with local Ongoing NSC archaeologist / schools into curriculum of local projects incorporating variety of schools / outputs local schools primary schools (Stone Age to aspects of hillfort/project from projects Iron Age)

33 Objective Detail Method Measure Timing / Date Who Objective 8: Restore the limestone grassland habitat that once flourished on Worlebury Hill See Objective 1 relating to tree and vegetation removal 8.1 Restoration of Through removal of scrub Reduce fertility of soil All areas cut and Ongoing NSC / NSC contractor / limestone grassland growth by regular spring and autumn cleared volunteers cutting and removal of cuttings satisfactorily 8.2 Management and Ongoing maintenance will Options such as grazing and/or Appropriate Ongoing NSC / NSC contractor / maintenance of prevent scrub regrowth, and mechanical methods to be fully methods employed volunteers limestone grassland encourage the limestone investigated to encourage grassland to become re- limestone grassland established Carry out annual ecological survey Improved species Annual diversity identified Objective 9: Improve links with Weston Town Centre

9.1 Make site more Installation of signage for Create better links from town Installation of NSC / Civic Society / End 2021 visible to residents hillfort within town centre and centre of Weston and other signage for hillfort WSM Town Council /

and visitors to seafront surrounding areas to hillfort within town centre / Tourist Board

Weston-super-Mare on seafront

Open up views to and from hillfort Increased foot traffic Removal of trees at hillfort and Winter 2019 / Museum 2020

Removal of trees 9.2 Improve links with Present information on Volunteers to provide updates to Information Spring 2019 Volunteers / NSC Weston Museum community display board NSC archaeologist who will update available on hillfort archaeologist /

Work with Young information board project progress Museum / YAC Archaeologists’ Club Ongoing Research undertaken as part of Improve information provided wider projects can feed into Ongoing by Weston Museum information available in museum

34 Objective Detail Method Measure Timing / Date Who Objective 10: Removal from Historic England’s Heritage at Risk register 10.1 Removal of trees Forestry is the principal threat Removal of trees and vegetation Removal of Winter 2019 / NSC / Historic England and vegetation to this hillfort Worlebury Camp 2020 & from Heritage at Risk ongoing register 10.2 Remove features of See objectives 1, 2 & 3 - - - - vandalism

35 Figure 33: Digital Terrain Model of Worlebury Camp (Cotswold Archaeology, 2018)

36 References Anon (1939) ‘Improving Weston’s Historic Treasure – Approach to Worlebury now made easy by flights of steps’, Weston Mercury and Somersetshire Herald, Weston-super-Mare, 20 May.

Aston, M & Iles, R (1987) The Archaeology of Avon: A review from the Neolithic to the Middle Ages. Avon County Council.

Cotswold Archaeology (2018) Worlebury Camp Hillfort, North Somerset: Archaeological Condition Survey (unpublished)

Dymond, C W & Tomkins, H G (1886) Worlebury Camp: An Ancient Stronghold in the County of Somerset. Bristol. (Printed by the authors)

Evans, J, 1980: Worlebury: The Story of the Iron Age Hill-fort at Weston-super-Mare. Weston-super- Mare. Woodspring Museum.

Historic England (2018) Worlebury Camp: a multivallate hillfort on Worlebury Hill https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1011260

Historic England (2015) Guidance on trees & scheduled monuments

Lawson A J (1976) An imported bronze collar from Somerset. Proceedings of the Somerset Archaeology and Natural History Society 82: 103

La Trobe-Bateman, E. (1998) Weston-super-Mare Extensive Urban Survey

Moore, B (2006) Worlebury: The Iron Age Hill Fort at Weston-super-Mare. Unpublished document.

North Somerset Council (2003) Weston Woods Management Plan 2004-2009.

North Somerset Council (2009) Weston Woods Management Plan 2010-2015.

North Somerset Council (2014) Weston Woods Management Plan 2015-2025.

Rutter, J (1829) Delineations of the north-western division of the county of Somerset, and of its antediluvian bone caverns, with a geological sketch of the district. Oxford. Oxford University.

37 Glossary

Antiquaries Antiquarians studied history with particular attention to ancient artefacts and manuscripts, as well as historical sites.

Cairn A man-made pile or stack of stones, often erected as modern landmarks. Historically they were used as burial mound (with internal chambers).

Digital Terrain Model Also known as Digital Elevation Modelling, Digital Terrain (DTM) Modelling (DTM) allows the visualisation of the surface of monuments and archaeological features.

Geographical Information A system designed to capture, store, manipulate, analyse, manage and System (GIS) present spatial or geographic data.

Multivallate Surrounded by two or more ramparts forming multiple lines of defence

Promontory A point of high land that juts out into the sea; a headland.

Rampart A fortification consisting of a wall or embankment; a means of defence or protection.

Topographical survey An accurate depiction of a site (property, area of land, defined boundary) which is scaled and detailed according to the spatial considerations and is the summary of the on-site data capture processes.

38 Appendix 1 – Research potential / projects

Research project Details Timing Undertaken by Ancient DNA – Human Analysis of human remains In progress Harvard University Genome project Taphonomic analysis Isotope analysis of human Richard Madgwick - of artefacts from remains, and mortuary End 2020 Cardiff University Worlebury practices Detailed analytical survey Winter Analytical survey Historic England of hillfort 2019/2020 Community Investigations of features excavation led by NSC Excavation within and around hillfort Summer 2020 archaeologist and including pits/hut circles Historic England NSC archaeologist to Radiocarbon dating from lead / Weston Radiocarbon (C14) human remains and Museum / South West End 2020 dating organic material recovered Heritage Trust / from pits Historic England / specialists NSC archaeologist to Examination of pottery lead / Weston Pottery residue vessels recovered from Museum / South West End 2021 analysis Warre & Dymond Heritage Trust / excavations in 19th century Historic England / specialists Beckett Primary School, plus other Various projects TBC Ongoing academies in Weston & NSC archaeologist Young Archaeologist’s Club (Weston Various projects TBC Ongoing Museum & NSC archaeologist)

39 Appendix 2 – Removal of trees and vegetation (including restoration of limestone grassland)

All works should only be undertaken when weather and ground conditions are suitable (i.e. the ground surface must not be broken or disturbed).

Due notice of archaeological earthworks or other historical features should be taken when felling larger trees and boughs, and measures should be taken to ensure that damage is not caused by falling timber.

Mechanically assisted removal of timber (winching, hauling etc.) should only be undertaken where such operations will not affect the ground surface. Where there is risk of damage occurring, brash mats should be used, especially on breaks of slopes.

Vehicles should not be taken onto or across a monument when ground conditions are unsuitable (i.e. if rutting occurs works should cease).

Felled materials should be disposed of off-site where possible and should not be burnt on site without permission from Historic England. In some cases, chippings may be spread over the site if agreed in advance with Historic England.

Details from Charlotte Russell, Heritage at Risk Project Officer – South West (Historic England)

40 Areas identified for felling

CLEAR FELL (EXCEPT IDENTIFIED SPECIES TO RETAIN)

THE GLADE (ALREADY CLEARFELLED)

THINNING (EXCEPT IDENTIFIED SPECIES TO RETAIN)

CLEAR FELL & REPLANT WITH UNDERSTORY PLANTING & GRADE STORY

CLEAR FELL – EASTERN/SOUTHERN RAMPARTS – (EXCEPT IDENTIFIED SPECIES TO RETAIN) - HIGH ARCHAEOLOGICAL SENSITIVITY

Figure 34: Areas identified for felling

41 Appendix 3 – Condition Survey Report 2018

42