DOCSLIB.ORG

Aeronautical Chart Users' Guide Terminal Procedure Publications

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Aeronautical Chart Users' Guide Terminal Procedure Publications Federal Aviation Administration Aeronautical Information Services Aeronautical Chart Users’ Guide Terminal Procedure Publications Eff ective as of 16 July 2020 Table of Contents WHAT’S NEW? .....................................................................................................5 VFR CHARTS ..............................................................................................................................5 IFR ENROUTE CHARTS ............................................................................................................5 TERMINAL PROCEDURE PUBLICATION (TPP) .......................................................................5 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 7 KEEP YOUR CHARTS CURRENT .............................................................................................7 EFFECTIVE DATE OF CHART USERS’ GUIDE AND UPDATES ...............................................7 COLOR VARIATION ....................................................................................................................7 REPORTING CHART DISCREPANCIES ....................................................................................7 U.S. TERMINAL PROCEDURES PUBLICATION ................................................ 9 EXPLANATION OF TPP TERMS AND SYMBOLS .....................................................................9 INSTRUMENT APPROACH PROCEDURE CHART .................................................................10 PLANVIEW ................................................................................................................................17 NAVAIDS ...................................................................................................................................20 MISSED APPROACH INFORMATION ......................................................................................26 PROFILE VIEW .........................................................................................................................27 of Contents Table Guide - Chart Users’ FAA LANDING MINIMUMS ...............................................................................................................30 AIRPORT SKETCH ...................................................................................................................32 AIRPORT DIAGRAMS ..............................................................................................................33 DEPARTURE PROCEDURES (DPs) ........................................................................................35 STANDARD TERMINAL ARRIVAL (STARs) CHARTS ..............................................................36 CHARTED VISUAL FLIGHT PROCEDURE (CVFP) CHARTS .................................................36 U.S. TERMINAL PROCEDURES PUBLICATION SYMBOLS ........................... 37 GENERAL INFORMATION ........................................................................................................37 LEGEND - STANDARD TERMINAL ARRIVAL (STAR) CHARTS - DEPARTURE PROCEDURE (DP) CHARTS ....................................................................................................................................37 APPROACH LIGHTING SYSTEM.............................................................................................38 AIRPORT DIAGRAM/AIRPORT SKETCH ................................................................................40 PLANVIEW SYMBOLS..............................................................................................................41 PROFILE VIEW .........................................................................................................................43 COLD TEMPERATURE AIRPORTS..........................................................................................44 REFERENCES .................................................................................................... 45 ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................... 47 A ................................................................................................................................................47 B ................................................................................................................................................47 C ................................................................................................................................................47 D ................................................................................................................................................47 E ................................................................................................................................................47 F ................................................................................................................................................47 G ................................................................................................................................................47 H ................................................................................................................................................48 3 Table of Contents I..................................................................................................................................................48 J .................................................................................................................................................48 K ................................................................................................................................................48 L .................................................................................................................................................48 M ................................................................................................................................................48 N ................................................................................................................................................48 O ................................................................................................................................................48 P ................................................................................................................................................48 R ................................................................................................................................................49 S ................................................................................................................................................49 T ................................................................................................................................................49 U ................................................................................................................................................49 V ................................................................................................................................................49 W ...............................................................................................................................................49 FAA Chart Users’ Guide - Table of Contents Table Guide - Chart Users’ FAA 4 WHAT’S NEW? Update as of 16 July 2020 The following charting items have been added to the Online Chart Users’ Guide since the Guide was last published on 21 May 2020: VFR CHARTS No Changes Applied IFR ENROUTE CHARTS No Changes Applied TERMINAL PROCEDURE PUBLICATION (TPP) Clarifi cation of the profi le procedure track depiction for non-precision approach procedures. FAA Chart Users’ Guide - What’s New Guide - What’s Chart Users’ FAA Clarifi cation of the 34:1 surface clear stipple symbol depiction in the profi le. 5 FAA Chart Users’ Guide - What’s New Guide - What’s Chart Users’ FAA 6 INTRODUCTION This Chart Users’ Guide is an introduction to the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) aeronautical charts and publica- tions. It is useful to new pilots as a learning aid, and to experienced pilots as a quick reference guide. The FAA is the source for all data and information utilized in the publishing of aeronautical charts through authorized publishers for each stage of Visual Flight Rules (VFR) and Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) air navigation including training, planning, and departures, enroute (for low and high altitudes), approaches, and taxiing charts. Digital charts are available online at: • VFR Charts - https://www.faa.gov/air_traffi c/fl ight_info/aeronav/digital_products/vfr/ • IFR Charts - https://www.faa.gov/air_traffi c/fl ight_info/aeronav/digital_products/ifr/ • Terminal Procedures Publication - http://www.faa.gov/air_traffi c/fl ight_info/aeronav/digital_products/dtpp/ • Chart Supplements - https://www.faa.gov/air_traffi c/fl ight_info/aeronav/digital_products/dafd/ Paper copies of the charts are available through an FAA Approved Print Provider. A complete list of current providers is available at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffi c/fl ight_info/aeronav/print_providers/ The FAA Aeronautical Information Manual (AIM) Pilot/Controller Glossary defi nes in detail, all terms and abbreviations used throughout this publication. Unless otherwise indicated, miles are nautical miles (NM), altitudes indicate feet above Mean Sea Level (MSL), and times used are Coordinated Universal Time (UTC).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Enhancing Flight-Crew Monitoring Skills Can Increase Flight Safety
    Enhancing Flight-crew Monitoring Skills Can Increase Flight Safety 55th International Air Safety Seminar Flight Safety Foundation November 4–7, 2002 • Dublin, Ireland Captain Robert L. Sumwalt, III Chairman, Human Factors and Training Group Air Line Pilots Association, International Captain Ronald J. Thomas Supervisor, Flight Training and Standards US Airways Key Dismukes, Ph.D. Chief Scientist for Aerospace Human Factors NASA Ames Research Center To ensure the highest levels of safety each flight crewmember must carefully monitor the aircraft’s flight path and systems, as well as actively cross-check the actions of each other.1 Effective crew monitoring and cross-checking can literally be the last line of defense; when a crewmember can catch an error or unsafe act, this detection may break the chain of events leading to an accident scenario. Conversely, when this layer of defense is absent the error may go undetected, leading to adverse safety consequences. Following a fatal controlled flight into terrain (CFIT) approach and landing accident (ALA) involving a corporate turbo-prop the surviving pilot (who was the Pilot Not Flying) told one of the authors of this paper, “If I had been watching the instruments I could have prevented the accident.” This pilot’s poignant statement is quite telling; in essence, he is stating that if he had better monitored the flight instruments he could have detected the aircraft’s descent below the minimum descent altitude (MDA) before it struck terrain. This pilot’s statement is eerily similar to a conclusion reached by the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) after an airliner descended through the MDA and impacted terrain during a nighttime instrument approach.
    [Show full text]
  • Aircraft Engine Performance Study Using Flight Data Recorder Archives
    Aircraft Engine Performance Study Using Flight Data Recorder Archives Yashovardhan S. Chati∗ and Hamsa Balakrishnan y Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02139, USA Aircraft emissions are a significant source of pollution and are closely related to engine fuel burn. The onboard Flight Data Recorder (FDR) is an accurate source of information as it logs operational aircraft data in situ. The main objective of this paper is the visualization and exploration of data from the FDR. The Airbus A330 - 223 is used to study the variation of normalized engine performance parameters with the altitude profile in all the phases of flight. A turbofan performance analysis model is employed to calculate the theoretical thrust and it is shown to be a good qualitative match to the FDR reported thrust. The operational thrust settings and the times in mode are found to differ significantly from the ICAO standard values in the LTO cycle. This difference can lead to errors in the calculation of aircraft emission inventories. This paper is the first step towards the accurate estimation of engine performance and emissions for different aircraft and engine types, given the trajectory of an aircraft. I. Introduction Aircraft emissions depend on engine characteristics, particularly on the fuel flow rate and the thrust. It is therefore, important to accurately assess engine performance and operational fuel burn. Traditionally, the estimation of fuel burn and emissions has been done using the ICAO Aircraft Engine Emissions Databank1. However, this method is approximate and the results have been shown to deviate from the measured values of emissions from aircraft in operation2,3.
    [Show full text]
  • FAA) Privacy Impact Assessment Service Availability Prediction Tool (SAPT)
    U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administraiton (FAA) Privacy Impact Assessment Service Availability Prediction Tool (SAPT) Responsible Official David E. Gray Program Manager [email protected] Approving Official Claire W. Barrett Chief Privacy & Information Asset Officer Office of the Chief Information Officer [email protected] 0 U.S. Department of Transportation Executive Summary On May 28, 2010, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) published the Automatic Dependent Surveillance – Broadcast (ADS-B) final rule mandating that aircraft flying in certain controlled airspace be equipped with ADS-B Out capability not later than January 1, 2020.1 In turn, the FAA developed the Service Availability Prediction Tool (SAPT) to assist pilots, dispatchers, and commercial operators in checking their predicted navigation and surveillance availability before a flight as well as handle requests for Air Traffic Control (ATC) authorization pursuant to 14 CFR § 91.225(g). The SAPT has three main components: Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring (RAIM) SAPT, Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) SAPT, and ADS-B Deviation Authorization Pre-Flight Tool (ADAPT). This Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) was developed pursuant to Section 208 of the E-Government Act of 2002 because the SAPT includes a web-based capability to collect and manage Personally Identifiable Information (PII) captured from aircraft operators to facilitate the automated handling of ATC authorization requests and FAA’s responses. What is a Privacy Impact Assessment? The Privacy Act of 1974 articulates concepts for how the federal government should treat individuals and their information and imposes duties upon federal agencies regarding the collection, use, dissemination, and maintenance of personally identifiable information (PII).
    [Show full text]
  • E6bmanual2016.Pdf
    ® Electronic Flight Computer SPORTY’S E6B ELECTRONIC FLIGHT COMPUTER Sporty’s E6B Flight Computer is designed to perform 24 aviation functions and 20 standard conversions, and includes timer and clock functions. We hope that you enjoy your E6B Flight Computer. Its use has been made easy through direct path menu selection and calculation prompting. As you will soon learn, Sporty’s E6B is one of the most useful and versatile of all aviation computers. Copyright © 2016 by Sportsman’s Market, Inc. Version 13.16A page: 1 CONTENTS BEFORE USING YOUR E6B ...................................................... 3 DISPLAY SCREEN .................................................................... 4 PROMPTS AND LABELS ........................................................... 5 SPECIAL FUNCTION KEYS ....................................................... 7 FUNCTION MENU KEYS ........................................................... 8 ARITHMETIC FUNCTIONS ........................................................ 9 AVIATION FUNCTIONS ............................................................. 9 CONVERSIONS ....................................................................... 10 CLOCK FUNCTION .................................................................. 12 ADDING AND SUBTRACTING TIME ....................................... 13 TIMER FUNCTION ................................................................... 14 HEADING AND GROUND SPEED ........................................... 15 PRESSURE AND DENSITY ALTITUDE ...................................
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation Definitions
    Aviation Definitions: A Air Carrier - A commercial airline with published schedules operating at least five round trips per week. Airport Layout Plan (ALP) - The official, FAA approved map of an airport's facilities Air Route Traffic Control Center (ARTCC)- A facility providing air traffic control to aircraft on an IFR flight plan within controlled airspace and principally during the enroute phase of flight. Air Taxi - An aircraft certificated for commercial service available for hire on demand. Air Traffic Control (ATC)- The control of aircraft traffic, in the vicinity of airports from control towers, and in the airways between airports from control centers Air Traffic Control Tower (ATCT)- A central operations tower in the terminal air traffic control system with an associated IFR room if radar equipped, using air/ground communications and/or radar, visual signaling and other devices to provide safe, expeditious movement of air traffic. Altitude MSL - Aircraft altitude measured in feet above mean sea level. Approach Lighting System (ALS) - Radiating light beams guiding pilots to the extended centerline of the runway on final approach and landing. Approach Lights - High intensity lights located along the approach path at the end of an instrument runway. Approach lights aid the pilot in the transition from instrument flight conditions to visual conditions at the end of an instrument approach. Arrival - The act of landing at an airport. Arrival Procedure - A series of directions from air traffic control, using fixes and procedures, to guide an aircraft from the enroute environment to an airport for landing. Arrival Stream - A flow of aircraft following similar arrival procedures.
    [Show full text]
  • Instrument Standard Operating Procedures
    INSTRUMENT STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES INTRODUCTION PRE-FLIGHT ACTIONS BASIC INSTRUMENT MANEUVERS UNUSUAL ATTITUDE RECOVERY HOLDING PROCEDURES INSTRUMENT APPROACH PROCEDURES APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION AND THEORY .......................................................................................................... 1 PRE-FLIGHT ACTIONS ........................................................................................................................ 3 IMC WEATHER ................................................................................................................................... 3 PRE-FLIGHT INSTRUMENT CHECKS ......................................................................................... 3 BASIC INSTRUMENT MANEUVERS ................................................................................................... 6 STRAIGHT AND LEVEL FLIGHT (SLF) ......................................................................................... 6 CHANGES OF AIRSPEEDS .......................................................................................................... 8 CONSTANT AIRSPEED CLIMBS AND DESCENTS ..................................................................... 9 CONSTANT RATE CLIMBS AND DESCENTS ............................................................................ 10 TIMED TURNS TO MAGNETIC COMPASS HEADINGS ............................................................ 12 MAGNETIC COMPASS TURNS .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Performance Improvement Methods for Terrain Database Integrity
    PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT METHODS FOR TERRAIN DATABASE INTEGRITY MONITORS AND TERRAIN REFERENCED NAVIGATION A thesis presented to the Faculty of the Fritz J. and Dolores H. Russ College of Engineering and Technology of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science Ananth Kalyan Vadlamani March 2004 This thesis entitled PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT METHODS FOR TERRAIN DATABASE INTEGRITY MONITORS AND TERRAIN REFERENCED NAVIGATION BY ANANTH KALYAN VADLAMANI has been approved for the School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science and the Russ College of Engineering and Technology by Maarten Uijt de Haag Assistant Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science R. Dennis Irwin Dean, Russ College of Engineering and Technology VADLAMANI, ANANTH K. M.S. March 2004. Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Performance Improvement Methods for Terrain Database Integrity Monitors and Terrain Referenced Navigation (115pp.) Director of Thesis: Maarten Uijt de Haag Terrain database integrity monitors and terrain-referenced navigation systems are based on performing a comparison between stored terrain elevations with data from airborne sensors like radar altimeters, inertial measurement units, GPS receivers etc. This thesis introduces the concept of a spatial terrain database integrity monitor and discusses methods to improve its performance. Furthermore, this thesis discusses an improvement of the terrain-referenced aircraft position estimation for aircraft navigation using only the information from downward-looking sensors and terrain databases, and not the information from the inertial measurement unit. Vertical and horizontal failures of the terrain database are characterized. Time and frequency domain techniques such as the Kalman filter, the autocorrelation function and spectral estimation are designed to evaluate the performance of the proposed integrity monitor and position estimator performance using flight test data from Eagle/Vail, CO, Juneau, AK, Asheville, NC and Albany, OH.
    [Show full text]
  • N87- 19393 CE Bith Ab AUTCEETIC TESMINAL EM (BASA) 21 P CSCL 17Ti Unclas H1/06 43501 NASA Tech Ni Ca I Paper 2669
    ) A SIPSCLATICL EVALUATION GP A N87- 19393 CE bITH Ab AUTCEETIC TESMINAL EM (BASA) 21 p CSCL 17ti Unclas H1/06 43501 NASA Tech ni ca I Paper 2669 1987 A Simulation Evaluation of a Pilot Interface With an Automatic Terminal Approach System David A. Hinton Langley Research Center Hampt o n, Virginia National Aeronautics and Space Administration Scientific and Technical Information Branch Summary with a high potential for mistakes and has limited time to detect and correct any errors. A successful A piloted-simulation study was performed to arrival depends on the correct interpretation of ap- evaluate the pilot interface with an automatic termi- proach chart details, the correct setting of numerous nal approach system (ATAS). The ATAS was con- cockpit controls, and precise aircraft guidance near ceived as a concept for improving the pilot inter- the ground. face with high levels of automation. It consists of Automation in the form of an autopilot has been instrument approach data storage, automatic radio used to reduce pilot work load and improve pilot tuning, autopilot, autothrottle, and annunciation of performance in the terminal area. Research studies These components allow the ATAS flight status. (ref. 2) and airplane accident and incident reports to automatically execute instrument approaches, in- suggest, however, that the probability of pilot error cluding procedure turns, altitude changes, missed actually increases with an increase in automation, approaches, and holding patterns, without requir- partially because of design limitations of the pilot- ing the pilot to set up navigation radios or change machine interface. Conventional autopilot interfaces autopilot modes. provide the pilot with many opportunities to make The results show that fewer pilot blunders were errors because of the requirements to change radio made during approaches when using the ATAS than frequencies and autopilot modes as the approach when using a baseline, heading-select autopilot.
    [Show full text]
  • Initiating a Missed Approach Below Mda
    Issue No. 9 INITIATING A MISSED APPROACH BELOW MDA So there you are, on approach, inside the FAF and below MDA. You saw the runway and began descent, but it is raining, visibility is marginal and things are murky and scuddy (technical terms). Wind is directly across the runway at 11G18 and you are crabbing down, passengers are nervous. But you are holding the CDI in the center and maintaining control. Over the runway you go into your wing-low sideslip for the crosswind landing, things are going pretty well and then whoops a big gust destabilizes you so you abort the landing. Now what do you do, go missed or go around for another landing attempt? To provide some context, let’s attach the scenario to an interesting little airport, Andrews- Murphy Airport, NC (KRHP). The instrument approach procedure (IAP) and the takeoff minima and obstacle departure procedure are shown here. This airport is nestled in a scenic valley surrounded by mountains, which are quite close on the north. A topo map can be viewed here or just go to the TopoZone website and search for Andrews, NC, or go to the airport lat/long of 3512N/08352W. You will notice that the MDA is 2329 feet above the runway. Now remember that obstacle protection on a missed approach procedure is based on going missed at the MAP at MDA with a minimum climb gradient of 200 feet per nautical mile. No obstacle protection is assured when you go missed below MDA or past the MAP. In fact, you are not assured of obstacle protection even above MDA if the missed is initiated below MDA or after the MAP.
    [Show full text]
  • Off Airport Ops Guide
    Off Airport Ops Guide TECHNIQUES FOR OFF AIRPORT OPERATIONS weight and balance limitations for your aircraft. Always file a flight plan detailing the specific locations you intend Note: This document suggests techniques and proce- to explore. Make at least 3 recon passes at different levels dures to improve the safety of off-airport operations. before attempting a landing and don’t land unless you’re It assumes that pilots have received training on those sure you have enough room to take off. techniques and procedures and is not meant to replace instruction from a qualified and experienced flight instruc- High Level: Circle the area from different directions to de- tor. termine the best possible landing site in the vicinity. Check the wind direction and speed using pools of water, drift General Considerations: Off-airport operations can be of the plane, branches, grass, dust, etc. Observe the land- extremely rewarding; transporting people and gear to lo- ing approach and departure zone for obstructions such as cations that would be difficult or impossible to reach in trees or high terrain. any other way. Operating off-airport requires high perfor- mance from pilot and aircraft and acquiring the knowledge Intermediate: Level: Make a pass in both directions along and experience to conduct these operations safely takes either side of the runway to check for obstructions and time. Learning and practicing off-airport techniques under runway length. Check for rock size. Note the location of the supervision of an experienced flight instructor will not the touchdown area and roll-out area. Associate land- only make you safer, but also save you time and expense.
    [Show full text]
  • Interim Criteria for Precision Approach Obstacle Assessment and Category II/III Instrument Landing System
    Canceled by Order 8260.3C [03-14-2016] Federal Aviation Administration Memorandum Date: AUG 1 6 2011 To: Chas. Frederic Anderson, Acting Director, Aeronautical Products, AJV-3 From: Leslie H. Smith, Manager, Flight Technologies~:f~~J~~UO¥' AFS-400 Subject: Interim Criteria for Precision Approach Obstacle Assessment and Category WIII Instrument Landing System (ILS) Requirements This memorandum cancels and replaces the December 21, 2007 memorandum, same subject. It incorporates minor editorial revisions as well as the following changes summarized below: 1. A reference to Advisory Circular (AC) 150/5300-13, Airport Design, has been added to paragraph 2.3.2. Paragraphs 2.3.2a, b, c, and d have been deleted since the information duplicates the relevant content in this AC. 2. The formula for Case 2 in paragraph 6.9.1 has been corrected to reflect the use of"f" instead of"e". 3. The formula at the bottom of figure 5 has been corrected to reflect the use of the airport elevation instead ofthe runway elevation. Change bars in the margin of Appendix 1 indicate changes made from the 21 Dec 2007 memorandum. Incorporation ofthese criteria into Order 8260.3B has been delayed; apply the criteria in the attachments to this memorandum in the interim. Ifyou have any questions, please contact AFS-420 at 405-954-4164. Attachment: Appendix ] cc: Wayne D. Fetty, Division Manager, U.S. Air Force Instrument Procedure Center James M. Foster, Branch Manager, U.S. Army Aeronautical Services Agency Daniel E. Lehman, Deputy Head, U.S. Naval Flight Information Group CANCELEDArthur J. Snyder, CDR, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • TP308 Vol 3.Pdf
    TP 308/GPH 209 CRITERIA FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF INSTRUMENT PROCEDURES TP 308 / GPH 209 – CHANGE 7 VOLUME 3 PRECISION APPROACH (PA) PROCEDURE CONSTRUCTION TRANSPORT CANADA NATIONAL DEFENSE 5 January 2017 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK TP 308/GPH 209 Volume 3 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS GENERAL INFORMATION ........................................................................................................ 1 1.0 Purpose .......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Background .................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Definitions ....................................................................................................................................... 1 CHAPTER 2. GENERAL CRITERIA ................................................................................... 2–1 2.0 General ....................................................................................................................................... 2–1 2.1 Data Resolution .......................................................................................................................... 2–1 2.2 Procedure Identification .............................................................................................................. 2–1 2.3 En Route, Initial, And Intermediate Segments ............................................................................ 2–1
    [Show full text]