Are Epigenetic Mechanisms Involved in Axonal Regeneration?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Are Epigenetic Mechanisms Involved in Axonal Regeneration? Are Epigenetic Mechanisms Involved in Axonal Regeneration? Dissertation der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen zur Erlangung des Grades eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaften (Dr. rer. nat.) vorgelegt von Ricco Lindner aus Leipzig Tübingen 2013 Tag der mündlichen Qualifikation: Dekan: Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Rosenstiel 1. Berichterstatter: Prof. Dr. Philipp Kahle 2. Berichterstatter: Prof. Dr. Robert Feil Role of Epigenetic Mechanisms in Axonal Regeneration I Index of Contents I. Eidesstattliche Erklärung ....................................................................................... III II. Acknowledgment ..................................................................................................... IV III. Zusammenfassung ..................................................................................................... V IV. Executive Summary ............................................................................................... VII 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 2 1.1 Nerve injury and regeneration .................................................................................. 2 1.1.1 Axonal regeneration in the peripheral and central nervous system ............... 2 1.1.2 Dorsal root ganglia - a model for axonal regeneration .................................... 4 1.1.3 The extrinsic environment in the CNS inhibits axonal regeneration ............. 5 1.1.4 Intrinsic factors for successful or inhibited axonal regeneration ................... 8 1.2 Epigenetic mechanisms ............................................................................................ 11 1.2.1 DNA methylation ............................................................................................... 12 1.2.1.1 Cytosine methylation and CpG islands ............................................................... 12 1.2.1.2 DNA methyltransferases and DNA demethylation ............................................. 15 1.2.1.3 CpG-binding proteins .......................................................................................... 16 1.2.1.4 DNA methylation in genomic imprinting and embryonic development ............. 17 1.2.1.5 DNA methylation in the CNS and upon nerve injury ......................................... 18 1.2.2 Histone modifications ........................................................................................ 19 1.2.2.1 Histone acetylation, deacetylation, and modifying enzymes .............................. 21 1.2.2.2 Histone methylation, demethylation, and modifying enzymes ........................... 23 1.3 Hypothesis ................................................................................................................. 25 1.4 Project outline ........................................................................................................... 26 2 Results ........................................................................................................................ 28 2.1 Involvement of gene promoter DNA methylation in axonal regeneration .......... 28 2.1.1 Establishment of Methylated DNA immunoprecipitation (MeDIP) ............. 28 2.1.2 DNA methylation microarray analysis ............................................................ 30 2.1.3 Gene expression of DNA methyltransferases upon nerve injury .................. 35 2.1.4 Hypermethylated or hypomethylated genes ................................................... 36 2.1.5 Differentially methylated genes for both injury types ................................... 41 2.1.6 Gene expression levels of differentially methylated genes correlated with the promoter methylation status ............................................................. 43 2.1.7 Gene expression of regeneration-associated genes following nerve injury .. 44 2.1.8 CpG island analysis of regeneration-associated genes and of differentially methylated genes ........................................................................ 47 2.2 Involvement of gene promoter histone modifications in axonal regeneration .... 50 2.2.1 Gene promoter H3-K9 acetylation and dimethylation were differentially regulated upon SNA or DCA .................................................... 50 2.2.2 PCAF enhanced neurite outgrowth, RAG expression, and H3-K9 acetylation of cultured DRG or cerebellar granule neurons (CGN) ............ 52 Role of Epigenetic Mechanisms in Axonal Regeneration II 3 Discussion .................................................................................................................. 56 3.1 Summary of Results ................................................................................................. 56 3.2 Role of DNA methylation in axonal regeneration ................................................. 57 3.2.1 Experimental setup and MeDIP-chip .............................................................. 57 3.2.2 DNA methylation and expression of DNA methyltransferases ..................... 58 3.2.3 Hypermethylated and hypomethylated genes ................................................. 61 3.2.4 Differentially methylated genes ........................................................................ 64 3.2.5 Regeneration-associated genes ......................................................................... 66 3.2.6 CpG island analysis ........................................................................................... 70 3.3 Role of histone modifications in axonal regeneration ........................................... 72 4 Conclusions and Outlook ......................................................................................... 76 5 Material and Methods .............................................................................................. 79 5.1 Material ..................................................................................................................... 79 5.1.1 Buffers and Solutions, Chemicals and Reagents, Enzymes ........................... 79 5.1.2 Commercial Kits ................................................................................................ 81 5.2 Methods ..................................................................................................................... 81 5.2.1 Animal Model and Surgery .............................................................................. 81 5.2.1.1 Sciatic nerve axotomy ......................................................................................... 81 5.2.1.2 Dorsal Column Axotomy .................................................................................... 82 5.2.2 DRG dissection and sample preparation for MeDIP ..................................... 82 5.2.3 Methylated DNA Immunoprecipitation .......................................................... 82 5.2.4 Whole genome amplification ............................................................................ 84 5.2.5 DNA Methylation Microarray ......................................................................... 85 5.2.6 Quantitative Real-Time RT-PCR .................................................................... 85 5.2.6.1 RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis .................................................................. 85 5.2.6.2 Custom TaqMan Gene Expression Array ........................................................... 85 5.2.7 Promoter CGI analysis ..................................................................................... 86 5.2.8 Chromatin Immunoprecipitation .................................................................... 86 5.2.9 Primers and Design Software ........................................................................... 87 5.2.10 Primary Cell Culture, Immunocytochemistry and Analysis, Western Blot, AAV Infection, Luciferase Assay ..................................................................... 90 6 Bibliography / List of References ............................................................................ 91 7 Appendix ................................................................................................................. 108 7.1 Supplementary Tables ........................................................................................... 108 7.2 List of Abbreviations .............................................................................................. 121 7.3 List of Figures ......................................................................................................... 122 7.4 List of Tables ........................................................................................................... 123 7.5 Publications and congress presentations .............................................................. 124 7.6 Curriculum Vitae ................................................................................................... 125 Role of Epigenetic Mechanisms in Axonal Regeneration III I. Eidesstattliche Erklärung Ich erkläre hiermit, 1. dass ich bisher genau ein Promotionsverfahren begonnen aber vorzeitig abgebrochen habe (Universität Tübingen, Institut für Physiologie, von September 2006 bis April 2008, betreut durch Prof. Dr. Florian Lang und Prof. Dr. Michael Duszenko). 2. dass die vorgelegte Dissertation noch nie ganz oder teilweise als Dissertation oder sonstige Prüfungsarbeit eingereicht worden ist, allerdings bereits teilweise zur Veröffentlichung einge- reicht worden ist: “PCAF-dependent epigenetic changes promote
Recommended publications
  • Oxidative Stress-Induced Chromosome Breaks Within
    Tan et al. Human Genomics (2018) 12:29 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40246-018-0160-8 PRIMARY RESEARCH Open Access Oxidative stress-induced chromosome breaks within the ABL gene: a model for chromosome rearrangement in nasopharyngeal carcinoma Sang-Nee Tan1, Sai-Peng Sim1* and Alan Soo-Beng Khoo2 Abstract Background: The mechanism underlying chromosome rearrangement in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) remains elusive. It is known that most of the aetiological factors of NPC trigger oxidative stress. Oxidative stress is a potent apoptotic inducer. During apoptosis, chromatin cleavage and DNA fragmentation occur. However, cells may undergo DNA repair and survive apoptosis. Non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) pathway has been known as the primary DNA repair system in human cells. The NHEJ process may repair DNA ends without any homology, although region of microhomology (a few nucleotides) is usually utilised by this DNA repair system. Cells that evade apoptosis via erroneous DNA repair may carry chromosomal aberration. Apoptotic nuclease was found to be associated with nuclear matrix during apoptosis. Matrix association region/scaffold attachment region (MAR/SAR) is the binding site of the chromosomal DNA loop structure to the nuclear matrix. When apoptotic nuclease is associated with nuclear matrix during apoptosis, it potentially cleaves at MAR/SAR. Cells that survive apoptosis via compromised DNA repair may carry chromosome rearrangement contributing to NPC tumourigenesis. The Abelson murine leukaemia (ABL) gene at 9q34 was targeted in this study as 9q34 is a common region of loss in NPC. This study aimed to identify the chromosome breakages and/or rearrangements in the ABL gene in cells undergoing oxidative stress-induced apoptosis.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from [266]
    Patterns of DNA methylation on the human X chromosome and use in analyzing X-chromosome inactivation by Allison Marie Cotton B.Sc., The University of Guelph, 2005 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in The Faculty of Graduate Studies (Medical Genetics) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) January 2012 © Allison Marie Cotton, 2012 Abstract The process of X-chromosome inactivation achieves dosage compensation between mammalian males and females. In females one X chromosome is transcriptionally silenced through a variety of epigenetic modifications including DNA methylation. Most X-linked genes are subject to X-chromosome inactivation and only expressed from the active X chromosome. On the inactive X chromosome, the CpG island promoters of genes subject to X-chromosome inactivation are methylated in their promoter regions, while genes which escape from X- chromosome inactivation have unmethylated CpG island promoters on both the active and inactive X chromosomes. The first objective of this thesis was to determine if the DNA methylation of CpG island promoters could be used to accurately predict X chromosome inactivation status. The second objective was to use DNA methylation to predict X-chromosome inactivation status in a variety of tissues. A comparison of blood, muscle, kidney and neural tissues revealed tissue-specific X-chromosome inactivation, in which 12% of genes escaped from X-chromosome inactivation in some, but not all, tissues. X-linked DNA methylation analysis of placental tissues predicted four times higher escape from X-chromosome inactivation than in any other tissue. Despite the hypomethylation of repetitive elements on both the X chromosome and the autosomes, no changes were detected in the frequency or intensity of placental Cot-1 holes.
    [Show full text]
  • UC San Diego UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UC San Diego UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Astrocyte activity modulated by S1P-signaling in a multiple sclerosis model Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2bn557vr Author Groves, Aran Publication Date 2015 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Astrocyte activity modulated by S1P-signaling in a multiple sclerosis model A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Neurosciences by Aran Groves Committee in charge: Professor Jerold Chun, Chair Professor JoAnn Trejo, Co-Chair Professor Jody Corey-Bloom Professor Mark Mayford Professor William Mobley 2015 The Dissertation of Aran Groves is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: Co-Chair Chair University of California, San Diego 2015 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page ..................................................................................................... iii Table of Contents ................................................................................................. iv List of Figures ....................................................................................................... vi List of Tables ....................................................................................................... viii Acknowledgments ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Translational Profiling Reveals the Transcriptome of Leptin Receptor Neurons and Its Regulation by Leptin
    TRANSLATIONAL PROFILING REVEALS THE TRANSCRIPTOME OF LEPTIN RECEPTOR NEURONS AND ITS REGULATION BY LEPTIN by Margaret B. Allison A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Molecular and Integrative Physiology) In the University of Michigan 2015 Doctoral Committee: Professor Martin G. Myers Jr., Chair Associate Professor Carol F. Elias Professor Malcolm J. Low Professor Suzanne Moenter Professor Audrey Seasholtz Before you leave these portals To meet less fortunate mortals There's just one final message I would give to you: You all have learned reliance On the sacred teachings of science So I hope, through life, you never will decline In spite of philistine defiance To do what all good scientists do: Experiment! -- Cole Porter There is no cure for curiosity. -- unknown © Margaret Brewster Allison 2015 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS If it takes a village to raise a child, it takes a research university to raise a graduate student. There are many people who have supported me over the past six years at Michigan, and it is hard to imagine pursuing my PhD without them. First and foremost among all the people I need to thank is my mentor, Martin. Nothing I might say here would ever suffice to cover the depth and breadth of my gratitude to him. Without his patience, his insight, and his at times insufferably positive outlook, I don’t know where I would be today. Martin supported my intellectual curiosity, honed my scientific inquiry, and allowed me to do some really fun research in his lab. It was a privilege and a pleasure to work for him and with him.
    [Show full text]
  • The Identification of Novel Regions for Reproduction Trait in Landrace and Large White Pigs Using a Single Step Genome-Wide Association Study
    Open Access Asian-Australas J Anim Sci Vol. 31, No. 12:1852-1862 December 2018 https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.18.0072 pISSN 1011-2367 eISSN 1976-5517 The identification of novel regions for reproduction trait in Landrace and Large White pigs using a single step genome-wide association study Rattikan Suwannasing1, Monchai Duangjinda1,*, Wuttigrai Boonkum1, Rutjawate Taharnklaew2, and Komson Tuangsithtanon3 * Corresponding Author: Monchai Duangjinda Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate a single step genome-wide association Tel: +66-43-202362, Fax: +66-43-202361, E-mail: [email protected] study (ssGWAS) for identifying genomic regions affecting reproductive traits in Landrace and Large White pigs. 1 Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Methods: The traits included the number of pigs weaned per sow per year (PWSY), the Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand 2 Research and Development Center Betagro Group, number of litters per sow per year (LSY), pigs weaned per litters (PWL), born alive per litters Pathumthani 12120, Thailand (BAL), non-productive day (NPD) and wean to conception interval per litters (W2CL). A 3 Betagro Hybrid International Company Limited, total of 321 animals (140 Landrace and 181 Large White pigs) were genotyped with the Illumina Bangkok 10210, Thailand Porcine SNP 60k BeadChip, containing 61,177 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), ORCID while multiple traits single-step genomic BLUP method was used to calculate variances of Rattikan Suwannasing 5 SNP windows for 11,048 Landrace and 13,985 Large White data records. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6950-4384 Monchai Duangjinda Results: The outcome of ssGWAS on the reproductive traits identified twenty-five and twenty- https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7044-8271 two SNPs associated with reproductive traits in Landrace and Large White, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UCLA UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Population Structure and Evidence of Selection in Domestic Dogs and Gray Wolves Based on X Chromosome Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4d17b0j3 Author Shohfi, Hanna Publication Date 2013 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Population Structure and Evidence of Selection in Domestic Dogs and Gray Wolves Based on X Chromosome Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms A thesis submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Biology by Hanna Elisibeth Shohfi 2013 ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS Population Structure and Evidence of Selection in Domestic Dogs and Gray Wolves Based on X Chromosome Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms by Hanna Elisibeth Shohfi Master of Science in Biology University of California, Los Angeles, 2013 Professor Robert K. Wayne, Chair Genomic resources developed for the domestic dog have provided powerful tools for studying canine evolutionary history and dog origins. Although X chromosome data are often excluded from these analyses due to their unique inheritance, comparisons of the X chromosome and the autosomes can illuminate differences in the histories of males and females as well as shed light on the forces of natural selection. Here we use X chromosome single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) to analyze evolutionary relationships among populations of gray wolves worldwide in comparison to domestic dogs, and investigate evidence of selection. The results are concordant with population structure indicated by autosomal data. We additionally conducted a selection scan to identify loci that are putatively under selection.
    [Show full text]
  • Predict AID Targeting in Non-Ig Genes Multiple Transcription Factor
    Downloaded from http://www.jimmunol.org/ by guest on September 26, 2021 is online at: average * The Journal of Immunology published online 20 March 2013 from submission to initial decision 4 weeks from acceptance to publication Multiple Transcription Factor Binding Sites Predict AID Targeting in Non-Ig Genes Jamie L. Duke, Man Liu, Gur Yaari, Ashraf M. Khalil, Mary M. Tomayko, Mark J. Shlomchik, David G. Schatz and Steven H. Kleinstein J Immunol http://www.jimmunol.org/content/early/2013/03/20/jimmun ol.1202547 Submit online. Every submission reviewed by practicing scientists ? is published twice each month by http://jimmunol.org/subscription Submit copyright permission requests at: http://www.aai.org/About/Publications/JI/copyright.html Receive free email-alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up at: http://jimmunol.org/alerts http://www.jimmunol.org/content/suppl/2013/03/20/jimmunol.120254 7.DC1 Information about subscribing to The JI No Triage! Fast Publication! Rapid Reviews! 30 days* Why • • • Material Permissions Email Alerts Subscription Supplementary The Journal of Immunology The American Association of Immunologists, Inc., 1451 Rockville Pike, Suite 650, Rockville, MD 20852 Copyright © 2013 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0022-1767 Online ISSN: 1550-6606. This information is current as of September 26, 2021. Published March 20, 2013, doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1202547 The Journal of Immunology Multiple Transcription Factor Binding Sites Predict AID Targeting in Non-Ig Genes Jamie L. Duke,* Man Liu,†,1 Gur Yaari,‡ Ashraf M. Khalil,x Mary M. Tomayko,{ Mark J. Shlomchik,†,x David G.
    [Show full text]
  • A Primate-Specific Retroviral Enhancer Wires the XACT Lncrna Into the Core Pluripotency Network in Human
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/693416; this version posted July 5, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. A primate-specific retroviral enhancer wires the XACT lncRNA into the core pluripotency network in human Miguel Casanova1#*, Madeleine Moscatelli1#, Louis Édouard Chauvière1, Christophe Huret1, Julia Samson1, Tharvesh Moideen Liyakat Ali1, Olga Rosspopoff1, Claire Rougeulle1* 1 Université de Paris, Epigenetics and Cell Fate, CNRS, F-75013 Paris, France # These authors contributed equally to this work *[email protected]; [email protected] Abstract Transposable elements (TEs) have been of paramount importance in shaping genomic and epigenomic landscapes of their hosts and in driving the expansion of gene regulatory networks during mammalian evolution. They are found in nearly all long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) and have promoted their evolution and function, often in a species- and tissue- specific manner. X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) is an essential process that relies on several TE-enriched lncRNAs. While XCI is conserved across species, one striking difference between human and mouse is the existence of XACT (X active coating transcript), a human-specific lncRNA that coats active X chromosomes in pluripotent cells and may oppose X chromosome silencing in this context. Here, we explore how different families of TEs have contributed to shaping the XACT locus and how they couple its expression to pluripotency in humans. Through a combination of sequence analysis across primates, transcriptional interference and genome editing in human embryonic stem cells (hESCs), we identify a critical enhancer for the transcriptional regulation of the XACT locus that evolved from an ancestral group (LTR48B/ERV1) of mammalian endogenous retroviruses (ERVs), prior to the emergence of XACT.
    [Show full text]
  • Potential Role Vasculogenesis in Lupus Are Mediated
    Downloaded from http://www.jimmunol.org/ by guest on September 29, 2021 Kaplan is online at: on α average * The Journal of Immunology , 44 of which you can access for free at: 2010; 185:4457-4469; Prepublished online 30 from submission to initial decision 4 weeks from acceptance to publication The Detrimental Effects of IFN- August 2010; doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1001782 http://www.jimmunol.org/content/185/7/4457 Vasculogenesis in Lupus Are Mediated by Repression of IL-1 Pathways: Potential Role in Atherogenesis and Renal Vascular Rarefaction J Immunol Seth G. Thacker, Celine C. Berthier, Deborah Mattinzoli, Maria Pia Rastaldi, Matthias Kretzler and Mariana J. cites 131 articles Submit online. Every submission reviewed by practicing scientists ? is published twice each month by Submit copyright permission requests at: http://www.aai.org/About/Publications/JI/copyright.html Receive free email-alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up at: http://jimmunol.org/alerts http://jimmunol.org/subscription http://www.jimmunol.org/content/suppl/2010/08/30/jimmunol.100178 2.DC1 This article http://www.jimmunol.org/content/185/7/4457.full#ref-list-1 Information about subscribing to The JI No Triage! Fast Publication! Rapid Reviews! 30 days* Why • • • Material References Permissions Email Alerts Subscription Supplementary The Journal of Immunology The American Association of Immunologists, Inc., 1451 Rockville Pike, Suite 650, Rockville, MD 20852 Copyright © 2010 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0022-1767 Online ISSN: 1550-6606. This information is current as of September 29, 2021. The Journal of Immunology The Detrimental Effects of IFN-a on Vasculogenesis in Lupus Are Mediated by Repression of IL-1 Pathways: Potential Role in Atherogenesis and Renal Vascular Rarefaction Seth G.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Figure S1 A
    Supplementary Figure S1 A B C 1 4 1 3 1 2 1 2 1 0 1 1 (Normalized signal values)] 2 (Normalized signal values) (Normalized 8 2 10 Log 6 AFFX-BioC AFFX-BioB AFFX-BioDn AFFX-CreX hDFs [Log 6 8 10 12 14 hOFs [Log2 (Normalized signal values)] Supplementary Figure S2 GLYCOLYSIS PENTOSE-PHOSPHATE PATHWAY Glucose Purine/pyrimidine Glucose-6-phosphate metabolism AMINO ACID Fluctose-6-phosphate AMPK METABOLISM TIGAR PFKFB2 methylgloxal GloI Ser, Gly, Thr Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate ALDH Lactate PYRUVATE LDH METABOLISM acetic acid Ethanol Pyruvate GLYCOSPHINGOLIPID NADH BIOSYNTHESIS Ala, Cys DLD PDH PDK3 DLAT Fatty acid Lys, Trp, Leu, Acetyl CoA ACAT2 Ile, Tyr, Phe β-OXIDATION ACACA Citrate Asp, Asn Citrate Acetyl CoA Oxaloacetate Isocitrate MDH1 IDH1 Glu, Gln, His, ME2 TCA Pro, Arg 2-Oxoglutarate MDH1 CYCLE Pyruvate Malate ME2 GLUTAMINOLYSIS FH Succinyl-CoA Fumalate SUCLA2 Tyr, Phe Var, Ile, Met Supplementary Figure S3 Entrez Gene Symbol Gene Name hODs hDFs hOF-iPSCs GeneID 644 BLVRA biliverdin reductase A 223.9 259.3 253.0 3162 HMOX1 heme oxygenase 1 1474.2 2698.0 452.3 9365 KL klotho 54.1 44.8 36.5 nicotinamide 10135 NAMPT 827.7 626.2 2999.8 phosphoribosyltransferase nuclear factor (erythroid- 4780 NFE2L2 2134.5 1331.7 1006.2 derived 2) related factor 2 peroxisome proliferator- 5467 PPARD 1534.6 1352.9 330.8 activated receptor delta peroxisome proliferator- 5468 PPARG 524.4 100.8 63.0 activated receptor gamma 5621 PRNP prion protein 4059.0 3134.1 1065.5 5925 RB1 retinoblastoma 1 882.9 805.8 739.3 23411 SIRT1 sirtuin 1 231.5 216.8 1676.0 7157 TP53
    [Show full text]
  • A Primate-Specific Retroviral Enhancer Wires the XACT Lncrna
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13551-1 OPEN A primate-specific retroviral enhancer wires the XACT lncRNA into the core pluripotency network in humans Miguel Casanova 1,2*, Madeleine Moscatelli1,2, Louis Édouard Chauvière1, Christophe Huret1, Julia Samson1, Tharvesh Moideen Liyakat Ali1, Olga Rosspopoff1 & Claire Rougeulle 1* 1234567890():,; Transposable elements (TEs) have been proposed to play an important role in driving the expansion of gene regulatory networks during mammalian evolution, notably by contributing to the evolution and function of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs). XACT is a primate-specific TE-derived lncRNA that coats active X chromosomes in pluripotent cells and may contribute to species-specific regulation of X-chromosome inactivation. Here we explore how different families of TEs have contributed to shaping the XACT locus and coupling its expression to pluripotency. Through a combination of sequence analysis across primates, transcriptional interference, and genome editing, we identify a critical enhancer for the regulation of the XACT locus that evolved from an ancestral group of mammalian endogenous retroviruses (ERVs), prior to the emergence of XACT. This ERV was hijacked by younger hominoid-specific ERVs that gave rise to the promoter of XACT, thus wiring its expression to the pluripotency network. This work illustrates how retroviral-derived sequences may intervene in species- specific regulatory pathways. 1 Université de Paris, Epigenetics and Cell Fate, CNRS, F-75013 Paris, France. 2These authors contributed equally: Miguel Casanova, Madeleine Moscatelli. *email: [email protected]; [email protected] NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | (2019) 10:5652 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13551-1 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications 1 ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13551-1 ore than half of the human genome is composed of being expressed and how is XCI coupled to a later developmental Mtransposable elements (TEs), which are mobile genomic stage in humans.
    [Show full text]
  • Mutations in the Lipoma HMGIC Fusion Partner-Like 5 (LHFPL5) Gene Cause Autosomal Recessive Nonsyndromic Hearing Loss
    HUMAN MUTATION 27(7), 633^639, 2006 RAPID COMMUNICATION Mutations in the lipoma HMGIC fusion partner-like 5 (LHFPL5) Gene Cause Autosomal Recessive Nonsyndromic Hearing Loss Ersan Kalay,1–3 Yun Li,4,5 Abdullah Uzumcu,6 Oya Uyguner,6 Rob W. Collin,2 Refik Caylan,7 Melike Ulubil-Emiroglu,8 Ferry F.J. Kersten,2 Gunter Hafiz,8 Erwin van Wijk,2 Hulya Kayserili,6 Edyta Rohmann,4,5 Janine Wagenstaller,9 Lies H. Hoefsloot,1 Tim M. Strom,9,10 Gudrun Nu¨rnberg,11,12 Nermin Baserer,8 Anneke I. den Hollander,1,13 Frans P.M. Cremers,1,13 Cor W.R.J. Cremers,2 Christian Becker,11,12 Han G. Brunner,1,13 Peter Nu¨rnberg,11,14 Ahmet Karaguzel,3 Seher Basaran,6 Christian Kubisch,4,5,14 Hannie Kremer,2 and Bernd Wollnik4–6Ã 1Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; 2Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; 3Department of Medical Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey; 4Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; 5Institute of Human Genetics, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; 6Medical Genetics Department, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey; 7Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey; 8Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey; 9Institute of Human Genetics, GSF National Research Center for Environment
    [Show full text]