Worlebury Camp Hillfort
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Conservation of Architectural Ancient Monuments in Scotland Guidance on Principles
CONSERVING THE UNDERWATER HERITAGE HERITAGE POLICY ..Safeguarding the Built Heritage The Conservation of Architectural Ancient Monuments in Scotland Guidance on Principles Richard Fawcett i THE CONSERVATION OF ARCHITECTURAL ANCIENT MONUMENTS IN SCOTLAND The Conservation of Architectural Ancient Monuments in Scotland Guidance on Principles Published by Historic Scotland Longmore House Salisbury Place Edinburgh EH9 1SH © Historic Scotland 2001 ISBN ii THE CONSERVATION OF ARCHITECTURAL ANCIENT MONUMENTS IN SCOTLAND CONTENTS Foreword page 1 Acknowledgements page 2 1. Introduction page 3 2. General principles of conservation page 7 3. Treatment of masonry walls page 10 4. Treatment of carved and moulded stonework page 20 5. Treatment of mortar page 25 6. Treatment of harling and wall renders page 27 7. Treatment of plasterwork page 29 8. Treatment of timberwork page 31 9. Treatment of floors and paving page 35 10. Treatment of concrete page 37 11. Treatment of historic painted decoration page 38 12. Treatment of earthworks associated with architectural monuments page 41 13. Treatment of vegetation at monuments page 44 14. Below-ground archaeology page 49 15. New buildings and developments at or near monuments page 50 16. Restoration of monuments for re-use page 51 17. Recording works at monuments page 57 Bibliography page 58 List of useful addresses page 61 iii THE CONSERVATION OF ARCHITECTURAL ANCIENT MONUMENTS IN SCOTLAND iv THE CONSERVATION OF ARCHITECTURAL ANCIENT MONUMENTS IN SCOTLAND FOREWORD Scotland is an old country, and is fortunate in having the remains of large numbers of buildings that, considered together, provide us with the most tangible and illuminating insights into our past. -
Setting of Historic Assets in Wales
Setting of Historic Assets in Wales May 2017 MANAGING 01 Setting of Historic Assets in Wales Statement of Purpose Setting of Historic Assets in Wales explains what setting is, how it contributes to the significance of a historic asset and why it is important. Setting of Historic Assets in Wales also outlines the principles used to assess the potential impact of development or land management proposals within the settings of World Heritage Sites, ancient monuments (scheduled and unscheduled), listed buildings, registered historic parks and gardens, and conservation areas. These principles, however, are equally applicable to all individual historic assets, irrespective of their designation. The guidance is not intended to cover the setting of the historic environment at a landscape scale. This is considered by separate guidance.1 This best-practice guidance is aimed at developers, owners, occupiers and agents, who should use it to inform management plans and proposals for change which may have an impact on the significance of a historic asset and its setting. It should also help them to take account of Cadw’s Conservation Principles for the Sustainable Management of the Historic Environment in Wales (Conservation Principles) to achieve high- quality sensitive change.2 Decision-making authorities and their advisers should also use this guidance alongside Planning Policy Wales,3 Technical Advice Note 24: The Historic Environment,4 Conservation Principles and other best-practice guidance to inform local policies and when considering individual applications for planning permission and listed building, scheduled monument and conservation area consent, including pre-application discussions. Welsh Government Historic Environment Service (Cadw) Plas Carew Unit 5/7 Cefn Coed Parc Nantgarw Cardiff CF15 7QQ Telephone: 03000 256000 Email: [email protected] First published by Cadw in 2017 Digital ISBN 978 1 4734 8700 0 © Crown Copyright 2017, Welsh Government, Cadw, except where specified. -
Whitestaunton Manor House Whitestaunton Somerset
Whitestaunton Manor House, Whitestaunton, Somerset An Archaeological Evaluation and an Assessment of the Results Ref: 52568.12 Wessex Archaeology May 2004 WHITESTAUNTON MANOR HOUSE WHITESTAUNTON SOMERSET AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVALUATION AND AN ASSESSMENT OF THE RESULTS Document Ref. 52568.12 May 2004 Prepared for: Videotext Communications Ltd 49 Goldhawk Road LONDON SW1 8QP By: Wessex Archaeology Portway House Old Sarum Park SALISBURY Wiltshire SP4 6EB © Copyright The Trust for Wessex Archaeology Limited 2004, all rights reserved The Trust for Wessex Archaeology Limited, Registered Charity No. 287786 1 WHITESTAUNTON MANOR HOUSE WHITESTAUNTON SOMERSET AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVALUATION AND AN ASSESSMENT OF THE RESULTS Contents Summary.................................................................................................................. 5 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................. 6 1 BACKGROUND........................................................................................... 7 1.1 Site location....................................................................................................7 1.2 Geology and topography................................................................................ 7 1.3 Previous archaeological work........................................................................ 8 2 METHODS.................................................................................................. 10 2.1 Introduction................................................................................................. -
Sustainability Appraisal Scoping Report
North Somerset Local Plan 2036 Sustainability Appraisal Scoping Report Consultation Version September 2018 Contents Page Non-Technical Summary 4 1. Introduction 8 The SA Process: Task A1 2. The requirements of other plans, 16 programmes and policies Task A2 3. Baseline information and assessment 18 Task A3 4. Key sustainability issues and the North 40 Somerset Local Plan Task A4 5. The Sustainability Appraisal Framework: 48 objectives and indicators 6. Other Assessments Linked to the SA 67 Process 7. Next Stages and Methodology for the SA 69 Appendix A: Review of Plans, Programmes and Policies 73 Maps: 1. North Somerset administrative area 18 2. Green Belt in North Somerset 19 3. Mendip Hills AONB in North Somerset 24 4. Ramsar sites, SPA’s and SAC’s in North Somerset 30 5. Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs) in North 32 Somerset 6. National and local nature reserves in North Somerset 32 7. Conservation areas, Listed buildings, Scheduled 34 monuments, Registered and Unregistered Parks and Gardens in North Somerset 8. Fluvial and Tidal Flood zones 3a and 3b 37 List of Tables: 1. Population growth 1991 – 2011 20 2. Population comparisons by age group 20 3. Percentage of persons in employment by occupation 25 2 4. Employment and unemployment rates 26 5. Enterprise births and deaths 26 6. Retail vacancy rates: town centres – 2016 27 7. Retail vacancy rates: district and local centres – 2016 27 8. SSSI condition 33 9. Carbon emissions 39 10. Current and likely future Sustainability Issues in North 40 Somerset and the role of the North Somerset Local Plan 11. -
WESTON PLACEMAKING STRATEGY 03 Image by Paul Blakemore 3.0 Weston Placemaking Strategy 20 3.0 Weston Placemaking Strategy 21
Image by Paul Blakemore ON THE BEACH AT WESTON, WE SET OFF THROUGH WILD SWIMMERS WAIT IN LINE, THE OLD ESTATE, TO JOIN THE ROUGH BEYOND THE SCHOOL, AND TUMBLE TIDE TOWARDS THE GOLF COURSE, AND SURFACE FROM WHERE BEST MATES, THE RUSH OF LIFE. MIKE AND DAVE, ONCE PLAYED, HOW BRAVE THEY ARE — COLLECTING TRUANT FLY-AWAYS. ALL GOOSEBUMPS AND GRACE. WE REACH OUR BREATHLESS DESTINATION: UPHILL, OUT ON THE EDGE, WHERE THE SKY IS AN ARROW THEY FEEL A SENSE OF PLACE. THROUGH OUR HEART LOOK UP AT THE SOFTENED AND A PROBLEM SHARED JAWLINE OF THIS TOWN. IS A PROBLEM HALVED. FLAT HOLM, STEEP HOLM, THERE IT IS — THE CLEARING, BREAN DOWN. WITH ITS LAUGHTERFUL HERE, WE ARE LOST OF BLUEBELLS, AND INSTANTLY FOUND. AND THEN THE CHURCH, THE SKY, THE BIRDS. Contents Covid-19 This project had engaged with thousands of people about their town and their hopes for 02–03 the future by the time Covid-19 hit the UK. 1 Introduction People had expressed their ambitions for a more diversified town centre, with opportunities for leisure and play; space for business to start, invest and grow; and better homes with empty sites finally built out. 04–15 As in all parts of the country, the lockdown had 2 Weston-super-Mare a severe impact on the economy in the town centre and a visitor economy largely predicated on high volumes of day visitors. Prolonged and combined efforts and partnership between national, regional and local government, 16–27 employers, community networks and local 3 SuperWeston people will be needed to restore confidence and economic activity. -
Ancient Dumnonia
ancient Dumnonia. BT THE REV. W. GRESWELL. he question of the geographical limits of Ancient T Dumnonia lies at the bottom of many problems of Somerset archaeology, not the least being the question of the western boundaries of the County itself. Dcmnonia, Dumnonia and Dz^mnonia are variations of the original name, about which we learn much from Professor Rhys.^ Camden, in his Britannia (vol. i), adopts the form Danmonia apparently to suit a derivation of his own from “ Duns,” a hill, “ moina ” or “mwyn,” a mine, w’hich is surely fanciful, and, therefore, to be rejected. This much seems certain that Dumnonia is the original form of Duffneint, the modern Devonia. This is, of course, an extremely respectable pedigree for the Western County, which seems to be unique in perpetuating in its name, and, to a certain extent, in its history, an ancient Celtic king- dom. Such old kingdoms as “ Demetia,” in South Wales, and “Venedocia” (albeit recognisable in Gwynneth), high up the Severn Valley, about which we read in our earliest records, have gone, but “Dumnonia” lives on in beautiful Devon. It also lives on in West Somerset in history, if not in name, if we mistake not. Historically speaking, we may ask where was Dumnonia ? and who were the Dumnonii ? Professor Rhys reminds us (1). Celtic Britain, by G. Rhys, pp. 290-291. — 176 Papers, §*c. that there were two peoples so called, the one in the South West of the Island and the other in the North, ^ resembling one another in one very important particular, vizo, in living in districts adjoining the seas, and, therefore, in being maritime. -
Download Annex A
Landscape Character Assessment in the Blackdown Hills AONB Landscape character describes the qualities and features that make a place distinctive. It can represent an area larger than the AONB or focus on a very specific location. The Blackdown Hills AONB displays a variety of landscape character within a relatively small, distinct area. These local variations in character within the AONB’s landscape are articulated through the Devon-wide Landscape Character Assessment (LCA), which describes the variations in character between different areas and types of landscape in the county and covers the entire AONB. www.devon.gov.uk/planning/planning-policies/landscape/devons-landscape-character- assessment What information does the Devon LCA contain? Devon has been divided into unique geographical areas sharing similar character and recognisable at different scales: 7 National Character Areas, broadly similar areas of landscape defined at a national scale by Natural England and named to an area recognisable on a national scale, for example, ‘Blackdowns’ and ‘Dartmoor’. There are 159 National Character Areas (NCA) in England; except for a very small area in the far west which falls into the Devon Redlands NCA, the Blackdown Hills AONB is within Blackdowns NCA. Further details: www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-character-area-profiles-data-for-local- decision-making/national-character-area-profiles#ncas-in-south-west-england 68 Devon Character Areas, unique, geographically-specific areas of landscape. Each Devon Character Area has an individual identity, but most comprise several different Landscape Character Types. Devon Character Areas are called by a specific place name, for example, ‘Blackdown Hills Scarp’ and ‘Axe Valley’. -
Severn Estuary RCZAS Updated Project Design for Phase 2 Main
Severn Estuary Rapid Coastal Zone Assessment Survey Updated Project Design for Phase 2 Main Fieldwork for English Heritage (HEEP Project No. 3885) Toby Catchpole and Adrian M. Chadwick Version 2 Revised, March 2010 Contents List of figures ............................................................................................................ iii Project details ............................................................................................................ v Summary ................................................................................................................. vii 1 Introduction and project background..................................................................1 2 Research aims and objectives ...........................................................................3 3 Summary of Phases 1 and 2a ...........................................................................5 3.1 Introduction .........................................................................................5 3.2 Sites identified as requiring further study in Phase 2a ......................... 5 3.3 The results of the Phase 2a fieldwork ................................................. 6 4 Project interfaces ...............................................................................................9 5 Communications and project products ............................................................. 11 6 Project review ..................................................................................................13 7 Health -
Heritage at Risk in Northern Ireland
HERITAGE AT RISK IN NORTHERN IRELAND REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS January 2019 A report by Ulster Architectural Heritage, as part of the Built Heritage at Risk Project, funded by Department for Communities, Historic Environment Division, 2013 - 2016. Published January 2019. FOREWARD: The Built Heritage at Risk Northern Ireland (BHARNI) project was first established in 1993 as a partnership between the Ulster Architectural Heritage Society (UAHS) now retitled Ulster Architectural Heritage (UAH), and the then Environment and Heritage Service of the Department of the Environment which became NIEA, and now, the Historic Environment Division (HED) of the Department for Communities. It was initially named the ‘Buildings at Risk’ (BAR), becoming ‘Built Heritage at Risk Northern Ireland’ in 2006. Our thanks go to Mrs Primrose Wilson CBE, current President of UAH, who was instrumental in establishing and maintaining the project. We would like to formally acknowledge her tremendous support, without which the heritage at risk project could not have succeeded. I also want to pay tribute to the Department Officers and UAH staff who over the years brought a focus and dynamism to the project ensuring it was both appropriate and innovative. This report, commissioned in 2016, is based on statistics and information gathered at that time. The review and recommendations have been extensively developed in the interim period, and this report has formed the basis upon which UAH has proposed to move the heritage at risk project forward, in a recently renewed agreement with HED from April 2019. Though some figures may have changed to a degree in the intervening period, this is not seen to effect overall trends discussed in this report, and recommendations set out remain at time of release in 2019. -
8 Cultural Heritage
Transport Scotland A82 Pulpit Rock Improvement Environmental Statement 8 Cultural Heritage 8.1 Introduction This chapter considers the likely effects on cultural heritage of the proposed upgrading and realignment of a section of the A82, close to the Scheduled Monument Pulpit Rock. The assessment has been carried out by CFA Archaeology Ltd, informed by information provided by Historic Scotland and The West of Scotland Archaeology Service (WoSAS) in response to request for Information. Cultural Heritage resources are considered to include: • World Heritage Sites; • Scheduled Monuments and other archaeological features; • Listed Buildings and other buildings of historic or architectural importance; • Conservation Areas and other significant townscapes; and • Historic Gardens and Designed Landscapes and other significant historic landscapes. Those resources relevant to this development are: Scheduled Monuments and other archaeological features; Listed Buildings and other buildings of historic or architectural value. There are no Historic Garden and Designed Landscapes and other significant historic landscapes; World Heritage Sites or Conservation areas within the assessment area. The specific objectives of this cultural heritage assessment are to: • Identify the cultural heritage baseline within and in the vicinity of the proposed development area; • Assess the proposed development site in terms of its archaeological and historic environment potential; • Consider the potential and predicted effects of the construction and operation of the proposed development on the cultural heritage resources, within the context of relevant legislation and policy guidelines; • Propose measures, where appropriate, to mitigate any predicted significant adverse effects. There are a number of cultural heritage receptors within 1km of the proposed development and Figure 8.1 – Cultural Heritage Assets depicts the locations of those sites identified and discussed throughout this chapter. -
Great Bealings Neighbourhood Plan a Village in a Landscape
Great Bealings Neighbourhood Plan A village in a landscape Referendum Version December 2016 Great Bealings Neighbourhood Plan ‘A Village in a Landscape’ Mission Statement Our aim is to maintain and enhance the special character of our small village within its natural setting while ensuring that the community who has chosen to live here can control, shape and contribute to how it evolves for the benefit of themselves, future residents and subsequent generations. Contents Page 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. HISTORICAL CONTEXT 6 3. STRATEGY AND APPROACH 11 4. NATURAL ENVIRONMENT 16 5. BUILT ENVIRONMENT 31 6. NON-STATUTORY ANNEX Error! Bookmark not defined. 7. REFERENCES – accessed 1 September 2015 41 Appendices 1. Maps 2. Listed Buildings 3. Non Designated Heritage Assets 4. SCDC Guidance on design criteria and materials 5. Community Engagement Strategy 6. Neighbourhood Plan Questionnaire Responses 7. NPPF Guidance re. Neighbourhood Planning 8. Housing Needs Survey 9. Landscape and Wildlife Evaluation Supporting documents Where not included in this full printed version of the Plan, these are published on the website, www.gbnp.co.uk, with kind permission, and available from their respective publishing bodies: Great Bealings Neighbourhood Plan: Landscape and Wildlife Evaluation, published by Simone Bullion, Suffolk Wildlife Trust Suffolk’s Nature Strategy, published by Suffolk County Council Great Bealings Neighbourhood Plan Questionnaire, published by Great Bealings Parish Council Housing Needs Survey, published by Community Action Suffolk Great Bealings NP [19.00c] Page 1 Published 8 March 2016 The Plan as a whole is published by Great Bealings Parish Council, March 2016 Cover photo by Gary Farmer – thanks also to the many contributors Submission Version 19.00, 8 March 2016 Great Bealings NP [19.00c] Page 2 Published 8 March 2016 1. -
Congress of Archaeological Societies
CONGRESS OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETIES, JUNE 26th, 1914. KEPOBT OF THE COMMITTEE ON ANCIENT EARTHWORKS FORTIFIED ENCLOSURES. Chairman : The Eight Hon. the EARL OF CRAWFORD AND BBLCARRES, LL.D., V.P.S.A. A. HADRIAN ALLCROFI, M.A. Sir W. ST. JOHN HOPE, M.A., Col. F. W. T. ATTREE, F.S.A. Litt. D., D.C.L. G. A. AUDEN, M.A., M.D., F.S.A. W. M. I'ANSON, F.S.A. C. H. BoiHAMLEy, M.Sc., F.I.C. H. LAYER, F.S.A. A. G. CHATER. C. LYNAM, F.S.A. J. G. N. CLIFT. D. H. MONTGOMERIE, F.S.A. ROBERT COCHRANE, I.S.O.,LL.D., Col. W. LL. MORGAN. F.S.A. T. DAVIES PRYCE. W.G.COLLINGWOOD,M.A.,F.S.A. Sir HERCULES READ, LL.D., "WlLLOUGHBY GARDNER, F.S.A. V.P.S.A. H. ST. GEORGE GRAY. Col. 0. E. RUCK, F.S.A. (Scot.). Professor F. HAVERFIELD, M.A., W. M. TAPP, LL.D., F.S.A. F.S.A. J. P. WILLIAMS-FREEMAN, M.D. ALBANY F. MAJOR, Hon. Secretary. (Address: 30, The Waldrons, Croydon.) REPORT OF THE EARTHWORKS COMMITTEE. The outstanding feature of the past year has been the passing into law of the Ancient Monuments Consoli dation and Amendment Bill, reference to which was made in the report of the Committee last year. The working of the new Act is likely to make considerable demands on the activities and watchfulness of societies interested in archaeology. In view of this, various changes have been made in the personnel of the Committee, as detailed below.